Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 110 references

Circumbinary accretion as a diagnostic for binary--disc misalignment

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Accretion patterns around an eccentric binary fall into three classes that reveal the initial disc tilt: alternating for prograde, none for polar or retrograde, and temporary alternating for near-critical discs that break.

desk verdict A systematic 0-180 degree SPH survey of circumbinary accretion onto an eccentric binary, showing a clean three-way mapping between initial misalignment and accretion alternation, with a temporary alternating phase in breaking discs near the critical tilt; the main caveats are unresolved accretion streams and an untested R_in dependence. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10653 v1 pith:5RU7G34W submitted 2024-12-14 astro-ph.EP

Jeremy L. Smallwood , Ya-Ping Li , Hongping Deng , Alessia Franchini This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords accretiondiscshydrodynamicsbinaries:generalcircumbinarydiscmisalignmentpreferentialbreaking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Binary stars are often surrounded by a circumbinary disc that is tilted relative to their orbit. The paper asks whether the way gas falls onto the two stars reveals that tilt. Using 3D hydrodynamical simulations of an eccentric equal-mass binary with discs initially tilted from 0° to 180°, it finds three classes of accretion behaviour: discs that align prograde with the orbit accrete in an alternating, antiphase pattern (the two stars take turns being the favoured target); discs that align polar or retrograde accrete evenly, except near the critical tilt, where the disc breaks and briefly shows alternating accretion before settling. The authors conclude that this accretion pattern can serve as a diagnostic of the initial binary–disc misalignment, useful for interpreting observed binary accretion variability and, because the simulations are scale-free, for supermassive black hole binaries.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a suite of 3D smoothed-particle hydrodynamics simulations of a live equal-mass eccentric binary with a weakly viscous disc in the bending-wave regime (aspect ratio 0.1, alpha-viscosity parameter 0.01), run for thirteen initial tilts between 0° and 180°. The central object is the inner disc's eccentricity: alternating preferential accretion appears precisely when the inner disc is significantly eccentric, either because the prograde coplanar disc's apsidal precession distorts it, or because a near-critical disc breaks and leaves an eccentric inner fragment, and disappears when the disc is circular. The analytic libration boundary, about 38° and 142° for these parameters, separates the three dynamical classes, so the accretion pattern becomes a proxy for which class the system is in.

