Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 92 references

Asymmetric Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder Collapse

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper contends that asymmetric loop-quantum-cosmology dynamics applied to a collapsing homogeneous dust ball yields a geodesically complete spacetime in which the ball bounces at a minimal radius and reexpands, with a weak physical…

desk verdict A serious, honest LQC collapse paper with a genuine new shock and two vacuum metrics, but the shock's physicality is unverified and the central regularity claim remains conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05818 v1 pith:3N6BPLGM submitted 2026-08-06 gr-qc hep-th

Micha{l} Bobula , Tomasz Paw{l}owski This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords loopquantumcosmologyOppenheimer-SnydercollapseregularblackholeasymmetricbounceLemaitre-Tolman-Bondidustshockgeodesiccompleteness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a collapsing homogeneous dust ball, evolved with the time-asymmetric bounce dynamics of loop quantum cosmology, does not crush to a singularity but bounces at a Planckian minimal radius $R_{\min}$ and reexpands into a new asymptotic phase. If true, this would be the first fully dynamical description of regular black hole formation within a loop-quantum-cosmology framework: the spacetime is geodesically complete, with a rich causal structure instead of the Reissner-Nordström-like timelike singularity that appears in symmetric-bounce models. The new physical feature is a weak $C^0$ shock at the dust-ball surface, where the induced metric stays continuous but the extrinsic curvature jumps, caused by the expanding interior meeting still-contracting exterior vacuum shells. The paper also derives two quantum-corrected vacuum line elements, one Schwarzschild-like and one de Sitter-like, that join at the minimal radius.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on the asymmetric effective LTB dynamics, whose parametric solution $R(T,x)$ lets each dust shell undergo power-law contraction, bounce at $R_{\min}$, and then expand exponentially. To connect the interior dust ball to the exterior vacuum, the paper derives junction conditions from tangent-vector consistency, orthogonality, and continuity of the areal radius, then solves them at the dust-ball surface; the weak shock is diagnosed through the continuity condition for the extrinsic curvature. The causal structure is built by rewriting the vacuum in Painlevé-Gullstrand-like coordinates, constructing double-null coordinates, and compactifying them into a conformal diagram, with the areal radius $R$ serving as an affine parameter on radial null geodesics and with geodesic extension past $R_{\min}$ achieved by a monotonicity assumption on the comoving coordinate $x$.

What would settle it

Take the null-geodesic equations in the paper's vacuum line element and integrate through $R_{\min}$ in both coordinate signs without imposing monotonicity of $x$; any trajectory that ends at $R = 0$, or cannot be covered by the double-null chart, would falsify the geodesic-completeness claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the asymmetric loop quantum cosmological bounce, when implemented for Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi dust collapse, replaces the classical singularity of the Oppenheimer-Snyder model with a complete bounce-and-reexpansion history. The dust ball contracts as a power law, crosses two trapping horizons, reaches a minimum areal radius $R_{\min}$, and then enters a de Sitter-like expansion; in the process a genuine $C^0$ shock forms at the surface of the ball, and the vacuum exterior is described by two distinct quantum-corrected metrics rather than one. The authors state that the resulting spacetime is geodesically complete, with null geodesics extended through $R_{\min}$ by switching the affine parameter from the areal radius $R$ to $-R$, and they present a numerically computed conformal diagram showing null horizons at radii $R_1$, $R_2$, $R_3$, a Cauchy horizon, and the dust-ball surface terminating at future null infinity.

