Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 91 references

Magnetic active matter across scales

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that a single physical ingredient, the magnetic dipole moment carried by each self-propelled particle, unifies magnetic active matter across twelve orders of magnitude in size, with the same anisotropic dipole…

desk verdict A useful, well-organized review whose headline cross-scale parameter space rests on an undefined energy scale for athermal systems; fix that and it deserves publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11875 v1 pith:SYNI6XVC submitted 2026-08-12 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

Francisca Guzmán-Lastra , Margaret Rosenberg , Marco Musacchio , Lorenzo Caprini , Hartmut Löwen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords activemattermagneticdipoleself-propelledparticlesdipolarinteractionscollectivebehaviorself-assemblymicrorobotsPécletnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the permanent magnetic dipole moment carried by each self-propelled particle is a unifying ingredient across magnetic active matter at all length scales, from magnetotactic bacteria through colloidal microswimmers to centimeter-scale robots. The central claim is that the same anisotropic, unscreened $1/r^3$ dipole–dipole interaction governs the competition between chain formation, ring closure, and collective motion, provided each system is characterized by two dimensionless numbers: the Péclet number $Pe = v_0/(D_R \sigma)$ and the magnetic coupling parameter $\lambda = \mu_0 m^2/(4\pi \sigma^3 k_B T)$. A sympathetic reader would care because, if the claim holds, theoretical predictions and experimental insight developed for one scale transfer directly to another, making magnetic active matter a general laboratory for nonequilibrium physics and a design platform for programmable materials, biomedical microrobots, and soft robots.

What carries the argument

The central object is the point-dipole approximation for a magnetic active particle, in which each particle carries a magnetic moment $\mathbf{m}$ aligned with its orientation, producing a field $\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi r^3}[3(\mathbf{m}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{r}})\hat{\mathbf{r}}-\mathbf{m}]$ and a pairwise interaction $U^D_{ij} = \frac{\mu_0 m^2}{4\pi r^3_{ij}}[\hat{\mathbf{n}}_i\cdot\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j - 3(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_i\cdot\hat{\mathbf{r}}_{ij})(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j\cdot\hat{\mathbf{r}}_{ij})/r^2_{ij}]$. This $1/r^3$ interaction is simultaneously long-ranged, anisotropic, and unscreened, which is the physical origin of the competing chain, ring, and collective states. The organizing scaffold of the review is the two-parameter map built from the Péclet number (activity) and the magnetic coupling parameter (interaction strength), with extensions to particle shape via shifted dipoles, dumbbells, and multipoles, and to wet systems via Stokeslet and rotlet hydrodynamic couplings.

What would settle it

Measure the force between two magnetically soft active particles inside a dense many-body suspension and compare it with the pairwise point-dipole force $U^D_{ij}$ computed from isolated pairs at the same separation and orientation; a deviation comparable in size to the pairwise term would show that the pairwise-additive basis of the unified description breaks down. A complementary test is to locate two systems on the $(Pe, \lambda)$ plane that share both parameters but exhibit different collective phases because of shape anisotropy or hydrodynamic pusher/puller differences, which would show that two parameters do not fully organize the phenomenology.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the magnetic dipole moment provides a unifying thread across twelve orders of magnitude in length: whether the dipole is biomineralized in a magnetotactic bacterium, embedded in a colloidal microswimmer, or encased in a centimeter-scale robot, the same anisotropic $1/r^3$ interaction governs the competition between chain formation, ring closure, and dynamic collective motion. The review synthesizes evidence that the Péclet number and the magnetic coupling parameter organize this phenomenology into a single parameter space encompassing biological, colloidal, and granular realizations. It also argues that the theoretical framework built from overdamped and inertial Langevin dynamics, Stokeslet and rotlet hydrodynamics, and point-dipole to dumbbell interaction models is predictive beyond the systems already studied.

