Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 37 references

The paper argues that whenever a Schwarzschild black hole reaches a critical temperature tied to a tower of light states, the Gregory–Laflamme instability ends by converting a calculable amount of mass—about M_pl^{d−2}/Λ_s^{d−3}—into partic

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A mechanism is proposed in which black hole instability at the tower scale converts a fraction of the mass into particles at the species scale, with Hawking evaporation subdominant.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A clearly written conjecture that GL instabilities produce species-scale particles; the central scale replacement is asserted, not derived, but the paper deserves a serious referee. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2608.00590 v1 pith:3A7NDGUL submitted 2026-08-01 hep-th hep-ph

IR Black Hole Instabilities Trigger Species-Scale Particle Production

Luis A. Anchordoqui , Alek Bedroya , Dieter L\"ust , Houri-Christina Tarazi This is my paper
classification hep-th hep-ph
keywords black hole instabilitiesGregory-Laflamme instabilityspecies scalequantum gravityUV-IR connectioncharged black holesextra dimensionsstring theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a direct link between the infrared and the ultraviolet in quantum gravity. It claims that when a black hole reaches the temperature Λ_BH at which a tower of light states appears, the Gregory–Laflamme instability of the corresponding black string—the tendency of the horizon to pinch off along an extra dimension—does not end in a naked singularity, as classical general relativity suggests, but in a self-gravitating bound state of quanta at the species scale Λ_s. The result is a concrete energy budget: an amount ΔE ∼ M_pl^{d−2}/Λ_s^{d−3} of the initial black-hole mass is emitted as particles of energy Λ_s, independent of the number of extra dimensions. The paper also shows that Hawking evaporation of the black holes formed during the cascade is parametrically subdominant, and that charged black holes behave differently depending on whether their charge is localized or winds around the extra dimension. If correct, the mechanism gives a testable route from low-energy black-hole thermodynamics to the deepest ultraviolet sector of the theory.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the Gregory–Laflamme instability is a UV/IR bridge: when a black string thins to a horizon radius of order the inverse species scale, Λ_s^{-1}, gravitational effective field theory breaks down and the system must be described as a bound state of Λ_s-energy quanta. This replacement of the string scale by the species scale is asserted for general theories of quantum gravity, and it yields the prediction that a fraction of order ΔE ∼ M_pl^{d−2}/Λ_s^{d−3} of the initial black-hole mass is converted into particles of energy Λ_s, with no dependence on the number of internal dimensions. For charged black holes, the paper derives two thresholds: Q_

What carries the argument

The mechanism runs on three scales. The Planck scale M_pl,d sets the strength of gravitational interactions; the species scale Λ_s is the threshold at which higher-derivative gravitational corrections become order one and the effective field theory fails; and the black hole scale Λ_BH is the temperature at which a Schwarzschild black hole becomes unstable against the tower of light states. The load-bearing object is the Gregory–Laflamme instability of a black string on a large extra dimension: its self-similar cascade produces ever-thinner segments whose curvature eventually reaches Λ_s^2. At that point the paper replaces the would-be singularity with a self-gravitating bound state of Λ_s qu

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that in a general quantum gravity the endpoint scale of the Gregory–Laflamme cascade is the species scale—when the thinning string reaches r_h ∼ Λ_s^{-1} it becomes a self-gravitating bound state of Λ_s quanta—rather than the string scale or some other dynamical scale; the paper asserts this replacement without derivation, and the energy estimate ΔE follows from it.

What would settle it

Find a single consistent quantum-gravity construction in which the Gregory–Laflamme endpoint is resolved at a scale parametrically different from Λ_s, for example at the string scale in a weakly coupled limit, and show that the released energy scales with that other scale rather than with M_pl^{d−2}/Λ_s^{d−3}. Equivalently, a numerical simulation of the cascade that makes the thinnest string segments reach r_h ≪ Λ_s^{-1} before any nonperturbative object forms would falsify the claimed energy budget; conversely, detecting a burst peaked at energy Λ_s from a black-hole population crossing Λ_BH

