Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Memory-Generated Transport Geometry: Curvature, Holonomy, and Irreversibility

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Finite memory alone generates the geometry that makes periodic, irrotational flows transport irreversibly.

desk verdict The paper's central claim that finite memory generates transport geometry fails in the Markovian limit for time-periodic flows, and its numerics contradict its own analytic invariant. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09607 v1 pith:ZVD5UOKG submitted 2026-08-10 physics.flu-dyn

Mounir Kassmi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords finitememorytransportgeometrycurvatureholonomyirreversibleirrotationalflowsnon-Markoviandynamicsuniversalscaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that finite memory is not a correction layered onto transport but the mechanism that generates transport's geometry. It replaces the instantaneous velocity gradient with a memory-weighted connection, $A_m(t) = \int_0^\infty \mathcal{K}(\tau)\,\nabla u(x, t-\tau)\,d\tau$, and claims that the chronological ordering of this connection produces noncommutativity, curvature, and holonomy — a purely kinematic source of irreversible Lagrangian transport that needs no vorticity, noise, nonlinearity, or broken symmetry. The central quantitative claim is a universal response: the net Lagrangian displacement per forcing cycle scales as $(\omega\tau_m)^2/(1+(\omega\tau_m)^2)$, strongest when forcing period and memory time match, saturating for long memory, with an emergent geometric scale $\tau_c$ marking the crossover. If correct, the paper supplies a new diagnostic: measurable irreversible drift in an oscillatory irrotational flow becomes evidence that the medium carries finite causal memory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the memory-dependent transport connection $A_m(t)$, a causal reweighting of the velocity-gradient history that replaces the instantaneous generator $\nabla u(t)$. Its ordered exponential $U = \mathcal{P}\exp(\int A_m\, dt)$ transports infinitesimal displacements, and the failure of $A_m(t_1)$ and $A_m(t_2)$ to commute defines the curvature operator $\mathcal{R}(t_1,t_2) = [A_m(t_1), A_m(t_2)]$, whose second Magnus contribution $\Omega_2 = \tfrac{1}{2}\int\!\int \mathcal{R}\,dt_1 dt_2$ is the part of finite transport that no instantaneous generator can reproduce. The dimensionless ratio $x = \omega\tau_m$ between forcing and memory timescales organizes the entire theory: it enters the universal response $F(x) = x^2/(1+x^2)$ for displacement, energy, and the invariant $I_m = \operatorname{Tr}(\mathcal{R}^2)$, which the paper proves invariant under general linear changes of representation. In the solvable harmonic model the reconstructed connection closes to $A_m(t) = [(A+\omega\tau_m B)\cos\omega t + (B-\omega\tau_m A)\sin\omega t]/(1+(\omega\tau_m)^2)$, and a supplemental theorem shows that single-mode separable flows have identically zero curvature for any kernel, making noncommuting deformation modes a necessary ingredient of the mechanism.

