Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Open-string entanglement on dynamical branes equals closed-string gravitational entropy after geometric transition.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 01:52 UTC pith:3XIEX2HO

load-bearing objection Solid extension of the author's topological-string program: multi-interval modular flow and anyonic EE match gravitational replica EE for a broad class of CY backgrounds, but the replica Euler-class split is under-constrained. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03526 v2 pith:3XIEX2HO submitted 2026-07-03 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP

Entanglement and geometric transitions in topological string theory

Gabriel Wong This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords local holographyentanglement branesgeometric transitiontopological string theoryanyonic entanglement entropyquantum traceopen-closed TQFTgravitational replica entropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks how a bulk subsystem can be defined in quantum gravity when diffeomorphism invariance blocks any rigid spatial cut. It answers by realizing local holography inside A-model topological string theory: a closed-string subregion is replaced by open strings that end on entanglement branes, which act as a dynamical entangling surface. When those branes undergo a geometric transition they dissolve into closed-string flux, fusing the subregions and producing a new Calabi–Yau background. The authors construct the corresponding subregion open-string algebra (a quantum-group algebra whose degrees of freedom are anyonic), equip it with a large-N quantum trace, and give a complete ribbon diagrammatics for modular flow on arbitrary states and possibly disconnected subregions. They then verify that the anyonic entanglement entropy of the open strings, computed with that quantum trace, exactly reproduces the gravitational replica entropy of the dual closed-string geometry. The construction therefore supplies a concrete bulk mechanism in which entanglement of edge modes back-reacts and creates spacetime.

Core claim

For Calabi–Yau threefolds that are rank-two bundles over a Riemann surface, and for arbitrary (possibly disconnected) subregions, the anyonic entanglement entropy of the subregion open-string algebra computed with the large-N quantum trace equals the gravitational replica entropy of the dual closed-string background: S_replica = −etr(ρ log ρ).

What carries the argument

The geometric transition of entanglement branes: stacks of non-compact Lagrangian branes carrying a distinguished holonomy dissolve into closed-string flux, converting an open-string annulus into a closed-string Calabi–Yau and thereby implementing local holography.

Load-bearing premise

The way the bundle data of the replica manifold are chosen—so that the two Euler classes grow symmetrically with the number of replicas—is not forced by the entanglement of a fixed state; other choices still keep the geometry Calabi–Yau but change the gravitational entropy.

What would settle it

Compute the anyonic open-string entropy and the closed-string gravitational replica entropy for a higher-genus base or for multiple disconnected intervals and check whether the equality continues to hold once the large-N quantum trace is used.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper realizes local holography in A-model topological string theory on Calabi–Yau threefolds that are rank-two bundles over a Riemann surface. A bulk subsystem is defined by open strings ending on entanglement branes (non-compact Lagrangians with fixed holonomy U0). Local holography is implemented by the geometric transition of these branes. The authors construct a topological subregion open-string algebra L2(U(∞)q), develop ribbon/anyon diagrammatics for modular flow of arbitrary states and (possibly disconnected) subregions, and verify that the anyonic entanglement entropy computed with the large-N quantum trace equals the gravitational replica entropy of the dual closed-string background: S_replica = −etr(ρ log ρ). They further relate the transitions to defect holography and compute entropies of bubbling Calabi–Yaus obtained by inserting R-type branes.

Significance. This is a substantial, technically careful contribution to the program of defining bulk subsystems and gravitational entropy in a controlled string-theory setting. The explicit matching of anyonic open-string entropy to gravitational replica entropy for a broad class of backgrounds and subregions, the geometric interpretation of the entanglement-brane holonomy as brane moduli, the inclusion of framing, the treatment of multiple disconnected regions, and the modular-flow diagrammatics are genuine advances over the authors’ earlier works. The link between local geometric transitions and defect holography is conceptually useful. Explicit formulas (partition functions, quantum dimensions, reduced density matrices) make the checks reproducible. Non-unitarity of the perturbative amplitudes is acknowledged and does not invalidate the formal equalities.