Load-bearing premise

The account assumes that every magnetic active unit is adequately described as a point dipole and that the interaction between many particles is the sum of independent pairwise dipole forces; the paper itself acknowledges that this pairwise superposition does not hold fully for many-body soft magnetic systems, and if that failure is significant in the systems compared, the claimed cross-scale unity is weaker than stated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A phase diagram built for colloidal magnetic microswimmers should transfer, at matching $Pe$ and $\lambda$, to macroscopic magnetic robots, so designs can be tested at the scale that is cheapest or most convenient.
  • Dipolar coupling suppresses motility-induced phase separation in active dipolar particles; the same suppression should appear in any magnetic active system with comparable $Pe$ and $\lambda$.
  • External fields and geometric confinement act as control knobs across all scales: field strength selects between disordered chains, percolated networks, and polarized clusters, while curved or polygonal boundaries stabilize circulating or clustered states without time-varying fields.
  • The two-parameter description gives a practical route toward programmable assembly: choose the target phase on the $(Pe, \lambda)$ plane, then realize it in a biological, colloidal, or granular system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-parameter collapse is quantitatively accurate, one can construct a design rule for new magnetic active systems: measure or estimate $Pe$ and $\lambda$, and read off the expected collective state from the cross-scale map.
  • The review's own caveat about pairwise additivity suggests a natural stress test: dense soft-magnetic systems may need an extra parameter measuring many-body magnetization, and the unified picture could fail precisely where the point-dipole model is most convenient.
  • The reported discovery that entire eukaryotic cells can acquire magnetoreception through endosymbiosis opens the possibility that the magnetic active-matter framework extends to systems beyond the bacteria, colloids, and robots surveyed here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review surveys experimental and theoretical work on active particles that carry a permanent magnetic dipole moment, spanning nanoscale magnetic nanoparticles, microscale magnetotactic bacteria and colloidal microswimmers, and macroscale granular robots such as Hexbugs and vibrobots. The central organizing claim is that two dimensionless parameters—the Péclet number Pe (Eq. 3) and the magnetic coupling parameter λ (Eq. 5)—locate all these systems in a common parameter space (Fig. 1), and that the anisotropic 1/r^3 dipole–dipole interaction governs chaining, ring closure, swarming, and related self-organization across roughly twelve orders of magnitude in length. The manuscript reviews point-dipole models, overdamped and inertial Langevin equations, hydrodynamic couplings, particle-shape effects, confinement, and external fields, and concludes with open challenges in programmable materials, biomedical microrobotics, and nonequilibrium physics.

Significance. If the cross-scale synthesis is quantitatively sound, the review provides a valuable organizing framework for an interdisciplinary and fast-growing field, connecting biological magnetotaxis, colloidal self-assembly, and robotic active matter. The manuscript is well-structured and covers an extensive, current bibliography, and it is careful to acknowledge the pairwise-additivity limitation of the point-dipole description (Sec. 2.1). However, the paper's headline quantitative claim—that Pe and λ organize all surveyed systems into a single parameter space—is not fully supported because λ is defined through the environmental thermal energy, whereas the macroscale systems in Fig. 1 are explicitly described as athermal. This is a correctness-risk concern about a load-bearing element of the review, not a circularity problem, and it is fixable by adding an operational definition of an effective noise temperature or by recasting the figure as a schematic rather than a quantitative map. The review remains a potentially useful reference after this issue is addressed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (5); Fig. 1; Sec. 2.0.3; Sec. 6] The magnetic coupling parameter λ in Eq. (5) is defined as μ0 m^2/(4π σ^3 k_B T) with T the environmental temperature. Yet Sec. 2.0.3 states that at macroscopic scales thermal fluctuations are negligible and stochasticity arises from mechanical jitter and substrate inhomogeneities, and Sec. 3 notes that D_R is unrelated to environmental temperature for most active matter. For a centimeter-scale magnet with m ≈ 10^-2 A m^2 and σ ≈ 0.05 m, Eq. (5) with T ≈ 300 K gives λ of order 10^15, which cannot produce the overlapping regions shown in Fig. 1. The manuscript never defines an effective temperature or an alternative energy scale for these athermal systems, so the positions of granular realizations in Fig. 1 are not reproducible, and the central claim in Sec. 6 that Pe and λ organize biological, colloidal, and granular systems into a single parameter space is not quantitatively supported. Please either provide an operational definition of the effective noise temperature (e.g., through the measured translational diffusivity and an Einstein-like relation) or explicitly and prominently recast Fig. 1 and the corresponding Sec. 6 claims as a schematic, order-of-magnitude comparison.
  2. [Sec. 3, Sec. 3.1, Sec. 4] The two-parameter description in Fig. 1 neglects effects that the review itself identifies as important: hydrodynamic interactions and particle shape. The microscale equations (Sec. 3) are overdamped with solvent-mediated Stokeslet and rotlet couplings, while the macroscale equations (Sec. 3.1) are inertial, dry, and dominated by self-alignment and substrate friction. Section 4 further shows that shape anisotropy (ellipsoids, cubes, shifted dipoles) changes ground states and self-assembly. Without evidence that these additional parameters are subdominant for the particular phenomena being compared, the claim that Pe and λ alone 'organize this phenomenology' (Sec. 6) is an oversimplification. The authors should either justify the dominance of the two chosen parameters for the mapped systems or qualify the parameter-space claim as a coarse-grained categorization rather than a complete physical characterization.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (9b)] Equation (9b) appears to contain a typographical error: the orientation dynamics mixes the translational noise term ξ_i,T with the cross-product structure, and the placement of the cross product relative to the torque terms is unclear. As written, the equation is dimensionally inconsistent. Please correct the expression and verify that the translational noise is not inadvertently added to the rotational equation.
  2. [Sec. 1 (Introduction)] The introduction refers to the 'conclusive section (Sec. 5)', but the conclusions actually appear in Sec. 6, after Sec. 5 on confinement and external fields. The cross-reference should be updated.
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains typographical errors: 'strenght' should be 'strength', and the fragment 'magnetic strenght : spinningmagnets' appears to be an incomplete label. The activity label might also be intended to denote Pe.
  4. [Sec. 2.0.2] The text '10–30magnetosome crystals' is missing a space before 'magnetosome'; this should read '10–30 magnetosome crystals'.
  5. [References] Several references contain inline editorial annotations (e.g., refs. [7], [12], [13], [38], [41], [60], [62], [63]) that appear to be reviewer or author notes rather than standard bibliographic content. These annotations should be removed or moved to proper footnotes or a separate notes section, as they are not part of the published citation format.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: this is a synthetic review whose central claims organize independent published results; self-citations are present but not load-bearing, and Eq. (5) is a definition, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper is a review, not a derivation. Its central claim—that the same 1/r^3 dipole interaction appears across scales and that Pe and lambda organize the phenomenology in Fig. 1—is an interpretive synthesis of externally published experiments and simulations, not a prediction derived from its own equations. Eq. (4) is the standard dipole potential; Eq. (5) defines lambda as an energy ratio. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction, and no result is shown to equal its input by construction. The paper's self-citations (e.g., refs. 11, 29, 59, 66, 67) support specific modeling or simulation statements, but the cross-scale thesis does not rest on those citations: the same statements are corroborated by independent groups (e.g., refs. 17, 23, 30, 42, 68, 72). The skeptical concern that Eq. (5) is not specified for athermal granular systems is a reproducibility/definitional gap, not a circularity, because lambda is defined independently of the phenomena it is used to classify. Accordingly, no circular step meets the required evidentiary standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters; Pe and λ are dimensionless characterizations defined in Eqs. (3) and (5), not fitted quantities. The modeling axioms above are the load-bearing assumptions of the survey. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Particles can be modeled as point dipoles (Eq. 1) when interparticle distance exceeds the magnetic source size.
    Invoked throughout Sections 2 and 3; the authors discuss validity limits in Section 2.1, including shifted-dipole and dumbbell corrections.
  • domain assumption Many-body dipolar interactions can be approximated as pairwise additive superposition (Eq. 4).
    Explicitly flagged in Section 2.1 as not fully holding for many-body soft magnetic systems.
  • domain assumption Microscale swimmers obey overdamped Langevin dynamics with negligible inertia (Eq. 2).
    Standard low-Reynolds-number assumption used in Section 3.
  • domain assumption Macroscale robots have inertial translation but overdamped rotation and a self-alignment torque (Eq. 9).
    Introduced in Section 3.1 and justified by reference [65]; this regime differs qualitatively from the microscale case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic active matter across scales." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SYNI6XVC

