Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

On coefficients of operator product expansions for quantum field theories with ordinary, holomorphic, and topological spacetime dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes that OPE coefficients in translation-invariant theories on $\mathbb{R}^m\times\mathbb{C}^n\times\mathbb{R}^p$ are the sheaf cohomology classes of functions constant along topological and holomorphic along holomorphic…

desk verdict A clean sheaf-cohomology computation plus an honest physical conjecture; the main gap is the uncomputed projective limit for non-conformal theories. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05077 v2 pith:54RCHV4Y submitted 2025-02-07 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Luigi Alfonsi , Hyungrok Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords operatorproductexpansionsheafcohomologyderivedfunctionsghostnumberraviolovertexalgebratopologicalfieldtheoryholomorphicMayer-Vietoris
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum field theories on spacetimes with topological, holomorphic, and ordinary directions can have operator product expansions whose coefficients are not ordinary functions but 'derived' functions carrying nonzero ghost number. This paper proposes that, assuming translation symmetry, the space of possible OPE coefficients on $\mathbb{R}^m\times\mathbb{C}^n\times\mathbb{R}^p$ is the sheaf cohomology of the deleted origin with respect to the sheaf of complex-valued smooth functions that are constant along the topological directions and holomorphic along the holomorphic directions. It computes that cohomology explicitly. The result gives necessary and sufficient conditions for derived functions to appear: they do so exactly when $m+n>0$ and $p>0$, or when $m+n>1$ and $p=0$. A sympathetic reader would care because this organizes the known cases (holomorphic theories with Hartogs obstructions, raviolo theories, topological theories) into one classification and predicts a new smooth analogue of the raviolo.

What carries the argument

The central object is the sheaf $\mathcal{O}$ on $\mathbb{R}^m\times\mathbb{C}^n\times\mathbb{R}^p$ of complex-valued smooth functions that are locally constant along the $m$ topological coordinates and holomorphic along the $n$ complex coordinates, equipped with the ordinary analytic topology. The computation of its cohomology on the punctured spacetime is carried by a two-open cover of $(\mathbb{R}^m\times\mathbb{C}^n\times\mathbb{R}^p)\setminus\{0\}$, so the Čech-to-derived spectral sequence reduces to a Mayer–Vietoris long exact sequence; a Künneth formula for Fréchet nuclear sheaves separates the contributions. The shift $[-m-n]$ or $[1-m-n]$ in the formula is what places the singular-part quotient in nonzero ghost number, and the vanishing conditions $m+n=0$ or $mn=0$ are what keep ordinary and one-dimensional holomorphic theories free of derived coefficients.

