Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Exact Defect Correlation Functions in Chern-Simons Matter Theories

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two collinear mesonic line operators in Chern-Simons matter have four-point functions fixed exactly at order 1/N by higher-spin Ward identities.

desk verdict Strong bootstrap computation of defect four-point functions in CS matter, but the headline 'arbitrary coupling' claim holds only on the ν=0 slice. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11313 v1 pith:WGWZBUM4 submitted 2026-08-11 hep-th

Gwenaël Ferrando , Elior Urisman This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords Chern-Simonsmatterconformallinedefectsdefect-changingoperatorsslightlybrokenhigher-spinsymmetrydefectcorrelationfunctionslarge-Nbootstrapstar-trianglerelationmesonic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to compute, at the first non-trivial order in the large-N expansion, the connected correlation functions of two collinear mesonic line operators—four defect-changing operators in total—in the quasi-fermionic Chern-Simons matter theory, for any value of the coupling parameter Δ. The claimed output is explicit closed-form answers for three representative spin configurations: equation (1.3) for the equal-equal case, (4.27) for the unequal-equal case, and (4.39) for the unequal-unequal connected correlator, together with an infinite family of further examples in the appendices. These are non-perturbative four-point functions of extended operators in a strongly coupled gauge theory, a regime where few exact results exist. As a by-product the paper extracts order-1/N corrections to the relative conformal dimensions of defect-changing and factorized line operators, and proves a generalization of the star-triangle integral relation that may be useful independently.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pseudo-charge $Q^{{(3)}}$_{33}, defined as the regulated integral of the divergence of the almost-conserved spin-3 current J_3 over a cylinder surrounding the line defect. Acting on a mesonic line it produces a differential operator on the endpoint positions; the identity (4.2) converts the non-conservation of J_3 into a linear second-order PDE for the four-point function whose source is a convolution of known two-point and three-point correlators. The integration constants are fixed by the OPE in the channel where the two lines touch. The evaluation of the resulting cross-ratio integrals relies on a new generalization of the star-triangle relation, equation (1.7), and on differential equations of Yangian type for the one-loop master integrals.

What would settle it

Compute the action of the pseudo-charge on an infinite straight Wilson line to the next order in 1/N: if the line-deformation operator $D^{{(2)}}$_{33} is non-zero at order 1/$N^{2}$, the source in (4.2) is incomplete and the claimed formulas fail. A direct two-loop evaluation of any of the three correlators in (1.2) in the quasi-fermionic Chern-Simons theory would also settle the claim, since the paper reports one-loop checks only.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that pseudo Ward–Takahashi identities from the almost-conserved spin-3 current completely determine the connected part of a two-mesonic-line four-point function at order 1/N, up to a small number of integration constants fixed by the OPE. Conformal symmetry alone reduces each such correlator to one function of a single cross-ratio; the bootstrap supplies a second-order differential equation for that function, with a source built from already-known bulk-defect three-point functions. Solving this equation, together with the boundary conditions, yields the explicit formulas advertised in (1.3), (4.27), and (4.39). The same machinery also gives the relative conformal dimension of factorized operators like :O_s O_{-s}: at order 1/N, formula (4.51), and a generalized star-triangle relation (1.7) used to evaluate the master integrals.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the almost-conserved spin-3 charge, acting on the straight defect, moves only the endpoints at the order computed and does not deform the line itself, and that endpoint corrections involving only the two lightest currents are the only ones that matter; if an extra correction entered at order 1/N, the source term in the Ward identity would change and every displayed four-point function would acquire additional contributions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, (1.3) provides an explicit non-perturbative four-point function of defect-changing operators in Chern-Simons matter at arbitrary coupling.
  • The same bootstrap yields an infinite family of such correlators, with the three worked examples serving as representatives of the distinct spin-sign classes.
  • Formula (4.51) gives order-1/N corrections to the conformal dimensions of factorized line operators, data not previously available.
  • The generalized star-triangle relation (1.7) and the master-integral evaluations are standalone results that can be used in other three-dimensional loop computations.
  • The one-loop checks in Appendix D confirm the bootstrap formulas against explicit Feynman diagrams in the fermionic Chern-Simons theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same pseudo-charge construction should carry over to the quasi-bosonic theory, where the scalar has dimension 1+O(1/N); the paper's Δ→2−Δ symmetry of the spectrum suggests the correlators map by replacing Δ with 2−Δ.
  • Editorial inference: matching the bootstrap formulas to a conformal-block expansion could extract defect OPE coefficients of all exchanged line operators, not just the dimension shifts reported.
  • Editorial inference: the generalized star-triangle relation (1.7) might apply beyond defect correlators, for instance to massive deformations or to fishnet-type integrals in three dimensions, where hypergeometric propagators arise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a bootstrap approach to defect correlation functions in large-N three-dimensional CFTs with slightly broken higher-spin symmetry, focusing on the quasi-fermionic Chern-Simons matter theory. The authors solve pseudo Ward-Takahashi identities for the non-conservation of the spin-three current J_3 and thereby compute connected four-point functions of two collinear mesonic line operators, i.e. correlators of four defect-changing operators, at first non-trivial order in 1/N. Three explicit examples are presented: the equal-equal case in Eq. (1.3), the unequal-equal case in Eq. (4.27), and the unequal-unequal connected correlator in Eq. (4.39), each expressed through explicit cross-ratio integrals and, in the first case, through hypergeometric functions. The paper also derives defect OPE coefficients, O(1/N) relative dimensions of boundary operators, an extension of the star-triangle integral relation, and detailed one-loop checks in the fermionic Chern-Simons theory. The derivation is careful and the assumptions are stated, but the main computations are restricted to the slice a_2 = 0, equivalently ν = 0, which is not justified as the physical value for the standard Wilson line.

