Model for the commensurate charge-density waves in under-hole-doped cuprate superconductors

Jacob Morrissey; Richard A. Klemm; Timothy J.Haugan

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Model for the commensurate charge-density waves in under-hole-doped cuprate superconductors

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the strong interlayer-coupling limit, an N-layer stack of CuO2 planes behaves as a single layer with coupling NJ, stabilizing commensurate charge-density waves in bilayer and trilayer cuprates.

desk verdict Careful finite-lattice calculation of the J'→∞ limit, but the physical claims for cuprates rest on a singular limit with no finite-J' support, plus an unaddressed sign issue in the Hamiltonian. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13322 v2 pith:4R37LLMK submitted 2025-01-23 cond-mat.supr-con

Jacob Morrissey , Timothy J.Haugan , Richard A. Klemm This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-con

keywords commensuratecharge-densitywavepseudogapcupratesuperconductorsmultilayerIsingmodelBi2212Bi2223terahertzemissionorderparametersymmetry

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that the pseudogap observed above the superconducting transition in underdoped bismuth-based cuprates is a commensurate charge-density wave (CCDW): within each CuO2 plane, alternating oxygen sites carry excess charges $\pm\delta e$, forming a pattern below a temperature $T_p$ but above $T_c$. It models this order with an $N$-layer Ising model on a square lattice, with repulsive intralayer coupling $J$ and interlayer coupling $J'$ between neighboring oxygen sites. The central result is that, for finite $L\times M\times N$ sections, the partition function in the $J'\to\pm\infty$ limit reduces exactly to that of a single $L\times M$ layer with $J$ replaced by $NJ$. Two- and three-layer compounds therefore behave like monolayers with doubled or tripled coupling, which stabilizes the CCDW and raises its ordering temperature. If this picture is correct, the nodal 'd-wave-looking' features in pseudogap measurements are charge-order features rather than superconducting pairing signatures, and the strong terahertz emission from underdoped Bi2212 mesas follows from the rigidity of the commensurate pattern.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $N$-layer Ising partition function $Z_{LMN}(K,K')$ on an $L\times M\times N$ lattice of oxygen-site charge deviations $\sigma_{i,j,k}=\pm1$, with $K=J/k_BT$ and $K'=J'/k_BT$. The mechanism is a strong-coupling reduction: for $K'\to\pm\infty$, the interlayer bonds force $\sigma_{i,j,1}=\cdots=\sigma_{i,j,N}$ in every column, so the intralayer couplings of the $N$ layers add, and the partition function ratio $Z_{LMN}(K,K')/[Z_{112}(K')]^{LM}$ tends to $Z_{LM1}(NK)/2^{LM}$. This 'effective single layer with coupling $NJ$' identity carries the stabilization argument: it converts a multilayer charge-order problem into the single-layer 2D Ising problem at $N$ times the monolayer coupling.

