Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 37 references

Detuning-axis spectroscopy resolves valley splittings down to ~86 µeV at 700 mK, outperforming pulsed-gate methods limited to ~210 µeV.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 07:24 UTC pith:5GE7QLYV

load-bearing objection Clean methods comparison showing DAPS keeps usable valley resolution to ~700 mK while PGS does not; useful for screening, not a new technique.

arxiv 2607.11048 v1 pith:5GE7QLYV submitted 2026-07-13 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Spectroscopy of low-lying valley states in hot Si/SiGe quantum dots

Connor Nasseraddin , Heun Mo Yoo , Tanner M. Janda , Jason R. Petta This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph
keywords valley splittingSi/SiGe quantum dotsdetuning-axis pulsed spectroscopypulsed-gate spectroscopyelectron temperaturespin qubitshigh-throughput cryostats
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Low-lying valley states in silicon quantum dots can ruin spin-qubit performance, so device makers need a fast way to measure those energy gaps while screening new materials. This paper compares two common spectroscopy tools on the same Si/SiGe double quantum dot at electron temperatures up to 700 mK. Pulsed-gate spectroscopy, which couples the dots to a thermally broadened Fermi sea, loses resolution quickly and can only resolve gaps larger than about 210 µeV at 700 mK. Detuning-axis pulsed spectroscopy, which only involves interdot charge transitions, keeps its peaks sharp enough to resolve gaps as small as ~86 µeV at the same temperature. The practical payoff is that valley-splitting maps can now be taken in inexpensive high-throughput cryostats instead of dilution refrigerators, speeding the search for heterostructures that consistently deliver large valley gaps.

Core claim

At electron temperatures around 700 mK, detuning-axis pulsed spectroscopy (DAPS) resolves silicon quantum-dot valley splittings as small as ~86 µeV, while pulsed-gate spectroscopy (PGS) is limited by thermal broadening of the Fermi reservoir to a resolution of only ~210 µeV. DAPS therefore remains usable for high-throughput materials screening at temperatures accessible with pumped-helium cryostats.

What carries the argument

Detuning-axis pulsed spectroscopy (DAPS): a non-adiabatic pulse sequence that parks the double-dot detuning near an anticrossing long enough for charge dephasing to mix the charge states; the resulting spectral width is set by dephasing rather than by the thermal width of a Fermi sea.

Load-bearing premise

The width measured on a single ~120 µeV valley feature at 690 mK, together with the rule that a signal-to-noise ratio of one defines the detection limit, correctly predicts the smallest valley splitting that can still be resolved.

What would settle it

Repeat DAPS on a device known to have a valley splitting near 80–90 µeV at 700 mK; if the two peaks cannot be resolved or the extracted gap is systematically wrong, the claimed resolution floor fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Valley-splitting statistics can be collected on large device arrays inside inexpensive pumped-helium cryostats rather than dilution refrigerators.
  • Rapid materials feedback loops become practical for testing proposed valley-enhancing designs such as Ge spikes or modulated Ge concentration in the silicon well.
  • High-throughput cryogenic probe stations become viable platforms for screening Si/SiGe heterostructures before full qubit fabrication.
  • The same temperature window that works for DAPS also allows conveyor-mode shuttling studies of valley landscapes to be run at elevated base temperatures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If charge-noise dephasing grows more slowly with temperature than Fermi broadening, DAPS may remain useful even above 1 K, further lowering the cost of screening cryostats.
  • A wafer-scale DAPS map correlated with interface roughness or Ge concentration would give the first statistically powered design rule for valley engineering.
  • The same interdot-only protocol could be adapted to measure orbital or spin-orbit splittings in other semiconductor platforms where reservoir thermal broadening is the limiting factor.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript compares pulsed-gate spectroscopy (PGS) and detuning-axis pulsed spectroscopy (DAPS) for extracting valley splittings in a Si/SiGe double quantum dot at electron temperatures up to ~700 mK. On an Intel triple-dot device, both methods resolve a right-dot valley splitting EV,R ~120 µeV at base temperature. PGS features (dot-lead transitions) broaden with the Fermi-reservoir linewidth ~3.5 kBTe and become poorly resolved near 300 mK, while DAPS features (interdot anticrossings) remain clearly separated to 690 mK. Defining SNR = EV/w = 1 with w the average FWHM of the fitted peaks, the authors estimate minimum resolvable splittings of ~210 µeV (PGS) and ~86 µeV (DAPS) at Te ~700 mK, and conclude that DAPS is the preferred technique for high-throughput screening cryostats.

