Optical development of the BISOU breadboard

Bruno Borgo; Bruno Maffei; Cl\'emence de Jabrun; Creidhe O'Sullivan; Morgane Loquet Le Gall; Neil Trappe; Valentin Sauvage

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 14 references

Optical development of the BISOU breadboard

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The BISOU warm breadboard optical layout—a polarizing Martin-Puplett FTS with a 300 GHz dichroic split and an off-axis Mizuguchi-Dragone telescope—can validate the instrument's optical design and alignment before the cold model is…

desk verdict A well-written status report on the BISOU warm breadboard optical design; no quantitative validation yet, but the design choices are clear and the paper is honest about what remains to be done. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13225 v1 pith:4H3RWR2X submitted 2026-08-13 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.CO

Morgane Loquet Le Gall , Creidhe O'Sullivan , Bruno Borgo , Clémence De Jabrun , Valentin Sauvage , Neil Trappe , Bruno Maffei This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.CO

keywords BISOUBalloon-borneexperimentBreadboardmodelCosmicMicrowaveBackground(CMB)SpectraldistortionsFourierTransformSpectrometer(FTS)GaussianbeamanalysisPhysicalopticsmodeling

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the optical design of the warm breadboard for BISOU, a balloon pathfinder aimed at measuring spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background. It argues that the proposed layout—a polarizing Martin-Puplett FTS with two inputs, an off-axis Mizuguchi-Dragone telescope, a dichroic splitting the band at 300 GHz, and a relay chain feeding two detector units—is a workable configuration that allows the optical design and alignment procedures to be validated before the cold model is assembled. The breadboard is meant to characterise systematic effects such as path asymmetry, window emissivity, and optical path difference errors that would otherwise corrupt a spectral distortion measurement. If the layout works, the same cryogenic test facility can serve as a systematics testbed for the balloon payload and the future space mission concept.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the polarizing Martin-Puplett FTS, a two-input polarizing interferometer whose moving mirror pair M3 scans an optical path difference and whose wire-grid polarisers A–D combine the sky beam with the 2.7 K blackbody reference. The interferogram's modulated part is proportional to the difference between the two inputs, so the sky spectrum is recovered by adding or subtracting the known reference spectrum. Supporting mechanisms include the off-axis Mizuguchi-Dragone telescope that minimizes cross-polarization and astigmatism, the parabolic M5 mirror that places the dichroic in a collimated beam, the 300 GHz dichroic dividing the band, and the M6 mirrors that direct the beams onto a common focal plane. The design is developed through the ray-tracing, Gaussian-beam, and physical-optics ladder, with a -20 dB edge taper target on the primary reflector.

What would settle it

Illuminate the sky input with a well-characterised external blackbody at a known temperature, keep the internal reference near 2.7 K, and compare the FTS-reconstructed spectrum to the known input across 90–1500 GHz; a deviation larger than the 15 GHz resolution or target sensitivity, traceable to reference-arm emissivity or stray light, would refute the claim that the breadboard validates the measurement concept.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the described optical layout is a workable breadboard design that will allow validation of the optical design and alignment before the cold model is assembled. The layout combines a polarizing Martin-Puplett FTS—two inputs, sky and internal blackbody reference—with a 300 GHz dichroic split, an off-axis Mizuguchi-Dragone Cassegrain telescope on the sky arm, and a relay chain of five mirror pairs plus M6 focusing mirrors. The warm configuration is deliberately simplified to two detector units so that alignment and systematic characterisation can be done while the feedhorns lie in the FTS plane. By construction, the differential measurement isolates the sky-minus-reference signal, and the dichroic split reduces photon noise on the low-frequency channels where the spectral distortion signature is sought.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the internal reference is a blackbody at 2.7 K whose spectrum is known exactly enough that adding or subtracting it from the measured interferogram recovers the true sky spectrum; any uncharacterised emissivity, temperature variation, or stray light on the reference arm corrupts the retrieval.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Completing the warm breadboard would give a reconfigurable testbed in which the full optical chain and its alignment procedures can be rehearsed before the cold model is assembled.
The dichroic split at 300 GHz lowers the optical power on the low-frequency detectors, so the low-frequency channel where the spectral distortion signature is targeted should be less photon-noise limited.
Coupling the cryostat window to an atmospheric chamber would allow the team to characterise how residual atmosphere at balloon altitude affects the measured spectrum, a systematic that cannot be tested with the cold model alone.
The modular focal plane supports both the simplified two-detector warm configuration and the flight-like four-detector two-level layout, letting one cryostat test two geometries.
Physical-optics modelling should capture diffraction effects that become important at the lowest frequencies, where the beam is widest.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct test of the reference-arm assumption would be to replace the internal 2.7 K reference with a second well-characterised blackbody at several temperatures; any discrepancy in the reconstructed sky spectrum would quantify the emissivity and stray-light systematic that the paper lists as future work.
The two-detector warm geometry may not excite the same polarisation cross-coupling as the four-detector two-level layout, so a null comparison with the cold model would be needed to confirm that alignment procedures carry over.
If optical path difference determination from the moving mirrors dominates the error budget, the Gaussian-beam and physical-optics models could predict a pattern of spectral contamination; matching that pattern against measured interferograms would turn the breadboard into a direct systematic budget.
The same cryostat could measure the window and thermal-filter emissivity versus frequency, effectively making the breadboard a calibration instrument for the balloon payload.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

