REVIEW 1 cited by
The variational method, backreactions, and the absorption probability in Wald type problems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We argue that the variational method in Wald type thought experiments, involves order of magnitude problems when one imposes the fact that $\delta M$ is inherently a first order quantity itself. One observes that the contribution of the second order perturbations is actually of the fourth order. Therefore backreactions have to be explicitly calculated. Here, we re-consider the overspinning problem for Kerr-Newman black holes interacting with test fields. We calculate the backreaction effects due to the induced increase in the angular velocity of the event horizon, which brings a partial solution to the overspinning problem. To bring an ultimate solution, we argue that the absorption probability should be taken into account in Wald type problems where black holes interact with test fields. This fundamentally alters the course of the analysis of the thought experiments. Due to the fact that a small fraction of the challenging modes is absorbed by the black holes, overspinning is prevented for both nearly extremal and extremal cases. Some extreme cases are easily fixed by backreaction effects. The arguments do not apply to the generic overspinning by fermionic fields for which the absorption probability is positive definite.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The First Law and Weak Cosmic Censorship for de Sitter Black Holes
An Iyer-Wald first law is established for general perturbations of Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sitter black holes, and a second-order Sorce-Wald argument shows that near-extremal such black holes cannot be overcharged under...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.