Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 93 references

Constraints on the $O(n)$ model from a negative number of flavors

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that continuing the number of flavors to negative even values forces degeneracies in the O(n) operator spectrum and yields a closed two-loop formula for the anomalous dimensions of all phi^k operators.

desk verdict New closed-form two-loop anomalous dimensions for all phi^k operators via O(n)-Sp(n) duality; real and useful, with one cited-but-unproved pole-structure claim that should be checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12481 v1 pith:ULBPSEUG submitted 2026-08-12 hep-th hep-ph

Daniele Artico , Jasper Roosmale Nepveu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords O(n)modelnegativenumberofflavorsspectrumconstraintsSp(n)dualityanomalousdimensionsphi^koperatorsnon-renormalizationepsilonexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper treats the number of flavors $n$ in the $O(n)$ model as a continuous variable and shows that representation-theoretic degeneracies at special negative values of $n$ impose real constraints on the operator spectrum. The authors extend earlier spectrum constraints to negative even $n$ through the $O(2N)\leftrightarrow Sp(2N)$ duality, which exchanges symmetrization and antisymmetrization of indices. In perturbation theory these constraints imply that, up to two loops, the renormalization of any pure $\phi^k$ operator is governed by exactly two tensor structures. That reduces the two-loop anomalous dimension of every $\phi^k$-type operator in every traceless symmetric representation to one closed formula, fixed by two previously known calculations. If correct, this predicts an infinite family of scaling dimensions without additional loop diagrams and explains factors of $(n\pm a)$ in renormalization-group mixing matrices that become non-renormalization theorems.

What carries the argument

The engine is the decomposition of reducible flavor tensors into $O(n)$ irreps, organized by Young tableaux and trace subtraction. The load-bearing identity is the dimension/character relation $d_\lambda(n)=(-1)^m d_{\lambda^{\mathsf T}}(-n)$, which encodes the $O(2N)\leftrightarrow Sp(2N)$ duality: when a continued character becomes the negative of another at some integer $n$, the two evanescent states must have equal scaling dimensions. On the perturbative side, the key simplification is that up to two loops the renormalization-group equation for a general $\phi^k$ tensor contains only two structures, $f_1$ and $f_2$; the sole four-index-contracted two-loop diagram factorizes and carries no $1/\varepsilon$ pole in the minimal-subtraction scheme, and mixing with derivative operators is absent at this order. This collapses an infinite family of anomalous dimensions to two unknown functions, which are then fixed by known one- and two-loop inputs.

