Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 54 references

An Innovative Computational Fluid Dynamics Discrete Dipole Approximation (CFD-DDA) Platform for Predicting Airborne Virus-in-Saliva Disinfection by Ultraviolet Irradiation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read UV light scattering inside airborne saliva droplets is highly non-uniform and must be counted when predicting virus inactivation.

desk verdict First CFD–DDA coupling for evaporating irregular saliva droplets is real; the named square-root inactivation law is not yet derived or calibrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06746 v1 pith:2RSC7YPR submitted 2026-07-07 physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph

Talib Dbouk , Maxim Yurkin This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynphysics.comp-ph
keywords UVscatteringUVCairpurifiersvirusdisinfectionsalivaaerosolscomputationalfluiddynamicsdiscretedipoleapproximationChick-Watsonlawairbornecoronavirus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Existing models of ultraviolet disinfection of viruses carried in airborne saliva droplets treat the UV dose as if the light field inside each droplet were uniform. This paper couples a fluid-dynamics solver that tracks evaporating, polydisperse saliva droplets in airflow with a discrete-dipole solver that computes the internal UV intensity field, and shows that both spherical and evaporation-distorted droplets develop strong intensity contrasts that leave large fractions of their volume poorly illuminated. The authors therefore replace the classical Chick–Watson survival law with a corrected “Dbouk–Yurkin” form that multiplies the nominal dose by a scattering-derived factor derived from those intensity maps. They then quantify how initial droplet size distribution, airflow rate, and wall-interaction rules change the final number of surviving coronavirus copies under fixed temperature and humidity. A reader who designs or evaluates UV air purifiers cares because the work claims that every efficiency estimate built on uniform-dose kinetics is systematically incomplete.

What carries the argument

The CFD–DDA platform (Euler–Lagrange CFD for droplet transport and evaporation coupled to the discrete-dipole approximation for the internal UV field) together with the Dbouk–Yurkin law Ns(ψ)=N0 exp(-Z H(ψ)), H(ψ)=√ψ × Hξ=1, which folds the DDA-derived volume fraction of poorly illuminated regions into an effective dose.

What would settle it

Measure inactivation of a known number of virions inside single, size-controlled evaporating saliva droplets under a calibrated UVC beam and compare the survival curve to the Dbouk–Yurkin prediction with and without the square-root dose correction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Infected saliva droplets—whether still spherical or already irregular from evaporation—experience highly non-uniform UV light scattering; the resulting low-intensity pockets significantly increase the number of surviving virus copies relative to models that assume uniform illumination, so scattering cannot be neglected in any realistic three-dimensional inactivation calculation.

Load-bearing premise

The conversion of the poorly illuminated volume fraction into an effective UV dose relies on a square-root formula that is introduced without derivation or independent experimental calibration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Air-purifier designs that only lengthen residence time will still leave virions protected if droplets do not rotate or mix internally.
  • Efficiency claims based on bulk-liquid or uniform-dose Chick–Watson kinetics will overestimate inactivation for real polydisperse saliva aerosols.
  • Evaporation-driven shape change and the associated rise in refractive index further shield embedded viruses and must be modeled.
  • Wall–droplet interaction rules (stick versus escape) and the initial size distribution strongly alter predicted survivor counts, so geometry and operating conditions matter quantitatively.
  • Engineering approaches that induce droplet spin or local mixing are required to overcome internal optical shielding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The square-root map from low-intensity volume fraction to effective dose is an uncalibrated ansatz; single-droplet optical or inactivation experiments could fix or refute it.
  • The same CFD–DDA coupling could be re-run for far-UVC (222 nm) or multi-lamp geometries where angular incidence and inter-droplet scattering become first-order.
  • Because 100 nm virions diffuse only micrometres inside viscous, gelling saliva on purifier transit timescales, the intensity map essentially freezes each virion’s survival probability at its initial location.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a coupled Euler–Lagrange CFD–DDA platform that computes UV irradiance and droplet trajectories/evaporation (CFD) together with three-dimensional light-scattering fields inside spherical and irregularly shaped saliva droplets (DDA). It shows that the interior UV intensity is highly non-uniform, proposes the “Dbouk–Yurkin law” Ns(ψ)=N0 exp(−Z H(ψ)) with H(ψ)=√ψ Hξ=1 as a correction to the classical Chick–Watson law, and uses the platform to quantify the influence of initial size distribution, droplet number, airflow rate and wall-interaction boundary conditions on the number of surviving coronavirus copies under a fixed set of environmental parameters.

