Two-component ultracold Bose gases with spin-orbit coupling

G. I. Martone; S. Stringari

Two-component ultracold Bose gases with spin-orbit coupling

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Raman-induced spin-orbit coupling in a two-component Bose-Einstein condensate produces a three-phase ground-state diagram whose stripe phase is a supersolid with a spin Goldstone mode.

desk verdict Solid, honest lecture notes that consolidate the field accurately; no new results, but a fair and useful pedagogical review that deserves referee time as a review article. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10722 v1 pith:QQI274VE submitted 2026-08-11 cond-mat.quant-gas

G. I. Martone , S. Stringari This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.quant-gas

keywords spin-orbit-coupledBose-EinsteincondensateRaman-inducedspin-orbitcouplingstripephasesupersolidplane-wavesingle-minimumsuperfluiddensitymagneticsusceptibility

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

These lecture notes establish the mean-field picture of a two-component Bose-Einstein condensate with Raman-induced spin-orbit coupling, a laser-induced coupling between an atom's momentum and its internal spin state. The single-particle energy spectrum has a double-minimum shape, and weak contact interactions pick among three ground states: a density-modulated stripe phase, a plane-wave phase with uniform density and finite momentum, and a single-minimum phase with zero momentum. The stripe phase is the focus because it is a supersolid, a state with crystal order and superfluid flow at the same time, and its low-energy crystal Goldstone mode has a spin character. The notes also derive an identity tying the superfluid density along the spin-orbit direction to the magnetic susceptibility, so that the superfluid weight is suppressed and vanishes at the plane-wave-to-single-minimum transition. If these claims hold, spin-orbit-coupled Bose gases are a tunable setting for studying supersolidity and anisotropic superfluidity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the single-particle dispersion $\varepsilon_\pm(p)$ of the Raman Hamiltonian, whose lower branch has two degenerate minima for $\hbar\Omega_R<4E_R$; interactions then decide how the two minima are occupied. The argument is carried by the variational Ansatz $\Psi_0(\mathbf{r})=\sqrt{\bar n}(C_+(\cos\vartheta,-\sin\vartheta)^T e^{ik_1x}+C_-(-\sin\vartheta,\cos\vartheta)^T e^{-ik_1x})$, a superposition of two counterpropagating plane waves whose occupations $|C_\pm|^2$ distinguish the stripe, plane-wave, and single-minimum phases. The central identity connecting statics and dynamics is the magnetic susceptibility $\chi_M$, defined as the response of the spin polarization to a weak spin-dependent field; it diverges at the second-order transition (Eqs. (11)-(12)) and enters both the effective mass $m^*/m=1+2E_R\chi_M$ and the superfluid density $\rho_s^x/\rho=1/(1+2E_R\chi_M)$. In the stripe phase the key mechanism is a spin-phonon Goldstone mode: the gapless spin branch of the Bogoliubov spectrum corresponds to rigid translational motion of the density stripes, revealing the crystal character at low frequencies.