What would settle it

Compute the two-loop $1/\varepsilon$ pole of the factorized diagram (4.5) for $k=6$ in the minimal-subtraction scheme; a nonzero pole would directly invalidate the claim that only $f_1$ and $f_2$ contribute. Alternatively, an independent two-loop computation of $\Delta_{\phi^6,T_4}$ from standard graphs would expose any missing $O(\lambda^2)$ piece.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a closed two-loop formula for the scaling dimension of any operator of the form $O_{\phi^k,T_m}=(t\cdot\phi)^m\phi^{a_1}\cdots\phi^{a_m}(\phi\cdot\phi)^{(k-m)/2}$ in the $m$-index traceless symmetric representation of $O(n)$: $$\Delta_{\phi^k,T_m}=k(1-\varepsilon/2)+f_1(\$\lambda$,k,n)+\tfrac12(k-m)(n+k+m-2)f_2(\$\lambda$,k,n)+O(\$lambda^{3}$),$$ with $$f_1(\$\lambda$,k,n)=\frac{k(k-1)}3\$\lambda$-\frac{k(2+$8k^{2}$+2k(n-6)-3n)}{36}\$lambda^{2}$+O(\$lambda^{3}$),\qquad f_2(\$\lambda$,k,n)=\frac{\$\lambda$}{3}-\left(\frac{k}{2}-\frac79\right)\$lambda^{2}$+O(\$lambda^{3}$).$$ The derivation rests on showing that only the two tensor structures multiplying $f_1$ and $f_2$ can appear in the renormalization-group equation up to two loops, after which the two functions are determined from existing one-loop and two-loop results rather than new calculations. The same degeneracies, continued to negative even $n$ through $O(2N)\leftrightarrow Sp(2N)$ duality, give explicit spectrum constraints such as $\Delta_{\phi^6,S}=\Delta_{\phi^6,T_4}$ at $n=-2$ and, in general, $\Delta_{\phi^k,T_{m'}}=\Delta_{\phi^k,T_m}$ whenever $n=2-m-m'$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that up to two loops the renormalization of any pure $\phi^k$ operator is captured entirely by two index-contraction patterns, meaning no mixing with derivative operators and no $1/\varepsilon$ pole in the factorized four-index-contracted diagram, so that the two functions $f_1$ and $f_2$ suffice.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every $\phi^k$-type operator in any traceless symmetric representation of $O(n)$ receives a closed two-loop scaling dimension from Eqs. (4.7)--(4.10), so the whole infinite family is determined without new diagram computations.
  • At negative even $n$, spectrum constraints force degeneracies such as $\Delta_{\phi^6,S}=\Delta_{\phi^6,T_4}$ at $n=-2$ and $\Delta_{\phi^6,T}=\Delta_{\phi^6,T_6}$ at $n=-6$, and generally $\Delta_{\phi^k,T_m}=\Delta_{\phi^k,T_{m'}}$ when $n=2-m-m'$.
  • In a natural operator basis, singlet-sector mixing matrices acquire overall factors of $(n-a)$ and $(n+a)$; where such factors cannot be generated by one- or two-loop diagrams, the corresponding mixing entries vanish, yielding non-renormalization results at dimension six, eight, and ten.
  • At $n=-2$, the quartic interaction vanishes and the model is free; the associated $(n+2)$ factors in diagonal entries explain why some anomalous dimensions vanish there while evanescent operators can remain nontrivial.
  • The same annihilation constraints extend to operator product expansion coefficients, with the singlet and traceless-symmetric $\phi^2$ OPE coefficients agreeing at $n=0$ in the known $\varepsilon$-expansion data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-input bootstrap could in principle be pushed to three loops once the third tensor structure and the mixing of $\phi^k$ with derivative operators are computed for a single representative $k$; the paper identifies these as the missing ingredients.
  • Because all observed negative-$n$ degeneracies occur at even integers, odd negative values would require a supergroup extension such as $OSp$ models; the paper leaves this open, but the same annihilation logic would predict analogous constraints there.
  • A dedicated three-loop check of one nontrivial pair, for instance $\Delta_{\phi^6,S}$ versus $\Delta_{\phi^6,T_4}$ at $n=-2$, would test whether the spectrum constraints survive operator mixing; the paper expects all-loop validity but does not prove it.
  • The analogy with spacetime evanescence suggests that similar bootstrap relations could be obtained by treating the spacetime dimension $d$ as variable; the paper's large-$n$ example shows scalar and spin-two operators agreeing at $d=0$ through first order, hinting at a broader structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper treats the number of flavors n in the O(n) model as a continuous variable and derives constraints on the operator spectrum when n is continued to negative even integers. The authors extend the quantum-evanescence spectrum constraints of Ref. [25] to negative even n using the O(n)/Sp(-n) duality, and complement this with an all-orders perturbative derivation in which the anomalous-dimension tensors are decomposed into the available O(n) tensor structures. The central new result is the two-loop master formula, Eqs. (4.7)-(4.10), giving the scaling dimension of any phi^k-type operator in an m-index traceless symmetric representation in terms of two functions f1 and f2 fixed from the known m=k and m=0 results. The paper also derives constraints on renormalization-group mixing matrices, predicts non-renormalization zeros in specific operator bases, and sketches extensions to OPE coefficients and to evanescence in the number of spacetime dimensions.