What would settle it

Compare the onset temperature of the commensurate charge order in Bi2201, Bi2212, and Bi2223 at matched hole doping: the model predicts a systematic rise with layer number, governed by the effective coupling $NJ$ in the strong-coupling limit; if the onset does not rise with $N$, or rises far less than the $N$-fold enhancement, the central claim is falsified. A second check is to measure or compute $J'/J$ from the oxygen-oxygen distances and screening: if $J'/J$ is not large compared with 1, the strong-coupling identity is not the governing regime for these materials.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that multilayer stacking multiplies the effective intralayer coupling by the number of layers. For an Ising model on an $L\times M\times N$ lattice with couplings $K=J/k_BT$ and $K'=J'/k_BT$, the $J'\to\pm\infty$ limit locks each column of $N$ spins into a single configuration, so the intralayer bonds of all $N$ layers contribute coherently. Explicit finite-lattice evaluations for $N=2$ and $N=3$ give $Z_{LMN}(K,K')/[Z_{112}(K')]^{LM}\to Z_{LM1}(NK)/2^{LM}$, i.e. an effective monolayer with coupling $NJ$. The paper states this reduction as the mechanism by which the CCDW is enhanced and stabilized in Bi2212 and Bi2223 relative to monolayer Bi2201, and uses it to argue that the pseudogap's $d_{x^2-y^2}$-shaped nodal pattern is a charge-order property. It further claims this accounts for the enhanced THz emission from underdoped Bi2212 mesas and for experiments that were interpreted as evidence for a $d_{x^2-y^2}$ superconducting order parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The stabilization argument is derived in the $J'\to\infty$ limit with $J$ held fixed, but real Bi2212 and Bi2223 have interlayer and intralayer oxygen-oxygen spacings that differ only modestly, so $J'/J$ is of order unity; the paper does not provide a finite-$J'$ calculation showing that the effective coupling $NJ$ and the enhanced stabilization survive at realistic coupling ratios.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Bilayer Bi2212 and trilayer Bi2223 should exhibit commensurate charge order that is substantially more stable than in monolayer Bi2201, with effective intralayer couplings $2J$ and $3J$, respectively.
The nodal, V-shaped density of states that defines the pseudogap should be understood as the CCDW's $d_{x^2-y^2}$-symmetric charge pattern, not as evidence for a $d_{x^2-y^2}$ superconducting gap.
Narrow-linewidth terahertz emission from underdoped Bi2212 mesas is consistent with a pinned commensurate charge order that cannot drift and disrupt synchronized Josephson emission, unlike an incommensurate CDW.
Phase-sensitive experiments that report a $d_{x^2-y^2}$-looking pattern in Bi2212 need re-examination: if they probe the CCDW's nodal pattern, they constrain the charge order rather than the superconducting order parameter.
In the $J'\to\infty$ limit, the charge-order transition of an $N$-layer stack is the 2D Ising transition at coupling $NJ$, so the ordering temperature should rise with layer number when interlayer coupling dominates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the dimensional reduction persists at finite $J'$, the model predicts a monotonic rise of the CCDW onset temperature with layer number even at realistic coupling ratios; comparing Bi2201, Bi2212, and Bi2223 at matched hole doping would test this directly.
The model's rigid-lattice, classical-charge description omits lattice fluctuations and quenched disorder; a testable consequence is that the sharpest CCDW onset and the largest THz emission enhancement should occur in the most stoichiometric underdoped samples.
Because $J'$ is set by the interlayer oxygen spacing $d'$, c-axis pressure or strain should tune the CCDW stabilization: reducing $d'$ raises $J'$ and should move the charge-order onset upward.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does one clean thing: it shows by explicit finite-lattice partition function evaluations that for L×M×N Ising sections with interlayer coupling J'→∞, the partition function reduces to that of a single layer with J replaced by NJ. The Mathematica results look internally consistent, and the reduction is what one expects from the standard dimensional-reduction property of layered Ising models. That part is solid, as far as it goes. The supplement gives reproducible formulas, which is real evidence.

The problems start when the paper moves from that limit to the cuprates. The stabilization argument requires J'/J→∞, but the paper's own Eq. (7) gives J'/J = d/d', a ratio of order unity for Bi2212 and Bi2223. No finite-J' calculation, estimate, or perturbative argument is provided. The stress-test note has this right: the N-fold enhancement is not established for the materials discussed. The abstract's language ('therefore strongly enhanced and stabilized') overstates what the math supports.

Second, the Hamiltonian as written is ferromagnetic (H = -JΣσσ with J,J'>0). Its ground state is uniform spin alignment, not the alternating ±δe pattern of Fig. 13. The authors say the minus sign accounts for the opposite charge deviations, but a repulsive Coulomb interaction between like deviations would require +JΣσσ. On a bipartite lattice a sublattice gauge transformation maps one to the other, but the paper never makes that mapping explicit, so the claimed ground-state interpretation is muddled. This is fixable—state that the physical charges are staggered spins—but as written it is a genuine inconsistency.

Third, the connections to THz emission and to the d-wave experiments are asserted, not derived. The logic is conditional ('likely accounting for'), and those sections read more like a research program than a result.

To the paper's credit, it is transparent about what it proves: only the J'→∞ limit for finite sections, with no general proof for arbitrary L,M,N. The finite-lattice formulas are reproducible, and the paper does not hide the limitation.

Who is this for? Someone asking whether multilayer coupling can raise CDW ordering temperatures. The paper gives a clear Yes in the singular limit, and an Unproven for real materials. The question is legitimate and the math, though narrow, appears correct. I would send it to a serious referee, but the referee should demand (i) a fix or explicit gauge treatment of the Hamiltonian sign, (ii) finite-J' results or a scaling argument for why order-unity J'/J is enough, and (iii) a substantial toning down of the claims about THz and d-wave. Without those, reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an N-layer Ising model on the oxygen sublattice of the CuO2 planes as a description of the commensurate charge-density wave (CCDW) in underdoped Bi2201 (N=1), Bi2212 (N=2), and Bi2223 (N=3). The Hamiltonian in Eqs. (4)-(6) has near-neighbor intralayer and interlayer couplings J and J' with J,J'>0. The central result, established by finite-size partition-function evaluations in the Supplementary Material, is that in the K'→±∞ limit the ratio Z_LMN(K,K')/[Z_112(K')]^{LM} reduces to Z_LM1(NK)/2^{LM}, so the N-layer system behaves as a single-layer Ising model with coupling NJ. From this the authors conclude that multilayer stacking strongly stabilizes the CCDW and offer this as an explanation of enhanced THz emission from Bi2212 mesas and of experiments that have been interpreted as evidence for d_{x^2-y^2}-wave superconductivity.

