Optical concept model of the future cosmology project BISOU

Bruno Maffei; Creidhe O'Sullivan; Morgane Loquet Le Gall; Neil Trappe; Pierre Guiot

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 15 references

Optical concept model of the future cosmology project BISOU

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Simulations show BISOU's five-mirror Fourier-transform spectrometer keeps optical losses below 7.5% and beam pointing stable within ±0.1° across a four-times-overdrive mirror scan.

desk verdict Workmanlike optical design study for the BISOU balloon FTS; numbers are plausible but the monomode Gaussian approximation and a factor-two OPD error need attention. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13257 v1 pith:B7ARJWGX submitted 2026-08-13 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.CO

Morgane Loquet Le Gall , Bruno Maffei , Pierre Guiot , Creidhe O'Sullivan , Neil Trappe This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.CO

keywords BISOUCMBspectraldistortionsFourierTransformSpectrometerGaussianbeamanalysisphysicalopticsspilloverballoon-borneinstrumentopticaldesign

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

BISOU is a balloon-borne Fourier-transform spectrometer built to detect tiny deviations of the cosmic microwave background's spectrum from a perfect blackbody. This paper establishes, through Gaussian-beam and physical-optics simulations, that the proposed five-mirror optical chain is efficient and stable enough for that goal. At 90 GHz, the lowest and most diffractive operating frequency, spillover inside the interferometer stays below 0.2% and the full optical system, interferometer plus telescope, loses less than 7.5% of the power. When the scan mirrors are pushed to ±10 mm, four times the stroke required for the target resolution, the beam stays centred within ±0.1° and keeps its shape, with at most 0.5 dB of directivity loss. These numbers are what make the instrument's sensitivity target plausible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is Gaussian-beam propagation: the feedhorn is modelled as a monomode Gaussian source with a 9 mm waist at 90 GHz, and the beam envelope is carried through the optical system with physical optics. The edge taper, the chosen attenuation at each mirror's edge, is the lever that sets spillover, with −35 dB demanded on FTS mirrors to contain 98% of the beam power and −20 dB allowed on the primary to keep that mirror reasonably small. The moving-mirror scan is then tested by recomputing the propagated beam at the extremes of stroke; the Mizugushi-Dragone telescope geometry is what suppresses the cross-polarisation and astigmatism that such offsets would otherwise excite.

What would settle it

Measure the 90 GHz far-field pattern and per-mirror spillover of the actual multimode feedhorn in the cryogenic breadboard, and compare with the predicted under-0.2% FTS loss, under-7.5% total loss, ±0.1° depointing, and ≤0.5 dB directivity variation over a ±10 mm stroke; if the measured losses or beam shifts exceed these bounds, the monomode-Gaussian assumption is the point of failure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the BISOU optical concept, a five-mirror polarising Fourier-transform spectrometer with a direct view of the internal 2.7 K reference and a Gregorian telescope tuned to the Mizugushi-Dragone condition, performs acceptably at the low end of its band. The 90 GHz Gaussian beam, launched from a horn with a 9 mm waist, is kept at a −35 dB edge taper on FTS mirrors and −20 dB on the primary, so diffraction and spillover stay under control: the FTS loses under 0.2% of the power up to its first mirror and the entire chain loses under 7.5%. As the moving mirrors travel through a ±10 mm stroke, the peak beam direction moves by less than ±0.1°, the beam remains Gaussian, and directivity drops by no more than 0.5 dB at the +10 mm extreme. Because the science signal is a part-per-million-level deviation in sky brightness, a configuration whose losses are small, stable, and mostly independent of mirror position makes the measurement feasible.

