Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 96 references

On divergences in a four-derivative scalar field theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes an exact all-orders equivalence between the beta function of the perfect square four-derivative scalar theory and that of an O(2)-symmetric $\phi^4$ theory at negative coupling, verified to three loops and used to…

desk verdict Solid three-loop computational core; the six-loop prediction rides on an all-orders mapping that is only checked to three loops and deferred to an unpublished companion. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12210 v1 pith:YCVPJPYC submitted 2026-08-12 hep-th gr-qc

Maegan Anderson , Sam Bateman , Franz Herzog , Neil Turok This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 81T1581T1781T18 PACS 11.10.Gh11.10.Hi
keywords four-derivativescalarfieldtheoryshiftsymmetryperfectsquareLagrangianbetafunctionnegative-couplingphi^4asymptoticfreedomquadraticgravityinfraredfiniteness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyses the renormalisation of a family of four-derivative, shift-symmetric scalar field theories that are asymptotically free despite containing higher time derivatives. It proves a structural theorem limiting which counterterms appear, proves that off-shell Euclidean correlators are infrared finite to all orders, and proves two non-renormalisation results: a purely cubic interaction is exactly RG invariant, and the "perfect square" form of the Lagrangian is preserved under renormalisation. The central discovery is an exact map between the perfect square theory and an O(2)-symmetric massless $\phi^4$ theory at negative coupling, $\beta_\lambda = -\frac{1}{6\lambda}\beta_g$ at $g=-3\lambda^2$. The map is verified to three loops, and importing known six-loop $\phi^4$ data yields the six-loop $\beta$ function of the perfect square theory and of the conformally flat limit of quadratic gravity. If correct, this ties a candidate UV-complete higher-derivative theory to a standard, deeply studied quantum field theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the perfect square Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{PS}} = -\frac12(\Box\sigma+\lambda(\partial_\mu\sigma\partial^\mu\sigma))^2$, together with its embedding into an $O(1,1)$-symmetric two-derivative model $\mathcal{L}_{\Omega\Upsilon} = \partial^\mu\Omega\,\partial_\mu\Upsilon - \frac{g}{6}(\Omega\Upsilon)^2$. Integrating out $\Upsilon$ and writing $\Omega = e^{\lambda\sigma}$ maps that model to the perfect square theory; since the $O(1,1)$ $\beta$ function is identical to the $O(2)$ one, the relation $\beta_\lambda = -(1/6\lambda)\beta_g$ at $g=-3\lambda^2$ follows. On the computational side the argument is carried by the $R^*$ method and an asymptotic momentum expansion, while the Gram-determinant structure of the cubic vertex explains the structural theorem and the enhanced infrared finiteness.

What would settle it

Directly compute the four-loop $\beta$ function of the perfect square theory from its own Feynman diagrams and compare it with the value obtained by substituting the known four-loop $O(2)$ $\beta$ function into $\beta_\lambda = -(1/6\lambda)\beta_g|_{g=-3\lambda^2}$; a mismatch would disprove the all-orders equivalence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is the all-orders $\beta$-function equivalence between the perfect square four-derivative scalar theory and an $O(2)$-symmetric two-derivative massless $\phi^4$ theory evaluated at negative coupling $g=-3\lambda^2$. For the perfect square Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{PS}} = -\frac12\left(\Box\sigma+\lambda(\partial_\mu\sigma\partial^\mu\sigma)\right)^2$, the paper proves that $\beta_\lambda = -\frac{1}{6\lambda}\beta_g\big|_{g=-3\lambda^2}$, with the minus sign responsible for asymptotic freedom. It checks this relation against explicit three-loop computations of the full shift-invariant theory, then uses published six-loop $O(2)$ results to state the six-loop $\beta$ function and anomalous dimension of both the perfect square theory and the conformally flat limit of quadratic gravity, eqs. (6.27) and (6.28). The equivalence is supported by a Ward identity from the gravitational embedding that enforces $Z_\sigma = Z_1 = Z_2$, equivalently $Z_4 = Z_3^2 = Z_\sigma^{-1}$, protecting the perfect square form under renormalisation.