Significance. The partition-function reduction is a clean and internally consistent result: the finite-size checks for strips and small two-dimensional sections are reproducible with the stated methods, no parameters are fitted to data, and the reduction is a parameter-free statement about the Hamiltonian as written. If it applied at realistic couplings, the argument would give a simple mechanism for multilayer enhancement of charge order. However, the model's physical identification is currently incorrect (ferromagnetic ground state versus the claimed alternating charge pattern), and the enhancement is proven only in the singular J'/J→∞ limit, whereas the paper's own Coulomb parameterization gives J'/J of order unity for Bi2212 and Bi2223. The interpretive claims about THz emission and the superconducting order-parameter symmetry go beyond what is derived.

major comments (3)

[§V, Eqs. (4)-(7) and Figs. 13-16] The Hamiltonian in Eqs. (4)-(6) with J, J' > 0 has negative signs, so it is the ferromagnetic Ising model: a bond with σ_i = σ_j contributes −J, while a bond with σ_i = −σ_j contributes +J. Its ground state is therefore uniform (all σ equal), whereas the CCDW described in the text and in Figs. 13-16 is an alternating checkerboard of ±δe charges with zero net charge. The passage after Eq. (7) stating that the negative signs incorporate the Coulomb preference for opposite charge deviations is backwards for this Hamiltonian; the intended physics requires the opposite sign convention (H ∝ +J Σ σσ). On the bipartite square lattice the partition functions of the two conventions are equal under a staggered gauge transformation, so the reduction result may survive, but the manuscript as written misidentifies the model's ground state and its relationship to the physical CCDW, and this must be corrected explicitly.
[§V and Supplementary §I] The reduction to an effective single layer with coupling NJ is derived and verified only in the K'→±∞ limit at fixed K, equivalently J'/J→∞, a limitation the Supplementary Material itself states after Eq. (22) ('we can only take the limit K'→∞, which is equivalent to the J'/J→∞ limit'). The paper's own parameterization in Eq. (7) gives J'/J = d/d', which is of order unity for Bi2212 and Bi2223 even if d' < d as asserted. No finite-J' computation, estimate, or perturbation argument is supplied, so the claims in the abstract that the CCDW is 'strongly enhanced and stabilized' in the multilayer compounds and that the coupling becomes NJ are unsupported extrapolations from a singular limit. To make the central claim load-bearing for real materials, the authors need to provide finite-J' results (for example transfer-matrix, Monte Carlo, or mean-field calculations of the bilayer and trilayer Ising model at physical J'/J, including the resulting ordering temperature), or restrict the conclusions explicitly to the singular limit.
[Abstract and §IV] The abstract and Section IV attribute the enhanced THz emission from Bi2212 mesas and the d_{x^2-y^2}-wave interpretation of many phase-sensitive experiments to the CCDW stabilization described by the model. These statements are not derived in the manuscript: there is no calculation connecting the Ising partition function to Josephson emission linewidths or powers, and no calculation showing that a static checkerboard charge pattern would produce the interference signatures (tricrystal rings, SQUIDs, twist junctions) attributed to d-wave pairing. These are interpretive assertions that should either be substantiated by explicit calculations or removed from the abstract and conclusions, or clearly labeled as speculation.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] The manuscript contains several typos and misspellings, including 'It has has long been known' (Section I), 'In ths model' (Section V), and 'easly found' (Supplementary Eq. (1)); these should be corrected in a revision.
[Ref. [40] footnote] The footnote to Ref. [40] recounts a private conversation at a conference and is not appropriate material for a reference footnote; it should be removed or replaced with a neutral statement about the published work.
[Supplementary closing paragraph] The closing paragraph of the Supplementary Material contains two unresolved citation placeholders ('[?]') for the statements about the YBCO gap anisotropy, and these need to be supplied.
[Abstract] The abstract calls J and J' 'repulsive interactions,' but with the negative signs in Eqs. (4)-(6) they are ferromagnetic couplings in the spin language; the terminology should be reconciled with the corrected sign convention.
[Figs. 13 and 14] The claim that the checkerboard charge pattern has d_{x^2-y^2} symmetry is asserted without a derivation; the precise relation between the real-space pattern in Fig. 13 and the polar form in Fig. 14 should be defined explicitly, since it supports the discussion in Section IV.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the N-layer reduction is a self-contained finite-lattice calculation; self-citations are background, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central result is an exact algebraic reduction of the partition function in the K'→±∞ limit. The paper starts from an explicit Ising Hamiltonian (Eqs. 4-6), defines K and K' (Eq. 9), and evaluates ratios Z_LMN/(Z_112)^LM for finite L,M,N; the limiting identities Z_LM2(...)→Z_LM1(2K)/2^LM and Z_LM3(...)→Z_LM1(3K)/2^LM are direct calculations, not fits. No experimental data are used to determine parameters; J and J' are geometric Coulomb estimates (Eq. 7), and the limit is an assumption rather than something fitted to data. The d-wave identification is a labeling of the checkerboard pattern, and the interpretive statements about THz emission and prior twist experiments are post-hoc narrative, not inputs to the calculation. Many references are to the corresponding author's prior work, but the load-bearing partition-function identities are derived in the paper and in the Supplementary Material using Mathematica for finite systems, so the self-citations do not carry the argument. The principal caveat, that the stabilization is shown only for J'/J→∞ while real materials have finite J'/J, is a validity/robustness concern, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's conclusions rest on the assumption that the pseudogap is a commensurate CDW, that nearest-neighbor Coulomb interactions on a square oxygen lattice capture the physics, and that the infinite interlayer coupling limit is representative of real materials. The sign convention in the Hamiltonian is inconsistent with the stated repulsive interaction and with the claimed alternating ground state. No free parameters are fitted to data.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The underdoped pseudogap state in Bi2201, Bi2212, and Bi2223 is a commensurate charge-density wave on the oxygen sites.
Stated in Section IV: 'we assume that the CDWs that can be somewhat useful are the CCDWs' and 'the most likely insulating states are assumed to be CDWs.'
domain assumption Only nearest-neighbor intralayer and interlayer Coulomb interactions between oxygen charge deviations are relevant.
The Hamiltonian in Eqs. (4)-(6) includes only nearest-neighbor bonds, neglecting longer-range Coulomb interactions and coupling to the copper sites.
ad hoc to paper The J'→∞ (infinite interlayer coupling) limit captures the behaviors of real multilayer cuprates.
The main partition function reduction is derived only in this limit (Supplementary Eq. (15)), and no finite-J' calculations or estimates of J'/J are provided.
ad hoc to paper The Ising model partition function with the sign as written (ferromagnetic) represents the CCDW.
The paper uses H = -J Σ σσ with J>0, which gives a ferromagnetic ground state, contrary to the alternating-charge pattern described in the text and Fig. 13.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Model for the commensurate charge-density waves in under-hole-doped cuprate superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4R37LLMK