What would settle it

Evaluate the paper's own model in the memory-free limit: with $\nabla u(t) = A\cos\omega t + B\sin\omega t$, the reconstructed connection reduces to $A_m(t) \to \nabla u(t)$ as $\tau_m \to 0$, and a direct one-line calculation gives $[A_m(t_1), A_m(t_2)] = [A,B]\,\sin(\omega(t_2-t_1))/(1+(\omega\tau_m)^2)$, which stays nonzero whenever $A$ and $B$ do not commute — contradicting the paper's stated prefactor $\omega\tau_m/(1+(\omega\tau_m)^2)$, which vanishes at $\tau_m = 0$. Substituting the paper's own closed form for $A_m(t)$ into $\mathcal{R}(t_1,t_2) = [A_m(t_1), A_m(t_2)]$ gives the same nonvanishing result. The claim is settled by this hand calculation, and experimentally by driving a memory-free linear oscillatory flow with two noncommuting modes: if a net cyclic drift already appears as $\tau_m \to 0$, curvature and holonomy predate memory.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that finite causal memory turns the kinematics of deformation into a genuine geometry. Deformation is reconstructed from history through the memory-dependent transport connection $A_m(t) = \int_0^\infty \mathcal{K}(\tau)\,\nabla u(x, t-\tau)\,d\tau$, which replaces the instantaneous velocity gradient as the generator of transport. Because $A_m(t)$ keeps changing as history accumulates, successive infinitesimal generators fail to commute; the paper defines the memory-induced curvature operator $\mathcal{R}(t_1, t_2) = [A_m(t_1), A_m(t_2)]$, and the second Magnus term $\Omega_2 = \tfrac{1}{2}\int_0^T dt_1\int_0^{t_1} dt_2\, \mathcal{R}(t_1,t_2)$ gives the holonomy — a net Lagrangian displacement after one forcing cycle. For the exactly solvable monochromatic model $\nabla u(t) = A\cos\omega t + B\sin\omega t$ with an exponential memory kernel, the paper derives the curvature $\mathcal{R}(t_1,t_2) \propto [\omega\tau_m/(1+(\omega\tau_m)^2)]\,[A,B]\,\sin(\omega(t_1-t_2))$, the representation-independent invariant $I_m = \operatorname{Tr}(\mathcal{R}^2)$, and the universal displacement scaling $\Delta\gamma \propto (\omega\tau_m)^2/(1+(\omega\tau_m)^2)$. The paper reports that numerical simulations confirm the scaling collapse, an emergent geometric scale with dimensionless value $\tau_c \simeq 13.9$, and a monotonically decreasing susceptibility with globally concave accumulation — geometric saturation rather than resonant amplification.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that in the memory-free limit successive transport generators coincide exactly, so all noncommutativity — and therefore all curvature — must come from finite memory; for the paper's own time-periodic flow, even the instantaneous velocity gradient changes with time, so this coincidence fails and the claim that memory is the geometric origin loses its footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A measurable cyclic drift in an oscillatory, irrotational, linearly driven flow becomes a memory diagnostic: under this theory it is direct evidence that the medium carries finite causal memory.
  • The universal response $F(x) = x^2/(1+x^2)$ with $x = \omega\tau_m$ means systems on vastly different absolute timescales — molecular to geological — show identical normalized geometry at the same $x$, so experiments need only control the forcing-to-memory ratio.
  • The theory predicts three regimes: quadratic growth $\Delta\gamma \propto (\omega\tau_m)^2$ for weak memory, maximal holonomy near $\omega\tau_m \approx 1$, and a finite saturated displacement $\Delta\gamma_{\max}$ for long memory, with the emergent scale $\tau_c$ (dimensionless value about 13.9) marking the crossover.
  • Because the supplemental theorem shows single-mode flows have zero curvature for any kernel, the mechanism applies precisely when the flow's deformation generators span a non-Abelian algebra — which gives an explicit, checkable condition for when memory should produce irreversibility.
  • Memory enters the energy budget through curvature: the geometric action $S_m \propto \operatorname{Tr}([A,B]^2)\,F(x)$ is representation-independent, so the extra energetic cost of memory is geometric rather than purely dissipative.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the memory time is set by material relaxation, the framework makes geometry thermodynamically addressable: near a glass transition or critical point where $\tau_m$ diverges, the same oscillatory flow should sweep the full response $F(x)$ from growth to saturation, making cyclic drift a sensitive probe of the transition region.
  • The author leaves memory resonance open for oscillatory kernels; a kernel carrying an internal frequency $\omega_k$ should produce resonant enhancement of $I_m$ when $\omega_k \approx \omega$, effectively turning the geometric observables into a spectroscopy of the memory spectrum.
  • The construction suggests a design principle for experiments: choose any flow with two noncommuting generators and any causal kernel with characteristic time $\tau_m$, and the same master curve $F(x)$ should appear; systematic deviation would signal either kernel structure beyond a single memory time or an additional physical mechanism.