@misc{pith2026260811875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic active matter across scales},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SYNI6XVC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11875}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetic interactions provide a versatile and powerful tool for controlling and organizing active matter, where individual units continuously consume energy to drive autonomous motion. These interactions arise naturally in biological systems, such as magnetotactic bacteria, and can be engineered into synthetic platforms, including colloidal microswimmers, magnetic nanoparticles, and macroscopic granular robots. This review focuses on active, self-propelled particles that carry an intrinsic magnetic dipole moment, powered by their own energy consumption rather than driven by external fields; here, the dipole moment mediates interactions and self-organization, not propulsion. We survey experimental and theoretical studies across all length scales, showing how dipolar interactions shape single-particle dynamics, collective behavior, and self-organization. We discuss models incorporating pairwise dipolar forces and confinement, and examine emergent phenomena such as chaining, swarming, and tunable pattern formation. We close by outlining challenges and opportunities in the design, control, and application of magnetic active systems, from programmable materials and biomedical actuation to nonequilibrium physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11875 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic overview of magnetic active matter. The schematic overview reports several experimental realizations of magnetic active matter as a function of their activity, Pe = v0 DRσ , and the strength of the magnetic interactions, λ = µ0m2 4πkBT σ3 . The experimental realizations are also classified into colloids [17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24] (red area), granular sys￾tems [25, 26, 27, 28, 29] (blue area) and biological s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Active magnetic particles at different scales. Active magnetic particles at various scales: from (a) nanometer-sized helical magnetic propellers [39], through (b) micrometer￾scale magnetotactic bacteria [40] and (c) magnetic rotors [15], to (d) centimeter-scale magnetic robots [28]. where µ0 = 4π ×10−7 N A−2 and ˆr is the unit vector from dipole to observation point. The 1/r3 decay makes dipolar interactions simulta… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dipolar active particle. Sketch of a dipolar active particle: the cap of the particle indicates its orientation; the black arrow represents its self-propelled velocity, v0, while the white arrow denotes its dipolar moment, m. The violet lines in the background represent the magnetic field lines generated by the dipolar moment. terized by its position ri(t) and unit orientation vector nˆi(t) = [cos θi ,sin θi ], whic… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hydrodynamic flow fields. Hydrodynamic flow fields (color gradient) produced by (a) pusher, neutral, and puller particles [59], (b) a Janus particle [64], and (c) magnetotactic bacteria plumes [18]. 3.1. Macroscale: Inertial Particles with Overdamped Rotation Macroscop…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Magnetic ground state of particles with different shapes. Magnetic ground state for (a) spherical particles, (b) ellipsoidal particles, and (c) cubic particles. which is also easy to see from the interaction potential (4). This minimum is equally the origin of the char…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. Xie, M. Sun, X. Fan, Z. Lin, W. Chen, L. Wang, L. Dong, Q. He, Reconfigurable magnetic microrobot swarm: Multimode transformation, locomotion, and manipulation, Sci. Robot. 4 (28) (2019) eaav8006. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aav8006