What would settle it

Solve the full interacting wave equation numerically without the two-plane-wave Ansatz for the same parameters used in Fig. 2; if it yields no stripe phase, a different phase-boundary shape, or a superfluid density along the spin-orbit direction that does not follow $1/(1+2E_R\chi_M)$ near the plane-wave/single-minimum transition, the central claim is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for zero detuning and equal intraspecies scattering lengths, the mean-field ground state of a spin-orbit-coupled BEC is captured by a variational superposition of two counterpropagating plane waves, and minimizing the energy of that Ansatz produces a three-phase diagram. At low Raman coupling the condensate forms a stripe phase with density fringes of wavelength $\pi/k_1$ and zero spin polarization; raising the coupling drives a first-order transition to a plane-wave phase with uniform density and nonzero momentum, then a second-order transition to a single-minimum phase. The stripe phase is identified as a supersolid: it spontaneously breaks both phase symmetry and translation symmetry, and its Bogoliubov spectrum has two gapless branches in which the Goldstone mode associated with stripe motion has a spin character. A quantitative highlight is Eq. (24), $\rho_s^x/\rho = 1/(1+2E_R\chi_M)$: the superfluid density along the spin-orbit direction is reduced below the total density because the magnetic susceptibility $\chi_M$ diverges at the plane-wave/single-minimum transition, and the same quantity controls the effective mass $m^*/m = 1+2E_R\chi_M$ when $g_{ss}=0$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ground state can be described by a fixed superposition of two counterpropagating plane waves, which Section 4 concedes is not an exact solution of the interacting wave equation once both density and spin interactions are present, together with the assumptions of zero Raman detuning and equal intraspecies scattering lengths.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The three-phase diagram means a single experimental knob, the Raman coupling, can tune a Bose gas through a supersolid stripe phase, a uniform finite-momentum plane-wave phase, and a uniform zero-momentum single-minimum phase.
The plane-wave-to-single-minimum transition is second order: the magnetic susceptibility diverges there, and sound velocities along the spin-orbit direction plus the dipole-mode frequency are strongly suppressed as the transition is approached.
The superfluid density along the spin-orbit direction is smaller than the total density even at zero temperature, and it can be measured from the ratio of longitudinal to transverse sound velocities.
In the stripe phase the Bogoliubov spectrum has two gapless branches; one is a spin Goldstone mode that moves the stripes rigidly, and it can be excited by a sudden change of the magnetic detuning.
Approaching the plane-wave-to-stripe transition, a roton-maxon minimum softens in the plane-wave spectrum, signaling the onset of crystalline order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the superfluid-density identity (24) holds beyond the regimes already probed, measuring the magnetic susceptibility through dipole oscillations gives a direct readout of the superfluid fraction in any spin-orbit-coupled configuration.
The spin character of the stripe Goldstone mode suggests that spin-sensitive probes can resolve the shear-like motion of the stripes, not just their density modulation, offering a way to measure the elastic properties of the supersolid.
Because the variational Ansatz assumes zero detuning and equal intraspecies scattering lengths, the quantitative critical couplings (9) and (10) are specialized predictions; generic mixtures with unequal intraspecies interactions may show a direct stripe-to-single-minimum transition and a shifted tricritical point.
The same double-minimum mechanism should produce an analogous suppression of the superfluid density in shaken-lattice systems, where an effective double-minimum dispersion is engineered without Raman coupling.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know upfront: this is explicitly lecture notes, not a research paper. There is no new claim to accept or reject, and the reader's UNVERDICTED verdict is right. That said, the paper does its job well. It gives a clear, self-consistent account of the Raman-induced SOC phase diagram, the Bogoliubov spectrum, the superfluid density suppression, and the stripe phase's supersolid character. The equations I checked are consistent with the primary literature, and the paper is unusually honest about where its main tool, the two-mode variational Ansatz (8), is approximate. The stress-test note correctly observes that the Ansatz is exact in the PW and SM phases, so the quantitative formulas for susceptibility, sound velocities, and superfluid density are not hostage to the variational approximation. In the stripe phase the authors flag the limitation and point to higher-harmonic analyses and Monte Carlo support. I found no internal inconsistency, and the citation pattern, while heavy on the authors' own work, is justified because much of the formalism indeed comes from those papers and is corroborated by independent experiments and simulations. The one weak spot I see is minor: the claim of direct fringe observation in potassium rests on a private communication [58], which is unverifiable and somewhat out of place in a review. Also, the paper is dense in places; a newcomer will need the cited references to follow derivations, but that is normal for lecture notes. Who gets value from this? Graduate students and researchers entering the field who want a single narrative connecting the single-particle physics to the many-body phases and the experimental probes. It is not a paper that advances research practice, but it is a reliable map of a mature subfield. I would bring it to a reading group for the pedagogical value, and I would cite it as a background reference in my own writing. Should it go to peer review? If the venue publishes review or lecture-note articles, yes; a serious referee can check the quoted formulas against the originals and confirm the exposition is sound. If the venue expects new results, desk reject is appropriate because there is no new claim. My recommendation: treat it as what it is, a good review, and send it to an appropriate journal for that genre.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a lecture-note-style review of two-component Bose-Einstein condensates with Raman-induced spin-orbit coupling. It introduces the single-particle Hamiltonian and its dispersion, discusses the broken Galilean, parity, and time-reversal symmetries, and then presents the mean-field ground-state phase diagram with the stripe, plane-wave, and single-minimum phases. It reviews the magnetic susceptibility, Bogoliubov spectra, hydrodynamic theory, superfluid density, moment of inertia, and the supersolid character of the stripe phase. The paper claims no new results; it synthesizes the established literature, much of it from the authors' own prior work, and frames the main physical messages as a pedagogical introduction.

