Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 45 references

Two-scale magnetically charged regular black holes from nonlinear electrodynamics and a T-duality-inspired zero-point length

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-scale regular black hole family supported by nonlinear electrodynamics is guaranteed to have a well-defined NED capture shadow outside the horizon.

desk verdict Solid inverse-NED regular black hole package; the metric is not new, but the WEC threshold, optical-admissibility theorem, and exact plasma shadow relations are — worth refereeing despite the parameter-dependent Lagrangian. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12541 v1 pith:4DS7MABB submitted 2026-08-12 gr-qc

Ali Ovgun , Reggie C. Pantig , Joel Saavedra This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords regularblackholesnonlinearelectrodynamicszero-pointlengthT-dualitymagneticchargeholeshadowplasmalensingthinaccretiondisk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds a static, spherically symmetric regular black hole whose metric carries two independent scales: the asymptotic magnetic charge $q$ and a zero-point length $\ell$ inherited from T-duality. For $q\neq 0$, it reconstructs the magnetic nonlinear-electrodynamics Lagrangian that sources the geometry, showing that the source has Maxwell weak-field behavior and a finite strong-field limit. It proves that every charged black hole in the family is optically admissible: the effective NED characteristic metric is nondegenerate throughout the exterior, so the extraordinary capture shadow is defined by a global minimum of the impact-parameter function. The same framework yields energy conditions, horizon thermodynamics, weak-field tests, and frequency-dependent plasma images, giving a concrete two-scale regular black-hole model whose optical signatures differ from ordinary geodesic shadows.

What carries the argument

The engine is the inverse magnetic reconstruction: for a metric written as $f(r)=1-2m(r)/r$, the NED source is fixed by $L(r)=4m'(r)/r^2$ and $L_F(r)=r^2[2m'(r)-rm''(r)]/(2q^2)$. For the two-scale mass function $m(r)=Mr^3/(r^2+\ell^2)^{3/2}-q^2r^3/[2(r^2+\ell^2)^2]$, this gives the explicit $L(F)$ of Eq. (34). The optical argument then runs through the characteristic functions $H=L_F$ and $P=H+2FL_{FF}=H-\frac{x}{2}H'$, whose positivity outside the horizon is proven by monotonicity in $s=\sqrt{1+x^2}$; the impact-parameter function $B=x^2H/(fP)$ selects the shadow at its global minimum.