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aav8006 2019

  2. [2]

    Ortiz-Ambriz, C

    A. Ortiz-Ambriz, C. Nisoli, C. Reichhardt, C. J. Reichhardt, P. Tierno, Colloquium: Ice rule and emergent frustration in particle ice and beyond, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (4) (2019) 041003. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.041003

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.041003 2019

  3. [3]

    Y. Kim, X. Zhao, Magnetic soft materials and robots, Chem. Rev. 122 (5) (2022) 5317. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00481

    doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00481 2022

  4. [4]

    D. Jin, L. Zhang, Collective behaviors of magnetic active matter: Recent progress toward reconfigurable, adaptive, and multifunctional swarming micro/nanorobots, Acc. Chem. Res. 55 (1) (2021) 98–109. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00619

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00619 2021

  5. [5]

    Rigoni, M

    C. Rigoni, M. P. Holl, A. Scacchi, E. Stråka, F. Sohrabi, M. P. Haataja, M. Sammalkorpi, J. V. I. Timonen, Active rosensweig patterns (2025). arXiv:2510.09099. 21

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Kumar, H

    N. Kumar, H. Soni, S. Ramaswamy, A. Sood, Flocking at a dis- tance in active granular matter, Nat. Commun. 5 (1) (2014) 4688. doi:10.1038/ncomms5688

    doi:10.1038/ncomms5688 2014

  7. [7]

    Casiulis, E

    M. Casiulis, E. Arbel, C. van Waes, Y. Lahini, S. Martiniani, N. Oppen- heimer, M. Y. B. Zion, A geometric condition for robot-swarm cohesion and cluster–flock transition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (37) (2025) e2502211122,∗Identifies a geometric condition controlling robot-swarm cohesion and the cluster–flock transition in macroscopic active matte...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2502211122 2025

  8. [8]

    A. P. Antonov, L. Caprini, A. Ldov, C. Scholz, H. Löwen, Inertial active matter with coulomb friction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (19) (2024) 198301. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.198301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.198301 2024

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Scholz, M

    C. Scholz, M. Engel, T. Pöschel, Rotating robots move collectively and self- organize, Nat. Commun. 9 (1) (2018) 931. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03154-7

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    Reiche, L

    M. Reiche, L. Zentner, T. I. Becker, On the dynamics of the vibration- driven multipole magnetoactive bristlebot, Arch. Appl. Mech. 95 (7) (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Muñoz-Obreque, O

    P. Muñoz-Obreque, O. Garrido, D. Romero, E. Burgos, H. Löwen, F. C. Guzmán-Lastra, Dynamics of magnetic self-propelled particles in a har- monic trap, Soft Matter (06 2026). doi:10.1039/D6SM00387G

    2026 doi

  4. [12]

    Fitzgerald, C

    E. Fitzgerald, C. Clavaud, D. Das, I. C. D. Lenton, S. R. Waitukaitis, Rolling at right angles: Magnetic anisotropy enables dual-anisotropic active matter, Phys. Rev. E 112 (2025) 065418,∗Introduces dual-anisotropic active matter in which magnetic shape anisotropy enables roll...

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    A. P. Stikuts, D. Cao, H. Massana-Cid, W. Wang, P. Tierno, Anisotropy-stabilized propulsion and cycloidal cargo transport in driven magnetic platelets, Nano Lett.∗Reveals anisotropy-stabilized 22 propulsion and cycloidal cargo transport in driven magnetic col- loids, a route t...

    2026 doi

  6. [14]

    F. R. Koessel, S. Jabbari-Farouji, Emergent pattern formation of active magnetic suspensions in an external field, New J. Phys. 22 (10) (2020) 103007. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abb64d

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Martinez-Pedrero, A

    F. Martinez-Pedrero, A. Ortiz-Ambriz, I. Pagonabarraga, P. Tierno, Colloidal microworms propelling via a cooperative hydrody- namic conveyor belt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (13) (2015) 138301. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.138301

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    Kiani, D

    B. Kiani, D. Faivre, S. Klumpp, Elastic properties of magnetosome chains, New J. Phys. 17 (4) (2015) 043007. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/4/043007

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    Tierno, F

    P. Tierno, F. Sagués, Steering trajectories in magnetically actuated col- loidal propellers, Eur. Phys. J. E 35 (2012) 71. doi:10.1140/epje/i2012- 12071-4

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    Théry, L

    A. Théry, L. Le Nagard, J.-C. Ono-dit Biot, C. Fradin, K. Dalnoki-Veress, E. Lauga, Self-organisation and convection of confined magnetotactic bac- teria, Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 13578. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70270-0

