Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 38 references

Tightening energetic bounds on linear gyrokinetic instabilities

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An energetic norm built from the complete linear-mode basis makes optimal-mode growth exactly equal eigenmode growth.

desk verdict The constrained optimal modes are the real contribution and look correct in slab geometry, but the paper's claim of a rigorous upper bound needs a proof that the quartic-root search actually finds the global maximum. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.17757 v1 pith:2XNOVH4N submitted 2025-05-23 physics.plasm-ph

P.J. Costello , G.G. Plunk This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords energeticboundsgyrokineticsslabITGCase–VanKampenmodesoptimalfreeenergylineargrowthratecriticalgradient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how tightly linear gyrokinetic instability growth can be bounded from above by the growth of optimal modes of an energetic norm, and it sharpens the answer in two steps. The authors first construct the Case–Van Kampen energy, a positive norm built from the projection coefficients of the perturbed distribution onto the complete basis of discrete and continuum linear modes, and prove that its optimal-mode growth rates are exactly the linear eigenmode growth rates: $\Lambda=\gamma_n$ for each discrete mode and $\Lambda=0$ for the continuum. They then abandon the need for full spectral knowledge and derive constrained optimal modes that maximise Helmholtz free-energy growth subject only to two moment constraints and an energy-balance constraint that all linear eigenmodes satisfy. Solving that variational problem reduces to a quartic polynomial whose maximum over the real frequency reproduces the slab ITG critical gradient $\kappa_{\parallel,\mathrm{cr}}=\sqrt{2\tau(1+\tau)}$, as well as density-gradient stabilisation and finite-Larmor-radius dependence. If these claims hold, energetic bounding becomes a tight and computationally cheap way to predict linear instability thresholds and growth rates without solving the eigenmode problem.

What carries the argument

Two objects carry the argument. The Case–Van Kampen energy is a diagonal norm in the complete set of linear modes; its balance law $dE/dt=2\sum_n\gamma_n|a_n|^2$ turns the optimal-mode variational problem (3.19) into the exact eigenvalue $\Lambda=\gamma_n$. The practical machinery is the constrained optimal-mode problem: maximize the free-energy drive $D$ subject to (4.9), (4.10), and (4.12), constraints that encode eigenmode phase relations between moments and free-energy balance; projecting the Euler–Lagrange equation onto the density and flow moments reduces it to the quartic (4.16), and the bound is $\Lambda_{\max}=\max_{\omega'_r}\Lambda$ over real roots.