Load-bearing premise

The all-orders $\beta$-function mapping rests on the exactness of the formal path-integral step that integrates out one field and substitutes $\Omega = e^{\lambda\sigma}$; if quantum corrections or anomalies invalidate that field redefinition, the six-loop prediction fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The six-loop beta function in eq. (6.27) is a concrete prediction for the running of the perfect square coupling, and by the Ward identity the same function applies to the conformally flat limit of quadratic gravity.
  • The Ward identity $Z_\sigma=Z_1=Z_2$ implies the perfect square form is protected under renormalisation, so only one coupling runs on that trajectory, a structure needed for a single-trajectory UV-complete theory.
  • Off-shell infrared finiteness to all orders removes the infrared obstruction at non-exceptional Euclidean momenta, making a KLN-type resummation of on-shell infrared divergences plausible.
  • The exact RG invariance of the cubic interaction when $\lambda_4=0$ means the purely cubic sector is renormalised only through the kinetic term, a much stronger statement than the earlier one-loop observation.
  • Because the $O(2)$ beta function is known to six loops, the perfect square and CFQG beta functions are now known to the same loop order, giving one of the highest-order perturbative predictions available for a quantum-gravity-related theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the formal path-integral map is exact, the perfect square theory inherits every order of the negative-coupling $O(2)$ beta function; a direct four-loop computation would be the next decisive test and is in principle accessible with the same machinery.
  • The relation $\gamma_\sigma = \varepsilon/2 + \beta_\lambda/\lambda$ makes a six-loop anomalous dimension available, which could be used to search for nontrivial fixed points or to constrain lattice studies of the positive-Euclidean perfect square theory.
  • The same Gram-determinant mechanism that tames infrared divergences here may suppress divergences in other shift-symmetric higher-derivative theories, including four-derivative tensor or gravitational models where analogous special RG trajectories might exist.
  • If the CFQG identification is right, the six-loop beta function offers a rare perturbative probe of a quantum-gravity limit: it predicts the running of the effective scale-field coupling over a large range of energies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the renormalisation of the shift-symmetric four-derivative scalar theory with cubic and quartic interactions, eq. (2.3). Using the R* method and a momentum asymptotic expansion, the authors compute the counterterms, beta functions, and anomalous dimension to three loops. They prove a structural theorem constraining the coupling dependence of the renormalisation constants, an all-orders proof of Euclidean IR finiteness for off-shell correlators, and a non-renormalisation result for the purely cubic interaction. For the perfect-square trajectory λ4 = -λ3^2/2, they verify the Ward identity Zσ = Z1 = Z2 to three loops and map the beta function to that of the O(2) φ⁴ theory at negative coupling, eq. (5.7). Using the known six-loop O(2) beta function, they present six-loop predictions for the perfect-square theory and, via the companion paper, for the conformally flat limit of quadratic gravity (CFQG).

