Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Finite-momentum superconductivity from chiral bands in twisted MoTe$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Twisted MoTe2 may superconduct at finite momentum via repulsion alone.

desk verdict Plausible and interesting zero-field finite-momentum pairing in tMoTe2, but the D=0 result is numerically under-supported and the one-valley normal state is assumed; worth refereeing hard. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.18886 v1 pith:27SVTT3N submitted 2025-06-23 cond-mat.supr-con

Yinqi Chen , Cheng Xu , Yang Zhang , Constantin Schrade This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con MSC 82D5581V7082B27 PACS 74.20.-z74.25.-q74.20.Rp
keywords finite-momentumsuperconductivitytwistedbilayerMoTe2Kohn-LuttingermechanismchiralbandssuperconductingdiodeeffectnonreciprocalmoirésuperlatticeBogoliubovFermisurface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the superconductivity recently reported in twisted bilayer MoTe2 is a finite-momentum state generated by repulsive Coulomb interactions alone, without any applied magnetic or displacement field. Assuming the normal state spontaneously breaks time-reversal symmetry so that only one valley-derived band participates in pairing, the authors build a symmetry-constrained continuum model that keeps the moiré pattern's intrinsic inversion breaking even at zero field, and use the Kohn-Luttinger mechanism—repulsion converted into attraction by screening—to show that the condensation energy is minimized at nonzero Cooper-pair momentum. If correct, tMoTe2 would be a zero-field finite-momentum superconductor, a phase previously thought to need external symmetry-breaking fields. The same state would also show a nonreciprocal quasiparticle spectrum and an intrinsic superconducting diode effect, both directly testable in transport.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a revised continuum model for twisted MoTe2 in which the interlayer hoppings $w_1$ and $w_2$ are complex numbers, chosen as $w_1=-8.4e^{-i2.4}\,\mathrm{meV}$ and $w_2=8e^{-i1.69}\,\mathrm{meV}$, so the moiré superlattice breaks inversion symmetry intrinsically. On top of it runs the Kohn-Luttinger machinery: the gate-screened Coulomb interaction $V(q)$ is dressed through RPA polarization bubbles, yielding an effective pairing kernel $g_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{k}',\mathbf{Q}}$; the self-consistent gap equation at fixed density and Cooper-pair momentum is solved, and the physical state is selected by minimizing the condensation energy $E_c$ over $\mathbf{Q}$. That minimization is what turns repulsion into a finite-momentum pairing instability and links it to the nonreciprocal Bogoliubov spectrum and diode effect.

