Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 66 references

Iterative Sparse Asymptotic Minimum Variance Based Channel Estimation in Fluid Antenna System

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An iterative maximum-likelihood estimator reconstructs a fluid antenna's N-port channel from a small set of noisy pilot measurements, and in simulation it beats existing benchmark estimators in accuracy and bit error rate.

desk verdict A promising covariance-fitting approach to FAS channel estimation is undercut by a derivation that assumes a different model than the one the paper states. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05625 v1 pith:2FFNONFV submitted 2025-07-08 eess.SP

Zhen Chen , Jianqing Li , Xiu Yin Zhang , Kai-Kit Wong , Chan-Byoung Chae , Yangyang Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords Fluidantennasystem(FAS)channelestimationmaximumlikelihood(ML)iterativeapproachsparsespatialcorrelationEMalgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Fluid antenna systems have many possible antenna positions but only a few radio chains, so the channel across all N ports must be inferred from a small number of noisy pilot measurements. This paper argues that the estimation problem is best framed as maximum-likelihood estimation of the channel powers and noise from the observed pilot snapshots, solved by an iterative expectation-maximization-style algorithm. The proposed FAS-CHE scheme, and an enhanced variant with a tunable parameter, are shown in simulation to reconstruct the channel more accurately and with lower bit error rate than the existing SeCE, OMP-FAS, and LS-FAS benchmarks, under both the QuaDRiGa and spatially sparse clustered channel models. The paper also reports that the schemes converge within a few iterations and improve channel capacity as the number of active ports grows.

What carries the argument

The central object is the iterative ML estimator built on the covariance model $R = S\Gamma S^H + \sigma I$, where $S$ is the port-switch (dictionary) matrix, $\Gamma = \mathrm{diag}(\gamma)$ collects the per-port powers, and $\sigma$ is the noise variance. The derivation uses the matrix inversion lemma to isolate each $\gamma_m$ from the full covariance, forms a robust sample covariance $R_K$ in Eq. (20) with M-estimator weights $\kappa_k = \phi(y_k^H R^{-1} y_k)$, and updates $\gamma_m$ and $\sigma$ through the fixed-point formulas (32)-(33) with non-negativity enforced by (36)-(37). The enhanced variant introduces a regularization parameter $\rho$ in Eq. (40) that blends the ML pseudo-spectrum with a minimum variance distortionless response beamformer, which the paper says suppresses spurious noise peaks while retaining genuine secondary scatterers.

What would settle it

Implement the proposed FAS-CHE estimator exactly as specified, then replace the fixed-dictionary assumption with the per-slot switch matrices $S_k$ in the covariance model and re-solve the maximum-likelihood problem; if the per-slot version achieves lower normalized mean square error or bit error rate at the same pilot budget, the i.i.d. covariance assumption in Eqs. (8)-(10) is the scheme's limiting approximation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the N-dimensional fluid antenna channel can be estimated from KM noisy pilot observations, with KM much smaller than N, by iteratively solving a stochastic maximum-likelihood problem for the signal covariance $R = S\Gamma S^H + \sigma I$. The key updates, given in Eqs. (32)-(33) and made non-negative in Eqs. (36)-(37), refine the estimates of the per-port powers $\gamma_m$ and the noise variance $\sigma$; the enhanced version in Eq. (40) blends this ML refinement with a minimum variance distortionless response beamformer through a regularization parameter $\rho$. The authors state that the scheme exploits the spatial sparsity of the channel and the noise prior, and that simulation results confirm the highest estimation accuracy for both SSC and QuaDRiGa channels across the tested SNR range.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation treats the pilot snapshots as independent draws from one fixed covariance, even though the antenna's port-switching means the true covariance changes from slot to slot.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fluid antenna receivers can estimate the full $N$-port channel using only $M$ RF chains and $K$ pilots, with $KM \ll N$, cutting pilot overhead in 6G deployments.
  • At the same signal-to-noise ratio, the estimated channel yields lower bit error rate than the SeCE, OMP-FAS, and LS-FAS benchmarks in both the QuaDRiGa and spatially sparse clustered channel models.
  • The iterative scheme converges within a few iterations, so the accuracy gains do not come at a heavy computational cost in the simulated settings.
  • The enhanced variant's regularization knob $\rho$ lets the estimator trade spectral resolution against noise robustness, with higher $\rho$ helpful at high SNR.
  • Channel capacity grows with the number of active ports under the proposed estimator, indicating that the scheme harvests spatial diversity from the fluid antenna's reconfigurable aperture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fixed-dictionary derivation suggests a natural next step: re-deriving the updates for per-slot switch matrices $S_k$; if that per-slot maximum-likelihood version gives only marginal gains, the paper's approximation is tight, and if not, it reveals how much accuracy is left on the table.
  • The regularization parameter $\rho$ is chosen empirically; an adaptive schedule that raises $\rho$ with SNR could automatically close the gap between the basic and enhanced variants in the low-port regime.
  • Because the core estimator is a generic sparse covariance maximum-likelihood solver, it could transfer to other reconfigurable-aperture problems, such as movable antennas or RIS-assisted links, whenever a few sensors sample a larger set of candidate positions.
  • The simulations assign fixed port-selection policies to the benchmarks; jointly optimizing port selection with each estimator could narrow or widen the reported gains, and would test the scheme's port-selection advantage directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes FAS-CHE, an ML-based iterative channel estimation algorithm for a fluid antenna system (FAS) with N ports, M RF chains (M << N), and K pilot timeslots. The received model is y_k = S_k h x_k + ε_k for slot-dependent binary switch matrices S_k, and the goal is to reconstruct the N-dimensional channel h from KM noisy observations. The authors derive iterative update equations for per-source powers γ_m and noise variance σ from a complex elliptically symmetric likelihood, introduce a regularized version controlled by a parameter ρ, and evaluate the schemes against SeCE, OMP-FAS, and LS-FAS in BER and capacity simulations under QuaDRiGa and spatially sparse clustered channel models.

