Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 66 references

Singularities in Soft Matter Systems

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that the same four-question analysis—singularity, self-similarity, universality, and regularisation—governs every soft-matter event in which a length scale shrinks toward zero.

desk verdict A clean, well-organized review of singularity concepts in soft matter; no new results but a useful diagnostic framework, with minor verifiability caveats in Section 8 and Figure 7(c). read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11060 v1 pith:3PQYL7MD submitted 2026-08-11 cond-mat.soft physics.flu-dyn

Vatsal Sanjay This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.flu-dyn
keywords softmattersingularitiesself-similaritypinch-offcoalescencecontactlinescapillarityinterfacialflows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

When a liquid thread pinches off, the continuum description says its neck radius reaches zero in finite time while curvature diverges. This review argues that such finite-time singularities are not model defects but organising events: near the singularity the flow often forgets most of the outer geometry, becomes self-similar, and is cut off by a small-scale physical mechanism. The central claim is that identifying the shrinking length, the dominant balance, the surviving memory, and the regularising cutoff is enough to predict the measurable outputs—drop size, jet speed, wetting angle, air entrainment, rupture, or fracture. That is why the framework matters: the same diagnostic logic applies to pinch-off, coalescence, moving contact lines, cusps, thin-film rupture, elastic ridges, and active defects, even though the governing equations differ.

What carries the argument

The central object is a four-question diagnostic toolkit: Is there a singularity (a vanishing length or diverging field)? Is the local solution self-similar (do profiles collapse after rescaling)? Is it universal (has the shrinking region forgotten the outer problem)? And what regularisation (slip, intermolecular forces, thermal noise, elasticity, defect cores, or other new physics) cuts off the ideal divergence? The workhorse behind these questions is matched asymptotics: an outer problem supplies forcing and geometry, an inner problem contains the shrinking scale, and the connection between the two is summarised by a cutoff length $\ell_m$ or by a self-similar solution with a prefactor $A$, with laws such as $h_{\min}\sim A(t_0-t)^\alpha$ organising the local balance.

What would settle it

A direct observation: measure the thinning rate and profile collapse of a polymer drop with polymer relaxation time comparable to the local flow time; if the collapse and the exponent remain Newtonian, the paper's central claim that memory enters the dominant balance is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a singularity marks the scale at which a smooth continuum description stops closing on itself, and that the local dynamics near that scale are controlled by a small list of ingredients: a length that tends to zero (or a curvature, stress, or gradient that diverges), a dominant balance among inertia, viscosity, capillarity, elasticity, or activity, a self-similar profile that may or may not be universal, and a cutoff length where new physics regularises the ideal divergence. From drop and bubble pinch-off to coalescence, contact lines, cusps, jets, thin films, elastic sheets, and active defects, the review argues that these ingredients feed a matched inner–outer problem whose solution selects the observable output. A key lesson is that a power-law exponent alone is not a prediction: the same exponent can arise from different force balances, as in jets born from a collapsing cavity, and the prefactor can carry memory of initial conditions, so the full local solution and its matching to the outer flow must be computed.

