REVIEW 1 cited by
Renormalization in the Theory of Open Quantum Systems via the Self-Consistency Condition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We investigate the topic of renormalization in the theory of weakly interacting open quantum systems. Our starting point is an open quantum system interacting with a single heat bath. For a given setup, we discuss that the stationary state of the Davies-GKSL equation is thermodynamically inconsistent with the presence of the Lamb-Stark shift term. For this reason, we postulate the self-consistency condition for the dynamical equations. The condition fixes the renormalization procedure and recovers the thermodynamical consistency. In this way, we rederive the cumulant equation to illustrate how the self-consistency condition enters the derivation of the dynamical equations. The physical interpretation of the renormalization procedure is discussed in terms of the Born approximation. Furthermore, we compare the Lamb-Stark shift term (dynamical correction) with the second-order (static) correction to the so-called mean-force (Gibbs state) Hamiltonian. The discrepancy between the static and the dynamical correction questions the physical meaning of the latter one. Finally, we formulate a simplified renormalization scheme that can be directly applied to Davies-GKSL or Bloch-Redfield equations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Making Non-Markovian master equations accessible with approximate environments
Approximating the bath correlation function by damped exponentials turns non-Markovian master-equation decay rates and Lamb-shift terms into closed algebraic expressions, with the Lamb-shift shown to matter for heat currents.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.