Significance. If the claimed results hold for the physical Chern-Simons matter theory, they constitute a substantial advance: explicit non-perturbative defect four-point functions at O(1/N) in a strongly coupled three-dimensional gauge theory are rare, and the connection to defect OPE data and the extended star-triangle relation are independently useful. The paper is technically detailed, with assumptions laid out, three independent bootstrapped correlators, and one-loop cross-checks. The strengths include the explicit hypergeometric evaluation of the first correlator, the derivation of the generalized integral identity (C.3), and the transparent treatment of integration constants through OPE limits. However, the advertised generality is not established because all central results are obtained on the ν = 0 slice of parameter space.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 opening paragraph; Eq. (4.7); Eq. (A.35); abstract] The paper's central claim of results 'at arbitrary values of the coupling constant' for Chern-Simons matter theories is not supported by the computations as presented. Section 4 states 'For the rest of this section, for simplicity, we set a_2 = 0', and since Eq. (A.35) gives a_2 ∝ ν, all three main correlators (1.3), (4.27), and (4.39) are derived on the ν = 0 slice of the three-parameter space (N, Δ, ν) defined in Section 2.2. The same restriction enters the O(1/N) dimension differences in Section 3 through Eqs. (3.10) and (3.11), and the unequal-unequal generalization in Appendix E.3 uses coefficients fixed only at ν = 0 in Appendix B.4. No argument is given that the fundamental Wilson line of the quasi-fermionic Chern-Simons matter theory has ν = 0. If ν ≠ 0, the term 2i a_2/N (J_+^1 J_-^2 - J_-^1 J_+^2) in Eq. (4.7) contributes to the source of the Ward identity (4.2) at O(1/N), and the double-trace coefficients (B.9) and (B.15) acquire ν-dependent corrections, so the presented correlators would not be the physical ones. The authors should either extend the computation to general ν or prove that the physical Wilson line has ν = 0 and revise the abstract and introduction accordingly.
  2. [§1.1, last paragraph; §2.2] The claimed application to SU(N_c) Chern-Simons theories with fermionic matter requires a precise mapping of the bootstrap parameter ν to the field theory. The introduction states that one must identify the mapping between (Δ, N) and (λ, N_c), but ν is omitted from this mapping. Since ν is one of the three independent parameters of the bootstrap setup and appears in the physical definition (2.14), the paper should either compute ν for the standard Wilson line or explicitly state that the results apply only to the ν = 0 subsector of the theory space. Without this, the title and abstract overstate the applicability of the results.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix C.1, Eq. (C.13)] In the d-dimensional generalization of the star-triangle relation, the right-hand side should have exponents d - 2γ, d - 2β, and d + 2(S - α), not 3 - 2γ, 3 - 2β, and 3 + 2(S - α). As printed, the formula is inconsistent with the d = 3 case (C.3) when d ≠ 3.
  2. [Appendix D, Eqs. (D.12), (D.24), (D.33)] The one-loop checks rely on conjectured analytical evaluations of double integrals that are verified only numerically. This should be stated explicitly in the main text, since a reader may otherwise take the perturbative checks as fully analytic confirmation. Ideally the authors would provide proofs or a more detailed numerical appendix.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, for example 'one lopp' in Appendix D.2 and 'The function Falso contains' in Section 4.3, which should read 'The function Fuu also contains'. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  4. [Figures 3-5] The captions and text could more clearly specify the numerical integration methods used for the dots in Figure 3 and for the interpolated Fuu in Figure 5, as well as the precision attained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Ward-identity solution with OPE-fixed constants and independent one-loop checks.

