Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Perturbatively exact supersymmetric partition functions of ABJM theory on Seifert manifolds and holography

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims an all-orders-in-1/N formula for the ABJM partition function on any Seifert manifold M_{g,p}, matched holographically to Euclidean AdS-Taub-Bolt backgrounds including subleading and logarithmic corrections.

desk verdict A useful all-orders extension of the ABJM Seifert partition function, built on numerical-fit inputs and an unproven single-vacuum saturation; deserves review but should be published only after the claims are narrowed or the gap is filled. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09006 v2 pith:2NF4JK3T submitted 2024-11-13 hep-th

Junho Hong This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords ABJMtheorySeifertmanifoldsBetheformulationtopologicallytwistedindexAdS/CFTEuclideanS-Taub-Boltgraviphotonflatconnection1/Nexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the supersymmetric partition function of ABJM theory (the U(N)_k × U(N)_{-k} Chern-Simons-matter theory) on any Seifert manifold M_{g,p} — a circle bundle with first Chern number p over a genus-g Riemann surface — can be evaluated to all orders in the 1/N expansion, up to exponentially suppressed corrections, using the Bethe-formula approach. The resulting closed-form expression is then matched, under the universal R-symmetry twist, against the regularized on-shell action of Euclidean AdS-Taub-Bolt solutions with four-derivative corrections, reproducing both the $N^{{1/2}}$ subleading term and the log N correction of the M-theory path integral. The key step is the unambiguous determination of the U(1)_R holonomy along the Seifert fiber: the flat connection in the background graviphoton field forces ν_R = ±1/2, which fixes the field-theory background and turns the holographic comparison from an assumption into a derived statement. A sympathetic reader would care because it extends the exact Airy-type control of ABJM observables from $S^{3}$ and $S^{1}$ × Σ_g to a much larger family of three-manifolds and sharpens the quantum supergravity dictionary beyond the leading semiclassical order.

What carries the argument

The Bethe formulation of 3d N=2 partition functions on Seifert manifolds: the partition function is written as a sum over Bethe vacua of products of a fibering operator F^p, a handle-gluing operator $H^{{g-1}}$, and flavor flux operators, with the vacuum determined by equations Π_i = 1. The evaluation is carried by closed-form numerical results for the ABJM effective twisted superpotential and topologically twisted index, and the dual machinery is the Euclidean AdS-Taub-Bolt solution in 4d N=2 minimal gauged supergravity, whose graviphoton flat connection αdτ fixes the U(1)_R holonomy to ν_R = ±1/2. The paper's central identity is (3.25), the closed-form expression for \(\operatorname{Re}\log $Z^{{\mathrm{ABJM}}$}_{M_{g,p}}\).

What would settle it

Solve the ABJM Bethe equations (3.12) numerically at finite N for a generic choice of (g, p, Δ, n) and evaluate the Bethe sum (3.13) on every solution; finding a second isolated solution whose summand is comparable to the dominant one, or a continuous family of solutions, would show that equation (3.25) is not the complete partition function.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the ABJM partition function on the Seifert manifold M_{g,p} is given to all orders in 1/N by equation (3.25): a closed expression built from the fibering operator and the all-order topologically twisted index, with explicit $N^{{3/2}}$, $N^{{1/2}}$, log N, and N-independent terms in the shifted rank \(\widehat{N}_{k,\$\Delta$}\), plus corrections of order \($e^{{-\sqrt{N}}$}\). At the universal twist \(\$\Delta$^*_a = \nu_R/2\), \(n^*_a = (1-g)/2\), this expression matches the regularized on-shell action of the 1/4-BPS Euclidean AdS-Taub-Bolt\(_\pm\) backgrounds, including four-derivative corrections and the logarithmic correction, once the U(1)_R holonomy is fixed to \(\nu_R = \pm 1/2\). The paper also demonstrates a reflection symmetry \(Z_{M_{g,p}}(\$\Delta$,n) = Z_{M_{g,-p}}(-\$\Delta$,n)\), which extends the result to the complementary range \(\sum_a[\Delta_a]=3\). The decisive new input is the specification of the graviphoton flat connection in the dual background, which determines the U(1)_R holonomy and therefore removes the ambiguity in the field-theory background.