Significance. If the all-orders statements hold, the paper provides a substantial extension of Holdom's one-loop results, an exact-looking equivalence between a four-derivative scalar theory (and CFQG) and standard O(2) φ⁴ theory at negative coupling, and the first six-loop beta function for a quadratic-gravity limit. The explicit three-loop counterterms and beta functions are a concrete computational advance, and the internal checks are strong: cancellation of ε-poles, agreement with one-loop results, consistency with the structural theorem, and exact matching to the independent O(2) result at three loops. The all-orders IR-finiteness argument is also a useful structural result. However, the headline six-loop prediction inherits the status of the formal path-integral mapping and the deferred Ward identity, so the significance of the paper is currently conditional on those unproven steps.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, eq. (3.12)] The all-orders beta-function equivalence in eq. (5.7), which is used to convert the six-loop O(2) result into the six-loop perfect-square and CFQG beta functions in eq. (6.27), rests entirely on the formal path-integral identity in eq. (5.4). The Gaussian integration over Υ produces a functional determinant roughly of the form det(Ω^2)^{-1/2}, and the substitution Ω = exp(λσ) involves a nonlinear field-redefinition Jacobian; neither is computed, and the possibility of an anomaly or operator mixing starting at four loops is not addressed. The three-loop verification in Section 6.3.2 is genuine evidence, but it does not control the first unverified order, such as the λ^9 coefficient in eq. (6.27). Please either supply the all-orders argument for the identity, state precisely the regularisation conventions that make the determinant and Jacobian vanish, or present the six-loop coefficients as conjectural rather than as established results.
  2. [Section 5 and Section 6.3.1] The paper states that 'Using diagrammatic methods, we are able to show Z1 = 1 to all orders', but no diagrammatic argument is given in the text. The structural theorem in eqs. (3.9)–(3.11) constrains the form of Z1 but does not by itself imply Z1 = 1, and the claimed all-order non-renormalisation of the cubic interaction directly depends on this statement. Since this is one of the paper's advertised non-renormalisation theorems, the proof should either be included or the claim should be explicitly deferred to a companion paper, with the abstract adjusted accordingly.
  3. [Section 6.3.2, eq. (6.28)] The Ward identity in eq. (5.8), which protects the perfect-square form under renormalisation and underlies the identification between the scalar and gravitational theories, is stated to be proven in the companion paper [3], which is listed as 'In preparation'. This makes the all-orders claims in the present manuscript impossible for a reader to verify independently. I recommend either including the proof of the Ward identity in this paper, or explicitly marking the all-orders statements and the six-loop CFQG prediction as contingent on the companion paper, and adjusting the abstract accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1] Page 3 contains the typo 'Bogloliubov'; it should read 'Bogoliubov'.
  2. [Section 4, after eq. (4.6)] The m = 1 case in the IR-finiteness proof is dismissed in a single sentence. Since eq. (4.6) only establishes IR finiteness for m ≥ 2, the m = 1 subcase should be expanded, as it is needed for a complete all-orders statement.
  3. [Section 6.3.2, eq. (6.28)] The relation γσ = ε/2 + βλ/λ is confusing because βλ contains the tree-level term -ε λ/2, which cancels the ε/2. Please clarify that this identity holds for the loop parts of βλ and γσ, or define the quantities explicitly to match eqs. (2.20)–(2.21).
  4. [Abstract and Section 4] The IR-finiteness theorem is stated for non-exceptional Euclidean kinematics, but the abstract says simply 'Euclidean correlators (or off-shell amplitudes)'. Please make the non-exceptional kinematic qualification explicit in the abstract or in the theorem statement.
  5. [Section 2.2, eqs. (2.16)–(2.17)] The indexing convention for the renormalisation constants Z^{(n3,n4)}_i is introduced in eqs. (2.16)–(2.17), but its relation to the powers appearing in the structural theorem eqs. (3.9)–(3.11) is not spelled out. A short remark explaining the translation between the two conventions would improve readability.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

All-orders Ward identity and CFQG identification rest on unpublished companion paper; 3-loop checks are independent and non-circular.

  1. uniqueness imported from authors [Section 5, around eq. (5.8); relied on again in Section 6.3.1]
    "The diffeomorphism invariance of QG and its conformally flat limit (CFQG) yields a Ward identity which ensures that the only local term allowed in the action is the integral of the four-dimensional Ricci scalar squared. The Ward identity is responsible for protecting the perfect square form of the Lagrangian density under renormalisation. It implies the identities Z3Z1/2 σ = Z 4Zσ = 1."

    The all-orders Ward identity that protects the perfect-square form is attributed to the authors' own companion paper [3], which is unpublished ("In preparation", 2026) and not independently verified. The present paper checks the resulting identities only up to three loops (Section 6.3.1). This all-orders protection is load-bearing: the six-loop beta function in eq. (6.27) is obtained by translating the O(2) beta function through eq. (5.7), and that translation is only the beta function of the perfect-square theory if the perfect-square trajectory is preserved beyond three loops. Thus the all-orders claim rests on a self-citation rather than on an external, machine-checked, or parameter-free result.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 6.3.2, after eq. (6.27)]
    "Moreover, as we show in [3], the one loop results for CFQG agree with the known one loop results for the perfect square and therefore we predict the beta function for CFQG to 6 loops is also given by eq. (6.27)."