  • The same causal-reconstruction step could be ported to other memory-bearing settings — turbulent dispersion with memory kernels, active matter with emergent memory, or quantum process tensors — wherever a causal kernel replaces an instantaneous generator, the noncommutativity–curvature–holonomy chain should reappear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that finite memory itself generates the geometry of transport. It replaces the instantaneous velocity gradient by a memory-dependent connection A_m(t)=∫K(τ)∇u(t−τ)dτ, defines curvature as the commutator [A_m(t1),A_m(t2)], and claims that the ordered evolution of A_m produces holonomy and irreversible Lagrangian transport even in time-periodic, irrotational flows, without vorticity, constitutive nonlinearities, stochastic forcing, or explicit symmetry breaking. Analytical results for monochromatic forcing give the universal response F(x)=x^2/(1+x^2) for the displacement and an invariant I_m∝(x/(1+x^2))^2 with x=ωτ_m. Numerical simulations are reported to show a universal collapse, a saturation regime, and an emergent geometric memory scale τ_c≈13.9.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, the paper would offer a conceptually novel bridge between memory and differential geometry in fluid transport, with explicit closed-form predictions that are in principle testable. The derivation of A_m and the curvature for the exponential kernel in Section 6 is explicit and self-contained, and Theorem S5 gives a clear algebraic criterion for vanishing curvature. These are genuine strengths. However, the central mechanism is not supported: the Markovian limit does not eliminate noncommutativity for the paper's own flow, and the analytic invariant and the numerical saturation curve are mutually inconsistent. The claimed geometric universality is therefore not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, §3.2] The Markovian-limit argument is incorrect. Equation (1) gives A_m(t)=∫K(τ)∇u(t−τ)dτ, so as K(τ)→δ(τ) one obtains A_m(t)→∇u(t). For the paper's own monochromatic flow ∇u(t)=A cosωt+B sinωt, ∇u(t) is time-dependent, and therefore [A_m(t1),A_m(t2)]=[A,B] sinω(t1−t2) is generally nonzero in the Markovian limit whenever A and B do not commute. The statement in §3.1 that 'when the transport connection becomes local in time, successive infinitesimal generators coincide and their commutator vanishes identically' conflates locality in time with time-independence. Consequently Ω2=(1/2)∫dt1∫dt2 R(t1,t2) does not vanish as K→δ for this flow, and the claim that noncommutativity is a manifestation of finite memory collapses: the noncommutativity is already present in the instantaneous velocity-gradient field, and memory only rescales it by the factor ωτ_m/(1+(ωτ_m)^2) derived in §6. Theorem S5 correctly states that curvature requires at least two noncommuting modes, but the monochromatic driving supplies those modes even with zero memory.
  2. [§6 and §9.3] The analytical invariant derived in §6, I_m=(I0/2)(ωτ_m/(1+(ωτ_m)^2))^2, is nonmonotonic in x=ωτ_m: it increases for x<1, peaks at x=1, and tends to zero as x→∞. The numerically computed averaged invariant in Fig. 8 is reported to increase monotonically with τ_m and to saturate according to the exponential law <I_m>=A(1−exp(−τ_m/τ_c)) with A≈0.218 in Fig. 9. These two behaviors are incompatible over the long-memory range, so the numerical data cannot be said to confirm the analytical universal scaling law. Moreover, the normalized response F(x)=x^2/(1+x^2) in §4 is monotonic, whereas the invariant scaling from §6 is x^2/(1+x^2)^2; the paper does not reconcile these different functional forms.
  3. [§9.3 and §10.2] The saturation law and the 'emergent geometric memory scale' τ_c≈13.9 are obtained by fitting the numerical data with an exponential function, and the fit parameters A and τ_c are then presented as predictions of the framework. Since no independent derivation of the exponential saturation law or of τ_c is given, the agreement with the fit does not provide evidence for the claimed universal geometric mechanism, and the use of the word 'emergent' overstates the theoretical status of τ_c.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.1] The memory kernel is written in different notations (K and calligraphic K) in Eq. (1) and in later sections; one consistent notation should be used throughout.
  2. [§9.3] The numerical section does not state the values of A, B, ω, or T used to produce Figs. 1–11; without these parameters, the reported fits A≈0.218 and τ_c≈13.9 cannot be reproduced or checked.
  3. [Supplemental Material S6.1] There is a typo in the definition of the discrete grid: 'ordered pair of transport times (t1, t1)' should read (t_i, t_j).
  4. [References] Reference [42] is a self-citation to the companion paper from which the displacement scaling is taken; the precise logical dependence of the present derivation on that paper should be clarified in the text.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the emergent saturation scale τc is a fit renamed as a prediction, and the universal response F(x) is carried by a same-author self-citation rather than by the present derivation.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 9.3 (Fig. 9), Section 10.2; abstract predictions (iv)]
    "The numerical data are accurately described by the exponential law throughout the investigated interval (A ≃ 0.218, τc ≃ 13.9). The fitting parameter τc introduces naturally an emergent geometric memory scale that characterizes the transition from the rapid-growth regime to asymptotic saturation. It therefore constitutes a new emergent geometric observable generated by the reconstruction itself."