Load-bearing premise

The whole all-orders result rests on treating the Bethe sum as a single isolated vacuum: the paper omits all other solutions of the Bethe equations without showing that their contributions are exponentially suppressed or cancel, an issue it explicitly flags as open in Section 6.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Equation (3.25) can serve as the exact target for any future independent computation of ABJM observables on Seifert manifolds, since it is claimed valid for all p, g, k, and chemical potentials obeying the stated constraints.
  • The explicit N^{1/2} term provides a direct field-theory determination of the four-derivative supergravity coefficients in (5.9), sharpening the holographic dictionary beyond the leading order.
  • The log N term is matched by the Euler-characteristic one-loop formula, so the result supports that formula as the correct M-theory logarithm for bolt-type saddles.
  • The fixed holonomy ν_R = ±1/2 predicts anti-periodic boundary conditions for fermions along the Seifert fiber in the holographically dual background.
  • The reflection symmetry (3.32) determines the M_{g,p} partition function in the \(\sum[\Delta_a]=3\) chamber from the \(\sum[\Delta_a]=1\) chamber.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If additional Bethe vacua contribute at non-exponentially-small order, equation (3.25) would be only the dominant saddle contribution; identifying such vacua and their possible supergravity duals would be a natural continuation.
  • The same flat-connection prescription likely fixes the R-holonomy for other M2-brane SCFTs on Seifert manifolds, giving a possible universal rule: the graviphoton flat connection selects anti-periodic fermions and determines the universal twist.
  • The method could be adapted to compare the all-order partition function with equivariant-localization formulas for the Taub-Bolt gravitational free energy, potentially upgrading those semiclassical results to include N^{1/2} and log N corrections.
  • An analytic derivation of the N-independent constants \(\hat g_0\) and \(\hat f_0\) would complete the closed form; the paper only determines their leading large-k behavior.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper claims to compute the U(N)_k × U(N)_-k ABJM partition function on the Seifert manifold M_{g,p} to all orders in the 1/N expansion up to exponentially suppressed corrections. The computation uses the Bethe-Ansatz formulation of Closset–Kim–Willett, evaluating the Bethe sum (3.13) at a single Bethe vacuum and importing closed-form expressions for the TTI and on-shell Bethe potential from the author's earlier numerical analyses [16,17]. For the universal twist, the resulting expression (5.7) is matched holographically to the regularized on-shell action of the Euclidean AdS-Taub-Bolt backgrounds with two-derivative and four-derivative terms, including the logarithmic correction, under the AdS/CFT dictionary (5.9). A new element is the determination of the U(1)_R holonomy ν_R = ±1/2 from the graviphoton flat connection, which fixes the universal twist unambiguously.