    The six-loop beta function of CFQG is not derived in this paper; it is promoted from the PS result using the one-loop CFQG/PS agreement and the gravitational Ward identity, both stated to be shown in the authors' unpublished companion paper [3]. No independent computation of the CFQG beta function at any order appears here. Consequently the headline prediction for CFQG is supported by a self-citation chain. This is not a definitional circularity of the three-loop results, but it is load-bearing self-citation for the central six-loop prediction.

full rationale

The three-loop sector of the paper is self-contained and non-circular: the beta functions (6.13)-(6.14) and the perfect-square beta function (6.17) are obtained by direct diagrammatic R* / asymptotic-expansion computation, and the equivalence with the O(2) phi^4 beta function is checked against the independent six-loop results of Kompaniets and Panzer (ref. [85]). No parameter is fitted to the target; the trajectory lambda4 = -lambda3^2/2 is checked, not imposed. The formal path-integral identity (5.4) is an unproven all-orders assumption, and the six-loop prediction (6.27) is conditional on it, but that is a correctness/rigor gap rather than a circular reduction: the prediction is not equivalent to its input by construction. The circularity that is present is the load-bearing reliance on the authors' own unpublished companion paper [3] for (i) the all-orders Ward identity protecting the perfect-square form (eq. (5.8)) and (ii) the identification of PS theory with CFQG and the one-loop agreement used to promote eq. (6.27) to a CFQG beta function. These self-citations are not machine-checked or externally verified, and the paper itself only checks them to three loops. Hence the score is 4 rather than 0: the central three-loop derivation has independent content, but the all-orders and CFQG claims are supported by a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest primarily on the Lagrangian structure, the R* computational framework, the IR factorisation, the path integral mapping to O(2), and the unpublished companion Ward identity. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The marginal shift-invariant interactions are exactly the cubic and quartic operators in eq. (2.3).
    Classification from Safari et al. [22]; the paper relies on this to set the interaction basis.
  • standard math Dimensional regularisation with MS scheme yields the renormalisation constants and beta functions as computed.
    Standard QFT background; not proven in the paper.
  • domain assumption The IR factorisation in eq. (4.1) and the motic/m.m. classification from Refs. [33,56] apply to this four-derivative theory.
    Used in the IR finiteness proof in Section 4.
  • ad hoc to paper The path integral reduction in eq. (5.4), integrating out Upsilon in the O(1,1) model with field redefinition Omega=exp(lambda sigma), gives the perfect square theory with a local measure.
    This formal manipulation is the basis of the beta function equivalence; not proven beyond the formal level.
  • ad hoc to paper The Ward identity (5.8) from diffeomorphism invariance of CFQG holds to all orders and transfers to the scalar perfect square theory.
    Attributed to companion paper [3] (in preparation); verified here only to three loops.
  • standard math The six-loop beta function of O(2) phi^4 from Kompaniets and Panzer [85] is correct.
    External published result used to predict the PS/CFQG beta function to six loops.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On divergences in a four-derivative scalar field theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YCVPJPYC

@misc{pith2026260812210,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On divergences in a four-derivative scalar field theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YCVPJPYC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12210}
}
abstract

We perform a detailed diagrammatic analysis of the renormalisation of a family of asymptotically free, shift-symmetric four-derivative scalar field theories introduced by Holdom in arXiv:2303.06723 and arXiv:2402.09223. We extend the renormalisation of the theory from one to three loops using both an $R^*$ method and an asymptotic expansion in momenta. We prove that the Euclidean correlators (or off-shell amplitudes) are IR finite, to all orders in perturbation theory, and derive a non-renormalisation theorem describing the all-order structure of the renormalisation constants. In particular, a purely cubic interaction is RG invariant and a perfect square Lagrangian density is preserved under renormalisation. The latter result is due to a Ward identity in a related $\textit{ gravitational}$ theory $-$ the conformally flat limit of quadratic gravity (CFQG). We show that the beta function for the perfect square theory maps exactly to that of an $O(2)$-symmetric, two-derivative, massless $\phi^4$ theory at negative coupling. We verify this relationship explicitly up to three loops and thus determine the beta function and anomalous dimension for both the perfect square theory and CFQG to six loops.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    Anderson, S