What would settle it

A zero-field transport measurement on tMoTe2 at $\theta\approx 3.89^\circ$ and hole density near $n_h=0.368$, with current along the predicted Cooper-pair momentum, should show an asymmetric current–voltage curve under voltage reversal; a symmetric curve would rule out the finite-momentum state. As a computational check, a fully self-consistent calculation that allows pairing in both valleys—without assuming one active valley—would show whether the finite-momentum state is the global minimum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a chiral moiré band alone—through the complex phase of interlayer tunneling, which breaks inversion symmetry even at D=0—can stabilize Cooper pairs with finite center-of-mass momentum. Starting from a normal state that already breaks time-reversal symmetry so that only the band $\xi_{\mathbf{k},+}\equiv\xi_{\mathbf{k}}$ participates, the authors solve the mean-field gap equation with a gate-screened Coulomb interaction dressed at the RPA level. The condensation energy $E_c=F-F_N$ is minimized at $\mathbf{Q}=(0.014,0.008)\,\mathrm{nm}^{-1}$ at $D=0$ and at $\mathbf{Q}=(0.567,0.328)\,\mathrm{nm}^{-1}$ at $D=5\,\mathrm{meV}$, each with two $C_3$-related partners. The order parameter $\Delta_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{Q}}$ carries a $(k_x+ik_y)$-like phase winding, and the Bogoliubov spectrum is asymmetric under $\mathbf{k}\to-\mathbf{k}$ except along one mirror direction, producing Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces and a forward/reverse critical-current asymmetry—an intrinsic superconducting diode effect at zero field.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the normal state already breaks time-reversal symmetry, so pairing involves only one of the two valley-derived bands; if both valleys pair instead, the finite-momentum instability and the diode effect need not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At zero displacement field and the hole density near the DOS peak, tMoTe2 should be a finite-momentum superconductor with $\mathbf{Q}\approx(0.014,0.008)\,\mathrm{nm}^{-1}$ and two $C_3$-related equivalent momenta.
  • The superconducting state should show nonreciprocal transport: an asymmetric current–voltage curve along the Cooper-pair momentum direction and a symmetric one perpendicular to it, detectable in normal-metal–superconductor junctions.
  • The state should exhibit Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces at finite displacement field, observable as an enhanced zero-energy density of states in conductance measurements.
  • Increasing the displacement field to about 5 meV should shift the global condensation-energy minimum toward the $\kappa'$ point and enlarge $\mathbf{Q}$ to about $(0.567,0.328)\,\mathrm{nm}^{-1}$, enhancing the nonreciprocity and diode effect.
  • A nonzero diode efficiency should appear with no magnetic field, with narrow angular peaks at zero displacement field and broader lobes near the 30°, 90°, and 150° directions at finite displacement field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The same combination—complex interlayer hopping plus a valley-polarized normal state—could produce zero-field finite-momentum pairing in other chiral moiré TMDs, making the mechanism a general design rule rather than a MoTe2-specific accident.
  • Editorial inference: The angular structure of the predicted diode efficiency suggests an engineering lever: aligning a junction's current direction with the 30°, 90°, or 150° lobes at finite displacement field should maximize rectification, a testable device-level optimization.
  • Editorial inference: If the self-consistency calculation is relaxed to allow both valleys to pair, the finite-momentum state may compete with intervalley pairing; the experimental signature to look for would be a sudden change in diode sign or a re-entrant normal region as the displacement field is tuned.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Kohn-Luttinger mechanism for finite-momentum superconductivity in twisted bilayer MoTe2. Starting from a DFT-constrained continuum model with complex interlayer hoppings that break inversion even at zero displacement field, the authors solve RPA-dressed BCS-type self-consistency equations for a single active valley band, minimize the condensation energy over Cooper-pair momentum Q, and analyze the Bogoliubov spectrum, Fermi surface, and supercurrent diode effect. They report the condensation-energy minimum at Q=(0.014,0.008) nm^-1 for D=0 and at Q=(0.567,0.328) nm^-1 for D=5 meV, and attribute the zero-field finite-momentum pairing solely to internal moir\'e symmetry breaking.

