Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Pole-Expansion of Two-Hadron Imaginary-Time Correlation Function -a new method of analysis for unstable states in lattice QCD-

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two-hadron correlation functions are sums of pole terms; resonance masses and widths become direct fit parameters

desk verdict A clearly written method proposal that connects pole expansion in the uniformization variable to Euclidean correlators; the main claim is undercut by an unjustified drop of the Mittag-Leffler entire function and an unaddressed finite-volume gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02878 v1 pith:4NXMFXZB submitted 2025-05-05 hep-lat nucl-th

Wren Yamada , Osamu Morimatsu , Toru Sato , Koichi Yazaki This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-latnucl-th PACS 12.38.Gc13.75.Lb
keywords latticeQCDimaginary-timecorrelationfunctionMittag-Lefflerexpansionuniformizationvariablehadronresonancescoupled-channelscatteringrhomesonLambda(1405)
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a two-hadron imaginary-time correlation function $C(\tau)$, of the kind lattice QCD computes, can be represented as a Mittag-Leffler sum over pole terms once the underlying propagator is written in a uniformization variable that makes it single-valued. On this representation, the correlator is parametrized only by the positions and residues of the poles, so fitting lattice data would directly give the complex energies (masses and widths) of unstable states such as the $\rho$ meson and $\Lambda(1405)$, along with couplings. The authors verify the expansion numerically in two phenomenological models, the vector-dominance model for $\rho$ and the chiral unitary model for $\Lambda(1405)$, and find that the pole sum reproduces the full correlator essentially exactly. If right, this offers a simpler route to resonance parameters from Euclidean correlation functions than multi-step finite-volume analyses.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is uniformization: for one channel $u = k = \tfrac{1}{2}\sqrt{p_0^2 - p^2 - \varepsilon^2}$, and for two channels $u = z = (k_1 + k_2)/\Delta$, where $k_i$ are the channel momenta. This variable is chosen so that the threshold branch cuts open and the propagator $D(p_0)$ becomes a single-valued meromorphic function of $u$, allowing the Mittag-Leffler theorem to represent $D(u)$ as a sum of simple pole pairs of the form $(u-u_n)^{-1}$ and $(u+u_n^*)^{-1}$. Substituting this sum into the integral defining $C(\tau)$ turns the correlator into a sum of known functions $C(\tau,u_n)$ weighted by residues, so no continuum subtraction or intermediate $K$-matrix parametrization is needed.