Load-bearing premise

Everything after the bounce depends on the geometric choices that the shock lies exactly at the dust-ball surface and that the comoving radius keeps increasing monotonically through the minimal-radius surface; the paper itself flags the first choice as an open question.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, dust collapse in this framework produces a nonsingular black hole: every causal geodesic is complete and the classical singularity is replaced by a bounce.
  • The vacuum outside the collapsed dust ball is not a single static geometry but two quantum-corrected metrics joined at the minimal radius, one Schwarzschild-like and one de Sitter-like, each carrying an infinite series of quantum corrections.
  • A weak $C^0$ shock at the dust-ball surface is a genuine prediction of asymmetric-bounce collapse, with a diverging Kretschmann scalar at $R_{\min}$ that nevertheless does not terminate geodesics.
  • The spacetime inherits a Cauchy horizon at $R_2$, so the regular black hole still has a boundary of predictability that future work on backreaction and mass inflation would have to address.
  • The same dynamics, reduced to a homogeneous and isotropic universe, is claimed to reproduce the asymmetric LQC cosmological bounce, connecting black-hole formation with early-universe evolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same junction machinery could be applied to asymmetric-bounce collapse with pressure or with Hawking-evaporation backreaction; if the shock persists, it may carry a distributional thin-shell stress-energy whose mass would feed back on the horizon radii.
  • The paper's open question about alternative junction surfaces could be tested by a variational calculation over timelike hypersurfaces in the vacuum; a valid alternative surface away from $x = x_b$ would relocate the shock and change the conformal diagram.
  • The de Sitter-like vacuum region suggests a concrete prediction for gravitational-wave echoes or quasinormal-mode spectra that differs from symmetric-bounce models, since the exterior is not a single corrected Schwarzschild geometry.
  • The geodesic-completeness argument motivates a search for a global double-null coordinate chart that covers both the post-bounce interior and the two vacuum patches analytically, which would decide whether the shock is truly $C^0$ or only an artifact of the chosen matching.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse of a homogeneous dust ball in an effective LTB dynamics derived from asymmetric loop quantum cosmology. It derives the interior and exterior geometries, constructs a C^0 junction at the dust surface, finds a post-bounce extrinsic-curvature jump, numerically computes a conformal diagram with multiple horizons and a Cauchy horizon, and derives two vacuum metrics (quantum-corrected Schwarzschild-like and de Sitter-like). The central claim is that this is the first fully dynamical regular black hole formation in an LQC-based model, with geodesic completeness and a genuine physical shock. The paper is explicit about several open questions, including the distributional consistency of the shock and the choice of junction surface.