Significance. If the non-uniform scattering maps and a properly justified effective-dose correction hold, the work would supply the first fully three-dimensional multiphysics framework for UV air-purifier design and would demonstrate that scattering cannot be neglected for either spherical or evaporated irregular droplets. The DDA intensity fields themselves (Figs. 9–16) and the systematic parametric CFD study of size distributions, loadings and wall laws constitute a genuine advance over prior CFD-only treatments that assumed uniform fluence. The platform is therefore potentially useful for engineering optimization once the mapping from intensity histograms to effective fluence is placed on a firmer footing.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 12, Eqs. (54)–(55)] Section 12, Eqs. (54)–(55): the central quantitative claim rests on the undervived square-root map H(ψ)=√ψ Hξ=1 that converts the DDA-derived volume fraction ψ of low-intensity regions into an effective dose. No derivation, averaging argument or independent calibration is supplied; replacing √ψ by ψ, by a volume-averaged ⟨ξ⟩ or by a thresholded integral changes the predicted log-reduction by factors of order 2–10 for the reported ψ values (10–40 %). All subsequent Ns curves therefore inherit an arbitrary scaling.
  2. [Section 9.2, Figs. 13–16] Section 9.2 and Figs. 13–16: the definition of ψ itself depends on an arbitrary intensity threshold (ξ<0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75). Different thresholds produce systematically different ψ(Ds) curves, yet the manuscript never shows how the choice propagates into the final Ns predictions or justifies a preferred cutoff on physical grounds (e.g., relative to the virion absorption cross-section).
  3. [Section 13, Figs. 19–24] Section 13 (Figs. 19–24): the quantitative survival curves are presented under the classical Chick–Watson form with Hξ=1; the Dbouk–Yurkin correction is not applied consistently to the same data sets. Consequently it is unclear whether the reported effects of size distribution, loading and wall law survive once the scattering correction is inserted.
  4. [Sections 9–13] No experimental validation or even order-of-magnitude comparison is offered for either the DDA interior intensity fields or the predicted Ns values. Given that the platform is advanced as a design tool, at least a limited comparison against existing bulk-liquid or aerosol UV-susceptibility data (or a clear statement of the validation path) is required for the quantitative claims to be load-bearing.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 9.2] The refractive index n=1.60 adopted for dried saliva is stated without citation or sensitivity study; a short justification or range would strengthen the DDA results.
  2. [Figs. 5–7, 25–27] Several figure captions repeat nearly identical long parameter lists; condensing them would improve readability.
  3. [Throughout] Typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “PFD-a” vs “PDF-a”, “Dbouk-Yurkin” hyphenation, missing spaces before units).
  4. [Section 7.3] The spin-down time estimate (Eq. 37) is useful but the assumption that rotation remains negligible for the entire residence time could be checked against the local shear rates extracted from the CFD fields.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circular reduction; DDA fields and CFD trajectories are independent of the inactivation law, but the undervived square-root map H(ψ)=√ψ H_ξ=1 is an author-chosen ansatz that every quantitative Ns inherits.