major comments (1)
  1. [§2.3, Eqs. (2.31)–(2.33) and §3 (Cardy condition / Z(n)=etr ρ^n)] The gravitational replica entropy is defined by the Calabi–Yau condition k1(n)+k2(n)=−χ together with the additional ansatz k1(n)−k2(n)=n(k1−k2) (Eqs. 2.31–2.33). The text’s justification—that the replica should not introduce data unrelated to the n=1 state—does not by itself exclude other families with f(n) where f(1)=0. Because the open-string modular operator ρ is constructed solely from the n=1 geometry (via zippers and open product/co-product), its spectrum is independent of f. Consequently the equality (1.1) holds only for one member of the family. The open-closed TQFT structure (gluing ρ^n and closing holes via the entanglement-brane axiom) should uniquely select the Euler-class data of the closed replica; this selection criterion should be stated explicitly in §2.3 or §3 so that the gravitational entropy is not left choice-dependent.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] Several typos appear throughout: “respsect” (abstract/intro), “annhilation”, “intepretation”, “Furthuremore”, “entanglemetn” (references), “connnected”, “ramificaiton”, “id entntified”, “degneerate”, “t’hooft”, “dimesions”, “corresopnds”, “langauge”. A careful proof-reading pass is needed.
  2. [§6.2] The reference [39] (“in preparation”) is cited for a proof that the Gibbons–Hawking entropy of the brane-inserted state equals the entanglement entropy of |ψ_R⟩. Either supply a short sketch or soften the claim in §6.2 to “we expect”.
  3. [§2.2] Notation for quantum dimensions (dq vs ˜dq, factors of i, and the relation to Bryan–Pandharipande) is introduced in several places; a short summary table or consistent convention statement early in §2 would help the reader.
  4. [§2.2–2.3] The discussion of phases (2.29) and their absorption into a B-field shift is brief; a sentence clarifying whether they affect the final entropy formulas after the large-N limit would improve clarity.
  5. [Figures 1–2 and inline diagrams] Figures are described in text (toric diagrams, ribbon graphs, replica gluings). Ensure all edge labels (framing vectors, holonomies, Euler classes) are legible in the final PDF and that every diagram referenced in the text is numbered.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

Entropy equality S_replica = -etr(ρ log ρ) holds largely by construction of the entanglement-brane axiom that enforces open traces equal closed amplitudes

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 3, eqs. (3.7)–(3.9), (3.16)–(3.17)]
    "The upshot is that any open extension of the A model TQFT leads the statistical formula S_replica = −etr ho log ho (3.17)"

    The open-closed TQFT is defined by imposing the entanglement-brane axiom that forces every hole traced by the boundary state to close, thereby equating closed replica partition functions Z(n) with open-string traces etr ho^n. The entropy equality is therefore an immediate consequence of the axioms rather than an independent derivation from first principles.

  2. self definitional [Section 2.3, eqs. (2.31)–(2.33) and subsequent replica entropy (2.45)]
    "To resolve this issue, we fix the ambiguity by requiring that k1(n)−k2(n)=n(k1−k2). This choice is symmetric between k1 and k2."

    The gravitational replica entropy is computed only after an extra symmetry assumption on the difference of Euler classes is inserted by hand. The open-string modular operator (built solely from the n=1 geometry) is independent of that choice; the numerical match therefore holds only for the particular ansatz selected on the closed side, rendering the claimed identification choice-dependent by construction.

  3. self citation load bearing [Introduction and Section 1, citations [1], [2], [3], [12]]
    "In [1], we argued that such a subsystem must support local holographic degrees of freedom. … building upon [2, 3]. … using the recent proposal for topological subregions in [12]."