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    Vincenti, G

    B. Vincenti, G. Ramos, M. L. Cordero, C. Douarche, R. Soto, E. Clement, Magnetotactic bacteria in a droplet self-assemble into a rotary motor, Nat. Commun. 10 (1) (2019) 5082. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13031-6

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    J. Yan, S. C. Bae, S. Granick, Colloidal superstructures programmed into magnetic janus particles, Adv. Mater. 27 (5) (2015) 874–879. doi:10.1002/adma.201403857

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    Mehdizadeh Taheri, M

    S. Mehdizadeh Taheri, M. Michaelis, T. Friedrich, B. Förster, M. Drech- sler, F. M. Römer, P. Bösecke, T. Narayanan, B. Weber, I. Re- hberg, S. Rosenfeldt, S. Förster, Self-assembly of smallest magnetic 23 particles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (47) (2015) 14484–14489. d...

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    I. S. M. Khalil, H. C. Dijkslag, L. Abelmann, S. Misra, Magnetosperm: A microrobot that navigates using weak magnetic fields, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 (22) (2014) 223701. doi:10.1063/1.4880035

    2014 doi

  15. [23]

    Kaiser, A

    A. Kaiser, A. Snezhko, I. S. Aranson, Flocking ferromagnetic colloids, Sci. Adv. 3 (2) (2017) e1601469. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601469

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, W. T. M. Irvine, The odd free surface flows of a colloidal chiral fluid, Nat. Phys. 15 (2019) 1188–1194. doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0603-8

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    González-Gutiérrez, J

    J. González-Gutiérrez, J. L. Carrillo-Estrada, J. C. Ruiz-Suárez, Aggrega- tion and dendritic growth in a magnetic granular system, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (12) (2013) P12015. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2013/12/P12015

    2013 doi

  18. [26]

    Schönke, T

    J. Schönke, T. M. Schneider, I. Rehberg, Infinite geometric frustra- tion in a cubic dipole cluster, Phys. Rev. B 91 (2) (2015) 020410(R). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.020410

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    Kokot, S

    G. Kokot, S. Das, R. G. Winkler, G. Gompper, I. S. Aranson, A. Snezhko, Active turbulence in a gas of self-assembled spinners, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114 (49) (2017) 12870–12875. doi:10.1073/pnas.1710188114

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    Sepúlveda, F

    N. Sepúlveda, F. Guzmán-Lastra, M. Carrasco, B. González, E. Hamm, A. Concha, Bioinspired magnetic active matter and the physical limits of magnetotaxis, arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.04889 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Musacchio, M

    M. Musacchio, M. Felber, M. Paoluzzi, A. Gnoli, A. Puglisi, L. Angelani, Fluidization induced by magnetic interactions in confined active matter, Physical Review E 113 (5) (2026) 055413

    2026

  22. [30]

    Mármol, E

    M. Mármol, E. Gachon, D. Faivre, Colloquium: Magnetotactic bacte- ria: From flagellar motor to collective effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (2) 24 (2024) 021001,∗∗Authoritative colloquium connecting the single-cell magnetic motor of magnetotactic bacteria to their emergent collec- t...

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    C. L. Dennis, R. Ivkov, Physics of heat generation using magnetic nanopar- ticles for hyperthermia, Int. J. Hyperthermia 29 (8) (2013) 715–729. doi:10.3109/02656736.2013.836758

    2013

  24. [32]

    Karimi, L

    Z. Karimi, L. Karimi, H. Shokrollahi, Nano-magnetic particles used in biomedicine: Core and coating materials, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 33 (5) (2013) 2465–2475. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2013.01.045

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    S. Dutz, R. Hergt, Magnetic particle hyperthermia—a promising tu- mour therapy?, Nanotechnology 25 (45) (2014) 452001. doi:10.1088/0957- 4484/25/45/452001

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    J. L. Kirschvink, M. M. Walker, C. E. Diebel, Magnetite-based magnetore- ception, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11 (4) (2001) 462–467. doi:10.1016/s0959- 4388(00)00235-x

    2001 doi

  27. [35]

    W. Lin, J. L. Kirschvink, G. A. Paterson, D. A. Bazylinski, Y. Pan, On the origin of microbial magnetoreception, Natl. Sci. Rev. 7 (2) (2020) 472–479. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwz065

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    Johnsen, K

    S. Johnsen, K. J. Lohmann, Magnetoreception in animals, Phys. Today 61 (3) (2008) 29–35. doi:10.1063/1.2897947

    2008 doi

  29. [37]

    J. L. Kirschvink, A. Kobayashi-Kirschvink, B. J. Woodford, Magnetite biomineralizationinthehumanbrain., Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.89(16) (1992) 7683–7687. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.16.7683

    1992 doi

  30. [38]

    Bolzoni, C

    R. Bolzoni, C. L. Monteil, B. Alonso, M. Bergot, D. M. Chevrier, C. Godon, N. Menguy, S. Fouteau, V. Da Cunha, F. Skouri-Panet, et al., Magnetoreception in a freshwater ciliate arises from endosymbiosis, Nat. 25 Commun.∗∗Reports that an entire eukaryotic cell acquires magnetor...