Significance. If established, the result would provide a previously missing microscopic route to zero-field finite-momentum superconductivity in moir\'e TMDs, with concrete experimental signatures: asymmetric tunneling conductance along Q and characteristic angular lobes of the diode efficiency. The strengths of the paper are its first-principles-constrained normal-state model (including complex phases that break inversion at D=0), the fully self-consistent mean-field treatment with an RPA kernel, and a symmetry-based explanation of the nonreciprocal Bogoliubov spectrum. The central novelty\u2014its differentiation from the gating-field study in Ref. [38]\u2014rests on the D=0 minimum, and that result is not yet backed by the numerical evidence reported in the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Superconductivity section and Fig. 2(a)] The zero-field finite-momentum minimum is not shown to be a genuine minimum rather than a grid artifact. The reported Q=(0.014,0.008) nm^-1 is about one percent of the plotted q range; no value of Ec(Qmin)-Ec(0), no Q-grid spacing, and no k-mesh or reciprocal-lattice truncation convergence study are provided. Since the D=0 inversion breaking is weak (complex phases in w1,w2), the energy surface near gamma is expected to be very flat, so the offset could easily be the numerically nearest grid point to gamma. Please add a convergence analysis in Q and in the momentum-space discretization, and report the condensation-energy difference between the claimed minimum and Q=0; without this, the abstract's 'solely from internal symmetry breaking' claim is not supported.
  2. [Superconductivity section, first paragraph] The one-valley assumption is load-bearing but not derived. The paper assumes time-reversal symmetry is spontaneously broken in the normal state so that only xi_{k,+} participates in pairing. If both valleys remain active, pairing is naturally intervalley at Q=0 and the chiral finite-momentum instability and diode effect need not survive. The anomalous Hall effect is only circumstantial evidence for a one-valley pairing channel. Please provide a microscopic derivation of, or a controlled argument for, the one-valley normal state (for example a Hartree-Fock analysis), or explicitly recast the main claims as conditional on this assumption and discuss how the results would change under two-valley pairing.
  3. [Supplemental Material, Fig. 6] The DFT fit shown is for theta=3.15 degrees, whereas all main-text results use theta=3.89 degrees. The manuscript does not state whether the continuum parameters were re-fitted at 3.89 degrees or simply transferred. Since the moir\'e length and band widths change with twist angle, this transfer must be justified or the fit repeated at the experimental angle.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption and main text] The text says 'Two example plots of the Bogoliubov spectrum are shown in Fig. 3', but Fig. 3 shows the order parameter; the spectrum is in Fig. 4. Please fix the cross-reference.
  2. [Introduction] The sentence 'From these findings raise many fundamental questions arise' is ungrammatical and should be rewritten.
  3. [Conclusion] The phrase 'a superconducting state with a possible spin-polarized chiral superconducting was realized experimentally observed' is garbled; please revise it for clarity.
  4. [Superconducting diode effect] The phrase 'effect effect' is duplicated in the opening sentence; remove the duplicate.
  5. [Normal-state model description] The main text says the lattice 'retains only a twofold rotational symmetry about the y-axis (C2y)', but the Supplemental Material states the space group is P321, whose point group contains both C2y and C3z; please harmonize the wording.
  6. [Normal-state parameters] The list (phi1,V1,w1,V2,w2) gives no error bars or comparison with prior continuum models; please add a table with the DFT fit quality and, if possible, the sensitivity of the pairing results to these parameters.
  7. [Fig. 1(c) caption] The caption uses nh values without units; please state that they are holes per moir\'e cell.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the finite-momentum superconducting state is obtained by minimizing a computed condensation energy, not by fitting or importing the target result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The normal-state continuum model is fitted to DFT band structures, and the superconducting parameters are not fitted to any superconductivity data; the paper states that "the realized order parameter is then found by minimizing the condensation energy Ec = F − FN", so the finite Cooper-pair momentum Q is a variational output, not an input. The RPA-dressed interaction in Eq. (3) is cited to the authors' own Ref. [32], but it is a standard RPA expression with stated assumptions and does not encode the finite-momentum result; likewise the diode-effect framework from Ref. [47] is a general formalism from another material, not a fit to this calculation. The assumption of a spontaneously time-reversal-broken normal state with a single active valley is explicitly stated as an assumption, not derived, so it is a scope condition rather than a circular step. The possible numerical fragility of the zero-field minimum at Q=(0.014,0.008) nm−1 is a convergence-robustness concern about the numerical minimization, not a circularity: the paper does not define Q through the model inputs, and no equation reduces the predicted Q to a fitted parameter or to the RPA/diode citations. No circular step can be exhibited from the text.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The finite-momentum state is an output of the calculation; the inputs that carry the load are a DFT-fitted band model with complex interlayer hopping, an assumed time-reversal-broken one-valley normal state, and RPA plus mean-field approximations. The least supported input is the single active valley assumption, since the anomalous Hall effect motivates but does not prove that only one valley band pairs.

free parameters (8)
  • moiré potential amplitude V1 = 8.3 meV
    Fitted to DFT band structure for tMoTe2; controls band dispersion and density-of-states peak.
  • moiré potential phase phi1 = -81.0 degrees
    Fitted to DFT; the phase determines inversion-breaking details of the intra-layer potential.
  • interlayer tunneling w1 = -8.4 exp(-i 2.4) meV
    Complex value fitted to DFT; its phase is the source of intrinsic inversion breaking at D=0 and drives the finite momentum.
  • second-star potential V2 = 5 meV
    Fitted to DFT; second-star moiré potential amplitude.
  • second-star interlayer tunneling w2 = 8 exp(-i 1.69) meV
    Complex value fitted to DFT; its phase contributes to inversion breaking and to the diode effect at D=0.
  • gate distance d = 10 nm
    Chosen screening length for the gate-screened Coulomb potential; affects interaction strength and the superconducting scale.
  • dielectric permittivity epsilon = 5 epsilon0
    Chosen dielectric constant; affects the bare interaction and RPA kernel.
  • numerical temperature T = not stated
    The mean-field equations use beta=1/(kBT) but the paper does not specify T; without it the reported gap and condensation energies are not fully reproducible.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The normal state has spontaneously broken time-reversal symmetry, and only the xi_{k,+} valley band participates in pairing.
    Stated at the start of the Superconductivity section; motivated by the anomalous Hall effect in the experiment, not derived within the paper. If pairing involves both valleys, the finite-momentum conclusion may not follow.
  • domain assumption The continuum model with complex interlayer hopping, fitted to DFT, faithfully captures the low-energy bands including the inversion splitting along Gamma-M.
    The band model is fitted to PBE DFT at theta=3.15 degrees in the Supplemental Material, while the superconducting calculation uses theta=3.89 degrees with representative parameters; transferability of the fitted phases w1,w2 to the experimental twist angle is assumed.
  • domain assumption RPA screening and single-band mean-field decoupling describe the pairing instability.
    The RPA-dressed interaction of Eq. (3) and the Cooper-channel mean-field of Eq. (5) are standard approximations; no benchmark against exact or diagrammatic results is provided.
  • domain assumption Minimizing the mean-field condensation energy E_c over Cooper-pair momentum Q selects the realized superconducting state.
    The paper assumes the global minimum of E_c(Q) is the physical state and ignores fluctuations, competing orders, or multiple-Q coexistence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Finite-momentum superconductivity from chiral bands in twisted MoTe$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/27SVTT3N