    The conceptual premise (local holography via entanglement branes) and the topological-subregion algebra are imported from the author’s own prior papers; those works are not externally verified uniqueness theorems or machine-checked results, so the present equality rests in part on an unverified self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper constructs an open-closed extension of the A-model TQFT by imposing the entanglement-brane axiom (and Moore-Segal axioms) so that holes close and closed replica amplitudes equal open-string traces of the modular operator. Once that extension is in place, the statistical formula for gravitational entropy follows immediately from the 2-d topology of gluing (section 3). The subsequent large-N ribbon computations and multi-interval modular-flow diagrams are non-trivial and independently verify the same algebraic expression, so the result is not wholly vacuous; nevertheless the central equality is definitional once the axioms are accepted. The symmetric choice of replica Euler-class splitting is an additional modelling assumption that makes the match possible, but is not forced by the open-string side. Self-citations to the author’s prior works supply the local-holography premise and the special-case checks, yet the generalisation itself contains independent diagrammatic content. Overall circularity is therefore moderate (score 4), not total.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central matching of open and closed entropies rests on the A-model TQFT structure, the Calabi–Yau condition used as an on-shell constraint for the replica, the combinatorial quantization that replaces ordinary Chan–Paton factors by a quantum-group algebra, and the special holonomy that defines entanglement branes. No numerical free parameters are fitted; the continuous moduli (gs, t, k1, k2) are physical inputs of the background. The main invented objects are the entanglement branes themselves (with fixed holonomy U0) and the notion of local holography imported from the author’s earlier conceptual paper.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Calabi–Yau condition k1+k2=−χ(Σ) is imposed as the on-shell constraint that forces gravitational back-reaction of the replica bundle (Eqs. 2.5, 2.31).
    Standard for A-model topological strings on these backgrounds; used here to define the gravitational (as opposed to QFT) replica.
  • domain assumption Combinatorial (quantum-group) quantization of Chern–Simons supplies the diffeomorphism-invariant subregion algebra L2(U(N)q) (Section 7.1–7.2).
    Taken from Alekseev–Grosse–Schomerus and recent work of Mertens–Wu; replaces the UV-divergent Kac–Moody quantization used in earlier papers of the series.
  • ad hoc to paper Entanglement-brane axiom / spacetime Cardy condition: holes traced by the special boundary state |e⟩ can be closed, equating open traces to closed amplitudes (Eqs. 3.7–3.9, 3.11).
    Imposed to implement local holography; the specific holonomy U0 is chosen so that the geometric transition occurs.
  • standard math Moore–Segal axioms for the open-closed extension of the TQFT.
    Standard open-closed TQFT structure; used to guarantee that modular operators can be rewritten as purely open cobordisms.
  • ad hoc to paper Symmetric back-reaction ansatz k1(n)−k2(n)=n(k1−k2) for the replica Euler classes (Eq. 2.32).
    Not uniquely fixed by the CY condition; chosen for symmetry between the two line bundles.
invented entities (2)
  • Entanglement branes (non-compact Lagrangian branes with fixed holonomy U0 = Diag(q−i+1/2)) no independent evidence
    purpose: Serve as dynamical entangling surfaces whose geometric transition implements local holography and supplies the shrinkable boundary condition.
    The special holonomy is tuned so that trR(U0) equals the quantum dimension that produces the closed-string partition function; independent evidence outside this series is limited to related large-N transitions in the topological-string literature.
  • Local holography (bulk entangling surface supporting holographic edge modes that back-react) no independent evidence
    purpose: Conceptual framework, introduced in the author’s prior work, that the present paper realizes in topological strings.
    Imported from Wong:2025kpz; the present paper supplies a concrete string realization rather than independent experimental or lattice evidence.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 39509 in / 3538 out tokens · 33564 ms · 2026-07-12T01:52:02.455901+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

How do we define a bulk subsystem in quantum gravity? In \cite{Wong:2025kpz}, we argued that such a subsystem must support local holographic degrees of freedom. These are gravitational edge modes, whose entanglement creates a backreaction that fuses together subregions of spacetime. In this work we give a realization of these ideas in topological string theory, building upon \cite{Donnelly:2020teo,Jiang:2020cqo}. In this theory, a subsystem for closed strings consists of open strings ending on entanglement branes, which play the role of a dynamical entangling surface. Local holography is implemented by the geometric transition of these branes. We define a subregion open string algebra and develop a diagrammatics for open string modular flow for arbitrary states and subregion. We check that the entanglement entropy of these open strings reproduces the gravitational entropy of the associated closed string background. Finally, we relate these local transitions to defect holography.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Entanglement and local holography in quantum gravity,

    G. Wong, “Entanglement and local holography in quantum gravity,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34 no. 16, (2025) 2544021,arXiv:2504.03452 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part I. Generalized entropy for closed strings,

    W. Donnelly, Y. Jiang, M. Kim, and G. Wong, “Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part I. Generalized entropy for closed strings,”JHEP10(2021) 201, arXiv:2010.15737 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part II. The dual gauge theory story,

    Y. Jiang, M. Kim, and G. Wong, “Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part II. The dual gauge theory story,”JHEP10(2021) 202,arXiv:2012.13397 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox,”JHEP2020 no. 09, (2020) 002,arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th].https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08255

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    The page curve of hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, “The page curve of hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,”JHEP2020no. 03, (2020) 149,arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10996

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Replica wormholes and the entropy of hawking radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Replica wormholes and the entropy of hawking radiation,”JHEP2020no. 05, (2020) 013,arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th].https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12333

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Cool horizons for entangled black holes,

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled black holes,”Fortsch. Phys.61 (2013) 781–811,arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]. – 61 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,”JHEP04(2003) 021, arXiv:hep-th/0106112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    Comments on quantum gravity and entanglement,

    M. Van Raamsdonk, “Comments on quantum gravity and entanglement,”arXiv:0907.2939 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,

