Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech

As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2302.07736.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2302.07736 v2

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 4 of 4 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00

measured 4 of 4 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-12T12:28:14.319148Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-07-04T13:29:51.132766Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved0
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 276d5d61-adce-4dee-a3d2-4613ec4588f7 · inbound

Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena cites this paper.

Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech

Reference 20

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T18:52:59.083672Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 211fcd95-ad95-4953-a3c5-27a25484776d · inbound

Strategic Prompting for Conversational Tasks: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models Across Diverse Conversational Tasks cites this paper.

Strategic Prompting for Conversational Tasks: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models Across Diverse Conversational Tasks Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T12:28:14.319148Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8b58f5a8-1ad7-46d7-a5df-dcd2b6c60968 · inbound

The Hidden Language of Harm: Examining the Role of Emojis in Harmful Online Communication and Content Moderation cites this paper.

The Hidden Language of Harm: Examining the Role of Emojis in Harmful Online Communication and Content Moderation Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech

Reference 2015

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T12:06:19.522538Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8ba0d800-84cc-4916-b9f1-594fba1c1b74 · inbound

Structure Before Collapse: Transient semantic geometry in next-token prediction cites this paper.

Structure Before Collapse: Transient semantic geometry in next-token prediction Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech

Reference 100

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T13:29:51.134105Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.