Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

The Conformal Primon Gas at the End of Time

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read BKL gravity states near a singularity are shown to be conformal quantum mechanics states whose wavefunctions vanish at the nontrivial zeros of automorphic L-functions.

desk verdict A rich, mostly honest synthesis that deserves a serious referee, but the §4.5 overlap identity is off by an iε shift and must be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02661 v2 pith:4ITQSCNF submitted 2025-02-04 hep-th

Sean A. Hartnoll , Ming Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 11F6611F7211M2683C45
keywords BKLdynamicsconformalquantummechanicsautomorphicL-functionsMaaßwaveformsprimongasmodularinvarianceWheeler-DeWittquantizationnontrivialzeros
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the dynamics of gravity approaching a spacelike singularity, after the BKL reduction, is described at each spatial point by a single state in a conformal quantum mechanics, with the state constrained to be invariant under the modular group. The wavefunction of this state in a dilatation basis is proportional to an odd automorphic L-function along its critical line, so its zeros are exactly the nontrivial zeros. On the real axis the same L-function is the partition function of a non-interacting gas of charged oscillators labeled by primes, with imaginary chemical potentials fixed by modular invariance, generalizing the primon gas. If true, BKL dynamics, conformal quantum mechanics, automorphic L-functions, and a dual primon gas are four presentations of the same data, and the zeros of L-functions become nodes of gravitational wavefunctions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the odd automorphic L-function $L_k(s)$ attached to each odd Maaß cusp form, with the completed xi function $\xi_k(s)$ defined by multiplying by two gamma factors and obeying the reflection symmetry $\xi_k(s)=-\xi_k(1-s)$. The argument runs through three representations of one object: the bulk Maaß waveform $\Psi_k(x,y)$ on the hyperbolic plane, the boundary CQM state $|\psi\rangle$ in a principal-series representation of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$, and the L-function. In the dilatation basis the wavefunction is a ratio of gamma functions times $\xi(\tfrac12+it)$; in the position basis the coefficients $c_p=2\cos\theta_p$ of the L-function appear as Hecke eigenvalues; and on the real axis the Euler product of $L_k(s)$ is a sum over prime-labeled oscillators with imaginary chemical potentials. The duality between zeros and primes is the explicit formula, a Fourier-like sum over zeros equated with a sum over prime powers weighted by $\cos(n\theta_p)$, and averaging over the Kesten-McKay distribution of the $\theta_p$ smooths it into a sum rule.

What would settle it

Compute the lowest odd Maaß waveform numerically, construct the boundary CQM wavefunction through the near-boundary limit, Mellin transform it, and compare its zeros with the zeros of the corresponding L-function from a database: any mismatch of a single zero would break the claimed proportionality; alternatively, an inhomogeneous numerical-relativity simulation that shows spatial points do not decouple into the hard-wall Hamiltonian near the singularity would remove the gravitational input.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that each semiclassical BKL state, a solution of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation on half the modular fundamental domain, is an odd Maaß waveform, and this waveform is equivalently a state in a principal-series conformal quantum mechanics. Written in the basis of dilatation eigenstates, the state's wavefunction equals the completed L-function on the critical line, $\phi(t) \propto \xi(\tfrac12 + it)$, so the nontrivial zeros of the L-function are the zeros of the wavefunction. The same L-function, evaluated along the positive real axis, is the partition function of a gas of non-interacting charged harmonic oscillators, one for each prime, each with an imaginary chemical potential; modular invariance is what forces the specific phases of these chemical potentials. Averaging the logarithm of this partition function over the discrete set of states produces the Witten index of a fermionic primon gas with inverse temperature $2s+1$ and a $p^{-\frac12}$ degeneracy per prime.