    M. Van Raamsdonk, “Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,”Gen. Rel. Grav.42 (2010) 2323–2329,arXiv:1005.3035 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, “Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,” arXiv:1601.04744 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Topological subregions in Chern Simons theory and topological string theory,

    G. Wong, “Topological subregions in Chern Simons theory and topological string theory,” arXiv:2511.08746 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  13. [13]

    On the gauge theory / geometry correspondence,

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “On the gauge theory / geometry correspondence,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 1415–1443,arXiv:hep-th/9811131 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  14. [14]

    BIons in topological string theory,

    T. Okuda, “BIons in topological string theory,”JHEP01(2008) 062,arXiv:0705.0722 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    Wilson loops, geometric transitions and bubbling Calabi-Yau’s,

    J. Gomis and T. Okuda, “Wilson loops, geometric transitions and bubbling Calabi-Yau’s,” JHEP02(2007) 083,arXiv:hep-th/0612190 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  16. [16]

    D-branes as a Bubbling Calabi-Yau,

    J. Gomis and T. Okuda, “D-branes as a Bubbling Calabi-Yau,”JHEP07(2007) 005, arXiv:0704.3080 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113–1133,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  18. [18]

    Entanglement Entropy in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,

    D. L. Jafferis and D. K. Kolchmeyer, “Entanglement Entropy in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,” arXiv:1911.10663 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  19. [19]

    Entanglement branes, modular flow, and extended topological quantum field theory,

    W. Donnelly and G. Wong, “Entanglement branes, modular flow, and extended topological quantum field theory,”JHEP10(2019) 016,arXiv:1811.10785 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Entanglement branes and factorization in conformal field theory,

    L. Y. Hung and G. Wong, “Entanglement branes and factorization in conformal field theory,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 2, (2021) 026012,arXiv:1912.11201 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Minimal factorization of Chern-Simons theory – Gravitational anyonic edge modes,

    T. G. Mertens and Q.-F. Wu, “Minimal factorization of Chern-Simons theory – Gravitational anyonic edge modes,”SciPost Phys.20no. 4, (2026) 095,arXiv:2505.00501 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Combinatorial quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons theory. 2.,

    A. Y. Alekseev, H. Grosse, and V. Schomerus, “Combinatorial quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons theory. 2.,”Commun. Math. Phys.174(1995) 561–604,arXiv:hep-th/9408097

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  23. [23]

    Combinatorial quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons theory,

    A. Y. Alekseev, H. Grosse, and V. Schomerus, “Combinatorial quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons theory,”Commun. Math. Phys.172(1995) 317–358,arXiv:hep-th/9403066

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  24. [24]

    Black holes, q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills, and non-perturbative topological strings,

    M. Aganagic, H. Ooguri, N. Saulina, and C. Vafa, “Black holes, q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills, and non-perturbative topological strings,”Nucl. Phys.B715(2005) 304–348, arXiv:hep-th/0411280 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  25. [25]

    The Local Gromov-Witten theory of curves,

    J. Bryan and R. Pandharipande, “The Local Gromov-Witten theory of curves,”J. Am. Math. Soc.21(2008) 101–136,arXiv:math/0411037

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    Relative Gromov-Witten invariants,

    E.-N. Ionel and T. H. Parker, “Relative Gromov-Witten invariants,”Annals of Mathematics 157no. 1, (2003) 45–96.https://annals.math.princeton.edu/2003/157-1/p02. – 62 –

    2003

  27. [27]

    Two dimensional Yang-Mills, black holes and topological strings,

    C. Vafa, “Two dimensional Yang-Mills, black holes and topological strings,” arXiv:hep-th/0406058

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    The Topological Vertex,

    M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Mari˜ no, and C. Vafa, “The Topological Vertex,”Commun. Math. Phys.254(2005) 425–478,arXiv:hep-th/0305132

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  29. [29]

    D-branes and K-theory in 2D topological field theory,

    G. W. Moore and G. Segal, “D-branes and K-theory in 2D topological field theory,” arXiv:hep-th/0609042

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Entanglement branes, modular flow, and extended topological quantum field theory,

    W. Donnelly and G. Wong, “Entanglement branes, modular flow, and extended topological quantum field theory,”Journal of High Energy Physics2019no. 10, (Oct, 2019) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2019)016

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2019)016 2019

  31. [31]