  1. other [Section 12, Eqs. (54)–(55)]
    "one thus can rewrite a new log reduction law ( named "Dbouk–Yurkin" law) as the following: Ns(ψ) = N0 × e−Z×H(ψ) (54) where H(ψ) = √ψ × Hξ=1 (55)"

    The square-root functional form that converts the DDA volume fraction ψ into an effective fluence is asserted without derivation from the intensity field, from first-principles inactivation kinetics, or from external calibration. Every subsequent quantitative Ns curve (Figs. 19–24) therefore inherits an arbitrary scaling chosen by the authors rather than forced by the preceding DDA or CFD calculations. This is an undervived ansatz, not a tautological reduction of a prediction to its inputs, hence only mild circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain does not reduce any claimed prediction to its own inputs by construction. DDA computes the local intensity field ξ(r) from Maxwell's equations for given droplet shape and refractive index (independent of any inactivation kinetics). CFD independently integrates droplet trajectories, evaporation, and the external irradiance Ep to obtain the uncorrected fluence H_ξ=1. The only non-first-principles step is the subsequent mapping H(ψ)=√ψ H_ξ=1 that converts a DDA-derived volume fraction ψ into an effective dose; this map is simply asserted in Section 12 after the intensity maps and is never derived from the intensity histogram, from a microscopic inactivation model, or calibrated to external kill data. Because the map is an arbitrary functional choice rather than a tautological re-expression of the inputs, the circularity is mild (score 2). Replacing √ψ by any other monotone function of ψ would change the numerical Ns curves while leaving the qualitative non-uniformity claim intact. No self-citation is load-bearing for the central claim, and no uniqueness theorem or fitted parameter is recycled as a prediction. The platform itself is therefore self-contained; only the quantitative scaling of the proposed law rests on an undervived ansatz.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim that scattering cannot be neglected and that the Dbouk-Yurkin form corrects for it rests on a handful of free numerical choices (Z bounds, refractive index, packing fraction, the square-root map) and on domain assumptions about virion immobility and optical homogeneity that are not independently verified inside the paper.

free parameters (5)
  • UV susceptibility Z = 0.0183 or 0.377 m^{2}/J
    Two literature extremes (0.0183 and 0.377 m^{2}/J) are adopted without new measurement; all Ns curves scale directly with Z.
  • refractive index of dried saliva = 1.60
    Fixed at n=1.60 for all DDA runs; controls the entire scattering pattern.
  • square-root dose correction = √ψ
    H(ψ)=√ψ H_ξ=1 is introduced without derivation; every quantitative survival number depends on it.
  • initial viral load = 10^9 copies-RNA/mL
    Chosen as intermediate literature value 10⁹ copies/mL; sets absolute N0.
  • maximum packing fraction = 0.74
    0.74 used to convert volume fraction to virion count inside each droplet.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Virions remain immobilized inside evaporating saliva droplets on the residence-time scale of the purifier (≤0.5 s).
    Section 6 diffusion-time estimates; if advection or residual mobility mixes virions, the low-ξ shielding argument collapses.
  • domain assumption Virions and mucin act only as dilute perturbations; the droplet can be treated as optically homogeneous saliva for DDA.
    Section 2.3; volume fraction ~0.037 % is cited but not proven negligible for local intensity hotspots.
  • domain assumption Droplet rotation is negligible because spin-down time au_spin ≪ residence time.
    Section 7.3 Stokes rotational drag estimate; if residual spin persists, the time-averaged scattering field changes.
  • domain assumption Chick-Watson first-order kinetics remain valid once the local dose is replaced by the scattering-corrected H(ψ).
    Section 10-12; multi-hit or shielding kinetics could alter the functional form.
  • standard math Standard k-ε RANS plus Ranz-Marshall evaporation adequately capture the carrier flow and droplet size evolution.
    Sections 4.2-4.4; common engineering closure, but known to under-resolve near-lamp turbulence.
invented entities (1)
  • Dbouk-Yurkin law
    purpose: Extends Chick-Watson by inserting a DDA-derived scattering factor ψ into the effective UV dose.
    Named and proposed in section 12; no independent experimental confirmation outside this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Innovative Computational Fluid Dynamics Discrete Dipole Approximation (CFD-DDA) Platform for Predicting Airborne Virus-in-Saliva Disinfection by Ultraviolet Irradiation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RSC7YPR