What would settle it

Rerun the same tilt suite at higher resolution (or with smaller sink radii) and check whether the prograde-coplanar models still show antiphase alternating accretion and whether the 45° and 135° models still break; and rerun the 45° model with the initial inner disc radius moved from 4a to 2a and 6a — if the disc break moves with the initial inner radius instead of staying at the physically selected warp radius, the temporary alternating phase is an initial-condition artifact rather than a reliable diagnostic.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using 3D hydrodynamical simulations of an equal-mass eccentric binary (initial eccentricity 0.5) fed by a locally isothermal circumbinary disc, this paper tracks the accretion rate onto each star for initial disc tilts from 0° to 180° in 15° steps. It finds that the accretion rate evolution sorts into three classes that match the disc's final alignment: discs that align prograde-coplanar show alternating preferential accretion, with the primary and secondary accreting in antiphase on the disc's apsidal precession timescale; discs that align polar show no alternating preferential accretion, except for the 45° and 135° cases, where the initial tilt lies close to the critical libration boundary, the disc warps strongly and breaks, the inner disc becomes eccentric and drives a temporary alternating phase, and accretion returns to non-alternating as the break propagates outward and the disc recircularizes; and discs that align retrograde-coplanar never show alternating preferential accretion. The paper concludes that the presence, absence, or temporary appearance of alternating preferential accretion can be used as a diagnostic of the initial binary–disc misalignment.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the alternating-versus-non-alternating character of the accretion pattern is unaffected by the unresolved gas dynamics right next to each star; the paper states that the accreting streams are not well resolved and that the absolute accretion rates are resolution-dependent, but it does not show a resolution study of the pattern itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An observed pattern of alternating preferential accretion onto a binary star indicates that its circumbinary disc is on a prograde orbit and aligning toward coplanar, or, if the pattern is temporary, that the disc is near the critical misalignment and has broken during polar alignment.
  • A steady, non-alternating accretion signal is consistent with either polar alignment or retrograde coplanar alignment, so the accretion pattern alone cannot separate those two classes.
  • Because the simulations are scale-free, the same classification can in principle diagnose misalignment around supermassive black hole binaries as well as stellar binaries.
  • The return from alternating back to non-alternating accretion in the near-critical models is a direct signature of the disc re-circularizing after a break, and could be looked for as a temporal sequence in long monitoring campaigns.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the alternating pattern is as reliable as the paper claims, the diagnostic is one-sided: non-alternating accretion cannot tell a polar disc from a retrograde coplanar disc, so observers would need resolved disc geometry to break that degeneracy.
  • The paper's own note that the disc break occurs at the initial inner radius (4a) suggests a cheap numerical control: varying the starting inner radius in the 45° and 135° runs would test whether the break and the temporary alternating phase are physical or set by the initial condition.
  • Because the stars are treated as sink particles and circumstellar discs are not resolved, the buffering effect of real circumstellar discs could smooth or delay the alternating signal; this is a testable prediction for future simulations that resolve those discs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a suite of smoothed-particle hydrodynamics simulations of circumbinary discs around a live, equal-mass, eccentric (e_b=0.5) binary, with initial disc tilts from 0 to 180 degrees in 15-degree increments. The central claim is that the time-dependent accretion pattern onto the two stars can serve as a diagnostic of the initial binary-disc misalignment: discs aligning prograde coplanar show alternating preferential accretion; discs aligning polar show no alternating accretion except for the near-critical 45 and 135 degree cases, which break and temporarily alternate while the inner disc is eccentric; and discs aligning retrograde coplanar show no alternation. The paper connects these patterns to the disc warp, eccentricity, and breaking evolution, and discusses observational applications to systems such as TWA 3A.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides a falsifiable, observationally accessible diagnostic: the presence or absence of alternating preferential accretion onto the binary components, together with any temporary alternating phase, encodes the initial misalignment basin of the circumbinary disc. The strengths of the paper are its systematic 13-run tilt sweep, the use of a live binary with directly measured accretion rates, the internally consistent qualitative narrative connecting disc warping and eccentricity to accretion modulation, and consistency with prior work on coplanar and polar circumbinary discs. The proposed mapping between accretion pattern and misalignment class is a genuine contribution that could motivate long-term monitoring campaigns of T Tauri and other young binaries.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2] The claim that "our results on preferential accretion alternation are not affected by the low resolution" is asserted without demonstration. The text admits that the gaseous streams accreting onto the binary components are not well resolved and that the magnitude of the accretion rates is resolution-dependent. Since the diagnostic is defined by whether the accretion-rate time series alternates between primary and secondary, unresolved stream dynamics could, in principle, change the classification. No resolution study of the alternation pattern is shown. Please provide a convergence test (e.g., a run with a larger particle number or a smaller sink radius) demonstrating that the alternating/non-alternating character of the time series is stable, or explicitly restrict the diagnostic claim to the resolved outer flow.
  2. [Section 4.1 and Fig. 6] The break in the 45-degree and 135-degree runs occurs at approximately 4a, which is exactly the chosen initial inner radius R_in = 4a. The authors acknowledge this coincidence but do not test whether the disc breaking and the temporary alternating-accretion phase persist when R_in is changed. Because the proposed diagnostic for near-critical misalignment relies on this temporary phase, an additional experiment with a different initial inner radius (e.g., 2a or 5a) is needed to distinguish a physical break from a numerical artifact associated with the initial condition.
  3. [Section 3.3 and Figs. 8-10] The classification into "alternating preferential accretion" versus "non-alternating" accretion is made by eye, with no quantitative criterion or statistical threshold. No periodogram, cross-correlation, or threshold on |dot M1 - dot M2| is used to define the classes. An objective metric would make the three-class diagnostic reproducible and would allow the reader to assess borderline cases, such as the 150-degree run with warping-induced oscillations. Please define and apply a quantitative classification, or provide the specific metric used to separate the classes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2] The text says the 45-degree model breaks at r ~ 2a, but later in the same section and in Fig. 6 the break is located at ~4a; please reconcile these values.
  2. [Equations (2) and (14)] There are LaTeX artifacts in the text: Eq. (14) contains a corrupted integral symbol ("/uni222B.dsp") and Eq. (2) is missing a period after "dimensions of velocity"; please clean these up.
  3. [Figure 8] The panels in Fig. 8 are small and the accretion-rate curves are difficult to read; a larger figure or separate panels with a common y-axis would make the claimed alternation pattern more visible.
  4. [Section 4.3] In the discussion of 2M1222-57, the text says simulations predict a dominant period of 5 Porb and then attributes the 5 Porb variability to inner-edge motion; please clarify which model is being compared to the observed period and why the 5 Porb modulation is expected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the accretion-pattern diagnostic is a direct simulation readout, not a fitted or definitional result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The paper's target result—whether preferential accretion onto an eccentric binary alternates as a function of initial disc tilt—is read directly from the SPH accretion-rate time series (Fig. 8), which are independent simulation outputs. The analytic formulas (Eq. 12 for the libration boundary and Eqs. 15–18 for alignment timescales) are used only to predict and interpret which alignment basin each initial tilt falls into and why the observed evolution proceeds on a given timescale; the accretion-pattern classification is not an input to those formulas, and no parameter is fitted to the accretion data and then renamed a prediction. Self-citations to Smallwood et al. (2019, 2022, 2023) supply context, a comparison polar-disc result, and resolution background, but they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification forbidding alternative interpretations. The paper's own admitted caveats—unresolved accreting streams (Section 4.2) and the coincidence between the break radius and the initial inner radius (Section 4.1)—are numerical and robustness limitations rather than demonstrations that any claimed result equals its input by construction. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the chosen hydrodynamic setup and on theoretical classification formulas from the literature. No new physical entity is introduced, and no parameter is fitted to the target result. The main burdens are resolution and initialization choices: unresolved streams and the coincidence of the break radius with the initial inner radius.