Significance. If the open questions are resolved, the result would be significant: it would replace the singular interior of the classical OS collapse with a geodesically complete bounce in an LQG-inspired framework, sharply distinguishing asymmetric from symmetric LQC bounce models. The paper's strengths include the explicit algebraic derivation of the junction system (17)-(19), the closed-form vacuum line elements (53)-(55) with their classical limits, and the transparent numerical construction of the conformal diagram; no target observable is fitted, and the input parameters (rho_0, x_b, gamma, alpha_Delta, kappa) are declared. The main caveat, acknowledged by the authors, is that the physical-shock and completeness conclusions are conditional on matching and distributional assumptions that are not yet verified.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.B and Sec. VI] The identification of the post-bounce surface as a genuine C^0 shock is not verified against the distributional field equations. The junction conditions in Sec. III.B enforce continuity of the induced metric and yield a non-zero jump in the extrinsic curvature, Eq. (26) and Fig. 2, which generically sources a surface stress-energy tensor; the matter action (1) contains only dust with no surface term. The authors explicitly defer this check in Sec. VI, listing as open the question whether the discontinuity signals a thin shell and whether such a shell could introduce dynamical inconsistencies. Until the distributional form of the effective equations (3) is analyzed (analogously to Refs. [62, 74-76]), the physical-shock claim and the resulting conformal diagram could change, including the horizon radii and the completeness conclusion.
  2. [Sec. III.B and Sec. IV.C] The geodesic-completeness claim depends on two assumptions that are not derived from the dynamics: (i) the post-bounce junction surface coincides with the dust-ball surface x = x_b, which Sec. III.B states is an open question; and (ii) the comoving coordinate x remains monotonic through R_min, which Sec. IV.C (footnote 3) imposes to fix the null-geodesic extension. If an alternative self-consistent junction surface exists, or if x fails to be monotonic, the shock location, the conformal diagram in Fig. 5, and the completeness conclusion would all change. The paper should either prove these choices are forced by the effective LTB equations or treat the headline claim as conditional.
  3. [Sec. IV.C and Sec. VI] The paper claims geodesic completeness in the abstract and Sec. VI, but the explicit extension analysis in Sec. IV.C covers only radial null geodesics. Timelike geodesics crossing the minimal-radius surface R_min are described qualitatively in Sec. V (they 'bounce at R_min'), yet no proof is given that they admit a global extension through R_min, where the Kretschmann scalar diverges and the metric is only C^0. Since geodesic completeness is a statement about all causal geodesics (including non-radial ones, which are not discussed), the completeness claim is not yet established.
  4. [Sec. III.B, Eqs. (24)-(25)] The existence of the shock depends on the choice of the plus-sign branch in Eqs. (24)-(25). The minus branch is dismissed as 'typically' giving the trivial junction, but no general proof or physical criterion is provided to exclude it in the post-bounce phase. Because the branch choice determines whether the extrinsic-curvature jump and the proper-time discontinuity occur, the shock and the time-asymmetric causal structure rest on an unproven selection.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV.E] In the paragraph after Eq. (48), 'For the results in Fig. 7' should read 'Fig. 5', since Fig. 7 is the pure-vacuum diagram and does not involve the dust-ball surface.
  2. [Sec. VI] 'Schwarzchild' in the first paragraphs is a typo for 'Schwarzschild'.
  3. [Sec. IV.A] The sentence 'We find three distinct positive roots of Eq. (35)' is imprecise because eta_inf is also positive; the text immediately acknowledges this as an additional root. Please reword to avoid the apparent inconsistency.
  4. [Sec. IV.C] In the text near footnote 3, 'unambiguous extension' is weakened by the conditional 'under the choice that x remains monotonic'; the wording should be aligned with the conditional nature of the assumption.
  5. [Fig. 5 caption] The phrase 'featuring a null horizons at radius R_1' should be 'featuring null horizons at radius R_1'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the shock and completeness results are computed from imported LQC effective dynamics with explicit, acknowledged modeling choices, not from fitted targets or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central input is the effective Friedmann equation (3), imported from the external LTB polymerized-dynamics literature [57-59], with gamma fixed by black-hole entropy results [67,68] and alpha_Delta from the LQG area gap; none of these parameters is fitted to any output of the present paper. The shock analysis in Sec. III is a calculation: the junction ODEs (24)-(25) follow from coordinate-transformation consistency and areal-radius continuity, and the discontinuity in K_theta_theta (Eq. (26), Fig. 2) is computed, not imposed. The paper explicitly states the assumption that the post-bounce junction surface is the dust-ball surface (Sec. III.B) and openly leaves the alternative junction as an open question; this is an acknowledged modeling assumption, not a hidden equivalence. Similarly, the geodesic-completeness extension in Sec. IV.C is explicitly conditional on the stated choice that x remains monotonic through R_min, with the affine-parameter continuation derived rather than defined as complete. The paper's self-citations ([27,28] for conformal-diagram techniques, [53,54] for the asymmetric-bounce input, [62] for distributional thin shells) are either procedural, derived in prior independent quantization work with stated assumptions that do not include the OS-collapse target, or flagged as future work. The unverified distributional consistency of the C^0 shock is a real correctness and completeness risk noted by the authors (Sec. VI), but it is a gap in verification, not a circular reduction of a claim to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted target observables: rho_0 and x_b are example values for the numerical plots, gamma and alpha_Delta are standard LQG inputs from cited work, and kappa is a visual compactification parameter. The central claim rests instead on imported effective dynamics (Eq. (3) from [57-59]) and on three modeling choices: the junction surface placed at the dust boundary, the plus-branch selection in the junction ODEs, and the monotonic-x extension through R_min. These choices are declared in the text, so they are assumptions rather than hidden circularities, but they do have load-bearing weight for the shock location and the completeness conclusion. No new particles or fields are added; the shock is a derived geometric feature.