@misc{pith2026250618886,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Finite-momentum superconductivity from chiral bands in twisted MoTe$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/27SVTT3N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.18886}
}
abstract

A recent experiment has reported unconventional superconductivity in twisted bilayer MoTe$_2$, emerging from a normal state that exhibits a finite anomalous Hall effect -- a signature of intrinsic chirality. Motivated by this discovery, we construct a continuum model for twisted MoTe$_2$ constrained by lattice symmetries from first-principles calculations that captures the moir\'{e}-induced inversion symmetry breaking even in the absence of a displacement field. Building on this model, we show that repulsive interactions give rise to finite-momentum superconductivity via the Kohn-Luttinger mechanism in this chiral moir\'{e} system. Remarkably, the finite-momentum superconducting state can arise solely from internal symmetry breaking of the moir\'{e} superlattice, differentiating it from previously studied cases that require external fields. It further features a nonreciprocal quasiparticle dispersion and an intrinsic superconducting diode effect. Our results highlight a novel route to unconventional superconducting states in twisted transition metal dichalcogenides moir\'{e} systems, driven entirely by intrinsic symmetry-breaking effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.18886 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Band structure of tMoTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Condensation energy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Magnitude of the superconducting order param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Quasiparticle dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The black line represents the band structure calculated from the continuum model, while the dashed line corresponds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Field-free Superconducting Diode Effect and Topological Fulde-Ferrell Superconductivity in Altermagnetic Shiba Chains

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A helical magnetic adatom chain on an s-wave superconductor plus a d-wave altermagnet is predicted to host a topological Fulde-Ferrell superconducting phase with Majorana end states and a field-free superconducting di...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [32]

    C. Xu, N. Zou, N. Peshcherenko, A. Jahin, T. Li, S.-Z. Lin, and Y. Zhang, Chiral superconductivity from spin polarized chern band in twisted mote 2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07082 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  2. [47]

    Y. Chen, M. S. Scheurer, and C. Schrade, Intrinsic su- perconducting diode effect and nonreciprocal supercon- ductivity in rhombohedral graphene multilayers (2025), 2503.16391, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16391

    arXiv 2025

  3. [38]

    J.-X. Hu, A. Daido, Z.-T. Sun, Y.-M. Xie, and K. Law, Layer pseudospin superconductivity in twisted mote 2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12767 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  4. [1]

    D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, L. Xian, A. Georges, A. J. Millis, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, D. Basov, A. N. Pa- supathy, and A. Rubio, Moir´ e heterostructures as a condensed-matter quantum simulator, Nature Physics 17, 155 (2021)

    2021

  5. [2]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Semiconductor moir´ e materials, Nature Nanotechnology 17, 686 (2022)

    2022

  6. [3]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, Hub- bard model physics in transition metal dichalcogenide moir´ e bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026402 (2018)

    2018

  7. [4]

    Zhang, N

    Y. Zhang, N. F. Q. Yuan, and L. Fu, Moir´ e quantum chemistry: Charge transfer in transition metal dichalco- genide superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 102, 201115 (2020)

    2020

  8. [5]

    Y. Tang, L. Li, T. Li, Y. Xu, S. Liu, K. Barmak, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, J. Shan, et al., Simulation of hubbard model physics in wse 2/ws2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 353 (2020)

    2020

Show all 97 references
  1. [6]

    Ghiotto, E.-M

    A. Ghiotto, E.-M. Shih, G. S. Pereira, D. A. Rhodes, B. Kim, J. Zang, A. J. Millis, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, et al., Quantum criticality in twisted transi- tion metal dichalcogenides, Nature 597, 345 (2021)