free parameters (8)
  • initial binary eccentricity e_b0 = 0.5
    Chosen to place the system in a regime with strong eccentric torque; changes critical tilt boundaries and whether discs break.
  • binary mass ratio M2/M1 = 1.0
    Chosen equal-mass; prior work shows preferential accretion depends on mass ratio, so the diagnostic may not transfer to unequal binaries.
  • Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity alpha_SS = 0.01
    Chosen as a typical protoplanetary disc viscosity; controls warp propagation, disc breaking, and alignment timescales.
  • disc aspect ratio H/R at inner edge = 0.1
    Puts the disc in the bending-wave regime and affects warp communication and breaking.
  • initial disc inner radius R_in = 4a
    Chosen to exceed tidal truncation; the break in the 45 and 135 degree runs occurs at about 4a, so this choice may set a key feature of the central claim.
  • sink accretion radius R_acc = 0.25a
    Chosen for computational speed; unresolved circumstellar discs and stream capture may affect accretion patterns.
  • initial angular momentum ratio J_d/J_b = 0.0106
    Derived from the setup; sets the critical tilts (about 38 and 142 degrees) that separate coplanar from polar behavior.
  • initial SPH particle number = 1e6
    Sets resolution; in breaking discs resolution drops near the cavity, and accretion streams are unresolved.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Critical tilt for circulation vs libration is given by Eq. 12 from Martin & Lubow 2019.
    Used to classify each run as coplanar prograde, polar, or retrograde before presenting accretion patterns.
  • domain assumption The disc is in the bending-wave regime because H/R > alpha_SS.
    Justifies treating warps as bending waves; invoked in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption The locally isothermal equation of state of Farris et al. 2014 captures the temperature structure.
    Affects sound speed distribution, warping, and precession; used in Eq. 2.
  • domain assumption Unresolved circumstellar discs and accretion streams at the sink scale do not change whether accretion alternates.
    The paper states streams are not well resolved but asserts the pattern is unaffected; Sections 2.1 and 4.2.
  • domain assumption Disc breaking at about 4a is a physical result rather than a consequence of choosing R_in = 4a.
    The break location coincides with the initial inner disc radius; the authors argue material flows inward and the break is physical, but no test with different R_in is shown.
  • standard math Alignment timescales are described by linear warp theory Eqs. 15-17.
    Used to explain why polar alignment is faster; not central to the accretion pattern claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Circumbinary accretion as a diagnostic for binary--disc misalignment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5RU7G34W