Load-bearing premise

The framework presupposes that near a singularity an inner region becomes small enough and fast enough to separate cleanly from the outer flow, so the local state can be summarised by a single shrinking length and one cutoff; if polymer memory, surface-tension-gradient stress, thermal noise, or active stress enters the dominant balance before that separation is established, the clean four-way distinction stops giving quantitative predictions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pinch-off exponents by themselves do not predict drop size or satellite formation; the prefactor, the crossover between balances, and the cutoff must all be computed from the matched problem.
  • The moving-contact-line paradox is resolved by a microscopic cutoff, and the apparent contact angle depends on that cutoff only logarithmically, so wetting predictions require the matching, not just the molecular-scale physics.
  • Adding polymers arrests drop pinch-off into an elastocapillary filament but barely changes bubble pinch-off, because the two necks stretch material in different directions; the same additive can suppress one breakup and leave the other nearly unchanged.
  • Bubble-bursting jet speed is not set by the jet's own capillarity: capillary waves focusing at the cavity base select the cone angle, giving a fastest, thinnest jet only in a narrow viscosity window.
  • In printing, coating, and aerosols, satellite drops, air entrainment, and film rupture are selected by how the shrinking region is fed and by what cuts it off, so the liquid formulation, the gas, and the boundary geometry matter as much as the outer flow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework suggests a practical diagnostic for any new soft-matter failure: measure whether profiles collapse, then vary the cutoff (slip length, film thickness, particle size) and see which output tracks the cutoff; that separates retained memory from universality.
  • Universality is better treated as graded rather than binary: a solution can be self-similar yet carry a history-dependent prefactor, so experiments should report the prefactor and the decay of memory modes, not just the exponent.
  • For active nematic defects, the same toolkit implies that defect core size and activity level should set defect nucleation and annihilation rates, so tuning activity should change defect statistics in a way controlled by the cutoff.
  • For stretchable solids, the analogous claim would be that crack-tip process-zone size, rather than macroscopic loading alone, sets the failure force; this could be tested by measuring whether failure stress scales with the process-zone length across gels of different mesh sizes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review article argues that finite-time and localized singularities in soft matter share a common diagnostic structure. It introduces four concepts—singularity, self-similarity, universality, and regularization—and applies them to drop pinch-off, bubble pinch-off, coalescence, moving contact lines, cusps, thin films, jets, polymer and surfactant memory effects, soft solids, and active matter. The central claim is that for any event with a shrinking length scale, identifying the dominant balance, whether a self-similar form exists, what the inner region remembers, and which physics provides the cutoff is sufficient to predict selected outputs such as drop size, jet speed, wetting angle, and fracture outcome.

Significance. The review is best judged as a pedagogical and organizational synthesis rather than a claim of new quantitative laws. It accurately restates standard scaling laws (equations (2), (3), (5), and (8)), and it makes the conceptual distinctions among singularity, self-similarity, universality, and regularization precise and usable. The paper is unusually transparent: figure-generation scripts and data are linked in a public repository, and the text explicitly acknowledges where scale separation can fail, notably for polymer memory (De_l in Section 9) and for additional physics entering before a nominal cutoff (Section 11). These strengths make the framework credible as a review-level synthesis. The stress-test concern about scale separation is therefore not load-bearing, because the manuscript itself flags the limitation. The main caveat is that a few illustrative quantitative claims, especially the Worthington-jet exponent in Section 8, rely on same-author preprints or unpublished images; these are local and fixable, and they do not undermine the central diagnostic claim.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 8 and Section 11] The exponent α≈0.63 for Worthington jets is attributed to arXiv:2607.08972, a same-author preprint, and is stated without any caveat; please cite a peer-reviewed version if one exists, or explicitly mark the value as a preprint prediction that has not yet been independently verified.
  2. [Figure 7(c) and Section 7] The high-speed frames are unpublished personal results (credit line in the caption); the surrounding text describes the thermocapillary rupture sequence as fact, so the text should either cite a published source for this specific sequence or clearly label the panel as an illustrative personal observation.
  3. [Section 6, Eq. (7)] Equation (7) is introduced as a reduced-order viscous bending model without a derivation or citation; please either cite the source or state explicitly that it is a pedagogical construction and define all symbols and the non-dimensionalisation.
  4. [Section 1] The phrase 'familiar experiments [see figure 1 and 1–3]' is confusing; it should read 'see figure 1 and references [1–3]' or similar.
  5. [Section 5] The statement that 'the early bridge has forgotten both the microscopic initiation and the initial wedge angle' is too strong because the self-similar law h_b ≃ 0.272 θ^4 t retains the angle θ; recommend rewording to say the bridge forgets the microscopic initiation and the detailed initial geometry, with θ entering only through the scaling.
  6. [Section 8] The sentence 'the cone closes through a geometry-selected inertial similarity [43]' relies on the same preprint as the first minor comment; if the preprint remains the only source, the sentence should be qualified accordingly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The review is mostly a self-contained synthesis of external results, but the headline jet exponent α≈0.63 in Section 8 is taken from a same-author preprint and is used as a load-bearing illustration in the conclusions.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 8, 'Jets born from singular collapse', discussion of geometry-selected inertial similarity; repeated in Section 11.]
    "Within that window, the cone closes through a geometry-selected inertial similarity [43]. Writing τ for the time remaining until jet inception gives r_jet ∼ τ^{α(β)} and v_jet ∼ τ^{α(β)−1}, with β selecting α≃0.63 near Oh = 0.03."