What would settle it

Evaluate $H(x)=L_F(x)$ and $P(x)=L_F(x)+2FL_{FF}(x)$ from Eqs. (100)-(101) at a parameter pair $(e,\mu)$ above the extremality curve, scanning one dimension $x>x_+$; if either function reaches zero in the exterior, the optical-admissibility theorem is false. Equivalently, a shadow observation at known $M,q,\ell$ that agrees with the background-geodesic radius and disagrees with the predicted NED radius would falsify the optical-sector prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the line element of Eq. (2) defines a regular, two-scale magnetic black hole family that is self-consistent as an Einstein-NED system. For $q\neq 0$, inverse reconstruction from the mass function produces a single-valued Lagrangian $L(F)$ that reduces to Maxwell at weak field and stays finite as $F\to\infty$; this source depends explicitly on $M$, $q$, and $\ell$, so the family is an effective NED representation rather than a state space of one universal microscopic theory. The center is de Sitter, locally Minkowski, or anti-de Sitter according to the sign of $2M\ell-q^2$, and the weak energy condition holds globally if and only if $3M\ell\ge 2q^2$. On the optical side, the paper proves analytically that with $H=L_F$ and $P=L_F+2FL_{FF}$, both characteristic functions are strictly positive on the entire domain of outer communication for every charged black hole above extremality, so the extraordinary NED shadow is always well defined and is selected by the global minimum of the impact-parameter function $B=x^2H/(fP)$. This optical-admissibility theorem is the load-bearing result that connects the regularity of the geometry to the observability of its NED photon ring.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the reconstructed NED Lagrangian, which depends explicitly on $M$, $q$, and $\ell$, can serve as the matter source and as the basis for thermodynamics and optics; if a single universal NED action with $M$ and $q$ arising only as integration constants is required, the family's source support fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every charged black hole in the family has a nondegenerate extraordinary NED optical metric outside the horizon, so the NED capture shadow is always defined and does not require an additional numerical parameter-space cut.
  • The extraordinary NED shadow generally differs from the background-geodesic shadow; for the representative $\ell/M=0.2$, $q/M=0.3$, the NED shadow radius is about 10.3 percent smaller than the geodesic one.
  • The zero-point length first enters the weak-field metric beyond first post-Newtonian order, so solar-system Doppler-ranging bounds on the PPN parameter $\gamma$ constrain $\ell$ only through higher-order, impact-parameter-dependent proxies.
  • In a cold plasma, the central shadow disappears below a frequency-dependent cutoff; for the $\sigma=2$ power-law profile the exact relation $(R_{\rm sh}^{(g)}/M)^2=(R_{\rm sh}^{\rm geo}/M)^2-\nu_\infty^{-2}$ holds.
  • The generalized first law and Smarr relation retain the Wald area entropy, and the scale-free bound $Z\ge 0$ is violated by the zero-point length, giving a thermodynamic signature of the extra scale.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step is to ask whether some universal NED Lagrangian, with $M$ and $q$ arising as integration constants, admits Eq. (2) as a solution; the paper's parameter-dependent $L(F)$ makes this an open inverse problem, not a settled feature of the model.
  • Because the optical-admissibility theorem guarantees $B>0$ with divergences at horizon and infinity, it implies at least one unstable circular photon orbit outside every charged horizon; locating additional extrema or marginal light rings only requires a single-variable scan of $B'$.
  • The predicted shadow difference between the NED and geodesic channels is a clean observational discriminator: for an accreting black hole with independently known mass and charge-to-length ratios, measuring the shadow at the NED radius rather than the geodesic radius would test the optical sector directly.
  • The plasma cutoff frequencies suggest a frequency-sweep diagnostic: observing the shadow disappear and reappear as the observing frequency crosses $\nu_{\infty,e}$ would distinguish plasma reflection from intrinsic NED optics, provided the electron-density profile can be calibrated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a static, spherically symmetric regular black-hole family with metric function given by Eq. (2), containing the ADM mass M, a magnetic charge q, and a zero-point length ℓ as independent parameters. For q ≠ 0, the authors inverse-reconstruct a magnetic NED Lagrangian L(F) (Eq. (34)) that has a Maxwell weak-field limit and a finite strong-field limit, and they derive the global weak-energy condition (3Mℓ ≥ 2q²), the extremality curve, horizon thermodynamics with Wald area entropy, homogeneous Smarr-type identities, and an exact heat capacity. A central analytic result is the exterior optical-admissibility theorem of Sec. VI B, which proves that both characteristic functions H = L_F and P = L_F + 2F L_FF are strictly positive throughout the domain of outer communication for every charged black hole in the family. This is used to define the extraordinary NED capture shadow via the global minimum of the impact-parameter function. The paper then computes weak-field periapsis, bending, time-delay and redshift corrections, and analyzes frequency-dependent plasma shadows, Novikov–Thorne disk images, and emission spectra. Throughout, the authors explicitly state that the reconstructed L(F) depends on M, q, and ℓ and should be regarded as a parameter-dependent effective representation rather than a universal microscopic NED action.