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any Schwarzschild black hole that passes through its black-hole scale should emit a burst of particles at the species scale, with total energy ΔE ∼ M_pl^{d−2}/Λ_s^{d−3}.
  • The released energy is independent of the dimension of the internal space and of which tower triggers the transition, making it a robust signature once Λ_s is fixed.
  • Hawking radiation from the low-mass black holes formed in the Gregory–Laflamme cascade contributes at most a parametrically smaller amount of Λ_s quanta for self-similar cascades with c ≲ 1/2.
  • For winding-charged black holes, species-scale particle production occurs only when q_1 < q_crit and Q < Q_UV; above those thresholds the endpoint is a stable or nearly extremal object and the burst is suppressed.
  • A sign criterion—whether the gauge coupling and the light-tower mass move in the same or opposite directions across moduli space—decides whether a given charge blocks or accelerates the instability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the species-scale replacement is universal, the same energy estimate should apply to any consistent quantum-gravity theory with a light tower, not only to string compactifications; this could be tested against explicit top-down examples once their species scales are known.
  • Because ΔE depends only on M_pl,d and Λ_s, a cosmological population of black holes passing through Λ_BH would produce a distinctive burst peaked at energy Λ_s, which might be distinguishable from Hawking evaporation by its spectrum and timing.
  • The paper's subdominance bound assumes the numerical cascade parameter c ≃ 1/4; if future simulations find c above 1/2 in some dimension or charge sector, Hawking radiation would dominate the species-scale yield, sharpening the falsifiability of the mechanism.
  • The sign criterion for charge type is conjectured to extend from Kaluza–Klein towers to string towers; if that extension holds, the criterion may provide a general way to read Gregory–Laflamme stability off moduli-space data alone, without solving the perturbative mode.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a UV/IR mechanism in quantum gravity in which the Gregory–Laflamme instability of black strings, triggered when a Schwarzschild black hole reaches a conjectural temperature Λ_BH associated with a light tower of states, converts a parametrically large amount of the black-hole mass into particles at the species scale Λ_s. The central estimate is Eq. (6), ΔE ∼ M_pl,d^{d−2}/Λ_s^{d−3}. The authors argue that, at the endpoint of the GL cascade, the thinning black string becomes a self-gravitating bound state of Λ_s quanta, and they use known numerical GL simulations and entropy arguments to support this picture. They then compare this mechanism with Hawking evaporation of the low-mass tail of the cascade, finding that the proposed production dominates for a self-similar cascade with exponent α > −3/2, which is satisfied for the cited numerical value c ≃ 1/4. The analysis is extended to dyonic and dilatonic black holes, with the conclusion that Λ_s-particle production occurs whenever the black hole is GL unstable and the charge is below the thresholds Q_GL and Q_UV in Eqs. (23)–(24).