What would settle it

A direct numerical search for a distribution function that satisfies constraints (4.9), (4.10), and (4.12) with free-energy growth above the quartic maximum would falsify the bound; equivalently, finding parameters where the slab ITG dispersion relation (A1) has a positive growth rate but the quartic (4.16) has no real positive root would show the constrained bound loses the instability.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that loose energetic bounds are not a fundamental limitation: there exists a norm—the Case–Van Kampen energy $E=\sum_n |a_n|^2+\int |A(\omega)|^2 d\omega$—whose instantaneous optimal growth spectrum coincides with the linear eigenmode growth spectrum, giving equality in $\gamma \le \Lambda_{\max}$. Because the norm is diagonal in the eigenmode basis, transient growth is absent and the Landau-damped continuum does not decay the norm. For practical bounds, the paper shows that retaining just the real-frequency phase information through constrained optimal modes—maximising Helmholtz free-energy growth subject to eigenmode-like relations between density, flow, and higher moment plus free-energy balance $D=\gamma' H$—yields an upper bound that tracks the linear slab ITG growth rate, including a critical gradient and stabilization by density gradients that earlier nonlinear bounds missed.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise for the practical bound is that the feasible set defined by (4.9), (4.10), and (4.12) contains all linear eigenmodes, and that the maximum over real $\omega'_r$ of the real roots of (4.16) is the true supremum of free-energy growth on that set; the first part is plausible for eigenmodes, but the second is asserted rather than proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The slab ITG critical gradient $\kappa_{\parallel,\mathrm{cr}}=\sqrt{2\tau(1+\tau)}$ follows from a two-moment variational bound, with no need to solve the kinetic dispersion relation.
  • Enlarging the number of moment constraints should tighten the bound toward the largest linear growth rate, because in the infinite-constraint limit the feasible set collapses to the linear eigenmodes.
  • In any system where the Case–Van Kampen energy is a nonlinear invariant, linear stability implies nonlinear stability, since $\Lambda=0$ for all perpendicular wavenumbers means subcritical turbulence cannot occur.
  • The constrained bound depends on the real frequency $\omega'_r$, so resonant stabilisation and density-gradient stabilisation enter through the optimization parameter rather than through an ad hoc closure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-moment construction could be tried in toroidal geometry, where the continuum structure differs; a critical-gradient match there would be strong evidence the bound is capturing resonance physics rather than being a slab-specific accident.
  • The gap between $\Lambda_{\max}$ and $\gamma_{\max}$ for simpler norms can now be read as a measure of non-normality, since the Case–Van Kampen result suggests the gap is a property of the chosen norm, not of the linear operator itself.
  • A numerical implementation with an arbitrary number of Hermite–Laguerre moment constraints would give a tunable, rigorously valid upper bound that could be tested against linear gyrokinetic codes before being used in stellarator optimization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper addresses the question of how tightly instantaneous energetic norms can bound the linear growth of gyrokinetic instabilities, using the slab ion-temperature-gradient (ITG) mode as a testbed. In Section 3, the authors reduce the linear gyrokinetic equation to a one-dimensional integral equation (3.1), invoke the Case-Van Kampen completeness theorem, and define a Case-Van Kampen energy E = sum_n |a_n|^2 + integral |A(omega)|^2 domega whose balance is dE/dt = 2 sum_n gamma_n |a_n|^2. The associated optimal-mode problem has solutions Lambda = gamma_n and Lambda = 0, so the tightest possible energetic bound coincides with the eigenmode growth spectrum, a result the authors themselves describe as a somewhat trivial consequence of diagonalisation. In Section 4, they construct constrained optimal modes that maximise Helmholtz free-energy growth subject to moment constraints and a free-energy balance constraint satisfied by linear eigenmodes. This leads to a quartic equation (4.16) for Lambda after maximising over the real frequency parameter omega'_r. Numerical comparisons in Figures 1-3 show that the constrained bound reproduces qualitative features of the linear growth rate, including the critical gradient kappa_{||,cr} = sqrt(2 tau (1+tau)), density-gradient stabilisation, and finite-Larmor-radius effects.

Significance. If the missing technical details are supplied, the paper would make two valuable contributions. First, it cleanly demonstrates that the looseness of previous energetic bounds is not a fundamental limitation: an energy norm built from eigenmode projection coefficients can make optimal growth and linear eigenmode growth coincide. Second, the constrained optimal mode construction is a low-dimensional, computationally efficient way to include real-frequency (phase) information in a variational bound, and the exact reproduction of the slab ITG critical gradient is a nontrivial and encouraging result. The paper also correctly situates the tightest-bound result as an existence statement about norms rather than a practical algorithm, since the Case-Van Kampen energy requires full spectral knowledge. The main load-bearing issue is that the 'rigorous upper bound' claim for the constrained optimal modes is not fully proven: the passage from the Lagrangian stationarity conditions to the global maximum over real omega'_r requires an attainment proof that is currently absent.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (4.16)] The identification of Lambda_max with the maximum over real omega'_r of the real roots of the quartic (4.16) is not justified as a rigorous upper bound. The Lagrangian (4.13) yields only first-order necessary conditions for interior extrema of the constrained problem; no compactness argument, constraint-qualification check, or analysis of boundaries (e.g., vanishing of one of the moments kappa_i or |omega'_r| tending to infinity) is provided, and complex roots are discarded without showing that the true supremum of D/H over the feasible set defined by (4.9), (4.10), and (4.12) is attained at a stationary point with a real Lambda. If the supremum is realised at a non-stationary point or at infinity, the computed Lambda_max could fall below the free-energy growth rate of a genuine linear eigenmode, invalidating the claimed bound. Please add an existence and attainment proof, or an explicit boundary and infinity analysis that rules out this failure.
  2. [Appendix B and Appendix C] The reduction from the Lagrangian (4.13) and the moment system (B 4)-(B 8) to the quartic (4.16) is only sketched; Appendix C lists the coefficients P, Q, and R but does not show the elimination steps. Since all numerical results in Figures 1-3 and the critical-gradient formula depend on equation (4.16), a full derivation (or a supplementary computer-algebra script) is needed for reproducibility and to verify that no non-generic cases, such as denominators involving 1 + tau - G_perp0 or eta vanishing, have been silently excluded.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix B, final line] The definition 'tilde_lambda_3,4 = lambda_2,3 / (n T_i omega_* eta (1 - lambda_1))' appears to contain an index typo; presumably tilde_lambda_2 and tilde_lambda_3 are intended.
  2. [Section 4.1.1] The limit 'b -> 0 with eta -> infinity' is ambiguous because the plotted parameter kappa_|| = omega_* eta / (v_T k_||) is held fixed; please specify the ordering, e.g., eta -> infinity with omega_* -> 0 at fixed omega_* eta.
  3. [Section 3.2] The statement that the optimal modes are exactly the linear eigenmodes would benefit from a short direct verification that f_n satisfies the generalised eigenvalue problem (3.19); the projection argument shows the necessary value of Lambda but not explicitly that f_n is a solution.
  4. [Section 5] Because the abstract and introduction present the tightest possible bound as a main result, the conclusions should state explicitly that this bound is not practically computable without solving the linear problem, serving as an existence proof rather than a predictive tool.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Section 3's 'tightest bound' is definitional: the Case–Van Kampen energy is built from eigenmode projection coefficients, so optimal growth equals eigenmode growth by construction; Section 4's constrained optimal modes are independent and non-circular.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.1–3.2, Eqs. (3.16)–(3.23)]
    "by combining (3.14) and (3.15) we can construct what we will refer to as the Case–Van Kampen energy, which we define as, E = ∑_n |a_n(t)|^2 + ∫ |A(ω,t)|^2 dω. ... This may feel like a somewhat trivial consequence of the diagonalisation of the linear operator by the linear eigenmodes."

