Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

The particle spectra of parity-violating theories: A less radical approach and an upgrade of PSALTer

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For any parity-violating tensorial field theory, absence of massive ghosts is equivalent to the kinetic matrix of each spin sector being negative-definite, so no propagator inversion or radical handling is needed.

desk verdict Useful methods paper with real PSALTer upgrade, but the claimed equivalence behind the new no-ghost criterion is not established — a missing range condition prevents the block diagonalization from being an identity. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02111 v1 pith:2YBGBIJX submitted 2025-06-02 hep-th gr-qchep-ph

Will Barker , Georgios K. Karananas , Haochen Tu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qchep-ph
keywords parityviolationparticlespectrumspin-projectionoperatorsghostfreedomEinstein-CartangravityPoincarégaugetheoryMoore-PenrosepseudoinversePSALTer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Parity-violating theories of gravity have been largely left out of model building because their particle spectra are hard to compute: when several massive modes share a spin sector, the squared masses are often irrational functions of the Lagrangian couplings, which makes the standard residue test for ghosts impractical. This paper claims that the no-ghost condition can be reduced to a simple matrix test: after the kinetic mixing between massive and massless modes is removed, the kinetic matrix of the massive modes must be negative-definite, $K_J<0$. This criterion is necessarily equivalent to the residue condition, but it requires neither inverting the wave operator nor manipulating radicals. The paper extends the PSALTer software to parity-violating spin-projection operators and applies the criterion to the most general parity-indefinite Einstein-Cartan/Poincaré gravity that propagates the massless graviton plus two scalar modes, showing it is ghost- and tachyon-free under explicit inequalities. If correct, the method opens a previously intractable class of parity-violating gravitational theories to systematic study.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the spin-projection operator (SPO) decomposition of the wave operator into per-spin coefficient matrices $O_J$, extended to parity-violating theories by allowing off-diagonal SPOs that mix opposite parities and are skew-Hermitian, which gives $O_J$ a 'chequer-Hermitian' block structure. The key step is a block triangularization of the reordered matrix $o_J$ using the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse of the massless block $o_{J\gamma}$; the massive block becomes the Schur complement $K_J k^2 + M_J$. The no-ghost condition then reduces to negative-definiteness of $K_J$, which bypasses propagator inversion and residue computation entirely and avoids radicals when masses are irrational functions of the couplings.

What would settle it

Take the parity-indefinite Einstein-Cartan theory of Eq. (29), compute the full saturated propagator, and evaluate the residues at the two massive scalar poles; compare their positivity with the $K_0<0$ condition of Eq. (33) over a scan of coupling values. Any point where the two criteria disagree would disprove the claimed equivalence between $K_J<0$ and the residue condition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for each spin sector $J$ of a free parity-violating tensor theory, the wave-operator coefficient matrix can be block-triangularized by a transformation built from the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse of the massless block, and the massive part then takes the form $K_J k^2 + M_J$. The no-ghost criterion is simply $K_J<0$: the kinetic matrix must be negative-definite, and this is necessarily equivalent to positivity of the propagator residues at all massive poles. In the parity-preserving limit the criterion reduces to the known residue formula, while in parity-violating sectors it reproduces previously known conditions without any computation of radicals. On this basis the paper shows that the most general parity-indefinite Einstein-Cartan action that propagates only the graviton and two scalar modes is unitary provided $c_1<0$, $c_5>0$, $4c_3c_5-c_4^2>0$, and two further inequalities that exclude tachyons.