Significance. If the derivations are correct, the paper delivers a self-consistent two-scale regular magnetically charged black-hole family with unusually complete analytic control: the energy conditions are decided by a single inequality, the optical admissibility is proven rather than scanned, and the shadow prescription is rigorously tied to the global minimum of B(x). The strengths include fully analytic proofs in Sec. VI B, explicit inverse reconstruction with Maxwell asymptotics, exact thermodynamic identities, and a careful separation between background-geodesic photons, extraordinary NED photons, and minimally coupled plasma rays. The main interpretational limitation, that Eq. (34) defines a different effective Lagrangian for each parameter set, is openly acknowledged in Secs. III C and X and does not undermine the internal consistency of the metric-level and optical calculations. The paper is a solid contribution to the regular-black-hole and NED-shadow literature.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase "sourced by magnetic nonlinear electrodynamics" should be qualified immediately, for example by adding "parameter-dependent effective" before "NED representation," because Eq. (34) defines a different L(F) for each (M, q, ℓ); without this qualifier the abstract overstates the universality of the matter source.
  2. [Sec. III C, Eq. (34)] When introducing the inverse-reconstructed Lagrangian, it would help to state explicitly that "single-valued" means for a fixed parameter set (M, q, ℓ) and that the q → 0 limit is not a regular limit of the inverse-NED formulas; this is noted later, but a reminder at the first occurrence would prevent misreading.
  3. [Sec. IX D] There is a typo in the sentence "with H = H = L_F and P = P = Φ"; it should read "with H = L_F and P = Φ".
  4. [Sec. V, Eq. (64)] At first use of T_th, it would be helpful to state explicitly that this quantity is the derivative of the horizon mass with respect to area entropy and is not the physical Hawking temperature entering the zeroth law; the paper does say this in the surrounding text, but a one-sentence reminder at Eq. (64) would make the distinction harder to miss.
  5. [Fig. 2 and Table I] The conditional one-parameter sensitivity interpretation is already clearly stated in the text; adding a short sentence in the Fig. 2 caption or Table I note that no joint fit is claimed would further prevent the numbers from being read as actual constraints on the model.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the inverse-NED reconstruction is disclosed as parameter-dependent, and the optical, thermodynamic, and plasma results are analytic consequences of the prescribed metric rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the direction stated by the paper. The metric (2) is the input ansatz, not the output of a fit; the Lagrangian L(F) in Eq. (34) is obtained from that metric through the inverse-reconstruction identities (10), and the paper explicitly identifies this as a parameter-dependent effective representation rather than a universal NED action. Section III C states that 'the reconstructed function (34) depends explicitly on the parameters M, q, and ell' and that 'the resulting family should be regarded as a parameter-dependent effective NED representation,' and Section X repeats that the family 'should not be interpreted as a continuous state space of one universal microscopic NED.' Because the metric is prescribed, the reconstructed source trivially satisfies the field equations, but this is standard inverse modeling, not circular fitting, and no fitted data or fitted parameters are renamed as predictions. The WEC condition (28), extremality curve (39), heat capacity (75), optical-admissibility theorem (111), light-ring function (118), shadow radius (120), weak-field observables (130)-(150), and plasma shadow relations (197) are all analytic outputs of the assumed f(r) and reconstructed L(F); none is used to define the parameters. The only self-citations, [33] and [35] for the shadow framework, are not load-bearing: the needed C/A stationarity condition is re-derived in Eqs. (157)-(160), and the citation supports only a standard reduction for static spherically symmetric optical metrics. No circular step can be exhibited, and the paper's own limitation statements make the scope of the inverse construction explicit rather than hiding it.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction rests on the metric ansatz and the inverse NED reconstruction. The model carries three geometric parameters (M, q, ell) plus two illustrative plasma parameters (omega_0, sigma); no quantity is fitted to external data. The main assumptions are the Einstein-NED framework, the validity of inverse reconstruction, the parameter-dependent effective nature of L(F), and the plasma and optical modeling choices. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • M
    ADM mass. It is an integration constant at the metric level, but it also enters the reconstructed NED Lagrangian, so it is a parameter of the effective model rather than a fitted constant.
  • q
    Asymptotic magnetic charge. Free parameter of the metric and of L(F); q=0 is excluded for the inverse NED reconstruction.
  • ell
    Zero-point length imported from T-duality phenomenology. Independently chosen scale that regularizes the center.
  • omega_0
    Plasma frequency normalization in the power-law density profile of Sec IX. Chosen as M omega0 = 1 for the illustrative spectra, not fitted to observations.
  • sigma
    Power-law index of the plasma density profile in Eq. (191). The paper studies sigma=2 and sigma=6 as representative cases.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Einstein gravity coupled to a magnetic nonlinear electrodynamics action of the form (3) is the correct framework for sourcing the metric.
    Sec II. The reconstruction identities (10) are derived within this framework; the paper does not derive this framework from string theory.
  • standard math The inverse-reconstruction identities (10) are valid on the magnetic branch.
    Sec II. They follow from Einstein's equations and the magnetic monopole ansatz and are standard in the NED black-hole literature.
  • ad hoc to paper The metric ansatz (2) with independent q and ell is a legitimate starting point.
    Sec I and Eq. (2). The form is chosen so that ell regularizes the mass and charge profiles and q reduces to the RN charge; it is not derived from a fundamental T-duality action.
  • ad hoc to paper The parameter-dependent reconstructed L(F) is acceptable as an effective matter source.
    Sec III C. The paper explicitly states that L(F) depends on M, q, and ell, so the model is not one universal microscopic NED theory.
  • standard math Wald entropy is the Bekenstein-Hawking area.
    Sec V A. The gravitational action is Einstein-Hilbert without higher-curvature terms; matter parameter dependence is handled through extended work terms.
  • domain assumption The extraordinary characteristic metric (11) describes vacuum photon propagation in the NED sector.
    Sec II and VIII. The paper follows the standard NED effective-geometry formalism of Refs. [21] and [13].
  • domain assumption The plasma is cold, nonmagnetized, transparent, pressureless, and co-rotating near the disk.
    Sec IX. These assumptions define the frequency-dependent shadow and disk-image calculations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-scale magnetically charged regular black holes from nonlinear electrodynamics and a T-duality-inspired zero-point length." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4DS7MABB

