Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study | Paper Citation Record

Observation e98b4dd2-26ce-44c5-bbd9-1463100d95d8 · outbound

This paper cites Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results?British Journal of Political Science, 34(4):589–610, 2004.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results?British Journal of Political Science, 34(4):589–610, 2004

Reference 1

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.350034Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation caee82d1-9f1e-4095-b73f-011272b09175 · outbound

This paper cites Desired personality traits in politicians: Similar to me but more of a leader.Journal of Research in Personality, 88:103990, 2020.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Desired personality traits in politicians: Similar to me but more of a leader.Journal of Research in Personality, 88:103990, 2020

Reference 2

Resolution: malformed identifier; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:50.938501Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation fd551df5-e562-48d2-8a6a-e58dcd50b501 · outbound

This paper cites Measuring party positions in europe: The chapel hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010.Party Politics, 21(1):143–152, 2015.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Measuring party positions in europe: The chapel hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010.Party Politics, 21(1):143–152, 2015

Reference 3

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.338499Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 3fe42499-4dc2-4ee4-8273-df0e8376a755 · outbound

This paper cites Measuring political bias in large language models: What is said and how it is said.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Measuring political bias in large language models: What is said and how it is said

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:52.101883Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation fe9ce005-1e32-4c7e-9364-69b130cca104 · outbound

This paper cites Baumgartner, Christian Breunig, and Emiliano Grossman, editors.Comparative Policy Agendas: The- ory, Tools, Data.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Baumgartner, Christian Breunig, and Emiliano Grossman, editors.Comparative Policy Agendas: The- ory, Tools, Data

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:50.950585Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e2f5e1a8-9f27-42ef-91ac-0190266dc102 · outbound

This paper cites Measuring and explaining political sophistication through textual complexity.American Journal of Political Science, 63(2):491–508, 2019.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Measuring and explaining political sophistication through textual complexity.American Journal of Political Science, 63(2):491–508, 2019

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.327898Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation df00b887-b3ea-40ed-9d26-1085a6c0e6c4 · outbound

This paper cites Rethinking factionalism: Typologies, intra-party dynamics and three faces of factionalism.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Rethinking factionalism: Typologies, intra-party dynamics and three faces of factionalism

Reference 7

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.316931Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 45ae5bfb-6617-4720-ab5a-d6f167674046 · outbound

This paper cites Strategic ambiguity of party positions in multi-party competition.Po- litical Science Research and Methods, 6(3):527–548, 2018.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Strategic ambiguity of party positions in multi-party competition.Po- litical Science Research and Methods, 6(3):527–548, 2018

Reference 8

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.305893Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 17218793-cbf5-435c-8c91-206ca926d018 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Unresolved cited work

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:50.966010Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d7efe7bd-17a2-4b6e-b2af-7e2a908d61de · outbound

This paper cites Farlie.Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Farlie.Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:52.091298Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation d49623d6-9275-44b2-92c4-61f22d1d09c3 · outbound

This paper cites Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:52.080489Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 8b0c17f7-f15d-4ab6-87f0-a56a23df3ab5 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Unresolved cited work

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:52.069322Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 41eb4cf5-f6c0-4e7a-83c6-aa10b5a537a2 · outbound

This paper cites Uncovering political bias in large language models using parliamentary voting records.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08785, 2026.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Uncovering political bias in large language models using parliamentary voting records.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08785, 2026

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:50.980436Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 316ada1d-5979-4868-9c6b-39396b4c48bb · outbound

This paper cites A Framework to Assess the Persuasion Risks Large Language Model Chatbots Pose to Democratic Societies.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study A Framework to Assess the Persuasion Risks Large Language Model Chatbots Pose to Democratic Societies

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:50.984070Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 24996a38-ea61-48f4-a4af-0ff1db445987 · outbound

This paper cites Unmasking Conversational Bias in AI Multiagent Systems.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Unmasking Conversational Bias in AI Multiagent Systems

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:50.988433Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9a5e42df-35a7-4bca-b0cf-5b03a5ecd665 · outbound