This is a status report on an instrument under construction, not a validation paper. What's actually new is the warm breadboard configuration: M5 switched from elliptical to parabolic, dichroic placed in a collimated beam, and the warm model reduced to two detector units. That's a legitimate incremental update to the BISOU/FOSSIL optical design, and the paper describes it clearly.

The paper does well at laying out the measurement principle, the cryostat facility, and the three-tier analysis strategy (ray tracing, Gaussian beam, physical optics). The authors are upfront that full Gaussian beam and multimode feedhorn modeling is future work. That honesty matters. The citation to their own SPIE paper for the M3 motion study is fine, since it's the natural reference and it doesn't feed a new prediction here.

The soft spot is the edge taper claim. In Section 3.2 they say the design was refined to meet the -20 dB edge taper requirement on the 150 mm primary reflector, but they give no beam sizes, no edge taper value, no tolerance analysis. The stress-test note is right that the lowest frequencies, where diffraction is most dangerous, are exactly the regime not yet analyzed. So the conclusion that the breadboard will allow validation of alignment procedures is an expectation, not a demonstrated result. I'd also note the internal blackbody reference assumption is load-bearing, but that's a system-wide requirement for any absolute FTS; this paper isn't the place to settle it.

Are these flaws fatal? For a design status paper, no. The paper doesn't claim measurements or completed simulations; it describes a plan and labels the next steps. The risk is that a reader walks away thinking the optics are validated when they aren't. If the venue is a proceedings or a journal that publishes instrument progress reports, this is a fair, useful contribution. If the venue demands original validated results, it's thin.

Worth reading for anyone tracking BISOU/FOSSIL. Not a must-read for general cosmologists. I'd send it to review with a note asking the authors to clearly label the edge taper compliance as preliminary and temper the conclusion accordingly.

Recommendation: deserves a serious referee; expect a modest revision or at least a wording fix.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports the current optical design and development status of the BISOU breadboard, a warm laboratory model planned to validate the optical concept of the BISOU balloon-borne Fourier transform spectrometer for CMB spectral-distortion measurements. The design is a differential polarizing Martin-Puplett FTS with two inputs: a sky-facing off-axis Mizuguchi-Dragone telescope and an internal 2.7 K blackbody reference. The optical chain uses pairs of mirrors M1-M5, a dichroic that splits the 90-1500 GHz band at about 300 GHz, and M6 mirrors that focus the beams onto multimode feedhorns and detector focal planes. The paper describes the cryogenic test facility, the warm-model simplification to two detector units, and the intended analysis workflow of ray tracing, Gaussian beam propagation, and physical optics with GRASP. It concludes that the warm breadboard will allow validation of the optical design and alignment procedures before the cold model is assembled.