@misc{pith2026250113322,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Model for the commensurate charge-density waves in under-hole-doped cuprate superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4R37LLMK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13322}
}

abstract

A simple model of the commensurate charge-density wave (CCDW) portion of the underdoped pseudogap regions of monolayer Bi$_2$Sr$_{2-x}$La$_x$CuO$_{6-x}$ (Bi2201), bilayer Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+\delta}$ (Bi2212), and trilayer Bi$_2$Sr$_2$Ca$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{10+\delta}$ (Bi2223) cuprate superconductors is presented and studied. Above the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ but below the pseudogap transition temperature $T_p > T_c$, the CCDW forms on the oxygen sites in the CuO$_2$ layers with excess charges of $\pm\delta e$, where $e$ is the electronic charge, forming on alternating oxygen sites. This model is equivalent to $N$-layer versions of the two-dimensional Ising model for spins on a square lattice with repulsive interactions $J' , J>0$ between near-neighbor inter- and intralayer sites, respectively. For strong coupling, we show analytically for sections of $L\times M\times N$ sites that the partition function in the $J'\rightarrow\pm \infty$ limits reduces to that for an effective single layer with $L\times M$ sites and $J$ replaced by $NJ$. The CCDW is therefore strongly enhanced and stabilized by multilayer structures, likely accounting for the enhanced THz emission observed from the intrinsic Josephson junctions in underdoped Bi2212 mesas and for the many experiments on Bi2212 and related compounds purporting to provide evidence for a superconducting order parameter with $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13322 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Superconducting gap of Bi2212 measured by STM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Superconducting gap of Bi2212 covered with a mono [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (10 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. The density of states of the electron-doped cuprate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Phase diagram of Bi2212 from the Tsinghua group [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Low-temperature data for 45 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Frequency dependence of the emission from a stan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Plotted are the logarithms of the pseudogap hump [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. Plotted are the resistance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_12.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14. Sketch of the symmetry of a “conventional” [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_14.png]