What would settle it

If a two-point OPE in any theory with a declared topological direction produces a coefficient that depends on the separation along that direction, or a coefficient with nonzero anti-holomorphic dependence along a declared holomorphic direction, that coefficient lies outside the sheaf cohomology (9) and would falsify the physical hypothesis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The main theorem states that for $p\ge 1$, $$H^\bullet((\mathbb{R}^m\times\mathbb{C}^n\times\mathbb{R}^p)\setminus\{0\},\mathcal{O})=Z_{n,p}\oplus(\tilde Y_{n,p}/Y_{n,p})[-m-n],$$ while for $mn>0$ and $p=0$ it is $Z_{n,p}\oplus Y_{n,p}[1-m-n]$; all other cases are zero. Here $Z_{n,p}$ is the space of functions holomorphic on $\mathbb{C}^n$ and smooth on $\mathbb{R}^p$, $\tilde Y_{n,p}$ allows singularities at the origin in the ordinary directions, and $Y_{n,p}$ is the corresponding space without the deleted point. The paper then makes the physical hypothesis that the possible OPE coefficients in a theory on this spacetime are exactly the elements of this cohomology. Under that hypothesis, nonzero ghost number appears precisely when the spacetime contains at least one topological or holomorphic direction together with an ordinary direction, or when it contains more than one such mixed direction with no ordinary directions. This reproduces the ordinary OPE for $(0,0,p)$, the $\mathbb{C}\oplus\mathbb{C}[1-m]$ binary operations of a topological theory, the Hartogs-forced higher cohomology of holomorphic theories in dimension $n\ge 2$, and the raviolo and smooth raviolo cases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that actual OPE coefficients are literally captured by the sheaf cohomology of the punctured flat spacetime, with non-conformal corrections represented by the projective limit in equation (10); if renormalization, additional symmetries, or nontrivial spacetime topology changes the local analytic behavior, the predicted ghost-number content need not transfer to physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ordinary quantum field theories, $(m,n,p)=(0,0,p)$, have only ordinary smooth functions as OPE coefficients, so no ghost-number structure appears.
  • Pure topological theories, $(m,0,0)$, have binary coefficient space $\mathbb{C}\oplus\mathbb{C}[1-m]$, matching the two operations (multiplication and degree-$1-m$ Poisson bracket) of an $E_m$-algebra.
  • Holomorphic theories on $\mathbb{C}^n$ with $n\ge 2$ acquire derived coefficients in degree $n-1$, as required by Hartogs' theorem, and the paper identifies those classes explicitly via the space $\mathcal{O}((\mathbb{C}^\times)^n)/X_n$.
  • The raviolo case $(1,1,0)$ and the new smooth raviolo case $(1,0,p)$ both acquire a degree $-1$ derived part, so the smooth raviolo provides a non-supersymmetric analogue in one topological plus several ordinary dimensions.
  • If the hypothesis is correct, the presence of derived functions is governed entirely by the counts $(m,n,p)$: $m+n>0$ with $p>0$, or $m+n>1$ with $p=0$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-open-cover computation should extend to multipoint configuration spaces, and would then organize the higher operations entering generalized Borcherds identities; the paper only gestures at this direction.
  • The physical hypothesis fixes the space of possible coefficients but not which classes a given dynamics realizes; a natural open problem is a selection rule from renormalization or from the specific operator content that determines which sheaf cohomology classes actually appear.
  • The projective limit in equation (10) is where non-conformal corrections enter; if this limit is replaced by a genuine local germ computation, the ghost-number conditions could vary from point to point on a curved spacetime, a regime the paper explicitly excludes.
  • The smooth raviolo construction suggests that topological reduction, rather than a full cohomological twist, can produce derived OPE coefficients in non-supersymmetric settings; testing this in a simple topologically reduced free theory would be a direct check of the hypothesis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the sheaf cohomology H^•((R^m × C^n × R^p) \ {0}, O), where O is the sheaf of complex-valued smooth functions that are constant along R^m and holomorphic along C^n. Theorem 1 claims to compute this cohomology, and the authors conjecture that these cohomology groups give the coefficients of operator product expansions in quantum field theories on spacetimes with m topological, n holomorphic, and p ordinary directions. They derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the appearance of nonzero-ghost-number (“derived”) OPE coefficients and discuss examples: holomorphic field theory, ordinary QFT, topological field theory, the holomorphic raviolo, and a new smooth raviolo on R^p with a doubled origin. The appendix provides a Mayer–Vietoris proof of the main theorem, and Section 4 sketches constructions of theories with mixed spacetime directions.