    The quantitative claim α≃0.63 is presented as a prediction of a 'geometry-selected inertial similarity' and is then used in Section 11 as the 'more striking example' that a log-log slope can conceal the wrong force balance because We→∞ for α>2/3. Reference [43] is an arXiv preprint co-authored by the present author (Gordillo, Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Sanjay), and the review provides no derivation, no independent benchmark, and no external data for this exponent. Thus this specific load-bearing illustration reduces to an unverified self-citation rather than to an independently established result, while the rest of the review's diagnostic framework remains supported by independent literature.

full rationale

The paper is a review organized around a diagnostic framework—identify the shrinking length, the dominant balance, self-similarity, universality, and regularisation—rather than a new derivation whose output is fixed by its own inputs. The core scaling laws for drop pinch-off (τ^{2/3} and τ), bubble pinch-off (τ^{1/2} with logarithmic corrections), coalescence (0.272 θ^4 t, attributed to Hernández-Sánchez et al.), and the Cox-Voinov contact-line relation are all cited from independent groups or standard literature. The author's own code repositories and simulations are used for illustrative figures, but the quantitative laws in those figures are tied to independent citations, e.g., the coalescence coefficient comes from reference [20] and not from the author's own code. The paper also explicitly acknowledges the main caveat to its scale-separation premise—polymer Deborah number reaching order unity, Marangoni stresses, thermal fluctuations, and other physics entering before a nominal cutoff—so the framework is not immunized against its own assumptions. The only step that raises the circularity score is the α≃0.63 Worthington-jet exponent, which is both attributed to a same-author preprint and deployed in the conclusions as a striking illustration that an exponent close to 2/3 can nonetheless imply a different force balance. Because that argument depends on the specific unverified value α≈0.63, the review contains one load-bearing self-citation, but the central synthesis is not forced by definition or by a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new fitted parameters or invented entities. Its quantitative content is imported from cited works, including some of the author's own; the main underwriting assumptions are the continuum balances and the scale-separation or matched-asymptotics structure that let singular regions be characterized locally.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Incompressible Newtonian fluids with constant surface tension follow the Navier-Stokes equations with no-slip boundary conditions, up to the scale where regularisation sets in.
    Used throughout sections 3 to 6; this is the standard continuum model of the examples, not derived in the review.
  • domain assumption The relevant local balances can be reduced to power laws, such as inertia-capillarity ρ(hdot)^2 ~ γ/h and viscosity-capillarity μ hdot/h ~ γ/h.
    Equations (2) and (3) in section 2; the review uses these balances to interpret the measured exponents.
  • domain assumption Matched asymptotics: an outer problem supplies forcing, and an inner problem with a shrinking scale can be matched to it through logarithmic or power-law bridging.
    Section 2, second tool; this is the load-bearing scale-separation premise described in weakest_assumption.
  • domain assumption Moving contact lines are regularized by a microscopic cutoff such as a slip length, and the macroscopic angle depends on it only logarithmically through the Cox-Voinov relation.
    Section 6, equations (6) to (9); this cites Huh-Scriven and Cox-Voinov rather than proving them.
  • domain assumption For each dynamic example, the time-to-singularity t0 is finite and a self-similar solution exists over an intermediate window.
    Section 2, equation (1); the review assumes finite-time blow-up for the characteristic examples, while noting that diffusion-like cases are different.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Singularities in Soft Matter Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3PQYL7MD

@misc{pith2026260811060,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Singularities in Soft Matter Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3PQYL7MD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11060}
}
read the original abstract