Significance. Valley splitting remains a materials bottleneck for scalable Si spin qubits. A practical, temperature-robust spectroscopy method that can be run in inexpensive pumped-He systems or cryogenic probe stations would accelerate heterostructure and gate-stack screening. The work supplies a direct, same-device comparison of two established techniques, independent lever-arm calibrations (thermal interdot broadening and finite-bias triangles), and quantitative linewidth-versus-temperature data that support the ranking of DAPS over PGS at elevated Te. These results are immediately useful to groups developing rapid-prototyping platforms.

minor comments (5)
  1. The conversion of a single measured FWHM at EV ~120 µeV into a minimum-resolvable splitting via SNR = EV/w = 1 is an operational definition rather than a full resolution-function measurement across many EV values. A short clarifying sentence in the paragraph that introduces Fig. 4 would prevent over-reading of the ~86 µeV and ~210 µeV numbers.
  2. Gaussian smoothing with σ = 8.2 µeV is applied before fitting (Figs. 2 and 3). Although the width is below kBTe at 100 mK, stating that the extracted peak separations and HWHMs are insensitive to this filter (or showing the raw line cuts) would strengthen reproducibility.
  3. Only one device and one valley feature are reported. A brief remark that the ranking of the two methods is expected to be general (because it follows from the distinct broadening mechanisms) would help readers assess transferability.
  4. In Fig. 2(c) the PGS data at 300 mK are already near the merging limit; quoting the reduced χ^{2} or residual of the two-Fermi-function fit would make the uncertainty estimate more transparent.
  5. Minor typographical consistency: the abstract uses “~86 µeV” while the main text sometimes writes “∼86 µeV”; standardize the tilde notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: empirical side-by-side comparison of two spectroscopy methods with independent calibrations and operational resolution estimates.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental performance comparison of PGS versus DAPS on the same Si/SiGe device: both resolve EV,R ≈ 120 µeV at base temperature, PGS features thermally broaden and merge by ~300 mK while DAPS remains resolvable to ~690 mK, and the authors convert the observed linewidths (via the operational definition SNR = EV/w = 1) into minimum-resolvable estimates of ~210 µeV (PGS, from 3.5 kBTe) and ~86 µeV (DAPS, from measured FWHM). Lever arms are obtained independently (thermal broadening of the interdot transition; finite-bias triangles). No quantity is fitted from one data subset and then re-presented as a prediction of a closely related quantity; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation to force the ranking of the methods; and the SNR/min-EV step is explicitly definitional rather than a claimed first-principles derivation. The work is therefore self-contained against its own measurements and ordinary external references.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental comparison that rests on standard quantum-dot electrostatics and thermal-broadening formulas; free parameters are the usual lever arms and filter widths needed to convert gate voltages into energy. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • interdot lever arm α = 85 μeV/mV
    Converted detuning voltage to energy; extracted from thermal broadening of the (1,0)–(0,1) transition at 300 mK and used for all subsequent energy axes.
  • right-gate lever arm α_R = 78 μeV/mV
    Converted PGS pulse amplitude and gate voltage into energy; obtained from finite-bias triangles.
  • Gaussian filter width = 8.2 μeV
    Applied to all line-cuts before fitting; chosen below k_B T at 100 mK but still affects reported peak widths.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption PGS linewidth is set by 3.5 k_B T thermal broadening of the Fermi reservoir
    Used to draw the theoretical SNR curve in Fig. 4 and to estimate the 210 μeV resolution floor; standard result for tunnel-rate spectroscopy.
  • domain assumption DAPS spectral width is dominated by charge dephasing at the anticrossing rather than thermal population of the leads
    Central explanation for why DAPS remains resolvable at 700 mK; taken from Chen et al. 2021 and not re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper SNR = E_V / w = 1 defines the practical resolution limit
    Operational definition introduced in the text to convert measured widths into minimum resolvable valley splittings.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 13891 in / 2401 out tokens · 27883 ms · 2026-07-14T07:24:02.750563+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The presence of low-lying valley states in Si may hinder the development of large-scale spin-based quantum processors. Rapid prototyping of novel Si/SiGe heterostructures and gate stacks will be central to identifying pathways that increase the valley splitting. We compare the performance of pulsed-gate spectroscopy (PGS) and detuning axis spectroscopy (DAPS) at temperatures up to 700 mK. We find that DAPS outperforms PGS, with DAPS resolving valley splittings as small as ~86 $\mu$eV, while the energy resolution of PGS is only ~210~$\mu$eV. Our work demonstrates that DAPS can be used to efficiently extract valley splittings at elevated temperatures in high throughput cryostats.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11048 by Connor Nasseraddin, Heun Mo Yoo, Jason R. Petta, Tanner M. Janda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) False-color scanning electron microscope image [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of PGS. (a) Top panel: A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Sample PGS valley splitting measurement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Loss \ and\ author D