free parameters (4)
  • rho_0 (initial dust density) = 0.006 (Planck units)
    Used for the numerical example; the qualitative claims are said to hold for sufficiently high mass, so the example value is an input, not fitted.
  • x_b (initial dust ball radius) = 10 (Planck units)
    This sets the total mass to about 25 in Planck units; a numerical input for the plotted solutions.
  • gamma (Barbero-Immirzi parameter) = 0.23
    Fixed from black hole entropy in [67,68]; a standard LQG input, not fitted here.
  • kappa (compactification parameter) = 0.1
    Dimensionless parameter controlling the visual compactification in Eq. (49); does not affect the physics.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The effective Friedmann equation (3), i.e. the asymmetric LQC modification to LTB dynamics, is taken as the starting point.
    Invoked throughout; imported from [57-59] and not re-derived from full LQG in this paper. Quote: Eq. (3) in Sec. II.
  • standard math The Israel-type junction conditions with continuous induced metric and Eq. (26) for extrinsic curvature are assumed to hold.
    Standard GR junction formalism, used in Sec. III.A.
  • ad hoc to paper The shock or junction surface coincides with the dust ball surface x=x_b in the post-bounce region.
    Flagged in Sec. III.B and VI as an assumption; an alternative surface is left open.
  • ad hoc to paper The plus-sign branch in Eqs. (24)-(25) is selected for the post-bounce junction.
    The minus branch is stated to typically give a trivial geodesic matching, but this is not proven in detail. See Sec. III.A.
  • ad hoc to paper The comoving coordinate x remains monotonic through the R_min surface, fixing the null geodesic extension.
    Explicitly stated as a choice in Sec. IV.C; geodesic completeness depends on it.
  • standard math The dust field provides a global time function in the LTB chart.
    Standard for LTB dust collapse; line element (2) and dust time gauge in Sec. II.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymmetric Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder Collapse." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3N6BPLGM

@misc{pith2026260805818,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymmetric Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder Collapse},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3N6BPLGM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05818}
}
read the original abstract

We study black hole formation resulting from the collapse of a homogeneous and isotropic dust ball within a framework built upon loop quantum cosmology. Using loop dynamics formulated for Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi spacetimes---which reduce to the asymmetric loop quantum cosmological bounce scenario---we analyze the dust ball undergoing power-law contraction followed by a de Sitter-like expansion. We discover an emergence of a physical shock at the dust ball surface, characterized by a continuous induced metric and a discontinuous extrinsic curvature arising from a dynamical mismatch between the expanding interior and the contracting exterior vacuum shells. Furthermore, we explicitly derive two variants of Schwarzschild-like line elements for the vacuum sector, and we demonstrate that the resulting spacetime is geodesically complete featuring a rich causal structure. This establishes, for the first time, fully dynamical regular black hole formation within a framework consistent with loop quantum cosmology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05818 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Timelike geodesics (or constant- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The discontinuity of the extrinsic curvature, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The areal radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Numerically computed conformal diagram for the asymmetric OS collapse scenario. Prior to the bounce, the surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Metric functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Schematic conformal diagram for the pure vacuum of the studied dynamics. The central vacuum region containing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and H. Snyder, On Continued gravi- tational contraction, Phys. Rev.56, 455 (1939)

    1939

  2. [2]

    Expanding Eq

    Under this transformation, the metric (45) takes the form ds2 =−f(R)dt 2 + dR2 f(R) +R 2dΩ2 (53) where f(R) := 1−N 2 = 1− 24/3GM −4α2 ∆Gγ2M+R 3 + Ξ(R)σ −8α2 ∆Gγ2(1 +γ 2)M+R 3 + Ξ(R)σ 4/3 (R3 + Ξ(R)σ)8/3 (54) and the value of the parameterσselects the specific vacuum solution. Expanding Eq. (54) for largeR(that is, 13 FIG. 5. Numerically computed conformal...

  3. [3]

    (5) yields the corresponding values for the areal radius, which obey the hierarchyR min < R1 < R2 < R3

    Substituting these roots into Eq. (5) yields the corresponding values for the areal radius, which obey the hierarchyR min < R1 < R2 < R3. Eq. (35) possesses an additional root, namely ηinf = 2 3 α∆γ2 < η1, however, this corresponds to the limitR→ ∞. Because this value of the areal radius is reached only at infinite affine time along both timelike (see Fig...