Significance. If established, the mechanism would provide a concrete and testable UV/IR connection: an infrared black-hole instability producing the highest-energy quanta of the theory. The paper is commendably clear about its scaling estimates, and it makes explicit use of existing numerical simulations of the GL cascade and of entropy arguments that are on solid ground. The distinction between winding-type and smeared charges, and the proposed sign criterion in Eqs. (27)–(28), are physically appealing and provide a useful organizing principle. However, the central estimate is not a derivation: it rests on the asserted replacement of the string scale by the species scale at the endpoint of the GL instability, and on the conjectural existence of a universal Λ_BH phase transition. The charged-sector results are delegated to an accompanying paper. The paper is therefore best viewed as a proposal with strong plausibility arguments rather than a proof; these caveats should be reflected in the text and in the abstract.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV, Eqs. (5)–(6)] The central estimate ΔE ∼ M_pl,d^{d−2}/Λ_s^{d−3} depends on the sentence 'the string scale is naturally replaced by the species scale' after Eq. (5). This replacement is not derived. In the only controlled example, weakly coupled string theory, the endpoint mass is Eq. (5) with M_s, and the cited reference [12] starts from a configuration already at the Horowitz–Polchinski correspondence point, not from the dynamical GL cascade. For a generic light tower—e.g. Kaluza–Klein states in a large extra dimension—it is not established that the endpoint is a self-gravitating bound state of Λ_s quanta rather than, say, a higher-dimensional black hole or a state set by Λ_BH. Since Eq. (6) is the main quantitative result of the Letter, this missing derivation is load-bearing and must be addressed, either by providing evidence or by explicitly marking the result as conditional/conjectural.
  2. [Abstract and Section IV, Eq. (16)] The abstract states that production of Λ_s quanta through Hawking radiation 'is always subdominant.' The body gives a conditional result: Eq. (16) yields dominance only for α > −3/2. The self-similar cascade model gives α = ln2/(2 ln c^{−1}) − 1, so α > −3/2 is equivalent to c < 1/2 (Eqs. (20)–(21)); the numerical value c ≃ 1/4 is an input from Ref. [27]. Thus the quantitative conclusion is not 'always' but 'for the observed cascade parameter c ≃ 1/4 and for α > −3/2.' The abstract should be corrected to match the body.
  3. [Section I and throughout] The mechanism assumes the existence of a universal black-hole phase transition at the scale Λ_BH, following the conjecture of Ref. [5]. This is not an established result, and the paper's argument does not derive it. The GL instability and Horowitz–Polchinski transition are established in specific corners (large extra dimensions, weakly coupled string theory), but the claim that a temperature Λ_BH associated with the lightest tower always triggers a phase transition in any quantum gravity theory is an input. The central mechanism is therefore conditional on this conjecture. The paper should state this limitation explicitly and separate the rigorous parts (GL instability, entropy comparisons, cascade scaling) from the conjectural extension.
  4. [Section V, Eqs. (22)–(26)] The entire charged generalization, including the threshold q_crit in Eq. (26) and the resulting Q_UV and Q_GL thresholds, is delegated to the accompanying paper [22], which is cited as '2603.xxxx' and is not available for verification. The main conclusion for charged black holes, Eq. (29), depends directly on these new GL-stability computations. Since the Letter is not self-contained on this point, the authors should either include a summary of the derivation or clearly state that the charged-sector results are fully established in [22] and only quoted here. As it stands, the reader cannot independently assess the validity of Eq. (26).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II heading] The heading 'IMPOR TANT ENERGY SCALES' contains a typo: 'IMPORTANT' should not be split.
  2. [Introduction] There is a missing placeholder reference in 'which was conjectured to be true in []'; also 'we usestring stars' is missing a space. Update both.
  3. [References] Ref. [22] is listed as '2603.xxxx'; a complete reference or arXiv number should be provided.
  4. [Section IV, Eq. (15)] The notation δM_UV is introduced after the text has already used ΔE for the same quantity. Please align the notation to avoid confusion.
  5. [Figure 3 caption] The caption says the white line denotes k^2 = 0 and that the curve is independent of q_0, but the axes include q_0 and q_1. Consider adding a sentence explaining why the threshold is independent of q_0 in this plot.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Eq. (6) restates the assumed species-scale endpoint rather than deriving it; the Λ_BH premise is imported from the authors' own conjecture.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section IV, around Eq. (6)]
    "In a general theory of quantum gravity, the string scale is naturally replaced by the species scale Λ_s. The thinning black string then continues to shrink until r_h ∼ Λ_s^{-1}, at which point the gravitational EFT breaks down. Beyond this point, the correct description should be a self-gravitating bound state of quanta with typical energy of order Λ_s ... This is the central result of this Letter. Whenever a Schwarzschild black hole undergoes an instability at a temperature Λ_BH associated with the lightest tower of states, an amount of order ∆E∼ M_pl,d^{d-2}/Λ_s^{d-3} (6) ..."

    Eq. (6) is not obtained from the GL cascade dynamics; it is the mass of a d-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole with horizon radius set to the assumed endpoint scale r_h ∼ Λ_s^{-1}. The Schwarzschild mass-radius relation gives M ∼ M_pl,d^{d-2}/Λ_s^{d-3}, exactly Eq. (6). Thus the predicted energy is the input ansatz (endpoint = self-gravitating bound state at the species scale) rewritten as an output. The externally established GL instability only says the string thins; it does not fix the endpoint to Λ_s rather than M_s or any other scale. The paper itself labels the string-star existence conjecture as 'not yet proven' in Section I.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section I, paragraph on Λ_BH; see also Section IV]
    "This phenomenon has motivated the conjecture proposed in Ref. [5] that there exists a characteristic black hole scale, Λ_BH, below the Planck scale, at which Schwarzschild black holes undergo a phase transition to a more stable configuration. This transition necessarily involves a tower of light states with masses on the order of Λ_BH."

