REVIEW 4 cited by
Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine unlearning -- efficiently removing the effect of a small "forget set" of training data on a pre-trained machine learning model -- has recently attracted significant research interest. Despite this interest, however, recent work shows that existing machine unlearning techniques do not hold up to thorough evaluation in non-convex settings. In this work, we introduce a new machine unlearning technique that exhibits strong empirical performance even in such challenging settings. Our starting point is the perspective that the goal of unlearning is to produce a model whose outputs are statistically indistinguishable from those of a model re-trained on all but the forget set. This perspective naturally suggests a reduction from the unlearning problem to that of data attribution, where the goal is to predict the effect of changing the training set on a model's outputs. Thus motivated, we propose the following meta-algorithm, which we call Datamodel Matching (DMM): given a trained model, we (a) use data attribution to predict the output of the model if it were re-trained on all but the forget set points; then (b) fine-tune the pre-trained model to match these predicted outputs. In a simple convex setting, we show how this approach provably outperforms a variety of iterative unlearning algorithms. Empirically, we use a combination of existing evaluations and a new metric based on the KL-divergence to show that even in non-convex settings, DMM achieves strong unlearning performance relative to existing algorithms. An added benefit of DMM is that it is a meta-algorithm, in the sense that future advances in data attribution translate directly into better unlearning algorithms, pointing to a clear direction for future progress in unlearning.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
De-attribute to Forget for LLM Unlearning
DareU unlearns LLMs by PPO-optimizing attribution rewards so outputs are no longer attributable to forget owners, outperforming loss-based methods on forget-utility trade-offs.
-
OriginBlame: Record- and Token-Level Data Provenance for AI Training Datasets
A record- and token-level provenance system that turns author revocation requests into precise forget sets, cutting dataset-level over-deletion from 101x to 1.3x on wiki data.
-
Invisible Watermarks, Visible Gains: Steering Machine Unlearning with Bi-Level Watermarking Design
Water4MU tunes an invisible watermark on data so that machine unlearning algorithms can remove requested images more effectively, beating prior methods on 'challenging forgets'.
-
Investigating the Feasibility of Mitigating Potential Copyright Infringement via Large Language Model Unlearning
SSU combines task-vector negation, random-label loss, and weight saliency to forget copyrighted books sequentially while retaining more general language ability than existing baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.