    M. Anderson, S. Bateman, F. Herzog and N. Turok,The conformally flat limit of Quadratic Gravity,In preparation(2026)

    2026

  2. [1]

    Holdom,Running couplings and unitarity in a 4-derivative scalar field theory,Phys

    B. Holdom,Running couplings and unitarity in a 4-derivative scalar field theory,Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 138023 [2303.06723]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [2]

    Holdom,UV-complete 4-derivative scalar field theory,Nucl

    B. Holdom,UV-complete 4-derivative scalar field theory,Nucl. Phys. B1000(2024) 116472 [2402.09223]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Coleman and D

    S. Coleman and D. J. Gross,Price of asymptotic freedom,Phys. Rev. Lett.31(1973) 851

    1973

  5. [5]

    Ostrogradsky,Mémoires sur les équations différentielles, relatives au problème des isopérimètres,Mem

    M. Ostrogradsky,Mémoires sur les équations différentielles, relatives au problème des isopérimètres,Mem. Acad. St. Petersbourg6(1850) 385

  6. [6]

    R. P. Woodard,Ostrogradsky’s theorem on Hamiltonian instability,Scholarpedia10(2015) 32243 [1506.02210]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    K. S. Stelle,Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 953

    1977

  8. [8]

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,Renormalizable asymptotically free quantum theory of gravity,Nucl. Phys. B201(1982) 469

    1982

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    I. G. Avramidi and A. O. Barvinsky,Asymptotic freedom in higher derivative quantum gravity,Phys. Lett. B159(1985) 269

    1985

  2. [10]

    R. J. Riegert,A Nonlocal Action for the Trace Anomaly,Phys. Lett. B134(1984) 56

    1984

  3. [11]

    Antoniadis and E

    I. Antoniadis and E. Mottola,4-D quantum gravity in the conformal sector,Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 2013

    1992

  4. [12]

    Boyle and N

    L. Boyle and N. Turok,Cancelling the vacuum energy and Weyl anomaly in the standard model with dimension-zero scalar fields,2110.06258

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Turok and L

    N. Turok and L. Boyle,A Minimal Explanation of the Primordial Cosmological Perturbations,2302.00344

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Boyle, N

    L. Boyle, N. Turok and V. Vaibhav,Fixed points of classical gravity coupled with a Standard-Model-like theory,2509.09346

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,Renormalizable Asymptotically Free Quantum Theory of Gravity,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 377

    1981

  8. [16]

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,Conformal supergravity,Phys. Rept.119(1985) 233

    1985

  9. [17]

    A. A. Tseytlin,On divergences in non-minimalN= 4conformal supergravity,J. Phys. A50 (2017) 48LT01 [1708.08727]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Adamo, S

    T. Adamo, S. Nakach and A. A. Tseytlin,Scattering of conformal higher spin fields,JHEP 07(2018) 016 [1805.00394]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Nakach,Conformal Higher Spins and Scattering Amplitudes, Ph.D

    S. Nakach,Conformal Higher Spins and Scattering Amplitudes, Ph.D. thesis, Imperial Coll., London, 2018. 10.25560/66029. – 23 –

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    A. A. Tseytlin,Comments on a 4-derivative scalar theory in 4 dimensions,Theor. Math. Phys.217(2023) 1969 [2212.10599]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bateman and N

    S. Bateman and N. Turok,Escape from Ostrogradsky via Hidden Ghost Parity,2607.00096

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Safari, A

    M. Safari, A. Stergiou, G. P. Vacca and O. Zanusso,Scale and conformal invariance in higher derivative shift symmetric theories,JHEP02(2022) 034 [2112.01084]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Symanzik,A field theory with computable large-momenta behavior,Lett