@misc{pith2026260706746,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Innovative Computational Fluid Dynamics Discrete Dipole Approximation (CFD-DDA) Platform for Predicting Airborne Virus-in-Saliva Disinfection by Ultraviolet Irradiation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RSC7YPR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06746}
}
abstract

All published models of ultraviolet (UV) inactivation of airborne viruses in saliva droplets have neglected UV light scattering. To the best of our knowledge, this work presents the first Computational Fluid Dynamics-Discrete Dipole Approximation (CFD-DDA) platform for investigating the physical mechanisms governing UV disinfection of virus-laden airborne saliva droplets. The DDA solver predicts UV light scattering by both spherical and irregularly shaped saliva droplets, while the CFD solver predicts droplet evaporation and transport in airflow. By coupling the DDA and CFD solvers, we demonstrate that infected saliva droplets, whether spherical or irregularly shaped due to evaporation, experience highly non-uniform UV light scattering that significantly affects virus inactivation and cannot be neglected. This phenomenon has not previously been investigated within a fully three-dimensional framework. The coupled Euler-Lagrange CFD-DDA model further quantifies the effects of (i) the initial droplet size distribution and concentration, (ii) airflow rate, and (iii) droplet interactions with the surrounding airflow and bounding walls on the total number of surviving coronavirus copies $N_s$, assuming a virion diameter of 100 nm, an air temperature of 21 $^{\circ}$C, and a relative humidity of 65%. Based on the DDA results, a new virus inactivation model, referred to as the Dbouk-Yurkin law, is proposed. This model extends the classical Chick-Watson law by explicitly accounting for UV light scattering in both spherical and non-spherical airborne saliva droplets. The proposed three-dimensional CFD-DDA platform provides a powerful framework for improving the understanding of UV-based airborne virus disinfection and for optimizing the design and performance of UV air purification systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06746 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Benchmark design of ultraviolet irradiation air purifier for airborne viruses inactivation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Airborne Respiratory droplet example showing the effect of evaporation on altering the regular shape of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Rosin-Rammler (Weibull) saliva droplets size distribution at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (28 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coupled CFD of air flow with UV lamp irradiation for the predictions of infected saliva droplets dynam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CFD predictions of infected saliva droplets dynamics and UVC irradiance within an air purifier bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: CFD predictions of infected saliva droplets dynamics and UVC irradiance within an air purifier bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: CFD predictions of infected saliva droplets dynamics and UVC irradiance within an air purifier bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dehydration of saliva droplet that is undergoing a shape change from regular (sphere) to irregular shape [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) results for UV scattering in spherical shape dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) results for UV scattering in spherical shape dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) results for UV scattering in irregular shape dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) results for UV scattering in irregular shape dehydrated droplet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Impact of local UV scattering on the survival probability of viruses in airborne dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Impact of local UV scattering on the survival probability of viruses in airborne dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Impact of local UV scattering on the survival probability of viruses in airborne dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Impact of local UV scattering on the survival probability of viruses in airborne dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: An example of the evaporation process of initially emitted 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: An example of the evaporation process of initially emitted 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: An example of the effect of initial saliva size distribution on the survival of airborne viruses. Ratio of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: An example of the effect of initial saliva size distribution on the survival of airborne viruses. Ratio of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Initially 103 saliva droplets. An example of the effect of initial saliva size distribution on the survival of airborne viruses. Total survived virus copies Ns compared to total active copies Ntot as function of time. (red) initial PFD-a large size distribution, see f…
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Initially 103 saliva droplets. An example of the effect of initial saliva size distribution on the survival of airborne viruses. Total survived virus copies Ns compared to total active copies Ntot as function of time. (red) initial PFD-a large size distribution, see f…
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Effect of Initial Saliva Droplets Number on the Survival of Airborne Viruses. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Effect of UV Susceptibility constant Z (m 2/J) on the Survival of Airborne Viruses. Hξ =1. Results compared for two values of Z from the literature and for two walls-particles interactions laws "STICK" and "ESCAPE". Initially emitted 103 saliva droplets with initial P…
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: CFD predictions of infected saliva droplets dynamics and UVC irradiance within an air purifier bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: CFD predictions of infected saliva droplets dynamics and UVC irradiance within an air purifier bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: CFD predictions of infected saliva droplets dynamics and UVC irradiance within an air purifier bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_27.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Impact of local UV scattering on the survival probability of viruses in airborne dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_28.png]
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Impact of local UV scattering on the survival probability of viruses in airborne dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_29.png]
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Impact of local UV scattering on the survival probability of viruses in airborne dehydrated saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_30.png]
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: Impact of local UV scattering on the survival probability of viruses in airborne dehydrate saliva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_31.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Genetic material and sequence data to protect global health in the light of pandemic outbreaks: Mapping the legal landscape under european and international law

