Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 31 references

A pion-driven near-threshold enhancement in the $\pi\,T_{cc}$ system

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pion scattering off the $T_{cc}$ molecule predicts a near-threshold three-body enhancement near 4055 MeV.

desk verdict A clean, honest FCA calculation with a testable prediction, but the 'resonant-like structure' claim needs a pole search or a softer label before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13525 v1 pith:CS2VE4PI submitted 2026-08-13 hep-ph

Pedro Brandão , Jorgivan Morais Dias , Luciano M. Abreu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords Tcctetraquarkhadronicmoleculethree-bodyhadronFixedCenterApproximationpionscatteringDD*near-thresholdenhancementD0D0pi+pi-finalstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether an experimentally established hadronic molecule can itself act as a building block for a more complex exotic hadron. Treating the doubly charmed $T_{cc}(3875)$ as a shallow isoscalar $D D^*$ molecule, it computes pion scattering off the cluster and finds that the full $\pi D D^*$ amplitude in the $I(J^P)=1(1^-)$ channel develops a pronounced near-threshold enhancement at $M_{\rm peak}\simeq 4055$ MeV with an apparent width of about 60 MeV. Because the enhancement is produced by successive pion rescatterings and coherent pion-cluster propagation rather than by single scattering, the paper interprets it as a resonant-like three-body structure generated by the pion's active participation. If correct, the result predicts a new hadronic signal observable in the $T_{cc}\pi$ invariant-mass distribution, especially in $D^0D^0\pi^+\pi^-$ final states.

What carries the argument

The central object is the coherent Fixed Center Approximation (FCA) to the Faddeev equations for the $\pi D D^*$ system. FCA treats the molecular $T_{cc}$ as a fixed, spatially extended $D D^*$ cluster and sums the pion's successive scatterings from the two constituents; the coherent version adds propagation of the intermediate $\pi T_{cc}$ state through the propagators $G_{c1}$ and $G_{c2}$, resummed through $T_{\rm tot} = (I - T G_c)^{-1} T$. This restores exact elastic unitarity near the projectile-cluster threshold and reduces to the conventional FCA when $G_{c1}=G_{c2}=0$. The elementary $\pi D$ and $\pi D^*$ amplitudes come from unitarized chiral theory, while the cluster's extended nature enters through a form factor built from the $D D^*$ wave function; the cutoff $q_{\rm max}$ is varied over 700-1100 MeV (central 900 MeV) to define the uncertainty bands. That resummation is what moves the broad single-scattering maximum near 4100 MeV down to the near-threshold enhancement near 4055 MeV and produces the resonant-like pattern in the real and imaginary parts.