Load-bearing premise

The core assumption is that the kinetic mixing between massive and massless modes can always be removed algebraically without losing or disguising any unhealthy mode, so that checking the remaining massive kinetic matrix is enough to decide ghost-freedom.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Massive-sector ghost checks become matrix inequalities that depend rationally on the Lagrangian couplings, so they remain practical even when the squared masses themselves are irrational.
  • The PSALTer software can now analyze parity-violating tensor theories, including the new parity-violating spin-projection operators for the $J=0,1,2$ sectors, and it automatically identifies gauge generators and source constraints.
  • For the most general parity-indefinite Einstein-Cartan theory with only a graviton and two scalars, the conditions $c_1<0$, $c_5>0$, $4c_3c_5-c_4^2>0$, together with the tachyon inequalities in Eq. (38), guarantee a unitary particle content.
  • The residue criterion in Eq. (16) reduces to the known parity-preserving criterion when parity is definite, so the new method extends rather than replaces the standard analysis.
  • The same algorithm applies to p-form and Cremmer-Scherk-Kalb-Ramond toy models as well as to gravity, confirming that it is a general tool for parity-violating tensor theories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper notes that the $K_J<0$ criterion is not yet implemented in PSALTer; a natural next step would be to have the software emit no-ghost conditions directly as polynomial inequalities, which would automate the entire pipeline.
  • The same block-triangularization logic should apply to parity-violating metric-affine gravity, which the paper explicitly identifies as unexplored; this could yield a systematic survey of healthy parity-violating MAG models.
  • The equivalence of $K_J<0$ with residue positivity suggests that chequer-Hermitian structure is the right organizing principle for parity-violating propagator calculations generally, possibly extending beyond spectra to effective actions or unitarity bounds.
  • Testing the new parity-violating SPO construction for $J=2$ against an independent Hamiltonian analysis of a parity-violating higher-spin model would provide a direct check of the formalism beyond the EC examples calibrated here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper upgrades the PSALTer software package to handle parity-violating tensor field theories, introducing parity-violating spin-projection operators and a chequer-Hermitian matrix formalism. Its central technical novelty is a proposed shortcut for detecting massive ghosts: instead of computing propagator residues at massive poles (which is difficult when masses are irrational functions of the couplings), the authors claim that one can block-diagonalize the wave-operator coefficient matrix and impose negative-definiteness of the resulting kinetic matrix K_J (Eq. (20)), and that this is necessarily equivalent to the standard residue criterion (Eq. (16)). The method is illustrated on p-form toy models and on a parity-indefinite Einstein–Cartan/Poincaré gravity theory, where it reproduces the known conditions for two healthy massive scalars. Appendix G provides an independent analytic derivation for the Einstein–Cartan example, and Appendix H calibrates the software against the results of [24] and [26].