Significance. If the physical identification is accepted, the paper gives a clean and useful classification: sheaf cohomology of the punctured flat spacetime is explicitly computed in terms of function spaces, and the smooth raviolo is a natural smooth analogue of the holomorphic raviolo. The proof of Theorem 1 is a concrete, checkable computation using standard technology, and the paper is honest that the passage from cohomology to OPE coefficients is a hypothesis rather than a theorem. The main value is therefore as a organizing conjecture with worked examples; the load-bearing gaps identified below are concentrated in the step from the global flat-space computation to the local/asymptotic setting in which OPEs actually apply.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 1, §2, Eq. (9); §3.1 and §3.3] Theorem 1 as stated covers only p ≥ 1 and mn > 0 with p = 0, plus the trivial case m = n = p = 0. However, Section 3.1 and especially Eq. (17) in Section 3.3 use the pure branches (m = 0, n > 0, p = 0) and (m > 0, n = 0, p = 0), and the abstract promises an analysis for an arbitrary number of topological, holomorphic, and ordinary dimensions. The proof of Lemma 3 already indicates how these cases follow (the n = 0 case is singular cohomology of R^m \ {0} and the m = 0 case is cohomology of C^n \ {0}), so the omission appears repairable, but the formal statement of the central theorem does not currently deliver the claimed scope. Please state the unified formula or add the two missing cases explicitly.
  2. [§2, Eq. (10)] The physical identification of OPE coefficients with Eq. (9) is only supported for globally flat spacetime. For non-conformal theories, the paper itself retreats to the limit G_{m,n,p} = lim_{←} H(U \ {x}, O), but this limit is never computed, and as written it is not the germ construction used later in §3.5: a projective limit over all open neighbourhoods U of x with the usual restriction maps produces global functions on R^p \ {x}, whereas a germ at x is a direct limit over shrinking neighbourhoods. This distinction is consequential, because OPEs are local/asymptotic data, and the exact coefficient spaces claimed in the abstract are not established unless Eq. (10) is defined and computed (or the conjecture is explicitly restricted to settings where global flat-space cohomology applies). This is a load-bearing gap in the central claim.
  3. [§4.2, Eqs. (29)–(33)] The topological-reduction examples start from a supercharge with {Q,Q} = P_x and then impose the zero-mode condition ∂_x Φ = 0 to make Q nilpotent. This discards x-dependent field modes, so the resulting theory is not a cohomological twist of the original theory in the sense used elsewhere in the paper; the authors acknowledge this (“does not provide full-fledged cohomological twists”). As presented, these examples therefore do not demonstrate that a genuinely mixed topological/ordinary theory with the coefficient spaces of Eq. (9) exists, unless the reduced theory is given a more careful QFT definition. I would ask the authors to either supply such a construction or explicitly mark these as heuristic toy models.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2, physical hypothesis paragraph] The sentence “a quantum field theory on R^m × C^n × C^p” should read “R^m × C^n × R^p”; the holomorphic factor is already C^n.
  2. [§3.5, Eqs. (22) and (24), Fig. 2] Several displayed expressions are corrupted by replacement glyphs (“∝⊑⌉⌋𝑦”), apparently intended to be “ordinary y”; these should be fixed before publication.
  3. [A, proof of Lemma 3, Eq. (44)] In a lemma with p = 0, Eq. (44) writes H^0((R^m × C^n × R^p) \ {0}, O); the factor R^p should be absent.
  4. [§3.3, paragraph on E_m-algebras] The phrase “the m-point correlators of this theory are given by the little m-discs operad” is imprecise: the E_m operad controls all k-point operations, not only the m-point ones; please rephrase.
  5. [§2, Eq. (10)] The notation “Blim” is unexplained; if it denotes a pro-object limit or a different limiting construction, it should be defined, and the difference from an ordinary projective limit should be stated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sheaf-cohomology computation is independent, the physical bridge is explicitly labelled a hypothesis, and the only self-citations are illustrative rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central mathematical result, Theorem 1, is a direct sheaf-cohomology computation using the Mayer–Vietoris sequence and the Künneth formula for nuclear Fréchet sheaves; it does not assume the physical OPE conclusion. The paper then explicitly states the physical interpretation as a hypothesis — 'we make the following physical hypothesis' — rather than as a derivation from OPE axioms, so no fitted parameter or input quantity is being renamed as a prediction. The examples in Section 3 compare the computed cohomology with known physical expectations (holomorphic OPEs, ordinary QFT, TQFT, raviolo theories) but do not use those expectations to prove the theorem. The only self-citation is to the authors' own raviolo paper [AKY25], and it appears in illustrative contexts alongside the independent references [GW23, GRW23]; the existence of a smooth analogue is not forced by that citation. The paper also explicitly acknowledges that the global computation (9) is not local and 'will not be applicable to spacetimes with nontrivial topology', and it flags the projective-limit issue for non-conformal theories, which is a scope caveat rather than evidence of circularity. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained: the theorem is proven from standard mathematics, and the physical claim is openly conjectural.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central theorem is a standard sheaf-cohomology computation with no fitted parameters. The physical interpretation adds domain assumptions and one explicitly conjectural identification between sheaf cohomology and OPE coefficients.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Mayer-Vietoris long exact sequence and Künneth formula hold for sheaves of Fréchet nuclear spaces.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1 in Appendix A, citing [Kau67].
  • standard math Cartan's theorem B and Hartogs extension theorem describe cohomology of Stein covers of C^n\ {0}.
    Used in Lemma 2 and the holomorphic example in Section 3.1.
  • domain assumption The physical OPE coefficients are exactly elements of the sheaf cohomology in (9).
    Stated as a conjecture in Section 2; not derived from QFT axioms.
  • domain assumption Spacetime is globally R^m x C^n x R^p and translation invariant.
    Theorem 1 computes only for this flat model; Section 2 notes the result is not local and not applicable to nontrivial topologies.
  • ad hoc to paper A supercharge Q with {Q,Q}=P_x exists and zero-mode truncation makes Q nilpotent for the topological reduction examples.
    Used in Section 4.2 to sketch example theories; the authors state this is not a full cohomological twist.
invented entities (1)
  • smooth raviolo: R^p with a doubled origin, a non-Hausdorff smooth manifold independent evidence
    purpose: Geometric model for OPE coefficients in theories with one topological and p ordinary spacetime dimensions, Section 3.5.
    It is a standard non-Hausdorff manifold construction renamed for analogy with the holomorphic raviolo; it is not a speculative new physical object.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On coefficients of operator product expansions for quantum field theories with ordinary, holomorphic, and topological spacetime dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/54RCHV4Y