    The existence of the Λ_BH phase transition is the load-bearing premise for the mechanism, and it is imported from Ref. [5] (Bedroya, Vafa, Wu), whose author Bedroya is a co-author of the present paper. The paper explicitly calls it a conjecture and provides no independent verification. Without this self-cited premise, the conditional 'whenever a Schwarzschild black hole undergoes an instability at a temperature Λ_BH' has no established trigger, so the derivation chain for Eq. (6) rests on an unverified same-group conjecture.

full rationale

The GL instability itself, the Horowitz-Polchinski correspondence in weakly coupled string theory, the entropy comparisons, and the Hawking-evaporation-subdominance estimate are grounded in external numerical/string-theory results (Refs. [6,7,11,12,26-28,31], etc.) and are not circular. However, the central species-scale production claim Eq. (6) is an assumption renamed as a result: the endpoint is asserted to be a self-gravitating bound state of Λ_s quanta, and Eq. (6) is simply the corresponding Schwarzschild mass. The paper even flags the string-star existence claim as unproven ('this claim is not yet proven' with a missing reference bracket) and admits the replacement of the string scale by the species scale is an extension ('naturally replaced') rather than a derivation. In addition, the Λ_BH phase-transition premise is taken from a self-cited conjecture by the same group. These two load-bearing steps make the central claim partially circular: it reduces to its own endpoint ansatz plus a self-cited conjecture. Score 6 reflects that the external ingredients give the paper independent content, but the headline 'prediction' is not independently derived.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a conjecture by the same group (the black hole scale), on an asserted replacement of the string scale with the species scale, and on numerical results from the literature. The charged results are imported wholesale from an unavailable companion paper. The scaling estimate itself is parameter-free apart from the cascade exponent α, whose value is inherited from a numerical simulation.

free parameters (2)
  • c (cascade timescale ratio) = c ≈ 1/4 (from Lehner-Pretorius [27])
    Ratio of successive instability timescales in the self-similar GL cascade. Numerical input from the literature, not derived in this paper. Used to determine α via Eq. (20).
  • α (self-similar cascade mass-spectrum exponent) = α = ln2/(2 ln c) - 1 ≈ -1.25 for c ≈ 1/4
    Power-law exponent of the black hole mass distribution introduced in Eq. (7). The claim that Hawking evaporation is subdominant requires α > -3/2, which holds for the adopted c. This is a modeling choice, not measured by the authors.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The black hole scale conjecture: Schwarzschild black holes undergo a phase transition at scale Λ_BH involving a tower of light states (Ref. [5]).
    The entire mechanism presupposes this conjecture. Ref. [5] is by Bedroya, Vafa and Wu; Bedroya is a co-author of this Letter, so the premise is self-cited and unproven.
  • ad hoc to paper The species scale Λ_s replaces the string scale in the Horowitz-Polchinski correspondence, so the thinning black string becomes a self-gravitating bound state of quanta of energy Λ_s when r_h ~ Λ_s^{-1}.
    Assumed in Section IV ('the string scale is naturally replaced by the species scale') without derivation; this is load-bearing for the central result ΔE.
  • domain assumption The GL cascade proceeds as in the numerical simulations of Refs. [26-28], including the self-similar structure with c ≈ 1/4 and finite-time approach to a naked singularity in classical GR.
    The authors rely on existing numerics; they do not rerun or verify these simulations.
  • domain assumption The smeared (0-form) versus winding (1-form) charge distinction, with the gauge coupling depending on the radion, determines whether the near-horizon geometry shrinks or grows the extra dimension.
    Standard Kaluza-Klein and string compactification reasoning, used in Section V to explain the charge dependence of the GL instability.
  • ad hoc to paper Eq. (26) for q_crit and the GL-stability results for dyonic and dilatonic black holes are correct as stated.
    These results are presented as facts but their derivations are entirely deferred to the companion paper [22], cited only as arXiv:2603.xxxx.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of IR Black Hole Instabilities Trigger Species-Scale Particle Production." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3A7NDGUL

