Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Baryogenesis and CMB spectral distortion from Axions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An axion-like particle can generate the observed baryon asymmetry and a distinctive low-frequency CMB distortion.

desk verdict Kinetic-misalignment baryogenesis is plausible and worth a referee; the CMB low-frequency plateau is an artifact of an invalid expansion and should not be published as is. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10633 v1 pith:UHJETEK3 submitted 2026-08-11 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th

Zhenhao Zhang , Mingqiu Li , Sichun Sun This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COgr-qchep-th PACS 98.80.Cq14.80.Va98.70.Vc
keywords axion-likeparticlebaryogenesisCMBspectraldistortionkineticmisalignmentChern-SimonscouplinghypermagnetichelicityhyperchargegaugefieldBose-Einsteindistribution
topics Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry
open problems Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a baryogenesis mechanism driven by an axion-like particle (ALP) coupled to the Standard Model hypercharge gauge field through a parity-violating Chern-Simons term. Because the axion background splits the dispersion relations of the two circular polarizations, the equilibrium Bose-Einstein occupancy of those modes becomes slightly asymmetric, producing a nonzero hyperelectric-hypermagnetic helicity density $\langle E\cdot B\rangle$. Through the Standard Model anomaly, that helicity sources baryon number, and in the kinetic-misalignment scenario the resulting asymmetry can reach the observed $n_B/s \approx 9\times10^{-11}$ for axion decay constants near $10^9$ GeV and initial temperatures around $10^6$ GeV, while evading CAST and related bounds. The paper also derives a CMB spectral distortion from the axion-photon coupling that approaches a constant at low frequencies, a shape qualitatively different from the standard $\mu$- and $y$-type distortions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the helicity asymmetry of the gauge field induced by the axion's Chern-Simons coupling, quantified by the pseudoscalar $\langle E\cdot B\rangle$, which equals minus half the time derivative of the magnetic helicity density. The machinery has four parts: the axion-modified dispersion relation $\omega_\pm \approx k/a \mp \beta_1\dot{\phi}/(2 f_a)$ for the two circular polarizations; the assumption of thermal equilibrium, so the occupation functions $f_\pm$ are Bose-Einstein distributions expanded to first order in the frequency shift; the momentum integral that converts the occupation asymmetry into $\langle E\cdot B\rangle = -\beta_1 T^3/(12 f_a)\, d(\dot{\phi}/T)/dt$; and the Standard Model baryon-number anomaly equation $\partial_\mu J_B^\mu = -N_F/(32\pi^2)\, g_Y^2 Y_{\mu\nu}\tilde{Y}^{\mu\nu}$, which turns this pseudoscalar into baryon production. Applied to photons after electroweak symmetry breaking, the same dispersion splitting produces the CMB distortion.