Significance. If the main equivalence were rigorously established, the proposed criterion would be a practically valuable tool: it would allow no-ghost conditions to be extracted without inverting the wave operator or evaluating residues, even when masses are irrational functions of the couplings. The paper also delivers a concrete software upgrade with reproducible, open-source code, and it provides independent analytic cross-checks in Appendix G as well as successful calibration against earlier results in [24,26]. No quantities are fitted and no target result is assumed as input; these are genuine strengths. However, the general claim underlying the new algorithm currently rests on an unproven factorization step, so the advertised scope exceeds what is demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IIC, Eq. (18)] The factorization oJ = [[1, oJmγ oJγ+],[0,1]] [[oJm - oJmγ oJγ+ oJγm, 0],[0, oJγ]] [[1,0],[oJγ+ oJγm,1]] is asserted without proof, and direct multiplication shows it is not an identity for arbitrary blocks. The (1,2) block of the product is oJmγ oJγ+ oJγ, which equals oJmγ only if oJmγ lies in the row space of oJγ, and similarly the (2,1) block requires oJγm to lie in the column space of oJγ. These range conditions are neither stated nor verified. A concrete counterexample within the same block structure is oJm = k^2 + m^2, oJγ = diag(k^2,0), and oJmγ = (a,b) with b≠0; then det oJ = -b^2 k^2, so there is no massive pole, while the formal Schur complement is not of the form K_J k^2 + M_J and K_J < 0 carries no information about any residue. Thus the asserted equivalence of Eq. (20) and Eq. (16) is not established for the general class of theories claimed in the text.
  2. [Section IIC, Eqs. (17)-(20)] The reduction to K_J < 0 also assumes that the massless block oJγ can be eliminated without hiding ghost content. When oJγ has gauge null directions or zero eigenvalues, the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse does not automatically preserve the sign structure of the massive sector, and it is possible for the mixing to remove or create poles. The paper should state explicitly the hypotheses under which the Schur complement captures the full massive spectrum, and should prove or disprove them for the local Lagrangians covered by PSALTer. The Einstein–Cartan application may survive because it is independently calibrated in Appendix G, but the text presents Eq. (20) as valid for any parity-violating tensorial theory, which is stronger than what is shown.
  3. [Section IIC, paragraph after Eq. (20)] The sentence 'The condition in Eq. (20) is necessarily equivalent to that in Eq. (16)' is too strong given the unproven range conditions. At minimum this statement should be replaced by a theorem with explicit assumptions, and the counterexample above should be acknowledged or excluded. Without this, the advertised advantage of avoiding radicals is only conditional: K_J and M_J are rational/polynomial only when the Schur complement has the stated polynomial structure.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction, after Eq. (1)] There are several typographical errors, including 'PSALTersoftware' in the abstract and 'the the' in the text; these should be corrected in a final pass.
  2. [References] Reference [47] lists 'A. Tu' while the author list of this paper has 'H. Tu'; please verify the correct spelling.
  3. [Table I] The entries 'Z≥' and 'Z>' are not defined; please clarify the notation for non-negative and positive integers.
  4. [Section IIIB2, Eq. (31)] The displayed dimensions of o0mγ and o0γm are ambiguous; adding explicit block dimensions would make the Schur-complement computation easier to follow.
  5. [Appendix G] The phrase 'Eq. Eq. (24)' appears at the start of the zero-by-three CSKR subsection; this should be a single 'Eq. (24)'.
  6. [Code listings] Some code listings contain '(*omitted 3222 characters for brevity*)'; please ensure the complete inputs are available in the supplemental materials so the presented results are reproducible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the no-ghost criterion is derived by linear algebra and the EC results are independently calibrated; Eq. (18)'s unproven range condition is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the no-ghost condition can be recast as negative-definiteness of the Schur-complement kinetic matrix K_J (Eq. (20)) without computing propagator residues. This is a mathematical equivalence claim, not a fitted prediction: K_J is defined from the wave-operator blocks via Eqs. (18)-(19), and Eq. (16) is derived independently in Appendix F from the residue of the saturated propagator. Nothing is fitted to the target spectrum, and no target result is assumed as an input. The skeptical concern that the factorization (18) requires Moore-Penrose range conditions (oJmγ = oJmγ oJγ+ oJγ and oJγm = oJγ oJγ+ oJγm) is a gap in the proof of the equivalence, not a circularity: the paper does not define K_J in terms of Eq. (16) or vice versa. The Einstein-Cartan no-ghost and no-tachyon conditions are cross-checked against the external reference [26] and against the analytic first-order derivation in Appendix G, so the application is not supported solely by self-citation. Self-citations to [24], [31], [65], and [66] are used for background, conventions, and comparison, but the load-bearing derivation in Section II and Appendix F is self-contained. Therefore no step reduces to its own input or to an unverified self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: the couplings c1 through c10 are symbolic inputs. The axioms are standard linear algebra (Schur complement, Moore-Penrose), the SPO construction, and domain assumptions about weak-field Minkowski expansions and the absence of accidental symmetries. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse of the massless block oJγ exists and the Schur complement in Eq. (19) captures all massive kinetic terms.
    Used in Eqs. (18)-(20) to decouple massive and massless sectors and to define K_J.
  • standard math Spin-projection operators for parity-violating theories satisfy completeness and orthonormality (Eqs. A3, A10), with parity-violating SPOs imaginary.
    Needed to express the wave operator as coefficient matrices and to derive the no-ghost criterion in Eq. (16).
  • domain assumption Minkowski spacetime is an admissible background with no accidental gauge symmetries for the Einstein-Cartan models considered.
    Section IIIB (p.18) assumes this to extract flat particle content; relies on [65,66].
  • domain assumption The action in Eq. (29) is the most general parity-indefinite Einstein-Cartan action that propagates the graviton plus two scalars only.
    Backs the 'most general' claim; not proven in this paper, relies on the literature (e.g. [70-73]).
  • domain assumption Null vectors of the wave operator are independent of the Lagrangian couplings for the models considered.
    Appendix E uses this to write O+_J via Eq. (E6); the paper notes exceptions for parametric gauge symmetries.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The particle spectra of parity-violating theories: A less radical approach and an upgrade of PSALTer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2YBGBIJX