Load-bearing premise

Every quantitative result rests on treating the instrument's multimode feedhorns as monomode Gaussian beams with a fixed 9 mm waist at 90 GHz, so a real horn whose radiation pattern differs could change the spillover, beam shape, and pointing numbers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At the nominal ±2.5 mm stroke needed for the 15 GHz resolution, the spillover and pointing effects will be even smaller than the simulated extremes, so the design has margin.
The five-mirror FTS with the reference imaged by the first mirror reduces optical mass while preserving the interferometric signal, which helps fit the instrument inside a standard balloon gondola.
A beam whose direction changes by less than 0.1° across a scan provides a well-defined line of sight that can be calibrated in post-processing, so mirror motion should not dominate systematic errors.
The small but visible asymmetry between the +10 mm and −10 mm spillover paths shows where future work on mirror shapes and alignment tolerances should focus.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the real multimode horn has a broader radiation pattern, the 7.5% spillover budget may grow; replacing the Gaussian source with a measured multimode pattern in the same physical-optics setup is a direct test of whether the mirrors stay large enough.
The ±0.1° pointing shift and 0.5 dB directivity swing over the scan can be turned into an empirical calibration: a short preflight scan could map beam centroid versus mirror position, letting the data pipeline remove scan-synchronous gain modulations.
The asymmetry between positive and negative strokes hints at a residual third-order aberration from the mirror surfaces; if it appears in breadboard measurements, an asymmetric tolerance or a slight refocus could cancel it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the short version: this is a serviceable optical concept study for the BISOU balloon FTS, useful for the Phase A and for instrument colleagues, but it is not a scientific breakthrough. The specific configuration is new for BISOU: a five-mirror FTS with a parabolic M5 to collimate on the dichroic, a Mizugushi-Dragone Gregorian telescope to kill cross-polarization, and a dichroic split of the band. Those choices are sensible and the paper explains them clearly. The GRASP physical-optics work at 90 GHz is appropriate for the diffraction-limited regime, and the reported beam stability (±0.1° pointing, <0.5 dB directivity loss across ±10 mm stroke) is encouraging, with a noted asymmetry that is worth following up.

The soft spots are two. First, Section 2 has a clean arithmetic error: the text says OPD = 4z, but then claims a 2 cm OPD needs only ±2.5 mm stroke. With OPD = 4z, ±2.5 mm gives 1 cm OPD and Δν = 30 GHz, not the stated 15 GHz. The "four times the required stroke" framing for ±10 mm is off by a factor of two — it's either two times the correctly computed stroke or four times the incorrect one. That does not invalidate the optical results, but it is precisely the kind of error that has to be corrected before design decisions are locked in.

The more substantive concern is the monomode Gaussian feed. The paper is honest that BISOU will use multimode feedhorns and that they model them as a single Gaussian with a 9 mm waist at 90 GHz. All the headline numbers — <0.2% FTS spillover, <7.5% total, <±0.1°, <0.5 dB — are outputs of that idealized source. Multimode horns generally produce broader or differently shaped patterns, and higher-order modes change the edge taper on M1 and the primary, so the absolute spillover numbers are not yet the instrument's numbers. The authors flag this and promise future work, which is fair, but it means the central quantitative claims are conditional.

The citation pattern seems honest, drawing on PIXIE and the earlier BISOU design paper. No code or optical prescription is included, so independent reproduction is limited, though the method is standard.

Overall, this is a paper for instrument people, not cosmologists. It deserves a serious referee — it is not a desk reject — but the referee should require the OPD fix and at least a note (or better, a quick multimode sensitivity run) before accepting the numbers as design drivers.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents an optical concept model for BISOU, a balloon-borne polarizing Fourier-transform spectrometer for CMB spectral-distortion measurements. The authors describe a five-mirror FTS fed by a Mizugushi-Dragone telescope, use Zemax ray tracing for the layout, and then use GRASP physical-optics simulations with a 9 mm-waist Gaussian beam at 90 GHz to evaluate spillover and beam stability as the FTS moving mirrors are displaced. The headline results are that FTS spillover is below 0.2% and total system spillover below 7.5% at the nominal mirror position, and that at ±10 mm stroke the beam stays within ±0.1° of the nominal axis with a maximum directivity loss of 0.5 dB relative to the nominal position. The paper concludes that the optical concept is promising and defers multimode-feedhorn modelling and breadboard measurements to future work.