    Topological strings and integrable hierarchies,

    M. Aganagic, R. Dijkgraaf, A. Klemm, M. Marino, and C. Vafa, “Topological strings and integrable hierarchies,”Commun. Math. Phys.261(2006) 451–516,arXiv:hep-th/0312085

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  32. [32]

    Ghost D-branes,

    T. Okuda and T. Takayanagi, “Ghost D-branes,”JHEP03(2006) 062,arXiv:hep-th/0601024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  33. [33]

    Brane / anti-brane systems and U(N—M) supergroup,

    C. Vafa, “Brane / anti-brane systems and U(N—M) supergroup,”arXiv:hep-th/0101218

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Entanglement in nonunitary quantum critical spin chains,

    R. Couvreur, J. L. Jacobsen, and H. Saleur, “Entanglement in nonunitary quantum critical spin chains,”Physical Review Letters119no. 4, (July, 2017) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.040601

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.040601 2017

  35. [35]

    Mari˜ no,Chern-Simons Theory, Matrix Models, and Topological Strings, vol

    M. Mari˜ no,Chern-Simons Theory, Matrix Models, and Topological Strings, vol. 131 of International Series of Monographs on Physics. Oxford University Press, 2005

    2005

  36. [36]

    D-branes on Calabi-Yau manifolds,

    P. S. Aspinwall, “D-branes on Calabi-Yau manifolds,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 2003): Recent Trends in String Theory, pp. 1–152. 3, 2004.arXiv:hep-th/0403166

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  37. [37]

    Remarks on the canonical quantization of the chern-simons-witten theory,

    S. Elitzur, G. Moore, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg, “Remarks on the canonical quantization of the chern-simons-witten theory,”Nuclear Physics B326no. 1, (1989) 108–134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321389904367

    arXiv 1989

  38. [38]

    Knot invariants and topological strings,

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “Knot invariants and topological strings,”Nucl. Phys.B577(2000) 419–438,arXiv:hep-th/9912123 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  39. [39]

    Non-perturbative corrections to entanglemetn entropy in topological string theory ,

    G. Wong, “Non-perturbative corrections to entanglemetn entropy in topological string theory ,” in preparation

  40. [40]

    Poisson structure on moduli of flat connections on Riemann surfaces and r matrix,

    V. V. Fock and A. A. Rosly, “Poisson structure on moduli of flat connections on Riemann surfaces and r matrix,”Am. Math. Soc. Transl.191(1999) 67–86,arXiv:math/9802054

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  41. [41]

    Large N expansion of q-deformed two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory and Hecke algebras,

    S. de Haro, S. Ramgoolam, and A. Torrielli, “Large N expansion of q-deformed two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory and Hecke algebras,”Commun. Math. Phys.273(2007) 317–355, arXiv:hep-th/0603056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  42. [42]

    A ribbon ZX calculus for gauge theory,

    G. Wong, R. A. Shaikh, and W. Donnelly, “A ribbon ZX calculus for gauge theory,” arXiv:2606.13551 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Entanglement branes in topological string theory,

    G. Wong, “Entanglement branes in topological string theory,”arXiv:2505.xxxx [hep-th]

  44. [44]

    Anyonic Entanglement and Topological Entanglement Entropy,

    P. Bonderson, C. Knapp, and K. Patel, “Anyonic Entanglement and Topological Entanglement Entropy,”Annals Phys.385(2017) 399–468,arXiv:1706.09420 [quant-ph]. – 63 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Anyonic Partial Transpose I: Quantum Information Aspects,

    H. Shapourian, R. S. K. Mong, and S. Ryu, “Anyonic Partial Transpose I: Quantum Information Aspects,”arXiv:2012.02222 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Operational Meaning of Entanglement Entropy in Anyonic Systems,

    K. Kato, F. Furrer, and M. Murao, “Operational Meaning of Entanglement Entropy in Anyonic Systems,”Phys. Rev. A90no. 6, (2014) 062325,arXiv:1310.4140 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    The Open/Closed Gromov-Witten/Hurwitz Correspondence and Localized World Sheets for Completed Cycles,

    J. Troost, “The Open/Closed Gromov-Witten/Hurwitz Correspondence and Localized World Sheets for Completed Cycles,”arXiv:2602.12786 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    Stringy ER = EPR,

    D. L. Jafferis and E. Schneider, “Stringy ER = EPR,”JHEP10(2022) 195, arXiv:2104.07233 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    A note on background independence in AdS 3 string theory,

    B. Knighton, “A note on background independence in AdS 3 string theory,”JHEP02(2025) 004,arXiv:2404.19571 [hep-th]. – 64 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025