@misc{pith2026241210653,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Circumbinary accretion as a diagnostic for binary--disc misalignment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5RU7G34W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10653}
}
abstract

Binary star systems can accrete material originating from a circumbinary disc. Since it is common for the circumbinary disc to be tilted with respect to the binary orbital plane, we test whether the accretion dynamics can be a diagnostic for binary-disc misalignment. We present hydrodynamical simulations to model the accretion flow from a circumbinary disc around an eccentric binary with initial tilts ranging from $0^\circ$ to $180^\circ$ in increments of $15^\circ$. Based on the initial tilt, the circumbinary disc will align towards three different configurations: prograde coplanar, polar, or retrograde coplanar. For discs with initial tilts evolving towards prograde coplanar alignment, the accretion rates onto the primary and secondary stars exhibit alternating preferential accretion. Circumbinary discs evolving towards polar alignment exhibit no alternating preferential accretion onto the binary unless the initial tilt is close to the critical tilt that sets the boundary between coplanar or polar alignment. Such cases cause strong disc warping, leading to disc breaking. The inner disc becomes eccentric, leading to alternating preferential accretion onto the binary. As the break propagates outward, the disc tilt damps towards a polar state and the disc eccentricity decreases. As the disc re-circularizes, the accretion rate transitions back from alternating preferential accretion to non-alternating accretion. Lastly, no alternating preferential accretion exists for discs undergoing retrograde coplanar alignment. From the summary of the accretion rates from our suite of SPH simulations, it is evident that the accretion rate evolution can be affected by the initial tilt and subsequent evolution of the circumbinary disc.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10653 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left panel: The evolution of the tilt, , as a function of time in units of initial binary orbital period, orb. The colours denote the initial tilt of the circumbinary disc with greens evolving coplanar prograde, reds evolving polar, and blues evolving coplanar retrograde. Right panel: disc evolution in the cos – sin phase space. The black triangles represent = 0, Porb, with each triangle pointing in the direction of… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The ratio of the coplanar alignment timescale to the polar alignment timescale, c/p (from Eq. (18)), as a function of binary eccentricity. The blue curve represents c/p < 1 and the red curve represents p/c < 1. The black dot denotes when c/p = 1. 2018). The linear theory of warped discs describes the evolution of the warp in the regime of small inclination angles.Within the linear warp propagation theory, the warp i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The disc surface density Σ (upper subpanel), and eccentricity (lower subpanel), as a function of time in units of initial binary orbital period, orb, for different initial misalignment of the circumbinary disc (given by the titles). We show 15 contour levels of the surface density in the enlarged panel. The letters "C" or "P" denote whether the disc is undergoing coplanar or polar alignment, respectively. Note that … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The gas surface density for a circumbinary disc initially misaligned by 0 = 45◦ . The left sub-panel shows the – plane, viewing down on the binary orbit. The middle sub-panel denotes the – plane, which shows the initial misalignment between the disc and binary, and the…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The evolution of the surface density, Σ, tilt, , longitude of the ascending node, , and eccentricity, , as a function of radius, , for model of 0 = 45◦ during the disc-breaking stage. We show selected times beginning with = 800 Porb (black), 900 Porb (blue), 1000 Porb …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: presents a comprehensive 3D representation of the broken disc configuration for 0 = 45◦ during the time = 800, Porb. The upper panel shows the tilt of the disc with respect to the binary orbital plane, the middle panel illustrates the variation of the instantaneous dis…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The accretion rate, ¤ , as a function of time in units of binary orbital period, orb, for different initial misalignment of the circumbinary disc (given by the titles). The blue curves represent the primary accretion, while the red curves denote the secondary accretion…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Upper panel: the density-weighted average disc eccentricity as a function of time in binary orbital periods, Porb. Lower panel: the accretion rate, ¤ , onto a binary from a circumbinary disc initially misaligned by 0 = 45◦ with respect to the binary orbital plane as fu…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The average smoothing length per scale height, hℎi/, as a function of disc radius, for model of 0 = 45◦ . We show selected times be￾ginning with = 800 Porb (black), 900 Porb (blue), 1000 Porb (teal), 1100 Porb (green), 1200 Porb (yellow), and 1300 Porb (red). The peak…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322254 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...561A...2A 561, A2