  4. [4]

    Datt, ¨Uber eine Klasse von L¨ osungen der Gravitation- sgleichungen der Relativit¨ at, Z

    B. Datt, ¨Uber eine Klasse von L¨ osungen der Gravitation- sgleichungen der Relativit¨ at, Z. Phys.108, 314 (1938)

    1938

  5. [5]

    Markovic and S

    D. Markovic and S. Shapiro, Gravitational collapse with a cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D61, 084029 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9912066

    arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    Peleg, The Spectrum of quantum dust black holes, Phys

    Y. Peleg, The Spectrum of quantum dust black holes, Phys. Lett. B356, 462 (1995)

    1995

  7. [7]

    Govender and N

    M. Govender and N. Dadhich, Collapsing sphere on the brane radiates, Phys. Lett. B538, 233 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0109086

    arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    Bojowald, T

    M. Bojowald, T. Harada, and R. Tibrewala, Lemaitre- Tolman-Bondi collapse from the perspective of loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D78, 064057 (2008), arXiv:0806.2593 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2008

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    Bambi, D

    C. Bambi, D. Malafarina, and L. Modesto, Non-singular quantum-inspired gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044009 (2013), arXiv:1305.4790 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, L. Modesto, and C. Bambi, Can static 18 regular black holes form from gravitational collapse?, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 96 (2015), arXiv:1404.4770 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Schmitz, Towards a quantum Oppenheimer- Snyder model, Phys

    T. Schmitz, Towards a quantum Oppenheimer- Snyder model, Phys. Rev. D101, 026016 (2020), arXiv:1912.08175 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Piechocki and T

    W. Piechocki and T. Schmitz, Quantum Oppenheimer- Snyder model, Phys. Rev. D102, 046004 (2020), arXiv:2004.02939 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Schmitz, Exteriors to bouncing collapse models, Phys

    T. Schmitz, Exteriors to bouncing collapse models, Phys. Rev. D103, 064074 (2021), arXiv:2012.04383 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    M¨ unch, Effective quantum dust collapse via sur- face matching, Class

    J. M¨ unch, Effective quantum dust collapse via sur- face matching, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 175015 (2021), arXiv:2010.13480 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ben Achour, S

    J. Ben Achour, S. Brahma, and J.-P. Uzan, Bounc- ing compact objects. Part I. Quantum extension of the Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse, JCAP03, 041, arXiv:2001.06148 [gr-qc]

    2001 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ben Achour and J.-P

    J. Ben Achour and J.-P. Uzan, Bouncing compact ob- jects. II. Effective theory of a pulsating Planck star, Phys. Rev. D102, 124041 (2020), arXiv:2001.06153 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Ben Achour, S

    J. Ben Achour, S. Brahma, S. Mukohyama, and J. P. Uzan, Towards consistent black-to-white hole bounces from matter collapse, JCAP09, 020, arXiv:2004.12977 [gr-qc]

    2004 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bonanno, D

    A. Bonanno, D. Malafarina, and A. Panassiti, Dust Collapse in Asymptotic Safety: A Path to Regular Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 031401 (2024), arXiv:2308.10890 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Black hole collapse and bounce in effective loop quan- tum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 04LT01 (2021), arXiv:2006.09325 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Effective loop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D102, 106024 (2020), arXiv:2006.09302 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Husain, J

    V. Husain, J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson- Ewing, Quantum Gravity of Dust Collapse: Shock Waves from Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 121301 (2022), arXiv:2109.08667 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Husain, J

    V. Husain, J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson- Ewing, Fate of quantum black holes, Phys. Rev. D106, 024014 (2022), arXiv:2203.04238 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Giesel, M

    K. Giesel, M. Han, B.-F. Li, H. Liu, and P. Singh, Spher- ical symmetric gravitational collapse of a dust cloud: Polymerized dynamics in reduced phase space, Phys. Rev. D107, 044047 (2023), arXiv:2212.01930 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Lewandowski, Y

    J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, J. Yang, and C. Zhang, Quan- tum Oppenheimer-Snyder and Swiss Cheese Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 101501 (2023), arXiv:2210.02253 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bobula and T

    M. Bobula and T. Paw lowski, Rainbow Oppenheimer- Snyder collapse and the entanglement entropy produc- tion, Phys. Rev. D108, 026016 (2023), arXiv:2303.12708 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Fazzini, C