Significance. The study is a useful preliminary validation of the BISOU optical layout and an honest account of a modelling chain that can be extended. Its main strengths are the clear statement of the modelling assumptions, the use of standard simulation tools, and the explicit admission that the multimode feedhorns of the real instrument are not yet modelled. If the quoted spillover and beam-stability numbers survive a realistic multimode feed treatment, they support the feasibility of the proposed optical concept; as they stand, they are conditional single-mode estimates rather than final performance predictions. The work is appropriate for a conference/proceedings audience, but the quantitative conclusions need to be either re-scoped or backed by additional modelling before they can be used as instrument-level requirements.

major comments (2)

[Section 2, Eqs. (1)-(2)] Section 2 states that a mirror displacement z produces an optical path difference of δ=4z and that, for the target resolution Δν=15 GHz, the required OPDmax=2 cm corresponds to a total mirror stroke of ±2.5 mm. This is inconsistent: if δ=4z, a 2 cm OPD requires z=5 mm, i.e. a ±5 mm stroke, while ±2.5 mm gives OPDmax=1 cm and Δν=30 GHz. The subsequent statement that the explored ±10 mm stroke is 'four times the stroke required' therefore needs to be re-derived; as written the explored stroke is either four times a 2.5 mm stroke (with an OPD consistent with 30 GHz resolution) or twice a 5 mm stroke (with the stated δ=4z relation). Please correct the OPD relation, the stroke value, or the resolution statement.
[Sections 3.2 and 4] The quantitative performance claims in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 — <0.2% FTS spillover, <7.5% total spillover, <±0.1° depointing, and <0.5 dB directivity loss — are all computed with a monomode Gaussian feed of 9 mm waist at 90 GHz, while the instrument is designed to use multimode feedhorns. As the paper acknowledges in Section 3.2, the real horn pattern will differ; multimode patterns are typically wider and frequency-dependent, so the edge tapers, spillover, and beam-wander behaviour could change. The current wording of Section 4.2 presents these numbers as properties of the optical system rather than of the Gaussian model used. I would like to see either a multimode-feed simulation, or a clear re-framing of Section 4 as a preliminary single-mode study with a sensitivity analysis (e.g., varying the waist or edge taper) demonstrating that the conclusions are robust. This is load-bearing because the central claim is that the BISOU optical concept meets its performance targets.

minor comments (4)

[Section 2] The symbol δ is used both for the optical path difference (δ=4z) and for the sampling interval in Eq. (2); please use a different symbol for one of them to avoid ambiguity.
[Section 3.2] The statement that a -35 dB edge taper 'ensures that 98% of the beam power is contained' appears inconsistent with the standard Gaussian-beam calculation, which gives well above 99.9% contained power for a -35 dB power edge taper; please check the value or the definition of edge taper used.
[Section 4.2] The maximum directivity loss is quoted only for the +10 mm position; for completeness, give the corresponding value at -10 mm or state explicitly that it is the same within the quoted tolerance.
[Section 4.1] The phrase 'power loss through the FTS (feed to M1)' is ambiguous; please specify the exact optical path segment and the emission/reception convention used in the simulation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning detected: the quoted spillover and beam-stability numbers are GRASP outputs from explicit Gaussian-beam inputs, not fitted parameters or self-cited conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central performance claims (FTS spillover below 0.2%, total system loss below 7.5%, depointing below ±0.1°, maximum directivity loss 0.5 dB) are presented as results of Ticra GRASP physical optics simulations. The inputs are explicitly stated: a monomode Gaussian feed with a 9 mm waist at 90 GHz, design edge tapers of -35 dB on FTS mirrors and -20 dB on the primary mirror, and a ±10 mm mirror stroke. These inputs are not derived from the quoted outputs, and the outputs are not fitted to any target spillover or beam-shape numbers; the design is optimized to edge-taper goals, and the performance numbers are then computed. No load-bearing step is justified by a self-citation: refs. [5] and [9] provide the instrument concept and science context, but the numerical optical analysis in Sections 3-4 is self-contained and uses standard tools (Zemax, GRASP, Gaussian beam theory). The stated limitation that the instrument will actually use multimode feedhorns while the present model assumes a single Gaussian beam is a modelling simplification affecting validity, not circularity. One arithmetic inconsistency appears in Section 2 (the text says OPD = 4z yet derives ±2.5 mm stroke from OPDmax = 2 cm, whereas 4 × 2.5 mm = 10 mm, not 20 mm); this is a numerical/correctness issue rather than a circular step. Because the derivation chain is a straightforward simulation from stated assumptions to computed outputs, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The design analysis uses standard optical methods and introduces no new physical entities. The main input parameters (beam waist, taper levels, stroke range) are chosen by hand rather than derived from measurements, and the monomode Gaussian representation of the multimode horn is the strongest modeling assumption.