Significance. If the result (3.25) were fully established, it would advance the program of all-order partition functions for ABJM theory beyond S^3 and S^1×Σ_g, and would provide a nontrivial test of both higher-derivative supergravity corrections and the Euler-characteristic proposal for log N corrections. The paper is careful and transparent about its assumptions, clearly listing the isolated-vacuum issue and the status of the numerical inputs. The leading N^{3/2} term correctly reduces to previous large-N results, and the log N coefficient −(1−g)/2 matches the Euler-characteristic proposal. The clarification of the graviphoton flat connection and the resulting ν_R = ±1/2 is a genuine contribution. However, the central claim of a perturbatively exact result currently rests on an unproved single-vacuum saturation and on numerically fitted inputs from [16,17], so the result is conditional rather than fully established.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, Eq. (3.14)] The central claim that (3.25) gives the complete 1/N expansion up to O(e^{-\sqrt{N}}) is not supported because the Bethe sum (3.13) is truncated after the single vacuum u*. The text after (3.14) states 'we will omit the contribution from other Bethe vacua' without providing an asymptotic estimate, symmetry argument, or numerical evidence for their suppression. Section 6 explicitly concedes that validating the isolated-vacuum assumption is an open issue, citing the continuous-family contamination in 4d N=4 SYM. If any additional isolated vacuum contributes at order N^{3/2} or N^{1/2}, then (3.25) is not the full M_{g,p} partition function and the holographic matching with the regularized AdS-Taub-Bolt action is incomplete.
  2. [§3.3, Eqs. (3.19) and (3.21)] The all-orders result (3.25) is built from the closed-form expressions (3.19) and (3.21), which are quoted from numerical fits in [16,17] rather than derived in this paper. These expressions are load-bearing inputs: the 'perturbatively exact' claim is only as strong as the evidence for those numerical formulae. The paper should either provide an analytic derivation or clearly state the empirical status, and should include independent checks (e.g., against exact small-N computations or alternative large-N expansions) to quantify the uncertainty.
  3. [§5.2, Eq. (5.9)] The holographic matching at order N^{1/2} is partially circular: the dictionary (5.9) fixes a, c1, and c2 using the same numerically fitted all-order expressions from [16] that were used to produce (5.7). Consequently, the agreement between the field theory and supergravity at N^{1/2} is not an independent test of the higher-derivative coefficients; it is a consistency condition that constrains them. This should be stated explicitly, and the match should be framed as fixing the dictionary rather than providing independent confirmation.
  4. [§3.3, Eq. (3.25) and Eqs. (3.28)–(3.31)] The proposed partition function (3.25) is not invariant under the full large gauge transformation (3.28); only the restricted transformation (3.29) is shown to preserve the constraints (3.26). The invariance of the N-independent terms is checked only at leading order in the large-k limit, as admitted after (3.31). For an alleged all-orders result, gauge invariance under the full large gauge transformation should be established, or at least the failure should be discussed as an open consistency issue.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'umambiguously' should be 'unambiguously'.
  2. [§3.2, below Eq. (3.14)] Typo: 'AdS/CCFT' should be 'AdS/CFT'.
  3. [§3.3, bullet after Eq. (3.25)] Typo: 'fist two terms' should be 'first two terms'.
  4. [Table 1] The table caption reads 'T able 1' instead of 'Table 1'.
  5. [References] Reference [27] is listed as 'to appear (2024), [xxxx.xxxxx]'; a placeholder arXiv number is not a complete citation and should be updated before publication.
  6. [§4.1] The section title is 'Euclidean AdS-T aub-Bolt geometry'; the spaced 'T aub' should be 'Taub'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

All-order M_{g,p} formula is assembled from the author's earlier numerical fits; the new p-dependence and flat-connection analysis provide independent content.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3.3, Eqs. (3.14), (3.19), (3.21)-(3.25); also Section 1]
    "Finally, in subsection 3.3, we evaluate this partition function to all orders in the 1/N-perturbative expansion by applying recent numerical analysis of the TTI [15, 17] to the Bethe formulation for the Mg,p partition function. ... This expression is derived by employing the closed-form expression for the on-shell Bethe potential at the BAE solution corresponding to the Bethe vacuum {u⋆} [16]."

    Equation (3.14) decomposes log Z_{M_{g,p}} as p log F(u⋆) plus log Z_{M_{g,0}}. The second piece is taken directly from the fitted TTI closed form (3.19) of [16], and the first piece is obtained from the on-shell Bethe potential (3.21) also imported from [16]. Consequently (3.25) is, by construction, a recombination of the author's earlier numerical fits: its N^{3/2}, N^{1/2}, and log N coefficients are inherited from those fits rather than derived here, and the 'perturbatively exact' label is an extrapolation of a fitted ansatz.