When a liquid thread pinches off, its neck thins as it separates into two unconnected regions. Using continuum mechanics, we can predict that the neck reaches zero radius in finite time while its curvature grows without bound. Together, the vanishing neck and diverging curvature form a finite-time singularity. However, a real fluid does not realise these mathematical limits as molecular or material physics takes over once the neck becomes sufficiently small. Similar singularities arise throughout soft matter whenever a smooth continuum description is used at vanishing length scales. This review asks what the shrinking region forgets, what it retains, and which material length, time, or stress cuts off the apparent divergence. The dynamics near a singularity often become self-similar, with profiles at different times collapsing onto one shape when rescaled by the shrinking local length. Sometimes that collapse is universal enough that the surrounding geometry and forcing no longer determine the local dynamics. Nonetheless, the measured output could still depend on how the shrinking region is fed by the surrounding flow and on the small-scale physics that finally replaces the ideal divergence. Complex fluids and active matter change the same local balance by bringing their own timescales into the shrinking region. Beyond interfaces, the same logic applies when the localised object is a stress concentration or a defect in geometry or order rather than a moving surface. Singularities matter because they show where continuum theory stops being the relevant description and how the small-scale cutoff sets the outputs that count in printing, coating, aerosols, and stretchable solids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11060 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A visual dictionary for singularities in soft matter. The four panels are schematics of different singular events: (a) Drop pinch-off. An outer flow stretches a liquid thread whose neck radius hmin is driven towards zero, drawn with faint self-similar profiles around the neck and a cutoff at the core. (b) A moving contact line. A drop advances at speed U over a solid, and the apparent contact angle θap is set by mat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The conceptual toolkit, drawn as a reference card for the sections that follow. A candidate singu￾larity is read along a route in physical time t (horizontal axis), from the outer scale R at t = 0 towards the cutoff ℓm as the time-to-singularity τ ≡ t0 − t → 0. The thinning-neck sequence above is a worked example of drop pinch-off, with hmin ∼ Aτ α; the four lanes below are general diagnostic questions, while the si… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Drop pinch-off, from experiment to thinning law. (a) A water drop pinching off from a nozzle, with the neck region (red box) enlarged in the subsequent frames; scale bars 500 µm (black) and 250 µm (white), and the labels give (t0 − t) in ms. The selected frames have been reprinted with permission from C. I. Verschuur, A. T. Oratis, V. Sanjay, and J. H. Snoeijer, “How elasticity affects bubble pinch-off,” Physical Re… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Coalescence of two viscous sessile (substrate-supported) drops. (a) The drops first meet in a wedge set by the contact angle θ, with microscopic physics initiating the liquid bridge. (b) Clean-interface lubrication simulations for θ = 10◦ show the bridge filling the we…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A moving contact line as a spatial singularity. (a) The no-slip wedge localises stress near the moving line. (b,c) Numerical integration of the no-slip contact-line model [26] over 10−3 < X < 105 , where X is the distance from the contact line (made dimensionless) and …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Experimental views of interfacial localisation and output selection. (a) A viscous roller flow pulls a free surface into a cusp. (b) A plunging viscous jet opens the cusp into an entrained gas sheet. (c) Six high-speed frames show a 0.55 mm FC-84 drop striking a 340◦C …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic of the singularity viewpoint developed in the review. Examples of hydrodynamic sin￾gularities — pinch-off, coalescence, contact lines, films, and jets — feed a local region where length and time scales, driving, material memory, and cutoff must be identified.…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Singularities: Formation, structure, and propagation

    Eggers J, Fontelos MA. Singularities: Formation, structure, and propagation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Nonlinear dynamics and breakup of free-surface flows

    Eggers J. Nonlinear dynamics and breakup of free-surface flows. Rev Mod Phys. 1997 jul; 69(3):865–929. Available from:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.69. 865

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.69 1997

  3. [3]

    Physics of liquid jets

    Eggers J, Villermaux E. Physics of liquid jets. Rep Prog Phys. 2008 feb;71(3):036601. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/71/3/036601

    doi:10.1088/0034-4885/71/3/036601 2008

  4. [4]