What would settle it

Measure the distribution of $\tilde T = M(D^0D^0\pi^+\pi^-) - M(D^0D^0\pi^+) - m_\pi$ near the $\pi T_{cc}$ threshold: the predicted approximately 60 MeV wide bump centered near 4055 MeV should show up roughly 45 MeV above threshold in the $T_{cc}\pi$ invariant mass. A high-statistics experiment that sees no such enhancement, or a full three-body Faddeev calculation beyond the fixed-center approximation that removes it, would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the experimentally established $T_{cc}(3875)$, treated as a shallow isoscalar $D D^*$ molecular cluster, can be promoted by a scattered pion into a heavier near-threshold three-body structure. In the $I(J^P)=1(1^-)$ channel of the $\pi D D^*$ system, the coherent Fixed Center Approximation to the Faddeev equations produces a pronounced enhancement in the full $\pi T_{cc}$ amplitude centered at $M_{\rm peak}\simeq 4055$ MeV with apparent width $\sim 60$ MeV, lying roughly 45 MeV above the $\pi T_{cc}$ threshold. The real and imaginary parts of the amplitude show the rapid variation characteristic of a resonant-like signal, and the enhancement is not present in single scattering alone: multiple scattering and coherent pion-cluster propagation move the strength toward threshold. The paper therefore concludes that the pion acts dynamically rather than as a spectator, and proposes searching for the structure in the $T_{cc}\pi$ invariant-mass distribution via the $D^0D^0\pi^+\pi^-$ final state.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rests on treating $T_{cc}$ as a predominantly shallow isoscalar S-wave $D D^*$ molecule whose internal structure stays essentially unchanged while the pion scatters; if $T_{cc}$ is not such a molecule, or if the pion distorts the cluster appreciably, the enhancement could be an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A peak near 4055 MeV with apparent width about 60 MeV should appear in the $T_{cc}\pi$ invariant-mass distribution in the $I(J^P)=1(1^-)$ channel, with the $D^0D^0\pi^+\pi^-$ final state as a natural search mode.
  • The peak sits roughly 45 MeV above the $\pi T_{cc}$ threshold, corresponding to a pion-cluster momentum of about 110 MeV and a wavelength of about 2 fm, consistent with the pion probing the molecule at hadronic length scales.
  • The near-threshold amplitude is characterized by a scattering length $a=-0.557$ fm and an effective range $r_0=(-8.56 - i\,6.68)$ fm, indicating pion-exchange-like dynamics rather than a simple two-body effect.
  • A comparison of single-scattering, conventional FCA, and coherent FCA shows the enhancement is a genuine three-body effect: the elementary $\pi D$ and $\pi D^*$ amplitudes seed the broad structure near 4100 MeV, and resummations relocate its strength toward threshold.
  • The same framework can be continued to complex energies to search for a nearby three-body pole, which would clarify whether the enhancement is a true resonance.
  • If confirmed, the result would show that an observed hadronic molecule can serve as a dynamical building block of a higher few-body configuration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive confirmation would be the observation of the predicted bump in $D^0D^0\pi^+\pi^-$ data; a null result with sufficient statistics would challenge the Fixed Center Approximation, since the central claim depends on $T_{cc}$ remaining a largely undisturbed $D D^*$ cluster during pion scattering.
  • The same coherent-FCA machinery could be applied to other established near-threshold molecules, such as $X(3872)$ or $Z_c$ states, with pions or kaons as the light projectile, predicting a family of light-meson-assisted three-body hadrons.
  • Because the paper supplies scattering length and effective range parameters, pion-$T_{cc}$ correlation functions measured in particle collisions could provide another direct experimental window on the predicted amplitude.
  • Extending the calculation beyond the fixed-center approximation, or including distortions of the $D D^*$ cluster, would test whether the near-threshold enhancement survives in a fully dynamical three-body treatment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines pion scattering off the T_cc(3875) tetraquark, treating T_cc as an isoscalar DD* molecular cluster and using the Fixed Center Approximation (FCA) with an added coherent pion-cluster resummation to compute the I(J^P)=1(1^-) three-body amplitude. The central result is that the coherent FCA amplitude, Eq. (10), develops a pronounced enhancement in |T_tot|^2 at M_peak approximately 4055 MeV with an apparent width of about 60 MeV, shifted downward from the single-scattering maximum near 4100 MeV and from the conventional FCA maximum near 4085 MeV. The authors argue that the structure of Re[T_tot] and Im[T_tot] is compatible with a resonant-like interpretation, quote effective-range parameters a = -0.557 fm and r0 = (-8.56 - 6.68i) fm, and propose searching for the enhancement in the D0 D0 pi+ pi- final state.