    2026 doi

  31. [39]

    Klumpp, C

    S. Klumpp, C. T. Lefèvre, M. Bennet, D. Faivre, Swimming with magnets: from biological organisms to synthetic devices, Phys. Rep. 789 (2019) 1–54. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.007

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Faivre, D

    D. Faivre, D. Schuler, Magnetotactic bacteria and magnetosomes, Chem. Rev. 108 (11) (2008) 4875–4898. doi:10.1021/cr078258w

    2008 doi

  33. [41]

    Birjukovs, G

    M. Birjukovs, G. Kitenbergs, A. Cebers, K. Bente, D. Faivre, Mag- netic control of magnetotactic bacteria swarms, Phys. Rev. Fluids 10 (8) (2025) 083101,∗Achieves magnetic control of magnetotactic bacterial swarms, linking field-driven steering to collective hydrodynamic patte...

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    Tierno, Recent advances in anisotropic magnetic colloids: realization, assembly and applications, Phys

    P. Tierno, Recent advances in anisotropic magnetic colloids: realization, assembly and applications, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16(43) (2014) 23515– 23528. doi:10.1039/c4cp03099k

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    Ghosh, P

    A. Ghosh, P. Fischer, Controlled propulsion of artificial mag- netic nanostructured propellers, Nano Lett. 9 (6) (2009) 2243–2245. doi:10.1021/nl900186w

    2009 doi

  36. [44]

    Q. Li, H. Chen, X. Feng, C. Yu, F. Feng, Y. Chai, P. Lu, T. Song, X. Wang, L. Yao, Nanoparticle-regulated semiartificial magnetotactic bacteria with tunable magnetic moment and magnetic sensitivity, Small 15 (15) (2019) 1900427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201900427

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    Y. Gao, B. Sprinkle, E. Springer, D. W. Marr, N. Wu, Rolling of soft microbots with tunable traction, Sci. Adv. 9 (16) (2023) eadg0919. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg0919. 26

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    Snezhko, M

    A. Snezhko, M. Belkin, I. S. Aranson, W.-K. Kwok, Self-assembled magnetic surface swimmers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 118103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.118103

    2009 doi

  39. [47]

    Ledesma-Motolinía, J

    M. Ledesma-Motolinía, J. Carrillo-Estrada, A. Escobar, F. Donado, P. Castro-Villarreal, Magnetized granular particles running and tum- bling on the circle s 1, Phys. Rev. E 107 (2) (2023) 024902. doi:10.1103/physreve.107.024902

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    Arbel, L

    E. Arbel, L. Buise, C. van Waes, N. Oppenheimer, Y. Lahini, M. Y. Ben Zion, A mechanical route for cooperative transport in autonomous robotic swarms, Nat. Commun. 16 (1) (2025) 7519. doi:10.1038/s41467- 025-61896-7

    2025 doi

  41. [49]

    Bonilla, L.-M

    F. Bonilla, L.-M. Lacroix, T. Blon, Magnetic ground states in nanocuboids of cubic magnetocrystalline anisotropy, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 428 (2017) 394–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.12.069

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    B. Ren, A. Ruditskiy, J. H. K. Song, I. Kretzschmar, Assembly behavior of iron oxide-capped janus particles in a magnetic field, Langmuir 28 (2) (2011) 1149–1156. doi:10.1021/la203969f

    2011 doi

  43. [51]

    T. W. Long, U. M. Córdova-Figueroa, I. Kretzschmar, Measur- ing, modeling, and predicting the magnetic assembly rate of 2d- staggered janus particle chains, Langmuir 35 (24) (2019) 8121–8130. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00163

    2019 doi

  44. [52]

    J. A. Victoria-Camacho, R. A. DeLaCruz-Araujo, I. Kretzschmar, U. M. Córdova-Figueroa, Self-assembly of magnetic colloids with radially shifted dipoles, Soft Matter 16 (10) (2020) 2460–2472. doi:10.1039/c9sm02020a

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    Steinbach, M

    G. Steinbach, M. Schreiber, D. Nissen, M. Albrecht, E. Novak, P. A. Sánchez, S. S. Kantorovich, S. Gemming, A. Erbe, Field-responsive col- loidal assemblies defined by magnetic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. E 100 (2019) 012608. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.100.012608. 27

    2019 doi

  46. [54]

    Neumann, A

    M. Neumann, A. Strobel, Y. Al-Saadawi, G. Steinbach, A. Erbe, S. Gemming, A two-parameter model for colloidal particles with an ex- tended magnetic cap, Phys. Status Solidi A 216 (19) (2019) 1900506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201900506

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    Rosenberg, H

    M. Rosenberg, H. Löwen, Windmilling clusters of active quadrupoles, J. Chem. Phys. 164 (8) (2026) 084901. doi:10.1063/5.0304745

    2026 doi

  48. [56]