What would settle it

Solve the Boltzmann equation for the $U(1)_Y$ gauge-field occupation numbers with the axion source term and Standard Model collisions: if the steady-state distribution deviates from the instantaneous Bose-Einstein form (7) enough to change the momentum integral in Eq. (8), the predicted baryon asymmetry does not follow; a low-frequency CMB measurement looking for the predicted $\epsilon^2 I_0$ plateau would test the distortion part.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a homogeneous, evolving axion background with Chern-Simons coupling to $U(1)_Y$ modifies the hypercharge gauge field dispersion relation to $\omega_\pm \approx k/a \mp \beta_1\dot{\phi}/(2 f_a)$, and that in thermal equilibrium this splitting imprints an asymmetry in the Bose-Einstein occupation numbers of the two helicity modes. The resulting expectation value $\langle E\cdot B\rangle = -\beta_1 T^3/(12 f_a)\, d(\dot{\phi}/T)/dt$ feeds the Standard Model anomaly equation and gives the baryon number change $a^3(t_f)n_B(t_f)-a^3(t_i)n_B(t_i)=\beta_1 N_f g_Y^2 (aT)^3/(96\pi^2 f_a)(\dot{\phi}_i/T_i-\dot{\phi}_f/T_f)$. In the kinetic misalignment mechanism, where the axion momentum $Y_{PQ}$ is constant, this becomes $n_B/s = \beta_1 N_f g_Y^2 Y_{PQ}/(96\pi^2 f_a^2)(T_i^2-T_f^2)$, and the observed asymmetry is reached for natural parameter choices with $f_a\sim10^9$ GeV, $T_i\sim10^6$ GeV, $\beta_1\sim0.1$, and $Y_{PQ}\sim40$. After electroweak symmetry breaking, the same axion-photon coupling shifts photon dispersion relations and produces a spectral distortion $\delta I_a$ that saturates at $\epsilon^2 I_0$ in the low-frequency limit, unlike $y$ and $\mu$ distortions that vanish there.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the hypercharge gauge fields remain in thermal equilibrium with their axion-shifted frequencies throughout the relevant epoch, so their occupation numbers are exactly the instantaneous Bose-Einstein distributions used to compute $\langle E\cdot B\rangle$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mechanism is correct, the baryon asymmetry is set by the axion kinetic charge normalized by the decay constant, so the observed $n_B/s$ and the dark-matter abundance from kinetic misalignment become linked predictions.
  • The mechanism operates only through the $U(1)_Y$ gauge field before the electroweak crossover; for axion masses above about $1.1\times10^{-4}$ eV the traditional misalignment picture fails because $\dot{\phi}$ oscillates and averages to zero, leaving kinetic misalignment as the viable production channel.
  • The CMB distortion from axions is positive at all frequencies and tends to $\epsilon^2 I_0$ as $\nu\to0$, providing a qualitative signature that separates it from $\mu$- and $y$-distortions, which vanish at low frequency.
  • The parameter scan identifies regions with $f_a$ between $10^8$ and $10^{11}$ GeV and $T_i$ between $10^5$ and $10^7$ GeV that reach $n_B/s\approx10^{-10}$ while respecting CAST, horizontal-branch, X-ray, and photon-decay constraints.
  • Because $\delta I_a \propto \dot{\phi}_{\rm rec}^2$, the distortion is insensitive to the sign of the axion velocity and remains positive even if the axion background is spatially inhomogeneous.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The predicted low-frequency plateau in $\delta I_a$ offers a direct observational target: a future CMB spectrometer operating below a few GHz could search for a frequency-independent offset that no known $\mu$- or $y$-type foreground produces; this test is my inference, since the paper only notes the shape difference.
  • The thermal-equilibrium assumption could be checked with a Boltzmann-equation treatment that includes the axion source term alongside number-conserving collisions; the paper's Eq. (8) is the adiabatic limit, and a full calculation would reveal whether corrections are suppressed by the small ratios of the axion-driven pumping rate to the collision rate.
  • The paper defers the $SU(2)_L$ gauge-field contribution, which could be comparable to or larger than the $U(1)_Y$ contribution because the weak coupling is order unity; including it could shift the viable parameter region for reaching $n_B/s\sim10^{-10}$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that a homogeneous rolling axion-like particle modifies the dispersion relation of U(1)_Y gauge fields, generating a nonzero ⟨E·B⟩ in a thermal plasma, which through the chiral anomaly sources a baryon asymmetry. The authors derive an analytic relation between n_B/s and axion parameters, conclude that the traditional misalignment mechanism cannot reach the observed asymmetry, and show that the kinetic misalignment mechanism can, for example with fa∼10^9 GeV, Ti∼10^6 GeV, and β1∼0.1. The paper also computes a CMB spectral distortion from the axion-photon coupling, claiming that the distortion approaches a constant ε^2 I0 at low frequencies, in contrast to the conventional y- and μ-type distortions.