    Seitz Claudia. Genetic material and sequence data to protect global health in the light of pandemic outbreaks: Mapping the legal landscape under european and international law. European Journal of Health Law, 27(3): 232–241, 2020. doi: 10.1163/15718093-BJA10014

    work page doi:10.1163/15718093-bja10014 2020

  2. [2]

    Jeffrey A. McNeely. Nature and covid-19: The pandemic, the environment, and the way ahead. Am- bio, 50(4):767–781, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01447-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13280-020-01447-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01447-0 2021

  3. [3]

    Fluid dynamics and epidemiology: Seasonality and transmission dy- namics

    Talib Dbouk and Dimitris Drikakis. Fluid dynamics and epidemiology: Seasonality and transmission dy- namics. Physics of Fluids , 33(2):021901, 02 2021. ISSN 1070-6631. doi: 10.1063/5.0037640. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037640

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0037640 2021

  4. [4]

    On airborne virus transmission in elevators and confined spaces.Physics of Fluids, 33(1):011905, 01 2021

    Talib Dbouk and Dimitris Drikakis. On airborne virus transmission in elevators and confined spaces.Physics of Fluids, 33(1):011905, 01 2021. ISSN 1070-6631. doi: 10.1063/5.0038180. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0038180

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0038180 2021

  5. [5]

    On coughing and airborne droplet transmission to humans

    Talib Dbouk and Dimitris Drikakis. On coughing and airborne droplet transmission to humans. Physics of Fluids, 32(5):053310, 05 2020. ISSN 1070-6631. doi: 10.1063/5.0011960. URL https://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0011960

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0011960 2020

  6. [6]

    Weather impact on airborne coronavirus survival

    Talib Dbouk and Dimitris Drikakis. Weather impact on airborne coronavirus survival. Physics of Fluids, 32 (9):093312, 09 2020. ISSN 1070-6631. doi: 10.1063/5.0024272. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0024272

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0024272 2020

  7. [7]

    On pollen and airborne virus transmission

    Talib Dbouk and Dimitris Drikakis. On pollen and airborne virus transmission. Physics of Fluids , 33(6): 063313, 06 2021. ISSN 1070-6631. doi: 10.1063/5.0055845. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0055845

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0055845 2021

  8. [8]

    Kramer and Gerald J

    Kelby B. Kramer and Gerald J. Wang. Social distancing slows down steady dynamics in pedestrian flows. Physics of Fluids , 33(10):103318, 10 2021. ISSN 1070-6631. doi: 10.1063/5.0062331. URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0062331

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0062331 2021

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Uv-based tech- nologies for sars-cov2 inactivation: Status and perspectives

    Nicola Trivellin, Francesco Piva, Davide Fiorimonte, Matteo Buffolo, Carlo De Santi, Viviana Teresa Or- landi, Fabrizio Dughiero, Gaudenzio Meneghesso, Enrico Zanoni, and Matteo Meneghini. Uv-based tech- nologies for sars-cov2 inactivation: Status and perspectives. Electronics...