What would settle it

Compute the full two-hadron correlation function on a given lattice ensemble, fit it with the pole expansion using a few poles, and compare residuals at short imaginary time: a systematic short-distance deviation, or a fitted pole position that moves with lattice volume or external momentum q, would show that the pole-only parametrization is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the imaginary-time correlation function $C_{ij}(\tau)$, defined by a Laplace transform of the discontinuity of $D_{ij}(p_0)$, can be written as $C_{ij}(\tau) = \operatorname{Disc}\sum_n [r_{ij}^n C(\tau,u_n) - r_{ji}^{n*} C(\tau,-u_n^*)]$, where $u$ is the uniformization variable and $C(\tau,u_n)$ is a known integral. The authors derive this form from the Mittag-Leffler theorem under a meromorphy assumption, explicitly separate dynamical poles ($\rho$, $\Lambda(1405)$) from kinematical poles (noninteracting $\pi\pi$, $\bar{K}N$, $\pi\Sigma$ pairs), and demonstrate numerically that the sum over just a few poles reproduces both $D$ and $C$ over the plotted range. They conclude that the pole expansion holds for single-channel and coupled-channel (two-channel) scatterings, and they propose it as a method to extract masses and widths of unstable states from lattice QCD correlation functions.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation rests on the correlation function being meromorphic in the uniformization variable after left-hand cuts and three-or-more-body channels are neglected; if real correlation functions have those cuts, or if finite-volume lattice data do not obey an infinite-volume pole sum, the proposed fit would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Lattice QCD analyses of resonances could fit $C(\tau)$ directly with a handful of pole terms, extracting $m - i\Gamma/2$ from pole positions without an intermediate finite-volume energy spectrum.
  • The same parametrization applies to coupled-channel systems, so the several poles of $\Lambda(1405)$ could be separated from each other and from noninteracting two-hadron contributions.
  • Large relative momentum between the two hadrons lowers the dynamical pole energy relative to the kinematical pair pole, so such kinematics sharpen the resonance signal in $C(\tau)$.
  • Pole residues carry coupling information: in the $\rho$ case they encode the scattering volume and reproduce the known long-time behavior of the three-point correlation function.
  • The expansion gives a built-in consistency check: fitted pole positions should not depend on the external momentum $q$ or on which correlation-function component is fitted.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the meromorphy assumption survives finite-volume checks, the pole-sum fit could replace multi-step analyses for unstable states, reducing model dependence in lattice determinations of widths.
  • Editorial inference: the same uniformized pole expansion might extend to three-hadron thresholds if a suitable uniformization variable can be constructed, though the paper explicitly leaves three-body channels out.
  • Editorial inference: a direct numerical test on synthetic lattice correlators generated from a known scattering amplitude could settle whether a few-pole fit recovers the input mass and width at finite volume; the authors themselves flag this as the next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes representing the two-hadron imaginary-time correlation function C(τ) in lattice QCD as a sum of pole terms in a uniformization variable. The authors start from the spectral representation of C(τ), introduce a uniformization variable u that makes the two-hadron propagator single-valued, and invoke the Mittag-Leffler theorem to write D(u) as a sum over pole terms. They derive explicit expressions for the single-channel rho-meson case and the two-channel Lambda(1405) case, and they demonstrate the pole expansion in the vector-dominance model and the chiral unitary model, respectively. On this basis, they propose the pole expansion as a new fitting method to extract masses and widths of unstable states from lattice QCD correlation functions. The main claims are that C(τ) is parametrized only by pole positions and residues and that the pole expansion holds for both single-channel and coupled-channel scatterings.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper offers an attractive new route to resonance parameters from Euclidean correlation functions, potentially complementing the Luscher and HAL QCD methods. The uniformization-variable framework is well motivated, and the model comparisons are a useful sanity check. The paper is clearly written and the phenomenological demonstrations are instructive. The significance is presently limited, however, because the derivation relies on an unproven meromorphy assumption, the entire-function term of the Mittag-Leffler expansion is dropped without justification, and the model tests do not exercise the physics that could invalidate the expansion, such as left-hand cuts or finite-volume effects. The paper is honest about the finite-volume issue at the end, but the title and abstract present the method as ready for lattice QCD use.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (4)] The Mittag-Leffler expansion of a meromorphic function D(u) is, in general, the sum of principal parts plus an entire function E(u). Eq. (4) omits E(u) entirely, but the paper gives no argument that E(u)=0 or that its contribution to the imaginary-time correlator is negligible. Because u(p0) has square-root branch points at thresholds, even an entire E(u) produces a nonzero discontinuity across the physical cut when composed with u(p0), so E contributes to C(τ) through Eq. (1). Thus the statement that C(τ) is 'parametrized only by the pole positions and residues' is not established. The model demonstrations in Sections 3 and 4 cannot settle this point, since the model amplitudes are pole-dominated by construction. I ask the authors to justify the omission of the entire function, or to show explicitly how it is absorbed or controlled.