    Equation (3.16) defines E directly from the coefficients a_n and A(ω) of the eigenfunction expansion (3.9), so the growth law (3.17) is merely the weighted sum of eigenvalues. The optimal-mode problem (3.19)–(3.21) is built from the same projection coefficients, and the orthogonality relations collapse the generalized eigenvalue problem to Λ = γ_n. Thus the 'tightest possible bound' and one-to-one correspondence are restatements of the diagonalization: the result is contained in the definition of E. The authors explicitly flag it as 'a somewhat trivial consequence,' confirming the reduction. This is transparent definitional circularity, not a fitted-parameter substitution.

full rationale

The Section 3 result is the only circular/definitional step. The Case–Van Kampen energy E is defined as the sum of squared projection coefficients of the linear eigenmode basis, so the balance dE/dt = 2∑γ_n|a_n|^2 and the optimal-mode solution Λ=γ_n are already contained in the construction. The authors themselves call it 'a somewhat trivial consequence of the diagonalisation,' which confirms the reduction. This does not invalidate the paper: it is an honest, explicitly disclosed identity, and the subsequent constrained-optimal-mode construction in Section 4 is genuinely non-circular—its constraints are necessary conditions for eigenmodes, not the eigenmode solution itself, and the resulting bounds are compared to the independent linear dispersion relation (A1). The skeptic's concern that Λ_max might not be attained by real roots of (4.16) is a rigor issue about the variational maximum, not a circularity. Overall score 6 reflects that one of the two headline claims is true by construction, while the practically useful bound is independent and self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The exact-bound claim rests on completeness of the Case-Van Kampen eigenmode expansion, which is imported from the literature. The constrained-mode claim rests on the assumption that low-order moment and energy-balance constraints define a superset of the true eigenmodes, plus a variational construction with a free real frequency parameter. No numbers are fitted to data; omega'_r is maximized over rather than inferred.