Load-bearing premise

The weakest load-bearing premise is the BKL reduction itself: that full inhomogeneous Einstein gravity near a spacelike singularity decouples pointwise into the hard-wall billiard motion on half the modular fundamental domain, and that Wheeler-DeWitt quantization with the Laplacian ordering gives the correct semiclassical wavefunctions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the identification holds, the nontrivial zeros of each odd automorphic L-function are physical: they are the nodes of a boundary wavefunction of a conformal quantum mechanics state describing near-singularity gravity at one spatial point.
  • The conformal primon gas gives a statistical-mechanics avatar of each gravitational state: the partition function at inverse temperature $s$ is the L-function, so the primes become single-particle energies $\omega_p = \log p$ and the phases $\theta_p$ become imaginary chemical potentials.
  • Averaging over the discrete set of states yields a universal fermionic primon gas with inverse temperature $2s+1$; its thermodynamic divergence as $s\to 1/2$ gives a Hagedorn density of states $\rho(E) \propto e^{\frac12 E - \frac12 \log E}$.
  • The explicit formula relates two observables of the same state: the sum over zeros (spectrum of the dilatation operator) and the sum over prime powers (charges in the dual gas); averaging over chemical potentials produces a smooth sum rule $\lim_{x\to\infty} \langle \sum_n x^{it_n}\rangle_k = 1/2$.
  • The relation between zeros and Fourier coefficients is captured by the approximate functional equation, which locates zeros at $t\lesssim 100$ from only about fifteen Dirichlet coefficients.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper's picture is correct, the Riemann-zeta analog becomes a concrete construction: zeros of the L-function are eigenvalues of a dilatation operator in an explicitly unitary conformal quantum mechanics, and the primon gas provides a finite-temperature dual, moving beyond the older Hilbert-Pólya and Berry-Keating suggestions.
  • The paper's averaging over the Kesten-McKay distribution is formally parallel to averaging over CFT$_2$ data; one could test whether the dual primon gas obeys a modular bootstrap-like constraint that fixes the distribution of chemical potentials without invoking the Sato-Tate conjecture.
  • The many-body extension, tensoring over spatial points, suggests a non-interacting conformal quantum mechanics at the UV fixed point of the bulk dynamics; a natural test is whether the Hagedorn growth survives the tensor product or is washed out by interactions away from the strict BKL limit.
  • The adelic remarks in Section 7.1 hint at an adelic product formula for the full gravitational state; if pursued, this could connect the Archimedean CQM to p-adic holography in a way the paper does not attempt.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a triality between BKL-singularity wavefunctions, conformal quantum mechanics on half the modular fundamental domain, automorphic L-functions, and a dual 'conformal primon gas'. The central mathematical chain is: odd Maass cusp forms solve the Wheeler-DeWitt/BKL Hamiltonian constraint; viewed as CQM states their dilatation-basis wavefunctions are proportional to the completed L-function on the critical line, so the nontrivial zeros become nodes; along the real axis the L-function is claimed to be an overlap of the CQM state with a polylogarithmic probe state; and this same L-function is rewritten as the partition function of charged prime-labeled oscillators. Averaging over the Hecke angles with the Kesten-McKay distribution is then claimed to produce the Witten index of a fermionic primon gas. The gravitational interpretation is explicitly conditioned on the BKL decoupling regime, which the paper acknowledges as not yet established.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper gives a concrete physical realization of the Connes/Berry-Keating/Okazaki program in a setting where the L-function data are packaged as CQM wavefunctions, and it extends Julia's primon gas to a modular-invariant charged gas with a state/partition-function duality. The results are built on standard, internally consistent Mellin-transform mathematics and on the proven Kesten-McKay distribution rather than on a fit to the paper's target; the approximate functional equation in §5.1 is checked against LMFDB data, and the Euler-product-to-partition-function step is an exact rewriting. These are genuine strengths. The main caveat is that the physical application to gravitational singularities rests on the BKL reduction and on the Laplacian ordering in Eq. (5), as the authors themselves note in footnote 1; the mathematical core, however, stands independently of that reduction.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.5, Eq. (59)] The overlap identity is off by the iε shift introduced in Eq. (52). With a_n=n^{iε}c_n, the Fourier expansion of ψ_s(x) gives ⟨ψ_s|ψ⟩=Σ_n a_n/n^s=Σ_n c_n n^{iε}/n^s=L(s−iε), not L(s). This is not a convention choice, because the L-function in Eq. (15) is defined with the unshifted coefficients c_n. The real-axis L-function can still be obtained as an overlap, but only after redefining the probe state, for example ψ_s^ε(x)=2 Im Li_{s−iε}(e^{2πix}); the statements around Eqs. (60)–(62) and the interpretation leading into §6 must then be propagated consistently.