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Analytical modeling of three-stage inactivation of viruses within droplets and solid porous particles

    Faruk Alic. Analytical modeling of three-stage inactivation of viruses within droplets and solid porous particles. European Physical Journal Plus , 136(6):663, 2021. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01651-1. URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01651-1 . 46

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Marshall, R

    S. Marshall, R. Basile, D. Tanke, N. Francois, P. Nekolny, F. Duchaine, and S. Sankurantripati. Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation development method for transportation disinfection modelling. Engineering Mod- elling, Analysis and Simulation , 1, 8 2024. doi: 10.59972/zsj0dnh6...

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Sankurantripati, F

    S. Sankurantripati, F. Duchaine, N. Francois, S. Marshall, and P. Nekolny. Large eddy simulations to inves- tigate airborne virus inactivation using a ultraviolet air purifier with lagrangian tracking. Journal of Aerosol Science, 189:106642, 2025. ISSN 0021-8502. doi: https://...

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    Kim, and Hui Ouyang

    Deepak Sapkota, Yuhui Guo, Amrita Chakraborty, James Hu, Harris Xie, Ian Wu, Moon J. Kim, and Hui Ouyang. Organic components modulate the morphology of respirable aerovirology-relevant aerosols. Aerosol Science and Technology, 0(0):1–14, 2026. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2026.263780...

    2026 doi

  6. [14]

    Exhaled droplets due to talking and coughing

    Xiaojian Xie, Yuguo Li, Hequan Sun, and Li Liu. Exhaled droplets due to talking and coughing. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 6(6):S703–S714, 10 2009. ISSN 1742-5689. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0388.focus

    2009 doi

  7. [15]

    Z. Y . Han, W. G. Weng, and Q. Y . Huang. Characterizations of particle size distribution of the droplets exhaled by sneeze. Journal of The Royal Society Interface , 10(88):20130560, 11 2013. ISSN 1742-5689. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0560. URL https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0560

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    Wexler, Christopher D

    Sima Asadi, Anthony S. Wexler, Christopher D. Cappa, Santiago Barreda, Nicole M. Bouvier, and William D. Ristenpart. Effect of voicing and articulation manner on aerosol particle emission during hu- man speech. PLOS ONE , 15(1):e0227699, 2020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227699...

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    Marcus M. Jensen. Inactivation of airborne viruses by ultraviolet irradiation. Applied Microbiology, 12(5): 418–420, 1964. doi: 10.1128/am.12.5.418-420.1964. URL https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10. 1128/am.12.5.418-420.1964

    1964 doi

  10. [18]

    Walker and GwangPyo Ko

    Christopher M. Walker and GwangPyo Ko. Effect of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation on viral aerosols. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(15):5460–5465, 2007. doi: 10.1021/es070056u. URL https: //doi.org/10.1021/es070056u. PMID: 17822117

    2007 doi

  11. [19]

    Buchaklian, and Stanley Perlman

    Kurt Bedell, Albert H. Buchaklian, and Stanley Perlman. Efficacy of an automated multiple emitter whole- room ultraviolet-c disinfection system against coronaviruses mhv and mers-cov.Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 37(5):598–599, 2016. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.348. URL...

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    Bigelow, Ger- hard Randers-Pehrson, Gregory W

    David Welch, Manuela Buonanno, Vanja Grilj, Igor Shuryak, Curtis Crickmore, Ann W. Bigelow, Ger- hard Randers-Pehrson, Gregory W. Johnson, and David J. Brenner. Far-uvc light: A new tool to control the spread of airborne-mediated microbial diseases. Scientific Reports , 8(1):2...

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    Longest, Nicole C

    Alexandra K. Longest, Nicole C. Rockey, Seema S. Lakdawala, and Linsey C. Marr. Review of factors affect- ing virus inactivation in aerosols and droplets. Journal of The Royal Society Interface , 21(215):20240018, 06 2024. ISSN 1742-5689. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0018. URL https...

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Bax, Adriaan Bax, and Philip Anfinrud

    Valentyn Stadnytskyi, Christina E. Bax, Adriaan Bax, and Philip Anfinrud. The airborne lifetime of small speech droplets and their potential importance in sars-cov-2 transmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(22):11875–11877, 2020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200...