full rationale

The central M_{g,p} evaluation is not a first-principles solution of the ABJM Bethe equations; it imports the TTI and Bethe-potential closed forms from the same author's numerical works [15-17]. I therefore flag a load-bearing self-citation. However, this is not full circularity: the p-dependence via the fibering operator and the unambiguous U(1)_R holonomy ν_R=±1/2 from the graviphoton flat connection are new and not present in the cited fits. The N^{1/2} supergravity match retains independent content, since the parameter a from [16] cancels in the combination C+32π^2(c2-c1) entering the on-shell action. The log-N comparison also uses the independent general proposal (5.10), although [43] shares an author. Section 6 explicitly concedes that the single-Bethe-vacuum assumption is unproven and that continuous Bethe-vacua families contaminate analogous 4d formulas; that is a genuine correctness risk for the 'perturbatively exact' claim, but it is not a circularity. On the strict definition (identity by construction or fitted parameter renamed as prediction), the result is an input-dominated recombination, so score 4 rather than 6+.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The central claim depends on three families of fitted or imported constants and five background assumptions, reflecting that the all-orders result is assembled from prior numerical fits rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (3)
  • AdS/CFT dictionary coefficient a = Not explicitly stated; fixed by the fitted all-order TTI formula in [16]
    In (5.9), a is not fully determined by holographic matching alone and is imported from the author's earlier numerical TTI analysis; the N^{1/2} comparison therefore depends on a fitted input.
  • Higher-derivative coefficients c1, c2 = c1 = -N^{1/2}/(32π sqrt(2k)); c2 = -(a+(k^2+8)/24) N^{1/2}/(32π sqrt(2k))
    These values (5.9) are chosen to reproduce the field-theory N^{1/2} terms; they are not independently derived in this paper.
  • N-independent constants \hat g0 and \hat f0 = Numerical values from [16,17] for various (k, Δ, n) configurations
    These appear in (3.25) and (5.7); only the large-k leading terms are known analytically, so the O(1) part of the partition function is not pinned down by the paper.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Bethe formula (2.19) with isolated Bethe vacua computes the M_{g,p} partition function.
    Imported from [28-30]; Section 6 concedes that validating the isolated-vacuum assumption is still needed.
  • ad hoc to paper The ABJM Bethe equations are equivalent to the TTI Bethe-Ansatz equations of [16,17] under (3.16)-(3.18).
    Argued by parameter matching and real-Δ assumptions; no independent proof is given in this paper.
  • domain assumption The universal twist (5.5) is the correct holographic dual configuration for the Euclidean AdS-Taub-Bolt backgrounds.
    Standard in [44,45]; it depends on ν_R=±1/2 from the graviphoton flat connection.
  • domain assumption The graviphoton flat connection is fixed by requiring A_μ A^μ finite at the bolt, as in (4.12).
    Follows [39-41]; this choice fixes ν_R=±1/2 and anti-periodic fermions along the Seifert fiber.
  • ad hoc to paper The Euler characteristic of the Euclidean AdS-Taub-Bolt is 2(1-g) with no boundary contribution, giving the log N coefficient -(1-g)/2.
    Footnote 11 flags a boundary subtlety in the Euler characteristic and defers its resolution to future work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perturbatively exact supersymmetric partition functions of ABJM theory on Seifert manifolds and holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2NF4JK3T

@misc{pith2026241109006,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perturbatively exact supersymmetric partition functions of ABJM theory on Seifert manifolds and holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2NF4JK3T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09006}
}
abstract

We undertake a comprehensive analysis of the supersymmetric partition function of the $\text{U}(N)_k\times\text{U}(N)_{-k}$ ABJM theory on a Seifert manifold, evaluating it to all orders in the $1/N$-perturbative expansion up to exponentially suppressed corrections. Through holographic duality, our perturbatively exact result is successfully matched with the regularized on-shell action of a dual Euclidean AdS$_4$-Taub-Bolt background incorporating 4-derivative corrections, and also provides valuable insights into the logarithmic corrections that emerge from the 1-loop calculations in M-theory path integrals. In this process, we revisit the Euclidean AdS$_4$-Taub-Bolt background carefully, elucidating the flat connection in the background graviphoton field. This analysis umambiguously determines the U(1)$_R$ holonomy along the Seifert fiber, thereby solidifying the holographic comparison regarding the partition function on a large class of Seifert manifolds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Equivariant localization for $D=4$ gauged supergravity

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Supersymmetric Euclidean D=4 N=2 gauged supergravity actions and fluxes localize onto R-symmetry fixed points, proving large-N SCFT free-energy formulas and UV-IR relations.