free parameters (3)

Gaussian beam waist w0 = 9 mm at 90 GHz
Set as an approximate starting point typical at these frequencies (Section 3.2); it determines the beam divergence and all subsequent spillover numbers.
Edge taper targets = -35 dB on FTS mirrors, -20 dB on primary mirror
Hand-set design constraints (Section 3.2) that set mirror sizes and directly influence the computed power loss.
Explored mirror stroke = +/- 10 mm
Chosen as four times the stroke the text says is required, but the text's own OPD = 4z relation gives a different required stroke; the parameter choice drives the spillover and stability results.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption A monomode Gaussian beam with waist 9 mm can represent the multimode feedhorn response for the purpose of computing spillover and beam position.
Stated in Section 3.2; the paper acknowledges the horn is multimode but models it as monomode. All quantitative results depend on this.
standard math Standard Gaussian optics and the GRASP physical optics implementation are valid for 90 GHz propagation through these reflective optics.
Section 3.2 and 4 invoke standard quasi-optical theory (ref [15]); no derivation is given.
standard math Geometrical optics (ray tracing) is a valid first-order approximation for the high-frequency end of the bands.
Section 3.1; standard assumption for multi-wavelength reflective systems.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical concept model of the future cosmology project BISOU." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B7ARJWGX

@misc{pith2026260813257,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical concept model of the future cosmology project BISOU},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B7ARJWGX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13257}
}

read the original abstract

We present an optical analysis of BISOU (Balloon Interferometer for Spectral Observations of the primordial Universe), an astronomical balloon-borne pathfinder spectrometer developed as part of a preparatory study for a future space mission aiming at measuring spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The BISOU optical system is based on a differential polarizing Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) that receives inputs from both a sky-facing telescope and an internal calibration source. The FTS focal planes are equipped with bolometric detectors coupled to multimode feed horns, with distinct focal planes dedicated to the low (90 - 300GHz) and high (0.3 - 1.5THz) frequency bands. The optical analysis first relies on ray-tracing simulations to establish the overall configuration of the system, before proceeding to more advanced Gaussian beam and physical optics analyses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13257 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Cross-sectional view of the BISOU CAD model. The helium tank is visible above the cold plate, on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Top : View of the BISOU instrument with ray tracing. Bottom : A 90 GHz Gaussian beam with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: A comparison of the total instrument spillover for three different mirror positions. We chose to compute [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Simulated beam patterns on the sky for three different positions of the moving mirror. The leftmost [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Radiation patterns (magnitude in dB) as a function of the angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[1]

Calibrator Design for the COBE Far-Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS),