Significance. If the derivation and simulations were sound, the paper would address an important problem in FAS: estimating the full N-port channel from a small number of selected-port measurements. The paper covers relevant prior work, provides pseudocode, and benchmarks against several existing estimators on two channel models. However, the central derivation is inconsistent with the stated system model, and the reported experiments do not directly measure the channel estimation error that the abstract and conclusion claim. The manuscript as submitted does not provide a valid basis for its headline performance claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II-C, Eqs. (8)-(10)] The ML derivation assumes that the snapshots y_k are i.i.d. with a common N×N covariance R = SΓS^H + σI_N. This is inconsistent with the system model in Eq. (4), where y_k ∈ C^M and E[y_k y_k^H] = S_k Γ S_k^H + σI_M, which depends on k because S_k varies per timeslot. Moreover, in the stacked model (5), S is KM×N, so SΓS^H is KM×KM; adding σI_N in Eq. (8) is dimensionally valid only if KM = N, which contradicts M << N. The pdf in Eq. (9) and the likelihood in Eq. (10) therefore do not correspond to the data distribution of the stated FAS model, and all subsequent update equations solve a different, full-array fixed-dictionary problem rather than the FAS partial-observation estimation problem.
  2. [Eqs. (32)-(37) and Algorithm 1] The iterative updates estimate M coefficients γ_m together with σ, but the paper never specifies how the N-dimensional channel h is reconstructed from these parameters. Since KM << N, the inverse problem in Eq. (5) is underdetermined, and the paper does not state any mapping from (γ, σ) to h. This is load-bearing because the abstract and conclusion claim superior channel estimation accuracy; without a reconstruction of h, the estimated parameters alone do not constitute a channel estimate. The absence of any NMSE results in Section IV makes this gap particularly visible.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (40), and Fig. 7] The enhanced FAS-CHE scheme depends on a regularization parameter ρ that is selected empirically to improve BER. The text states that 'By empirically determining an appropriate value for ρ' the scheme balances refinement and generalization, and Fig. 7 reports different BER curves for ρ = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.0 without providing a criterion for choosing ρ before seeing the test results. This makes the reported 'robustness' of the enhanced scheme unfalsifiable in the presented form and weakens the claim that the proposed method outperforms benchmarks in a parameter-free manner.
  4. [Section IV, Figs. 2-7] The simulation section states that performance is evaluated by NMSE, but no NMSE results are shown; all figures report BER or channel capacity. BER and capacity are indirect indicators and do not demonstrate that the estimated channel h is more accurate than the benchmarks, which is the central claim. Without a direct comparison of reconstruction error against the ground-truth channel, the conclusion that the proposed FAS-CHE achieves 'superior channel estimation accuracy' is not supported by the presented evidence.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Algorithm 1, line 8] The pseudocode says to update R(i+1) = SΓ(i)SH + σ(i)IN according to Eq. (12), but Eq. (12) is the matrix inversion lemma; the formula on that line should refer to Eq. (8) or Eq. (34).
  2. [Eqs. (36) and (40)] The denominator in Eq. (36) uses sH_k (R^{-1})^(i) s_m, and Eq. (40) also uses sH_k, while the surrounding text and Eq. (32) use s_m; this appears to be a typographical error.
  3. [Eqs. (1) and (2)] The norm conditions on S_k are written inconsistently with the row/column description: if each row of S_k contains exactly one 1, the condition should be ∥S_k(m,:)∥_2 = 1 for each m, not ∥S_k(:,m)∥_2 = 1 as written.
  4. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption reads 'Enhance FAS-CHE, = 1.5' and similar, omitting the symbol ρ; it should read 'Enhanced FAS-CHE, ρ = 1.5'.
  5. [Section II-C] The paper repeatedly refers to an 'iterative tomographic algorithm,' but no tomography model, projection operator, or image-domain reconstruction is introduced; either the term should be defined and used consistently or removed.
  6. [Section IV] The paper mentions 'model-mismatched and model-matched scenarios' and NMSE evaluation, but the simulation setup does not define NMSE, the number of Monte Carlo trials, or the exact port selection sequence S_k used; these details should be provided for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The central FAS-CHE estimator is benchmarked externally, but the paper's headline 'Enhanced FAS-CHE' result is partly produced by fitting the regularization parameter rho to the same BER curves that are then reported as the prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III (after Eq. (40)) and Section IV, Fig. 7 discussion]
    "By empirically determining an appropriate value for rho, the enhanced FAS-CHE scheme can achieve a balance between refinement and generalization. ... Therefore, it suggests that higher rho values contribute to better BER performance, particularly for rho = 1.5."