Significance. The master formula, if correct, is a valuable and nontrivial result: it extends two-loop anomalous dimensions to the entire family of phi^k operators without new diagrammatic computations, and it organizes infinite families of spectrum degeneracies at negative integer n. The perturbative re-derivation of the spectrum constraints in Sec. 3.3 is explicit and agrees with the five-loop and two-loop data shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The non-renormalization statements in Sec. 5, such as the one-loop zeros in Eq. (5.6), are concrete and testable. The main caveat is that the master formula rests on an unproved pole-structure assertion for diagram (4.5), so the result should be accompanied by a proof or an independent check before the formula can be fully accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.2)-(4.7) and footnote 12] The entire two-loop master formula rests on the assertion that diagram (4.5), the only two-loop topology that contracts four indices of c_{phi^k}, has no 1/epsilon pole in the MS scheme and therefore does not generate an f3 tensor structure. This is cited to Ref. [82, Sec.5] but is not re-derived, and footnote 12 explicitly notes that the argument can fail when vertices carry momenta. Since f1 and f2 are subsequently fixed without using any intermediate-m two-loop datum, an unaccounted 1/epsilon pole would invalidate Eq. (4.7) for all 0<m<k. I request either a self-contained derivation of the pole structure for the phi^k vertex with generic k, or an explicit two-loop check of the final formula against the data of Refs. [43,44] for at least one intermediate representation.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.7)-(4.10)] The determination of f1 and f2 uses only the m=k and m=0 scaling dimensions, so agreement with those endpoints is automatic, and the spectrum constraints (4.8) follow from the algebraic form of (4.7) for any f1 and f2. The paper therefore provides no non-tautological check that the f2 extracted from the m=0 result also reproduces the two-loop dimensions of intermediate representations. I recommend adding a direct comparison with the two-loop results of Refs. [43,44] for a case such as k=6,m=2 or k=8,m=2, which would also provide an indirect check of the no-pole assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.6)] The displayed operator O_{phi^k,T_m} contains both (t.phi)^m and phi^{a1}...phi^{am}, which would give k+m fields rather than k; it should read O_{phi^k,T_m} = c_{phi^k,T_m} (t.phi)^m (phi.phi)^{(k-m)/2}, or an equivalent expression with traceless tensors. The subsequent formulas are consistent with the corrected form.
  2. [Sec. 6.1, Eq. (6.2)] The symbols f1 and f2 are reused for OPE coefficients after being used for the renormalization-group functions in Eq. (4.2); please use different notation, such as g1 and g2, to avoid confusion.
  3. [Eq. (5.4)] The two operators denoted c^{(S)}_{phi4□2,1} and c^{(S)}_{phi4□2,2} are not defined; please specify their tensor structures or the S4 Young diagrams to which they correspond.
  4. [Figs. 1 and 2 captions] The black dots in Fig. 1 are described as non-perturbatively constrained, but the plotted curves are perturbative results; please clarify that the constraints are exact statements satisfied order by order by these perturbative curves.
  5. [Eq. (4.10)] Since the extraction of f2 from the known two-loop m=0 result is a central step, please show the derivation explicitly rather than presenting the result without intermediate algebra.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the two-loop phi^k formula is anchored by external m=k and m=0 results; intermediate representations are genuine predictions of the two-structure ansatz.

full rationale

The derivation chain in Sec. 4 is self-contained and not circular. The RG ansatz in Eq. (4.2) retains only the f1 and f2 tensor structures up to two loops; Eq. (4.7) then expresses the scaling dimension of every traceless symmetric phi^k operator in terms of these two functions and known combinatorial coefficients. The functions are fixed from external results: f1 is determined by the known six-loop dimension of the maximally traceless symmetric operator (m=k, Ref. [84]), and f2 is determined by the known two-loop singlet dimension (m=0, Refs. [29,85]). The claimed new results are the intermediate m values, which are not used anywhere to fix f1 or f2. No equation in Sec. 4 is solved using its own output. The spectrum constraint Eq. (4.8) is presented as a consequence of Eq. (4.7), not as an input used to determine the two functions. The self-references to Refs. [43,44,67] appear only in validation plots, explicit mixing-matrix checks, and consistency comparisons; they are not load-bearing inputs to the bootstrap. The load-bearing assumption that the four-index factorized diagram (4.5) has no 1/epsilon pole in the MS scheme is cited to Ref. [82] and is a correctness risk rather than a circularity, because it is an external cited result and not an input that is renamed as the output.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on two structural inputs: analytic continuation of the theory in n, and the two-loop topology argument that limits the tensor structures in the phi^k RG equation. The continuation is standard in the O(n) literature and inherited from Ref. [25]. The topology argument is the most fragile input: it cites a known result (Ref. [82]) and a non-mixing theorem (Ref. [81]) rather than proving them here. All perturbative inputs are taken from the literature; no new free parameters are fitted to the target predictions.