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    W. Weibull. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 18(3): 93–297, 1951

    1951

  16. [24]

    S. P. Humphrey and R. T. Williamson. A review of saliva: Normal composition, flow, and function. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 85(2):162–169, 2001. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113778

    2001 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    G. H. Carpenter. The secretion, components, and properties of saliva. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 4:267–276, 2013. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-030212-182700. 47

    2013 doi

  18. [26]

    Wyllie, John Fournier, Arnau Casanovas-Massana, Melissa Campbell, Maria Tokuyama, Pavithra Vijayakumar, Bertie Geng, M

    Anne L. Wyllie, John Fournier, Arnau Casanovas-Massana, Melissa Campbell, Maria Tokuyama, Pavithra Vijayakumar, Bertie Geng, M. Catherine Muenker, Adam J. Moore, Chantal B.F. V ogels, Mary E. Petrone, Isabel M. Ott, Peiwen Lu, Arvind Venkataraman, Alice Lu-Culligan, Jonathan K...

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Assessment of saliva interference with uv-based disinfection technologies.Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, 34:102281, 2021

    Julie Lavoie et al. Assessment of saliva interference with uv-based disinfection technologies.Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, 34:102281, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102281

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    W. E. Ranz and W. R. Marshall. Evaporation from drops, Part I. I. Chem. Engng. Prog., 48:141–146, 1952

    1952

  21. [29]

    W. E. Ranz and W. R. Marshall. Evaporation from drops, Part II. I. Chem. Engng. Prog., 48:173–180, 1952

    1952

  22. [30]

    Kariwa, N

    H. Kariwa, N. Fujii, and I. Takashima. Inactivation of sars coronavirus by means of povidone-iodine, physical conditions, and chemical reagents. Jpn J Vet Res., 52(3):105–12, 2004

    2004

  23. [31]

    Moukalled, L

    F. Moukalled, L. Mangani, and M. Darwish. The Finite Volume Method in Computational Fluid Dynamics: An Advanced Introduction with OpenFOAM and Matlab . Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1st edition, 2015. ISBN 3319168738

    2015

  24. [32]

    Openfoam: Open source cfd in research and industry

    Hrvoje Jasak. Openfoam: Open source cfd in research and industry. International Journal of Naval Archi- tecture and Ocean Engineering, 1(2):89 – 94, 2009. doi: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0011

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    P. J. Roache. Perspective: A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 116(3):405–413, 09 1994. ISSN 0098-2202. doi: 10.1115/1.2910291

    1994 doi

  26. [34]

    I. B. Celik, U. Ghia, P. J. Roache, and C. J. Freitas. Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130(7), 07 2008. doi: 10.1115/ 1.2960953

    2008

  27. [35]

    B. E. Launder and D. B. Spalding. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3(2):269–289, 1974. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2

    1974 doi

  28. [36]

    Robert Siegel and John R. Howell. Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer . Hemisphere Publishing, 3 edition,

  29. [37]

    Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation Handbook: UVGI for Air and Surface Disinfection

    Wladyslaw Kowalski. Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation Handbook: UVGI for Air and Surface Disinfection. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. ISBN 978-3-642-01998-2. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-01999-9

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    Michael F. Modest. Radiative Heat Transfer. Academic Press, 3 edition, 2013. ISBN 978-0-12-386944-9

    2013

  31. [39]

    On the light from the sky, its polarization and colour

    Lord Rayleigh. On the light from the sky, its polarization and colour. Philosophical Magazine, 41:107–120,

  32. [40]

    doi: 10.1080/14786447108640452

    doi

  33. [41]

    Beiträge zur optik trüber medien, speziell kolloidaler metallösungen

    Gustav Mie. Beiträge zur optik trüber medien, speziell kolloidaler metallösungen. Annalen der Physik, 330 (3):377–445, 1908. doi: 10.1002/andp.19083300302

    1908 doi

  34. [42]

    Dombrovsky, Sergei S

    Leonid A. Dombrovsky, Sergei S. Sazhin, Sergey V . Mikhalovsky, R. Wood, and Morgan R. Heikal. Spectral properties of diesel fuel droplets. Fuel, 82(1):15–22, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00200-4. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00200-4

    2003 doi

  35. [43]

    Dombrovsky and Sergei S

    Leonid A. Dombrovsky and Sergei S. Sazhin. Absorption of thermal radiation in a semi-transparent spherical droplet: A simplified model. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow , 24(6):919–927, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0142-727X(03)00084-5. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-727...