Significance. If the enhancement is genuine, the paper offers a concrete, experimentally accessible prediction of a hadronic molecule serving as a building block for a heavier three-body structure, and the explicit comparison of single-scattering, conventional FCA, and coherent FCA gives a clear dynamical narrative. The calculation is transparent: the resummation is given in closed form, and the authors test stability against the cluster form-factor cutoff and against an alternative two-body input. Those strengths are real. The main reservations are that no singularity/pole analysis is performed, the effective-range fit is not conclusive, and the fixed-center approximation is applied to a cluster whose binding energy is tiny compared with the momentum scale of the pion at the peak; these issues currently reduce confidence in the 'resonant-like' reading of the bump.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and discussion, Eq. (21) and Fig. 2] The central claim that the ~4055 MeV enhancement is a 'resonant-like structure' is not supported by the presented evidence because Eq. (10) is evaluated only for real sqrt(s) and no search for zeros of the denominator D(s) = 1 - t1 Gc1 - t2 Gc2 - (G0^2 - Gc1 Gc2) t1 t2, nor any second-sheet analytic continuation, is reported. A peak in |T_tot|^2 just above the pi T_cc threshold, with the accompanying rapid variation of Re[T_tot] and Im[T_tot], is exactly the pattern produced by a first-sheet branch-point (the pi T_cc threshold) combined with the energy dependence of the two-body amplitudes; the paper itself states in the Concluding remarks that the singularity structure has not been mapped. The effective-range parameters in Eq. (21), with |a| = 0.557 fm and large complex r0 = (-8.56 - 6.68i) fm, are not evidence for a nearby pole and instead suggest a threshold-dominated amplitude with a poorly convergent expansion. I ask for a complex-energy continuation of Eq. (10) with a pole/cusp discrimination, or, at minimum, replacement of 'resonant-like' by 'near-threshold enhancement' in the abstract and summary.
  2. [Coherent FCA, Eqs. (11)-(15) and Fig. 2] The validity of the frozen-cluster approximation is not established for this system. The T_cc is so weakly bound that the pi D D* breakup threshold is nearly degenerate with the pi T_cc threshold, while the pion at the peak has k_{pi T_cc} approximately 110 MeV and sits about 45 MeV above threshold; both scales are much larger than the cluster binding scale. The q_max variation in Fig. 2 only samples the form-factor cutoff of Eq. (11) and does not probe the distortion or breakup of the cluster, so the stated uncertainty bands do not cover this systematic effect. I request an estimate of breakup/inelasticity corrections (e.g., by retaining the D D* continuum or by a model estimate of the inelasticity) and a discussion of how the predicted D0 D0 pi+ pi- signal would change.
  3. [Coherent FCA, after Eq. (10)] The assertion that the coherent formulation 'restores the exact elastic-unitarity relation in the vicinity of the projectile-cluster threshold' is not justified as written, because the T_cc is not stable against breakup into D D* and the pi T_cc channel alone does not close a unitary set of channels. Please state precisely which unitarity relation is restored and under which approximations, or qualify the claim (e.g., unitarity within the pion-cluster subspace).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 2(a)] The peak position is quoted as 4055 MeV in the abstract, while the text reports a maximum near 4060 MeV for q_max = 900 MeV and a 4050-4075 MeV range; please state which value corresponds to the central parameter set and make the wording consistent.
  2. [Results, Fig. 2] The 'apparent width of approximately 60 MeV' quoted in the abstract is not defined; please specify the extraction method (e.g., full width at half maximum of |T_tot|^2) and its dependence on q_max.
  3. [Fig. 2] Panel (a) uses 'sqrt(s) [MeV]' on the horizontal axis while panels (b) and (c) appear to use 's [MeV]'; please make the axis labels identical.
  4. [Eq. (12)] The printed definition of F(q) contains a stray comma or misaligned denominator; please re-set the normalized-overlap expression for clarity.
  5. [Results and discussion, Eq. (21)] The interpretation of the complex effective range as 'characteristic of pion-exchange dynamics' is not derived or referenced; please provide a justification or remove the dynamical attribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed enhancement is an output of the coherent FCA resummation, not a refitting of its inputs.