    The abstract presents the framework as one that 'identifies a characteristic memory scale (τc) separating rapid geometric accumulation from asymptotic saturation.' In Section 9.3, τc and the saturation law are obtained by fitting the numerical <Im> data to <Im> = A(1 − exp(−τm/τc)); Section 10.2 then promotes the fitted value τc ≃ 13.9 to an 'emergent' geometric observable that is 'not introduced phenomenologically.' The claimed prediction of saturation and of a characteristic memory scale is therefore the fitting assumption itself: the numerical confirmation reduces to the exponential form chosen for the fit rather than following from the transport-geometry derivation.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 5.4 (Sm equation), Section 4.1 (F(x)), reference [42]]
    "The accumulated displacement consequently admits the normalized representation ∆γ = ∆γmax F(x), with F(x) = x2/(1+x2) ... the universal response function governing the observable displacement derive d previously [42]."

    The paper's headline universal scaling law F(x) = x²/(1+x²) is introduced in Section 4.1 as a normalized representation and then, in Section 5.4, explicitly attributed to the same author's earlier arXiv preprint [42] rather than derived from the present framework. The only closed-form geometric invariant computed in Section 6 is Im = I0/2 [ωτm/(1+(ωτm)²)]², which has a different functional form, x²/(1+x²)², and vanishes rather than saturating as ωτm → ∞. Thus the central scaling and saturation prediction are carried by a load-bearing self-citation, not by the derivation in this paper.

full rationale

The formal machinery in the paper — causal reconstruction Am(t), the Magnus expansion, the curvature operator R = [Am(t1),Am(t2)], and the exponential-kernel evaluation Am(t) and R — is derived from stated definitions and is not circular. The analytic computation of Section 6 is self-contained. However, two of the headline predictions do reduce to their inputs. First, the characteristic memory scale τc ≃ 13.9 is obtained by fitting <Im> to the exponential saturation law, yet the abstract lists such a scale as a prediction and Section 10.2 calls it an emergent geometric observable; the saturation confirmation is the fit. Second, the universal response F(x) = x²/(1+x²) is asserted in Section 4.1 and explicitly sourced to the same-author preprint [42] in Section 5.4, while the paper's own Section 6 calculation gives the different, non-saturating form x²/(1+x²)². These are specific reductions of claimed predictions to a fit and to a self-citation. A separate correctness risk, not counted as circularity, is the Section 3.1 Markovian-limit premise: for the paper's own monochromatic flow ∇u(t) = A cos ωt + B sin ωt, K → δ gives Am(t) = ∇u(t), which remains time-dependent, so [Am(t1),Am(t2)] = [A,B] sin ω(t1−t2) is generally nonzero; the claim that memory is the origin of noncommutativity is therefore not established by the paper's equations. Because the central curvature construction is genuinely derived while the saturation scale and universal response are fitted or self-cited, the overall circularity score is 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The analytical scaling F(x)=x^2/(1+x^2) is parameter-free once the kernel and forcing are chosen. The only genuinely fitted numbers are the saturation amplitude A approx 0.218 and the scale tau_c approx 13.9 in the exponential fit, plus an arbitrary reference memory time. These fitted constants carry the claimed saturation and emergent-scale results, not the derivation. The axioms include a false identification of the Markovian limit with a time-independent generator, which is the load-bearing step behind the entire geometric-origin claim.