@misc{pith2026250602111,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The particle spectra of parity-violating theories: A less radical approach and an upgrade of PSALTer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2YBGBIJX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02111}
}
read the original abstract

Due to computational barriers, the effects of parity violation have so far been grossly neglected in gravitational model-building, leading to a serious gap in the space of prior models. We present a new algorithm for efficiently computing the particle spectrum for any parity-violating tensorial field theory. It allows to extract conditions for the absence of massive ghosts without resorting to any manipulation of radicals in cases where the particle masses are irrational functions of the Lagrangian coupling coefficients. We test it against several examples, among which is the most general parity-indefinite Einstein-Cartan/Poincar\'e gravity that propagates two healthy massive scalars (in addition to the massless graviton). Importantly, we upgrade the PSALTer software in the Wolfram Language to accommodate parity-violating theories. PSALTer is a contribution to the xAct project.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02111 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The spectrograph of the parity-violating two-form model in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The spectrograph of the parity-violating two-form model in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The spectrograph of the ‘one-by-two’ CSKR model in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The spectrograph of the ‘zero-by-three’ CSKR model in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The spectrograph of the theory defined by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Partial particle spectrum of the most general parity-violating PGT. Due to the square masses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Numerical polology: towards next-generation model-building for cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Numerical polology framework samples coupling space to discover ghost-free tensor field theories up to rank three for cosmology, then applies resulting priors to black hole superradiance, dynamical dark energy, and GW data.

  2. On the Gravitational Origin of the QCD Axion

    hep-th 2025-06 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Derivative-coupled gravitational axions cannot solve the strong CP problem; Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity is identified as the only promising framework for a gravitational QCD axion.

  3. Infrared foundations for quantum geometry I: Catalogue of totally symmetric rank-three field theories

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors systematically catalogue gauge-symmetric quadratic actions for a totally symmetric rank-three field, finding five unitary models that propagate massless spin-1, spin-3, or both.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [24]

    G. K. Karananas, The particle spectrum of parity-violating Poincaré gravitational theory, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 055012 (2015), arXiv:1411.5613 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  2. [26]

    Blagojević and B

    M. Blagojević and B. Cvetković, General Poincaré gauge theory: Hamiltonian structure and 55 particle spectrum, Phys. Rev. D98, 024014 (2018), arXiv:1804.05556 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [1]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, One loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A20, 69 (1974)

    1974

  4. [2]

    ’t Hooft, An algorithm for the poles at dimension four in the dimensional regularization procedure, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, An algorithm for the poles at dimension four in the dimensional regularization procedure, Nucl. Phys. B62, 444 (1973)

    1973

  5. [3]

    Deser and P

    S. Deser and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Nonrenormalizability of the Quantized Dirac-Einstein System, Phys. Rev. D10, 411 (1974)

    1974

  6. [4]

    Deser, H.-S

    S. Deser, H.-S. Tsao, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Nonrenormalizability of Einstein Yang-Mills Interactions at the One Loop Level, Phys. Lett. B50, 491 (1974)

    1974

  7. [5]

    M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 266, 709 (1986)

    1986

  8. [6]

    Salvio, Inflating and reheating the Universe with an independent affine connection, Phys

    A. Salvio, Inflating and reheating the Universe with an independent affine connection, Phys. Rev. D106, 103510 (2022), arXiv:2207.08830 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 94 references
  1. [7]

    Di Marco, E

    A. Di Marco, E. Orazi, and G. Pradisi, Einstein–Cartan pseudoscalaron inflation, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 146 (2024), arXiv:2309.11345 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [8]

    G. K. Karananas, Geometrical origin of inflation in Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity, Phys. Lett. B862, 139343 (2025), arXiv:2501.16416 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Freidel, D

    L. Freidel, D. Minic, and T. Takeuchi, Quantum gravity, torsion, parity violation and all that, Phys. Rev. D72, 104002 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0507253. 54

    2005 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Alexandrov, Immirzi parameter and fermions with non-minimal coupling, Class

    S. Alexandrov, Immirzi parameter and fermions with non-minimal coupling, Class. Quant. Grav.25, 145012 (2008), arXiv:0802.1221 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [11]