    2003 doi

  36. [44]

    Assessment of saliva interference with uv-based disinfection technologies

    Mathieu Bourgin et al. Assessment of saliva interference with uv-based disinfection technologies. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 217:112168, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112168. 48

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    Uv 254 nm is more efficient than uv 222 nm in inactivating sars-cov-2 present in human saliva

    Renata Sesti-Costa, Cyro von Zuben Negrão, Jacqueline Farinha Shimizu, Alice Nagai, Renata Spagolla Napoleão Tavares, Douglas Adamoski, Wanderley Costa, Marina Alves Fontoura, Thiago Jasso da Silva, Adriano de Barros, Alessandra Girasole, Murilo de Carvalho, Veronica de Carval...

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    Comparative study of far-uvc (222 nm) and germicidal uvc (254 nm) radiation against virus- laden aerosols of artificial human saliva

    Monika et al. Comparative study of far-uvc (222 nm) and germicidal uvc (254 nm) radiation against virus- laden aerosols of artificial human saliva. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2025. doi: 10.1016/ j.jphotobiol.2025.xxxxxx

    2025

  39. [47]

    Photonics of human saliva: potential optical methods for the screening of abnormal health conditions and infections

    Jijo Lukose, Sanoop Pavithran, Santhosh Chidangil, et al. Photonics of human saliva: potential optical methods for the screening of abnormal health conditions and infections. Biophysical Reviews, 13(3):359– 385, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12551-021-00807-8

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    Gundy, Charles P

    Ben Ma, Patricia M. Gundy, Charles P. Gerba, Mark D. Sobsey, and Karl G. Linden. Uv inactivation of sars-cov-2 across the uvc spectrum: Krcl* excimer, mercury-vapor, and light-emitting-diode (led) sources. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 87(22):e01532–21, 2021. doi: 10...

    2021 doi

  41. [49]

    Bohren and Donald R

    Craig F. Bohren and Donald R. Huffman. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles . Wiley, 1983

    1983

  42. [50]

    Yurkin and Alfons G

    Maxim A. Yurkin and Alfons G. Hoekstra. The discrete dipole approximation: An overview and recent developments. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 106(1–3):558–589, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.034. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.034

    2007 doi

  43. [51]

    Yurkin, Valeri P

    Maxim A. Yurkin, Valeri P. Maltsev, and Alfons G. Hoekstra. The discrete dipole approximation for simulation of light scattering by particles much larger than the wavelength. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer , 106(1–3):546–557, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.j...

    2007 doi

  44. [52]

    Yurkin, Valeri P

    Maxim A. Yurkin, Valeri P. Maltsev, and Alfons G. Hoekstra. Convergence of the discrete dipole approxi- mation. i. theoretical analysis. Journal of the Optical Society of America A , 23(10):2578–2591, 2006. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.23.002578. URL https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.23.002578

    2006 doi

  45. [53]

    Darnell, Kanta Subbarao, Stephen M

    Miriam E.R. Darnell, Kanta Subbarao, Stephen M. Feinstone, and Deborah R. Taylor. Inactivation of the coronavirus that induces severe acute respiratory syndrome, sars-cov. Journal of Virological Methods, 121 (1):85–91, 2004. ISSN 0166-0934. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviro...

    2004 doi

  46. [54]

    Beggs and Eli J

    Clive B. Beggs and Eli J. Avital. Upper-room ultraviolet air disinfection might help to reduce covid-19 transmission in buildings: A feasibility study. PeerJ, 8:e10196, 2020. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10196. URL https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10196. 49

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.