Significance. If the baryogenesis mechanism is correct, it is a useful addition to the axion-induced baryogenesis literature: it provides an explicit, parameter-free relation between n_B/s and the axion background, Eq. (17), and the parameter scan in Figs. 2–3 is straightforward and uses current constraints such as CAST. The CMB distortion, if valid, would be a new spectral shape. However, the advertised low-frequency plateau is not a valid limit of the model as presented, and the baryogenesis estimate relies on a strong, unproven thermal-equilibrium assumption. The algebra from Eq. (4) to Eq. (8) and from Eq. (11) to Eq. (17) is internally consistent under the stated assumptions, and the paper does not fit any constant to the observed n_B/s; the target value enters only as a benchmark in the parameter scan.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV, Eqs. (20)–(24)] The claimed low-frequency limit δI_a/I0→ε^2 is the second-order Taylor term of Eq. (20) in ε, and that expansion is valid only for x=2πν/T0 > |ε|, because f_+(x−ε) has a pole at x=ε. For the actual low-frequency region x<ε, the exact sum from Eq. (21) gives f_+ + f_− − 2/(e^x−1) ≈ −1 − 2/x, so δI_a/I0 ≈ −x^2 and tends to zero, with one helicity occupation number negative; it does not approach ε^2. The manuscript itself restricts Eq. (19) to ω≫g_aγγ φdot/2, i.e., x≫ε. Thus the plateau is at best an intermediate-frequency feature in the window ε≪x≪1, and the statement in the abstract, Section IV, and Section V that the distortion approaches a constant at low frequencies is not a valid prediction of the model. The authors should either remove the limiting claim or provide a genuine treatment of the unstable low-frequency modes.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (7); Section III, Eq. (11)] The baryogenesis derivation assumes that the U(1)_Y gauge fields remain in instantaneous thermal equilibrium with the axion-modified dispersion relation, as stated in Section II and repeated before Eq. (11), but the manuscript does not justify this against the Chern-Simons source. For the parameter region used to obtain n_B/s∼10^−10 (e.g., β1=0.1, fa=10^9 GeV, Ti=10^6 GeV), the tachyonic growth rate for the unstable helicity, β1 φdot/(2fa), is of order 10^2 GeV, far larger than the Hubble rate H∼10^−7 GeV at Ti. One therefore expects efficient gauge-field production that can drive the occupation numbers away from the Bose-Einstein form and backreact on φdot through Eq. (12). Since Eq. (8) and hence Eq. (17) are derived from the assumed instantaneous thermal distribution, the baryogenesis result is conditional on an unproven premise; the authors should estimate the thermalization rate and the occupation of produced modes, or otherwise justify why the equilibrium form persists.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The coupling term is consistently misspelled 'Chen-Simons'; it should be 'Chern-Simons'.
  2. [Section III] In the discussion around Fig. 3, 'APL' should read 'ALP'.
  3. [Section IV] The statement after Eq. (24) that δI_a is always positive is not valid at arbitrarily low frequencies, because for x<ε the exact expression contains a negative occupation number and a negative distortion that tends to zero as −x^2.
  4. [Section IV, Fig. 4] The normalization constant I0=4π(T0/(2π))^3≈270 MJy sr^−1 should be derived or referenced explicitly, since the conversion from natural units to MJy/sr is not shown.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the baryogenesis estimate follows from the stated thermal-equilibrium and dispersion assumptions, with the observed asymmetry used only as a scan target, not as an input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. Equation (8) is obtained by inserting the assumed Bose-Einstein occupation numbers (7) with the modified dispersion relation (5) into the definition of <E·B>; no observed quantity is used to fix any constant in that step. Equation (17) follows algebraically from the anomaly equation (10), the thermal-equilibrium expression (8), and the definition Y_PQ = n_PQ/s, with the observed n_B/s appearing only later as the target of parameter scans in Figs. 2 and 3. The scanned parameters (beta1, f_a, T_i, Y_PQ) are independent inputs, not fit parameters. Similarly, the CMB distortion formula (24) is the Taylor expansion of the assumed distribution (20), not a fit to the claimed constant plateau. The single overlapping-author citation, ref. [35], is used only as an example of a possible higher-scale theory above T_i and carries no load in the central derivation. The low-frequency behavior of Eq. (24) may raise a domain-of-validity question because the paper itself notes that the dispersion relation (19) holds only for omega >> g_aγγ phi_dot/2, but that is a correctness concern, not a circularity: the formula is still a direct consequence of the stated assumptions. No derivation step reduces by construction to its own inputs, so no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces; it uses the well-known axion-like particle and a standard Chern-Simons coupling. The free parameters listed are the physical parameters of the ALP model that are scanned to match the observed baryon asymmetry, not arbitrary constants fitted to data. The axioms are the standard anomaly structure of the SM and the stated assumptions about thermal equilibrium and homogeneous cosmology.