    J. a. Magueijo, T. G. Zlosnik, and T. W. B. Kibble, Cosmology with a spin, Phys. Rev. D87, 063504 (2013), arXiv:1212.0585 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Shaposhnikov, A

    M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, I. Timiryasov, and S. Zell, Higgs inflation in Einstein-Cartan gravity, JCAP02, 008, [Erratum: JCAP 10, E01 (2021)], arXiv:2007.14978 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Shaposhnikov, A

    M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, I. Timiryasov, and S. Zell, Einstein-Cartan gravity, matter, and scale-invariant generalization , JHEP10, 177, arXiv:2007.16158 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Shaposhnikov, A

    M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, I. Timiryasov, and S. Zell, Einstein-Cartan Portal to Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 161301 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 169901 (2021)], arXiv:2008.11686 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [15]

    G. K. Karananas, M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, and S. Zell, Matter matters in Einstein-Cartan gravity, Phys. Rev. D104, 064036 (2021), arXiv:2106.13811 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [16]

    G. K. Karananas, M. Shaposhnikov, and S. Zell, Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity: uni- fying the strong CP and hierarchy puzzles, JHEP11, 146, arXiv:2406.11956 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  11. [17]

    Chatzistavrakidis, G

    A. Chatzistavrakidis, G. Karagiannis, and P. Schupp, Torsion-induced gravitationalθterm and gravitoelectromagnetism, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1034 (2020), arXiv:2007.06632 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Chatzistavrakidis, G

    A. Chatzistavrakidis, G. Karagiannis, G. Manolakos, and P. Schupp, Axion gravitody- namics, Lense-Thirring effect, and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D105, 104029 (2022), arXiv:2111.04388 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Kuhfuss and J

    R. Kuhfuss and J. Nitsch, Propagating Modes in Gauge Field Theories of Gravity, Gen. Rel. Grav.18, 1207 (1986)

    1986

  14. [20]

    Diakonov, A

    D. Diakonov, A. G. Tumanov, and A. A. Vladimirov, Low-energy General Relativity with torsion: A Systematic derivative expansion, Phys. Rev. D84, 124042 (2011), arXiv:1104.2432 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Baekler, F

    P. Baekler, F. W. Hehl, and J. M. Nester, Poincare gauge theory of gravity: Friedman cos- mology with even and odd parity modes. Analytic part, Phys. Rev. D83, 024001 (2011), arXiv:1009.5112 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Baekler and F

    P. Baekler and F. W. Hehl, Beyond Einstein-Cartan gravity: Quadratic torsion and curvature invariants with even and odd parity including all boundary terms, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 215017 (2011), arXiv:1105.3504 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Y. N. Obukhov and F. W. Hehl, Extended Einstein-Cartan theory a la Diakonov: the field equations, Phys. Lett. B713, 321 (2012), arXiv:1202.6045 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Y. N. Obukhov, Gravitational waves in Poincaré gauge gravity theory, Phys. Rev. D95, 084028 (2017), arXiv:1702.05185 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Barnes, Lagrangian theory for the second-rank tensor field, Journal of Mathematical Physics 6, 788 (1965)

    K. Barnes, Lagrangian theory for the second-rank tensor field, Journal of Mathematical Physics 6, 788 (1965)

    1965

  20. [28]

    R. J. Rivers, Lagrangian theory for neutral massive spin-2 fields, Nuovo Cim.34, 386 (1964)

    1964

  21. [29]

    Van Nieuwenhuizen, On ghost-free tensor lagrangians and linearized gravitation, Nucl

    P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, On ghost-free tensor lagrangians and linearized gravitation, Nucl. Phys. B60, 478 (1973)

    1973

  22. [30]

    Percacci and E

    R. Percacci and E. Sezgin, New class of ghost- and tachyon-free metric affine gravities, Phys. Rev. D101, 084040 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 109902 (2025)], arXiv:1912.01023 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Barker, C

    W. Barker, C. Marzo, and C. Rigouzzo, PSALTer: Particle Spectrum for Any Tensor La- grangian, (2024), arXiv:2406.09500 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. M. Martin-Garcia, R. Portugal, and L. R. U. Manssur, The Invar tensor package, Comput. Phys. Commun.177, 640 (2007), arXiv:0704.1756 [cs.SC]