free parameters (3)
  • saturation amplitude A = 0.218
    Fitted to <I_m>(tau_m) in Fig 9 with an exponential law; presented as universal amplitude but not derived from theory.
  • emergent geometric memory scale tau_c = 13.9
    Fitted in Fig 9; called an emergent geometric observable, but it is a free parameter of the assumed saturation law.
  • reference memory time tau_ref = 1
    Chosen ad hoc in Fig 3 to define the curvature difference delta_R=R(tau_m)-R(tau_ref).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The memory kernel is causal, normalized to integral K = 1, and has a finite characteristic memory time tau_m.
    Eq. (1); foundational for the reconstruction, but no derivation from fluid mechanics.
  • domain assumption Infinitesimal displacements evolve by delta_x_dot(t)=A_m(t) delta_x(t), with A_m the reconstructed connection.
    Section 2.2; defines the transport law on which the geometry is built.
  • ad hoc to paper In the Markovian limit K to delta, successive transport generators coincide and curvature vanishes.
    Sections 3.1-3.2; false for time-periodic grad u and load-bearing for the claim that memory is the geometric origin.
  • ad hoc to paper The averaged geometric invariant follows the saturation law <I_m>(tau_m)=A(1-exp(-tau_m/tau_c)).
    Section 9.3; chosen for the fit, contradicts the analytic scaling, and turns tau_c into a fitted constant.
  • domain assumption Results for monochromatic forcing generalize to arbitrary time-dependent velocity gradients without changing the universal response.
    Sections 6 and 10; asserted without proof.
invented entities (1)
  • Emergent geometric memory scale tau_c
    purpose: Characterizes the crossover from rapid geometric accumulation to saturation and is claimed as a new geometric observable.
    It is a fitted parameter (about 13.9) of an assumed exponential law; no falsifiable prediction outside the fit is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Memory-Generated Transport Geometry: Curvature, Holonomy, and Irreversibility." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZVD5UOKG

@misc{pith2026260809607,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Memory-Generated Transport Geometry: Curvature, Holonomy, and Irreversibility},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZVD5UOKG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09607}
}
read the original abstract

Memory is traditionally incorporated into transport theory as a constitutive correction acting on an already prescribed kinematic structure. Here we develop a different framework in which finite memory itself generates the geometry of transport. By reconstructing deformation from causal transport histories, the instantaneous velocity gradient is replaced by a memory-dependent transport connection whose ordered evolution gives rise to noncommutativity, curvature, and holonomy in transport-history space. We show that finite memory generates a nonvanishing geometric contribution to transport even in time-periodic, irrotational flows, providing a purely kinematic mechanism for irreversible Lagrangian transport without invoking vorticity, constitutive nonlinearities, stochastic forcing, or explicit symmetry breaking. We introduce an intrinsic curvature invariant, independent of the transport representation that measures the accumulated geometric structure generated by transport history. The framework predicts universal scaling governed by the dimensionless parameter (\omega\tau_m), identifies a characteristic memory scale (tau_c) separating rapid geometric accumulation from asymptotic saturation, and reveals a monotonically decreasing memory susceptibility with globally concave accumulation dynamics. Numerical simulations confirm these predictions and show that geometric irreversibility emerges through progressive curvature accumulation rather than resonance-driven amplification. These results establish finite memory as a generator of an intrinsic geometric structure rather than merely a modifier of dynamical evolution, revealing causal history as the microscopic origin of curvature, holonomy, and irreversible transport across a broad class of non-Markovian systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics , 2nd ed. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987)