    Alcal \'a J. M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322254 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...561A...2A 561, A2

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322254 2014

  3. [3]

    O., Caselli P., Girart J

    Alves F. O., Caselli P., Girart J. M., Segura-Cox D., Franco G. A. P., Schmiedeke A., Zhao B., 2019, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aaw3491 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Sci...366...90A 366, 90

    doi:10.1126/science.aaw3491 2019

  4. [4]

    Aly H., Lodato G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3633 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.3306A 492, 3306

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3633 2020

  5. [5]

    Ansdell M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab890 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...21A 859, 21

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab890 2018

  6. [6]

    H., 1994, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/173679 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...421..651A 421, 651

    Artymowicz P., Lubow S. H., 1994, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/173679 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...421..651A 421, 651

    doi:10.1086/173679 1994

  7. [7]

    H., 1996, @doi [ApJl] 10.1086/310200 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...467L..77A 467, L77

    Artymowicz P., Lubow S. H., 1996, @doi [ApJl] 10.1086/310200 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...467L..77A 467, L77

    doi:10.1086/310200 1996

  8. [8]

    R., Bonnell I

    Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/285.1.33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.285...33B 285, 33

    doi:10.1093/mnras/285.1.33 1997

Show all 110 references
  1. [9]

    R., Bonnell I

    Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Price N. M., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/277.2.362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995MNRAS.277..362B 277, 362

    1995 doi

  2. [10]

    R., Bonnell I

    Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Clarke C. J., Lubow S. H., Ogilvie G. I., Pringle J. E., Tout C. A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03648.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.317..773B 317, 773

    2000

  3. [11]

    R., Bonnell I

    Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Bromm V., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05775.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.336..705B 336, 705

    2002

  4. [12]

    Bell C. P. M., Mamajek E. E., Naylor T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454..593B 454, 593

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A.183B 658, A183

    Bohn A. J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A.183B 658, A183

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    Calvet N., Gullbring E., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...509..802C 509, 802

    1998 doi

  7. [15]

    L., Gordon K

    Calvet N., Muzerolle J., Brice \ n o C., Hern \'a ndez J., Hartmann L., Saucedo J. L., Gordon K. D., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422733 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128.1294C 128, 1294

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    Casassus S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/92 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...811...92C 811, 92

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1390 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514..906C 514, 906

    Ceppi S., Cuello N., Lodato G., Clarke C., Toci C., Price D. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1390 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514..906C 514, 906

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad444 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.5817C 520, 5817

    Ceppi S., Longarini C., Lodato G., Cuello N., Lubow S. H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad444 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.5817C 520, 5817

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Elsender D., Bate M

    Ceppi S., Cuello N., Lodato G., Longarini C., Price D. J., Elsender D., Bate M. R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348375 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A.104C 682, A104

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    M., Hillenbrand L

    Cody A. M., Hillenbrand L. A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/191/2/389 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJS..191..389C 191, 389

    2010 doi

  13. [21]

    Corporaal A., Kluska J., Van Winckel H., Bollen D., Kamath D., Min M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...650L..13C 650, L13

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Alexander R

    Cuadra J., Armitage P. J., Alexander R. D., Begelman M. C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14147.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.393.1423C 393, 1423