@misc{pith2026260812541,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-scale magnetically charged regular black holes from nonlinear electrodynamics and a T-duality-inspired zero-point length},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4DS7MABB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12541}
}
abstract

We construct a two-scale, static, spherically symmetric regular black hole in Einstein gravity sourced by magnetic nonlinear electrodynamics (NED). The zero-point length $\ell$ regularizes the mass and charge profiles, whereas $q$ is the asymptotic magnetic charge. The geometry approaches Reissner-Nordstr\"om at large radius, reduces to the neutral zero-point-length solution for $q=0$, and coincides geometrically with the Ay\'on-Beato-Garc\'ia solution for $\ell=|q|$. For $q\neq0$, inverse reconstruction gives a single-valued magnetic Lagrangian with Maxwell asymptotics and a finite strong-field limit. The center is regular and is de Sitter, locally Minkowski, or anti-de Sitter according to the sign of $2M\ell-q^2$; the weak energy condition holds globally if and only if $3M\ell\geq2q^2$. We derive the extremality curve, the exact heat capacity, and homogeneous horizon-variation and Smarr identities while retaining the Wald area entropy. We also prove that every charged black hole in this family has a nondegenerate extraordinary NED optical metric throughout the domain of outer communication. The associated capture shadow is selected by the global minimum of the optical impact-parameter function and generally differs from the background-geodesic shadow. Weak-field calculations yield the periapsis, bending, time-delay, and redshift corrections; in particular, $\ell$ first appears beyond the standard first-post-Newtonian parameters. Finally, for minimally coupled test radiation in a cold transparent plasma, we obtain exact parametric shadow relations for power-law density profiles and combine Hamiltonian ray tracing with a Novikov-Thorne disk model. A separate extraordinary NED-plasma continuation is displayed only as a phenomenological prescription because a material plasma breaks the conformal ambiguity of the vacuum characteristic metric.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12541 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Analytic physical-parameter map. Panel (a) shows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Weak-field signatures of the T-duality-inspired geometry. (a) The exact near-circular zero-point-length residual relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The illustrative normalization uses Mω0 = 1. Ta￾ble III reports the conserved frequency coordinate and normalizes every peak to the vacuum maximum. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spectral flux observed at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Specific-intensity maps for the power-law plasma profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    outermost

    The neutral T-duality-inspired shadow must instead be calculated directly from the background metric using Eq. (122). IX. FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SHADOW AND THIN-DISK EMISSION IN A PLASMA We now examine the propagation of electromagnetic radiation through an external plasma surrounding the T-duality-inspired regular black hole. We follow the rela- tivistic di...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Non-singular general-relativistic gravita- tional collapse,

    J. M. Bardeen, “Non-singular general-relativistic gravita- tional collapse,” inProceedings of the International Con- ference GR5, Tbilisi, U.S.S.R. (1968), p. 174

    work page 1968

  3. [3]

    Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D63, 044005 (2001) [arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 [gr-qc]]. 22

    arXiv 2001

  4. [4]

    Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynam- ics,

    E. Ayón-Beato and A. García, “Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynam- ics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5056–5059 (1998) [arXiv:gr- qc/9911046 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    New regular black hole solution from nonlinear electrodynamics,

    E. Ayón-Beato and A. García, “New regular black hole solution from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Lett. B 464, 25–29 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9911174 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,

    E. Ayón-Beato and A. García, “The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,” Phys. Lett. B493, 149– 152 (2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/0009077 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Vacuum nonsingular black hole,

    I. Dymnikova, “Vacuum nonsingular black hole,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit.24, 235–242 (1992)

    work page 1992

  8. [8]

    Formation and evaporation of nonsin- gular black holes,

    S. A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of nonsin- gular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 031103 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0506126 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2006

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Duality and zero-point length of spacetime,

    T. Padmanabhan, “Duality and zero-point length of spacetime,” Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1854–1857 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9608182 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Hypothesis of path integral duality. I. Quantum gravitational corrections to the propagator,

    T. Padmanabhan, “Hypothesis of path integral duality. I. Quantum gravitational corrections to the propagator,” Phys. Rev. D57, 6206–6215 (1998)

    1998

  3. [11]