    D.Mostarac, A.A.Kuznetsov, S.Helbig, C.Abert, P.A.Sánchez, D.Suess, S. S. Kantorovich, Thermal stoner-wohlfarth model for magnetodynamics of single domain nanoparticles: Implementation and validation, Phys. Rev. B 111 (2025) 014438. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.014438

    2025 doi

  49. [57]

    T. Q. Bui, S. D. Oberdick, F. M. Abel, M. J. Donahue, K. N. Quelhas, C. L. Dennis, T. E. Cleveland, Y. Liu, S. I. Woods, Magnetodynamics of short nanoparticle chains, Sci. Rep. 15 (1) (2025) 43507. doi:10.1038/s41598-025- 22864-9

    2025 doi

  50. [58]

    Romeis, Beyond the dipole approximation: A compact operator form to describe magnetizable many-body systems (2026)

    D. Romeis, Beyond the dipole approximation: A compact operator form to describe magnetizable many-body systems (2026). arXiv:2604.13647

    2026 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Guzmán-Lastra, A

    F. Guzmán-Lastra, A. Kaiser, H. Löwen, Fission and fusion scenarios for magnetic microswimmer clusters, Nat. Commun. 7 (1) (2016) 13519. doi:10.1038/ncomms13519

    2016 doi

  52. [60]

    Parage, S

    B. Parage, S. Jabbari-Farouji, Modulation of nonequilibrium structures of active dipolar particles by an external field, Phys. Rev. E 112 (6) (2025) 065402,∗Shows how an external field tunes the nonequilibrium structures of active dipolar particles, mapping the crossover from ...

    2025 doi

  53. [61]

    Telezki, S

    V. Telezki, S. Klumpp, Simulations of structure formation by con- fined dipolar active particles, Soft Matter 16 (46) (2020) 10537–10547. doi:10.1039/d0sm00926a. 28

    2020 doi

  54. [62]

    Q. Gao, M. Kim, D. Von Arx, E. Zhang, X. Zhang, H. Ye, C. Vogt, C. Ehmke, D. Corsino, F. Catania, et al., Soft magnetic microrobots with remote sensing and communication capabilities, Nat. Commun. 16 (1) (2025) 10489,∗Demonstrates soft magnetic microrobots that integrate shape...

    2025 doi

  55. [63]

    J. L. Domingos, Advanced modeling methodologies for anisotropic mag- netic colloids, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 84 (2026) 102039,∗Com- panion review of advanced modeling methodologies for anisotropic mag- netic colloids, complementing the point-dipole framework used he...

    2026

  56. [64]

    A. I. Campbell, S. J. Ebbens, P. Illien, R. Golestanian, Experimental ob- servation of flow fields around active janus spheres, Nat. Commun. 10 (1) (2019) 3952. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11842-1

    2019 doi

  57. [65]

    Baconnier, O

    P. Baconnier, O. Dauchot, V. Démery, G. Düring, S. Henkes, C. Huepe, A. Shee, Self-aligning polar active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97 (1) (2025) 015007,∗∗Comprehensive review establishing self-alignment as an organiz- ing principle of polar active matter, underpinning the macros...

    2025 doi

  58. [66]

    Musacchio, A

    M. Musacchio, A. P. Antonov, H. Löwen, L. Caprini, Self-alignment and anti-self-alignment suppress motility-induced phase separation in active systems, J. Chem. Phys. 162 (24) (2025). doi:10.1063/5.0274454

    2025 doi

  59. [67]

    Guzmán-Lastra, N

    F. Guzmán-Lastra, N. Sepúlveda, Collective phases in overdamped magnetic self-propelled spherocylinders, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.19498 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  60. [68]

    G.-J. Liao, C. K. Hall, S. H. Klapp, Dynamical self-assembly of dipolar active brownian particles in two dimensions, Soft Matter 16 (9) (2020) 2208–2223. doi:10.1039/c9sm01539f. 29

    2020 doi

  61. [69]

    Kantorovich, E

    S. Kantorovich, E. Pyanzina, F. Sciortino, The influence of shape anisotropy on the microstructure of magnetic dipolar particles, Soft Matter 9 (29) (2013) 6594–6603. doi:10.1039/c3sm50197c

    2013 doi

  62. [70]

    Vanesse, E

    N. Vanesse, E. Opsomer, G. Lumay, N. Vandewalle, Collective dynamics of dipolar self-propelled particles, Phys. Rev. E 108 (2) (2023) 024608. doi:10.1103/physreve.108.024608

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    Rovigatti, J

    L. Rovigatti, J. M. Tavares, F. Sciortino, Self-assembly in chains, rings, and branches: A single component system with two critical points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 168302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.168302

    2013 doi

  64. [72]

    Kaiser, K

    A. Kaiser, K. Popowa, H. Löwen, Active dipole clusters: From helical motion to fission, Phys. Rev. E 92 (1) (2015) 012301. doi:10.1103/physreve.92.012301

    2015 doi

  65. [73]

    Kelidou, M

    M. Kelidou, M. Fazelzadeh, B. Parage, M. van Dijk, T. Hooijschuur, S. Jabbari-Farouji, Active string fluids and gels formed by dipolar ac- tive brownian particles in 3d, J. Chem. Phys. 161 (10) (2024) 104904. doi:10.1063/5.0215545