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    G. K. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1967)

    work page 1967

  3. [3]

    Truesdell and W

    C. Truesdell and W. Noll, The Non-Linear Field Theories of Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    On the Dynamical Theory of Gases,

    J. C. Maxwell, "On the Dynamical Theory of Gases," Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 157, 49–88 (1867)

    work page

  5. [5]

    Stress-Deformation Relations for Isotropic Materials,

    R. S. Rivlin and J. L. Ericksen, "Stress-Deformation Relations for Isotropic Materials," J. Rational Mech. Anal. 4, 323–425 (1955)

    work page 1955

  6. [6]

    On the Formulation of Rheological Equations of State,

    J. G. Oldroyd, "On the Formulation of Rheological Equations of State," Proc. R. Soc. London A 200, 523–541 (1950)

    work page 1950

  7. [7]

    R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassager, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Vol. 1, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [8]

    Transport, Collective Motion, and Brownian Motion,

    H. Mori, "Transport, Collective Motion, and Brownian Motion," Prog. Theor. Phys. 33, 423 (1965)

    work page 1965

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Memory Effects in Irreversible Thermodynamics,

    R. Zwanzig, "Memory Effects in Irreversible Thermodynamics," Phys. Rev. 124, 983 (1961)

    1961

  2. [10]

    Zwanzig, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001)

    R. Zwanzig, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    Keeling, E

    J. Keeling, E. M. Stoudenmire, M. C. Bañuls, and D. R. Reichman, Process tensor approaches to non-Markovian quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 16, 020502 (2026)

    2026

  4. [12]

    Prigogine, From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences (W

    I. Prigogine, From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1980)

    1980

  5. [13]

    Prigogine and I

    I. Prigogine and I. Stengers, Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature (Bantam Books, New York, 1984)

    1984

  6. [14]

    S. R. de Groot and P. Mazur, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 1984)

    1984

  7. [15]

    Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems,

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, "Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems," Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Anomalous diffusion in coupled viscoelastic media: A fractional Langevin equation approach,

    C. Lim and J. H. Jeon, "Anomalous diffusion in coupled viscoelastic media: A fractional Langevin equation approach," Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043356 (2025). 48

    2025

  9. [17]

    Sandev, A

    T. Sandev, A. Iomin, J. Kurths, and L. Kocarev, Shear-driven anomalous diffusion: Memory effects and stochastic resetting, Phys. Fluids 37, 064101 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Tunable non-Markovian dynamics in a collision model: An application to coherent transport,

    S. Rijavec and G. Di Pietra, "Tunable non-Markovian dynamics in a collision model: An application to coherent transport," New J. Phys. 27, 043003 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    K. I. Mazzitello, D. G. Zarlenga, and C. M. Arizmendi, Memory-induced transport and arrest in flashing ratchets: From superdiffusion to clustering, Soft Matter 10, 12 (2026)

    2026

  12. [20]

    Generalized master equations leading to completely positive dynamics,

    B. Vacchini, "Generalized master equations leading to completely positive dynamics," Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 230401 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Sandev, L

    T. Sandev, L. Kocarev, and R. Metzler, Anomalous diffusion and fluctuations in complex systems and networks, Chaos 36, 013101 (2026)

    2026

  14. [22]

    M. K. Wiśniewski, J. Łuczka, and J. M. Spiechowicz, Effective mass approach to memory in non-Markovian systems, Phys. Rev. E 109, 044101 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    M. K. Wiśniewski, J. Łuczka, and J. M. Spiechowicz, Memory corrections to Markovian Langevin dynamics, Entropy 26, 380 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Non-Markovian route to coherence in heterogeneous diffusive systems,