Mather, J. C., Fixsen, D. J., Shafer, R. A., Mosier, C., and Wilkinson, D. T., “Calibrator Design for the COBE Far-Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS),”The Astrophysical Journal512, 511–520 (Feb. 1999)

work page 1999
[2]

New horizons in cosmology with spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background,

Chluba, J., Abitbol, M. H., Aghanim, N., Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, Y., Alvarez, M., Basu, K., Bolliet, B., Burigana, C., de Bernardis, P., Delabrouille, J., Dimastrogiovanni, E., Finelli, F., Fixsen, D., Hart, L., Hern´ andez- Monteagudo, C., Hill, J. C., Kogut, A., Kohri, K., Lesgourgues, J., Maffei, B., Mather, J., Mukherjee, S., Patil, S. P., Ravenni, A., Remaze...

work page 2021
[3]

The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): mission design and science goals,

Kogut, A., Aghanim, N., Chluba, J., Chuss, D. T., Delabrouille, J., Dvorkin, C., Fixsen, D., Ghosh, S., Hensley, B. S., Hill, J. C., Maffei, B., Pullen, A. R., Rotti, A., Sabyr, A., Switzer, E. R., Thiele, L., Wollack, E. J., and Zelko, I., “The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): mission design and science goals,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle...

work page 2025
[4]

Fts for cmb spectral distortion exploration: A mission concept for the m-class esa call

Aghanim, N. and FOSSIL Collaboration, “Fts for cmb spectral distortion exploration: A mission concept for the m-class esa call.”http://www.ias.u-psud.fr/sites/default/files/FOSSIL-web_0.pdf(2022). Accessed: 2026-03-22

work page 2022
[5]

BISOU: a balloon project for spectral observations of the early universe,

Maffei, B., Aghanim, N., Aumont, J., Battistelli, E., Chluba, J., Coulon, X., De Bernardis, P., Douspis, M., Grain, J., Hill, J. C., Kogut, A., Kuruvilla, J., Lagache, G., Macias-Perez, J., Masi, S., Matsumura, T., Mele, L., Monfardini, A., O’Sullivan, C., Pagano, L., Pisano, G., Ponthieu, N., Remazeilles, M., Ritacco, A., Rotti, A., Savini, G., Sauvage, ...

work page 2022
[6]

Tentative detection of a cosmic far-infrared background with COBE.,

Puget, J.-L., Abergel, A., Bernard, J.-P., Boulanger, F., Burton, W. B., Desert, F.-X., and Hartmann, D., “Tentative detection of a cosmic far-infrared background with COBE.,”Astronomy & Astrophysics308, L5 (Apr. 1996)

work page 1996
[7]

Polarised interferometric spectrometry for the millimeter and submillimeter spectrum.,

Martin, D. H. and Puplett, E., “Polarised interferometric spectrometry for the millimeter and submillimeter spectrum.,”Infrared Physics10, 105–109 (Jan. 1970)

work page 1970
[8]

Coulon, X.,Sp´ ectroscopie du ciel : vers la mesure des distorsions spectrales du fond diffus cosmologique, PhD thesis, Universit´ e Paris-Saclay (2026)

work page 2026

Show all 15 references

[9]

Preparing future instrument to high-precision spectroscopy of the cosmic microwave background,

Coulon, X., Maffei, B., Aghanim, N., and Pagano, L., “Preparing future instrument to high-precision spectroscopy of the cosmic microwave background,” in [Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave], Coyle, L. E., Matsuura, S., and Perrin,...