Significance. As a review and lecture-note contribution, the paper fills a useful niche by collecting in one place the essential formalism and results for spin-orbit-coupled BECs: the single-particle dispersion, the three-phase diagram, the collective-mode structure, the suppression of the superfluid density, and the spin-character Goldstone mode of the stripe phase. The quoted formulas are internally consistent; in particular, Eq. (24) for the superfluid density is compatible with the sound-velocity relation (15) and the magnetic-susceptibility expressions (11)-(12). The manuscript is transparent about its assumptions: zero Raman detuning, equal intraspecies scattering lengths, and the variational two-plane-wave Ansatz (8), which it explicitly acknowledges in Sec. 4 is not an exact Gross-Pitaevskii solution in the stripe phase and supports with higher-harmonic analyses, Monte Carlo simulations, and experiments. These strengths make the review reliable as an entry point for students and researchers new to the field, even though it does not advance new results.

minor comments (3)

[§2, Eq. (3)] The notation k_1^(0) is introduced without explanation; a brief remark that the superscript (0) denotes the noninteracting value of the plane-wave wave vector would help readers who encounter this quantity before the interacting case is discussed.
[§5, just below Eq. (17)] The symbol g in the density term gn^2/2 is not defined at that point; since the paragraph assumes g_ss = 0, the symbol should be identified as g_dd from Eq. (6) to avoid confusion with the spin coupling constants.
[§7, paragraph reporting direct fringe observation] The statement that density fringes were directly observed in a spin-orbit-coupled potassium mixture cites only a private communication (Ref. [58]); for a journal review, this claim should either be updated to a published reference or explicitly marked as unpublished so that readers can assess its status.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central claims are independently derived or externally validated; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a review/lecture-note exposition, not a self-referential derivation. The phase diagram and critical couplings are obtained by explicit Gross-Pitaevskii variational minimization (Eqs. (6)-(10)) with the two-mode Ansatz (8); the paper openly states that the Ansatz is not an exact GP solution in the stripe phase and cites higher-harmonic analyses [24,25], perturbation theory [25], and quantum Monte Carlo [28] for support. In the PW and SM phases the Ansatz reduces to a single plane wave and is exact, so Eqs. (11), (12), (15), (16) and (24) do not rest on the variational approximation. Equation (24) for the superfluid density follows from a Baym sum-rule calculation with the spin-dependent current (23), and its connection to the magnetic susceptibility is a genuine linear-response relation, not a fitted input renamed as prediction. Equations (15) and (25) are independent hydrodynamic/sum-rule identities; using measured sound velocities to infer rho_s^x via Eq. (25) is a consistency procedure, not circular confirmation. The paper cites many of the authors' own earlier papers, but these are backed by independent experiments [4,12,32,36,51] and quantum Monte Carlo [28], and no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to force the chosen description. One peripheral weakness is that the recent Potassium fringe observation rests on a private communication [58], but this is not load-bearing for the central phase-diagram, superfluidity, or supersolid claims. No equation reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the mean-field Gross-Pitaevskii description, the two-plane-wave variational Ansatz, and the assumption of equal intraspecies scattering lengths with zero detuning. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The mean-field Gross-Pitaevskii equation with contact interactions (Eqs. 6-7) accurately describes the ground state and dynamics of dilute SOC BECs.
Introduced in Sec. 4. The paper argues the smallness of quantum depletion supports this (Refs. [17,27]) and cites Monte Carlo confirmation (Ref. [28]).
ad hoc to paper The variational two-plane-wave Ansatz (Eq. 8) captures the ground state of the interacting gas, despite not being an exact GP solution.
Sec. 4 states the Ansatz is not a solution unless one amplitude vanishes, yet all phase boundaries and stripe properties are derived from it.
domain assumption Equal intraspecies scattering lengths (g_ds=0) and zero Raman detuning (delta_R=0) are assumed unless otherwise stated.
Sec. 4: 'we take zero Raman detuning delta_R and equal intraspecies couplings (g_ds=0)', restricting the validity of the presented results.
domain assumption The hydrodynamic description applies only when excitation frequencies satisfy omega << Omega_R, so the relative phase is locked.
Sec. 5 states the hydrodynamic formalism is valid in this regime and is used to derive sound velocities, dipole mode, and moment of inertia.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-component ultracold Bose gases with spin-orbit coupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QQI274VE