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: FIG. 15. Sketch of the ground state of the oxygen sites in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_15.png]

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: FIG. 16. Sketch of the ground state of the oxygen sites in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

[1]

R. A. Klemm, Layered Superconductors, Vol. I (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2012)

work page 2012
[2]

R. A. Klemm, Striking similarities between the pseu- dogap phenomena in cuprates and in layered organic and dichalcogenide superconductors, Physica C 341.348, 839.842 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0921-4534(00)00708-5

work page doi:10.1016/s0921-4534(00)00708-5 2000
[3]

R. A. Klemm, Pristine and intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide superconductors, Physica C 514, 86 (2015)

work page 2015
[4]

J. A. Wilson, F. J. DiSalvo, and S. Mahajan, Charge- density waves and superlattices in the metallic transi- tion metal dichalcogenides, Adv. Phys. 24 (2), 117-201 (1975). doi. 10.1080/00018737500101391

doi:10.1080/00018737500101391 1975
[5]

J. P. Tidman, O. Singh, D.E. Curzon, and R. F. Frindt, The phase transition in 2 H-TaS2 at 75 K, Phil. Mag. 30, 1191-1194 (1974)

work page 1974
[6]

W. C. Tonjes, V. A. Greanya, R. Liu, C. G. Olson, and P. Molini´ e, Charge-density-wave mechanism in the 2H-NbSe2 family: Angle-resolved photoemission studies, Phys. Rev. B 63, 235101 (2001)

work page 2001
[7]

F. R. Gamble, F. J. DiSalvo, R. A. Klemm, and T. H. Geballe, Superconductivity in layered structure organometallic crystals, Science 168, 568 (1970)

work page 1970
[8]

A. H. Thompson, F. R. Gamble, and R. F. Koehler, Ef- fects of intercalation on electron transport in tantalum disulﬁde, Phys. Rev. B 5(8), 2811 (1972)

work page 1972

Show all 56 references

[9]

R. A. Klemm, Fluctuation-induced conductivity in lay- ered superconductors, J. Low Temp. Phys. 16, 381 (1972)

1972
[10]

R. A. Klemm, M. R. Beasley, and A. Luther, Fluctuation- induced diamagnetism un dirty three-dimensional, two- dimensional, and layered superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 8, 5072 (1973)

1973
[11]

D. A. Wollman, D. J. Van Harlingen, W. C. Lee, D. M. Ginsberg, and A. J. Leggett, Experimental determination of the superconducting pairing state in YBCO from the phase coherence of YBCO-Pb dc SQUIDs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2134 (1993)

1993
[12]

C. C. Tsuei, J. A. Kirtley, C. C. Chi, S. S. Yu-Jahnes, A. Gupta, T. Shaw, J. Z. Sun, and M. B. Ketchen, Pairing symmetry and ﬂux quantization in a tricrystal supercon- ducting ring of YBa 2Cu3O7−δ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 593 (1994)

1994
[13]

C. C. Tsuei and J. A. Kirtley, Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 969-1016 (2000)

2000
[14]

R. A. Klemm, C. T. Rieck, and K. Scharnberg, Angu- lar dependence of the Josephson critical current in c- axis twist junctions of high temperature superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 58 (2), 1051 (1998)

1998
[15]

R. A. Klemm, G. Arnold, C. T. Rieck, and K. Scharn- berg, Coherent vs. incoherent c-axis Josephson tunneling between layered superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 58 (21), 14203 (1998)

1998
[16]

Q. Li, Y. N. Tsay, M. Suenaga, R. A. Klemm, G. D. Gu, and Y. Koshizuka, Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Bicrystal c- axis twist Josephson junctions: A new phase-sensitive test of order parameter symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (20), 4160 (1999)

1999
[17]

R. A. Klemm, C. T. Rieck, and K. Scharnberg, Order parameter symmetries in high temperature superconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. B 61 (9), 5913 (2000)

2000
[18]

Bille, R

A. Bille, R. A. Klemm, and K. Scharnberg, Models of c-axis twist Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 64 (17), 174507 (2001)

2001
[19]

Takano, T

Y. Takano, T. Hatano, A. Ishii, A. Fukuyo, Y. Sato, S. Arisawa, and K. Togano, Fabrication of Bi2212 cross- whiskers junction, Physica C 362, 261-264 (2001)

2001
[20]