  2. [§6.2, Eq. (91)] The Kesten-McKay average is evaluated with the wrong coefficient. Using the measure (88), equivalently (97), one finds ∫ μ_p(x) log(1−xy+y²) dx = −(p−1)/2 log(1−y²/p), for example by expanding log(1−2cosθ y+y²) and using ∫ cos(2mθ)ν_p(θ)dθ = −(p−1)/(2p^m). Setting y=p^{−s}, Eq. (90) therefore gives ⟨log L_k(s)⟩_k = Σ_p (p−1)/2 log(1−p^{−(2s+1)}), not the printed Σ_p p^{−1/2} log(1−p^{−(2s+1)}). This is load-bearing: the printed coefficient makes the averaged free energy finite at s=1/2, whereas the text and Eqs. (96), (103)–(104) require a logarithmic divergence, and the corrected coefficient changes the claimed degeneracy of the fermionic oscillators in Eqs. (92)–(93) and (102)–(104) from p^{−1/2} to (p−1)/2. The identity and all downstream formulas and Fig. 5 need to be corrected consistently.
  3. [§2.1 and footnote 1] The physical interpretation is conditional on two unproved assumptions: the BKL decoupling of spatial points in fully inhomogeneous evolution, and the Laplacian ordering in the Wheeler-DeWitt constraint (5). Footnote 1 already flags the first of these. I do not treat this as an internal inconsistency, but the abstract and introduction currently state the BKL mapping as established fact. Please make the conditional status explicit there, since if the BKL reduction fails, the automorphic/CQM description is not tied to gravitational singularities even though the mathematics stands on its own.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] The word 'coeffcients' is misspelled.
  2. [Abstract and §4.3] The shorthand 'wavefunction proportional to the L-function along the critical axis' is imprecise: Eq. (53) gives φ(t) proportional to ξ(1/2+it) divided by gamma functions, not directly to L(1/2+it). The text should say 'up to gamma-function factors' at the first occurrence.
  3. [§4.5, Eq. (62)] After the probe state is redefined to fix the shift in Eq. (59), the overlap formula (62) should be recomputed; with the shifted polylogarithm the right-hand side will involve ζ(s+s′−iε−iε′), not ζ(s+s′).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central chain is a reorganization of external automorphic identities, with only a minor self-citation to [14] for ordering/norm convention.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a sequence of exact identities and external mathematical inputs rather than a self-referential loop. The L-function (14)-(16) is defined from standard Maass cusp-form Fourier coefficients c_n; the CQM boundary wavefunction psi(x) is then required to satisfy the T/S/oddness constraints, which fixes a_n = n^{i epsilon} c_n by comparing the resulting reflection condition with the xi-function functional equation (17)-(18), not by fitting to the target zeros. The dilatation-basis result phi(t) proportional to xi(1/2 + it) is the Mellin-transform identity (24) recast in CQM language; it is a reorganization of known identities, and the zeros enter through the externally defined xi. The real-axis overlap in Sec. 4.5 is intended as an identity, and the paper computes the polylog Fourier expansion (61) explicitly. (Separately, there is a non-circular normalization defect: with a_n = n^{i epsilon} c_n the overlap actually gives L(s - i epsilon), so Eq. (59) needs repair; this is an algebraic inconsistency, not a fit-to-target.) The primon gas of Sec. 6 is defined so that its traced partition function (78) equals the local Euler factor (15); this is an explicit dictionary, and the averaging step uses the external Kesten-McKay theorem (88), not the paper's own results, and is benchmarked against LMFDB data and Ref. [53]. Footnote 1 explicitly disclaims a proof of BKL decoupling, so the physical interpretation is conditional; that is an assumption, not circularity. The only self-citation of note is [14] (Hartnoll as coauthor) for the Laplacian ordering and DeWitt norm in Sec. 2.1; the paper presents those as choices/discussion points, and the automorphic identities stand independently of whether that ordering is 'most natural'. Hence no load-bearing circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims do not rest on any parameter fitted by the authors; the spectral parameter epsilon and the prime phases theta_p are data of the Maass form imported from the number theory literature and LMFDB. The physical relevance rests on the BKL hard-wall reduction and the chosen WDW ordering, and the mathematical interpretation rests on the Ramanujan and Riemann-hypothesis conjectures and on multiplicity one. The primon gases are formal dual systems, not claimed physical species; no independent evidence is provided.