@misc{pith2026260810722,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-component ultracold Bose gases with spin-orbit coupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QQI274VE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10722}
}

read the original abstract

These lecture notes provide an introduction to Bose-Einstein condensates with Raman-induced spin-orbit coupling. Owing to the interplay between the peculiar single-particle dispersion, featuring a double-minimum structure, and the two-body interaction, these systems possess a complex phase diagram. Three different quantum phases can be observed, i.e., a stripe, a plane-wave, and a single-minimum phase, each characterized by different broken symmetries. The condensate dynamics is also significantly affected by the spin-orbit coupling, as revealed by the behavior of the Bogoliubov spectrum in infinite systems and the behavior of the discretized collective mode frequencies in trapped configurations, especially close to the phase transitions. In turn, the superfluid and rotational properties are also deeply modified by the coupling between the motional and spin degree of freedom. Finally, a special attention is devoted to the stripe phase and its supersolid character, which can be clearly revealed by the study of its dynamic features.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10722 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** – Raman coupling vs. average density phase diagram of a BEC with SOC. The solid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** – (a) Theoretical prediction for the lower (blue solid line) and upper (red solid line) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: – Superfluid density along x of a spin-orbit-coupled BEC in the PW and SM phases as a function of the Raman coupling. The solid curve represents the theoretical prediction (25). The red circles represent experimental values deduced from Eq. (25), using the measured sou…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: – Lowest four bands of the Bogoliubov dispersion of a spin-orbit-coupled BEC in the stripe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: – Frequency of the breathing mode (ωB), the spin-dipole mode (ωSD), and the centerof-mass (dipole) mode (ωD) of a trapped spin-orbit-coupled BEC as a function of the Raman coupling. The value of each frequency is deduced by looking at the oscillations of the centerof…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

[1]

[1]Dalibard J., Gerbier F., Juzeli ¯unas G.and ¨Ohberg P.,Rev. Mod. Phys.,83(2011)

2011
[49]

[6]Zhou X., Li Y., Cai Z.andWu C.,J. Phys. B,46(2013) 134001. [7]H. Zhai,Rep. Prog. Phys.,78(2015) 026001. [8]Li Y., Martone G. I.andStringari S.,Spin-Orbit-Coupled Bose-Einstein Condensates, inAnnual Review of Cold Atoms and Moleculesedited byK. W. Madison, K. Bongs, L. D. Carr, A. M. Rey, H. Zhai(World Scientific, Singapore), Vol. 3, 2015, pp. 201-250. ...

work page 2013
[83]

B.,Nature (London),494(2013)

[5]Galitski V.andSpielman I. B.,Nature (London),494(2013)

work page 2013
[87]