free parameters (4)
  • beta1 (ALP-hypercharge coupling) = 0.1 in the main scan
    Coupling strength in Eq (1); the paper scans values and uses beta1 = 0.1 for the Fig 2 left panel.
  • Y_PQ (PQ charge per entropy) = 40 (with resulting Omega_a = Omega_DM)
    Kinetic misalignment parameter; chosen so the axion is all of dark matter via Eq (16).
  • T_i (initial temperature of effective SM+ALP theory) = 10^5 to 10^7 GeV
    Initial temperature entering Eq (17); the paper scans it to reach n_B/s = 10^-10.
  • f_a (axion decay constant) = 10^8 to 10^11 GeV in scan
    Together with beta1 and Y_PQ sets the final asymmetry; the paper scans this range.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The Standard Model baryon number anomaly equation, Eq (9), with the hypercharge anomaly coefficient N_F g_Y^2/(32 pi^2).
    Invoked in Section III to relate baryon number production to the hypercharge Chern-Simons term.
  • domain assumption The ALP-gauge field interaction L contains -beta1 phi/(4 fa) Y tilde_Y with beta2 = 0.
    The central coupling is assumed; the paper does not derive it from a UV theory (Section II, Eq 1).
  • domain assumption Gauge fields are always in thermal equilibrium and their occupation numbers follow the modified Bose-Einstein distribution Eq (7).
    Load-bearing for Eq (8); stated explicitly in Section II.
  • domain assumption The axion background is homogeneous and evolves according to the potential V(phi) = m^2 fa^2 (1 - cos(phi/fa)) with standard misalignment or kinetic misalignment initial conditions.
    Used in Section III to evaluate phidot/T in the two scenarios.
  • domain assumption The universe is radiation-dominated with T proportional to 1/a so that x = k/(aT) is constant.
    Required to drop the time derivative of the thermal shape factor in Eq (8).
  • domain assumption The SM plus ALP is an effective theory valid only below a cutoff temperature T_i.
    Defines T_i as the initial temperature for the baryogenesis formula Eq (17); above T_i a higher-scale theory applies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Baryogenesis and CMB spectral distortion from Axions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UHJETEK3

@misc{pith2026260810633,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Baryogenesis and CMB spectral distortion from Axions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UHJETEK3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10633}
}
abstract

We discuss a mechanism for generating the baryon asymmetry in the early universe. We show that an axion-like particle can modify the related gauge field configurations in the Standard Model, thereby altering their dispersion relations. This change in the Chern-Simons number can source a violation of baryon number. We derive the relationship between the resulting baryon number and the evolution of the axion background. We estimate the baryon asymmetry produced via this mechanism and show that the observed value can be naturally achieved. We also show that axion photon coupling produces Cosmic Microwave Background spectral distortion. Our results show that the resulting distortion approaches a constant at low frequencies, unlike the conventional y-type and $\mu$-type distortions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10633 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The ϕ/˙ (faT) as temperature varying. In left panel, the oscillation temperature T∗ ≤ 159.5GeV while in right panel T∗ > 159.5GeV. We have taken θi = 1. Here Ti is the initial temperature at which our baryogenesis mechanism began to work. We should note that when the temperature is higher than Ti , the content of the universe is described by a higher-scale theory, such as the left-right symmetric model [35], SUSY mo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The final generated baryon asymmetry with different parameters. We have taken Tf = 159.5GeV. In the left plot, we have chose β1 = 0.1 and constrained YP Q by Ωa = ΩDM. The red line corresponds to nB/s = 10−10. In the right plot, we take YP Q = 40 and fa = 109GeV. The Blue line indicates the constraint gaγγ < 6.6 × 10−11GeV by CAST [37]. nB/s=10-8 nB/s=10-10 nB/s=10-11 CAST HB EBL X-rays X-ion 10-6 10-4 0.01 1 100 10… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Constraints for gaγγ. The shaded region is excluded, and these constraints are taken from the repository AxionLimits [38]. The dashed lines indicate nB/s for different gaγγ with parameters Ωa = ΩDM, Ti = 106GeV, Tf = 159.5GeV. as long as gaγγϕ˙ ≪ T. Assuming that photons are in thermal equilibrium prior to recombination, the photon distribution function is given by f±(k) = exp k aT ∓ gaγγϕ˙ 2T ! − 1 !−1 . (20) We tr… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The CMB spectral distortions. The red dashed line is spectral distortion from ALPs, while the blue and green lines are gamma distortion and µ distortion, respectively. We have normalized the spectral distortions δI by I0 = 4π(T0/(2π))3 ≈ 270MJy sr−1 . We have taken µ =…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    Spontaneous Baryogenesis from Axions with Generic Couplings

    Valerie Domcke, Yohei Ema, Kyohei Mukaida, and Masaki Yamada. Spontaneous Baryogenesis from Axions with Generic Couplings. JHEP, 08:096, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck. Astron. Astrophys., 641:A1, 2020

