Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Optimization studies of silicon remoTES cryogenic calorimeters

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a superconducting Al/Au phonon collector, paired with the Au island TES port design, is the decisive optimization for silicon remoTES calorimeters, reaching a baseline resolution of $(21.5 \pm 0.3)$ eV.

desk verdict A genuinely new 21.5 eV remoTES baseline, but the Al/Au attribution is undercut by uncontrolled noise; worth refereeing with a request for a controlled check. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09544 v1 pith:F77Z3UVH submitted 2026-08-10 physics.ins-det

G. Angloher , M.R. Bharadwaj , A. Boehmer , S. Braun , M.R. Cababie , I. Colantoni , I. Dafinei , N. Di Marco
show 37 more authors
C. Dittmar F. Ferella F. Ferroni S. Fichtinger A. Filipponi M. Friedl D. Fuchs L. Gai M. Gapp M. Heikinheimo K. Heim K. Huitu M. Kellermann R. Maji M. Mancuso L. Pagnanini F. Petricca S. Pirro F. Proebst G. Profeta A. Puiu F. Reindl K. Schaeffner J. Schieck P. Schreiner C. Schwertner P. Settembri K. Shera M. Stahlberg A. Stendahl M. Stukel C. Tresca S. Yue V. Zema Y. Zhu L. Ziegele N. Zimmermann
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-det
keywords remoTEScryogeniccalorimetertransitionedgesensorphononcollectorthermalboundaryresistancesiliconabsorberquasiparticletrappingbaselineresolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to show that the remoTES scheme—a cryogenic calorimeter whose transition-edge sensor sits on a separate chip and is linked to the absorber by a gold wire—can be pushed toward the performance of standard detectors by optimizing the interfaces phonons must cross. Using silicon absorbers as a benchmark, the authors vary the phonon collector material and the shape of the gold contact on the sensor chip. They report that a superconducting aluminum-on-gold collector yields a baseline resolution of $(21.5 \pm 0.3)$ eV, compared with $(94.6 \pm 0.5)$ eV for copper and $(267.2 \pm 2.1)$ eV for gold. This matters because the detached-sensor design was introduced to allow hygroscopic and fragile crystals, such as sodium iodide, to be used as absorber materials in rare-event searches.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the phonon collector: a thin metal film on the absorber that converts phonons into electronic excitations. The comparison uses three variants—normal-conducting Au, normal-conducting Cu, and superconducting Al with a small Au pad (Al/Au) that acts as a quasiparticle trap. The companion mechanism is the Au island TES design, where the gold bonding port is deposited entirely on the tungsten thermometer film, enlarging the Au–W contact area and raising the thermal conductance relative to the previous Au bridge design. Together these set the thermal boundary resistance and electron-phonon conductance that determine the transmitted signal.