[51]Putra A., Salces-C ´arcoba F., Yue Y., Sugawa S.andSpielman I. B.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,124(2020) 053605. [52]Tanzi L., Lucioni E., F am `a F., Catani J., Fioretti A., Gabbanini C., Bisset R. N., Santos L.andModugno G.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,122(2019) 130405. [53]B ¨ottcher F., Schmidt J.-N., Wenzel M., Hertkorn J., Guo M., Langen T.and Pfau T.,Phys. Rev. X,9(20...

work page 2020
[91]

I., Li Y., Pitaevskii L

[13]Martone G. I., Li Y., Pitaevskii L. P.andStringari S.,Phys. Rev. A,86(2012) 063621. [14]Bychkov Y. A.andRashba E. I.,J. Phys. C,17(1984)

work page 2012
[92]

Commun.,5(2014)

[26]Hamner C., Qu C., Zhang Y., Chang J., Gong M., Zhang C.andEngels P.,Nat. Commun.,5(2014)

work page 2014
[176]

[49]Boninsegni M.andProkof’ev N. V.,Rev. Mod. Phys.,84(2012)

work page 2012
[314]

I.andStringari S.,EPL,99(2012) 56008

[31]Li Y., Martone G. I.andStringari S.,EPL,99(2012) 56008. [32]Zhang J.-Y., Ji S.-C., Chen Z., Zhang L., Du Z.-D., Yan B., Pan G.-S., Zhao B., Deng Y.-J., Zhai H., Chen S.andPan J.-W.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,109(2012) 115301. [33]Parker C. V., Ha L.-C.andChin C.,Nat. Phys.,9(2013)

work page 2012

Show all 22 references

[382]

P., Langen T.andPfau T.,Nature (London),574(2019)

Two-component ultracold Bose gases with spin-orbit coupling21 [61]Guo M., B ¨ottcher F., Hertkorn J., Schmidt J.-N., Wenzel M., B ¨uchler H. P., Langen T.andPfau T.,Nature (London),574(2019)

2019
[386]

J., Baranov M

[62]Petter D., Patscheider A., Natale G., Mark M. J., Baranov M. A., van Bijnen R., Roccuzzo S. M., Recati A., Blakie B., Baillie D., Chomaz L.andFerlaino F., Phys. Rev. A,104(2021) L011302. [63]Geier K. T., Martone G. I., Hauke P., Ketterle W.andStringari S.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,...

2021
[403]

F.andLifshitz I

[45]Andreev A. F.andLifshitz I. M.,Sov. Phys. JETP,29(1969)

1969
[553]

C ¸ ., Su E., Lee J., Jamison A

[57]Li J., Huang W., Shteynas B., Burchesky S., Top F. C ¸ ., Su E., Lee J., Jamison A. O.andKetterle W.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,117(2016) 185301. [58]Tarruell L., private communication. [59]G. Natale, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, L. ChomazandF. Ferlain...

2016
[580]

[17]Zheng W., Yu Z.-Q., Cui X.andZhai H.,J

[16]Zhu Q., Zhang C.andWu B.,EPL,100(2012) 50003. [17]Zheng W., Yu Z.-Q., Cui X.andZhai H.,J. Phys. B,46(2013) 134007 [18]Ozawa T., Pitaevskii L. P.andStringari S.,Phys. Rev. A,87(2013) 063610. [19]Pitaevskii L. P.andStringari S.,Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity (O...

2012
[628]

B.,Nature (London),471(2011)

[4]Lin Y.-J., Jimenez-Garcia K.andSpielman I. B.,Nature (London),471(2011)

2011
[759]

[50]L ´eonard J., Morales A., Zupancic P., Esslinger T.andDonner T.,Nature (London),543(2017)

2017
[769]

W., Parker C

[34]Ha L.-C., Clark L. W., Parker C. V., Anderson B. M.andChin C.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,114(2015) 055301. [35]Zheng W.andLi Z.,Phys. Rev. A,85(2012) 053607. [36]Ji S.-C., Zhang L., Xu X.-T., Wu Z., Deng Y., Chen S.andPan J.-W.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,114(2015) 105301. [37]Khamehchi M. A.,...