Takano, T

Y. Takano, T. Hatano, A. Fukuyo, A. Ishii, M. Ohmori, S. Arisawa, K. Togano, and M. Tachiki, d-like Symmetry of the order parameter and intrinsic Josephson eﬀects in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ cross-whisker junctions, Phys. Rev. B 65, 140513 (2002)

2002
[21]

Takano, T

Y. Takano, T. Hatano, M. Ohmori, S. Kawakami, A. Ishii, S. Arisawa, S.-J. Kim, T. Yamashita, K. Togano, and M. Tachiki, Cross-whisker intrinsic Josephson junc- tion as a probe of the superconducting order parameter, J. Low Temp. Phys. 131, 533-537 (2003)

2003
[22]

Takano, T

Y. Takano, T. Hatano, A. Fukuyo, M. Ohmori, P. Ah- met, T. Naruke, K. Nakajima, T. Chikyow, A. Ishii, S. Arisawa, K. Togano, and M. Tachiki, Angular depen- dence of critical current and intrinsic Josephson eﬀects in Bi-2212 cross-whisker junctions, Sing. J. Phys. 18, 67 (2002)

2002
[23]

R. A. Klemm, Theory of Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ cross-whisker Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 67, 174509 (2002)

2002
[24]

Yu. I. Latyshev, A. P. Orlov, A. M. Nikitina, P. Monceau, and R. A. Klemm, The c-axis transport in naturally- grown Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ cross-whisker junctions, Phys. Rev. B 70, 094517 (2004)

2004
[25]

R. A. Klemm, The phase-sensitive c-axis twist experi- ments on Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ and their implications, Phil. Mag. 85, 801-853 (2005)

2005
[26]

S. A. Kivelson and B. Spivak, Macroscopic character of composite high-temperature superconducting wires, Phys. Rev. B 92, 184502 (2015)

2015
[27]

B. W. Hoogenboom, K. Kadowaki, B. Revaz, and Ø. Fis- cher, Homogeneous samples of Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ , Phys- ica C 391, 376-380 (2003)

2003
[28]

Zhong, Y

Y. Zhong, Y. Wang, S. Han, Y.-R. Lv, W.-L. Wang, D. Zhang, H. Ding, Y.-M. Zhang, L. Wang, K. He, R. Zhong, H A. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, C.-L. Song, X.-C. Ma, and Q. K. Xue, Nodeless pairing in superconducting copper- oxide monolayer ﬁlms on Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ , Sci. Bull. 61, 1239 (2016)

2016
[29]

Bardeen, L

J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieﬀer, Theory of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 108, 175 (1957)

1957
[30]

Mahan, Condensed Matter in a Nutshell (Princeton University Press, 2011)

G.D. Mahan, Condensed Matter in a Nutshell (Princeton University Press, 2011)

2011
[31]

Scharnberg and R

K. Scharnberg and R. A. Klemm, P -wave superconduc- tors in magnetic ﬁelds, Phys. Rev. B 22, 5233 (1980 )

1980
[32]

Scharnberg and R

K. Scharnberg and R. A. Klemm, Upper critical ﬁeld in p- wave superconductors with broken symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2445 (1985)

1985
[33]

Y. He, M. Hashimoto, D. Song, S.-D. Chen, J. He, I. M. Vishik, B. Moritz, D.-H. Lee, N. Nagaosa, J. Zaa- nen, T. P. Devereaux, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, D. H. Lu, and Z.-X. Shen, Rapid change of superconductivity and electron-phonon coupling through critical doping in Bi- 2212, S...

2018
[34]

Fan, X.-Q

J.-Q. Fan, X.-Q. Yu, F. J. Cheng, H. Wang, R. Wang, X. Ma, X.-P. Hu, D. Zhang, X.-C. Ma, Q.-K. Xue, and 10 C.-L. Song, Direct observation of nodeless superconduc- tivity and phonon modes in electron-doped copper oxide Sr1−xNdxCuO2, Nat. Sci. Rev. 9, nwab225 (2022). doi: 10.109...

2022 doi
[35]

Markini, Y

M. Markini, Y. Lee, T. Confalone, S. Shokrin, C. N. Sagaru, D. Wolf, G. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Montemurro, V. M. Vinokour, K. Nielsch, and N. Poc- cia, Twisted cuprate van der Waals heterostructures with controlled Josephson coupling, Mat. Today 67, 106-112 (2023]

2023
[36]

Y. Zhu, M. Liao, Q. Zhang, H.-Y. Xie, F. Meng, Y. Liu, Z. Bai, S. Ji, J. Zhang, K. Jiang, R. Zhong, J. Schnee- loch, G. Gu, L. Gu, X. Ma, D. Zhang, and Q.-K. Xue, Presence of s-wave pairing in Josephson junctions made of twisted ultrathin Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+x ﬂakes, Phys. Rev. X 1...