    K. Symanzik,A field theory with computable large-momenta behavior,Lett. Nuovo Cim.6S2 (1973) 77

    1973

  16. [24]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Infrared R operation and ultraviolet counterterms in the ms scheme,Phys. Lett. B114(1982) 340

    1982

  17. [25]

    A. A. Vladimirov,Method for computing renormalization group functions in dimensional renormalization scheme,Theor. Math. Phys.43(1980) 417

    1980

  18. [26]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and V. A. Smirnov,R* operation corrected,Phys. Lett. B144(1984) 419

    1984

  19. [27]

    V. A. Smirnov and K. G. Chetyrkin,R∗ operation in the Minimal Subtraction Scheme, Theor. Math. Phys.63(1985) 462

    1985

  20. [28]

    Larin and P

    S. Larin and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,The Infrared R* operation,hep-th/0212315

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kleinert and V

    H. Kleinert and V. Schulte-Frohlinde,Critical Properties ofϕ4-Theories. World Scientific Publishing, 2001, 10.1142/4733

    2001 doi

  22. [30]

    K. G. Chetyrkin,Combinatorics ofR-,R −1-, andR ∗-operations and asymptotic expansions of feynman integrals in the limit of large momenta and masses,1701.08627

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Herzog and B

    F. Herzog and B. Ruijl,The R∗-operation for Feynman graphs with generic numerators, JHEP05(2017) 037 [1703.03776]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    de Vries, G

    J. de Vries, G. Falcioni, F. Herzog and B. Ruijl,Two- and three-loop anomalous dimensions of Weinberg’s dimension-six CP-odd gluonic operator,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 016010 [1907.04923]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Beekveldt, M

    R. Beekveldt, M. Borinsky and F. Herzog,The Hopf algebra structure of the R∗-operation, JHEP07(2020) 061 [2003.04301]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Henriksson, F

    J. Henriksson, F. Herzog, S. R. Kousvos and J. Roosmale Nepveu,Multi-loop spectra in general scalar EFTs and CFTs,2507.12518

  27. [35]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark-quark case,Phys. Lett. B842(2023) 137944 [2302.07593]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The gluon-to-quark case,Phys. Lett. B846(2023) 138215 [2307.04158]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – the gluon-gluon case –,Phys. Lett. B860(2025) 139194 [2410.08089]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch and S. Van Thurenhout,Constraints for twist-two alien operators in QCD,JHEP11(2024) 080 [2409.02870]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark-to-gluon case,Phys. Lett. B856(2024) 138906 [2404.09701]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    H. J. Bhabha,On a New Theory of Nuclear Forces,Phys. Rev.77(1950) 665. – 24 –

    1950

  33. [41]

    Heisenberg,Lee model and quantisation of non linear field equations,Nuclear Physics4 (1957) 532

    W. Heisenberg,Lee model and quantisation of non linear field equations,Nuclear Physics4 (1957) 532

    1957

  34. [42]

    C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim,No-ghost theorem for the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator model,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 110402 [0706.0207]

    2008 arXiv

  35. [43]

    C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim,Exactly solvable PT-symmetric Hamiltonian having no Hermitian counterpart,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 025022 [0804.4190]

    2008 arXiv

  36. [44]

    J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes,On quadratic gravity,Nuovo Cim. C45(2022) 26 [2112.01974]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes,Ostrogradsky instability can be overcome by quantum physics,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 045010 [2105.00898]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes,Causality and gravity,JHEP11(2021) 010 [2106.05912]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Holdom and J

    B. Holdom and J. Ren,QCD analogy for quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 124030 [1512.05305]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Holdom,Ultra-Planckian scattering from a QFT for gravity,Phys

    B. Holdom,Ultra-Planckian scattering from a QFT for gravity,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 046008 [2107.01727]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Nicolis, R

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini,The Galileon as a local modification of gravity, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 064036 [0811.2197]