    2021

  2. [7]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, L. Li, Y. Zhang, K. Kang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Chowdhury, L. Fu, et al., Continuous mott transition in semiconductor moir´ e su- perlattices, Nature 597, 350 (2021)

    2021

  3. [8]

    Y. Xu, K. Kang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, A tunable bilayer hubbard model in twisted wse2, Nature nanotechnology 17, 934 (2022)

    2022

  4. [9]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. Bakti Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yu- migeta, et al., Mott and generalized wigner crystal states in wse2/ws2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 359 (2020)

    2020

  5. [10]

    H. Li, S. Li, E. C. Regan, D. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Kahn, K. Yumigeta, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al., Imaging two-dimensional generalized wigner crys- tals, Nature 597, 650 (2021)

    2021

  6. [11]

    C. Jin, Z. Tao, T. Li, Y. Xu, Y. Tang, J. Zhu, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, et al., Stripe phases in wse2/ws2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature Materials 20, 940 (2021)

    2021

  7. [12]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. De- vakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, et al., Quan- tum anomalous hall effect from intertwined moir´ e bands, Nature 600, 641 (2021)

    2021

  8. [13]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, et al., Observa- tion of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Na- ture 622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  9. [14]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, et al., Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer mote2, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  10. [15]

    K. Kang, B. Shen, Y. Qiu, Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Evidence of the fractional quantum spin hall effect in moir´ e mote2, Nature 628, 522 (2024). 6

    2024

  11. [16]

    Y. Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse2, Nature 637, 833 (2025)

    2025

  12. [17]

    Y. Guo, J. Pack, J. Swann, L. Holtzman, M. Cothrine, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. G. Mandrus, K. Barmak, J. Hone, et al., Superconductivity in 5.0 ° twisted bilayer wse2, Nature 637, 839 (2025)

    2025

  13. [18]

    Schrade and L

    C. Schrade and L. Fu, Nematic, chiral, and topological superconductivity in twisted transition metal dichalco- genides, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035143 (2024)

    2024

  14. [19]

    A. V. Chubukov and C. M. Varma, Quantum critical- ity and superconductivity in twisted transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014507 (2025)

    2025

  15. [20]

    Zhu, Y.-Z

    J. Zhu, Y.-Z. Chou, M. Xie, and S. Das Sarma, Super- conductivity in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Phys. Rev. B 111, L060501 (2025)

    2025

  16. [21]

    Christos, P

    M. Christos, P. M. Bonetti, and M. S. Scheurer, Ap- proximate symmetries, insulators, and superconductivity in continuum-model description of twisted wse 2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02393 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  17. [22]

    Guerci, D

    D. Guerci, D. Kaplan, J. Ingham, J. Pixley, and A. J. Mil- lis, Topological superconductivity from repulsive interac- tions in twisted wse 2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16075 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Tuo, M.-R

    C. Tuo, M.-R. Li, Z. Wu, W. Sun, and H. Yao, Theory of topological superconductivity and antiferromagnetic cor- related insulators in twisted bilayer wse 2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06779 (2024)

    2024

  19. [24]

    Qin, W.-X

    W. Qin, W.-X. Qiu, and F. Wu, Kohn-luttinger mech- anism of superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse 2: Gate-tunable unconventional pairing symmetry, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16114 (2024)

    2024

  20. [25]

    Fischer, L

    A. Fischer, L. Klebl, V. Cr´ epel, S. Ryee, A. Rubio, L. Xian, T. O. Wehling, A. Georges, D. M. Kennes, and A. J. Millis, Theory of intervalley-coherent afm order and topological superconductivity in twse 2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14296 (2024)

    2024

  21. [26]

    Wietek, J

    A. Wietek, J. Wang, J. Zang, J. Cano, A. Georges, and A. Millis, Tunable stripe order and weak superconduc- tivity in the moir´ e hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043048 (2022)

    2022

  22. [27]

    Klebl, A

    L. Klebl, A. Fischer, L. Classen, M. M. Scherer, and D. M. Kennes, Competition of density waves and super- conductivity in twisted tungsten diselenide, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012034 (2023)

    2023

  23. [28]

    F. Xie, L. Chen, S. Sur, Y. Fang, J. Cano, and Q. Si, Su- perconductivity in twisted wse 2 from topology-induced quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136503 (2025)

    2025

  24. [29]

    S. Kim, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, X. Wang, and D. Chowdhury, Theory of correlated insulators and su- perconductor at ν= 1 in twisted wse 2, Nature Commu- nications 16, 1701 (2025)

    2025

  25. [30]