free parameters (2)
  • Prime chemical potentials theta_p^(k) = Not fitted; from Hecke eigenvalues of each Maass form, using LMFDB data in the plots
    Parameterize c_p=2cos theta_p and enter the primon gas as imaginary chemical potentials. They are determined by modular invariance, not by fitting, but they are the parameters that distinguish different conformal primon gases.
  • Spectral parameter epsilon_k = Discrete spectrum from solving (5); e.g. epsilon approximately 9.53 in Fig. 4
    Labels the conformal weight Delta=1/2+i epsilon and the L-function. It is an eigenvalue, not an ad hoc parameter.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption BKL dynamics of full inhomogeneous Einstein gravity near a spacelike singularity reduce per spatial point to the hard-wall Hamiltonian (2) in half the modular fundamental domain.
    Section 2.1, Eq (2) and footnote 1 state the regime of validity is yet to be established; this is the physical bridge to automorphic forms.
  • domain assumption The Wheeler-DeWitt Hamiltonian constraint is ordered so that the mode equation is the Laplace operator (5) with eigenvalue 1/4+epsilon^2.
    Section 2.1 discusses the ordering ambiguity and chooses the natural Laplacian ordering that yields the Maass equation.
  • domain assumption The Hecke eigenvalues satisfy |c_p| <= 2, allowing c_p=2 cos theta_p with real theta_p.
    Section 2.2 after Eq (12) says 'we assume the Ramanujan conjecture'. Needed for the angle parameterization and the primon gas charge phases.
  • domain assumption All nontrivial zeros of the xi function xi_k lie on Re(s)=1/2, so the t_n are real.
    Section 3, Eq (19) says the zeros are 'believed only to have zeros along the critical line'; used in discussing the zero spectrum and explicit formulas.
  • domain assumption There is a unique automorphic form at a given energy level epsilon.
    Section 4.3 states this without proof or citation; it is used to force a_n=n^(i epsilon) c_n and to identify the CQM wavefunction with a specific L-function.
invented entities (2)
  • Charged prime-labeled bosonic oscillators (conformal primon gas)
    purpose: Provide a statistical-mechanical dual whose partition function equals the automorphic L-function along the real axis.
    Section 6.1, Eqs (78)-(87). The oscillators are a mathematically defined auxiliary system, not a proposed physical species; no independent experimental handle.
  • Fermionic primon gas with p^(-1/2) degeneracy
    purpose: Interpret the averaged logarithm of L_k as a Witten index.
    Section 6.2, Eq (93), and Section 6.3. The degeneracy p^(-1/2) is non-integer for p=2, signaled by the authors, indicating a formal rewriting rather than a physical spectrum.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Conformal Primon Gas at the End of Time." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4ITQSCNF

@misc{pith2026250202661,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Conformal Primon Gas at the End of Time},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4ITQSCNF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02661}
}
abstract