    author author D. Loss \ and\ author D. P. \ DiVincenzo ,\ title title Quantum computation with quantum dots , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 57 ,\ pages 120 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 1998

  2. [2]

    Burkard , author T

    author author G. Burkard , author T. D. \ Ladd , author A. Pan , author J. M. \ Nichol ,\ and\ author J. R. \ Petta ,\ title title Semiconductor spin qubits , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.025003 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 025003 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.025003 2023

  3. [3]

    \ Wu , author L

    author author Y.-H. \ Wu , author L. C. \ Camenzind , author P. Bütler , author I. K. \ Jin , author A. Noiri , author K. Takeda , author T. Nakajima , author T. Kobayashi , author G. Scappucci , author H.-S. \ Goan ,\ and\ author S. Tarucha ,\ title title Simultaneous high-fidelity single-qubit gates in a spin qubit array , \ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ htt...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Xue , author M

    author author X. Xue , author M. Russ , author N. Samkharadze , author B. Undseth , author A. Sammak , author G. Scappucci ,\ and\ author L. M. \ Vandersypen ,\ title title Quantum logic with spin qubits crossing the surface code threshold , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04273-w journal journal Nature \ volume 601 ,\ pages 343--347 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04273-w 2022

  5. [5]

    author author A. R. \ Mills , author C. R. \ Guinn , author M. J. \ Gullans , author A. J. \ Sigillito , author M. M. \ Feldman , author E. Nielsen ,\ and\ author J. R. \ Petta ,\ title title Two-qubit silicon quantum processor with operation fidelity exceeding 99\ https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.abn5130 journal journal Sci. Adv. \ volume 8...

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn5130 2022

  6. [6]

    Noiri , author K

    author author A. Noiri , author K. Takeda , author T. Nakajima , author T. Kobayashi , author A. Sammak , author G. Scappucci ,\ and\ author S. Tarucha ,\ title title Fast universal quantum gate above the fault-tolerance threshold in silicon , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04182-y journal journal Nature \ volume 601 ,\ pages 338--342 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04182-y 2022

  7. [7]

    Borjans , author X

    author author F. Borjans , author X. G. \ Croot , author X. Mi , author M. J. \ Gullans ,\ and\ author J. R. \ Petta ,\ title title Resonant microwave-mediated interactions between distant electron spins , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1867-y journal journal Nature \ volume 577 ,\ pages 195--198 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1867-y 2020

  8. [8]