@misc{pith2026260800590,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: IR Black Hole Instabilities Trigger Species-Scale Particle Production},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3A7NDGUL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00590}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We propose a novel UV-IR mechanism in quantum gravity in which black hole instabilities act as a bridge to the most ultraviolet sector of the theory. Specifically, we argue that when black holes reach a critical temperature associated with a light tower of states, they undergo a phase transition that sources particles near the species scale, a threshold beyond which any effective field theory of gravity fails. Using the existing numerical results, we show that production of such particles through Hawking radiation is always subdominant. We also extend our investigation to a large family of dyonic and dilatonic black holes and show how the conclusion depends on the origin of the gauge symmetry, its dilatonic coupling, and the charge under that gauge symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00590 by Alek Bedroya, Dieter L\"ust, Houri-Christina Tarazi, Luis A. Anchordoqui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Scaling of the black hole entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic evolution of the Gregory–Laflamme (GL) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. GL-mode eigenvalue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Black hole explosions,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black hole explosions,”Nature248 (1974) 30–31

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,”Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104,arXiv:hep-th/9601029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  3. [3]

    Black hole entropy in M theory,

    J. M. Maldacena, A. Strominger, and E. Witten, “Black hole entropy in M theory,”JHEP12(1997) 002, arXiv:hep-th/9711053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  4. [4]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,”Nucl. Phys. B766 (2007) 21–33,arXiv:hep-th/0605264

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    The Tale of Three Scales: the Planck, the Species, and the Black Hole Scales,

    A. Bedroya, C. Vafa, and D. H. Wu, “The Tale of Three Scales: the Planck, the Species, and the Black Hole Scales,”arXiv:2403.18005 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Black strings and p-branes are unstable,

    R. Gregory and R. Laflamme, “Black strings and p-branes are unstable,”Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 2837–2840,arXiv:hep-th/9301052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  7. [7]

    Selfgravitating fundamental strings,

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, “Selfgravitating fundamental strings,”Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 2557–2563,arXiv:hep-th/9707170

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    On the black hole/string transition,

    Y. Chen, J. Maldacena, and E. Witten, “On the black hole/string transition,”JHEP01(2023) 103, arXiv:2109.08563 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    On small black holes in string theory,

    B. Balthazar, J. Chu, and D. Kutasov, “On small black holes in string theory,”JHEP03(2024) 116, arXiv:2210.12033 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Winding Tachyons and Stringy Black Holes,

    B. Balthazar, J. Chu, and D. Kutasov, “Winding Tachyons and Stringy Black Holes,”arXiv:2204.00012 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    String stars ind≥7,

    A. Bedroya and D. Wu, “String stars ind≥7,” arXiv:2412.19888 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    String theory in a pinch: resolving the Gregory-Laflamme singularity,

    R. Emparan, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c, “String theory in a pinch: resolving the Gregory-Laflamme singularity,”JHEP02(2025) 104, arXiv:2411.14998 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Phases of string stars in the presence of a spatial circle,

    J. Chu, “Phases of string stars in the presence of a spatial circle,”JHEP07(2025) 080,arXiv:2501.03312 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,

    G. Dvali, “Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,”Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 528–536,arXiv:0706.2050 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC,

    G. Dvali and M. Redi, “Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 045027,arXiv:0710.4344 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species,

    G. Dvali and D. L¨ ust, “Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species,”Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 505–527, arXiv:0912.3167 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    Moduli-dependent species scale,

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner, and D. H. Wu, “Moduli-dependent species scale,”Beijing J. Pure Appl. Math.1no. 1, (2024) 1–41,arXiv:2212.06841 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Black hole entropy and moduli-dependent species scale,

    N. Cribiori, D. L¨ ust, and G. Staudt, “Black hole entropy and moduli-dependent species scale,”Phys. Lett. B844 (2023) 138113,arXiv:2212.10286 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario,