full rationale

I find no circular reduction. The central four-point functions are obtained by solving the pseudo-Ward identity (4.2), whose source is constructed from the explicitly bootstrapped three-point functions and the divergence (4.7). The resulting differential equations, e.g. (4.9), are solved for the correlator; the integration constants are fixed by matching the OPE limits (4.16), (4.21)-(4.22), and (4.40)-(4.41), not by adjusting the final answer to reproduce itself. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: Delta, N, and nu are inputs, while the correlators are outputs expressed as explicit integrals/hypergeometric functions. Self-citations to [31]-[33],[42] supply input correlators and the boundary spectrum; these are prior three-point/spectrum results, not the four-point functions being derived, and Appendix D provides independent one-loop Feynman-diagram checks of all three main correlators, so the self-citations are not circularly load-bearing. The main scope caveat is that Section 4 sets 'For the rest of this section, for simplicity, we set a2 = 0' and Appendix B.4 states 'The computations of this subsection are done for nu = a2 = 0', so the explicit results are established on the nu = 0 slice even though the abstract claims arbitrary values of the coupling constant; this is a limitation on the domain of the claim, not a reduction of the derivation to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted in this paper. The central results depend on input parameters of the bootstrap (N, Delta, ν), of which Delta is listed as a free parameter for transparency because it is a continuous input; it is not adjusted to data. The main computations set ν=0, restricting results to a parity-even subsector. All other quantities are fixed by Ward identities or OPE consistency, not by fitting.

free parameters (1)
  • Delta (conformal dimension of O_{±1/2})
    Input parameter of the bootstrap, running over [1/2, 3/2]. Not fitted in this paper; in the perturbative CS fermion theory it maps to the 't Hooft coupling as Delta = 1 + λ/2 + O(λ^3).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Existence of a slightly broken higher-spin symmetry in large-N CS matter theories: J1 and J2 are conserved, and higher-spin currents are conserved up to O(1/N).
    Section 2.1, based on [11]. This is the framework that justifies the pseudo Ward-Takahashi identities.
  • domain assumption Boundary operator spectrum (2.2) with a single parameter Delta characterizing the dimensions and transverse spins of fundamental and anti-fundamental operators.
    Section 2.1, from [42]. The whole computation relies on this spectrum.
  • domain assumption The divergence of J3 has the form (4.7) with coefficients a1 and a2 from [31], and a2 is proportional to ν.
    Section 4, after (4.6), used to write the source term in the Ward identities.
  • ad hoc to paper The pseudo-charge Q^{(3)}_{33} acts on the line defect at most at O(1/N^2), i.e., the tilt operator D^{(2)}_{33} is absent at the order computed.
    Appendix B.5 argues this using cancellation of certain one-point functions; if false, the RHS of (4.2) would receive extra line-insertion contributions.
  • ad hoc to paper Setting a2=0 (ν=0) in the main computations of Section 4.
    Stated at the end of Section 4: 'For the rest of this section, for simplicity, we set a2=0.' The ν≠0 corrections are not computed, so the presented results are restricted to ν=0.
  • standard math The homogeneous solutions of the Ward identities are uniquely fixed by requiring the correct OPE limits as x3→x2 and x3→x0.
    Sections 4.1-4.3 use OPE consistency to fix integration constants such as Fee(0).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exact Defect Correlation Functions in Chern-Simons Matter Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WGWZBUM4

@misc{pith2026260811313,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exact Defect Correlation Functions in Chern-Simons Matter Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WGWZBUM4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11313}
}
abstract

We study defect correlators in three-dimensional, large-$N$, conformal field theories with slightly broken higher-spin symmetry. Focusing on the quasi-fermionic theory, we bootstrap correlation functions of four defect-changing operators, i.e. of two collinear conformal line defects with boundaries, at arbitrary values of the coupling constant. We can compute an infinite number of such correlators and present a detailed analysis for three typical cases. In addition, we obtain some defect OPE coefficients that give us access to the relative conformal dimension between defect-changing operators at order $O(1/N)$. In the course of our analysis, we also derive explicit expressions for some Feynman integrals that might be of independent interest, including an extension of the usual star-triangle relation. Our bootstrap assumptions naturally apply to Chern-Simons matter theories, so our results provide a non-trivial example of explicit, non-perturbative defect four-point functions in a strongly coupled gauge theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ribault,Exactly solvable conformal field theories,2411.17262