    2018

  3. [2]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. D , 110(3):030001, 2024

    2024

  4. [3]

    Can baryon asymmetry be explained by a large initial value before inflation? Phys

    Kai Murai, Fuminobu Takahashi, Masaki Yamada, and Wen Yin. Can baryon asymmetry be explained by a large initial value before inflation? Phys. Rev. D , 108(8):083518, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [4]

    Yanagida

    Alexander Kusenko, Kai Schmitz, and Tsutomu T. Yanagida. Leptogenesis via Axion Oscillations after Inflation. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 115(1):011302, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [5]

    Morrissey and Michael J

    David E. Morrissey and Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf. Electroweak baryogenesis. New J. Phys. , 14:125003, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [6]

    Baryogenesis via leptogenesis

    Alessandro Strumia. Baryogenesis via leptogenesis. In Les Houches Summer School on Theoretical Physics: Session 84: Particle Physics Beyond the Standard Model , pages 655–680, 8 2006

    work page 2006

  8. [7]

    Kohei Kamada and Andrew J. Long. Baryogenesis from decaying magnetic helicity. Phys. Rev. D , 94(6):063501, 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 43 references
  1. [8]

    Cosmological roles of dark photons in axion- induced electroweak baryogenesis

    Kwang Sik Jeong, Ju Hyeong Kang, and Shota Nakagawa. Cosmological roles of dark photons in axion- induced electroweak baryogenesis. JCAP, 01:047, 2025

    2025

  2. [9]

    Co and Keisuke Harigaya

    Raymond T. Co and Keisuke Harigaya. Axiogenesis. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 124(11):111602, 2020

    2020

  3. [10]

    R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn. CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 38:1440–1443, Jun 1977

    1977

  4. [11]

    R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn. Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of pseudopar- ticles. Phys. Rev. D , 16:1791–1797, Sep 1977

    1977

  5. [12]

    Search for axion-like dark matter with spin-based amplifiers

    Min Jiang, Haowen Su, Antoine Garcon, Xinhua Peng, and Dmitry Budker. Search for axion-like dark matter with spin-based amplifiers. Nature Phys. , 17(12):1402–1407, 2021

    2021

  6. [13]

    C. B. Adams et al. Axion Dark Matter. In Snowmass 2021 , 3 2022

    2021

  7. [14]

    A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck

    Enrico Pajer and Marco Peloso. A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck. Class. Quant. Grav. , 30:214002, 2013. 9

    2013

  8. [15]

    Evidence for a new light spin-zero boson from cosmological gamma-ray propagation? Phys

    Alessandro De Angelis, Marco Roncadelli, and Oriana Mansutti. Evidence for a new light spin-zero boson from cosmological gamma-ray propagation? Phys. Rev. D , 76:121301, 2007

    2007

  9. [17]

    Leptogenesis during Axion Relaxation after Inflation

    Kai Schmitz. Leptogenesis during Axion Relaxation after Inflation. In 2nd Toyama International Workshop on Higgs as a Probe of New Physics , 3 2015

    2015

  10. [18]

    A. D. Sakharov. Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe. Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. , 5:32–35, 1967

    1967

  11. [19]

    Basis invariant description of chemical equilibrium with implications for a recent axionic leptogenesis model

    Bowen Shi and Stuart Raby. Basis invariant description of chemical equilibrium with implications for a recent axionic leptogenesis model. Phys. Rev. D , 92(8):085008, 2015

    2015

  12. [20]

    Adiabatic electroweak baryogenesis driven by an axionlike particle

    Kwang Sik Jeong, Tae Hyun Jung, and Chang Sub Shin. Adiabatic electroweak baryogenesis driven by an axionlike particle. Phys. Rev. D , 101(3):035009, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Resonant production of dark photons from axions without a large coupling

    Naoya Kitajima and Fuminobu Takahashi. Resonant production of dark photons from axions without a large coupling. Phys. Rev. D , 107(12):123518, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Machado, Wolfram Ratzinger, Pedro Schwaller, and Ben A

    Camila S. Machado, Wolfram Ratzinger, Pedro Schwaller, and Ben A. Stefanek. Audible Axions. JHEP, 01:053, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Cosmic birefringence from CP-violating axion interactions

    Xuheng Luo and Anubhav Mathur. Cosmic birefringence from CP-violating axion interactions. JHEP, 08:038, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Interpreting cosmic birefringence and DESI data with evolving axion in ΛCDM