    A. Bedroya, G. Obied, C. Vafa, and D. H. Wu, “Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario,”arXiv:2507.03090 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Gregory-Laflamme instability of 5D electrically charged black strings

    V. P. Frolov and A. A. Shoom, “Gregory-Laflamme instability of 5D electrically charged black strings,” Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 104002,arXiv:0903.2893 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Analytic evidence for the Gubser-Mitra conjecture

    U. Miyamoto, “Analytic evidence for the Gubser-Mitra conjecture,”Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 380–384, arXiv:0709.1028 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Gregory–Laflamme for dyonic and dilatonic black holes,

    L. A. Anchordoqui, A. Bedroya, D. L¨ ust, and H.-C. Tarazi, “Gregory–Laflamme for dyonic and dilatonic black holes,”2603.xxxx

    work page

  23. [23]

    Density of states, black holes and the Emergent String Conjecture,

    A. Bedroya, R. K. Mishra, and M. Wiesner, “Density of states, black holes and the Emergent String Conjecture,”JHEP01(2025) 144,arXiv:2405.00083 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    The double EFT expansion in quantum gravity,

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, and A. Herr´ aez, “The double EFT expansion in quantum gravity,” SciPost Phys.19no. 4, (2025) 096,arXiv:2501.14880 8 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Black hole entropy, quantum corrections and EFT transitions,

    A. Castellano and M. Zatti, “Black hole entropy, quantum corrections and EFT transitions,”JHEP08 (2025) 112,arXiv:2502.02655 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Connecting black holes and black strings

    H. Kudoh and T. Wiseman, “Connecting black holes and black strings,”Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 161102, arXiv:hep-th/0409111

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    Black Strings, Low Viscosity Fluids, and Violation of Cosmic Censorship,

    L. Lehner and F. Pretorius, “Black Strings, Low Viscosity Fluids, and Violation of Cosmic Censorship,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 101102,arXiv:1006.5960 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    Endpoint of the Gregory-Laflamme instability of black strings revisited,

    P. Figueras, T. Fran¸ ca, C. Gu, and T. Andrade, “Endpoint of the Gregory-Laflamme instability of black strings revisited,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 4, (2023) 044028,arXiv:2210.13501 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    The dark dimension and the Swampland,

    M. Montero, C. Vafa, and I. Valenzuela, “The dark dimension and the Swampland,”JHEP02(2023) 022, arXiv:2205.12293 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    More on black holes perceiving the dark dimension,

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, and D. L¨ ust, “More on black holes perceiving the dark dimension,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 1, (2024) 015004,arXiv:2403.19604 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    A critical dimension in the black-string phase transition

    E. Sorkin, “A Critical dimension in the black string phase transition,”Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 031601, arXiv:hep-th/0402216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  32. [32]

    Smeared branes and the Gubser-Mitra conjecture

    P. Bostock and S. F. Ross, “Smeared branes and the Gubser-Mitra conjecture,”Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 064014,arXiv:hep-th/0405026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  33. [33]

    N=2 extremal black holes,

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh, and A. Strominger, “N=2 extremal black holes,”Phys. Rev. D52(1995) R5412–R5416,arXiv:hep-th/9508072

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  34. [34]

    Supersymmetry and attractors,

    S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh, “Supersymmetry and attractors,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 1514–1524, arXiv:hep-th/9602136

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  35. [35]

    Universality of supersymmetric attractors,

    S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh, “Universality of supersymmetric attractors,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 1525–1534,arXiv:hep-th/9603090

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  36. [36]

    Instability of charged black holes in Anti-de Sitter space,

    S. S. Gubser and I. Mitra, “Instability of charged black holes in Anti-de Sitter space,”Clay Math. Proc.1 (2002) 221,arXiv:hep-th/0009126

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  37. [37]

    The Evolution of unstable black holes in anti-de Sitter space,

    S. S. Gubser and I. Mitra, “The Evolution of unstable black holes in anti-de Sitter space,”JHEP08(2001) 018,arXiv:hep-th/0011127

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.