2015
[1107]

[46]Leggett A. J.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,25(1970)

1970
[1191]

[48]Balibar S.,Nature (London),464(2010)

2010
[1523]

[2]Goldman N., Juzeli ¯unas G., ¨Ohberg P.andSpielman I. B.,Rep. Prog. Phys.,77 (2014) 126401. [3]Lin Y.-J., Compton R. L., Jimenez-Garcia K., Porto J. V.andSpielman I. B., Nature (London),462(2009)

2014
[1543]

A.andNepomnyashchii Y

[47]Kirzhnits D. A.andNepomnyashchii Y. A.,Sov. Phys. JETP,32(1971)

1971
[4023]

[27]Chen X.-L., W ang J., Li Y., Liu X.-J.andHu H.,Phys. Rev. A,98(2018) 013614. [28]S ´anchez-Baena J., Boronat J.andMazzanti F.,Phys. Rev. A,101(2020) 043602. [29]Yu Z.-Q.,Phys. Rev. A,90(2014) 053608. 20G. I. MartoneandS. Stringari [30]Ji S.-C., Zhang J.-Y., Zhang L., Du Z....

2018
[6039]

Rev.,100(1955)

[15]Dresselhaus G.,Phys. Rev.,100(1955)

1955

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

[1]Dalibard J., Gerbier F., Juzeli ¯unas G.and ¨Ohberg P.,Rev. Mod. Phys.,83(2011)

2011

[2] [49]

[6]Zhou X., Li Y., Cai Z.andWu C.,J. Phys. B,46(2013) 134001. [7]H. Zhai,Rep. Prog. Phys.,78(2015) 026001. [8]Li Y., Martone G. I.andStringari S.,Spin-Orbit-Coupled Bose-Einstein Condensates, inAnnual Review of Cold Atoms and Moleculesedited byK. W. Madison, K. Bongs, L. D. Carr, A. M. Rey, H. Zhai(World Scientific, Singapore), Vol. 3, 2015, pp. 201-250. ...

work page 2013

[3] [83]

B.,Nature (London),494(2013)

[5]Galitski V.andSpielman I. B.,Nature (London),494(2013)

work page 2013

[4] [87]

[51]Putra A., Salces-C ´arcoba F., Yue Y., Sugawa S.andSpielman I. B.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,124(2020) 053605. [52]Tanzi L., Lucioni E., F am `a F., Catani J., Fioretti A., Gabbanini C., Bisset R. N., Santos L.andModugno G.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,122(2019) 130405. [53]B ¨ottcher F., Schmidt J.-N., Wenzel M., Hertkorn J., Guo M., Langen T.and Pfau T.,Phys. Rev. X,9(20...

work page 2020

[5] [91]

I., Li Y., Pitaevskii L

[13]Martone G. I., Li Y., Pitaevskii L. P.andStringari S.,Phys. Rev. A,86(2012) 063621. [14]Bychkov Y. A.andRashba E. I.,J. Phys. C,17(1984)

work page 2012

[6] [92]

Commun.,5(2014)

[26]Hamner C., Qu C., Zhang Y., Chang J., Gong M., Zhang C.andEngels P.,Nat. Commun.,5(2014)

work page 2014

[7] [176]

[49]Boninsegni M.andProkof’ev N. V.,Rev. Mod. Phys.,84(2012)

work page 2012

[8] [314]

I.andStringari S.,EPL,99(2012) 56008

[31]Li Y., Martone G. I.andStringari S.,EPL,99(2012) 56008. [32]Zhang J.-Y., Ji S.-C., Chen Z., Zhang L., Du Z.-D., Yan B., Pan G.-S., Zhao B., Deng Y.-J., Zhai H., Chen S.andPan J.-W.,Phys. Rev. Lett.,109(2012) 115301. [33]Parker C. V., Ha L.-C.andChin C.,Nat. Phys.,9(2013)

work page 2012