    F. Fazzini, C. Rovelli, and F. Soltani, Painlev´ e- Gullstrand coordinates discontinuity in the quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder model, Phys. Rev. D108, 044009 (2023), arXiv:2307.07797 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. Han, C. Rovelli, and F. Soltani, Geometry of the black-to-white hole transition within a single asymptotic region, Phys. Rev. D107, 064011 (2023), arXiv:2302.03872 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bobula, Cosmic inflation prevents singularity forma- tion in collapse into a Hayward black hole, Class

    M. Bobula, Cosmic inflation prevents singularity forma- tion in collapse into a Hayward black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 065027 (2025), arXiv:2404.12243 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bobula and T

    M. Bobula and T. Paw lowski, Quantum dust collapse with cosmological constant and methods for constructing conformal diagrams, Phys. Rev. D112, 026005 (2025), arXiv:2410.22605 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bobula and T

    M. Bobula and T. Paw lowski, Causal structure of nonho- mogeneous dust collapse in effective loop quantum grav- ity, Phys. Rev. D112, 064056 (2025), arXiv:2410.22943 [gr-qc]

    2025

  23. [31]

    Cafaro and J

    L. Cafaro and J. Lewandowski, Status of Birkhoff’s the- orem in the polymerized semiclassical regime of loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D110, 024072 (2024), arXiv:2403.01910 [gr-qc]

    2024

  24. [32]

    Cafaro and F

    L. Cafaro and F. Soltani, Loop quantization of the marginally bound Lema ˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi dust model, Phys. Rev. D114, 024078 (2026), arXiv:2603.04995 [gr- qc]

    2026 arXiv

  25. [33]

    E. I. Duque, Emergent modified gravity: The perfect fluid and gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D109, 044014 (2024), arXiv:2311.08616 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bojowald, E

    M. Bojowald, E. I. Duque, and D. Hartmann, Covari- ant Lema ˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi collapse in models of loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D111, 064002 (2025), arXiv:2412.18054 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Z. Shi, X. Zhang, and Y. Ma, Higher-dimensional quan- tum Oppenheimer-Snyder model, Phys. Rev. D110, 104074 (2024), arXiv:2408.15821 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ou and X

    M. Ou and X. Zhang, Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder models in loop quantum cosmology with Lorentz term, Phys. Rev. D112, 126016 (2025), arXiv:2508.01183 [gr- qc]

    2025

  29. [37]

    Alonso-Bardaji and D

    A. Alonso-Bardaji and D. Brizuela, Nonsingular collapse of a spherical dust cloud, Phys. Rev. D109, 064023 (2024), arXiv:2312.15505 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Malafarina and B

    D. Malafarina and B. Toshmatov, Connection between regular black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics and semiclassical dust collapse, Phys. Rev. D105, L121502 (2022), arXiv:2204.04025 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Shojai, A

    F. Shojai, A. Sadeghi, and R. Hassannejad, General- ized Oppenheimer–Snyder gravitational collapse into reg- ular black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 085003 (2022), arXiv:2202.14024 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, ´A. J. Mur- cia, and A. Vicente-Cano, Regular black holes from Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse, Phys. Rev. D112, 064039 (2025), arXiv:2505.09680 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Li, J.-P

    S. Li, J.-P. Wu, and X.-H. Ge, Non-singular cosmolo- gies matching regular black holes, arXiv:2512.00926 [gr- qc] (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Ashtekar and M

    A. Ashtekar and M. Bojowald, Quantum geometry and the Schwarzschild singularity, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 391 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0509075

    2006 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Gambini and J

    R. Gambini and J. Pullin, Black holes in loop quantum gravity: The Complete space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 161301 (2008), arXiv:0805.1187 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gambini and J

    R. Gambini and J. Pullin, Loop quantization of the Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 211301 (2013), arXiv:1302.5265 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Gambini, J

    R. Gambini, J. Olmedo, and J. Pullin, Quantum black holes in Loop Quantum Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 095009 (2014), arXiv:1310.5996 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Olmedo, S