free parameters (2)
  • f1(lambda,k,n) = Eq. (4.10)
    Unknown function in the RG ansatz (4.2), fixed by the known six-loop result for the maximally traceless-symmetric phi^k operator (Ref. [84]) and the known one-loop result for all m; not fitted to the predicted operators.
  • f2(lambda,k) = Eq. (4.10)
    Unknown function in the RG ansatz (4.2), fixed by the known two-loop singlet phi^k result (Refs. [29,85]) together with f1; n-independent at one and two loops.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard representation theory of O(n), Sp(n) and S_m: characters, Littlewood-Richardson coefficients, Schur-Weyl duality, hook formulas.
    Used throughout Secs. 2 and 3, e.g., Eqs. (2.15)-(2.17) and Table 1; taken as background.
  • domain assumption Anomalous dimensions are continuous, and at each perturbative order polynomial, functions of the number of flavors n, so the theory can be continued to non-integer and negative n.
    Stated in Sec. 2.2 around Eq. (2.12) and used throughout; the spectrum-constraint argument equates quantities at n = bar n by taking limits, e.g., Eqs. (2.13)-(2.14).
  • domain assumption The O(2N) model at negative N is equivalent to the Sp(2N) model with anticommuting scalars, including for composite operators and their renormalization.
    Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (3.1)-(3.10); the map is justified by a Feynman-diagram sign argument and checked at four loops for dimension-six operators only in footnote 9.
  • ad hoc to paper For phi^k operators without derivatives, only diagrams that contract at most two indices of c_{phi^k} contribute to the anomalous dimension up to two loops; the four-index-contraction diagram (4.5) has no 1/epsilon pole in MS and derivative-operator mixing is absent.
    Sec. 4, the topology argument between Eqs. (4.3) and (4.5); this is the load-bearing structural premise of the headline two-loop formula, relying on Refs. [81,82].
  • domain assumption The existing perturbative results used as input (one-loop general result [29,83], six-loop maximally symmetric result [84], two-loop singlet result [29,85]) are correct and use compatible conventions and operator normalizations.
    Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.9)-(4.10); the paper does not re-derive these results and the final formula inherits their conventions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraints on the $O(n)$ model from a negative number of flavors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ULBPSEUG

@misc{pith2026260812481,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraints on the $O(n)$ model from a negative number of flavors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ULBPSEUG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12481}
}
abstract

Treating the number of flavors $n$ as a variable in the $O(n)$ model leads to non-perturbative constraints on the spectrum of operators. Using the duality between $O(n)$ and $Sp(-n)$, we extend these relations to negative even values of $n$ and we make them explicit by decomposing operators with general flavor structure into irreducible representations. In perturbation theory, we exploit this structure to reveal novel degeneracies in the scaling dimensions of different operators, which persist for arbitrary $n$. This allows us to derive the two-loop anomalous dimension of any $\phi^k$-type operator from existing results without additional loop calculations. The same mechanism dictates patterns in renormalization group mixing matrices, yielding new non-renormalization results in a specific operator basis. We comment on extending this framework to relations between operator product expansion coefficients and to analogous constraints arising from evanescence under continuation in the number of spacetime dimensions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    W. Cao, X. Lu and T. Melia,Constraints on the spectrum of field theories with non-integer O(N)symmetry from quantum evanescence,SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 055 [2312.10139]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Bollini and J.J

    C.G. Bollini and J.J. Giambiagi,Dimensional renormalization: the number of dimensions as a regularizing parameter,Nuovo Cim.B12(1972) 20

    1972

  3. [2]

    ’t Hooft and M.J.G

    G. ’t Hooft and M.J.G. Veltman,Regularization and renormalization of gauge fields,Nucl. Phys.B44(1972) 189

    1972

  4. [3]

    Wilson,Renormalization group and critical phenomena

    K.G. Wilson,Renormalization group and critical phenomena. 1. Renormalization group and the Kadanoff scaling picture,Phys. Rev. B4(1971) 3174

    1971

  5. [4]

    Wilson,Renormalization group and critical phenomena

    K.G. Wilson,Renormalization group and critical phenomena. 2. Phase space cell analysis of critical behavior,Phys. Rev. B4(1971) 3184

    1971

  6. [5]

    Wilson and J.B

    K.G. Wilson and J.B. Kogut,The Renormalization group and the epsilon expansion,Phys. Rept.12(1974) 75

    1974

  7. [6]

    Collins,Renormalization: an introduction to renormalization, the renormalization group and the operator-product expansion, vol

    J.C. Collins,Renormalization: an introduction to renormalization, the renormalization group and the operator-product expansion, vol. 26 ofCambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984), 10.1017/9781009401807

    doi:10.1017/9781009401807 1984

  8. [7]

    Hogervorst, S

    M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov and B.C. van Rees,Truncated conformal space approach in d dimensions: A cheap alternative to lattice field theory?,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 025005 [1409.1581]

    arXiv 2015

Show all 93 references
  1. [8]