  2. NUTs, Bolts, and Spindles

    hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    New infinite families of supersymmetric spindle-bolt solutions with branched lens-space boundaries are constructed, with on-shell actions matching equivariant localization.

  3. An Airy Tale at Large $N$

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper presents numerical and analytic evidence that the large-N sphere partition function of five classes of M2-brane SCFTs, with squashing and real masses, takes the form of an Airy function to all orders in 1/N.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [16]

    Bobev, J

    N. Bobev, J. Hong and V. Reys, Large N partition functions of the ABJM theory , JHEP 02 (2023) 020, [ 2210.09318]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Pestun, Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops , Commun

    V. Pestun, Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops , Commun. Math. Phys. 313 (2012) 71–129, [ 0712.2824]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [2]

    Pestun et al., Localization techniques in quantum field theories , J

    V. Pestun et al., Localization techniques in quantum field theories , J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 440301, [1608.02952]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [3]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals , JHEP 10 (2008) 091, [0806.1218]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [4]

    Kapustin, B

    A. Kapustin, B. Willett and I. Yaakov, Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter , JHEP 03 (2010) 089, [ 0909.4559]

    arXiv 2010

  6. [5]

    I. R. Klebanov and A. A. Tseytlin, Entropy of near extremal black p-branes , Nucl. Phys. B 475 (1996) 164–178, [ hep-th/9604089]

    arXiv 1996

  7. [6]

    Drukker, M

    N. Drukker, M. Marino and P. Putrov, From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 306 (2011) 511–563, [ 1007.3837]

    arXiv 2011

  8. [7]

    C. P. Herzog, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu and T. Tesileanu, Multi-Matrix Models and Tri-Sasaki Einstein Spaces, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 046001, [ 1011.5487]

    arXiv 2011

Show all 81 references
  1. [8]

    H. Fuji, S. Hirano and S. Moriyama, Summing Up All Genus Free Energy of ABJM Matrix Model, JHEP 08 (2011) 001, [ 1106.4631]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Marino and P

    M. Marino and P. Putrov, ABJM theory as a Fermi gas , J. Stat. Mech. 1203 (2012) P03001, [1110.4066]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Bobev, A

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, K. Hristov and V. Reys, The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Higher-Derivative Supergravity in AdS 4 Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 131601, [2006.09390]. – 32 –

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Bobev, A

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, K. Hristov and V. Reys, Higher-derivative supergravity, AdS4 holography, and black holes , JHEP 08 (2021) 173, [ 2106.04581]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Bhattacharyya, A

    S. Bhattacharyya, A. Grassi, M. Marino and A. Sen, A One-Loop Test of Quantum Supergravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 015012, [ 1210.6057]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Benini and A

    F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni, A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories, JHEP 07 (2015) 127, [ 1504.03698]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Benini, K

    F. Benini, K. Hristov and A. Zaffaroni, Black hole microstates in AdS 4 from supersymmetric localization, JHEP 05 (2016) 054, [ 1511.04085]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Bobev, J

    N. Bobev, J. Hong and V. Reys, Large N Partition Functions, Holography, and Black Holes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 041602, [ 2203.14981]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bobev, S

    N. Bobev, S. Choi, J. Hong and V. Reys, Large N superconformal indices for 3d holographic SCFTs, JHEP 02 (2023) 027, [ 2210.15326]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bobev, J

    N. Bobev, J. Hong and V. Reys, Large N partition functions of 3d holographic SCFTs , JHEP 08 (2023) 119, [ 2304.01734]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Bobev, S