    S. Ribault,Exactly solvable conformal field theories,2411.17262

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Teschner,On the Liouville three point function,Phys

    J. Teschner,On the Liouville three point function,Phys. Lett. B363(1995) 65 [hep-th/9507109]

    arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    Trevisani,The Parisi-Sourlas uplift and infinitely many solvable 4d CFTs,SciPost Phys

    E. Trevisani,The Parisi-Sourlas uplift and infinitely many solvable 4d CFTs,SciPost Phys. 18(2025) 056 [2405.00771]

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Grabner, N

    D. Grabner, N. Gromov, V. Kazakov and G. Korchemsky,Stronglyγ-DeformedN= 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory as an Integrable Conformal Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 111601 [1711.04786]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov and G. Korchemsky,Exact Correlation Functions in Conformal Fishnet Theory,JHEP08(2019) 123 [1808.02688]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Coronado,Bootstrapping the Simplest Correlator in PlanarN= 4Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory to All Loops,Phys

    F. Coronado,Bootstrapping the Simplest Correlator in PlanarN= 4Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory to All Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 171601 [1811.03282]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Kostov, V

    I. Kostov, V. B. Petkova and D. Serban,Determinant Formula for the Octagon Form Factor inN=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 231601 [1903.05038]. – 51 –

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    A. V. Belitsky and G. P. Korchemsky,Exact null octagon,JHEP05(2020) 070 [1907.13131]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Aharony, G

    O. Aharony, G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby,d=3 Bosonic Vector Models Coupled to Chern-Simons Gauge Theories,JHEP03(2012) 037 [1110.4382]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Giombi, S

    S. Giombi, S. Minwalla, S. Prakash, S. P. Trivedi, S. R. Wadia and X. Yin,Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 2112 [1110.4386]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Maldacena and A

    J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov,Constraining conformal field theories with a slightly broken higher spin symmetry,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 104003 [1204.3882]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Giombi, V

    S. Giombi, V. Gurucharan, V. Kirilin, S. Prakash and E. Skvortsov,On the Higher-Spin Spectrum in Large N Chern-Simons Vector Models,JHEP01(2017) 058 [1610.08472]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    G. J. Turiaci and A. Zhiboedov,Veneziano Amplitude of Vasiliev Theory,JHEP10(2018) 034 [1802.04390]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Caron-Huot,Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,JHEP09(2017) 078 [1703.00278]

    S. Caron-Huot,Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,JHEP09(2017) 078 [1703.00278]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Aharony, L

    O. Aharony, L. F. Alday, A. Bissi and R. Yacoby,The Analytic Bootstrap for LargeN Chern-Simons Vector Models,JHEP08(2018) 166 [1805.04377]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Li,Bootstrapping conformal four-point correlators with slightly broken higher spin symmetry and3Dbosonization,JHEP10(2020) 007 [1906.05834]

    Z. Li,Bootstrapping conformal four-point correlators with slightly broken higher spin symmetry and3Dbosonization,JHEP10(2020) 007 [1906.05834]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    J. A. Silva,Four point functions in CFT’s with slightly broken higher spin symmetry,JHEP 05(2021) 097 [2103.00275]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bedhotiya and S

    A. Bedhotiya and S. Prakash,A test of bosonization at the level of four-point functions in Chern-Simons vector models,JHEP12(2015) 032 [1506.05412]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [19]

    R. R. Kalloor,Four-point functions in largeNChern-Simons fermionic theories,JHEP10 (2020) 028 [1910.14617]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kukolj,Four-point functions and contact terms from higher-spin Ward identities of Chern-Simons-matter theory,JHEP11(2024) 147 [2406.17011]

    T. Kukolj,Four-point functions and contact terms from higher-spin Ward identities of Chern-Simons-matter theory,JHEP11(2024) 147 [2406.17011]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Yacoby,Scalar Correlators in Bosonic Chern-Simons Vector Models,1805.11627

    R. Yacoby,Scalar Correlators in Bosonic Chern-Simons Vector Models,1805.11627

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    P. Jain, S. Jain, B. Sahoo, K. S. Dhruva and A. Zade,Mapping Large N Slightly Broken Higher Spin (SBHS) theory correlators to free theory correlators,JHEP12(2023) 173 [2207.05101]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Andrei et al.,Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications,J