What would settle it

Operate the same three phonon collector designs on identical silicon absorbers in a single cooldown with matched operating points and check whether the Al/Au detector still reaches about 22 eV baseline resolution. Alternatively, measure the thermal boundary conductance at the Si/Al interface directly: if it is not higher than at the Si/Au interface, the proposed mechanism loses its support.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the phonon collector material is a first-order factor in how much of the energy deposited in a silicon absorber reaches the thermometer. Three otherwise identical detectors were built with Au, Cu, and Al/Au phonon collectors. The Al/Au detector clearly resolved the K$\alpha$ and K$\beta$ lines of an $^{55}$Fe source, produced the narrowest fitted line width, and reached a baseline resolution of $(21.5 \pm 0.3)$ eV, while the Cu and Au detectors reached $(94.6 \pm 0.5)$ eV and $(267.2 \pm 2.1)$ eV. The authors attribute the improvement to the lower heat capacity of the Al/Au collector, stronger electron-phonon coupling in aluminum, and phonon absorption through Cooper-pair breaking followed by quasiparticle diffusion into the gold pad. The paper also validates the Au island TES layout, in which the gold port sits entirely on the tungsten film, as producing faster pulse decay than the older Au bridge geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison stands on the claim that only the phonon collector was varied while all other components were identical, but the three detectors were operated under different noise conditions, so the resolution differences could partly come from the noise environment rather than the collector material.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Au island TES geometry will be carried into the NaI remoTES detectors planned for the first physics run, replacing the Au bridge layout.
  • With an Al/Au phonon collector, a remoTES detector can resolve the 5.89 keV and 6.49 keV calibration lines, a spectroscopic capability the Au and Cu collectors did not provide.
  • The 21.5 eV baseline resolution is the best reported for any remoTES detector, narrowing the gap to detectors with the TES deposited directly on the absorber.
  • Phonon collector material should be treated as a tunable design parameter in future remoTES detectors, with material choice influencing both pulse speed and energy resolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the material effect is real, the Al/Au geometry—Al pad area, overlap, and Au pad size—becomes a tunable parameter, and optimizing it could push remoTES resolution closer to the sub-eV range of directly deposited TES devices.
  • The Cu collector's slower pulses yet better resolution than Au hint that heat capacity and electron-phonon coupling trade off against collection area; a systematic matrix of thickness and area could separate these effects.
  • Because the phonon-collection physics at the absorber/collector interface is not silicon-specific, the same Al/Au optimization should transfer to hygroscopic targets such as NaI, where the detached-sensor design delivers its largest practical benefit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports optimization studies of silicon remoTES cryogenic calorimeters for the COSINUS experiment. It presents two sets of measurements: a comparison of Au bridge versus Au island TES designs, where the Au island design yields faster pulse decay, and a three-detector comparison of phonon collector materials (Au, Cu, and Al/Au) on otherwise nominally identical Si absorbers. Using optimal filtering, the authors report baseline resolutions of (267.2±2.1) eV, (94.6±0.5) eV, and (21.5±0.3) eV for the Au, Cu, and Al/Au collectors, respectively. The manuscript argues that the Al/Au collector improves signal transmission because of its lower heat capacity, higher electron-phonon coupling, and Cooper-pair-breaking phonon collection, and concludes that the phonon collector material plays a significant role in remoTES performance. The paper also acknowledges that the three detectors were operated under different noise conditions, which is directly relevant to the validity of the cross-detector comparison.

Significance. If the reported 21.5 eV baseline resolution is robust, it is a practically useful step for remoTES detectors, which are important for extending TES readout to hygroscopic or fragile absorber materials such as NaI. The manuscript is clearly written and provides detailed descriptions of the detector geometries, the noise PSDs, and the pulse shapes, and it uses a standard optimal-filter analysis. The headline number itself is a direct measurement and is not inflated by fitted parameters. However, the central attribution—that the Al/Au collector material causes the resolution improvement—is not yet established because the comparison is not controlled for noise. Since the optimal-filter baseline resolution is derived from the noise PSD and the pulse template, the quieter environment of the Al/Au run could account for a substantial part of the observed improvement. The paper's own statement that 'each detector was operated under different noise conditions' (Section 4.2) makes this a load-bearing issue rather than a presentation detail. The comparison to published CRESST and TESSERACT results is useful context, but the internal cross-detector claim needs additional support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Table 1 and Fig. 5 (right panel)] The conclusion that the Al/Au phonon collector is responsible for the 21.5 eV baseline resolution is not supported by the presented comparison because the paper states that 'each detector was operated under different noise conditions' and the right panel of Fig. 5 shows visibly different noise PSDs. The optimal-filter baseline resolution is computed from the noise PSD and the pulse template, so a lower-noise environment alone can produce a better baseline. The paper does not quantify how much of the factor-12 improvement over the Au configuration is due to the lower noise floor. To support the attribution, the authors should compute the expected baseline resolution for each detector using a common or normalized noise model, or operate the Al/Au detector under noise conditions comparable to the other configurations, or otherwise show that the resolution difference persists after accounting for the noise difference.
  2. [Section 4.2, paragraph beginning 'To ensure a controlled and systematic comparison'] The claim that 'only the phonon collector was varied' is not accurate as stated: the Al/Au collector differs from the Au and Cu collectors not only in material but also in total pad area (2.13 mm² versus 3 mm²), film thickness (1 µm Al and 0.6 µm Au versus 0.20 µm and 0.25 µm), and number of pads. These differences affect heat capacity, quasiparticle diffusion length, and collection geometry. The comparison therefore isolates a design configuration, not the material alone. The conclusions in Section 5 should be rephrased accordingly, or the comparison should include an Al/Au collector with the same total area and thickness as the Au reference.
  3. [Section 4.1 versus Section 4.2, Table 1] The Au-collector reference used in the three-way comparison gives (267.2±2.1) eV, whereas Section 4.1 cites (89±2) eV as the best Si remoTES result with a Au collector. With one device per configuration, the 267.2 eV device may be an outlier, and the factor-12 improvement over that particular device is not a robust measure of the collector-material effect. The authors should report device-to-device scatter or justify that the 267.2 eV device is representative of the Au-collector configuration; otherwise the central comparison lacks a reliable baseline.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5] The phrase 'Al/Au phono collector' should be corrected to 'Al/Au phonon collector'.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The caption notes that the three spectra were acquired with different exposure times, but it does not state the exposure or live-time values; adding them would help the reader compare the spectra.
  3. [Table 1] The abbreviation 'pc' for phonon collector is used in the table but is not defined in the caption; please spell it out or define it.
  4. [Section 4.2, discussion of the Kα shoulder] The low-energy shoulder on the Al/Au Kα peak is attributed to the Au pad of the phonon collector, but no model or fit is shown to support this; a brief quantitative justification or a reference to the planned dedicated study would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central results are direct measurements with the noise confound explicitly acknowledged.