    N. Bobev, S. Choi, J. Hong and V. Reys, Superconformal Indices of 3d N = 2 SCFTs and Holography, 2407.13177

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Mezei and S

    M. Mezei and S. S. Pufu, Three-sphere free energy for classical gauge groups , JHEP 02 (2014) 037, [1312.0920]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Grassi and M

    A. Grassi and M. Marino, M-theoretic matrix models, JHEP 02 (2015) 115, [ 1403.4276]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Nosaka, Instanton effects in ABJM theory with general R-charge assignments , JHEP 03 (2016) 059, [ 1512.02862]

    T. Nosaka, Instanton effects in ABJM theory with general R-charge assignments , JHEP 03 (2016) 059, [ 1512.02862]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Hatsuda and T

    Y. Hatsuda and T. Okazaki, Fermi-gas correlators of ADHM theory and triality symmetry , SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 005, [ 2107.01924]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    S. M. Chester, S. S. Pufu, Y. Wang and X. Yin, Bootstrapping M-theory orbifolds, JHEP 06 (2024) 001, [ 2312.13112]

    2024

  17. [25]

    Hristov, ABJM at finite N via 4d supergravity , JHEP 10 (2022) 190, [ 2204.02992]

    K. Hristov, ABJM at finite N via 4d supergravity , JHEP 10 (2022) 190, [ 2204.02992]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Geukens and J

    S. Geukens and J. Hong, Subleading analysis for S 3 partition functions of N = 2 holographic SCFTs, JHEP 06 (2024) 190, [ 2405.00845]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bobev, P.-J

    N. Bobev, P.-J. De Smet, J. Hong, V. Reys and X. Zhang, Squashed 3-sphere partition functions and Airy formulae , to appear (2024) , [ xxxx.xxxxx]

    2024

  20. [28]

    Closset, H

    C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett, Supersymmetric partition functions and the three-dimensional A-twist, JHEP 03 (2017) 074, [ 1701.03171]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Closset, H

    C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett, Seifert fibering operators in 3d N = 2 theories, JHEP 11 (2018) 004, [ 1807.02328]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Kim, Three-dimensional N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories and partition functions on Seifert manifolds: A review , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34 (2019) 1930011, [1908.08875]. – 33 –

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Toldo and B

    C. Toldo and B. Willett, Partition functions on 3d circle bundles and their gravity duals , JHEP 05 (2018) 116, [ 1712.08861]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bobev, A

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, D. Gang, K. Hristov and V. Reys, Higher-derivative supergravity, wrapped M5-branes, and theories of class R, JHEP 04 (2021) 058, [ 2011.05971]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Martelli, A

    D. Martelli, A. Passias and J. Sparks, The supersymmetric NUTs and bolts of holography , Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 810–870, [ 1212.4618]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, Large N phases, gravitational instantons and the nuts and bolts of AdS holography , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 064010, [hep-th/9808177]

    1999 arXiv

  27. [35]

    S. W. Hawking, C. J. Hunter and D. N. Page, Nut charge, anti-de Sitter space and entropy , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 044033, [ hep-th/9809035]

    1999 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Alonso-Alberca, P

    N. Alonso-Alberca, P. Meessen and T. Ortin, Supersymmetry of topological Kerr-Newman-Taub-NUT-AdS space-times, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 2783–2798, [hep-th/0003071]

    2000 arXiv

  29. [37]

    A. H. Taub, Empty space-times admitting a three parameter group of motions , Annals Math. 53 (1951) 472–490

    1951

  30. [38]

    Newman, L

    E. Newman, L. Tamburino and T. Unti, Empty space generalization of the Schwarzschild metric, J. Math. Phys. 4 (1963) 915

    1963

  31. [39]

    Cabo-Bizet, D

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli and S. Murthy, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS 5 black holes , JHEP 10 (2019) 062, [1810.11442]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Benetti Genolini, A

    P. Benetti Genolini, A. Cabo-Bizet and S. Murthy, Supersymmetric phases of AdS 4/CFT3, JHEP 06 (2023) 125, [ 2301.00763]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Benetti Genolini and C