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    Sakaï, K

    N. Sakaï, K. Skipper, F. J. Moore, J. Russo, C. P. Royall, Dipolar colloids in three dimensions: non-equilibrium structure and re-entrant dynamics, Soft Matter 21 (26) (2025) 5204–5213. doi:10.1039/d5sm00182j

    2025 doi

  67. [75]

    Kogler, S

    F. Kogler, S. H. Klapp, Lane formation in a system of dipolar mi- croswimmers, Europhys. Lett. 110 (1) (2015) 10004. doi:10.1209/0295- 5075/110/10004

    2015 doi

  68. [76]

    Kokot, D

    G. Kokot, D. Piet, G. M. Whitesides, I. S. Aranson, A. Snezhko, Emergence of reconfigurable wires and spinners via dynamic self-assembly, Sci. Rep. 5 (1) (2015) 9528. doi:10.1038/srep09528

    2015 doi

  69. [77]

    Massana-Cid, F

    H. Massana-Cid, F. Meng, D. Matsunaga, R. Golestanian, P. Tierno, Tun- ableself-healingofmagneticallypropellingcolloidalcarpets, Nat.Commun. 10 (1) (2019) 2444. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10255-4. 30

    2019 doi

  70. [78]

    K. Han, G. Kokot, O. Tovkach, A. Glatz, I. S. Aranson, A. Snezhko, Emergence of self-organized multivortex states in flocks of active rollers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 (18) (2020) 9706–9711. doi:10.1073/pnas.2000061117

    2020 doi

  71. [79]

    G.-J. Liao, S. H. Klapp, Emergent vortices and phase separation in systems of chiral active particles with dipolar interactions, Soft Matter 17 (28) (2021) 6833–6847. doi:10.1039/d1sm00545f

    2021 doi

  72. [80]

    K. Poon, G. Singh, Are cubic nanoparticles really better than spherical nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia?, Appl. Mater. Today 44 (2025) 102787. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2025.102787

    2025

  73. [81]

    Rossi, J

    L. Rossi, J. G. Donaldson, J.-M. Meijer, A. V. Petukhov, D. Kleckner, S. S. Kantorovich, W. T. M. Irvine, A. P. Philipse, S. Sacanna, Self-organization in dipolar cube fluids constrained by competing anisotropies, Soft Matter 14 (7) (2018) 1080–1087. doi:10.1039/c7sm02174g

    2018 doi

  74. [82]

    Kaiser, S

    M. Kaiser, S. S. Kantorovich, The importance of being a cube: Active cubes in a microchannel, J. Mol. Liq. 360 (2022) 119318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119318

    2022

  75. [83]

    Kaiser, Y

    M. Kaiser, Y. Martinez, A. M. Schmidt, P. A. Sánchez, S. S. Kantorovich, Diffusion of single active-dipolar cubes in applied fields, J. Mol. Liq. 304 (2020) 112688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112688

    2020

  76. [84]

    Snezhko, I

    A. Snezhko, I. S. Aranson, Magnetic manipulation of self-assembled col- loidal asters, Nat. Mater. 10 (9) (2011) 698–703. doi:10.1038/nmat3083

    2011 doi

  77. [85]

    Harder, A

    J. Harder, A. Cacciuto, Hierarchical collective motion of a mixture of active dipolarjanusparticlesandpassivechargedcolloidsintwodimensions, Phys. Rev. E 97 (2018) 022603. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.97.022603

    2018 doi

  78. [86]

    Deißenbeck, H

    F. Deißenbeck, H. Löwen, E. C. Oğuz, Ground state of dipolar hard spheres confined in channels, Phys. Rev. E 97 (2018) 052608. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052608. 31

    2018 doi

  79. [87]

    Elschner, F

    J. Elschner, F. Farrokhzad, P. Kuświk, M. Urbaniak, F. Stobiecki, S. Akhundzada, A. Ehresmann, D. de las Heras, T. M. Fischer, Topologi- cally controlled synthesis of active colloidal bipeds, Nat. Commun. 15 (1) (2024) 5735. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50023-7

    2024 doi

  80. [88]

    K. Han, A. Glatz, A. Snezhko, Self-assembled reconfigurable pump archi- tectures via magnetic colloidal swarms, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22 (2024) 064073. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.064073

    2024 doi

  81. [89]

    Y. Wang, S. Canic, G. Kokot, A. Snezhko, I. S. Aranson, Quantifying hydrodynamic collective states of magnetic colloidal spinners and rollers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (2019) 013701. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.013701

    2019 doi

  82. [90]

    doi:10.1039/d0lc00892c

    K.Han, A.Snezhko, Programmablechiralstatesinflocksofactivemagnetic rollers, Lab Chip 21 (1) (2021) 215–222. doi:10.1039/d0lc00892c. 32

    2021 doi

  83. [160]

    doi:10.1007/s00419-025-02875-8

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.