free parameters (2)
  • omega'_r (constrained-mode real frequency)
    Variational parameter that must be maximized over to obtain Lambda_max; not fitted to the linear dispersion relation.
  • Arbitrary weights in Case-Van Kampen energy = arbitrary
    The paper notes E may be defined with arbitrary weights on each amplitude coefficient; this flexibility is mentioned but not used in the numerical comparisons.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The discrete plus continuum Case-Van Kampen eigenmodes form a complete basis for the linear operator of Eq. (3.1), with orthogonality relations (3.10)-(3.11).
    Needed for expansion (3.9) and for E to be a positive norm; cited from Case (1959), not proved in the paper.
  • domain assumption Slab geometry reduction: uniform magnetic field, single Fourier mode k_parallel, adiabatic electrons, single ion species.
    Reduces the gyrokinetic equation to (2.1)-(2.3); stated but not physically justified beyond the assumption that this captures the slab ITG mode.
  • domain assumption Every linear eigenmode satisfies the moment constraints (4.9)-(4.10) and energy balance D = gamma H (4.12).
    This is what puts true eigenmodes inside the feasible set; it is argued from the eigenmode form but not proved in detail.
  • ad hoc to paper The global maximum over omega'_r of the real roots of (4.16) yields the true supremum of Lambda over the constrained set.
    The paper discards complex roots and maximizes numerically without proving that the supremum is attained at a real root in all parameter regimes; necessary for the claim that Lambda_max is the upper bound.
invented entities (1)
  • Case-Van Kampen energy E = sum_n |a_n|^2 + integral |A(omega)|^2 domega
    purpose: Define a norm whose instantaneous growth equals the projection-weighted sum of linear eigenmode growth rates, yielding the tightest possible energetic bound.
    Constructed from the complete linear eigenmode basis; cannot be evaluated without solving the eigenproblem, so it has no independent falsifiable handle and is a definitional mathematical object.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tightening energetic bounds on linear gyrokinetic instabilities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2XNOVH4N

@misc{pith2026250517757,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tightening energetic bounds on linear gyrokinetic instabilities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2XNOVH4N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.17757}
}
read the original abstract

Bounding energetic growth of gyrokinetic instabilities is a complementary approach to linear instability analyses involving normal eigenmodes. Previous work has focused on upper bounds which are valid linearly and nonlinearly. However, if an upper bound on linear instability growth is desired, these nonlinearly valid bounds may be a poor predictor of the growth of the most unstable eigenmode. This is most evident for the simplest of instabilities: the ion-temperature-gradient (ITG) mode in slab geometry. In this work, we derive energetic upper bounds specifically for linear instability growth, focusing on the slab ITG. We show that there is no fundamental limitation on how tightly linear growth can be bounded by an energetic norm, with the tightest possible bound being given by a special energy comprised of projection coefficients of the linear eigenmode basis. Additionally, we consider `constrained optimal modes' that maximise energy growth subject to constraints that are also obeyed by the linear eigenmodes. This yields computationally efficient upper bounds that closely resemble the linear growth rate, capturing effects connected to the real frequency of instabilities, which have been absent in the energetic bounds considered thus far.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.17757 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Upper bound on linear growth (blue) alongside the linear growth rate (dashed black) from the linear dispersion relation (A 1), plotted as a function of the instability parameter κk in the low-k⊥ limit with η → ∞ and τ = 1. Also shown is the fluid-limit dispersion relation (dot-dashed red) (Plunk et al. 2014), which diverges as κk → 0. The vertical light-grey dashed line is the critical gradient of Kadomtsev & Poguts… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Upper bound on linear growth (blue) alongside the linear growth rate (dashed black) from the linear dispersion relation (A 1), plotted as a function of 1/η in the low-k⊥ limit with τ = 1. Here, both the upper bound and the linear growth rate have been maximised over kk. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Upper bound on linear growth (blue) alongside the linear growth rate (dashed black) from the linear dispersion relation (A 1) and the nonlinear bound of Helander & Plunk (2022); Plunk & Helander (2023) (dashed grey), plotted as a function of k⊥ρ in the limit of η → ∞ for τ = 1, where both the constrained upper bound and the linear growth rate have been maximised over kk. nonlinear bounds of Helander & Plunk (2022); … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year eprint label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    & Landreman, Matt 2025 Machine-learning Closure for Vlasov-Poisson Dynamics in Fourier-Hermite Space , arXiv:arXiv: 2504.13313

    Barbour, Nathaniel , Dorland, William , Abel, Ian G. & Landreman, Matt 2025 Machine-learning Closure for Vlasov-Poisson Dynamics in Fourier-Hermite Space , arXiv:arXiv: 2504.13313