Significance. If the design and its quantitative performance were fully demonstrated, this breadboard would be a valuable testbed for BISOU and the FOSSIL mission concept, since the paper correctly identifies the key systematic concerns: asymmetric FTS arms, cryostat window emissivity, dichroic band splitting, M3-induced beam effects, and OPD accuracy. The paper gives a clear, well-motivated optical architecture: the dichroic is placed in a collimated beam, the M6 pair co-locates detection units at a common focal plane, and the modular focal plane supports different configurations. However, the manuscript contains no quantitative validation: no beam radii, edge-taper values, tolerance analysis, or physical-optics results are reported, and the load-bearing claims about the Gaussian-beam-refined design and the benign effect of M3 motion are deferred to cited future work. The significance of the paper therefore rests on expectations rather than demonstrated results.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.2, Fig. 4] The statement that the design was refined using Gaussian beam propagation to meet the -20 dB edge taper requirement on the 150 mm diameter primary is not supported by any reported number. The paper gives no beam waist at the primary, no computed edge taper, no frequency at which the calculation was performed, and no tolerance or alignment analysis. This is load-bearing because the conclusion in Section 4 that the warm breadboard will validate the optical design depends on the design already satisfying its performance requirements. Please add a table of beam sizes at the key mirrors and the computed edge taper at the primary, including the 90 GHz case where diffraction is strongest, or explicitly state that the edge-taper requirement is a target to be demonstrated in future work rather than a result of this paper.
[Section 3.3] The claim that moving M3 with a translation of four times the real mirror stroke does not introduce major impacts on the beam shape is supported only by reference [14], the authors' own prior SPIE paper. Since M3 motion is central to the FTS interferogram and to the breadboard's stated role as a systematic-effects testbed, the present paper should report at least the beam centroid displacement, aberration change, or spillover variation as a function of OPD. Without this quantitative summary, the assertion is an appeal to unpublished or non-included prior work, and the conclusion that the breadboard will validate alignment procedures is not yet established.
[Section 2.1] The sky-spectrum retrieval assumes that the internal reference blackbody spectrum is known exactly, as stated by 'adding or subtracting the known spectrum of the reference.' The paper does not quantify how accurately the reference emissivity, temperature, or stray light must be known to meet BISOU's spectral-distortion science goals, nor does it describe a breadboard measurement that will establish this accuracy. Because the breadboard is motivated as a systematic-effects testbed, the authors should either add a brief error budget for the reference spectrum and a test plan for characterizing it, or explicitly state that radiometric reference calibration is outside the optical-design scope of this paper.

minor comments (5)

[Section 4 (Conclusion)] The sentence 'will allow for the validation the optical design and alignment procedures' is missing the word 'of'; it should read 'validation of the optical design.'
[Section 3.2] The sentence 'On the telescope side colored in red in Fig 4, mirrors M1 to M4 are (M3 to M6)' is confusing as written and appears to contain a typo or a garbled mirror-number mapping; please rewrite it to clearly specify which mirror numbers are on the sky side and which on the reference side.
[Section 3.3 heading] The heading 'F uture work' contains a spurious space and should be 'Future Work.'
[Figure 4 caption and Section 3.2] The text says the FTS consists of five pairs of mirrors M1-M5, but the caption mentions M1-M5 and then a separate M6 pair; please clarify the total number of mirror pairs and their numbering to avoid the impression that six pairs are being called five.
[References] Reference [14] is a self-citation of the authors' own work; it would be helpful to state explicitly in Section 3.3 that the M3-motion analysis was presented there, and to include its key quantitative results in this paper for self-containment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper reports an optical layout and test plan without deriving predictions from fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper makes no new analytic derivations and presents no fitted parameters that are later renamed as predictions. Its central claim is that a warm breadboard 'will allow for the validation of the optical design and alignment procedures before the cold model is assembled' (Section 4). This is a forward-looking engineering statement, not a result derived from the data it predicts. The measurement principle does assume that the internal reference has a 'known spectrum' (Section 2.1), but that is an external calibration input, not something derived from the sky measurement within this paper; acknowledging that this needs study is a limitation, not circularity. The only notable self-citation is reference [14], cited to support the statement that 'moving M3 with a translation of four times the real mirror stroke does not introduce major impacts on the beam shape' (Section 3.3). That prior work is by overlapping authors, but it is not used to define or fit the present design's performance, and the paper explicitly lists the M3 de-pointing, aberration, and spillover studies as future work rather than relying on the citation as the proof of the breadboard's validity. No equation or derived quantity in this paper is equivalent by construction to an input, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on standard assumptions about FTS measurement and optical design; none are quantified or verified here. There are no data-fit free parameters because the paper reports no data. The dichroic cutoff is a hand-set design specification, and the reference blackbody, Gaussian beam model, Mizuguchi-Dragone condition, and dichroic behavior are background assumptions that are not demonstrated.

free parameters (1)

Dichroic cutoff frequency = 300 GHz
Chosen to split the 90-1500 GHz band and reduce photon noise on the low-frequency channel; not fitted from measured data, but a hand-set design parameter.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The internal reference blackbody at 2.7 K has a known, stable spectrum.
Section 2.1: adding or subtracting the known reference spectrum is required for sky retrieval. This is not verified in the paper.
domain assumption Gaussian beam optics adequately models multimode feedhorn and sub-K detector coupling for the design.
Section 3.2 uses Gaussian beam propagation for analytical beam size estimation and edge taper targeting.
domain assumption The Mizuguchi-Dragone off-axis Cassegrain configuration minimizes cross-polarization and astigmatism.
Section 3.2: the telescope design relies on this condition to keep beam quality.
domain assumption The dichroic in a collimated beam has a stable 300 GHz cutoff with negligible incidence-angle effects.
Section 3.2: the dichroic is placed in a collimated beam to avoid spurious effects, but no measured dichroic performance is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical development of the BISOU breadboard." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4H3RWR2X