    Zhu, Y.-Z

    J. Zhu, Y.-Z. Chou, Y. Huang, and S. D. Sarma, In-plane magnetic field-induced orbital fflo supercon- ductivity in twisted wse 2 homobilayers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18946 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  26. [31]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, et al., Signa- tures of unconventional superconductivity near reentrant and fractional quantum anomalous hall insulators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06972 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Z. D. Shi and T. Senthil, Anyon delocalization transitions out of a disordered fqah insulator (2025), 2506.02128

    2025 arXiv

  28. [34]

    P. A. Nosov, Z. Han, and E. Khalaf, Anyon superconduc- tivity and plateau transitions in doped fractional quan- tum anomalous hall insulators (2025), 2506.02108

    2025 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Huang, S

    Y. Huang, S. Musser, J. Zhu, Y.-Z. Chou, and S. D. Sarma, Apparent inconsistency between streda for- mula and hall conductivity in reentrant integer quan- tum anomalous hall effect in twisted mote 2 (2025), 2506.10965

    2025

  30. [36]

    Guerci, A

    D. Guerci, A. Abouelkomsan, and L. Fu, From fraction- alization to chiral topological superconductivity in flat chern band (2025), 2506.10938

    2025

  31. [37]

    Zhang, Holon metal, charge-density-wave and chi- ral superconductor from doping fractional chern insulator and su(3)1 chiral spin liquid (2025), 2506.00110

    Y.-H. Zhang, Holon metal, charge-density-wave and chi- ral superconductor from doping fractional chern insulator and su(3)1 chiral spin liquid (2025), 2506.00110

    2025

  32. [39]

    Zhang, C

    X.-W. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Fan, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Polarization-driven band topology evolution in twisted mote2 and wse2, Nature Communications 15, 4223 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological insulators in twisted transi- tion metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  34. [41]

    C. Xu, J. Li, Y. Xu, Z. Bi, and Y. Zhang, Maximally lo- calized wannier functions, interaction models, and frac- tional quantum anomalous hall effect in twisted bilayer mote2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2316749121 (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    N. Mao, C. Xu, J. Li, T. Bao, P. Liu, Y. Xu, C. Felser, L. Fu, and Y. Zhang, Transfer learning relaxation, elec- tronic structure and continuum model for twisted bilayer mote2, Communications Physics 7, 262 (2024)

    2024

  36. [43]

    Y. Jia, J. Yu, J. Liu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z. Qi, H. Pi, N. Regnault, H. Weng, B. A. Bernevig, and Q. Wu, Moir´ e fractional chern insulators. i. first-principles calculations and continuum models of twisted bilayer mote 2, Phys. Rev. B 109, 205121 (2024)

    2024

  37. [44]

    Kohn and J

    W. Kohn and J. Luttinger, New mechanism for super- conductivity, Physical Review Letters 15, 524 (1965)

    1965

  38. [45]

    A. V. Chubukov, Kohn-luttinger effect and the instabil- ity of a two-dimensional repulsive fermi liquid at t= 0, Physical Review B 48, 1097 (1993)

    1993

  39. [46]

    Davydova, M

    M. Davydova, M. Geier, and L. Fu, Nonreciprocal su- perconductivity, Science Advances 10, eadr4817 (2024), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.adr4817

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    M. K. de Azambuja and D. M¨ ockli, Axionic nonreciprocal superconductivity (2025), 2506.05550

    2025

  41. [49]

    Nadeem, M

    M. Nadeem, M. S. Fuhrer, and X. Wang, The super- conducting diode effect, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 558 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Obser- vation of superconducting diode effect, Nature 584, 373 (2020). 7

    2020

  43. [51]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, A phenomeno- logical theory of superconductor diodes, New Journal of Physics 24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    N. F. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Gu, P. Li, J. Hu, and K. Jiang, Gen- eral Theory of Josephson Diodes, Physical Review X 12, 041013 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Misaki and N

    K. Misaki and N. Nagaosa, Theory of the nonreciprocal Josephson effect, Physical Review B 103, 245302 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Davydova, S

    M. Davydova, S. Prembabu, and L. Fu, Universal Joseph- son diode effect, Science advances 8, eabo0309 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    R. S. Souto, M. Leijnse, C. Schrade, M. Valentini, G. Kat- saros, and J. Danon, Tuning the Josephson diode re- sponse with an ac current, Physical Review Research 6, L022002 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Zazunov, R