    The enhanced estimator is defined by a one-parameter family in rho (Eq. (40)), and the paper selects rho by inspecting BER curves on the same simulation scenario (Fig. 7), then reports the resulting 'Enhance FAS-CHE' curves as the method's achieved performance in Figs. 3-5. The margin over fixed benchmarks is therefore the selected best case of a tuned family rather than the prediction of a fully specified algorithm. No separate training/validation split or pre-registered rho value is given, so the reported advantage is partially forced by fitting the evaluation metric.

full rationale

The main FAS-CHE algorithm is not circular in the strongest sense: its performance is evaluated against ground-truth QuaDRiGa and SSC channels and against external benchmarks, so the central claim is externally falsifiable rather than true by construction. The paper also does not rely on a load-bearing self-citation chain; the citations to related FAS estimation work are used as background and benchmarks, not as the justification for the algorithm's correctness. The one circular-adjacent element is the 'Enhanced FAS-CHE' variant: its distinguishing parameter rho is empirically chosen by inspecting the same BER curves that are later reported as the scheme's advantage, which is a fitted-input-called-prediction issue and partially explains the enhanced curves' superiority. Separately, and not counted as circularity, there is a serious model-consistency problem: Eq. (8) defines R = S Gamma S^H + sigma I_N while the stacked S in Eq. (5) is KM x N, so S Gamma S^H is KM x KM and adding I_N is dimensionally invalid unless KM = N; Eq. (9) then treats y_k as N-dimensional, although Eq. (4) defines y_k in C^M with time-varying S_k. This means the ML derivation and updates (32)-(37) apply to a fixed full-array dictionary model, not to the paper's stated time-varying partial-observation FAS model. That is a correctness and reproducibility flaw, not a circularity, and it is weighed here only in that it weakens the derivation behind the central claim. Overall score 4: the central estimator has independent content, but the enhanced result is partially the product of test-scenario fitting.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation depends on the sparsity assumption and on an i.i.d. common-covariance model that is not consistent with the time-varying selection in the system model. The free parameters rho, the iteration limit, and the switch sequence are unspecified or empirically tuned, making the reported gains scenario-dependent.