    Shota Nakagawa, Yuichiro Nakai, Yu-Cheng Qiu, and Masaki Yamada. Interpreting cosmic birefringence and DESI data with evolving axion in ΛCDM. Phys. Lett. B , 868:139774, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Sfakianakis

    Silvia Gasparotto and Evangelos I. Sfakianakis. Cosmic birefringence from the Axiverse. JCAP, 11:017, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Rotation of Linear Polarization Plane and Circular Polarization from Cosmological Pseudo-Scalar Fields

    Fabio Finelli and Matteo Galaverni. Rotation of Linear Polarization Plane and Circular Polarization from Cosmological Pseudo-Scalar Fields. Phys. Rev. D , 79:063002, 2009

    2009

  19. [27]

    Dark Matter Axions Revisited

    Luca Visinelli and Paolo Gondolo. Dark Matter Axions Revisited. Phys. Rev. D , 80:035024, 2009

    2009

  20. [28]

    Co, Lawrence J

    Raymond T. Co, Lawrence J. Hall, and Keisuke Harigaya. Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(25):251802, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    The Cosmic Microwave Background: Spectral Distortions

    Jens Chluba. The Cosmic Microwave Background: Spectral Distortions. 1 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Hooper, Julien Lesgourgues, and Jens Chluba

    Matteo Lucca, Nils Schöneberg, Deanna C. Hooper, Julien Lesgourgues, and Jens Chluba. The synergy between CMB spectral distortions and anisotropies. JCAP, 02:026, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Future Steps in Cosmology using Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Microwave Background

    Jens Chluba. Future Steps in Cosmology using Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Microwave Background. Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. Fermi , 200:265–309, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Rishi Khatri and Rashid A. Sunyaev. Beyond y and \mu: the shape of the CMB spectral distortions in the intermediate epoch, 1.5x10^4 < z < 2x10^5. JCAP, 09:016, 2012

    2012

  25. [33]

    Electroweak baryogenesis

    Mark Trodden. Electroweak baryogenesis. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 71:1463–1500, 1999

    1999

  26. [34]

    Consider a radiation dominated universe, assuming the initial misalignment θi is not too large when the initial time mti → 0, Eq

    and thus Tf ≥ 159.5GeV. Consider a radiation dominated universe, assuming the initial misalignment θi is not too large when the initial time mti → 0, Eq. ( 12) has approximate solution ϕ(t) = faθi21/4Γ 5 4 (mt)−1/4J 1 4 (mt) , (15) where J 1 4 (x) is Bessel function. Figs. 1 s...

  27. [35]

    Standard model cross-over on the lattice

    Michela D’Onofrio and Kari Rummukainen. Standard model cross-over on the lattice. Phys. Rev. D , 93(2):025003, 2016

    2016

  28. [36]

    Prospects of gravitational waves in the minimal left-right symmetric model

    Mingqiu Li, Qi-Shu Yan, Yongchao Zhang, and Zhijie Zhao. Prospects of gravitational waves in the minimal left-right symmetric model. JHEP, 03:267, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    The Minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM)

    Csaba Csaki. The Minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). Mod. Phys. Lett. A , 11:599, 1996

    1996

  30. [38]

    Anastassopoulos et al

    V. Anastassopoulos et al. New CAST Limit on the Axion-Photon Interaction. Nature Phys. , 13:584–590, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    Ciaran O’Hare. cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits. https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Revisiting the bound on axion-photon coupling from Globular Clusters

    Adrian Ayala, Inma Domínguez, Maurizio Giannotti, Alessandro Mirizzi, and Oscar Straniero. Revisiting the bound on axion-photon coupling from Globular Clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 113(19):191302, 2014

    2014

  33. [41]

    Overduin and P

    James M. Overduin and P. S. Wesson. Dark matter and background light. Phys. Rept., 402:267–406, 2004

    2004

  34. [42]

    D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, John C. Mather, R. A. Shafer, and E. L. Wright. The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set. Astrophys. J., 473:576, 1996

    1996

  35. [43]

    Kogut, M

    A. Kogut, M. H. Abitbol, J. Chluba, J. Delabrouille, D. Fixsen, J. C. Hill, S. P. Patil, and A. Rotti. CMB Spectral Distortions: Status and Prospects. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. , 51(7):113, 2019

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.