@misc{pith2026250205077,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On coefficients of operator product expansions for quantum field theories with ordinary, holomorphic, and topological spacetime dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/54RCHV4Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05077}
}
read the original abstract

In many quantum field theories (such as higher-dimensional holomorphic field theories or raviolo theories), operator product expansions of local operators can have as coefficients not only ordinary functions but also 'derived' functions with nonzero ghost number, which are certain elements of sheaf cohomology. We analyse the 'derived' functions that should appear in operator product expansions for a quantum field theory with an arbitrary number of topological, holomorphic and/or ordinary spacetime dimensions and identify necessary and sufficient conditions for such 'derived' functions to appear. In particular, theories with one topological spacetime dimension and multiple ordinary spacetime dimensions provide a smooth analogue of the (holomorphic) raviolo.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05077 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The two ways of ‘multiplying’ local operators in a topological quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. For the higher product in an (1 + 𝑝)-dimensional smooth raviolo theory, with topological coordinate 𝑥 and ordinary coordinates 𝑦®, one takes the one-form descendent 𝑂 (1) 2 of the operator 𝑂2 and wraps it on an 𝑝-cycle around the other operator 𝑂1 (using an induced volume form for the 𝑝 ordinary directions). The cycle can be deformed along the topological coordinate such that the contour becomes arbitrarily close to… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Factorization Algebras and Quantum Groups from Generalized Poisson Sigma Models

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.5 of 10

    Generalized Poisson sigma models realize deformation quantizations of holomorphic-topological factorization algebras and produce quantum groups as Koszul duals of their boundary algebras.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Raviolo vertex algebras, cochains and conformal blocks

    Luigi Alfonsi, Hyungrok Kim ( CJK* UTF8 bsmi 金炯錄 CJK* ) , and Charles Alastair Stephen Young. Raviolo vertex algebras, cochains and conformal blocks . International Mathematics Research Notices , 2025. To be published. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11917 arXiv:2401.11917

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Notes on Factorization Algebras and TQFTs

    Araminta Amabel. Notes on factorization algebras and TQFT s, July 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01306 arXiv:2307.01306