This paper cites Aligning Large Language Models with Human Opinions through Persona Selection and Value--Belief--Norm Reasoning.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Aligning Large Language Models with Human Opinions through Persona Selection and Value--Belief--Norm Reasoning

Reference 16

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.742182Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation ef00e1e1-04bc-4d58-ae8a-19ec48067c47 · outbound

This paper cites Large Means Left: Political Bias in Large Language Models Increases with Their Number of Parameters.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Large Means Left: Political Bias in Large Language Models Increases with Their Number of Parameters

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:50.996082Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f6705b27-e83e-4068-a4ac-e2578655d93c · outbound

This paper cites Only a Little to the Left: A Theory-grounded Measure of Political Bias in Large Language Models.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Only a Little to the Left: A Theory-grounded Measure of Political Bias in Large Language Models

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:50.999963Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a13c72c4-b1ec-4768-acfc-1147eaa48dde · outbound

This paper cites Political Neutrality in AI Is Impossible- But Here Is How to Approximate It.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Political Neutrality in AI Is Impossible- But Here Is How to Approximate It

Reference 19

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.004089Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f22bbf9d-300f-4f13-8bea-265cccc592b7 · outbound

This paper cites Tappin, Luke Hewitt, Ed Saunders, Sid Black, Hause Lin, Catherine Fist, Helen Margetts, David G.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Tappin, Luke Hewitt, Ed Saunders, Sid Black, Hause Lin, Catherine Fist, Helen Margetts, David G

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.008543Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7b891800-c7e2-4cc4-b0a6-ef4bf929ebf6 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Unresolved cited work

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.012146Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4dba206f-3148-4f93-a561-f7c2c069c3ce · outbound

This paper cites Power to the parties: Cohesion and competition in the eu- ropean parliament, 1979–2001.British Journal of Political Science, 35(2):209–234, 2005.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Power to the parties: Cohesion and competition in the eu- ropean parliament, 1979–2001.British Journal of Political Science, 35(2):209–234, 2005

Reference 22

Resolution: malformed identifier; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:52.057595Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 4cc7e2a6-fe15-4ed7-9883-cd40bdc0b99a · outbound

This paper cites Changes in party identity: Evidence from party manifestos.Party Politics, 1(2):171–196, 1995.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Changes in party identity: Evidence from party manifestos.Party Politics, 1(2):171–196, 1995

Reference 23

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.279849Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation b676a873-eff5-4586-a574-21c2a7fea317 · outbound

This paper cites Kendall and B.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Kendall and B

Reference 24

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.023052Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8257b176-4029-4c21-8d09-fb544876978e · outbound

This paper cites Hofferbert, and Ian Budge.Parties, Policies, and Democracy.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Hofferbert, and Ian Budge.Parties, Policies, and Democracy

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:52.045014Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 174de677-cbd9-44fa-bce9-960d03ad6238 · outbound

This paper cites White, Adam J.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study White, Adam J

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:52.033973Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 59e56897-51f6-4f56-a41f-bfe591e06dfa · outbound

This paper cites Quantifying and alleviating political bias in language models.Artificial Intelligence, 304:103654, 2022.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Quantifying and alleviating political bias in language models.Artificial Intelligence, 304:103654, 2022

Reference 27

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:52.023117Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation bc75358f-1cb9-4d1f-b6d0-5e5f8122e353 · outbound

This paper cites The prompt makes the person(a): A systematic evaluation of sociodemographic persona prompting for large language models.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study The prompt makes the person(a): A systematic evaluation of sociodemographic persona prompting for large language models

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.037753Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d3d32a86-0966-4a2d-a102-52b23d665e84 · outbound

This paper cites More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias.Public Choice, 198(1):3–23, 2024.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias.Public Choice, 198(1):3–23, 2024

Reference 29

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.041698Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d81883cf-ad40-4f27-bf20-8cfb4f6cfa66 · outbound

This paper cites Mutz and Byron Reeves.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Mutz and Byron Reeves

Reference 30

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.261382Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 37b2b208-1cdd-4eb5-a122-0ccf6ff6a3ca · outbound

This paper cites Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2011.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2011

Reference 31

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.248957Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c34ba030-e24c-476c-9a50-b65b9de1bb9e · outbound