    2009 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Kampf and J

    K. Kampf and J. Novotny,Unification of Galileon Dualities,JHEP10(2014) 006 [1403.6813]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    M. A. Luty, M. Porrati and R. Rattazzi,Strong interactions and stability in the DGP model, JHEP09(2003) 029 [hep-th/0303116]

    2003 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Hinterbichler and A

    K. Hinterbichler and A. Joyce,Hidden symmetry of the Galileon,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 023503 [1501.07600]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    G. Goon, K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and M. Trodden,Aspects of galileon non-renormalization,Journal of High Energy Physics2016(2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    Cheung, K

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny and J. Trnka,Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 221602 [1412.4095]

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Cheung, K

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C.-H. Shen and J. Trnka,On-Shell Recursion Relations for Effective Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 041601 [1509.03309]

    2016 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Brown,Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group,Commun

    F. Brown,Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.11(2017) 453 [1512.06409]

    2017 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Maplesoft, a division of Waterloo Maple Inc.., “Maple.”

  50. [58]

    Kuipers, T

    J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren and J. Vollinga,FORM version 4.0,Comput. Phys. Commun.184(2013) 1453 [1203.6543]

    2013 arXiv

  51. [59]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren,New features of FORM,math-ph/0010025

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Ruijl, T

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. Vermaseren,FORM version 4.2,1707.06453

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Ruijl, T

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. A. M. Vermaseren,Forcer, a FORM program for the parametric reduction of four-loop massless propagator diagrams,Comput. Phys. Commun.253(2020) 107198 [1704.06650]. – 25 –

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Goode, F

    J. Goode, F. Herzog and S. Teale,OPITeR: A program for tensor reduction of multi-loop Feynman integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.312(2025) 109606 [2411.02233]

    2025 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation,J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation,J. Comput. Phys.105(1993) 279

    1993

  56. [64]

    Chakraborty,The Asymptotic Hopf Algebra of Feynman Integrals, master’s thesis, Indian Institute of Science, 2023

    M. Chakraborty,The Asymptotic Hopf Algebra of Feynman Integrals, master’s thesis, Indian Institute of Science, 2023

    2023

  57. [65]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, F. V. Tkachov and S. G. Gorishnii,Operator product expansion in the minimal subtraction scheme,Phys. Lett. B119(1982) 407

    1982

  58. [66]

    K. G. Chetyrkin,Infrared R∗- operation and operator product expansion in the minimal subtraction scheme,Phys. Lett. B126(1983) 371

    1983

  59. [67]

    S. G. Gorishnii, S. A. Larin and F. V. Tkachov,The algorithm for OPE coefficient functions in the MS scheme,Phys. Lett. B124(1983) 217

    1983

  60. [68]

    S. G. Gorishnii and S. A. Larin,Coefficient functions of asymptotic operator expansions in minimal subtraction scheme,Nucl. Phys. B283(1987) 452

    1987

  61. [69]

    K. G. Chetyrkin,Operator expansions in the minimal subtraction scheme.1: The gluing method,Theor. Math. Phys.75(1988) 346

    1988

  62. [70]

    K. G. Chetyrkin,Operator expansions in the minimal subtraction scheme.2: Explicit formulas for coefficient functions,Theor. Math. Phys.76(1988) 809

    1988

  63. [71]

    C. H. Llewellyn Smith and J. P. de Vries,The operator product expansion for minimally subtracted operators,Nucl. Phys. B296(1988) 991

    1988

  64. [72]

    S. G. Gorishnii,Construction of operator expansions and effective theories in the MS scheme, Nucl. Phys. B319(1989) 633

    1989

  65. [73]

    V. A. Smirnov,Asymptotic expansions in limits of large momenta and masses,Commun. Math. Phys.134(1990) 109

    1990

  66. [74]

    V. A. Smirnov,Asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses and calculation of Feynman diagrams,Mod. Phys. Lett. A10(1995) 1485 [hep-th/9412063]

    1995 arXiv

  67. [75]