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    J. M. Martín-García, xPerm: fast index canonicalization for tensor computer algebra, Comput. Phys. Commun.179, 597 (2008), arXiv:0803.0862 [cs.SC]

    2008 arXiv

  26. [34]

    J. M. Martin-Garcia, D. Yllanes, and R. Portugal, The Invar tensor package: Differential invariants of Riemann, Comput. Phys. Commun.179, 586 (2008), arXiv:0802.1274 [cs.SC]

    2008 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Nutma, xTras : A field-theory inspired xAct package for mathematica, Comput

    T. Nutma, xTras : A field-theory inspired xAct package for mathematica, Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 1719 (2014), arXiv:1308.3493 [cs.SC]

    2014 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. M. Martín-García,xCore, Version 0.6.10

  29. [37]

    Yllanes and J

    D. Yllanes and J. M. Martín-García,xCoba, Version 0.8.5

  30. [38]

    Bäckdahl,SymManipulator, Version 0.9.5, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2021

    T. Bäckdahl,SymManipulator, Version 0.9.5, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Barker, Particle spectra of gravity based on internal symmetry of quantum fields, (2023), arXiv:2311.11790 [hep-th]

    W. Barker, Particle spectra of gravity based on internal symmetry of quantum fields, (2023), arXiv:2311.11790 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Barker and C

    W. Barker and C. Marzo, Particle spectra of general Ricci-type Palatini or metric-affine theo- ries, Phys. Rev. D109, 104017 (2024), arXiv:2402.07641 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Barker and S

    W. Barker and S. Zell, Consistent particle physics in metric-affine gravity from extended pro- jective symmetry, (2024), arXiv:2402.14917 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Barker, M

    W. Barker, M. Hobson, A. Lasenby, Y.-C. Lin, and Z. Wei, Every Poincaré gauge theory is conformal: a compelling case for dynamical vector torsion, (2024), arXiv:2406.12826 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    T. Dyer, W. Barker, and D. Iosifidis, Complete background cosmology of parity-even quadratic metric-affine gravity, (2024), arXiv:2412.15329 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    E. H. Moore, On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrix, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society26, 394–395 (1920)

    1920

  37. [45]

    Penrose, A generalized inverse for matrices, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society51, 406–413 (1955)

    R. Penrose, A generalized inverse for matrices, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society51, 406–413 (1955)

    1955

  38. [46]

    Sezgin and P

    E. Sezgin and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, New Ghost Free Gravity Lagrangians with Propagating Torsion, Phys. Rev. D21, 3269 (1980). 56

    1980

  39. [47]

    Barker, G

    W. Barker, G. K. Karananas, and A. Tu,Supplemental materials at www.github.com/wevbarker/SupplementalMaterials-2506

  40. [48]

    A.AuriliaandY.Takahashi,GeneralizedMaxwellEquationsandtheGaugeMixingMechanism of Mass Generation, Prog. Theor. Phys.66, 693 (1981)

    1981

  41. [49]

    Utiyama, Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction, Phys

    R. Utiyama, Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction, Phys. Rev.101, 1597 (1956)

    1956

  42. [50]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Lorentz invariance and the gravitational field, J. Math. Phys.2, 212 (1961)

    1961

  43. [51]

    D. W. Sciama, On the analogy between charge and spin in general relativity, inRecent devel- opments in general relativity(Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1962) p. 415

    1962

  44. [52]

    Cartan, Sur une généralisation de la notion de courbure de Riemann et les espaces à torsion, Comptes Rendus, Ac

    É. Cartan, Sur une généralisation de la notion de courbure de Riemann et les espaces à torsion, Comptes Rendus, Ac. Sc. Paris174, 593 (1922)

    1922

  45. [53]

    Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie), inAnnales scientifiques de l’École normale supérieure, Vol

    É. Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie), inAnnales scientifiques de l’École normale supérieure, Vol. 40 (1923) pp. 325–412

    1923

  46. [54]

    Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie)(suite), inAnnales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Vol

    É. Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie)(suite), inAnnales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Vol. 41 (1924) pp. 1–25

    1924

  47. [55]

    Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (deuxième partie), inAnnales scientifiques de l’École normale supérieure, Vol