    P. Benetti Genolini and C. Toldo, Magnetic charge and black hole supersymmetric quantum statistical relation, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) L121902, [ 2304.00605]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Hristov and V

    K. Hristov and V. Reys, Factorization of log-corrections in AdS 4/CFT3 from supergravity localization, JHEP 12 (2021) 031, [ 2107.12398]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bobev, M

    N. Bobev, M. David, J. Hong, V. Reys and X. Zhang, A compendium of logarithmic corrections in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 (2024) 020, [ 2312.08909]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Azzurli, N

    F. Azzurli, N. Bobev, P. M. Crichigno, V. S. Min and A. Zaffaroni, A universal counting of black hole microstates in AdS 4, JHEP 02 (2018) 054, [ 1707.04257]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Bobev and P

    N. Bobev and P. M. Crichigno, Universal RG Flows Across Dimensions and Holography , JHEP 12 (2017) 065, [ 1708.05052]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Kim, Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories , JHEP 08 (2016) 059, [ 1605.06531]

    2016 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Closset, T

    C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia and Z. Komargodski, Supersymmetric Field Theories on Three-Manifolds, JHEP 05 (2013) 017, [ 1212.3388]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Closset, T

    C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia and Z. Komargodski, The Geometry of Supersymmetric Partition Functions, JHEP 01 (2014) 124, [ 1309.5876]. – 34 –

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    S. M. Hosseini and A. Zaffaroni, Large N matrix models for 3d N = 2 theories: twisted index, free energy and black holes , JHEP 08 (2016) 064, [ 1604.03122]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    S. M. Hosseini and N. Mekareeya, Large N topologically twisted index: necklace quivers, dualities, and Sasaki-Einstein spaces , JHEP 08 (2016) 089, [ 1604.03397]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [51]

    J. T. Liu, L. A. Pando Zayas, V. Rathee and W. Zhao, Toward Microstate Counting Beyond Large N in Localization and the Dual One-loop Quantum Supergravity , JHEP 01 (2018) 026, [1707.04197]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Closset, S

    C. Closset, S. Cremonesi and D. S. Park, The equivariant A-twist and gauged linear sigma models on the two-sphere , JHEP 06 (2015) 076, [ 1504.06308]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    D. Z. Freedman and S. S. Pufu, The holography of F -maximization, JHEP 03 (2014) 135, [1302.7310]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Aharony, A

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K. A. Intriligator, N. Seiberg and M. J. Strassler, Aspects of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 499 (1997) 67–99, [hep-th/9703110]

    1997 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Benini and E

    F. Benini and E. Milan, Black Holes in 4D N =4 Super-Yang-Mills Field Theory , Phys. Rev. X 10 (2020) 021037, [ 1812.09613]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Classification of Gravitational Instanton Symmetries , Commun. Math. Phys. 66 (1979) 291–310

    1979

  49. [57]

    L. J. Romans, Supersymmetric, cold and lukewarm black holes in cosmological Einstein-Maxwell theory, Nucl. Phys. B 383 (1992) 395–415, [ hep-th/9203018]

    1992 arXiv

  50. [58]

    P. B. Genolini and P. Richmond, Supersymmetry of higher-derivative supergravity in AdS4 holography, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) L061902, [ 2107.04590]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    de Wit and H

    B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, The Consistency of the S**7 Truncation in D=11 Supergravity , Nucl. Phys. B 281 (1987) 211–240

    1987

  52. [60]

    J. P. Gauntlett and O. Varela, Consistent Kaluza-Klein reductions for general supersymmetric AdS solutions, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 126007, [ 0707.2315]

    2007 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, A. L¨ uscher and J. Sparks, Localization of the Free Energy in Supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 141601, [ 2407.02554]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, A. L¨ uscher and J. Sparks, Toric gravitational instantons in gauged supergravity , 2410.19036