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    , Parra, F

    Barnes, M. , Parra, F. I. , Highcock, E. G. , Schekochihin, A. A. , Cowley, S. C. & Roach, C. M. 2011 Turbulent Transport in Tokamak Plasmas with Rotational Shear . Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (17), 175004

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    , Diamond, P

    Biglari, H. , Diamond, P. H. & Rosenbluth, M. N. 1989 Toroidal ion-pressure-gradient-driven drift instabilities and transport revisited . Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics 1 (1), 109--118

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    , Garbet, X

    Bourdelle, C. , Garbet, X. , Imbeaux, F. , Casati, A. , Dubuit, N. , Guirlet, R. & Parisot, T. 2007 A new gyrokinetic quasilinear transport model applied to particle transport in tokamak plasmas . Physics of Plasmas 14 (11), 112501

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Braginskii, S. I. 1965 Transport Processes in a Plasma . Reviews of Plasma Physics 1 , 205

    work page 1965

  8. [8]

    M 1959 Plasma oscillations

    Case, K. M 1959 Plasma oscillations . Annals of Physics 7 (3), 349--364

    work page 1959

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Costello, P. J. & Plunk, G. G. 2024 Energetic bounds on gyrokinetic instabilities. Part 4. Bounce-averaged electrons, arXiv:arXiv: 2404.06081

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Physics of Plasmas 12 (7), 072309

    Dannert, Tilman & Jenko, Frank 2005 Gyrokinetic simulation of collisionless trapped-electron mode turbulence . Physics of Plasmas 12 (7), 072309

    2005

  3. [11]

    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 61 (9), 1086--1091

    DelSole, Timothy 2004 The Necessity of Instantaneous Optimals in Stationary Turbulence . Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 61 (9), 1086--1091

    2004

  4. [12]

    Frei, B. J. , Hoffmann, A. C. D. , Ricci, P. , Brunner, S. & Tecchioll, Z. 2023 Moment-based approach to the flux-tube linear gyrokinetic model . Journal of Plasma Physics 89 (4), 905890414

    2023

  5. [13]

    & Perkins, Francis W

    Hammett, Gregory W. & Perkins, Francis W. 1990 Fluid moment models for Landau damping with application to the ion-temperature-gradient instability . Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (25), 3019--3022

    1990

  6. [14]

    Hatch, D R , Jenko, F , Navarro, A Ba \ n \'o n , Bratanov, V , Terry, P W & Pueschel, M J 2016 Linear signatures in nonlinear gyrokinetics: Interpreting turbulence with pseudospectra . New J. Phys. 18 (7), 075018

    2016

  7. [15]

    Hatch, D. R. , Terry, P. W. , Jenko, F. , Merz, F. & Nevins, W. M. 2011 Saturation of Gyrokinetic Turbulence through Damped Eigenmodes . Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (11), 115003

    2011

  8. [16]

    & Plunk, G

    Helander, P. & Plunk, G. G. 2021 Upper Bounds on Gyrokinetic Instabilities in Magnetized Plasmas . Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (15), 155001

    2021

  9. [17]

    & Plunk, G

    Helander, P. & Plunk, G. G. 2022 Energetic bounds on gyrokinetic instabilities. Part 1. Fundamentals . Journal of Plasma Physics 88 (2), 905880207

    2022

  10. [18]

    Heninger, J. M. & Morrison, P. J. 2018 An integral transform technique for kinetic systems with collisions . Physics of Plasmas 25 (8), 082118

    2018

  11. [19]

    Huang, Ziyu , Dong, Chuanfei & Wang, Liang 2025 Machine-learning heat flux closure for multi-moment fluid modeling of nonlinear Landau damping . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (11), e2419073122 , arXiv:arXiv: 2503.11090

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kadomtsev, B. B. & Pogutse, O. P. 1970 Turbulence in Toroidal Systems . In Reviews of Plasma Physics \/ (ed. M. A. Leontovich ) , pp. 249--400 . Boston, MA: Springer US

    1970

  13. [21]

    , Merz, F

    Kammerer, M. , Merz, F. & Jenko, F. 2008 Exceptional points in linear gyrokinetics . Physics of Plasmas 15 (5), 052102 , arXiv:arXiv: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pop/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2909618/14083208/052102\_1\_online.pdf