    J. Olmedo, S. Saini, and P. Singh, From black holes to 19 white holes: a quantum gravitational, symmetric bounce, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 225011 (2017), arXiv:1707.07333 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ashtekar, J

    A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh, Quantum Trans- figuration of Kruskal Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 241301 (2018), arXiv:1806.00648 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Ashtekar, J

    A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh, Quantum exten- sion of the Kruskal spacetime, Phys. Rev. D98, 126003 (2018), arXiv:1806.02406 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Bodendorfer, F

    N. Bodendorfer, F. M. Mele, and J. M¨ unch, Effective Quantum Extended Spacetime of Polymer Schwarzschild Black Hole, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 195015 (2019), arXiv:1902.04542 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Ashtekar and P

    A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 213001 (2011), arXiv:1108.0893 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Agull´ o, A

    I. Agull´ o, A. Wang, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Loop quan- tum cosmology: relation between theory and observa- tions, inHandbook of Quantum Gravity(Springer, 2023) arXiv:2301.10215 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Ashtekar, T

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Quantum na- ture of the big bang, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 141301 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0602086

    2006 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Ashtekar, T

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Quantum Na- ture of the Big Bang: An Analytical and Numerical In- vestigation. I., Phys. Rev. D73, 124038 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0604013

    2006

  46. [54]

    Ashtekar, T

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Quantum Na- ture of the Big Bang: Improved dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 74, 084003 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607039

    2006 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Assanioussi, A

    M. Assanioussi, A. Dapor, K. Liegener, and T. Paw lowski, Emergent de Sitter Epoch of the Quantum Cosmos from Loop Quantum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 081303 (2018), arXiv:1801.00768 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Assanioussi, A

    M. Assanioussi, A. Dapor, K. Liegener, and T. Paw lowski, Emergent de Sitter epoch of the Loop Quantum Cosmos: a detailed analysis, Phys. Rev. D 100, 084003 (2019), arXiv:1906.05315 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Giesel, H

    K. Giesel, H. Liu, P. Singh, and S. A. Weigl, General- ized analysis of a dust collapse in effective loop quantum gravity: Fate of shocks and covariance, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104016 (2024), arXiv:2308.10953 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Giesel, H

    K. Giesel, H. Liu, E. Rullit, P. Singh, and S. A. Weigl, Embedding generalized Lema ˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi models in polymerized spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D110, 104017 (2024), arXiv:2308.10949 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Giesel, H

    K. Giesel, H. Liu, P. Singh, and S. A. Weigl, Regular black holes and their relationship to polymerized models and mimetic gravity, Phys. Rev. D111, 064064 (2025), arXiv:2405.03554 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Fazzini, K

    F. Fazzini, K. Giesel, and E. Rullit, Formation of shell- crossing singularities in effective gravitational collapse models with bounded and unbounded polymerizations, arXiv:2604.13716 [gr-qc] (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Giesel, H

    K. Giesel, H. Liu, and E. Rullit, Investigation of the gravitational dust collapse of the LQG-inspired effec- tive asymmetric bounce model, arXiv:2602.15227 [gr-qc] (2026)

    2026

  54. [62]

    Fazzini, V

    F. Fazzini, V. Husain, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Shell- crossings and shock formation during gravitational col- lapse in effective loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 109, 084052 (2024), arXiv:2312.02032 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Liu and D

    H. Liu and D. Qu, Quantum induced shock dynamics in gravitational collapse: insights from effective models and numerical frameworks, arXiv:2504.18462 [gr-qc] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bobula and F

    M. Bobula and F. Fazzini, Quantum gravitational stellar evolution beyond shell-crossing singularities, Phys. Rev. D113, 106016 (2026), arXiv:2601.18618 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and ´A. J. Murcia, Dynamical Formation of Regular Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 181401 (2025), arXiv:2412.02742 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and ´A. J. Murcia, Regular black hole formation in four-dimensional non- polynomial gravities, Phys. Rev. D113, 024019 (2026), arXiv:2509.19016 [gr-qc]

    2026

  59. [67]

    Thiemann, Quantum spin dynamics (qsd)