This paper cites Emergent Coordinated Behaviors in Networked LLM Agents: Modeling the Strategic Dynamics of Information Operations.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Emergent Coordinated Behaviors in Networked LLM Agents: Modeling the Strategic Dynamics of Information Operations

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.052886Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 52718439-a013-481d-b0bd-e0466667fe35 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Unresolved cited work

Reference 33

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.236652Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 6edf3cff-fb9a-48d6-932c-d02b81c6a6e1 · outbound

This paper cites Petrocik.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Petrocik

Reference 35

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.223942Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 184874f1-50a6-4fe9-830b-8ff1ef4c0fd8 · outbound

This paper cites Hidden Persuaders: LLMs' Political Leaning and Their Influence on Voters.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Hidden Persuaders: LLMs' Political Leaning and Their Influence on Voters

Reference 36

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.071683Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 076800f6-6973-4ea8-ad9d-9ff22a8c9149 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Unresolved cited work

Reference 37

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.211904Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation ae3083db-56de-4715-810f-aca60f313081 · outbound

This paper cites Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis.West European Politics, 34(6):1272–1283, 2011.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis.West European Politics, 34(6):1272–1283, 2011

Reference 38

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.497318Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation a5a17ccf-0bf3-4622-8816-516977e5ce29 · outbound

This paper cites Political compass or spinning arrow? towards more meaningful evaluations for values and opinions in large language models.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Political compass or spinning arrow? towards more meaningful evaluations for values and opinions in large language models

Reference 39

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:52.011527Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 277b69a6-9507-4dca-86d6-b6f36a11de1c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Unresolved cited work

Reference 40

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.201193Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 23135500-6c27-4b24-862c-5445c5e479ca · outbound

This paper cites The political preferences of LLMs.PLOS ONE, 19(7):e0306621, 2024.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study The political preferences of LLMs.PLOS ONE, 19(7):e0306621, 2024

Reference 41

Resolution: malformed identifier; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.089345Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ade1d56d-0887-4220-b3f4-84f6c75c9a54 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Unresolved cited work

Reference 42

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.182320Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 1872743b-bcfd-44ad-9036-60b4d9394b75 · outbound

This paper cites Democratization and linguistic complexity: The effect of franchise extension on parliamentary discourse, 1832–1915.The Journal of Politics, 78(1):120–136, 2016.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Democratization and linguistic complexity: The effect of franchise extension on parliamentary discourse, 1832–1915.The Journal of Politics, 78(1):120–136, 2016

Reference 43

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.171417Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 1b6e0adf-c3ad-4b50-9a31-80d965a9f751 · outbound

This paper cites The fulfillment of parties’ election pledges: A comparative study on the impact of power sharing.American Journal of Political Science, 61(3):527–542, 2017.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study The fulfillment of parties’ election pledges: A comparative study on the impact of power sharing.American Journal of Political Science, 61(3):527–542, 2017

Reference 44

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.159951Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 32ec5e5b-a970-4dfb-bb43-663aa7d24c94 · outbound

This paper cites Green, and Semra Sevi.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Green, and Semra Sevi

Reference 45

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.146691Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 14fbd369-a8ef-4303-ac0c-c40a9919bb13 · outbound

This paper cites Manifesto project dataset – codebook, version 2021a.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Manifesto project dataset – codebook, version 2021a

Reference 46

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.999523Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 1fb6f7e9-3e05-4a52-9a4f-3d55314f1e2c · outbound

This paper cites Persona prompting as a lens on llm social reasoning.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Persona prompting as a lens on llm social reasoning

Reference 47

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.426650Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 19628bab-becf-4662-bb02-ed4c323fea7b · outbound

This paper cites Auditing Political Exposure Bias: Algorithmic Amplification on Twitter/X During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Auditing Political Exposure Bias: Algorithmic Amplification on Twitter/X During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

Reference 48

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.114431Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d7a76ec5-569e-4122-9f36-70a72d13da83 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study Unresolved cited work

Reference 2024

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:36:51.064131Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Coverage vector

Reference resolution

Outbound references

Pith citing papers