The Belinksy-Khalatnikov-Lifshitz dynamics of gravity close to a spacelike singularity can be mapped, at each point in space separately, onto the motion of a particle bouncing within half the fundamental domain of the modular group. We show that the semiclassical quantisation of this motion is a conformal quantum mechanics where the states are constrained to be modular invariant. Each such state defines an odd automorphic $L$-function. In particular, in a basis of dilatation eigenstates the wavefunction is proportional to the $L$-function along the critical axis and hence vanishes at the nontrivial zeros. We show that the $L$-function along the positive real axis is equal to the partition function of a gas of non-interacting charged oscillators labeled by prime numbers. This generalises Julia's notion of a primon gas. Each state therefore has a corresponding, dual, primon gas with a distinct nontrivial set of chemical potentials that ensure modular invariance. We extract universal features of these theories by averaging the logarithm of the partition function over the chemical potentials. The averaging produces the Witten index of a fermionic primon gas.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02661 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: schematic evolution of a local volume element in the BKL regime. The shape [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of an automorphic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: The bulk waveform vanishes along SL(2, Z) domain boundaries, shown as lines in the figure. These accumulate towards the conformal boundary of the hyperbolic plane at y = 0, such that the boundary wavefunction ψ(x) vanishes at all rational numbers. See the discussion in [49, 50]. Right: relationship between various representations of the state. In the bulk, the Maaß waveform is first defined as Ψ(x, y). Writing… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The function Z(t) for the lowest energy odd Maaß waveform, with ε ≈ 9.53, computed using the approximate functional equation (69) and numerical cn coefficients from the database https://www.lmfdb.org/. We have excluded low values of t from the plot, as the approximatio…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Thin blue lines: Several odd conformal primon gas partition functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The first five plots show the locations p cos 2θ k p  , p sin 2θ k p  corresponding to the first 168 prime Dirichlet coefficients of the L-functions shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions for 5d BKL dynamics, automorphic L-functions and complex primon gases

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Near-singularity Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions for 5d BKL dynamics are shown to correspond to Hecke L-functions over Gaussian or Eisenstein integers, whose Euler products define complex 'primon gas' partition functions.

  2. York time in JT gravity

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In JT gravity, the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction satisfies a Schrodinger equation in York time with a Hermitian squeezing Hamiltonian, and York time evolution is a unitary change of the length basis rather than physical...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    V. A. Belinsky, I. M. Khalatnikov and E. M. Lifshitz, Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativistic cosmology, Adv. Phys.19, 525–573, 1970

    1970

  2. [2]

    Damour, M

    T. Damour, M. Henneaux and H. Nicolai, Cosmological billiards, Class. Quant. Grav.20, R145–R200, 2003, [arXiv:hep-th/0212256]

    arXiv 2003

  3. [3]

    Kleinschmidt and H

    A. Kleinschmidt and H. Nicolai, Cosmological quantum billiards, inFoundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity, pp. 106–124, 2009. [arXiv:0912.0854 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Kleinschmidt, M

    A. Kleinschmidt, M. Koehn and H. Nicolai, Supersymmetric quantum cosmological billiards, Phys. Rev. D80, 061701, 2009, [arXiv:0907.3048 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Belinski and M

    V. Belinski and M. Henneaux,The Cosmological Singularity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. CUP, 2017, 10.1017/9781107239333

    doi:10.1017/9781107239333 2017

  6. [6]

    Kleinschmidt and H

    A. Kleinschmidt and H. Nicolai, The E10 Wheeler-DeWitt operator at low levels, JHEP 04, 092, 2022, [arXiv:2202.12676 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Graham, Chaos and quantum chaos in cosmological models, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 5, 1103–1122, 1995

    R. Graham, Chaos and quantum chaos in cosmological models, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 5, 1103–1122, 1995

    1995

  8. [8]

    E. B. Bogomolny, B. Georgeot, M. J. Giannoni and C. Schmit, Arithmetical chaos, Phys. Rept.291, 219–324, 1997

    1997

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Sarnak, Arithmetic quantum chaos, Blythe Lectures, https://publications.ias.edu/node/527, 1993

    P. Sarnak, Arithmetic quantum chaos, Blythe Lectures, https://publications.ias.edu/node/527, 1993

    1993

  2. [10]

    P. Sarnak, Statistical properties of eigenvalues of the hecke operators, inAnalytic Number Theory and Diophantine Problems: Proceedings of a Conference at Oklahoma State University, 1984(A. C. Adolphson, J. B. Conrey, A. Ghosh and R. I. Yager, eds.), (https://doi.org/10.1007/9...