    2008 doi

  14. [22]

    , Liu, X

    Kotschenreuther, M. , Liu, X. , Mahajan, S.M. , Hatch, D.R. & Merlo, G. 2024 Transport Barriers in magnetized plasmas- general theory with dynamical constraints . Nucl. Fusion 64 (7), 076033

    2024

  15. [23]

    1997 Submarginal profiles and turbulent transport: An exactly solvable model

    Krommes, John A. 1997 Submarginal profiles and turbulent transport: An exactly solvable model . Physics of Plasmas 4 (5), 1342--1356

    1997

  16. [24]

    1946 On electron plasma oscillations

    Landau, L.D. 1946 On electron plasma oscillations . Sov. Phys. JETP 16 , 574

    1946

  17. [25]

    , Plunk, G

    Landreman, M. , Plunk, G. G. & Dorland, W. 2015 Generalized universal instability: Transient linear amplification and subcritical turbulence . Journal of Plasma Physics 81 (5), 905810501

    2015

  18. [26]

    Mandell, N. R. , Dorland, W. , Abel, I. , Gaur, R. , Kim, P. , Martin, M. & Qian, T. 2024 GX : A GPU-native gyrokinetic turbulence code for tokamak and stellarator design . Journal of Plasma Physics 90 (4), 905900402

    2024

  19. [27]

    Mandell, N. R. , Dorland, W. & Landreman, M. 2018 Laguerre-- Hermite pseudo-spectral velocity formulation of gyrokinetics . Journal of Plasma Physics 84 (1), 905840108

    2018

  20. [28]

    Morrison, P. J. & Pfirsch, D. 1992 Dielectric energy versus plasma energy, and Hamiltonian action-angle variables for the Vlasov equation . Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics 4 (10), 3038--3057

    1992

  21. [29]

    Plunk, G. G. 2013 Landau damping in a turbulent setting . Physics of Plasmas 20 (3), 032304

    2013

  22. [30]

    Plunk, G. G. 2015 On the nonlinear stability of a quasi-two-dimensional drift kinetic model for ion temperature gradient turbulence . Physics of Plasmas 22 (4), 042305

    2015

  23. [31]

    Plunk, G. G. & Helander, P. 2022 Energetic bounds on gyrokinetic instabilities. Part 2. Modes of optimal growth . Journal of Plasma Physics 88 (3), 905880313

    2022

  24. [32]

    Plunk, G. G. & Helander, P. 2023 Energetic bounds on gyrokinetic instabilities. Part 3. Generalized free energy . Journal of Plasma Physics 89 (4), 905890419

    2023

  25. [33]

    Plunk, G. G. , Helander, P. , Xanthopoulos, P. & Connor, J. W. 2014 Collisionless microinstabilities in stellarators. III . The ion-temperature-gradient mode . Physics of Plasmas 21 (3), 032112

    2014

  26. [34]

    , Plunk, G

    Podavini, L. , Plunk, G. G. , Helander, P. & Zocco, A. 2024 Energetic bounds on gyrokinetic instabilities. Part V . Contrasting optimal and normal modes over the geometric landscape . To be published in Journal of Plasma Physics

    2024

  27. [35]

    Pueschel, M. J. , Faber, B. J. , Citrin, J. , Hegna, C. C. , Terry, P. W. & Hatch, D. R. 2016 Stellarator Turbulence : Subdominant Eigenmodes and Quasilinear Modeling . Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (8), 085001

    2016

  28. [36]

    Roberg-Clark , G. T. , Plunk, G. G. , Xanthopoulos, P. , N \"u hrenberg, C. , Henneberg, S. A. & Smith, H. M. 2023 Critical gradient turbulence optimization toward a compact stellarator reactor concept . Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (3), L032030

    2023

  29. [37]

    & Felderhof, B.U

    van Kampen , N.G. & Felderhof, B.U. 1967 Theoretical Methods in Plasma Physics\/ . North-Holland Publishing Company

    1967

  30. [38]

    , Highcock, E

    van Wyk, F. , Highcock, E. G. , Schekochihin, A. A. , Roach, C. M. , Field, A. R. & Dorland, W. 2016 Transition to subcritical turbulence in a tokamak plasma . Journal of Plasma Physics 82 (6), 905820609

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.