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett and J. Sparks, Equivariant Localization in Supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 121602, [ 2306.03868]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Benetti Genolini, J

    P. Benetti Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett and J. Sparks, Equivariant localization for AdS/CFT , JHEP 02 (2024) 015, [ 2308.11701]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Martelli and A

    D. Martelli and A. Zaffaroni, Equivariant localization and holography , Lett. Math. Phys. 114 (2024) 15, [ 2306.03891]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Colombo, F

    E. Colombo, F. Faedo, D. Martelli and A. Zaffaroni, Equivariant volume extremization and holography, JHEP 01 (2024) 095, [ 2309.04425]. – 35 –

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    J. T. Liu, L. A. Pando Zayas, V. Rathee and W. Zhao, One-Loop Test of Quantum Black Holes in anti–de Sitter Space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 221602, [ 1711.01076]

    2018 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Benini, D

    F. Benini, D. Gang and L. A. Pando Zayas, Rotating Black Hole Entropy from M5 Branes , JHEP 03 (2020) 057, [ 1909.11612]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [69]

    L. A. Pando Zayas and Y. Xin, Universal logarithmic behavior in microstate counting and the dual one-loop entropy of AdS4 black holes , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 026003, [ 2008.03239]

    2021 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Hong and J

    J. Hong and J. T. Liu, The topologically twisted index of N = 4 super-Yang-Mills on T 2 × S2 and the elliptic genus , JHEP 07 (2018) 018, [ 1804.04592]

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Benini and E

    F. Benini and E. Milan, A Bethe Ansatz type formula for the superconformal index , Commun. Math. Phys. 376 (2020) 1413–1440, [ 1811.04107]

    2020 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Arabi Ardehali, J

    A. Arabi Ardehali, J. Hong and J. T. Liu, Asymptotic growth of the 4d N = 4 index and partially deconfined phases, JHEP 07 (2020) 073, [ 1912.04169]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    A. G. Lezcano, J. Hong, J. T. Liu and L. A. Pando Zayas, The Bethe-Ansatz approach to the N = 4 superconformal index at finite rank , JHEP 06 (2021) 126, [ 2101.12233]

    2021 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Benini and G

    F. Benini and G. Rizi, Superconformal index of low-rank gauge theories via the Bethe Ansatz , JHEP 05 (2021) 061, [ 2102.03638]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Hristov, 4d N = 2 supergravity observables from Nekrasov-like partition functions , JHEP 02 (2022) 079, [ 2111.06903]

    K. Hristov, 4d N = 2 supergravity observables from Nekrasov-like partition functions , JHEP 02 (2022) 079, [ 2111.06903]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Hristov, Equivariant localization and gluing rules in 4d N = 2 higher derivative supergravity, 6, 2024

    K. Hristov, Equivariant localization and gluing rules in 4d N = 2 higher derivative supergravity, 6, 2024. 2406.18648

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Hatsuda, S

    Y. Hatsuda, S. Moriyama and K. Okuyama, Instanton Effects in ABJM Theory from Fermi Gas Approach, JHEP 01 (2013) 158, [ 1211.1251]

    2013 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Nosaka, Large N expansion of mass deformed ABJM matrix model: M2-instanton condensation and beyond , JHEP 03 (2024) 087, [ 2401.11484]

    T. Nosaka, Large N expansion of mass deformed ABJM matrix model: M2-instanton condensation and beyond , JHEP 03 (2024) 087, [ 2401.11484]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    F. F. Gautason, V. G. M. Puletti and J. van Muiden, Quantized strings and instantons in holography, JHEP 08 (2023) 218, [ 2304.12340]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Beccaria, S

    M. Beccaria, S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin, Instanton contributions to the ABJM free energy from quantum M2 branes , JHEP 10 (2023) 029, [ 2307.14112]

    2023 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Bobev, A

    N. Bobev, A. M. Charles and V. S. Min, Euclidean black saddles and AdS 4 black holes , JHEP 10 (2020) 073, [ 2006.01148]. – 36 –

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.