    1984 doi

  3. [11]

    Steil, Eigenvalues of the Laplacian and of the Hecke operators forP SL(2,Z), 1994, [https://lib-extopc.kek.jp/preprints/PDF/1994/9405/9405055.pdf]

    G. Steil, Eigenvalues of the Laplacian and of the Hecke operators forP SL(2,Z), 1994, [https://lib-extopc.kek.jp/preprints/PDF/1994/9405/9405055.pdf]

    1994

  4. [12]

    Rudnick, Zeta functions in arithmetic and their spectral statistics, Lectures at DMV Summer School,http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~rudnick/papers/ihp.ps, 2000

    Z. Rudnick, Zeta functions in arithmetic and their spectral statistics, Lectures at DMV Summer School,http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~rudnick/papers/ihp.ps, 2000

    2000

  5. [13]

    Chamon, R

    C. Chamon, R. Jackiw, S.-Y. Pi and L. Santos, Conformal quantum mechanics as the CFT1 dual to AdS2, Phys. Lett. B701, 503–507, 2011, [arXiv:1106.0726 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    De Clerck, S

    M. De Clerck, S. A. Hartnoll and J. E. Santos, Mixmaster chaos in an AdS black hole interior, JHEP07, 202, 2024, [arXiv:2312.11622 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M. V. Berry and J. P. Keating, The riemann zeros and eigenvalue asymptotics, SIAM Review41, 236–266, 1999. 32

    1999

  8. [16]

    Connes, Trace formula in noncommutative geometry and the zeros of the riemann zeta function, Selecta Mathematica5, 29, 1999

    A. Connes, Trace formula in noncommutative geometry and the zeros of the riemann zeta function, Selecta Mathematica5, 29, 1999

    1999

  9. [17]

    M. V. Berry and J. P. Keating, H=xp and the Riemann Zeros, inSupersymmetry and Trace Formulae: Chaos and Disorder(I. V. Lerner, J. P. Keating and D. E. Khmelnitskii, eds.), (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4875-1_19), pp. 355–367, Springer US, 1999

    doi

  10. [18]

    Okazaki, Whittaker vector, Wheeler-DeWitt equation, and the gravity dual of conformal quantum mechanics, Phys

    T. Okazaki, Whittaker vector, Wheeler-DeWitt equation, and the gravity dual of conformal quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D92, 126010, 2015, [arXiv:1510.04759 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Julia, Statistical theory of numbers, inNumber Theory and Physics: Proceedings of the Winter School, Les Houches, France, March 7–16, 1989, pp

    B. Julia, Statistical theory of numbers, inNumber Theory and Physics: Proceedings of the Winter School, Les Houches, France, March 7–16, 1989, pp. 276–293. Springer, 1990

    1989

  12. [20]

    T. H. Hansson, M. Hermanns, S. H. Simon and S. F. Viefers, Quantum Hall physics: Hierarchies and conformal field theory techniques, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025005, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence, JHEP10, 034, 2001, [arXiv:hep-th/0106113]

    A. Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence, JHEP10, 034, 2001, [arXiv:hep-th/0106113]

    2001 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. M. Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP05, 013, 2003, [arXiv:astro-ph/0210603]

    2003 arXiv

  15. [23]

    S. A. Hartnoll, Wheeler-DeWitt states of the AdS-Schwarzschild interior, JHEP01, 066, 2023, [arXiv:2208.04348 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Araujo-Regado, R

    G. Araujo-Regado, R. Khan and A. C. Wall, Cauchy slice holography: a new AdS/CFT dictionary, JHEP03, 026, 2023, [arXiv:2204.00591 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Collier, A

    S. Collier, A. Maloney, H. Maxfield and I. Tsiares, Universal dynamics of heavy operators in CFT2, JHEP07, 074, 2020, [arXiv:1912.00222 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer, Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 164001, 2021, [arXiv:2006.05499 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman and A. Maloney, Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs, JHEP12, 069, 2022, [arXiv:2203.06511 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231–252, 1998, [arXiv:hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Garfinkle and F