full rationale

The central claim is that the coherent Fixed Center Approximation, Eq. (10), produces a near-threshold enhancement at M_peak ~ 4055 MeV in the pi T_cc amplitude. The inputs are (i) the pi D and pi D* amplitudes taken from the external chiral unitary works Refs. [24,25], (ii) the molecular T_cc picture taken from LHCb observations and Refs. [6-11], and (iii) the cluster form factor defined in Eqs. (11)-(12), with cutoff q_max varied as an uncertainty band. None of these inputs is fitted to the predicted peak position or width; the peak emerges from the algebraic Dyson resummation in Eq. (8)-(10). The paper explicitly tracks how the peak shifts from single scattering (~4100 MeV) through conventional FCA (~4085 MeV) to the coherent result (~4055 MeV), so the final line shape is not re-imported from the inputs by construction. The self-citations in the paper are not load-bearing: Ref. [26] defining the coherent FCA is by Ikeno and Oset, not the present authors; Ref. [28] is used only as a cross-check of the elementary amplitude and is reported not to change the findings; Ref. [31] supplies the standard effective-range formula, Eq. (17), which is then applied to the computed amplitude. The concern that no pole search or second-sheet continuation is performed is a scientific limitation about interpretation, not a circularity: the paper openly acknowledges that extending to complex energies would be needed to map the singularity structure. Thus no equation reduces to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain, and the derivation is self-contained once the stated external inputs are accepted.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The calculation is not a fit to the predicted peak: the enhancement emerges from the resummation of input amplitudes obtained in earlier chiral-unitarity works. The only parameters varied in this paper are the cluster cutoff q_max and the fixed two-body cutoff Lambda, plus the isospin-averaged masses taken from experiment.

free parameters (2)
  • q_max (cluster form-factor cutoff) = 900 MeV (central; varied 700-1100 MeV)
    Regularizes the DD* loop integral in the T_cc wave function (Eq. 11); the central peak and uncertainty bands are defined by this parameter's variation.
  • Lambda (two-body amplitude cutoff) = 1000 MeV
    Cutoff in the unitarized chiral amplitudes for pi D and pi D* from Refs. [24,25]; fixed in this paper, not fitted to the three-body result.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption T_cc is a shallow isoscalar S-wave DD* molecular cluster with I(J^P)=0(1+)
    This defines the cluster wave function and isospin recoupling; if T_cc is not molecular, the calculation basis fails. Introduced in the opening of the theory section.
  • domain assumption Fixed Center Approximation: the internal structure of the DD* cluster remains unchanged during pion scattering
    FCA ignores cluster distortion, breakup, and three-body rescattering beyond the pion-cluster intermediate states; stated explicitly in the Coherent Fixed Center Approximation section.
  • domain assumption The elementary pi D and pi D* amplitudes are accurately given by the unitarized chiral effective theory of Refs. [24,25] with Lambda=1000 MeV
    These amplitudes seed the energy dependence of the three-body result; the paper checks with Ref. [28] but otherwise relies on this input.
  • domain assumption The coherent FCA equations from Ref. [26] restore elastic unitarity and are valid for the pi T_cc system
    The Dyson resummation in Eq. (8) and the resulting amplitude Eq. (10) are taken as the correct unitarization scheme.
  • domain assumption Isospin-averaged masses and the fixed-center subenergy prescription of Eq. (6) are used
    Kinematic mapping from total sqrt(s) to subsystem energies; affects the peak location.
invented entities (1)
  • Near-threshold enhancement in the pi T_cc system (I(J^P)=1(1^-)) at ~4055 MeV independent evidence
    purpose: Predicted observable structure; if confirmed it would show a hadronic molecule acting as a building block for a heavier three-body state.
    Falsifiable via the T_cc pi invariant-mass distribution in D0 D0 pi+ pi- final states; not yet observed, and the paper does not identify a complex-energy pole, so its resonant nature is an interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A pion-driven near-threshold enhancement in the $\pi\,T_{cc}$ system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CS2VE4PI

@misc{pith2026260813525,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A pion-driven near-threshold enhancement in the $\pi\,T_cc$ system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CS2VE4PI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13525}
}
abstract