    Hogervorst, S

    M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov and B.C. van Rees,Unitarity violation at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in4−ϵdimensions,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 125025 [1512.00013]

    2016 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Q. Jin, K. Ren, G. Yang and R. Yu,Gluonic evanescent operators: negative-norm states and complex anomalous dimensions,JHEP09(2024) 151 [2312.08445]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Cappelli, L

    A. Cappelli, L. Maffi and S. Okuda,Critical Ising model in varying dimension by conformal bootstrap,JHEP01(2019) 161 [1811.07751]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Zan,On the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in the limit of integer spacetime dimensions, 2601.19977

    B. Zan,On the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in the limit of integer spacetime dimensions, 2601.19977

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Delmastro, Y.-Y

    D. Delmastro, Y.-Y. Li and D. Rathore,Does QFT make sense in non-integer dimensions?, 2607.05338

    arXiv

  6. [13]

    Morris and M.D

    T.R. Morris and M.D. Turner,Derivative expansion of the renormalization group in O(N) scalar field theory,Nucl. Phys. B509(1998) 637 [hep-th/9704202]

    1998 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Cardy,Logarithmic correlations in quenched random magnets and polymers, cond-mat/9911024

    J.L. Cardy,Logarithmic correlations in quenched random magnets and polymers, cond-mat/9911024

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Q.-Q. Liu, Y. Deng, T.M. Garoni and H.W.J. Blote,The O(n) loop model on a three-dimensional lattice,Nucl. Phys. B859(2012) 107 [1112.5647]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Cardy,Logarithmic conformal field theories as limits of ordinary CFTs and some physical applications,J

    J. Cardy,Logarithmic conformal field theories as limits of ordinary CFTs and some physical applications,J. Phys. A46(2013) 494001 [1302.4279]. – 29 –

    2013 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Shimada and S

    H. Shimada and S. Hikami,Fractal dimensions of self-avoiding walks and Ising high-temperature graphs in 3D conformal bootstrap,J. Statist. Phys.165(2016) 1006 [1509.04039]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Binder and S

    D.J. Binder and S. Rychkov,Deligne categories in lattice models and quantum field theory, or making sense ofO(N)symmetry with non-integerN,JHEP04(2020) 117 [1911.07895]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Chlebicki and P

    A. Chlebicki and P. Jakubczyk,Analyticity of critical exponents of theO(N)models from nonperturbative renormalization,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 134 [2012.00782]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Gorbenko and B

    V. Gorbenko and B. Zan,Two-dimensional O(n) models and logarithmic CFTs,JHEP10 (2020) 099 [2005.07708]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Grans-Samuelsson, R

    L. Grans-Samuelsson, R. Nivesvivat, J.L. Jacobsen, S. Ribault and H. Saleur,Global symmetry and conformal bootstrap in the two-dimensionalO(n)model,SciPost Phys.12 (2022) 147 [2111.01106]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Sirois,Navigating through the O(N) archipelago,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 081 [2203.11597]

    B. Sirois,Navigating through the O(N) archipelago,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 081 [2203.11597]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Jacobsen, S

    J.L. Jacobsen, S. Ribault and H. Saleur,Spaces of states of the two-dimensionalO(n)and Potts models,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 092 [2208.14298]

    2023

  17. [24]

    Nekrasov,Analytic continuation and supersymmetry.,Proc

    N. Nekrasov,Analytic continuation and supersymmetry.,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.107(2024) 167 [2310.01654]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Caputa and R

    P. Caputa and R. de Mello Koch,Gauge invariants at arbitrary N and trace relations,JHEP 12(2025) 165 [2509.05834]

    2025

  19. [27]

    Henriksson,The tricritical Ising CFT and conformal bootstrap,JHEP08(2025) 031 [2501.18711]

    J. Henriksson,The tricritical Ising CFT and conformal bootstrap,JHEP08(2025) 031 [2501.18711]

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Koike and I

    K. Koike and I. Terada,Young-diagrammatic methods for the representation theory of the classical groups of typeBn,C n,D n,Journal of Algebra107(1987) 466

    1987

  21. [29]

    Henriksson,The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data,Phys

    J. Henriksson,The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data,Phys. Rept.1002 (2023) 1 [2201.09520]

    2023

  22. [30]

    Mihaila,Three-loop gauge beta function in non-simple gauge groups,PoS RADCOR2013(2013) 060