    Universal pinching of 3D axisymmetric free-surface flow

    Eggers J. Universal pinching of 3D axisymmetric free-surface flow. Phys Rev Lett. 1993 nov;71(21):3458–3460. Available from:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.71.3458

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Persistence of memory in drop breakup: The 19 breakdown of universality

    Doshi P, Cohen I, Zhang WW, et al. Persistence of memory in drop breakup: The 19 breakdown of universality. Science. 2003 nov;302(5648):1185–1188. Available from:https: //www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1089272

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1089272 2003

  6. [6]

    Code repository: Elastic pinch-off [https://github.com/ comphy-lab/ElasticPinchOff]; 2025

    Sanjay V, collaborators. Code repository: Elastic pinch-off [https://github.com/ comphy-lab/ElasticPinchOff]; 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Statique expérimentale et théorique des liquides soumis aux seules forces moléculaires

    Plateau JAF. Statique expérimentale et théorique des liquides soumis aux seules forces moléculaires. Paris: Gauthier-Villars; 1873

    work page

  8. [8]

    On the instability of jets

    Lord Rayleigh. On the instability of jets. Proc London Math Soc. 1878;s1-10(1):4–13. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s1-10.1.4

    doi:10.1112/plms/s1-10.1.4

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Wolfgang von Ohnesorge

    McKinley GH, Renardy M. Wolfgang von Ohnesorge. Phys Fluids. 2011 Dec; 23(12):127101. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3663616

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    Viscous free-surface flows [dissertation]

    Sanjay V. Viscous free-surface flows [dissertation]. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente; 2022. Available from:https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036554077

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Self-similar capillary pinchoff of an inviscid fluid

    Day RF, Hinch EJ, Lister JR. Self-similar capillary pinchoff of an inviscid fluid. Phys Rev Lett. 1998 jan;80(4):704–707. Available from:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.80.704

    1998

  4. [12]

    Plethora of transitions during breakup of liquid filaments

    Castrejón-Pita JR, Castrejón-Pita AA, Thete SS, et al. Plethora of transitions during breakup of liquid filaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015 apr;112(15):4582–4587. Avail- able from:https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1418541112

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    Two fluid drop snap-off problem: Experiments and theory

    Cohen I, Brenner MP, Eggers J, et al. Two fluid drop snap-off problem: Experiments and theory. Phys Rev Lett. 1999 Aug;83(6):1147–1150. Available from:https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.83.1147

    1999

  6. [14]

    Inhibition of the finite-time singularity during droplet fission of a polymeric fluid

    Amarouchene Y, Bonn D, Meunier J, et al. Inhibition of the finite-time singularity during droplet fission of a polymeric fluid. Phys Rev Lett. 2001 apr;86(16):3558–3561. Available from:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3558

    2001 doi

  7. [15]

    J Fluid Mech

    EggersJ,HerradaMA,SnoeijerJH.Self-similarbreakupofpolymericthreadsasdescribed by the oldroyd-b model. J Fluid Mech. 2020;887:A19. Available from:https://doi.org/ 10.1017/jfm.2020.12

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    Axisymmetric bubble pinch-off at high Reynolds numbers

    Gordillo JM, Sevilla A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez J, et al. Axisymmetric bubble pinch-off at high Reynolds numbers. Phys Rev Lett. 2005 nov;95(19):194501. Available from:https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.194501

    2005 doi

  9. [17]

    Approach to universality in axisymmetric bubble pinch-off

    Gekle S, Snoeijer JH, Lohse D, et al. Approach to universality in axisymmetric bubble pinch-off. Phys Rev E. 2009 sep;80(3):036305. Available from:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.036305

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    How elasticity affects bubble pinch-off

    Verschuur CI, Oratis AT, Sanjay V, et al. How elasticity affects bubble pinch-off. Phys Rev Fluids. 2026 Jul;11(7):073302. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/5sp3-k5l2

    2026 doi

  11. [19]