    Dijkema , author X

    author author J. Dijkema , author X. Xue , author P. Harvey-Collard , author M. Rimbach-Russ , author S. L. \ de Snoo , author G. Zheng , author A. Sammak , author G. Scappucci ,\ and\ author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen ,\ title title Cavity-mediated iSWAP oscillations between distant spins , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02694-8 journal journal Nat. Ph...

    doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02694-8 2025

  9. [9]

    Seidler , author T

    author author I. Seidler , author T. Struck , author R. Xue , author N. Focke , author S. Trellenkamp , author H. Bluhm ,\ and\ author L. R. \ Schreiber ,\ title title Conveyor-mode single-electron shuttling in Si/SiGe for a scalable quantum computing architecture , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-022-00615-2 journal journal npj Quantum Inf. \ volume 8 ,...

    doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00615-2 2022

  10. [10]

    De Smet , author Y

    author author M. De Smet , author Y. Matsumoto , author A.-M. J. \ Zwerver , author L. Tryputen , author S. L. \ de Snoo , author S. V. \ Amitonov , author S. R. \ Katiraee-Far , author A. Sammak , author N. Samkharadze , author \"O . G \"u l , author R. N. M. \ Wasserman , author E. Greplov \'a , author M. Rimbach-Russ , author G. Scappucci ,\ and\ autho...

    doi:10.1038/s41565-025-01920-5 2025

  11. [11]

    Undseth , author N

    author author B. Undseth , author N. Meggiato , author Y.-H. \ Wu , author S. R. \ Katiraee-Far , author L. Tryputen , author S. L. \ de Snoo , author D. D. \ Esposti , author G. Scappucci , author E. Greplová ,\ and\ author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen ,\ title title Weight-four parity checks with silicon spin qubits , \ @noop \ ( year 2026 ) ,\ https://arxiv....

    arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Neyens , author O

    author author S. Neyens , author O. K. \ Zietz , author T. F. \ Watson , author F. Luthi , author A. Nethwewala , author H. C. \ George , author E. Henry , author M. Islam , author A. J. \ Wagner , author F. Borjans , author E. J. \ Connors , author J. Corrigan , author M. J. \ Curry , author D. Keith , author R. Kotlyar , author L. F. \ Lampert , author ...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07275-6 2024

  13. [13]

    Tidjani , author D

    author author H. Tidjani , author D. Denora , author M. Chan , author J. H. \ Ungerer , author B. van Straaten , author S. D. \ Oosterhout , author L. Stehouwer , author G. Scappucci ,\ and\ author M. Veldhorst ,\ title title A three-dimensional array of quantum dots , \ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2512.01634 arXiv:2512.01634 NoStop

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Takeda , author A

    author author K. Takeda , author A. Noiri , author T. Nakajima , author T. Kobayashi ,\ and\ author S. Tarucha ,\ title title Quantum error correction with silicon spin qubits , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04986-6 journal journal Nature \ volume 608 ,\ pages 682--686 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04986-6 2022

  15. [15]

    author author Members of the HRL Quantum Team and Collaborators ,\ title title A digitally controlled silicon quantum processing unit , \ @noop \ ( year 2026 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2604.16216 arXiv:2604.16216 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    author author A. M. \ Tyryshkin , author S. Tojo , author J. J. L. \ Morton , author H. Riemann , author N. V. \ Abrosimov , author P. Becker , author H.-J. \ Pohl , author T. Schenkel , author M. L. W. \ Thewalt , author K. M. \ Itoh ,\ and\ author S. A. \ Lyon ,\ title title Electron spin coherence exceeding seconds in high-purity silicon , \ https://do...

    doi:10.1038/nmat3182 2012

  17. [17]

    Ha , author S

    author author W. Ha , author S. D. \ Ha , author M. D. \ Choi , author Y. Tang , author A. E. \ Schmitz , author M. P. \ Levendorf , author K. Lee , author J. M. \ Chappell , author T. S. \ Adams , author D. R. \ Hulbert , author E. Acuna , author R. S. \ Noah , author J. W. \ Matten , author M. P. \ Jura , author J. A. \ Wright , author M. T. \ Rakher ,\...

    doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03026 2022

  18. [18]

    author author H. C. \ George , author M. T. \ Madzik , author E. M. \ Henry , author A. J. \ Wagner , author M. M. \ Islam , author F. Borjans , author E. J. \ Connors , author J. Corrigan , author M. Curry , author M. K. \ Harper , author D. Keith , author L. Lampert , author F. Luthi , author F. A. \ Mohiyaddin , author S. Murcia , author R. Nair , auth...

    doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05205 2025

  19. [19]

    Ando , author A

    author author T. Ando , author A. B. \ Fowler ,\ and\ author F. Stern ,\ title title Electronic properties of two-dimensional systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.54.437 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 54 ,\ pages 437--672 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.437 1982

  20. [20]

    Mills , author C

    author author A. Mills , author C. Guinn , author M. Feldman , author A. Sigillito , author M. Gullans , author M. Rakher , author J. Kerckhoff , author C. Jackson ,\ and\ author J. Petta ,\ title title High-fidelity state preparation, quantum control, and readout of an isotopically enriched silicon spin qubit , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18...

    doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.064028 2022

  21. [21]

    author author S. G. J. \ Philips , author M. T. \ Madzik , author S. V. \ Amitonov , author S. L. \ de Snoo , author M. Russ , author N. Kalhor , author C. Volk , author W. I. L. \ Lawrie , author D. Brousse , author L. Tryputen , author B. P. \ Wuetz , author A. Sammak , author M. Veldhorst , author G. Scappucci ,\ and\ author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen ,\ t...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05117-x 2022

  22. [22]

    author author C. H. \ Yang , author A. Rossi , author R. Ruskov , author N. S. \ Lai , author F. A. \ Mohiyaddin , author S. Lee , author C. Tahan , author G. Klimeck , author A. Morello ,\ and\ author A. S. \ Dzurak ,\ title title Spin-valley lifetimes in a silicon quantum dot with tunable valley splitting , \ http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3069 journal...

    doi:10.1038/ncomms3069 2069

  23. [23]

    Volmer , author T

    author author M. Volmer , author T. Struck , author J.-S. \ Tu , author S. Trellenkamp , author D. D. \ Esposti , author G. Scappucci , author Łukasz Cywiński , author H. Bluhm ,\ and\ author L. R. \ Schreiber ,\ title title Impact of the local valley splitting on the coherence of conveyor-belt spin shuttling in ^ 28 Si/SiGe , \ @noop \ ( year 2026 a ) ,\...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    author author E. H. \ Chen , author K. Raach , author A. Pan , author A. A. \ Kiselev , author E. Acuna , author J. Z. \ Blumoff , author T. Brecht , author M. D. \ Choi , author W. Ha , author D. R. \ Hulbert , author M. P. \ Jura , author T. E. \ Keating , author R. Noah , author B. Sun , author B. J. \ Thomas , author M. G. \ Borselli , author C. Jacks...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.044033 2021

  25. [25]

    author author M. P. \ Losert , author M. A. \ Eriksson , author R. Joynt , author R. Rahman , author G. Scappucci , author S. N. \ Coppersmith ,\ and\ author M. Friesen ,\ title title Practical strategies for enhancing the valley splitting in Si/SiGe quantum wells , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.125405 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 108 ,\...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.125405 2023

  26. [26]

    McJunkin , author E

    author author T. McJunkin , author E. MacQuarrie , author L. Tom , author S. Neyens , author J. Dodson , author B. Thorgrimsson , author J. Corrigan , author H. E. \ Ercan , author D. Savage , author M. Lagally , et al. ,\ title title Valley splittings in Si/SiGe quantum dots with a germanium spike in the silicon well , \ https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.085406 2021

  27. [27]