@misc{pith2026260813225,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical development of the BISOU breadboard},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4H3RWR2X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13225}
}

read the original abstract

BISOU (Balloon Interferometer for Spectral Observations of the primordial Universe) is an astronomical balloon-borne pathfinder developed as part of a preparatory study for a future space mission aimed at measuring spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). A laboratory breadboard of the instrument is being developed at the Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale (IAS), enabling the characterization of subsystems and instrument systematic effects, particularly in the optical system. The optical system is based on a differential polarizing Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) that receives inputs from both a sky-facing telescope and an internal calibration source. The FTS focal planes include sub-K detectors coupled to multimode feed horns. The full spectral band, spanning between 90 and 1500 GHz, is sub-divided into two frequency sub-bands, thanks to the use of a dichroic. The optical analysis first relies on ray-tracing simulations to establish the overall configuration of the system, before proceeding to more advanced Gaussian beam and physical optics analyses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13225 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Left: Conceptual view of the measurement method. The sky signal (red) and the Black Body internal reference (BBIR, blue) are injected into the interferometer by mirrors M1, then combined through a sequence of polarisers (A,B,C and D). Mirrors M3 introduce an optical path difference (OPD) between the two arms of the FTS. At the output, a dichroic splits the signal into two spectral bands (high and low frequency), mea… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Cross-sectional view of the BISOU CAD model. The helium tank is visible above the cold plate, on which the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Schematic diagram of the BISOU Breadboard . One beam comes from the sky and another from the internal 2.7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Optical layout of the BBM instrument. Light is collected from the BlackBody Internal Reference source (top left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

[14]

Optical concept model of the future cosmology project bisou,

Loquet Le Gall, M., Maffei, B., Guiot, P., O’Sullivan, C., and Trappe, N., “Optical concept model of the future cosmology project bisou,” in [Optical Design and Engineering X],14106, SPIE (may 2026)

work page 2026
[1]

A preliminary measurement of the cosmic microwave background spectrum by the cosmic background explorer (cobe) satellite,

Mather, J. C. et al., “A preliminary measurement of the cosmic microwave background spectrum by the cosmic background explorer (cobe) satellite,”The Astrophysical Journal Letters354, L37 (May 1990)

work page 1990
[2]

The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background,

Fixsen, D. J., “The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background,”ApJ707, 916–920 (Dec. 2009)

work page 2009
[3]

New horizons in cosmology with spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background,

Chluba, J., Abitbol, M. H., Aghanim, N., Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, Y., Alvarez, M., Basu, K., Bolliet, B., Burigana, C., de Bernardis, P., Delabrouille, J., Dimastrogiovanni, E., Finelli, F., Fixsen, D., Hart, L., Hern´ andez- Monteagudo, C., Hill, J. C., Kogut, A., Kohri, K., Lesgourgues, J., Maffei, B., Mather, J., Mukherjee, S., Patil, S. P., Ravenni, A., Remaze...

2021
[4]

Fts for cmb spectral distortion exploration: A mission concept for the m-class esa call

Aghanim, N. and FOSSIL Collaboration, “Fts for cmb spectral distortion exploration: A mission concept for the m-class esa call.”http://www.ias.u-psud.fr/sites/default/files/FOSSIL-web_0.pdf(2022). Accessed: 2026-03-22

2022
[5]

BISOU: a balloon pathfinder for CMB spectral distortions studies,

Maffei, B., Aghanim, N., Aumont, J., Battistelli, E., Beelen, A., Besnard, A., Borgo, B., Calvo, M., Catalano, A., Chluba, J., Coulon, X., De Bernardis, P., de Jabrun, C., Douspis, M., Errard, J., Grain, J., Guiot, P., Hill, J. C., Ishino, H., Kogut, A., Lagache, G., Macias-Perez, J., Masi, S., Matsumura, T., Monfardini, A., O’Sullivan, C., Pagano, L., Pa...

work page 2024
[6]

Tentative detection of a cosmic far-infrared background with COBE.,

Puget, J.-L., Abergel, A., Bernard, J.-P., Boulanger, F., Burton, W. B., Desert, F.-X., and Hartmann, D., “Tentative detection of a cosmic far-infrared background with COBE.,”A&A308, L5 (Apr. 1996)

work page 1996
[7]

Polarised interferometric spectrometry for the millimeter and submillimeter spectrum.,

Martin, D. H. and Puplett, E., “Polarised interferometric spectrometry for the millimeter and submillimeter spectrum.,”Infrared Physics10, 105–109 (Jan. 1970)

1970

Show all 14 references

[8]

Preparing future instrument to high-precision spectroscopy of the cosmic microwave background,

Coulon, X., Maffei, B., Aghanim, N., and Pagano, L., “Preparing future instrument to high-precision spectroscopy of the cosmic microwave background,” in [Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave], Coyle, L. E., Matsuura, S., and Perrin,...