full rationale

No circular step is present. The paper reports baseline resolutions measured directly for three detector configurations that differ in phonon collector material; the optimal-filter baseline resolution is a measured quantity derived from each detector's noise PSD and pulse template, not a fitted parameter used to predict itself. The comparison to CRESST and TESSERACT uses independent published values (Refs. [34] and [6]). Self-citations such as Refs. [12] and [31] supply background and prior optimization context, but the Au-island validation in Sec. 4.1 and the three-collector comparison in Sec. 4.2 are new measurements described in this paper. The paper explicitly flags that the detectors were operated under different noise conditions ('A direct quantitative comparison of the performance across the three detector configurations is complicated by the fact that each detector was operated under different noise conditions'), which is an experimental limitation affecting causal attribution rather than a circular reduction: the measured resolutions remain what they are, and the confound is acknowledged. No equation is defined in terms of the result it purports to derive, and no fitted input is renamed a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the paper reports direct measurements. The interpretation relies on standard phonon physics and material property values from the literature.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Phonons in the absorber decay via anharmonic down-conversion and are collected at the phonon collector.
    Standard model of phonon-mediated detection, cited from references [16-19] in Section 3.1.
  • domain assumption The Al/Au phonon collector absorbs phonons via Cooper pair breaking and quasiparticle diffusion.
    Cited from reference [15], assumed to explain pulse shape differences in Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption Heat capacities and electron-phonon coupling strengths quoted for Au, Cu, and Al are correct.
    From references [29, 35]; used to interpret resolution differences across the three detectors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimization studies of silicon remoTES cryogenic calorimeters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F77Z3UVH

@misc{pith2026260809544,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimization studies of silicon remoTES cryogenic calorimeters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F77Z3UVH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09544}
}
read the original abstract

The remoTES design, developed within the COSINUS experiment, enables a broader range of materials to be operated as cryogenic calorimeters read out with Transition Edge Sensors (TESs). In this configuration, the TES is fabricated onto a separate chip and thermally coupled to the absorber via a gold (Au) link. The remoTES concept has been successfully tested on various target materials. To further enhance detector performance and to fully exploit the advantages of the remote coupling design a series of optimization studies has been conducted using silicon (Si) absorbers as benchmark. This work presents an evaluation of several measurements aimed at reducing the thermal boundary resistance and enhancing signal transmission across Si remoTES interfaces, specifically from the absorber to the phonon collector and from the phonon collector to the TES. By testing a new Au link design and three distinct phonon collector configurations, Au, copper, and aluminum (Al)/Au, we achieved a baseline resolution of (21.5 +/- 0.3)eV using the Al/Au phonon collector.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    : First observation of single photons in a CRESST detector and new dark matter exclusion limits

    Angloher, G., et al. : First observation of single photons in a CRESST detector and new dark matter exclusion limits. Phys. Rev. D 110(8), 083038 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083038

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.083038 2024

  2. [2]

    : Transition Edge Sensors with Sub-eV Resolution And Cryo- genic Targets (TESSERACT) at the underground laboratory of Modane (LSM)