    A. Sarkar, "Non-Markovian route to coherence in heterogeneous diffusive systems," Phys. Rev. E 112, 054117 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Construction of coarse-grained molecular dynamics with many-body non-Markovian memory,

    L. Lyu and H. Lei, "Construction of coarse-grained molecular dynamics with many-body non-Markovian memory," Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 177301 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Non-Markovian effects in nonequilibrium systems,

    S. A. Loos and A. Godec, "Non-Markovian effects in nonequilibrium systems," J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58, 220301 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Non-Markovian modeling of nonequilibrium fluctuations and dissipation in active viscoelastic biomatter,

    A. Abbasi, R. R. Netz, and A. Naji, "Non-Markovian modeling of nonequilibrium fluctuations and dissipation in active viscoelastic biomatter," Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 228202 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Emergent memory from tapping collisions in active granular matter,

    L. Caprini et al., "Emergent memory from tapping collisions in active granular matter," Commun. Phys. 7, 52 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Geometric foundation of nonequilibrium transport: A Minkowski embedding of Markov dynamics,

    D. Andrieux, "Geometric foundation of nonequilibrium transport: A Minkowski embedding of Markov dynamics," Phys. Rev. E 111, 054109 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Thermodynamic geometry of nonequilibrium fluctuations in cyclically driven transport,

    Z. Wang and J. Ren, "Thermodynamic geometry of nonequilibrium fluctuations in cyclically driven transport," Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 207101 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Analytical and geometric foundations and modern applications of kinetic equations and optimal transport,

    C. Barbachoux and J. Kouneiher, "Analytical and geometric foundations and modern applications of kinetic equations and optimal transport," Axioms 14, 350 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Beyond linear response: Equivalence between thermodynamic geometry and optimal transport,

    A. Zhong and M. R. DeWeese, "Beyond linear response: Equivalence between thermodynamic geometry and optimal transport," Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 057102 (2024). 49

    2024

  25. [33]

    Nonlinear transport in non-centrosymmetric systems,

    M. Suárez-Rodríguez, F. De Juan, I. Souza, M. Gobbi, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso, "Nonlinear transport in non-centrosymmetric systems," Nat. Mater. 24, 1005 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Unified geometric framework for nonequilibrium protocol optimization,

    S. Chennakesavalu and G. M. Rotskoff, "Unified geometric framework for nonequilibrium protocol optimization," Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 107101 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Quantum geometry induced third-order nonlinear transport responses,

    D. Mandal, S. Sarkar, K. Das, and A. Agarwal, "Quantum geometry induced third-order nonlinear transport responses," Phys. Rev. B 110, 195131 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Generalized hydrodynamics: A perspective,

    B. Doyon, S. Gopalakrishnan, F. Møller, J. Schmiedmayer, and R. Vasseur, "Generalized hydrodynamics: A perspective," Phys. Rev. X 15, 010501 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes,

    M. V. Berry, "Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes," Proc. R. Soc. London A 392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  30. [38]

    Angle Variable Holonomy in Adiabatic Excursion of an Integrable Hamiltonian,

    J. H. Hannay, "Angle Variable Holonomy in Adiabatic Excursion of an Integrable Hamiltonian," J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18, 221 (1985)

    1985

  31. [39]

    Shapere and F

    A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, eds., Geometric Phases in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989)

    1989

  32. [40]

    Kobayashi and K

    S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol. I (Wiley, New York, 1963)

    1963

  33. [41]

    Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd ed

    M. Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd ed. (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 2003)

    2003

  34. [42]

    (See below the Supplemental Material) 50 Supplemental Material Geometric Foundations of Memory-Generated Transport Geometry S1

    Kassmi, M., Memory-induced curvature drives irreversible transport in irrotational flows, arXiv:2604.08599 (2026). (See below the Supplemental Material) 50 Supplemental Material Geometric Foundations of Memory-Generated Transport Geometry S1. Tensorial Formulation of Memory-De...

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.