Hadronic molecules are commonly viewed as products of near-threshold two-body dynamics. We investigate whether an experimentally established molecule can also serve as a building block for a more complex exotic hadron by studying pion scattering off $T^+_{cc}(3875)$. Treating $T_{cc}$ as a correlated isoscalar $D D^*$ molecular cluster, we describe the resulting $\pi D D^*$ dynamics in the $I(J^P)=1(1^-)$ channel within the Fixed Center Approximation to the Faddeev equations. The full three-body amplitude develops a pronounced enhancement slightly above the $\pi T_{cc}$ threshold, centered at $M_{\rm peak}\simeq 4055$~MeV, with an apparent width of approximately $60$~MeV. The associated behavior of the real and imaginary parts of the amplitude is compatible with a resonant-like interpretation. These results show that the lightest hadron can play an active dynamical role in promoting an observed hadronic molecule into a building block of a heavier near-threshold structure generated by the three-body dynamics. We propose searching for this enhancement in the $T_{cc}\pi$ invariant-mass distribution, particularly through the $D^0D^0\pi^+\pi^-$ final state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13525 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Diagrammatic representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) resolves the dynamical origin of the line shape. For the central parameter set, single scattering already produces a broad maximum near 4100 MeV. Re￾summing the conventional FCA series through G0 shifts the maximum to about 4085 MeV. The coherent propaga￾tors Gc1 and Gc2 then move the strength further toward threshold and reshape it into a maximum near 4060 MeV. Varying qmax leaves this qualitative progression i… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of ex- otic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rept.1108, 1 (2025), arXiv:2404.06399 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    X. Wang, X. Liu, and Y. Gao, Colloquium: Hadron pro- duction in open-charm meson pairs at e+e- colliders, Rev. Mod. Phys.98, 021001 (2026), arXiv:2502.15117 [hep- ex]

    arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Study of the doubly charmed tetraquarkT + cc, Nature Commun.13, 3351 (2022), arXiv:2109.01056 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Study of the doubly charmed tetraquarkT + cc, Nature Commun.13, 3351 (2022), arXiv:2109.01056 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys.18, 751 (2022), arXiv:2109.01038 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys.18, 751 (2022), arXiv:2109.01038 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    X. Z. Ling, M. Z. Liu, L. S. Geng, E. Wang, and J. J. Xie, Can we understand the decay width of theT+ cc state?, Phys. Lett. B826, 136897 (2022), arXiv:2108.00947 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-heavy hadronic molecules, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 125201 (2021), arXiv:2108.02673 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    H. Ren, F. Wu, and R. Zhu, Hadronic Molecule Inter- pretation of Tcc+ and Its Beauty Partners, Adv. High Energy Phys.2022, 9103031 (2022), arXiv:2109.02531 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    Albaladejo and J

    M. Albaladejo and J. Nieves, Compositeness of S- wave weakly-bound states from next-to-leading order Weinberg’s relations, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 724 (2022), arXiv:2203.04864 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Padmanath and S

    M. Padmanath and S. Prelovsek, Signature of a Dou- bly Charm Tetraquark Pole in DD* Scattering on the Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 032002 (2022), arXiv:2202.10110 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    L. Dai, S. Fleming, R. Hodges, and T. Mehen, Strong decays of Tcc+ at NLO in an effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D107, 076001 (2023), arXiv:2301.11950 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    L. Ma, Q. Wang, and U.-G. Meißner, Double heavy tri- hadron bound state via delocalizedπbond, Chin. Phys. C43, 014102 (2019), arXiv:1711.06143 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    X.-L. Ren, B. B. Malabarba, L.-S. Geng, K. P. Khem- chandani, and A. Mart ´ ınez Torres,K∗ mesons with hid- den charm arising fromKX(3872) andKZ c(3900) dy- namics, Phys. Lett. B785, 112 (2018), arXiv:1805.08330 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    X.-L. Ren, K. P. Khemchandani, and A. Mart ´ ınez Tor- res, HeavyK ∗ mesons with open charm fromKD (∗)D∗ interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1297 (2024), arXiv:2409.16281 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Zhang, X.-Y

    Z. Zhang, X.-Y. Hu, G. He, J. Liu, J.-A. Shi, B.-N. Lu, and Q. Wang, Binding of the three-hadronDD∗Ksystem from the lattice effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D111, 036002 (2025), arXiv:2409.01325 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Pan, J.-X