    Code repository: Coalescence with surfactants [https: //github.com/comphy-lab/coalescence-with-surfactants]; 2025

    Talukdar J, Rocha D, Sanjay V. Code repository: Coalescence with surfactants [https: //github.com/comphy-lab/coalescence-with-surfactants]; 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Symmetric and asymmetric coales- cence of drops on a substrate

    Hernández-Sánchez JF, Lubbers LA, Eddi A, et al. Symmetric and asymmetric coales- cence of drops on a substrate. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109(18):184502

    2012

  13. [21]

    Coalescence of liquid drops

    Eggers J, Lister JR, Stone HA. Coalescence of liquid drops. J Fluid Mech. 1999 dec; 401:293–310. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211209900662X

    1999 doi

  14. [22]

    Coalescence dynamics

    Eggers J, Sprittles JE, Snoeijer JH. Coalescence dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2025 jan;57(1):61–87. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-fluid-121021-044919

    2025

  15. [23]

    Hydrodynamics of droplet coalescence

    Aarts DGAL, Lekkerkerker HNW, Guo H, et al. Hydrodynamics of droplet coalescence. Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Oct;95(16):164503. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.95.164503

    2005

  16. [24]

    The inexorable resistance of inertia determines the initial regime of drop coalescence

    Paulsen JD, Burton JC, Nagel SR, et al. The inexorable resistance of inertia determines the initial regime of drop coalescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012 Apr;109(18):6857–

    2012

  17. [25]

    When elasticity affects drop coalescence

    Dekker PJ, Hack MA, Tewes W, et al. When elasticity affects drop coalescence. Phys Rev Lett. 2022 Jan;128(2):028004. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 128.028004

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Code repository: Contact-Line-101 [https://github.com/ 20 comphy-lab/Contact-Line-101]; 2026

    Bhargava A, Sanjay V. Code repository: Contact-Line-101 [https://github.com/ 20 comphy-lab/Contact-Line-101]; 2026

    2026

  19. [27]

    Wetting and spreading

    Bonn D, Eggers J, Indekeu J, et al. Wetting and spreading. Rev Mod Phys. 2009 may; 81(2):739–805. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.739

    2009 doi

  20. [28]

    Moving contact lines: Scales, regimes, and dynamical tran- sitions

    Snoeijer JH, Andreotti B. Moving contact lines: Scales, regimes, and dynamical tran- sitions. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2013;45:269–292. Available from:https://doi.org/10. 1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140734

    2013

  21. [29]

    Coexistence of two singularities in dewetting flows: Regularizing the corner tip

    Peters IR, Snoeijer JH, Daerr A, et al. Coexistence of two singularities in dewetting flows: Regularizing the corner tip. Phys Rev Lett. 2009 sep;103(11):114501. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.114501

    2009 doi

  22. [30]

    Free-surface cusps associated with flow at low reynolds num- ber

    Jeong JT, Moffatt HK. Free-surface cusps associated with flow at low reynolds num- ber. J Fluid Mech. 1992 Aug;241:1–22. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0022112092001927

    1992

  23. [31]

    Bending and growth of entrained air filament under con- verging and asymmetric rotational fields

    Kumar P, Das AK, Mitra SK. Bending and growth of entrained air filament under con- verging and asymmetric rotational fields. Phys Fluids. 2017;29(2):022101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975211

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    Sink flow deforms the interface between a viscous liquid and air into a tip singularity

    Courrech du Pont S, Eggers J. Sink flow deforms the interface between a viscous liquid and air into a tip singularity. Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Jan;96(3):034501. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.034501

    2006 doi

  25. [33]

    Fluid interfaces with very sharp tips in viscous flow

    Courrech du Pont S, Eggers J. Fluid interfaces with very sharp tips in viscous flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020 Dec;117(51):32238–32243. Available from:https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.2019287117

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    Air entrainment through free-surface cusps

    Eggers J. Air entrainment through free-surface cusps. Phys Rev Lett. 2001 May; 86(19):4290–4293. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4290

    2001 doi

  27. [35]

