REVIEW 2 cited by
Fractional topological charge in lattice Abelian gauge theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We construct a non-trivial $U(1)/\mathbb{Z}_q$ principal bundle on~$T^4$ from the compact $U(1)$ lattice gauge field by generalizing L\"uscher's constriction so that the cocycle condition contains $\mathbb{Z}_q$ elements (the 't~Hooft flux). The construction requires an admissibility condition on lattice gauge field configurations. From the transition function so constructed, we have the fractional topological charge that is $\mathbb{Z}_q$ one-form gauge invariant and odd under the lattice time reversal transformation. Assuming a rescaling of the vacuum angle $\theta\to q\theta$ suggested from the Witten effect, our construction provides a lattice implementation of the mixed 't~Hooft anomaly between the $\mathbb{Z}_q$ one-form symmetry and the time reversal symmetry in the $U(1)$ gauge theory with matter fields of charge~$q\in2\mathbb{Z}$ when $\theta=\pi$, which was studied by Honda and Tanizaki [J. High Energy Phys. \textbf{12}, 154 (2020)] in the continuum framework.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Monte Carlo Simulation of the $SU(2)/\mathbb{Z}_2$ Yang--Mills Theory
Making the Z2 two-form gauge field dynamical in an SU(2)/Z2 lattice simulation shortens the autocorrelation time of the topological charge and of a gradient-flow energy observable compared with conventional SU(2) HMC.
-
Numerical simulation of fractional topological charge in $SU(N)$ gauge theory coupled with $\mathbb{Z}_N$ 2-form gauge fields
Numerical lattice simulation confirms that Z_2 2-form gauge-field coupling produces fractional (half-integer) topological charge in SU(2) gauge theory and reduces topological autocorrelation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.