free parameters (3)
  • rho = 1.5 (best in Fig. 7), swept over 0.5 to 2
    The regularization parameter in Eq. (40) blends the previous power spectrum with the Capon beamformer. It is described as 'empirically determining an appropriate value', and Fig. 7 shows performance depends strongly on this choice, with no principled selection rule.
  • Nmax (maximum iterations) = not specified
    Algorithm 1 runs 'while Nmax not reached' but no convergence criterion or iteration limit is stated, affecting the exact results.
  • Port selection sequence S_k = not specified
    The switch matrices determine the observation model. The paper imposes constraints in Eqs. (1)-(3) but never specifies the actual sequence used in the simulations, which is critical to reproduce the results.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Wireless channels are sparse (inherent sparsity).
    Invoked in the introduction and Section II-C to justify the sparse covariance approach. The channel model in Eq. (6) is a clustered sparse representation in angle, but the algorithm estimates port-domain powers, so the sparsity basis is not clearly aligned.
  • domain assumption The observations y_k are i.i.d. complex elliptically symmetric (CES) with a common covariance R.
    Used to write the likelihood in Eqs. (9)-(10). This assumption is inconsistent with the time-varying switch matrix S_k in the system model, as E[y_k y_k^H] = S_k Gamma S_k^H + sigma I changes with k.
  • standard math The noise is AWGN with variance sigma.
    Stated in Eq. (4) and used throughout the derivation.
  • domain assumption The channel follows the narrowband spatially sparse clustered model of Eq. (6).
    Used to generate simulation channels. The QuaDRiGa model is used as an alternative in simulations, indicating the method is expected to work beyond this specific model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Iterative Sparse Asymptotic Minimum Variance Based Channel Estimation in Fluid Antenna System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2FFNONFV

@misc{pith2026250705625,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Iterative Sparse Asymptotic Minimum Variance Based Channel Estimation in Fluid Antenna System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2FFNONFV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05625}
}
read the original abstract

With fluid antenna system (FAS) gradually establishing itself as a possible enabling technology for next generation wireless communications, channel estimation for FAS has become a pressing issue. Existing methodologies however face limitations in noise suppression. To overcome this, in this paper, we propose a maximum likelihood (ML)-based channel estimation approach tailored for FAS systems, designed to mitigate noise interference and enhance estimation accuracy. By capitalizing on the inherent sparsity of wireless channels, we integrate an ML-based iterative tomographic algorithm to systematically reduce noise perturbations during the channel estimation process. Furthermore, the proposed approach leverages spatial correlation within the FAS channel to optimize estimation accuracy and spectral efficiency. Simulation results confirm the efficacy of the proposed method, demonstrating superior channel estimation accuracy and robustness compared to existing benchmark techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05625 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An illustration of channel estimation for an FAS, where one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Convergence performance for port selection based on the proposed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. The channel capacity versus the number of fluid antenna ports. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The channel capacity versus A/λ under the SSC model in (6). to leverage appropriate ρ value and achieve better performance under smaller port numbers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The BER of the proposed FAS-CHE scheme for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bruce Lee- inspired fluid antenna system: Six research topics and the potentials for 6G,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Shen, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Bruce Lee- inspired fluid antenna system: Six research topics and the potentials for 6G,” Frontiers Commun. and Netw., section Wireless Commun. , vol. 3, no. 853416, Mar. 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,

    W. K. New et al. , “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,” IEEE Commun. Surv. & Tut. , doi:10.1109/COMST.2024. 3498855, 2024

    doi:10.1109/comst.2024 2024

  3. [3]

    Fluid Antennas: Reshaping Intrinsic Properties for Flexible Radiation Characteristics in Intelligent Wireless Networks

    W.-J. Lu et al., “Fluid antennas: Reshaping intrinsic properties for flex- ible radiation characteristics in intelligent wireless networks,” accepted in IEEE Commun. Mag. , arXiv:2501.02911, 2025

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Performance limits of fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Performance limits of fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2469–2472, Nov. 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

    work page 1950

  6. [6]

    Liquid antennas: Past, present and future,

    Y . Huang, L. Xing, C. Song, S. Wang, and F. Elhouni, “Liquid antennas: Past, present and future,” IEEE Open J. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 2, pp. 473–487, Mar. 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Design and implementation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas and experimental results for fluid antenna multi- ple access,