    É. Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (deuxième partie), inAnnales scientifiques de l’École normale supérieure, Vol. 42 (1925) pp. 17–88

    1925

  48. [56]

    Einstein, Einheitliche Feldtheorie von Gravitation und Elektrizität, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Einheitliche Feldtheorie von Gravitation und Elektrizität, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss22, 414 (1925)

    1925

  49. [57]

    Einstein, Riemanngeometrie mit Aufrechterhaltung des Begriffes des Fern-Parallelismus, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Riemanngeometrie mit Aufrechterhaltung des Begriffes des Fern-Parallelismus, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss17, 217 (1928)

    1928

  50. [58]

    Einstein, Neue Möglichkeitfür eine einheitliche Feldtheorievon Gravitation und Elektrizität, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Neue Möglichkeitfür eine einheitliche Feldtheorievon Gravitation und Elektrizität, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss18, 224 (1928)

    1928

  51. [59]

    W. E. V. Barker, A. N. Lasenby, M. P. Hobson, and W. J. Handley, Mapping Poincaré gauge cosmology to Horndeski theory for emergent dark energy, Phys. Rev. D102, 084002 (2020), arXiv:2006.03581 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  52. [60]

    W. E. V. Barker, A. N. Lasenby, M. P. Hobson, and W. J. Handley, Systematic study of background cosmology in unitary Poincaré gauge theories with application to emergent dark radiation andH 0 tension, Phys. Rev. D102, 024048 (2020), arXiv:2003.02690 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    W. E. V. Barker, A. N. Lasenby, M. P. Hobson, and W. J. Handley, Nonlinear Hamiltonian analysis of new quadratic torsion theories: Cases with curvature-free constraints, Phys. Rev. D104, 084036 (2021), arXiv:2101.02645 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Rigouzzo and S

    C. Rigouzzo and S. Zell, Coupling metric-affine gravity to a Higgs-like scalar field, Phys. Rev. D106, 024015 (2022), arXiv:2204.03003 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    W. E. Vandepeer Barker,Gauge theories of gravity, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge U. (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    W. E. V. Barker, Geometric multipliers and partial teleparallelism in Poincaré gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D108, 024053 (2023), arXiv:2205.13534 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    G. K. Karananas, Particle content of (scalarcurvature)2 gravities revisited, Phys. Rev. D111, 044068 (2025), arXiv:2407.09598 [hep-th]. 57

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    G. K. Karananas, The particle content of (scalar curvature)2 metric-affine gravity, (2024), arXiv:2408.16818 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Blixt, R

    D. Blixt, R. Ferraro, A. Golovnev, and M.-J. Guzmán, Lorentz gauge-invariant variables in torsion-based theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D105, 084029 (2022), arXiv:2201.11102 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Blixt, M

    D. Blixt, M. Hohmann, T. Koivisto, and L. Marzola, Teleparallel bigravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1120 (2023), arXiv:2305.03504 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Hayashi and T

    K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, Gravity From Poincare Gauge Theory of the Fundamental Parti- cles. 4. Mass and Energy of Particle Spectrum, Prog. Theor. Phys.64, 2222 (1980)

    1980

  62. [70]

    R. D. Hecht, J. M. Nester, and V. V. Zhytnikov, Some Poincare gauge theory Lagrangians with well posed initial value problems, Phys. Lett. A222, 37 (1996)

    1996

  63. [71]

    H. Chen, J. M. Nester, and H.-J. Yo, Acausal PGT modes and the nonlinear constraint effect, Acta Phys. Polon. B29, 961 (1998)

    1998

  64. [72]

    Yo and J

    H.-j. Yo and J. M. Nester, Hamiltonian analysis of Poincare gauge theory scalar modes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D8, 459 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9902032

    1999 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Yo and J

    H.-J. Yo and J. M. Nester, Hamiltonian analysis of Poincare gauge theory: Higher spin modes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D11, 747 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0112030

    2002 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Yo and J

    H.-J. Yo and J. M. Nester, Dynamic Scalar Torsion and an Oscillating Universe, Mod. Phys. Lett. A22, 2057 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612738

    2007 arXiv

  67. [75]