    D. Garfinkle and F. Pretorius, Spike behavior in the approach to spacetime singularities, Phys. Rev. D102, 124067, 2020, [arXiv:2010.01399 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Fournodavlos, I

    G. Fournodavlos, I. Rodnianski and J. Speck, Stable big bang formation for einstein’s equations: The complete sub-critical regime, J. Am. Math. Soc.36, 827–916, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Fournodavlos and J

    G. Fournodavlos and J. Luk, Asymptotically Kasner-like singularities, Am. J. Math.145, 1183–1272, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Li, BKL bounces outside homogeneity: Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field in surface symmetry, 2024, [arXiv:2408.12434 [gr-qc]]

    W. Li, BKL bounces outside homogeneity: Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field in surface symmetry, 2024, [arXiv:2408.12434 [gr-qc]]. 33

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. 1. The Canonical Theory, Phys. Rev.160, 1113–1148, 1967

    1967

  26. [34]

    Graham and P

    R. Graham and P. Szepfalusy, Quantum creation of a generic universe, Phys. Rev. D42, 2483–2490, 1990

    1990

  27. [35]

    C. W. Misner, Mixmaster universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.22, 1071–1074, 1969

    1969

  28. [36]

    D. A. Hejhal, Eigenvalues of the Laplacian forP SL(2,Z): Some New Results and Computational Techniques,International Symposium in Memory of Hua Loo Keng: Volume I Number Theory, eds. S. Gong, Q-K. Lu, Y. Wang and L. Yang, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 59–102, 1991

    1991

  29. [37]

    Csordás, R

    A. Csordás, R. Graham and P. Szépfalusy, Level statistics of a noncompact cosmological billiard, Phys. Rev. A44, 1491–1499, 1991

    1991

  30. [38]

    Bolte, G

    J. Bolte, G. Steil and F. Steiner, Arithmetical chaos and violation of universality in energy level statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2188–2191, 1992

    1992

  31. [39]

    D. A. Hejhal and S. Arno, On Fourier coefficients of Maass waveforms forP SL(2,Z), Math. Comp.61, 245–267, 1993

    1993

  32. [40]

    D. A. Hejhal and B. N. Rackner, On the topography of Maass waveforms forPSL(2,Z), Experimental Mathematics1, 275 – 305, 1992

    1992

  33. [41]

    M. V. Berry, Regular and irregular semiclassical wavefunctions, J. Phys. A: Mathematical and General10, 2083, 1977

    1977

  34. [42]

    J. L. Hafner, Some remarks on odd maass wave forms (and a correction to [1]), Mathematische Zeitschrift196, 129–132, 1987

    1987

  35. [43]

    Epstein, J

    C. Epstein, J. L. Hafner and P. Sarnak, Zeros ofL-functions attached to Maass forms, Mathematische Zeitschrift190, 113–128, 1985

    1985

  36. [44]

    Rudnick and P

    Z. Rudnick and P. Sarnak, Zeros of principalL-functions and random matrix theory, http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1077245671, Duke Math. J.85, 269–322, 1996

    1996

  37. [45]

    de Boer and S

    J. de Boer and S. N. Solodukhin, A Holographic reduction of Minkowski space-time, Nucl. Phys. B665, 545–593, 2003, [arXiv:hep-th/0303006]

    2003 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Knapp and P

    A. Knapp and P. Trapa, Representations of semisimple lie groups, Representation theory of Lie groups (Park City UT, 1998; eds.: Adams, J. et al.). IAS/Park City Math. Ser8, 5–87, 2000,https://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~aknapp/pdf-files/parkcity.pdf

    1998

  39. [47]

    Anous and J

    T. Anous and J. Skulte, An invitation to the principal series, SciPost Phys.9, 028, 2020, [arXiv:2007.04975 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Spradlin and A

    M. Spradlin and A. Strominger, Vacuum states for AdS(2) black holes, JHEP11, 021, 1999, [arXiv:hep-th/9904143]. 34

    1999 arXiv

  41. [49]