    Billard, J., , et al. : Transition Edge Sensors with Sub-eV Resolution And Cryo- genic Targets (TESSERACT) at the underground laboratory of Modane (LSM). Nuclear Physics B 1003, 116465 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb. 2024.116465 . Special Issue of Nobel Symposium 182 on Dark Matter

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Physical Review D 100(10) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevd.100.102002

    Abdelhameed, A.H., et al.: First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program. Physical Review D 100(10) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevd.100.102002

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    : Light Dark Matter Search with a High-Resolution Athermal Phonon Detector Operated Above Ground

    Alkhatib, I., et al. : Light Dark Matter Search with a High-Resolution Athermal Phonon Detector Operated Above Ground. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 061801 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.061801 11

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.061801 2021

  5. [5]

    : Light dark matter constraints from SuperCDMS HVeV detectors operated underground with an anticoincidence event selection

    Albakry, M.F., et al. : Light dark matter constraints from SuperCDMS HVeV detectors operated underground with an anticoincidence event selection. Phys. Rev. D 111(1), 012006 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.012006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.012006 2025

  6. [6]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03683

    Chang, C.L., et al.: First Limits on Light Dark Matter Interactions in a Low Threshold Two Channel Athermal Phonon Detector from the TESSERACT Collaboration (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03683

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    : Commissioning of the NUCLEUS Experiment at the Technical University of Munich

    Abele, H., et al. : Commissioning of the NUCLEUS Experiment at the Technical University of Munich. Phys. Rev. D 112(7), 072013 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1103/c95p-8kh2

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Barret, D., Lam Trong, T., Herder, J.-W., Piro, L., Barcons, X., Huovelin, J., Kelley, R., Mas-Hesse, J.M., Mitsuda, K., Paltani, S., et al.: The athena x-ray integral field unit. Proc. SPIE 10699 (2018) arXiv:1807.06092 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    : First measurements of remoTES cryogenic calorimeters: Easy-to-fabricate particle detectors for a wide choice of target materials

    Angloher, G., et al. : First measurements of remoTES cryogenic calorimeters: Easy-to-fabricate particle detectors for a wide choice of target materials. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spec- trometers, Detectors and Associated Equip...

    2023

  2. [10]

    : Complementarity of dark matter direct detection: the role of bolometric targets

    Cerdeño, D.G., et al. : Complementarity of dark matter direct detection: the role of bolometric targets. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013(07), 028–028 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2013/07/028

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.5158

    Artuso, M., et al.: Sensor Compendium (2013). https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.5158

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Journal of Low Temperature Physics 217, 393–400 (2024) https://doi.org/10

    Zema, V., et al.: Description and Performance of the COSINUS remoTES Design. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 217, 393–400 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10909-024-03201-2

    2024

  5. [13]

    : Deep-underground dark matter search with a cosinus detector prototype

    Angloher, G., et al. : Deep-underground dark matter search with a cosinus detector prototype. Phys. Rev. D 110, 043010 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.110.043010

    2024

  6. [14]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02429

    Angloher, G., et al.: COSINUS – a model-independent challenge of the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter claim with cryogenic NaI detectors operated in a new low-background facility (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02429

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    : Measurement of quasiparticle transport in aluminum films using tungsten transition-edge sensors

    Yen, J.J., et al. : Measurement of quasiparticle transport in aluminum films using tungsten transition-edge sensors. Applied Physics Letters 105(16), 163504 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4899130

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    John Wiley & Sons, ??? (2010) 12

    Knoll, G.F.: Radiation Detection and Measurement. John Wiley & Sons, ??? (2010) 12

    2010

  9. [17]

    Klemens, P.G.: Anharmonic Decay of Optical Phonons. Phys. Rev. 148, 845–848 (1966) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.148.845

    1966 doi

  10. [18]

    Usher, S., Srivastava, G.P.: Theoretical study of the anharmonic decay of nonequi- librium LO phonons in semiconductor structures. Phys. Rev. B 50, 14179–14186 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.14179

    1994 doi

  11. [19]

    CRC Press, Boca Raton, Abingdon (UK) (2022)

    Srivastava, G.P.: The Physics of Phonons, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Abingdon (UK) (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Kapitza, P.L.: Heat Transfer and Superfluidity of Helium II. Phys. Rev. 60, 354–355 (1941) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.60.354