  2. [Sections 3 and 4, Eqs. (18) and (23)] The demonstrations in the vector-dominance and chiral-unitary models do not test the key assumption that left-hand cuts and three-or-more-body channels can be neglected. In these toy models, the propagators are built from s-channel pole terms plus free two-particle propagation, so the agreement between the direct calculation and the pole sum is essentially a consistency check. To make the central claim convincing, the paper would need a model or a general argument in which left-hand cuts from t- and u-channel exchanges are present and are shown to be representable or negligible in the uniformization variable. A quantitative estimate of the neglected left-hand-cut contribution in a physically motivated model would be a natural addition.
  3. [Final paragraph, 'There is one thing which should be clarified'] The proposed application is to lattice QCD, where correlation functions are computed in a finite volume and have discrete spectra. The spectral representation in Eq. (1) and the pole expansion in Eq. (4) are infinite-volume statements. The authors acknowledge this at the end and say the finite-volume question should be clarified, but the abstract and title already present the method as a tool for lattice QCD analysis. This gap is load-bearing for the claimed application. The paper would be acceptable either with a finite-volume formulation of the pole expansion or with an explicit statement that the lattice application is conditional on future work on finite-volume effects.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Equation (5)] Equation (5) as written places the symbol 'Disc' outside the sum and then defines C(τ,u_n) by an integral over p0, which makes the notation ambiguous. Presumably the discontinuity is to be taken on D(u(p0)) before the integration; the formula should be rewritten to make this clear.
  2. [Section 4, Figs. 7 and 8] The two-channel demonstration is shown only for one matrix element, D_{Kbar N, πΣ}, and the agreement is judged visually. A quantitative measure, such as a pointwise relative difference between the direct calculation and the pole-sum result, would strengthen the claim that the expansion 'holds' in the coupled-channel case.
  3. [Section 3, text near Eq. (17)] The statement that the scattering volume v is 'related to the residues of the poles together with the pole position' is correct, but the step from Eq. (16) to Eq. (17) would benefit from a brief derivation, since the reader must otherwise infer that Im[k^2 D_{ππρ}]/Re[k^2 D_{ππρ}] is being evaluated in the k→0 limit.
  4. [Figures 1 and 6] The red lines indicating the 'physical region' are not defined in the captions. Adding a sentence explaining that this line corresponds to the physical p0 values mapped into the k or z plane would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (4)-(5) are a direct Mittag-Leffler consequence under an explicitly stated meromorphy assumption; the model comparisons are independent checks, and the remaining gaps are validity assumptions rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: assume meromorphy of D(u) after uniformization (explicitly stated), apply the Mittag-Leffler theorem to write D as a sum of pole terms, then substitute into the spectral representation to obtain C(tau). This is a direct mathematical consequence and does not define an output in terms of a fitted input. The numerical demonstrations compare the pole-sum form against separately computed model correlators (vector-dominance and chiral-unitary), not against pole parameters obtained by fitting C(tau), so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction. The paper does cite the authors' prior works [20-23] for the method and uses Ref. [21] for calculational details, which is self-citation, but it is not load-bearing here because the pole-expansion formulas and the comparisons are presented in this paper. The principal limitations (the dropped entire function in Eq. (4), neglected left-hand cuts and three-body channels, and the conceded finite-volume question) are assumptions or validity gaps for the proposed lattice-QCD application, not circular reductions. No quoted equality reduces to itself by construction, so no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the meromorphy assumption and the neglect of left-hand cuts and three-body channels. The model parameters are inputs from prior phenomenological work and are not fitted in this paper; they serve only to demonstrate the expansion. No new particles or entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • m_pi = 0.140 GeV = 0.140 GeV
    Pion mass used in the vector dominance demonstration, taken from Ref. [31].
  • m_rho = 0.760 GeV, Gamma_rho = 0.160 GeV = 0.760 GeV, 0.160 GeV
    Rho meson mass and width in the demonstration model, taken from Ref. [31].
  • g = 6.05 = 6.05
    Vector dominance coupling constant in the demonstration, taken from Ref. [31].
  • f = 0.104 GeV = 0.104 GeV
    Chiral unitary model pion decay constant, taken from Refs. [32-35].
  • C matrix for chiral unitary model = [[3, -sqrt(3/2)], [-sqrt(3/2), 4]]
    Coupling matrix in the chiral unitary model, taken from Ref. [21].
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Neglect of left-hand cuts and three-or-more-body channels
    Stated in the introduction as a prerequisite for the correlation function to be meromorphic in the uniformization variable. This restricts the applicability of the pole expansion.
  • domain assumption D(p0) is a meromorphic function of the uniformization variable u
    Central assumption that allows the Mittag-Leffler expansion in Eq. (4). Not proven for QCD correlation functions; the paper labels it as an assumption.
  • standard math Mittag-Leffler theorem for meromorphic functions
    Used to justify expanding D(u) as a sum over poles with residues, as in Eq. (4).
  • standard math Spectral representation C(τ) = ∫ e^{-p0 τ} Disc D(p0)
    Standard Kallen-Lehmann type spectral representation used as the starting point in Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption P and CP symmetry impose relations between residues
    Used to simplify D_pi_pi_rho equals D_rho_pi_pi and related residue relations, stated in the single-channel section.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pole-Expansion of Two-Hadron Imaginary-Time Correlation Function -a new method of analysis for unstable states in lattice QCD-." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4NXMFXZB

