REVIEW 2 cited by
Chiral susceptibility and the scalar Ward identity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The chiral susceptibility is given by the scalar vacuum polarisation at zero total momentum. This follows directly from the expression for the vacuum quark condensate so long as a nonperturbative symmetry preserving truncation scheme is employed. For QCD in-vacuum the susceptibility can rigorously be defined via a Pauli-Villars regularisation procedure. Owing to the scalar Ward identity, irrespective of the form or Ansatz for the kernel of the gap equation, the consistent scalar vertex at zero total momentum can automatically be obtained and hence the consistent susceptibility. This enables calculation of the chiral susceptibility for markedly different vertex Ansaetze. For the two cases considered, the results were consistent and the minor quantitative differences easily understood. The susceptibility can be used to demarcate the domain of coupling strength within a theory upon which chiral symmetry is dynamically broken. Degenerate massless scalar and pseudoscalar bound-states appear at the critical coupling for dynamical chiral symmetry breaking.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Distribution amplitudes of heavy-light pseudo-scalar and vector mesons from Dyson-Schwinger equations framework
First DSE predictions for B*, B*_s, and B*_c distribution amplitudes show peaks near the Euclidean constituent quark mass ratio and a universal spin ordering.
-
$D^* D \pi$ and $B^* B \pi$ couplings from Dyson-Schwinger equations framework
A Dyson-Schwinger/Bethe-Salpeter calculation predicts g_D*Dpi = 16.22 and g_B*Bpi = 40.09, with static couplings consistent with lattice results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.