    1941 doi

  13. [21]

    : Model for cryogenic particle detectors with superconducting phase transition thermometers

    Pröbst, F., et al. : Model for cryogenic particle detectors with superconducting phase transition thermometers. Journal of low temperature physics 100(1), 69– 104 (1995)

    1995

  14. [22]

    Swartz, E.T., Pohl, R.O.: Thermal boundary resistance. Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 605–668 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.61.605

    1989 doi

  15. [23]

    Raya-Moreno, M., et al.: Phonon dynamics for light dark matter detection. Phys. Rev. D 110, 112007 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.112007

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Journal of Applied Physics 137(11) (2025)

    Khot, K., et al.: Phonon local non-equilibrium at Al/Si interface from machine learning molecular dynamics. Journal of Applied Physics 137(11) (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    : Comprehensive first-principles analysis of phonon thermal con- ductivity and electron-phonon coupling in different metals

    Tong, Z., et al. : Comprehensive first-principles analysis of phonon thermal con- ductivity and electron-phonon coupling in different metals. Physical review B 100(14), 144306 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Ono, S.: Low-temperature electron-phonon relaxation in Cu and Ag thin films. Phys. Rev. B 101, 201404 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.201404

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Phys- ical Review 111(1), 132 (1958)

    Cochran, J.F., Mapother, D.E.: Superconducting transition in aluminum. Phys- ical Review 111(1), 132 (1958)

    1958

  20. [28]

    Pobell, F.: Matter and Methods at Low Temperatures vol. 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany (2007)

    2007

  21. [30]

    : A quasiparticle-trap-assisted transition-edge sensor for phonon-mediated particle detection

    Irwin, K.D., et al. : A quasiparticle-trap-assisted transition-edge sensor for phonon-mediated particle detection. Review of Scientific Instruments 66(11), 5322–5326 (1995) 13

    1995

  22. [31]

    Master’s thesis, TU München, Munich, Germany (2023)

    Shera, K.: Studies on remoTES-based Cryogenic Calorimeters for the COS- INUS Experiment. Master’s thesis, TU München, Munich, Germany (2023). https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/faces/ViewItemOverviewPage.jsp?itemId=item_ 3580579

    2023

  23. [32]

    PhD thesis, Technische Universität München (2025)

    Kellermann, M.: Development and Operation of Next-Generation Low- Temperature Detectors for the COSINUS Dark Matter Search. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München (2025). https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1776000

    2025

  24. [33]

    PhD thesis, Technische Universität Wien; Öster- reichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (2023)

    Wagner, F.: Towards next-generation cryogenic dark matter searches with superconducting thermometers. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Wien; Öster- reichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (2023). https://doi.org/10.34726/hss. 2023.106550

    2023

  25. [34]

    : Results on sub-GeV dark matter from a 10 eV threshold CRESST-III silicon detector

    Angloher, G., et al. : Results on sub-GeV dark matter from a 10 eV threshold CRESST-III silicon detector. Phys. Rev. D 107(12), 122003 (2023) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.122003 arXiv:2212.12513 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [35]

    : Comprehensive first-principles analysis of phonon thermal con- ductivity and electron-phonon coupling in different metals

    Tong, Z., , et al. : Comprehensive first-principles analysis of phonon thermal con- ductivity and electron-phonon coupling in different metals. Physical Review B 100, 144306 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144306

    2019 doi

  27. [36]

    La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1978-1999) 9, 1–146 (1986)

    Gatti, E., Manfredi, P.F.: Processing the signals from solid-state detectors in elementary-particle physics. La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1978-1999) 9, 1–146 (1986)

    1986

  28. [37]

    : BAT.jl: A Julia-Based Tool for Bayesian Inference

    Schulz, O., et al. : BAT.jl: A Julia-Based Tool for Bayesian Inference. SN Com- puter Science 2(3), 210 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00626-4 . Published 2021-04-12

    2021 doi

  29. [38]

    Master’s thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany (2025)

    Braun, S.: Pulse Shape Studies on COSINUS remoTES Detectors using Bayesian Analysis. Master’s thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany (2025). https://publications.mppmu.mpg.de/2025/MPP-2025-209/FullText.pdf 14

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.