@misc{pith2026250502878,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pole-Expansion of Two-Hadron Imaginary-Time Correlation Function -a new method of analysis for unstable states in lattice QCD-},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4NXMFXZB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02878}
}
abstract

We analyze the pole expansion of the two-hadron imaginary-time correlation function. We first explain the general idea that the imaginary-time correlation function is expressed as a sum of the pole terms, the Mittag-Leffler expansion, in terms of the uniformization variable, which makes the S-matrix single-valued. We then derive explicit expressions of the pole expansion for the single-channel ($\rho$ meson) and two-channel ($\Lambda(1405)$) examples and demonstrate that the pole expansion actually holds employing phenomenological models, the vector-dominance model for the $\rho$ meson and the chiral unitary model for $\Lambda(1405)$. From this observation we propose the pole expansion as a method to extract information of unstable states such as masses and widths from the two-hadron imaginary-time correlation functions obtained by lattice QCD simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02878 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Pole positions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dependence of pole contribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Pole positions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, and R. D. Young, Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025001 (2018), arXiv:1706.06223 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    In terms of the uniformization variable, u, Dij(u) can be expressed as a sum of the pole terms, the Mittag-Leffler expansion [27, 28], as Dij(u) = X n rij n u−un − rji∗ n u +u∗ n

    are masses of hadrons in the channel 1 (2): u =z = k1 +k2 ∆ = 1 2 (p2 0− p2−ε2 1)1/2 + (p2 0− p2−ε2 2)1/2 ∆ , (3) where ∆ = 1 2 p ε2 2−ε2 1 [25, 26]. In terms of the uniformization variable, u, Dij(u) can be expressed as a sum of the pole terms, the Mittag-Leffler expansion [27, 28], as Dij(u) = X n rij n u−un − rji∗ n u +u∗ n . (4) Substituting Eq.(4) in...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Aoki et al

    S. Aoki et al. (CP-PACS), Lattice QCD Calculation of the rho Meson Decay Width, Phys. Rev. D 76, 094506 (2007), arXiv:0708.3705 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2007

  4. [4]

    X. Feng, K. Jansen, and D. B. Renner, Resonance Parameters of the rho-Meson from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 83, 094505 (2011), arXiv:1011.5288 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Aoki et al

    S. Aoki et al. (CS), ρ Meson Decay in 2+1 Flavor Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 84, 094505 (2011), arXiv:1106.5365 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    C. B. Lang, D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek, and M. Vidmar, Coupled channel analysis of the rho meson decay in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 84, 054503 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 89, 059903 (2014)], arXiv:1105.5636 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and C. E. Thomas (Hadron Spectrum), Energy dependence of the ρ resonance in ππ elastic scattering from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034505 (2013), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 099902 (2014)], arXiv:1212.0830 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Alexandrou, L

    C. Alexandrou, L. Leskovec, S. Meinel, J. Negele, S. Paul, M. Petschlies, A. Pochinsky, G. Ren- don, and S. Syritsyn,P -waveππ scattering and theρ resonance from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034525 (2017), arXiv:1704.05439 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Andersen, J

    C. Andersen, J. Bulava, B. H¨ orz, and C. Morningstar, The I = 1 pion-pion scattering am- plitude and timelike pion form factor from Nf = 2 + 1 lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 939, 145 (2019), arXiv:1808.05007 [hep-lat]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    D. J. Wilson, R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and C. E. Thomas, Coupled ππ,K ¯K scattering in P -wave and theρ resonance from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094502 (2015), arXiv:1507.02599 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and D. J. Wilson (Hadron Spectrum), An a0 resonance in strongly coupled πη, KK scattering from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094506 (2016), arXiv:1602.05122 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson (Hadron Spectrum), Resonances in coupledπK−ηK scattering from quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 182001 (2014), arXiv:1406.4158 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bulava et al

    J. Bulava et al. (Baryon Scattering (BaSc)), Two-Pole Nature of the Λ(1405) resonance from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 051901 (2024), arXiv:2307.10413 [hep-lat]

    2024

  6. [14]

    Bulava et al

    J. Bulava et al. (Baryon Scattering (BaSc)), Lattice QCD study of πΣ-K¯N scattering and the Λ(1405) resonance, Phys. Rev. D 109, 014511 (2024), arXiv:2307.13471 [hep-lat]