2021
[37]

Y. Zhu, H. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Hu, G. Gu, J. Zhu, D. Zhang, and Q.-K. Xue, Persistent Josephson tunneling between Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ ﬂakes twisted by 45 ◦ across the superconducting dome, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174508 (2023)

2023
[38]

J. Lee, W. Lee, G. Y. Kim, V. B. Choi, J. Park, S. Jang, G. Gu, S. Y. Choi, G. Y. Cho, G. H. Lee, and H. J. Lee, Twisted van der Waals Josephson junction based on a high- Tc superconductor, Nano Lett. 21 (21), 10469- 10477 (2021)

2021
[39]

pseudo- gap

Reprinted with permission from Y. Zhu, H. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Hu, G. Gu, J. Zhu, D. Zhang, and Q.-K. Xue, Per- sistent Josephson tunneling between Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ ﬂakes twisted by 45 ◦ across the superconducting dome, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174508 (2023). [37] 5 FIG. 8. Low-temperat...

2023
[40]

S. Y. F. Zhao, X. Cui, P. A. Volkov, H. Yoo, S.Lee, J. A. Gardener, A. J. Akey, R. Engelke, Y. Ronen, R. Zhong, G. Gu, S. Plugge, T. Tummuru, M. Franz, J. H. Pixley, N. Poccia, and P. Kim, Time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity between twisted cuprate superconductor...

2023 doi
[41]

We note that all overdoped samples studied to date have excess oxygen in their grain boundaries

When the senior author of [39] was asked by the corre- sponding author of this manuscript at the 13th Interna- tional Conference on the Intrinsic Josephson Eﬀect and High Temperature Superconductivity in Glasgow, Scot- land, August 30-September 1, 2023 why he didn’t show any d...

2023
[42]

H. Wang, Y. Zhu, Z. Bai, Z. Wang, S. Hu, H.-Y. Xie, X. Hu, J. Cui, M. Huong, J. Chen, Y. Ding, L. Zhao, X. Li, Q. Zhang, L. Gu, X. J. Zhou, J. Zhu, D. Zhang, and Q.- K. Xue, Prominent Josephson tunneling between twisted single copper oxide planes of Bi 2Sr2−xLaxCuO6+y, Nat. Co...

2023 doi
[43]

R. A. Klemm and K. Kadowaki, Output from a Joseph- son stimulated terahertz ampliﬁed radiation emitter, J. Phys.: Condensed Matter 22, 3745701 (2010)

2010
[44]

Kashiwagi, K

T. Kashiwagi, K. Sakamoto, H. Kubo, Y. Shibano, T. Enomoto, T. Kitamura, K. Asanuma, T. Yasui, C. Watanabe, K. Nakade, Y. Saiwai, T. Katsuragawa, M. Tsujimoto, R. Yoshizaki, T. Yamamoto, H. Minami, R. A. Klemm, and K. Kadowaki, A high- Tc intrinsic Joseph- son emitter tunable ...

2015 doi
[45]

Kashiwagi, T

T. Kashiwagi, T. Yamamoto, H. Minami, M. Tsujimoto, R. Yoshizaki, K. Delfanazari, T. Kitamura, C. Watan- abe, K. Nakade, T. Yasui, K. Asanuma, Y. Saiwai, Y. Shibano, T. Enomoto, H. Kubo, K. Sakamoto, T. Kat- suragawa, B. Markovi´ c, J. Mirkovi´ c, R. A. Klemm, and K. Kadowaki,...

2015 doi
[46]

Delfanazari, R

K. Delfanazari, R. A. Klemm, H. J. Joyce, D. A. Ritchie, and K. Kadowaki, Integrated, portable, tunable, and co- herent terahertz sources and sensitive detectors based on layered superconductors, Proc. IEEE 108, 721-734 (2020). DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2958810

2020
[47]

Tsuijimoto, K

M. Tsuijimoto, K. Yamaki, K. Deguchi, T. Yamamoto, T. Kashiwagi, H. Minami, M. Tachiki, K. Kadowaki, and R. A. Klemm, Geometrical resonance conditions for THz radiation from the intrinsic Josephson junctions in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 037005 (2010)

2010
[48]