    L. Mihaila,Three-loop gauge beta function in non-simple gauge groups,PoS RADCOR2013(2013) 060

    2013

  23. [31]

    Poole and A.E

    C. Poole and A.E. Thomsen,Constraints on3- and4-loopβ-functions in a general four-dimensional Quantum Field Theory,JHEP09(2019) 055 [1906.04625]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Steudtner,General scalar renormalisation group equations at three-loop order,JHEP12 (2020) 012 [2007.06591]

    T. Steudtner,General scalar renormalisation group equations at three-loop order,JHEP12 (2020) 012 [2007.06591]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Steudtner,Towards general scalar-Yukawa renormalisation group equations at three-loop order,JHEP05(2021) 060 [2101.05823]

    T. Steudtner,Towards general scalar-Yukawa renormalisation group equations at three-loop order,JHEP05(2021) 060 [2101.05823]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bednyakov and A

    A. Bednyakov and A. Pikelner,Four-loop gauge and three-loop Yukawa beta functions in a general renormalizable theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 041801 [2105.09918]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Davies, F

    J. Davies, F. Herren and A.E. Thomsen,General gauge-Yukawa-quarticβ-functions at 4-3-2-loop order,JHEP01(2022) 051 [2110.05496]. – 30 –

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Bednyakov and A

    A. Bednyakov and A. Pikelner,Six-loop beta functions in general scalar theory,JHEP04 (2021) 233 [2102.12832]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Steudtner and A.E

    T. Steudtner and A.E. Thomsen,General quarticβ-function at three loops,JHEP10(2024) 163 [2408.05267]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Fonseca, P

    R.M. Fonseca, P. Olgoso and J. Santiago,Renormalization of general Effective Field Theories: formalism and renormalization of bosonic operators,JHEP07(2025) 135 [2501.13185]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Aebischer, L.C

    J. Aebischer, L.C. Bresciani and N. Selimovic,Anomalous dimension of a general effective gauge theory. Part I. Bosonic sector,JHEP08(2025) 209 [2502.14030]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Misiak and I

    M. Misiak and I. Nałęcz,One-loop renormalization group equations in generic effective field theories. Part I. Bosonic operators,JHEP06(2025) 210 [2501.17134]

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Fonseca, P

    R.M. Fonseca, P. Olgoso and J. Santiago,Renormalization of general effective field theories: renormalization of fermionic operators,JHEP07(2026) 094 [2512.15866]

    2026

  34. [42]

    Guedes and J

    G. Guedes and J. Roosmale Nepveu,Two-loop renormalization of general bosonic effective field theories,2512.08827

  35. [43]

    Henriksson, F

    J. Henriksson, F. Herzog, S.R. Kousvos and J. Roosmale Nepveu,Multiloop spectra in general scalar EFTs and CFTs,Phys. Lett. B874(2026) 140235 [2507.12518]

    2026

  36. [44]

    Henriksson, S.R

    J. Henriksson, S.R. Kousvos and J. Roosmale Nepveu,EFT meets CFT: multiloop renormalization of higher-dimensional operators in generalϕ4 theories,JHEP05(2026) 005 [2511.16740]

    2026

  37. [45]

    Penrose,Applications of negative-dimensional tensors, inCombinatorial Mathematics and Its Applications, D.J.A

    R. Penrose,Applications of negative-dimensional tensors, inCombinatorial Mathematics and Its Applications, D.J.A. Welsh, ed., (New York), pp. 221–244, Academic Press (1971)

    1971

  38. [46]

    King,The dimensions of irreducible tensor representations of the orthogonal and symplectic groups,Canadian Journal of Mathematics23(1971) 176

    R.C. King,The dimensions of irreducible tensor representations of the orthogonal and symplectic groups,Canadian Journal of Mathematics23(1971) 176

    1971

  39. [47]

    Mkrtchyan,The equivalence ofSp(2N)andSO(−2N)gauge theories,Physics Letters B 105(1981) 174

    R. Mkrtchyan,The equivalence ofSp(2N)andSO(−2N)gauge theories,Physics Letters B 105(1981) 174

    1981

  40. [48]

    Cvitanovic and A.D

    P. Cvitanovic and A.D. Kennedy,Spinors in negative dimensions,Physica Scripta26(1982) 5

    1982

  41. [49]

    Cvitanovic,Group theory: birdtracks, Lie’s, and exceptional groups, Princeton University Press (2008)