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Bottini, Ludovic Fraser-Taliente, Liam Gladden, Dewi Sid William Gould, Arthur Platschorre, and Hannah Tillim

    Lakshya Bhardwaj, Lea E. Bottini, Ludovic Fraser-Taliente, Liam Gladden, Dewi Sid William Gould, Arthur Platschorre, and Hannah Tillim. Lectures on generalized symmetries. Physics Reports , 1051:1--87, February 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07547 arXiv:2307.07547 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.11.002 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.11.002

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Chiral Algebras , volume 51 of Colloquium Publications

    Alexander Alexandrovich Beilinson ( Александр Александрович Бейлинсон ) and Vladimir Gershonovich Drinfeld ( Володимир Гершонович Дрінфельд ) . Chiral Algebras , volume 51 of Colloquium Publications . American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S., 2004. https://doi.org/10.1090/coll/051 doi:10.1090/coll/051

    doi:10.1090/coll/051 2004

  5. [5]

    Unravelling the Holomorphic Twist: Central Charges

    Pieter Marc Bomans and Jingxiang Wu ( CJK* UTF8 gbsn 吴敬祥 CJK* ) . Unravelling the holomorphic twist: Central charges. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 405:290, November 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04304 arXiv:2311.04304 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-024-05167-4 doi:10.1007/s00220-024-05167-4

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Factorization algebra

    Kevin Joseph Costello and Owen Gwilliam. Factorization algebra. In Richard Joseph Szabo and Martin Bojowald, editors, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics. Volume 5 , pages 569--583. Academic Press, second edition, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06137 arXiv:2310.06137 , https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00093-8 doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00093-8

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Notes on supersymmetric and holomorphic field theories in dimensions 2 and 4

    Kevin Joseph Costello. Notes on supersymmetric and holomorphic field theories in dimensions 2 and 4. Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly , 9(1):73--165, 2013. https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4234 arXiv:1111.4234 , https://doi.org/10.4310/PAMQ.2013.v9.n1.a3 doi:10.4310/PAMQ.2013.v9.n1.a3

    arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Elliott, Pavel Safronov ( Павел Сафронов ) , and Brian R

    Christopher J. Elliott, Pavel Safronov ( Павел Сафронов ) , and Brian R. Williams. A taxonomy of twists of supersymmetric Y ang-- M ills theory. latin Selecta Mathematica , 28(4):73, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10517 arXiv:2002.10517 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-022-00786-y doi:10.1007/s00029-022-00786-y

    arXiv 2022

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Notes on \(2d\) conformal field theory and string theory

    Dennis Gaitsgory. Notes on \(2d\) conformal field theory and string theory. In Pierre Deligne, David Kazhdan, Pavel Ilyich Etingof ( Павел Ильич Этингоф ) , John Willard Morgan, Daniel Stuart Freed, David Robert Morrison, Lisa Claire Jeffrey, and Edward Witten, editors, Quantu...

    1999 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Generalized global symmetries

    Davide Silvano Achille Gaiotto, Anton Nikolaevich Kapustin ( Антон Николаевич Капустин ) , Nathan Seiberg, and Brian Willett. Generalized global symmetries. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2015(02):172, February 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5148 arXiv:1412.5148 , https://...

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Higher operations in perturbation theory

    Davide Silvano Achille Gaiotto, Justin Kulp, and Jingxiang Wu ( CJK* UTF8 gbsn 吴敬祥 CJK* ) . Higher operations in perturbation theory. March 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13049 arXiv:2403.13049

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Cohomological vertex algebras , January 2025

    Colton Griffin. Cohomological vertex algebras , January 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18720 arXiv:2501.18720 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.18720 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.18720

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    french Technique de descente et théorèmes d'existence en géométrie algébriques

    Alexander Grothendieck. french Technique de descente et théorèmes d'existence en géométrie algébriques. II. Le théorème d'existence en théorie formelle des modules . In french Séminaire Bourbaki : années 1958/59 - 1959/60, exposés 169 - 204 , number 5 in french Séminaire Bourb...