    W. Schmid, Automorphic distributions forSL(2, R), inProceedings of the Conférence Moshé Flato 1999: Quantization, Deformations, and Symmetries, Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000

    1999

  42. [50]

    S. D. Miller and W. Schmid, The Highly Oscillatory Behavior of Automorphic Distributions forSL(2), Lett. Math. Phys.69, 265–286, 2004

    2004

  43. [51]

    J. B. Conrey, Notes onL-functions and random matrix theory, Frontiers Num. Theor., Phys., and Geom. I 107–162, 2006,https://aimath.org/~kaur/publications/58.pdf

    2006

  44. [52]

    M. V. Berry, Riemann’s zeta function: A model for quantum chaos?, inQuantum Chaos and Statistical Nuclear Physics(T. H. Seligman and H. Nishioka, eds.), (https: //michaelberryphysics.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/berry154.pdf), pp. 1–17, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1986

    2013

  45. [53]

    A. R. Booker and H. Then, Rapid computation of l-functions attached to maass forms, Int. J. Num. Theor.14, 1459–1485, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    Bakas and M

    I. Bakas and M. J. Bowick, Curiosities of arithmetic gases, J. Math. Phys.32, 1881–1884, 1991

    1991

  47. [55]

    Spector, Supersymmetry and the Möbius inversion function, Commun

    D. Spector, Supersymmetry and the Möbius inversion function, Commun. Math. Phys. 127, 239–252, 1990

    1990

  48. [56]

    S. S. Gubser, J. Knaute, S. Parikh, A. Samberg and P. Witaszczyk,p-adic AdS/CFT, Commun. Math. Phys.352, 1019–1059, 2017, [arXiv:1605.01061 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  49. [57]

    S. S. Gubser, Ap-adic version of AdS/CFT, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21, 1655–1678, 2017, [arXiv:1705.00373 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Huang, B

    A. Huang, B. Stoica, S.-T. Yau and X. Zhong, Green’s functions for Vladimirov derivatives and Tate’s thesis, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.15, 315–361, 2021, [arXiv:2001.01721 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Lewis and D

    J. Lewis and D. Zagier, Period Functions for Maass Wave Forms. I, Ann. Math.153, 191–258, 2001,http://www.jstor.org/stable/2661374

    2001

  52. [60]

    Chakravarty, Overcounting of interior excitations: A resolution to the bags of gold paradox in AdS, JHEP02, 027, 2021, [arXiv:2010.03575 [hep-th]]

    J. Chakravarty, Overcounting of interior excitations: A resolution to the bags of gold paradox in AdS, JHEP02, 027, 2021, [arXiv:2010.03575 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. M. Magan and M. Sasieta, Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. X14, 011024, 2024, [arXiv:2212.02447 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Witten, A note on the canonical formalism for gravity, Adv

    E. Witten, A note on the canonical formalism for gravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27, 311–380, 2023, [arXiv:2212.08270 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Benjamin, S

    N. Benjamin, S. Collier, A. L. Fitzpatrick, A. Maloney and E. Perlmutter, Harmonic analysis of 2d CFT partition functions, JHEP09, 174, 2021, [arXiv:2107.10744 [hep-th]]. 35

    2021 arXiv

  56. [64]

    F. M. Haehl, C. Marteau, W. Reeves and M. Rozali, Symmetries and spectral statistics in chaotic conformal field theories, JHEP07, 196, 2023, [arXiv:2302.14482 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Di Ubaldo and E

    G. Di Ubaldo and E. Perlmutter, AdS3/RMT2 duality, JHEP12, 179, 2023, [arXiv:2307.03707 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    F. M. Haehl, W. Reeves and M. Rozali, Symmetries and spectral statistics in chaotic conformal field theories II: Maass cusp forms and arithmetic chaos, 2023, [arXiv:2309.00611 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Godet, Quantum cosmology as automorphic dynamics, 2024, [arXiv:2405.09833 [hep-th]]

    V. Godet, Quantum cosmology as automorphic dynamics, 2024, [arXiv:2405.09833 [hep-th]]. 36

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.