    Volmer , author T

    author author M. Volmer , author T. Struck , author A. Sala , author B. Chen , author M. Oberl \"a nder , author T. Offermann , author R. Xue , author L. Visser , author J.-S. \ Tu , author S. Trellenkamp , author . Cywi \' n ski , author H. Bluhm ,\ and\ author L. R. \ Schreiber ,\ title title Mapping of valley splitting by conveyor-mode spin-coherent el...

    doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00852-7 2024

  28. [28]

    Volmer , author T

    author author M. Volmer , author T. Struck , author A. Sala , author J.-S. \ Tu , author S. Trellenkamp , author D. D. \ Esposti , author G. Scappucci , author Łukasz Cywiński , author H. Bluhm ,\ and\ author L. R. \ Schreiber ,\ title title Mapping g-factors and complex intervalley coupling in Si/SiGe by conveyor-mode shuttling , \ @noop \ ( year 2026 b ...

    arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    author author J. C. \ Marcks , author E. Eagen , author E. C. \ Brann , author M. P. \ Losert , author T. Oh , author J. Reily , author C. S. \ Wang , author D. Keith , author F. A. \ Mohiyaddin , author F. Luthi , author M. J. \ Curry , author J. Zhang , author F. J. \ Heremans , author M. Friesen ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Eriksson ,\ title title Valley spl...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67325-z 2025

  30. [30]

    author author J. M. \ Elzerman , author R. Hanson , author L. H. \ Willems van Beveren , author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen ,\ and\ author L. P. \ Kouwenhoven ,\ title title Excited-state spectroscopy on a nearly closed quantum dot via charge detection , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1757023 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 4617--4619 ( yea...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1757023 2004

  31. [31]

    author author C. H. \ Yang , author W. H. \ Lim , author N. S. \ Lai , author A. Rossi , author A. Morello ,\ and\ author A. S. \ Dzurak ,\ title title Orbital and valley state spectra of a few-electron silicon quantum dot , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115319 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 115319 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.115319 2012

  32. [33]

    Burkard \ and\ author J

    author author G. Burkard \ and\ author J. R. \ Petta ,\ title title Dispersive readout of valley splittings in cavity-coupled silicon quantum dots , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.195305 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 195305 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.195305 2016

  33. [34]

    DiCarlo , author H

    author author L. DiCarlo , author H. J. \ Lynch , author A. C. \ Johnson , author L. I. \ Childress , author K. Crockett , author C. M. \ Marcus , author M. P. \ Hanson ,\ and\ author A. C. \ Gossard ,\ title title Differential charge sensing and charge delocalization in a tunable double quantum dot , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.226801 journa...

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.226801 2004

  34. [35]

    author author A. C. \ Johnson , author J. R. \ Petta , author J. M. \ Taylor , author A. Yacoby , author M. D. \ Lukin , author C. M. \ Marcus , author M. P. \ Hanson ,\ and\ author A. C. \ Gossard ,\ title title Triplet-singlet spin relaxation via nuclei in a double quantum dot. \ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03815 journal journal Nature \ volume 435 ,\...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature03815 2005

  35. [36]

    author author D. M. \ Zajac , author T. M. \ Hazard , author X. Mi , author E. Nielsen ,\ and\ author J. R. \ Petta ,\ title title Scalable gate architecture for a one-dimensional array of semiconductor spin qubits , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.054013 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 054013 ( year 2016 b ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.6.054013 2016

  36. [37]

    author author H. M. \ Yoo , author T. M. \ Janda , author C. Nasseraddin ,\ and\ author J. R. \ Petta ,\ title title Directly visualizing the energy level structure of quantum dot molecules , \ @noop \ ( year 2026 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2604.00232 arXiv:2604.00232 NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [38]

    Duan , author F

    author author J. Duan , author F. Torres-Leal ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Nichol ,\ title title Measuring and correcting nanosecond pulse distortions in quantum-dot spin qubits , \ @noop \ ( year 2026 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2602.17899 arXiv:2602.17899 NoStop

    arXiv 2026