    P. Cvitanovic,Group theory: birdtracks, Lie’s, and exceptional groups, Princeton University Press (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    Mkrtchyan and A.P

    R.L. Mkrtchyan and A.P. Veselov,On duality and negative dimensions in the theory of Lie groups and symmetric spaces,J. Math. Phys.52(2011) 083514 [1011.0151]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Caputa, R

    P. Caputa, R. de Mello Koch and P. Diaz,Operators, Correlators and Free Fermions for SO(N) and Sp(N),JHEP06(2013) 018 [1303.7252]

    2013 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gurau and H

    R. Gurau and H. Keppler,Duality of orthogonal and symplectic random tensor models,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact.12(2025) 319 [2207.01993]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Keppler and T

    H. Keppler and T. Muller,Duality of orthogonal and symplectic random tensor models: general invariants,Lett. Math. Phys.113(2023) 83 [2304.03625]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Machado, S

    C.S. Machado, S. Renner and D. Sutherland,Building blocks of the flavourful SMEFT RG, JHEP03(2023) 226 [2210.09316]. – 31 –

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Renner, B

    S. Renner, B. Smith and D. Sutherland,Diagonalising the LEFT,JHEP12(2025) 113 [2507.18689]

    2025

  48. [56]

    P. Deligne,La Catégorie des Représentations du Groupe SymétriqueSt, lorsquetn’est pas un Entier Naturel, inProceedings of the International Colloquium on Algebraic Groups and Homogeneous Spaces, January 2004, pp. 209–273, TIFR, Mumbai (2007)

    2007

  49. [57]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris,Representation theory: a first course, vol. 129 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York (1991), 10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9

    1991 doi

  50. [58]

    Newell,Modification rules for the orthogonal and symplectic groups,Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Section A54(1951) 153

    M.J. Newell,Modification rules for the orthogonal and symplectic groups,Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Section A54(1951) 153

    1951

  51. [59]

    Littlewood,Products and plethysms of characters with orthogonal, symplectic and symmetric groups,Canadian Journal of Mathematics10(1958) 17

    D.E. Littlewood,Products and plethysms of characters with orthogonal, symplectic and symmetric groups,Canadian Journal of Mathematics10(1958) 17

    1958

  52. [60]

    Fonseca,The Sym2Int program: going from symmetries to interactions,J

    R.M. Fonseca,The Sym2Int program: going from symmetries to interactions,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.873(2017) 012045 [1703.05221]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Fonseca,Enumerating the operators of an effective field theory,Phys

    R.M. Fonseca,Enumerating the operators of an effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 035040 [1907.12584]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Fonseca,GroupMath: A Mathematica package for group theory calculations,Comput

    R.M. Fonseca,GroupMath: A Mathematica package for group theory calculations,Comput. Phys. Commun.267(2021) 108085 [2011.01764]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Littlewood,On invariant theory under restricted groups,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences239(1944) 387

    D.E. Littlewood,On invariant theory under restricted groups,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences239(1944) 387

    1944

  56. [64]

    Littlewood,The theory of group characters and matrix representations of groups, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2nd ed

    D.E. Littlewood,The theory of group characters and matrix representations of groups, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2nd ed. (1950)

    1950

  57. [65]

    El Samra and R.C

    N. El Samra and R.C. King,Dimensions of irreducible representations of the classical lie groups,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General12(1979) 2317

    1979

  58. [66]

    de Gennes,Exponents for the excluded volume problem as derived by the Wilson method, Phys

    P.G. de Gennes,Exponents for the excluded volume problem as derived by the Wilson method, Phys. Lett. A38(1972) 339

    1972

  59. [67]

    Roosmale Nepveu,Renormalization and the double copy of effective field theories, Ph.D

    J. Roosmale Nepveu,Renormalization and the double copy of effective field theories, Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Humboldt U., Berlin, 2024. 10.18452/29107

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    Wiese and A.A

    K.J. Wiese and A.A. Fedorenko,Depinning transition of charge-density waves: Mapping onto O(n)symmetricϕ 4 theory withn→−2and loop-erased random walks,Physical Review Letters123(2019) 197601

    2019

  61. [69]

    Wiese and A.A

    K.J. Wiese and A.A. Fedorenko,Field theories for loop-erased random walks,Nucl. Phys. B 946(2019) 114696 [1802.08830]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Kausch,Symplectic fermions,Nuclear Physics B583(2000) 513