    T. Thiemann, Quantum spin dynamics (qsd). 2., Class. Quant. Grav.15, 875 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9606090

    1998 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Thiemann, Quantum spin dynamics (QSD), Class

    T. Thiemann, Quantum spin dynamics (QSD), Class. Quant. Grav.15, 839 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9606089

    1998 arXiv

  61. [69]

    K. A. Meissner, Black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 5245 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0407052

    2004

  62. [70]

    Domagala and J

    M. Domagala and J. Lewandowski, Black hole entropy from quantum geometry, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 5233 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407051

    2004 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    E. Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    2009

  64. [72]

    S. A. Hayward, Black holes: New horizons, in9th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theo- retical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation and Relativistic Field Theories (MG 9)(2000) pp. 568– 580, arXiv:gr-qc/0008071

    2000 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Faraoni, G

    V. Faraoni, G. F. R. Ellis, J. T. Firouzjaee, A. Helou, and I. Musco, Foliation dependence of black hole apparent horizons in spherical symmetry, Phys. Rev. D95, 024008 (2017), arXiv:1610.05822 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Poisson and W

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, Structure of the Black Hole Nucleus, Class. Quant. Grav.5, L201 (1988)

    1988

  67. [75]

    Alesci, M

    E. Alesci, M. Assanioussi, and J. Lewandowski, Curva- ture operator for loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D89, 124017 (2014), arXiv:1403.3190 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Fazzini, Effective LQG dynamics of a thin shell and the fate of a collapsing star, Phys

    F. Fazzini, Effective LQG dynamics of a thin shell and the fate of a collapsing star, Phys. Rev. D113, 026020 (2026), arXiv:2509.04945 [gr-qc]

    2026

  69. [77]

    Sahlmann and C

    H. Sahlmann and C. Zhang, Dust shell in effective loop quantum black hole model, Phys. Rev. D112, 084079 (2025), arXiv:2506.04589 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Qu and C

    D. Qu and C. Zhang, Consistent gauge conditions for dust-shell dynamics in effective quantum gravity (2026), arXiv:2603.24168 [gr-qc]

    2026

  71. [79]

    Poisson and W

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1663 (1989)

    1989

  72. [80]

    Poisson and W

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, Internal structure of black holes, Phys. Rev. D41, 1796 (1990)

    1990

  73. [81]

    Ori, Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution, Phys

    A. Ori, Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 789 (1991)

    1991

  74. [82]

    Liu and I

    H. Liu and I. Soranidis, Probing mass inflation in poly- merized vacuum regular black holes via colliding null shells, arXiv:2604.27897 [gr-qc] (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Simpson and M

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, Black-bounce to traversable wormhole, JCAP02, 042, arXiv:1812.07114 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Phenomenological aspects of black holes be- yond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D98, 124009 (2018), 20 arXiv:1809.08238 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio, and M. Visser, Regular black holes without mass inflation instability, JHEP09, 118, arXiv:2205.13556 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    Ovalle, Black holes without Cauchy horizons and in- tegrable singularities, Phys

    J. Ovalle, Black holes without Cauchy horizons and in- tegrable singularities, Phys. Rev. D107, 104005 (2023), arXiv:2305.00030 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, and J. Yang, Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity: A solution without Cauchy horizons, Phys. Rev. D112, 044054 (2025), arXiv:2412.02487 [gr-qc]

    2025

  80. [88]

    Calz´ a, M

    M. Calz´ a, M. Rinaldi, and S. Zerbini, Topological regular black holes without a Cauchy horizon, Phys. Rev. D112, 024024 (2025), arXiv:2505.04427 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  81. [89]

    S. A. Hayward, Formation and evaporation of regular black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 031103 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0506126

    2006

  82. [90]

    Bambiet al., Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation (2025) arXiv:2505.09014 [gr-qc]

    C. Bambiet al., Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation (2025) arXiv:2505.09014 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Ashtekar and M

    A. Ashtekar and M. Bojowald, Black hole evaporation: A Paradigm, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 3349 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0504029

    2005

  84. [92]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Mass Inflation without Cauchy Horizons, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 181402 (2024), arXiv:2402.14913 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.