    Y.-W. Pan, J.-X. Lu, E. Hiyama, L.-S. Geng, and A. Hosaka, Effect of a repulsive three-body interaction on theDD(∗)Kmolecule, Phys. Rev. D111, 114006 (2025), arXiv:2502.00438 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    L. L. Foldy, The Multiple Scattering of Waves. 1. General Theory of Isotropic Scattering by Randomly Distributed Scatterers, Phys. Rev.67, 107 (1945)

    1945

  10. [18]

    Deloff, Eta d and K- d zero energy scattering: A Fad- deev approach, Phys

    A. Deloff, Eta d and K- d zero energy scattering: A Fad- deev approach, Phys. Rev. C61, 024004 (2000)

    2000

  11. [19]

    Roca and E

    L. Roca and E. Oset, A description of the f2(1270), rho3(1690), f4(2050), rho5(2350) and f6(2510) resonances as multi-rho(770) states, Phys. Rev. D82, 054013 (2010), arXiv:1005.0283 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [20]

    V. R. Debastiani, J. M. Dias, and E. Oset, Study of theDKKandDK ¯Ksystems, Phys. Rev. D96, 016014 (2017), arXiv:1705.09257 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    J. M. Dias, V. R. Debastiani, L. Roca, S. Sakai, and E. Oset, On the binding of theBD ¯DandBDDsystems, Phys. Rev. D96, 094007 (2017), arXiv:1709.01372 [hep- ph]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. M. Dias, L. Roca, and S. Sakai, Prediction of new states fromD (∗)B(∗) ¯B(∗) three-body interactions, Phys. Rev. D97, 056019 (2018), arXiv:1801.03504 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Martinez Torres, K

    A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, L. Roca, and E. Oset, Few-body systems consisting of mesons, Few Body Syst.61, 35 (2020), arXiv:2005.14357 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Guo, P.-N

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, R.-G. Ping, and B.-S. Zou, Dynamically generated 0+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach, Phys. Lett. B641, 278 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603072

    2006 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Guo, P.-N

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, and H.-C. Chiang, Dynamically generated 1+ heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B647, 133 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610008

    2007 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ikeno and E

    N. Ikeno and E. Oset, Correlation function for thenD s0 ∗ (2317) interaction and the issue of elastic unitarity, Phys. Rev. D112, 094019 (2025), arXiv:2507.16367 [hep-ph]

    2025

  19. [27]

    Yamagata-Sekihara, L

    J. Yamagata-Sekihara, L. Roca, and E. Oset, On the nature of theK ∗ 2 (1430),K ∗ 3 (1780),K ∗ 4 (2045),K ∗ 5 (2380) andK ∗6 asK ∗ - multi-ρstates, Phys. Rev. D82, 094017 (2010), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 85, 119905 (2012)], arXiv:1010.0525 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Brand˜ ao, B

    P. Brand˜ ao, B. Agat˜ ao, L. M. Abreu, K. P. Khemchan- dani, and A. Mart ´ ınez Torres,D∗πinteraction from the lineshape ofD 1(2420) inB-decays, Phys. Lett. B878, 140527 (2026), arXiv:2512.24370 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Yamagata-Sekihara, J

    J. Yamagata-Sekihara, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Couplings in coupled channels versus wave functions in the case of resonances: application to the two Λ(1405) states, Phys. Rev. D83, 014003 (2011), arXiv:1007.3923 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Encarnaci´ on, A

    P. Encarnaci´ on, A. Feijoo, and E. Oset, Scattering observables and correlation function forpf1(1285) revisited, Phys. Rev. D113, L111502 (2026), arXiv:2603.09852 [hep-ph]. 7

    2026 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Agat˜ ao, P

    B. Agat˜ ao, P. Brand˜ ao, A. Mart ´ ınez Torres, K. P. Khem- chandani, L. M. Abreu, and E. Oset, Correlation func- tions forn ¯Ds1(2460) andn ¯Ds1(2536), Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1136 (2025), arXiv:2508.05825 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.