    Air entrainment by a viscous jet plunging into a bath

    Lorenceau É, Quéré D, Eggers J. Air entrainment by a viscous jet plunging into a bath. Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Dec;93(25):254501. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.93.254501

    2004

  28. [36]

    Long-scale evolution of thin liquid films

    Oron A, Davis SH, Bankoff SG. Long-scale evolution of thin liquid films. Rev Mod Phys. 1997 Jul;69(3):931–980. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys. 69.931

    1997 doi

  29. [37]

    Thermal rupture of a free liquid sheet

    Kitavtsev G, Fontelos MA, Eggers J. Thermal rupture of a free liquid sheet. J Fluid Mech. 2018 Apr;840:555–578. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.74

    2018 doi

  30. [38]

    Breakup of thin liquid films: From stochastic to deter- ministic

    Chatzigiannakis E, Vermant J. Breakup of thin liquid films: From stochastic to deter- ministic. Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Oct;125(15):158001. Available from:https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.158001

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    Singularity dynamics in curvature collapse and jet eruption on a fluid surface

    Zeff BW, Kleber B, Fineberg J, et al. Singularity dynamics in curvature collapse and jet eruption on a fluid surface. Nature. 2000 Jan;403:401–404. Available from:https: //doi.org/10.1038/35000151

    doi

  32. [40]

    Capillary waves control the ejection of bubble burst- ing jets

    Gordillo JM, Rodríguez-Rodríguez J. Capillary waves control the ejection of bubble burst- ing jets. J Fluid Mech. 2019 May;867:556–571. Available from:https://doi.org/10. 1017/jfm.2019.161

    2019

  33. [41]

    Revision of bubble bursting: Universal scaling laws of top jet drop size and speed

    Ganan-Calvo AM. Revision of bubble bursting: Universal scaling laws of top jet drop size and speed. Phys Rev Lett. 2017 Nov;119(20):204502. Available from:https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.204502

    2017 doi

  34. [42]

    Bubble bursting: Universal cavity and jet profiles

    Lai CY, Eggers J, Deike L. Bubble bursting: Universal cavity and jet profiles. Phys Rev Lett. 2018 Oct;121(14):144501. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.144501

    2018

  35. [43]

    Self-similar Worthington jets ; 2026

    Gordillo JM, Rodríguez-Rodríguez J, Sanjay V. Self-similar Worthington jets ; 2026. Available from:https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08972

    2026 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Viscoelastic Worthington jets and droplets produced by bursting bubbles

    Dixit A, Oratis A, Zinelis K, et al. Viscoelastic Worthington jets and droplets produced by bursting bubbles. J Fluid Mech. 2025 May;1010:A2. Available from:https://doi. org/10.1017/jfm.2025.237

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    Drop impact dynamics: Impact force and stress distribu- tions

    Cheng X, Sun TP, Gordillo L. Drop impact dynamics: Impact force and stress distribu- tions. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2022 Jan;54(1):57–81. Available from:https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-fluid-030321-103941. 21

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    Impact forces of water drops falling on superhydrophobic surfaces

    Zhang B, Sanjay V, Shi S, et al. Impact forces of water drops falling on superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. 2022 Aug;129(10):104501. Available from:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.104501

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    The role of viscosity on drop impact forces on non-wetting surfaces

    Sanjay V, Zhang B, Lv C, et al. The role of viscosity on drop impact forces on non-wetting surfaces. J Fluid Mech. 2025 Jan;1004:A6. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1017/ jfm.2024.982

    2025

  40. [48]

    Fundamental fluid dynamics challenges in inkjet printing

    Lohse D. Fundamental fluid dynamics challenges in inkjet printing. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2022 Jan;54(1):349–382. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-fluid-022321-114001

    2022

  41. [49]

    The Deborah number

    Reiner M. The Deborah number. Phys Today. 1964 Jan;17(1):62. Available from:https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.3051374

    1964 doi

  42. [50]

    The Deborah and Weissenberg numbers

    Poole RJ. The Deborah and Weissenberg numbers. Rheol Bull. 2012;53(2):32–39. Avail- able from:https://pcwww.liv.ac.uk/~robpoole/PAPERS/POOLE_45.pdf