2024
[10]

Ansys zemax opticstudio,

Ansys, “Ansys zemax opticstudio,” (2024)

2024
[11]

Grasp software,

TICRA, “Grasp software,” (2024)

2024
[12]

and Wolf, E., [Principles of Optics Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light] (1980)

Born, M. and Wolf, E., [Principles of Optics Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light] (1980)

1980
[13]

User manual for cnes zero pressure balloons

CNES, “User manual for cnes zero pressure balloons.”https://cnes.fr/sites/default/files/2024-07/ 7_cnes_ballons_-_user_manual_zpb_-_2018_en.pdf(2018). Accessed: 2026-03-22

2018
[14]

Offset multireflector antennas with perfect pattern symmetry and polarization discrimina- tion,

Dragone, C., “Offset multireflector antennas with perfect pattern symmetry and polarization discrimina- tion,”AT&T Technical Journal57, 2663–2684 (Sept. 1978)

1978
[15]

Goldsmith, P., [Quasioptical Systems: Gaussian Beam Quasioptical Propagation and Applications], IEEE Press series on microwave technology and techniques (1998)

1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Calibrator Design for the COBE Far-Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS),

Mather, J. C., Fixsen, D. J., Shafer, R. A., Mosier, C., and Wilkinson, D. T., “Calibrator Design for the COBE Far-Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS),”The Astrophysical Journal512, 511–520 (Feb. 1999)

work page 1999

[2] [2]

New horizons in cosmology with spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background,

Chluba, J., Abitbol, M. H., Aghanim, N., Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, Y., Alvarez, M., Basu, K., Bolliet, B., Burigana, C., de Bernardis, P., Delabrouille, J., Dimastrogiovanni, E., Finelli, F., Fixsen, D., Hart, L., Hern´ andez- Monteagudo, C., Hill, J. C., Kogut, A., Kohri, K., Lesgourgues, J., Maffei, B., Mather, J., Mukherjee, S., Patil, S. P., Ravenni, A., Remaze...

work page 2021

[3] [3]

The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): mission design and science goals,

Kogut, A., Aghanim, N., Chluba, J., Chuss, D. T., Delabrouille, J., Dvorkin, C., Fixsen, D., Ghosh, S., Hensley, B. S., Hill, J. C., Maffei, B., Pullen, A. R., Rotti, A., Sabyr, A., Switzer, E. R., Thiele, L., Wollack, E. J., and Zelko, I., “The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): mission design and science goals,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle...

work page 2025

[4] [4]

Fts for cmb spectral distortion exploration: A mission concept for the m-class esa call

Aghanim, N. and FOSSIL Collaboration, “Fts for cmb spectral distortion exploration: A mission concept for the m-class esa call.”http://www.ias.u-psud.fr/sites/default/files/FOSSIL-web_0.pdf(2022). Accessed: 2026-03-22

work page 2022

[5] [5]

BISOU: a balloon project for spectral observations of the early universe,

Maffei, B., Aghanim, N., Aumont, J., Battistelli, E., Chluba, J., Coulon, X., De Bernardis, P., Douspis, M., Grain, J., Hill, J. C., Kogut, A., Kuruvilla, J., Lagache, G., Macias-Perez, J., Masi, S., Matsumura, T., Mele, L., Monfardini, A., O’Sullivan, C., Pagano, L., Pisano, G., Ponthieu, N., Remazeilles, M., Ritacco, A., Rotti, A., Savini, G., Sauvage, ...

work page 2022

[6] [6]

Tentative detection of a cosmic far-infrared background with COBE.,

Puget, J.-L., Abergel, A., Bernard, J.-P., Boulanger, F., Burton, W. B., Desert, F.-X., and Hartmann, D., “Tentative detection of a cosmic far-infrared background with COBE.,”Astronomy & Astrophysics308, L5 (Apr. 1996)

work page 1996

[7] [7]

Polarised interferometric spectrometry for the millimeter and submillimeter spectrum.,

Martin, D. H. and Puplett, E., “Polarised interferometric spectrometry for the millimeter and submillimeter spectrum.,”Infrared Physics10, 105–109 (Jan. 1970)

work page 1970

[8] [8]

Coulon, X.,Sp´ ectroscopie du ciel : vers la mesure des distorsions spectrales du fond diffus cosmologique, PhD thesis, Universit´ e Paris-Saclay (2026)

work page 2026