    Y . Shen et al. , “Design and implementation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas and experimental results for fluid antenna multi- ple access,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2405.09663, May 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Electromagnetically reconfigurable fluid antenna system for wireless communications: Design, modeling, algorithm, fabrication, and experiment,

    R. Wang et al., “Electromagnetically reconfigurable fluid antenna system for wireless communications: Design, modeling, algorithm, fabrication, and experiment,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2502.19643v2, 2025

    arXiv 2025

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,

    J. Zhang et al. , “A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,” IEEE Open J. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 212–228, Feb. 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Antenna coding empowered by pixel antennas,

    S. Shen, K. K. Wong, and R. Murch, “Antenna coding empowered by pixel antennas,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2411.06642, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Design and synthesis of antenna array with movable elements along semicircular paths,

    S. Basbug, “Design and synthesis of antenna array with movable elements along semicircular paths,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 3059–3062, Oct. 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Be water, my antennas: Riding on radio wave fluctuation in nature for spatial multiplexing using programmable meta-fluid antenna,

    B. Liu, K. F. Tong, K. K. Wong, C.-B. Chae, and H. Wong, “Be water, my antennas: Riding on radio wave fluctuation in nature for spatial multiplexing using programmable meta-fluid antenna,” arXiv preprint , arXiv:2502.04693, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Multifunctional reconfigurable MEMS integrated antennas for adaptive MIMO systems,

    B. Cetiner et al. , “Multifunctional reconfigurable MEMS integrated antennas for adaptive MIMO systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 62–70, Dec. 2004

    2004

  6. [14]

    Maximizing MIMO capacity in sparse multipath with reconfigurable antenna arrays,

    A. M. Sayeed and V . Raghavan, “Maximizing MIMO capacity in sparse multipath with reconfigurable antenna arrays,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Sig. Process., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 156–166, Jun. 2007

    2007

  7. [15]

    Closed-form expressions for spatial correlation parameters for performance analysis of fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Closed-form expressions for spatial correlation parameters for performance analysis of fluid antenna systems,” Elect. Lett. , vol. 58, no. 11, Apr. 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    A new analytical ap- proximation of the fluid antenna system channel,

    M. Khammassi, A. Kammoun and M.-S. Alouini, “A new analytical ap- proximation of the fluid antenna system channel,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 8843–8858, Dec. 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems,

    P. Ram ´ırez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez, and K. K. Wong, “A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 15829–15843, Nov. 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Fluid antenna system: New insights on outage probability and diversity gain,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, K. F. Tong and C.-B. Chae, “Fluid antenna system: New insights on outage probability and diversity gain,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 128–140, Jan. 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    On the performance of fluid antennas systems under α-µ fading channels,

    P. D. Alvim et al., “On the performance of fluid antennas systems under α-µ fading channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 108–112, Jan. 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Copula-based performance analysis for fluid antenna systems under arbitrary fading channels,

    F. Rostami Ghadi, K. K. Wong, F. Javier L ´opez-Mart´ınez, and K. F. Tong, “Copula-based performance analysis for fluid antenna systems under arbitrary fading channels,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 3068–3072, Nov. 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    A copula-based approach to performance analysis of fluid antenna system with multiple fixed transmit antennas,

    Y . Hou et al., “A copula-based approach to performance analysis of fluid antenna system with multiple fixed transmit antennas,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 501–504, Feb. 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    A Gaussian copula approach to the performance analysis of fluid antenna systems,

    F. Rostami Ghadi et al., “A Gaussian copula approach to the performance analysis of fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 17573–17585, Nov. 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimiza- tion, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, K. F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimiza- tion, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5541–5556, Jun. 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Antenna positioning and beamforming design for fluid antenna-assisted multi-user downlink communications,

    H. Qin et al. , “Antenna positioning and beamforming design for fluid antenna-assisted multi-user downlink communications,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1073–1077, Apr. 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Sum-rate maximization for fluid antenna enabled multiuser communications,

    Z. Cheng et al. , “Sum-rate maximization for fluid antenna enabled multiuser communications,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1206–1210, May 2024. 9

    2024

  18. [26]

    Capacity maximization for FAS-assisted multiple access channels,

    H. Xu et al. , “Capacity maximization for FAS-assisted multiple access channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3516499, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Fluid antenna multiple access,