    H.G. Kausch,Symplectic fermions,Nuclear Physics B583(2000) 513

    2000

  63. [71]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger,Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 015009 [1108.5735]

    2017 arXiv

  64. [72]

    L. Fei, S. Giombi, I.R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky,Critical Sp(N) models in 6−ϵ dimensions and higher spin dS/CFT,JHEP09(2015) 076 [1502.07271]

    2015 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, vol

    J.L. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, vol. 5 ofCambridge Lecture Notes in Physics, Cambridge University Press (1996), 10.1017/CBO9781316036440

    1996 doi

  66. [74]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari,Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory,Phys. Rept.368(2002) 549 [cond-mat/0012164]. – 32 –

    2002 arXiv

  67. [75]

    McKane,Reformulation ofn→0Models Using Anticommuting Scalar Fields,Phys

    A.J. McKane,Reformulation ofn→0Models Using Anticommuting Scalar Fields,Phys. Lett. A76(1980) 22

    1980

  68. [76]

    Fraser-Taliente,Local CFTs extremiseF,2604.15420

    L. Fraser-Taliente,Local CFTs extremiseF,2604.15420

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Parisi and N

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas,Random magnetic fields, supersymmetry, and negative dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 744

    1979

  70. [78]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman-graph generation,J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman-graph generation,J. Comput. Phys.105(1993) 279

    1993

  71. [79]

    Littlewood,On orthogonal and symplectic group characters,Journal of the London Mathematical Societys1-30(1955) 121

    D.E. Littlewood,On orthogonal and symplectic group characters,Journal of the London Mathematical Societys1-30(1955) 121

    1955

  72. [80]

    Albion, I

    S.P. Albion, I. Fischer, H. Höngesberg and F. Schreier-Aigner,Skew symplectic and orthogonal characters through lattice paths,European Journal of Combinatorics122(2024) 104000

    2024

  73. [81]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez and E. Sawyer,Nonrenormalization and operator mixing via on-shell methods,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 051601 [1910.05831]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Jenkins, A.V

    E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar, L. Naterop and J. Pagès,An algebraic formula for two loop renormalization of scalar quantum field theory,JHEP12(2023) 165 [2308.06315]

    2023 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Wegner,Critical exponents in isotropic spin systems,Phys

    F.J. Wegner,Critical exponents in isotropic spin systems,Phys. Rev. B6(1972) 1891

    1972

  76. [84]

    Bednyakov and A

    A. Bednyakov and A. Pikelner,Six-loop anomalous dimension of theϕQ operator in the O(N) symmetric model,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 076015 [2208.04612]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Derkachov and A.N

    S.E. Derkachov and A.N. Manashov,On the stability problem in theO(N)nonlinear sigma model,Phys. Rev. Lett.79(1997) 1423 [hep-th/9705020]

    1997 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Bednyakov, M.V

    A.V. Bednyakov, M.V. Kompaniets and A.V. Trenogin,On the six-loop scaling dimensions of the (ϕ2)n operators in d=3,Nucl. Phys. B1024(2026) 117331 [2512.05059]

    2026

  79. [87]

    Jack and D.R.T

    I. Jack and D.R.T. Jones,Anomalous dimensions forϕn in scale invariantd= 3theory, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 085012 [2007.07190]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Antipin, J

    O. Antipin, J. Bersini, J. Hafjall, G. Muco and F. Sannino,Exact results for the spectrum of the Ising conformal field theory,2511.08276

  81. [89]

    Balian and G

    R. Balian and G. Toulouse,Critical exponents for transitions withn=−2components of the order parameter,Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973) 544

    1973

  82. [90]

    Fisher,Classical,n-component spin systems or fields with negative even integraln, Phys

    M.E. Fisher,Classical,n-component spin systems or fields with negative even integraln, Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973) 679

    1973

  83. [91]

    P. Dey, A. Kaviraj and A. Sinha,Mellin space bootstrap for global symmetry,JHEP07 (2017) 019 [1612.05032]

    2017 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Vasiliev and A.S

    A.N. Vasiliev and A.S. Stepanenko,A method of calculating the critical dimensions of composite operators in the massless nonlinear sigma model,Theor. Math. Phys.95(1993) 471

    1993

  85. [93]

    Lang and W

    K. Lang and W. Ruhl,The criticalO(N)sigma model at dimensions2< d <4: Fusion coefficients and anomalous dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B400(1993) 597. – 33 –

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.