    N. Andrei et al.,Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications,J. Phys. A53 (2020) 453002 [1810.05697]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Komargodski, F

    Z. Komargodski, F. K. Popov and B. C. Rayhaun,Defect anomalies, a spin-flux duality, and Boson-Kondo problems,JHEP04(2026) 071 [2508.14963]

    2026

  17. [25]

    Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun

    E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun. Math. Phys.121 (1989) 351

    1989

  18. [26]

    Pestun,Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun

    V. Pestun,Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun. Math. Phys.313(2012) 71 [0712.2824]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Giombi and S

    S. Giombi and S. Komatsu,Exact Correlators on the Wilson Loop inN= 4SYM: Localization, Defect CFT, and Integrability,JHEP05(2018) 109 [1802.05201]. – 52 –

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Correa, J

    D. Correa, J. Henn, J. Maldacena and A. Sever,An exact formula for the radiation of a moving quark in N=4 super Yang Mills,JHEP06(2012) 048 [1202.4455]

    2012 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Giombi and S

    S. Giombi and S. Komatsu,More Exact Results in the Wilson Loop Defect CFT: Bulk-Defect OPE, Nonplanar Corrections and Quantum Spectral Curve,J. Phys. A52(2019) 125401 [1811.02369]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    S. Jain, R. R. John and V. Malvimat,Constraining momentum space correlators using slightly broken higher spin symmetry,JHEP04(2021) 231 [2008.08610]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ferrando, A

    G. Ferrando, A. Sever and E. Urisman,Correlators of line defect and local operator in conformal field theories with a slightly broken higher-spin symmetry,JHEP10(2025) 204 [2505.10232]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Gabai, A

    B. Gabai, A. Sever and D.-l. Zhong,Line Operators in Chern-Simons–Matter Theories and Bosonization in Three Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 121604 [2204.05262]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Gabai, A

    B. Gabai, A. Sever and D.-l. Zhong,Line operators in Chern-Simons-Matter theories and Bosonization in Three Dimensions II: Perturbative analysis and all-loop resummation,JHEP 04(2023) 070 [2212.02518]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Kazakov, F. Loebbert, D. M¨ uller and D.-l. Zhong,Yangian Symmetry for Bi-Scalar Loop Amplitudes,JHEP05(2018) 003 [1704.01967]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Kazakov, F. Loebbert, D. M¨ uller and D.-l. Zhong,Yangian Symmetry for Fishnet Feynman Graphs,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 121901 [1708.00007]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Loebbert and H

    F. Loebbert and H. Mathur,The Feyn-structure of Yangian symmetry,JHEP01(2025) 112 [2410.11936]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Loebbert, D

    F. Loebbert, D. M¨ uller and H. M¨ unkler,Yangian Bootstrap for Conformal Feynman Integrals,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 066006 [1912.05561]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Mazac,Analytic bounds and emergence of AdS 2 physics from the conformal bootstrap, JHEP04(2017) 146 [1611.10060]

    D. Mazac,Analytic bounds and emergence of AdS 2 physics from the conformal bootstrap, JHEP04(2017) 146 [1611.10060]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Lemos, P

    M. Lemos, P. Liendo, M. Meineri and S. Sarkar,Universality at large transverse spin in defect CFT,JHEP09(2018) 091 [1712.08185]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    R. A. Lanzetta, S. Liu and M. A. Metlitski,The beginning of the endpoint bootstrap for conformal line defects,2508.14964

  33. [41]

    Lang and W

    K. Lang and W. R¨ uhl,The critical O(N) sigma model at dimensions 2<d<4: a list of quasiprimary fields,Nucl. Phys. B402(1993) 573

    1993

  34. [42]

    Gabai, A

    B. Gabai, A. Sever and D.-l. Zhong,Bootstrapping smooth conformal defects in Chern-Simons-matter theories,JHEP03(2024) 055 [2312.17132]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Br´ ezin and D

    E. Br´ ezin and D. J. Wallace,Critical Behavior of a Classical Heisenberg Ferromagnet with Many Degrees of Freedom,Phys. Rev. B7(1973) 1967

    1973

  36. [44]

    Guadagnini, M

    E. Guadagnini, M. Martellini and M. Mintchev,Wilson Lines in Chern-Simons Theory and Link Invariants,Nucl. Phys. B330(1990) 575. – 53 –

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.