2024
[9]

Decision-tree guided instrumental optimisation for cmb spectral distortion measurements with an fts,

Coulon, X., Maffei, B., and Aghanim, N., “Decision-tree guided instrumental optimisation for cmb spectral distortion measurements with an fts,” in [Proc. SPIE, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2026: Mil- limeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentatio...

2026
[10]

Ansys zemax opticstudio,

Ansys, “Ansys zemax opticstudio,” (2024)

2024
[11]

Goldsmith, P., [Quasioptical Systems: Gaussian Beam Quasioptical Propagation and Applications], IEEE Press series on microwave technology and techniques (1998)

1998
[12]

Grasp software,

TICRA, “Grasp software,” (2024)

2024
[13]

Offset multireflector antennas with perfect pattern symmetry and polarization discrimina- tion,

Dragone, C., “Offset multireflector antennas with perfect pattern symmetry and polarization discrimina- tion,”AT&T Technical Journal57, 2663–2684 (Sept. 1978)

1978

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [14]

Optical concept model of the future cosmology project bisou,

Loquet Le Gall, M., Maffei, B., Guiot, P., O’Sullivan, C., and Trappe, N., “Optical concept model of the future cosmology project bisou,” in [Optical Design and Engineering X],14106, SPIE (may 2026)

work page 2026

[2] [1]

A preliminary measurement of the cosmic microwave background spectrum by the cosmic background explorer (cobe) satellite,

Mather, J. C. et al., “A preliminary measurement of the cosmic microwave background spectrum by the cosmic background explorer (cobe) satellite,”The Astrophysical Journal Letters354, L37 (May 1990)

work page 1990

[3] [2]

The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background,

Fixsen, D. J., “The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background,”ApJ707, 916–920 (Dec. 2009)

work page 2009

[4] [3]

New horizons in cosmology with spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background,

Chluba, J., Abitbol, M. H., Aghanim, N., Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, Y., Alvarez, M., Basu, K., Bolliet, B., Burigana, C., de Bernardis, P., Delabrouille, J., Dimastrogiovanni, E., Finelli, F., Fixsen, D., Hart, L., Hern´ andez- Monteagudo, C., Hill, J. C., Kogut, A., Kohri, K., Lesgourgues, J., Maffei, B., Mather, J., Mukherjee, S., Patil, S. P., Ravenni, A., Remaze...

2021

[5] [4]

Fts for cmb spectral distortion exploration: A mission concept for the m-class esa call

Aghanim, N. and FOSSIL Collaboration, “Fts for cmb spectral distortion exploration: A mission concept for the m-class esa call.”http://www.ias.u-psud.fr/sites/default/files/FOSSIL-web_0.pdf(2022). Accessed: 2026-03-22

2022

[6] [5]

BISOU: a balloon pathfinder for CMB spectral distortions studies,

Maffei, B., Aghanim, N., Aumont, J., Battistelli, E., Beelen, A., Besnard, A., Borgo, B., Calvo, M., Catalano, A., Chluba, J., Coulon, X., De Bernardis, P., de Jabrun, C., Douspis, M., Errard, J., Grain, J., Guiot, P., Hill, J. C., Ishino, H., Kogut, A., Lagache, G., Macias-Perez, J., Masi, S., Matsumura, T., Monfardini, A., O’Sullivan, C., Pagano, L., Pa...

work page 2024

[7] [6]

Tentative detection of a cosmic far-infrared background with COBE.,

Puget, J.-L., Abergel, A., Bernard, J.-P., Boulanger, F., Burton, W. B., Desert, F.-X., and Hartmann, D., “Tentative detection of a cosmic far-infrared background with COBE.,”A&A308, L5 (Apr. 1996)

work page 1996

[8] [7]

Polarised interferometric spectrometry for the millimeter and submillimeter spectrum.,

Martin, D. H. and Puplett, E., “Polarised interferometric spectrometry for the millimeter and submillimeter spectrum.,”Infrared Physics10, 105–109 (Jan. 1970)

1970