    1958

  6. [14]

    Williams

    Niklas Garner, Surya Raghavendran, and Brian R. Williams. Higgs and C oulomb branches from superconformal raviolo vertex algebras. 10 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08524 arXiv:2310.08524

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Williams

    Niklas Garner and Brian R. Williams. Raviolo vertex algebras. August 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04414 arXiv:2308.04414

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    german Einige Folgerungen aus der Cauchyschen Integralformel bei Funktionen mehrerer Veränderlichen

    Fritz Hartogs. german Einige Folgerungen aus der Cauchyschen Integralformel bei Funktionen mehrerer Veränderlichen . german Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse , 36:223--242, 1906. URL: https://ar...

    1906

  9. [17]

    german Eine K ünnethformel für F réchetgarben

    Ludger Kaup. german Eine K ünnethformel für F réchetgarben . german Mathematische Zeitschrift , 97(2):158--168, April 1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01111357 doi:10.1007/BF01111357

    1967 doi

  10. [18]

    Operads and motives in deformation quantization

    Maxim Lvovich Kontsevich ( Максим Львович Концевич ) . Operads and motives in deformation quantization. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 48(1):35--72, April 1999. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9904055 arXiv:math/9904055 , https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007555725247 doi:10.1023/A:100...

    1999 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Categories and Sheaves , volume 332 of german Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften

    Masaki Kashiwara ( CJK* UTF8 bsmi 柏原正樹 CJK* ) and Pierre Schapira. Categories and Sheaves , volume 332 of german Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, October 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27950-4 doi:10.1007/3-540-27950-4

    2005 doi

  12. [20]

    On the classification of topological field theories

    Jacob Alexander Lurie. On the classification of topological field theories. Current Developments in Mathematics , 2008(1):129--280, 2008. https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0465 arXiv:0905.0465 , https://doi.org/10.4310/CDM.2008.v2008.n1.a3 doi:10.4310/CDM.2008.v2008.n1.a3

    2008 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Formality of the little \( N \)-disks operad

    Pascal Lambrechts and Ismar Volić. Formality of the little \( N \)-disks operad. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society , 230(1079):1--116, November 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.0457 arXiv:0808.0457 , https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1079 doi:10.1090/memo/1079

    2014 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Schechtman ( Вадим В

    Fyodor Georgievich Malikov ( Федор Георгиевич Маликов ) and Vadim V. Schechtman ( Вадим В. Шехтман ) . Homotopy chiral algebras , August 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16787 arXiv:2408.16787 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16787 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.16787

    2024 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Factorization Homology as a Fully Extended Topological Field Theory

    Claudia Isabella Scheimbauer. Factorization Homology as a Fully Extended Topological Field Theory . PhD thesis, german Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich , 2014. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010399715 doi:10.3929/ethz-a-010399715

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    Williams

    Ingmar Akira Saberi and Brian R. Williams. Superconformal algebras and holomorphic field theories. french Annales Henri Poincaré , 24(2):541--604, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04120 arXiv:1910.04120 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-022-01224-7 doi:10.1007/s00023-022-01224-7

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Lectures on Factorization Homology, \( \)-Categories, and Topological Field Theories , volume 39 of SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics

    Hiro Lee Tanaka, Araminta Amabel, Artem Kalmykov ( Артём Калмыков ) , and Lukas Müller. Lectures on Factorization Homology, \( \)-Categories, and Topological Field Theories , volume 39 of SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics . Springer-Verlag, Cham, Switzerland, December 202...

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Chiral homology of elliptic curves and the Zhu algebra

    Jethro van Ekeren and Reimundo Heluani. Chiral homology of elliptic curves and the Zhu algebra. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 386(1):495--550, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.00017 arXiv:1804.00017 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04026-w doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04026-w

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Williams

    Brian R. Williams. The Holomorphic \( \)-Model and its Symmetries . PhD thesis, Northwestern University, June 2008. https://doi.org/10.21985/N2P77S doi:10.21985/N2P77S

    2008 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.