    A. Zazunov, R. Egger, T. Jonckheere, and T. Martin, Anomalous Josephson current through a spin-orbit cou- pled quantum dot, Physical Review Letters 103, 147004 (2009)

    2009

  50. [58]

    Brunetti, A

    A. Brunetti, A. Zazunov, A. Kundu, and R. Egger, Anomalous Josephson current, incipient time-reversal symmetry breaking, and Majorana bound states in in- teracting multilevel dots, Physical Review B 88, 144515 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    B. Pal, A. Chakraborty, P. K. Sivakumar, M. Davydova, A. K. Gopi, A. K. Pandeya, J. A. Krieger, Y. Zhang, M. Date, S. Ju, et al., Josephson diode effect from Cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal, Na- ture Physics 18, 1228 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, et al., Supercurrent rectifi- cation and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions, Nature Nanotechnology 17, 39 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Superconducting diode effect due to magnetochiral anisotropy in topologi- cal insulators and Rashba nanowires, Physical Review B 106, 104501 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Lotfizadeh, W

    N. Lotfizadeh, W. F. Schiela, B. Pekerten, P. Yu, B. H. Elfeky, W. M. Strickland, A. Matos-Abiague, and J. Sha- bani, Superconducting diode effect sign change in epi- taxial Al-InAs Josephson junctions, Communications Physics 7, 120 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Costa, J

    A. Costa, J. Fabian, and D. Kochan, Microscopic study of the josephson supercurrent diode effect in Josephson junctions based on two-dimensional electron gas, Physi- cal Review B 108, 054522 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Maiani, K

    A. Maiani, K. Flensberg, M. Leijnse, C. Schrade, S. Vaitiek˙ enas, and R. S. Souto, Nonsinusoidal current- phase relations in semiconductor–superconductor– ferromagnetic insulator devices, Physical Review B 107, 245415 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    R. Hess, H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Joseph- son transistor from the superconducting diode effect in domain wall and skyrmion magnetic racetracks, Physical Review B 108, 174516 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Y. Hou, F. Nichele, H. Chi, A. Lodesani, Y. Wu, M. F. Ritter, D. Z. Haxell, M. Davydova, S. Ili´ c, O. Glezakou- Elbert, et al., Ubiquitous superconducting diode effect in superconductor thin films, Physical Review Letters 131, 027001 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Kononov, G

    A. Kononov, G. Abulizi, K. Qu, J. Yan, D. Mandrus, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, One- dimensional edge transport in few-layer WTe2, Nano let- ters 20, 4228 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    R. S. Souto, M. Leijnse, and C. Schrade, Josephson Diode Effect in Supercurrent Interferometers, Physical Review Letters 129, 267702 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    Gupta, G

    M. Gupta, G. V. Graziano, M. Pendharkar, J. T. Dong, C. P. Dempsey, C. Palmstrøm, and V. S. Pribiag, Gate- tunable superconducting diode effect in a three-terminal Josephson device, Nature Communications 14, 3078 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Ciaccia, R

    C. Ciaccia, R. Haller, A. C. C. Drachmann, T. Linde- mann, M. J. Manfra, C. Schrade, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, Gate-tunable Josephson diode in proximitized InAs su- percurrent interferometers, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033131 (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    Valentini, O

    M. Valentini, O. Sagi, L. Baghumyan, T. de Gijsel, J. Jung, S. Calcaterra, A. Ballabio, J. Aguilera Servin, K. Aggarwal, M. Janik, et al., Parity-conserving Cooper- pair transport and ideal superconducting diode in planar germanium, Nature Communications 15, 169 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Greco, Q

    A. Greco, Q. Pichard, and F. Giazotto, Josephson diode effect in monolithic dc-SQUIDs based on 3D Dayem nanobridges, Applied Physics Letters 123 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    H. F. Legg, K. Laubscher, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Parity-protected superconducting diode effect in topolog- ical Josephson junctions, Physical Review B 108, 214520 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    J. J. Cuozzo, W. Pan, J. Shabani, and E. Rossi, Microwave-tunable diode effect in asymmetric SQUIDs with topological Josephson junctions, Physical Review Research 6, 023011 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Schrade and V