    K.-K. Wong and K.-F. Tong, “Fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 4801–4815, Jul. 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Slow fluid antenna multiple access,

    K. K. Wong, D. Morales-Jimenez, K. F. Tong, and C. B. Chae, “Slow fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 2831–2846, May 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Deep learning enabled slow fluid antenna multiple access,

    N. Waqar, K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, A. Sharples, and Y . Zhang, “Deep learning enabled slow fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 861–865, Mar. 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    cGAN-based slow fluid antenna multiple access,

    M. Eskandari, A. Burr, K. Cumanan, and K. K. Wong, “cGAN-based slow fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 10, pp 2907–2911, Oct. 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Energy-efficiency optimization for slow fluid antenna multiple access using mean-field game,

    Y . Chen, S. Li, Y . Hou, and X. Tao, “Energy-efficiency optimization for slow fluid antenna multiple access using mean-field game,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 915–918, Apr. 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Compact ultra massive antenna array: A simple open-loop massive connectivity scheme,

    K. K. Wong, C. B. Chae, and K. F. Tong, “Compact ultra massive antenna array: A simple open-loop massive connectivity scheme,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6279–6294, Jun. 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Transmitter CSI-free RIS-randomized CUMA for extreme massive connectivity,

    K. K. Wong, “Transmitter CSI-free RIS-randomized CUMA for extreme massive connectivity,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. , vol. 5, pp. 6890– 6902, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Coded fluid antenna multiple access over fast fading channels,

    H. Hong, K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, H. Shin, and Y . Zhang, “Coded fluid antenna multiple access over fast fading channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1249–1253, Apr. 2025

    2025

  27. [35]

    Downlink OFDM-FAMA in 5G-NR systems,

    H. Hong et al. , “Downlink OFDM-FAMA in 5G-NR systems,” arXiv preprint, arxiv:2501.06974, Jan. 2025

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Oppor- tunistic fluid antenna multiple access,

    K.-K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, Y . Chen, Y . Zhang, and C.-B. Chae, “Oppor- tunistic fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 7819–7833, Nov. 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Opportunistic fluid antenna multiple access via team-inspired reinforcement learning,

    N. Waqar et al. , “Opportunistic fluid antenna multiple access via team-inspired reinforcement learning,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 12 068–12 083, Sept. 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Fluid antenna system enhancing orthogonal and non-orthogonal multiple access,

    W. K. New et al. , “Fluid antenna system enhancing orthogonal and non-orthogonal multiple access,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 218–222, Jan. 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Fluid antenna enabling secret communications,

    B. Tang et al. , “Fluid antenna enabling secret communications,” IEEE Commun. Lett. . vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1491–1495, Jun. 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    Coding-enhanced cooperative jamming for secret com- munication in fluid antenna systems,

    H. Xu et al. , “Coding-enhanced cooperative jamming for secret com- munication in fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1991–1995, Sept. 2024

    1991

  33. [41]

    Physical layer security over fluid antenna systems: Secrecy performance analysis,

    F. R. Ghadi et al. , “Physical layer security over fluid antenna systems: Secrecy performance analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 18201–18213, Dec. 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    On performance of RIS-aided fluid antenna systems,

    F. Rostami Ghadi et al. , “On performance of RIS-aided fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2175–2179, Aug. 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    A first look at the performance enhancement potential of fluid recon- figurable intelligent surface,

    A. Salem, K.-K. Wong, G. Alexandropoulos, C.-B. Chae, and R. Murch, “A first look at the performance enhancement potential of fluid recon- figurable intelligent surface,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2502.17116, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Fluid antenna empowered index modulation for RIS-aided mmWave transmissions,

    J. Zhu et al., “Fluid antenna empowered index modulation for RIS-aided mmWave transmissions,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1635–1647, Feb. 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Position index modulation for fluid antenna system,

    H. Yang et al. , “Position index modulation for fluid antenna system,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16773–16787, Nov. 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Fluid antenna-aided full duplex communications: A macroscopic point-of-view,

    C. Skouroumounis and I. Krikidis, “Fluid antenna-aided full duplex communications: A macroscopic point-of-view,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2879–2892, Sept. 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Fluid antenna system liberating multiuser MIMO for ISAC via deep reinforcement learning,