    Quantum corrected black holes from string T-duality,

    P. Nicolini, E. Spallucci, and M. F. Wondrak, “Quantum corrected black holes from string T-duality,” Phys. Lett. B797, 134888 (2019) [arXiv:1902.11242 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Finite electrodynamics from T-duality,

    P. Gaete and P. Nicolini, “Finite electrodynamics from T-duality,” Phys. Lett. B829, 137100 (2022) [arXiv:2202.09311 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Geometrical aspects of light propagation in non- linear electrodynamics,

    M. Novello, V. A. De Lorenci, J. M. Salim, and R. Klip- pert, “Geometrical aspects of light propagation in non- linear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D61, 045001 (2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/9911085 [gr-qc]]

    2000 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Electromagnetic perturbations of black holes in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics,

    B. Toshmatov, Z. Stuchlík, J. Schee, and B. Ahmedov, “Electromagnetic perturbations of black holes in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D97, 084058 (2018) [arXiv:1805.00240 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Black hole thermo- dynamics without black hole solutions,

    M.-N. Yang, G.-Y. Lu, and H. Lü, “Black hole thermo- dynamics without black hole solutions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 251403 (2026) [arXiv:2512.09930 [hep-th]]

    2026

  8. [16]

    Charged black holes from T-duality,

    P. Gaete, K. Jusufi, and P. Nicolini, “Charged black holes from T-duality,” Phys. Lett. B835, 137546 (2022) [arXiv:2205.15441 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Gravitational perturbations of a regular T-duality inspired black hole: Quasinormal modes, excitation factors, and time-domain evolution,

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, M. Abdullaev, R. Javlon, S. Jumaniy- ozov and S. Karshiboev, “Gravitational perturbations of a regular T-duality inspired black hole: Quasinormal modes, excitation factors, and time-domain evolution,” [arXiv:2607.07715 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Weak gravitational lensing of charged black holefromT-dualityinplasma,

    S. Orzuev, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov and F. Botirov, “Weak gravitational lensing of charged black holefromT-dualityinplasma,” NewAstron.126, 102555 (2026) doi:10.1016/j.newast.2026.102555

    2026

  11. [19]

    Null geodesics, QNMs, emission energy and thermal fluctuation of charged T- duality black hole with simple logarithmic correction,

    F. Javed and M. H. Alshehri, “Null geodesics, QNMs, emission energy and thermal fluctuation of charged T- duality black hole with simple logarithmic correction,” Results Phys.62, 107837 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Exploring thin-shell dynamics in regular charged black hole through T-duality,

    F. Javed, S. Mumtaz, G. Mustafa, F. Atamurotov and S. G. Ghosh, “Exploring thin-shell dynamics in regular charged black hole through T-duality,” Chin. J. Phys. 88, 55-68 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2023.12.029

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    T-duality/plurality of BTZ black hole met- ric coupled to two fermionic fields,

    A. Eghbali, M. Hosseinpour-Sadid and A. Rezaei- Aghdam, “T-duality/plurality of BTZ black hole met- ric coupled to two fermionic fields,” JHEP03, 040 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)040 [arXiv:2309.14543 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Can a light ray distinguish the charge of a black hole in nonlin- ear electrodynamics?

    B. Toshmatov, B. Ahmedov, and D. Malafarina, “Can a light ray distinguish the charge of a black hole in nonlin- ear electrodynamics?” Phys. Rev. D103, 024026 (2021) [arXiv:2101.05496 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Regular black holes sourced by non- linear electrodynamics,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Regular black holes sourced by non- linear electrodynamics,” inRegular Black Holes: To- wards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse, edited by C. Bambi (Springer, Singapore, 2023), pp. 37–67 [arXiv:2211.00743 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Quantum gravity and the zero point length,

    P. Nicolini, “Quantum gravity and the zero point length,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit.54, 106 (2022) [arXiv:2208.05390 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    La- grangian reverse engineering for regular black holes,

    A. Bokulić, E. Franzin, T. Jurić, and I. Smolić, “La- grangian reverse engineering for regular black holes,” Phys. Lett. B854, 138750 (2024) [arXiv:2311.17151 [gr- qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Shadow of the regular Bardeen black holes and comparison of the motion of photons and neutrinos,

    Z. Stuchlík and J. Schee, “Shadow of the regular Bardeen black holes and comparison of the motion of photons and neutrinos,” Eur. Phys. J. C79, 44 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Electrically charged regular black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics: Light rings, shadows, and gravitational lensing,