    C. Schrade and V. Fatemi, Dissipationless nonlinearity in quantum material josephson diodes, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 064029 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    J.-X. Lin, P. Siriviboon, H. D. Scammell, S. Liu, D. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, M. S. Scheurer, and J. I. A. Li, Zero-field superconducting diode effect in small-twist-angle trilayer graphene, Na- ture Physics 18, 1221 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    H. D. Scammell, J. Li, and M. S. Scheurer, Theory of zero-field superconducting diode effect in twisted trilayer graphene, 2D Materials 9, 025027 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    H. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, P. K. Sivakumar, C. Pasco, U. Filippozzi, S. S. P. Parkin, Y.-J. Zeng, T. McQueen, and M. N. Ali, The field-free Josephson diode in a van der Waals heterostructure, Nature 604, 653 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    N. J. Zhang, J.-X. Lin, D. V. Chichinadze, Y. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and J. Li, Angle- resolved transport non-reciprocity and spontaneous sym- metry breaking in twisted trilayer graphene, Nature Ma- terials 23, 356 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Enhanced superconduct- ing diode effect due to coexisting phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 046003 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    D´ ıez-M´ erida, A

    J. D´ ıez-M´ erida, A. D´ ıez-Carl´ on, S. Yang, Y.-M. Xie, X.- J. Gao, J. Senior, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Lu, A. P. Higginbotham, et al., Symmetry-broken Joseph- son junctions and superconducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Communications 14, ...

    2023

  74. [82]

    Hu, Z.-T

    J.-X. Hu, Z.-T. Sun, Y.-M. Xie, and K. T. Law, Joseph- son Diode Effect Induced by Valley Polarization in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Physical Review Letters 130, 8 266003 (2023)

    2023

  75. [83]

    B. E. L¨ uscher and M. H. Fischer, Superconductivity in a chern band: effect of time-reversal-symmetry breaking on superconductivity (2025), 2506.16508

    2025

  76. [84]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Hadjri, L. Shi, Z. Wu, W. Xu, Y. Yao, A. A. Cotten, O. S. Sedeh, H. Weldeyesus, et al., Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15233 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Geier, M

    M. Geier, M. Davydova, and L. Fu, Chiral and topo- logical superconductivity in isospin polarized multilayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13829 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Y.-Z. Chou, J. Zhu, and S. D. Sarma, Intravalley spin- polarized superconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06701 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Yang and Y.-H

    H. Yang and Y.-H. Zhang, Topological incommensu- rate fulde-ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov superconductor and bogoliubov fermi surface in rhombohedral tetra-layer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02503 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Qin and C

    Q. Qin and C. Wu, Chiral finite-momentum super- conductivity in the tetralayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07145 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Parra-Martinez, A

    G. Parra-Martinez, A. Jimeno-Pozo, V. T. Phong, H. Sainz-Cruz, D. Kaplan, P. Emanuel, Y. Oreg, P. A. Pantale´ on, J. A. Silva-Guill´ en, and F. Guinea, Band renormalization, quarter metals, and chiral supercon- ductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXi...

    2025

  82. [90]

    Dong and P

    Z. Dong and P. A. Lee, A controllable theory of super- conductivity due to strong repulsion in a polarized band (2025), 2503.11079

    2025

  83. [91]

    Jahin and S.-Z

    A. Jahin and S.-Z. Lin, Enhanced kohn-luttinger topolog- ical superconductivity in bands with nontrivial geometry, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09664 (2024)

    2024

  84. [92]

    Wang, Z.-Q

    Y.-Q. Wang, Z.-Q. Gao, and H. Yang, Chiral supercon- ductivity from parent chern band and its non-abelian generalization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05384 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    C. Yoon, T. Xu, Y. Barlas, and F. Zhang, Quarter metal superconductivity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17555 (2025)

    2025

  86. [94]

    May-Mann, T

    J. May-Mann, T. Helbig, and T. Devakul, How pairing mechanism dictates topology in valley-polarized super- conductors with berry curvature (2025), 2503.05697

    2025 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Christos, P

    M. Christos, P. M. Bonetti, and M. S. Scheurer, Finite- momentum pairing and superlattice superconductivity in valley-imbalanced rhombohedral graphene (2025), 2503.15471

    2025

  88. [96]

    Sedov and M

    D. Sedov and M. S. Scheurer, Probing superconductivity with tunneling spectroscopy in rhombohedral graphene (2025), 2503.12650

    2025 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Lesser, C

    O. Lesser, C. Huang, J. P. Sethna, and E.-A. Kim, Emblems of pair density waves: dual identity of topo- logical defects and their transport signatures (2025), 2506.08087. 9 Supplemental Material to ‘Finite-momentum superconductivity from chiral bands in twisted MoTe2’ Yinqi Ch...

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.