    2012

  43. [51]

    Self-similarity in the breakup of very dilute viscoelastic solutions

    Deblais A, Herrada MA, Eggers J, et al. Self-similarity in the breakup of very dilute viscoelastic solutions. J Fluid Mech. 2020 Oct;904:R2. Available from:https://doi.org/ 10.1017/jfm.2020.765

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    Repeated formation of fluid threads in breakup of a surfactant-covered jet

    McGough PT, Basaran OA. Repeated formation of fluid threads in breakup of a surfactant-covered jet. Phys Rev Lett. 2006 feb;96(5):054502. Available from:https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.054502

    2006 doi

  45. [53]

    Role of Marangoni stress during breakup of surfactant-covered liquid threads: Reduced rates of thinning and microthread cas- cades

    Kamat PM, Wagoner BW, Thete SS, et al. Role of Marangoni stress during breakup of surfactant-covered liquid threads: Reduced rates of thinning and microthread cas- cades. Phys Rev Fluids. 2018 apr;3(4):043602. Available from:https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevFluids.3.043602

    2018

  46. [54]

    Non-spherical bubbles

    Subramaniam AB, Abkarian M, Mahadevan L, et al. Non-spherical bubbles. Nature. 2005 dec;438(7070):930. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1038/438930a

    2005 doi

  47. [55]

    Elasticity of an interfacial particle raft

    Vella D, Aussillous P, Mahadevan L. Elasticity of an interfacial particle raft. Eu- rophys Lett. 2004 oct;68(2):212–218. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/ i2004-10202-x

    2004 doi

  48. [56]

    Rogue nanowaves: A route to film rupture

    Sprittles JE, Liu J, Lockerby DA, et al. Rogue nanowaves: A route to film rupture. Phys Rev Fluids. 2023 Sep;8(9):L092001. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevFluids.8.L092001

    2023

  49. [57]

    Droplet coalescence is initiated by ther- mal motion

    Perumanath S, Borg MK, Chubynsky MV, et al. Droplet coalescence is initiated by ther- mal motion. Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Mar;122(10):104501. Available from:https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.104501

    2019 doi

  50. [58]

    Defect annihilation and proliferation in active nematics

    Giomi L, Bowick MJ, Ma X, et al. Defect annihilation and proliferation in active nematics. Phys Rev Lett. 2013 May;110(22):228101. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.110.228101

    2013

  51. [59]

    Topological active matter

    Shankar S, Souslov A, Bowick MJ, et al. Topological active matter. Nature Rev Phys. 2022 May;4(6):380–398. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00445-3

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    Stress focusing in elastic sheets

    Witten TA. Stress focusing in elastic sheets. Rev Mod Phys. 2007 Apr;79(2):643–675. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.79.643

    2007 doi

  53. [61]

    Conical surfaces and crescent singularities in crumpled sheets

    Cerda E, Mahadevan L. Conical surfaces and crescent singularities in crumpled sheets. Phys Rev Lett. 1998 Mar;80(11):2358–2361. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.80.2358

    1998

  54. [62]

    Unfolding the sulcus

    Hohlfeld E, Mahadevan L. Unfolding the sulcus. Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Mar;106(10):105702. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.105702

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    The fracture of highly deformable soft materials: A tale of two length scales

    Long R, Hui CY, Gong JP, et al. The fracture of highly deformable soft materials: A tale of two length scales. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys. 2021 Mar;12(1):71–94. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-042020-023937

    2021 doi

  56. [64]

    The topological theory of defects in ordered media

    Mermin ND. The topological theory of defects in ordered media. Rev Mod Phys. 1979 Jul;51(3):591–648. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.51.591

    1979 doi

  57. [65]

    The geometry of soft materials: a primer

    Kamien RD. The geometry of soft materials: a primer. Rev Mod Phys. 2002 Oct; 74(4):953–971. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.953. 22

    2002 doi

  58. [6861]

    Available from:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120775109

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.