    K.-F. Shie, J. M. Nester, and H.-J. Yo, Torsion Cosmology and the Accelerating Universe, Phys. Rev. D78, 023522 (2008), arXiv:0805.3834 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Chen, F.-H

    H. Chen, F.-H. Ho, J. M. Nester, C.-H. Wang, and H.-J. Yo, Cosmological dynamics with propagating Lorentz connection modes of spin zero, JCAP10, 027, arXiv:0908.3323 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Ho and J

    F.-H. Ho and J. M. Nester, Poincaré gauge theory with even and odd parity dynamic connec- tion modes: isotropic Bianchi cosmological models, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.330, 012005 (2011), arXiv:1105.5001 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Ho and J

    F.-H. Ho and J. M. Nester, Poincaré Gauge Theory With Coupled Even And Odd Parity Dynamic Spin-0 Modes: Dynamic Equations For Isotropic Bianchi Cosmologies, Annalen Phys. 524, 97 (2012), arXiv:1106.0711 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  71. [79]

    F.-H. Ho, H. Chen, J. M. Nester, and H.-J. Yo, General Poincaré Gauge Theory Cosmology, Chin. J. Phys.53, 110109 (2015), arXiv:1512.01202 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Tseng,Gravitational Theories with Torsion, Ph.D

    H.-H. Tseng,Gravitational Theories with Torsion, Ph.D. thesis, Taiwan, Natl. Tsing Hua U. (2018), arXiv:1812.00314 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Zhang and L

    H. Zhang and L. Xu, Late-time acceleration and inflation in a Poincaré gauge cosmological model, JCAP09, 050, arXiv:1904.03545 [gr-qc]

    1904 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Zhang and L

    H. Zhang and L. Xu, Inflation in the parity-conserving Poincaré gauge cosmology, JCAP10, 003, arXiv:1906.04340 [gr-qc]

    1906 arXiv

  75. [83]

    F. J. Maldonado Torralba,New effective theories of gravitation and their phenomenological consequences, Ph.D. thesis, Cape Town U., Dept. Math. (2020), arXiv:2101.11523 [gr-qc]. 58

    2020 arXiv

  76. [84]

    de la Cruz Dombriz, F

    A. de la Cruz Dombriz, F. J. Maldonado Torralba, and D. F. Mota, Dark matter candidate from torsion, Phys. Lett. B834, 137488 (2022), arXiv:2112.03957 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Puetzfeld, Status of non-Riemannian cosmology, New Astron

    D. Puetzfeld, Status of non-Riemannian cosmology, New Astron. Rev.49, 59 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0404119

    2005

  78. [86]

    Ni, Searches for the role of spin and polarization in gravity, Rept

    W.-T. Ni, Searches for the role of spin and polarization in gravity, Rept. Prog. Phys.73, 056901 (2010), arXiv:0912.5057 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Puetzfeld and Y

    D. Puetzfeld and Y. N. Obukhov, Prospects of detecting spacetime torsion, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23, 1442004 (2014), arXiv:1405.4137 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Ni, Searches for the role of spin and polarization in gravity: a five-year update, Int

    W.-T. Ni, Searches for the role of spin and polarization in gravity: a five-year update, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser.40, 1660010 (2016), arXiv:1501.07696 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Beltrán Jiménez and F

    J. Beltrán Jiménez and F. J. Maldonado Torralba, Revisiting the stability of quadratic Poincaré gauge gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 611 (2020), arXiv:1910.07506 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [90]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B91, 99 (1980)

    1980

  83. [91]

    I. D. Gialamas and K. Tamvakis, Inflation in Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity, Phys. Rev. D111, 044007 (2025), arXiv:2410.16364 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Y.-C. Lin, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Ghost and tachyon free Poincaré gauge theories: A systematic approach, Phys. Rev. D99, 064001 (2019), arXiv:1812.02675 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Y.-C. Lin, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Power-counting renormalizable, ghost-and- tachyon-free Poincaré gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D101, 064038 (2020), arXiv:1910.14197 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    G. K. Karananas,Poincaré, Scale and Conformal Symmetries Gauge Perspective and Cosmo- logical Ramifications, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique, Lausanne (2016), arXiv:1608.08451 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.