    M. A. A. de Paula, H. C. D. Lima Junior, P. V. P. Cunha, and L. C. B. Crispino, “Electrically charged regular black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics: Light rings, shadows, and gravitational lensing,” Phys. Rev. D108, 084029 (2023) [arXiv:2305.04776 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies,

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, “Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies,” Phys. Rep.947, 1–39 (2022) [arXiv:2105.07101 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole,

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope Collabora- tion), “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019) [arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope re- sults. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way,

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope Collabora- tion), “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope re- sults. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022) [arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Recoveryofconsistency in thermodynamics of regular black holes in Einstein’s gravity coupled with nonlinear electrodynamics,

    Y.Guo, H.Xie, andY.-G.Miao, “Recoveryofconsistency in thermodynamics of regular black holes in Einstein’s gravity coupled with nonlinear electrodynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B1000, 116491 (2024) [arXiv:2306.12709 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Shadow signatures and energy accumulation in Lorentzian- Euclidean black holes,

    E. Battista, S. Capozziello and C. Y. Chen, “Shadow signatures and energy accumulation in Lorentzian- Euclidean black holes,” Phys. Rev. D113, no.10, 104039 (2026) [arXiv:2601.10806 [gr-qc]]

    2026 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Smarr’s formula for black holes with non- linear electrodynamics,

    N. Bretón, “Smarr’s formula for black holes with non- linear electrodynamics,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit.37, 643– 650 (2005) [arXiv:gr-qc/0405116 [gr-qc]]

    2005 arXiv

  26. [34]

    General approach on shadow radius and photon spheres in asymp- totically flat spacetimes and the impact of mass- dependent variations,

    V. Vertogradov and A. Övgün, “General approach on shadow radius and photon spheres in asymp- totically flat spacetimes and the impact of mass- dependent variations,” Phys. Lett. B854, 138758 (2024) [arXiv:2404.18536 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Perturbation theory for gravitational shadows in static spherically symmetric spacetimes,

    K. Kobialko and D. Gal’tsov, “Perturbation theory for gravitational shadows in static spherically symmetric spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.4, 044071 (2025) [arXiv:2410.16127 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gravitational black hole shadow spectroscopy,

    R. C. Pantig and A. Övgün, “Gravitational black hole shadow spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. D112, 124072 (2025) [arXiv:2509.05594 [hep-th]]

    2025

  29. [37]

    Gravita- tional shadow and emission spectrum of thin accretion disks in a plasma medium,

    K. Kobialko, D. Gal’tsov, and A. Molchanov, “Gravita- tional shadow and emission spectrum of thin accretion disks in a plasma medium,” Phys. Rev. D112, 044039 (2025) [arXiv:2505.07993 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically 23 symmetric black hole,

    V. Perlick, O. Y. Tsupko, and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, “Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically 23 symmetric black hole,” Phys. Rev. D92, 104031 (2015) [arXiv:1507.04217 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Relativistic radi- ation transport in dispersive media,

    S. Kichenassamy and R. A. Krikorian, “Relativistic radi- ation transport in dispersive media,” Phys. Rev. D32, 1866–1870 (1985)

    1985

  32. [40]

    Relativistic transport theory,

    R. W. Lindquist, “Relativistic transport theory,” Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)37, 487–518 (1966)

    1966

  33. [41]

    Disk-accretion onto a black hole. Time-averaged structure of accretion disk,

    D. N. Page and K. S. Thorne, “Disk-accretion onto a black hole. Time-averaged structure of accretion disk,” Astrophys. J.191, 499–506 (1974)

    1974

  34. [42]

    Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(Springer, Singapore, 2017)

    C. Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(Springer, Singapore, 2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Precession of Mercury’s Perihelion from Ranging to the MESSEN- GER Spacecraft,

    R. S. Park, W. M. Folkner, A. S. Konopliv, J. G. Williams, D. E. Smith and M. T. Zuber, “Precession of Mercury’s Perihelion from Ranging to the MESSEN- GER Spacecraft,” Astron. J.153, no.3, 121 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Measurement of the Solar Gravitational Deflection ofRadioWavesusingGeodeticVery-Long-BaselineInter- ferometry Data, 1979-1999,

    S. S. Shapiro, J. L. Davis, D. E. Lebach and J. S. Gre- gory, “Measurement of the Solar Gravitational Deflection ofRadioWavesusingGeodeticVery-Long-BaselineInter- ferometry Data, 1979-1999,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 121101 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft,

    B. Bertotti, L. Iess and P. Tortora, “A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft,” Nature425, 374-376 (2003)

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.