    2009

  15. [23]

    A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A.119C 628, A119

    Cuello N., Giuppone C. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A.119C 628, A119

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Jensen E

    Czekala I., Chiang E., Andrews S. M., Jensen E. L. N., Torres G., Wilner D. J., Stassun K. G., Macintosh B., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab287b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883...22C 883, 22

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    M., Espaillat C

    Czekala I., Ribas \'A ., Cuello N., Chiang E., Mac \' as E., Duch \^e ne G., Andrews S. M., Espaillat C. C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abebe3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912....6C 912, 6

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    J., Haiman Z., MacFadyen A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1787 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.2997D 436, 2997

    D'Orazio D. J., Haiman Z., MacFadyen A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1787 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.2997D 436, 2997

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    J., Duffell P

    D'Orazio D. J., Duffell P. C., Tiede C., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2403.05629 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240305629D p. arXiv:2403.05629

    2024 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    I., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.6078D 512, 6078

    Deng H., Ogilvie G. I., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.6078D 512, 6078

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv347 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1251D 449, 1251

    Do g an S., Nixon C., King A., Price D. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv347 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1251D 449, 1251

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    J., King A

    Do g an S., Nixon C. J., King A. R., Pringle J. E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty155 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.1519D 476, 1519

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    C., Nixon C

    Drewes N. C., Nixon C. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2609 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922..243D 922, 243

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    C., D'Orazio D., Derdzinski A., Haiman Z., MacFadyen A., Rosen A

    Duffell P. C., D'Orazio D., Derdzinski A., Haiman Z., MacFadyen A., Rosen A. L., Zrake J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abab95 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...901...25D 901, 25

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    C., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2402.13039 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240213039D p

    Duffell P. C., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2402.13039 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240213039D p. arXiv:2402.13039

    2024 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    C., Cuadra J., Dougados C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv284 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.3545D 448, 3545

    Dunhill A. C., Cuadra J., Dougados C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv284 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.3545D 448, 3545

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    Duquennoy A., Mayor M., 1991, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A

    1991

  28. [36]

    Facchini S., Juh \'a sz A., Lodato G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2523 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.4459F 473, 4459

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    W., Ogilvie G

    Fairbairn C. W., Ogilvie G. I., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2717 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.2426F 508, 2426

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    D., Duffell P., MacFadyen A

    Farris B. D., Duffell P., MacFadyen A. I., Haiman Z., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/134 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...783..134F 783, 134

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    H., Martin R

    Franchini A., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2fd8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880L..18F 880, L18

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Franchini A., Sesana A., Dotti M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2234 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.1458F 507, 1458

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    Franchini A., Lupi A., Sesana A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac63a2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929L..13F 929, L13

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Franchini A., Lupi A., Sesana A., Haiman Z., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.1569F 522, 1569

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    arXiv:2402.00938

    Franchini A., Prato A., Longarini C., Sesana A., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2402.00938 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240200938F p. arXiv:2402.00938

    2024 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gullbring E., Hartmann L., Brice \ n o C., Calvet N., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305032 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...492..323G 492, 323

    1998 doi

  37. [45]

    Hanawa T., Ochi Y., Ando K., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/485 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...708..485H 708, 485

    2010 doi

  38. [46]

    Hartmann L., Calvet N., Gullbring E., D'Alessio P., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305277 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...495..385H 495, 385

    1998 doi

  39. [47]

    M., Nixon C

    Heath R. M., Nixon C. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038548 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A..64H 641, A64

    2020 doi

  40. [48]

    F., Hernquist L., Cox T

    Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Di Matteo T., Robertson B., Springel V., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499298 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..163....1H 163, 1

    2006 doi

  41. [49]

    Hueso R., Guillot T., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041905 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...442..703H 442, 703

    2005 doi

  42. [50]

    Ingleby L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767..112I 767, 112

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    Jensen E. L. N., Dhital S., Stassun K. G., Patience J., Herbst W., Walter F. M., Simon M., Basri G., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/518408 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....134..241J 134, 241