    2024

  7. [15]

    G. Moir, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson, Coupled-Channel Dπ, Dη and Ds ¯K Scattering from Lattice QCD, JHEP 10, 011, arXiv:1607.07093 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  8. [17]

    Stable Particle States, Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 177 (1986)

    1986

  9. [18]

    Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

  10. [19]

    Scattering States, Commun. Math. Phys. 105, 153 (1986)

    1986

  11. [20]

    Rummukainen and S

    K. Rummukainen and S. A. Gottlieb, Resonance scattering phase shifts on a nonrest frame lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 450, 397 (1995), arXiv:hep-lat/9503028

    1995 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Ishii, S

    N. Ishii, S. Aoki, and T. Hatsuda, The Nuclear Force from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 022001 (2007), arXiv:nucl-th/0611096

    2007 arXiv

  13. [22]

    S. Aoki, T. Hatsuda, and N. Ishii, Theoretical Foundation of the Nuclear Force in QCD and its applications to Central and Tensor Forces in Quenched Lattice QCD Simulations, Prog. Theor. Phys. 123, 89 (2010), arXiv:0909.5585 [hep-lat]

    2010 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Humblet and L

    J. Humblet and L. Rosenfeld, Theory of nuclear reactions: I. resonant states and collision matrix, Nuclear Physics 26, 529 (1961)

    1961

  15. [24]

    Yamada and O

    W. Yamada and O. Morimatsu, New method to extract information of near-threshold reso- nances: Uniformized Mittag-Leffler expansion of Green’s function and T matrix, Phys. Rev. C 102, 055201 (2020), arXiv:2005.07022 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [25]

    W. A. Yamada, O. Morimatsu, T. Sato, and K. Yazaki, Near-threshold spectrum from a uniformized Mittag-Leffler expansion: Pole structure of the Z(3900), Phys. Rev. D105, 014034 (2022), arXiv:2108.11605 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [26]

    W. A. Yamada, O. Morimatsu, T. Sato, and K. Yazaki, Survival probability of unstable states in coupled-channels: Nonexponential decay of threshold cusp, Phys. Rev. D 108, L071502 (2023), arXiv:2305.11695 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [27]

    R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles (Springer, 1982)

    1982

  19. [28]

    R. G. Newton, Inelastic scattering, Annals of Physics 4, 29 (1958)

    1958

  20. [29]

    Kato, Analytical properties of two-channel S-matrix, Annals Phys

    M. Kato, Analytical properties of two-channel S-matrix, Annals Phys. 31, 130 (1965)

    1965

  21. [30]

    Arfken, H

    G. Arfken, H. Weber, and F. Harris,Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide (Elsevier Science, 2013)

    2013

  22. [31]

    E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson,A Course of Modern Analysis: an Introduction to the General Theory of Infinite Processes and of Analytic Functions; with an Account of the Principal Transcendental Functions (University Press, 1928)

    1928

  23. [32]

    Maiani and M

    L. Maiani and M. Testa, Final state interactions from Euclidean correlation functions, Phys. Lett. B 245, 585 (1990)

    1990

  24. [33]

    J. J. Sakurai, Theory of strong interactions, Annals Phys. 11, 1 (1960)

    1960

  25. [34]

    Klingl, N

    F. Klingl, N. Kaiser, and W. Weise, Effective Lagrangian approach to vector mesons, their structure and decays, Z. Phys. A 356, 193 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9607431

    1996 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Kaiser, T

    N. Kaiser, T. Waas, and W. Weise, SU(3) chiral dynamics with coupled channels: Eta and kaon photoproduction, Nucl. Phys. A 612, 297 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9607459

    1997 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Oset and A

    E. Oset and A. Ramos, Nonperturbative chiral approach to s wave anti-K N interactions, Nucl. Phys. A 635, 99 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9711022

    1998 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Hyodo and D

    T. Hyodo and D. Jido, The nature of the Lambda(1405) resonance in chiral dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 55 (2012), arXiv:1104.4474 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Morimatsu and K

    O. Morimatsu and K. Yamada, Renormalization of the unitarized Weinberg-Tomozawa inter- action without on-shell factorization and I=0 K ¯N–πΣ coupled channels, Phys. Rev. C 100, 025201 (2019), arXiv:1903.12380 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.