    C. Wang et al. , “Fluid antenna system liberating multiuser MIMO for ISAC via deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 10879–10894, Sept. 2024

    2024

  40. [48]

    Shifting the ISAC trade-off with fluid antenna systems,

    J. Zou et al. , “Shifting the ISAC trade-off with fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3479–3483, Dec. 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    Fluid antenna-assisted ISAC systems,

    L. Zhou, J. Yao, M. Jin, T. Wu and K. K. Wong, “Fluid antenna-assisted ISAC systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3533– 3537, Dec. 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Joint port selection and beamforming design for fluid antenna assisted integrated data and energy transfer,

    L. Zhang, H. Yang, Y . Zhao, and J. Hu, “Joint port selection and beamforming design for fluid antenna assisted integrated data and energy transfer,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1833–1837, Jul. 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Fluid antenna with linear MMSE channel estimation for large-scale cellular networks,

    C. Skouroumounis and I. Krikidis, “Fluid antenna with linear MMSE channel estimation for large-scale cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Com- mun., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 1112–1125, Feb. 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    Channel estimation for movable antenna communication systems: A framework based on compressed sensing,

    Z. Xiao et al., “Channel estimation for movable antenna communication systems: A framework based on compressed sensing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 814–11 830, Sept. 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Compressed sensing based channel estimation for movable antenna communications,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Compressed sensing based channel estimation for movable antenna communications,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2747–2751, Oct. 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Online learning-induced port selection for fluid antenna in dynamic channel environment,

    J. Zou, S. Sun, and C. Wang, “Online learning-induced port selection for fluid antenna in dynamic channel environment,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 313–317, Feb. 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Channel state information extrapolation in fluid antenna systems based on masked language model,

    X. Wu, H. Zhang, C.-C. Wang, and Z. Li, “Channel state information extrapolation in fluid antenna systems based on masked language model,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Workshops (ICC Workshops) , pp. 1383–1388, 9-13 Jun. 2024, Denver, CO, USA

    2024

  48. [56]

    Learning-induced channel extrapolation for fluid antenna systems using asymmetric graph masked autoencoder,

    H. Zhang et al. , “Learning-induced channel extrapolation for fluid antenna systems using asymmetric graph masked autoencoder,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1665–1669, Jun. 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Channel estimation for FAS-assisted multiuser mmWave systems,

    H. Xu et al. , “Channel estimation for FAS-assisted multiuser mmWave systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 632–636, Mar. 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Successive bayesian reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna systems,

    Z. Zhang, J. Zhu, L. Dai, and R. W. Heath, “Successive bayesian reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1992–2006, Mar. 2025

    1992

  51. [59]

    Hybrid evolutionary-based sparse channel estimation for IRS-assisted mmWave MIMO systems,

    Z. Chen et al., “Hybrid evolutionary-based sparse channel estimation for IRS-assisted mmWave MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1586–1601, Mar. 2022

    2022

  52. [60]

    Channel estimation and reconstruction in fluid antenna system: Oversampling is essential,

    W. K. New et al. , “Channel estimation and reconstruction in fluid antenna system: Oversampling is essential,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 309–322, Jan. 2025

    2025

  53. [61]

    Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm,

    A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin, “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm,” Proc. Royal Statistical Society, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 1977

    1977

  54. [62]

    Updating the Inverse of a Matrix,

    W. W. Hager, “Updating the Inverse of a Matrix,” SIAM Review, vol. 31, pp. 221-239, 1989

    1989

  55. [63]

    Robust m-estimators of multivariate location and scatter,

    R. A. Maronna, “Robust m-estimators of multivariate location and scatter,” Annals Statistics , vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–67, 1976

    1976

  56. [64]

    Layover solution in multi- baseline SAR interferometry,

    F. Gini, F. Lombardini and M. Montanari, “Layover solution in multi- baseline SAR interferometry,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1344–1356, Oct. 2002

    2002

  57. [65]

    QuaDRiGa: A 3- D multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,

    S. Jaeckel, L. Raschkowski, K. B ¨ orner, and L. Thiele, “QuaDRiGa: A 3- D multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,” IEEE Trans. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3242–3256, Jun. 2014

    2014

  58. [66]

    Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,

    G. TR, “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,” 3GPP TR 38.901 version 14.0.0 Release , Dec. 2019

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.