Pith. sign in

REVIEW

DAMA/LIBRA and dark matter: decisive tension or contrived cancellation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2510.05216 v2 pith:5M6Y2HZO submitted 2025-10-06 hep-ph

DAMA/LIBRA and dark matter: decisive tension or contrived cancellation

classification hep-ph
keywords damatensionexperimentsmodulationrecoilannualcommondark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ANAIS-112 and COSINE-100 experiments were constructed to test the long-observed dark matter-like annual modulation signal reported by DAMA. While they have reported null results in their annual modulation search, it remains possible that the combined effects of quenching, efficiency, resolution and binning could transform a common nuclear recoil rate into a signal that is visible in some detectors but not others. We assess the tension between DAMA/LIBRA and these latest experiments, under a range of hypotheses ranging from physical to general parameterisations of a common nuclear recoil input. We find that, in the most physically-motivated cases, the tension between DAMA and these other NaI experiments exceeds 5$\sigma$. Lowering the tension to reasonable values requires significant tuning, such as overfitting with large numbers of free parameters, and opposite-sign modulation between recoil signals on sodium versus iodine.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.