Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

AegisLLM: Scaling Agentic Systems for Self-Reflective Defense in LLM Security

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.20965 v2 pith:2BDSBAY6 submitted 2025-04-29 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords aegisllmmodelagenticdefenseunlearningattackscomparedjailbreaking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce AegisLLM, a cooperative multi-agent defense against adversarial attacks and information leakage. In AegisLLM, a structured workflow of autonomous agents - orchestrator, deflector, responder, and evaluator - collaborate to ensure safe and compliant LLM outputs, while self-improving over time through prompt optimization. We show that scaling agentic reasoning system at test-time - both by incorporating additional agent roles and by leveraging automated prompt optimization (such as DSPy)- substantially enhances robustness without compromising model utility. This test-time defense enables real-time adaptability to evolving attacks, without requiring model retraining. Comprehensive evaluations across key threat scenarios, including unlearning and jailbreaking, demonstrate the effectiveness of AegisLLM. On the WMDP unlearning benchmark, AegisLLM achieves near-perfect unlearning with only 20 training examples and fewer than 300 LM calls. For jailbreaking benchmarks, we achieve 51% improvement compared to the base model on StrongReject, with false refusal rates of only 7.9% on PHTest compared to 18-55% for comparable methods. Our results highlight the advantages of adaptive, agentic reasoning over static defenses, establishing AegisLLM as a strong runtime alternative to traditional approaches based on model modifications. Code is available at https://github.com/zikuicai/aegisllm

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research Ideas

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A randomized execution study with 43 experts shows that LLM-generated research ideas lose more of their appeal than human ideas when actually implemented, reversing part of their ideation-stage advantage.

  2. SafeFlow: Semantic Information-Flow Control for Blocking Malicious Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A workflow-level taint-propagation defense blocks fragmented malicious multi-agent workflows, cutting average attack success from 69.3% to 12.7% on four benchmarks.

  3. A Real-Time, Self-Tuning Moderator Framework for Adversarial Prompt Detection

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RTST, a two-agent moderator with an explainable Behavior ledger and per-prompt weight updates, reduced attack success rate from 12-63% to 0-17% on three jailbreak benchmarks with Gemini 2.5 Flash.

  4. A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper surveys security risks of LLM agents, organizes them into a five-level autonomy taxonomy, and proposes an untested CMDP-based architecture called R2A2.

Pith tools