Benseman, K

T. Benseman, K. E. Gray, A. E. Koshelev, W. K. Kwok, U. Welp, H. Minami, K. Kadowaki, and T. Yamamoto, Powerful terahertz emission from Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ mesa arrays, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 022602 (2013). doi: 10.1063/1.4813536

2013 doi
[49]

C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory, Analysis and Design, 3rd Ed., Hoboken, NJ, Wiley (2005)

2005
[50]

J. R. Rain, PeiYu Cai, Alexander Baekey, Matthew A. Reinhard, Roman I. Vasquez, Andrew C. Silverman, Christopher L. Cain, and Richard A. Klemm, Wave- functions for high-symmetry, thin microstrip antennas, and two-dimesnional quantum boxes, Phys. Rev. A 104, 062205 (2021)

2021
[51]

Jacobs, S

Th. Jacobs, S. O. Katterwe, H. Motzkau, A. Rydh, A. Maljuk, T. Helm, C. Putzke, E. Kampert, M. V. Kartsovnik, and V. M. Krasnov, Electron-tunneling mea- surements of low-Tc single-layer Bi2+xSr2−yCuO6+δ : Ev- idence for a scaling disparity between superconducting and pseudogap...

2012
[52]

Jacobs, S

Th. Jacobs, S. O. Katterwe, and V. M. Krasnov, Su- perconducting correlations above Tc in the pseudo- gap state of Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ cuprates revealed by angular-dependent magnetotunneling, Phys. Rev. B 94, 220501(R), (2016)

2016
[53]

S. O. Katterwe, Th. Jacobs, A. Maljuk, and V. M. Krasnov, Low anisotropy of the upper critical ﬁeld in a strongly anisotropic layered cuprate Bi 2. 15Sr1. 9CuO6+δ : Evidence for a paramagnetically limited superconductiv- ity, Phys. Rev. B 89, 214516 (2014)

2014
[54]

Lars Onsager, Crystal Statistics. I. A Two-Dimensional Model with an Order-Disorder Transition, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944)

1944
[55]

Shankar, Quantum Field Theory and Condensed Mat- ter, An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK 2017)

R. Shankar, Quantum Field Theory and Condensed Mat- ter, An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK 2017). arXiv:2501.13322v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] 24 Jan 2025 Supplementary Material: Model for the commensurate charge -density waves in under-hole-doped cuprate ...

2017 arXiv
[56]

(12) 2 Then, we considered the three cases of L = 3 and M = 3

We found that Z321(K) = 4[9 cosh( K) + 6 cosh(3K) + cosh(7K)], and that Z32N for N = 2, 3 both satisfy Z32N (K, K ′) [Z113(K ′)/ 2]N (N +1) → K ′ → ±∞ Z321(N K). (12) 2 Then, we considered the three cases of L = 3 and M = 3. We found that Z331(K) = 4[36 + 48 cosh(2 K) + 23 cos...

1906

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

R. A. Klemm, Layered Superconductors, Vol. I (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2012)

work page 2012

[2] [2]

R. A. Klemm, Striking similarities between the pseu- dogap phenomena in cuprates and in layered organic and dichalcogenide superconductors, Physica C 341.348, 839.842 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0921-4534(00)00708-5

work page doi:10.1016/s0921-4534(00)00708-5 2000

[3] [3]

R. A. Klemm, Pristine and intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide superconductors, Physica C 514, 86 (2015)

work page 2015

[4] [4]

J. A. Wilson, F. J. DiSalvo, and S. Mahajan, Charge- density waves and superlattices in the metallic transi- tion metal dichalcogenides, Adv. Phys. 24 (2), 117-201 (1975). doi. 10.1080/00018737500101391

doi:10.1080/00018737500101391 1975

[5] [5]

J. P. Tidman, O. Singh, D.E. Curzon, and R. F. Frindt, The phase transition in 2 H-TaS2 at 75 K, Phil. Mag. 30, 1191-1194 (1974)

work page 1974

[6] [6]

W. C. Tonjes, V. A. Greanya, R. Liu, C. G. Olson, and P. Molini´ e, Charge-density-wave mechanism in the 2H-NbSe2 family: Angle-resolved photoemission studies, Phys. Rev. B 63, 235101 (2001)

work page 2001

[7] [7]

F. R. Gamble, F. J. DiSalvo, R. A. Klemm, and T. H. Geballe, Superconductivity in layered structure organometallic crystals, Science 168, 568 (1970)

work page 1970

[8] [8]

A. H. Thompson, F. R. Gamble, and R. F. Koehler, Ef- fects of intercalation on electron transport in tantalum disulﬁde, Phys. Rev. B 5(8), 2811 (1972)

work page 1972