    V. A. Smirnov,Applied asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses,Springer Tracts Mod. Phys.177(2002) 1

    2002

  68. [76]

    Chakraborty and F

    M. Chakraborty and F. Herzog,The asymptotic Hopf algebra of Feynman integrals,JHEP 01(2025) 006 [2408.14304]

    2025 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Van Thurenhout, G

    S. Van Thurenhout, G. Falcioni, F. Herzog and S.-O. Moch,Alien operators for PDF evolution,PoSEPS-HEP2025(2026) 465 [2509.01994]

    2026 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Boito, M

    D. Boito, M. Jamin and R. Miravitllas,Scheme Variations of the QCD Coupling and HadronicτDecays,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 152001 [1606.06175]

    2016 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Davies and A

    J. Davies and A. Vogt,Absence ofπ2 terms in physical anomalous dimensions in DIS: Verification and resulting predictions,Phys. Lett. B776(2018) 189 [1711.05267]

    2018 arXiv

  72. [80]

    P. A. Baikov and K. G. Chetyrkin,The structure of generic anomalous dimensions and no-π theorem for massless propagators,JHEP06(2018) 141 [1804.10088]

    2018 arXiv

  73. [81]

    L. F. Abbott,Introduction to the Background Field Method,Acta Phys. Polon. B13(1982) 33

    1982

  74. [82]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, A. L. Kataev and F. V. Tkachov,Five Loop Calculations in thegϕ4 Model and the Critical Indexη,Phys. Lett. B99(1981) 147. – 26 –

    1981

  75. [83]

    S. G. Gorishnii, S. A. Larin, F. V. Tkachov and K. G. Chetyrkin,Five Loop Renormalization Group Calculations in thegϕ4 in Four-dimensions Theory,Phys. Lett. B132(1983) 351

    1983

  76. [84]

    D. I. Kazakov,The method of uniqueness, a new powerful technique for multiloop calculations,Phys. Lett. B133(1983) 406

    1983

  77. [85]

    M. V. Kompaniets and E. Panzer,Minimally subtracted six loop renormalization of O(n)-symmetricϕ 4 theory and critical exponents,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 036016 [1705.06483]

    2017 arXiv

  78. [86]

    D. V. Batkovich, K. G. Chetyrkin and M. V. Kompaniets,Six loop analytical calculation of the field anomalous dimension and the critical exponentηinO(n)-symmetricφ 4 model, Nucl. Phys. B906(2016) 147 [1601.01960]

    2016 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Schnetz,ϕ4 theory at seven loops,Phys

    O. Schnetz,ϕ4 theory at seven loops,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 036002 [2212.03663]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Schnetz,Numbers and Functions in Quantum Field Theory,Phys

    O. Schnetz,Numbers and Functions in Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 085018 [1606.08598]

    2018 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Jackiw and S

    R. Jackiw and S. Templeton,How Superrenormalizable Interactions Cure their Infrared Divergences,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2291

    1981

  82. [90]

    Kinoshita,Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes,J

    T. Kinoshita,Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes,J. Math. Phys.3(1962) 650

    1962

  83. [91]

    T. D. Lee and M. Nauenberg,Degenerate systems and mass singularities,Phys. Rev.133 (1964) B1549

    1964

  84. [92]

    E. C. Poggio and H. R. Quinn,The Infrared Behavior of Zero-Mass Green’s Functions and the Absence of Quark Confinement in Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 578

    1976

  85. [93]

    G. F. Sterman,Kinoshita’s Theorem in Yang-Mills Theories,Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 2123

    1976

  86. [94]

    C. Frye, H. Hannesdottir, N. Paul, M. D. Schwartz and K. Yan,Infrared Finiteness and Forward Scattering,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 056015 [1810.10022]

    2019 arXiv

  87. [95]

    G. F. Sterman,An Introduction to quantum field theory. Cambridge University Press, 8, 1993

    1993

  88. [96]

    Bateman and N

    S. Bateman and N. Turok,Unitarity and positivity in higher-derivative QFTs with hidden ghost parity,In preparation(2026) . – 27 –

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.