    2007 doi

  44. [52]

    M., et al., 2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0667-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs...3..230K 3, 230

    Kennedy G. M., et al., 2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0667-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs...3..230K 3, 230

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    Kraus S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/835/1/L5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835L...5K 835, L5

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    Kraus S., et al., 2020, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aba4633 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Sci...369.1233K 369, 1233

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431.2673K 431, 2673

    Kurosawa R., Romanova M. M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431.2673K 431, 2673

    2013 doi

  48. [56]

    J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-022933 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ARA&A..61..517L 61, 517

    Lai D., Mu \ n oz D. J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-022933 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ARA&A..61..517L 61, 517

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    Li D., Zhou J.-L., Zhang H., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2181 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.3832L 437, 3832

    2014 doi

  50. [58]

    J., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16526.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405.1212L 405, 1212

    Lodato G., Price D. J., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16526.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405.1212L 405, 1212

    2010

  51. [59]

    E., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12332.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381.1287L 381, 1287

    Lodato G., Pringle J. E., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12332.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381.1287L 381, 1287

    2007

  52. [60]

    H., Artymowicz P., 2000, in Mannings V., Boss A

    Lubow S. H., Artymowicz P., 2000, in Mannings V., Boss A. P., Russell S. S., eds, Protostars and Planets IV. p. 731

    2000

  53. [61]

    H., Martin R

    Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2643 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.3733L 473, 3733

    2018 doi

  54. [62]

    H., Ogilvie G

    Lubow S. H., Ogilvie G. I., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309101 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...538..326L 538, 326

    2000 doi

  55. [63]

    H., Martin R

    Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., Nixon C., 2015, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/96 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800...96L 800, 96

    2015 doi

  56. [64]

    I., Milosavljevi \'c M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523869 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...672...83M 672, 83

    MacFadyen A. I., Milosavljevi \'c M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523869 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...672...83M 672, 83

    2008 doi

  57. [65]

    F., Robberto M., Da Rio N., Lodato G., Hillenbrand L

    Manara C. F., Robberto M., Da Rio N., Lodato G., Hillenbrand L. A., Stassun K. G., Soderblom D. R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...755..154M 755, 154

    2012 doi

  58. [66]

    F., Fedele D., Herczeg G

    Manara C. F., Fedele D., Herczeg G. J., Teixeira P. S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...585A.136M 585, A136

    2016 doi

  59. [67]

    F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630147 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A.127M 604, A127

    Manara C. F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630147 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A.127M 604, A127

    2017 doi

  60. [68]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/835/2/L28 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835L..28M 835, L28

    2017 doi

  61. [69]

    G., Lubow S

    Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2670 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.1332M 490, 1332

    2019 doi

  62. [70]

    Miranda R., Lai D., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1450 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.2396M 452, 2396

    2015 doi

  63. [71]

    J., Lai D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.1170M 466, 1170

    Miranda R., Mu \ n oz D. J., Lai D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.1170M 466, 1170

    2017 doi

  64. [72]

    J., Lai D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/43 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...43M 827, 43

    Mu \ n oz D. J., Lai D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/43 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...43M 827, 43

    2016 doi

  65. [73]

    J., Lithwick Y., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc74c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...905..106M 905, 106

    Mu \ n oz D. J., Lithwick Y., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc74c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...905..106M 905, 106

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    J., Miranda R., Lai D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871...84M 871, 84

    Mu \ n oz D. J., Miranda R., Lai D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871...84M 871, 84

    2019 doi

  67. [75]

    J., Lai D., Kratter K., Mirand a R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5d33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...889..114M 889, 114

    Mu \ n oz D. J., Lai D., Kratter K., Mirand a R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5d33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...889..114M 889, 114

    2020 doi

  68. [76]

    J., Nixon C

    Nealon R., Price D. J., Nixon C. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv014 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.1526N 448, 1526

    2015 doi

  69. [77]

    Nealon R., Ragusa E., Gerosa D., Rosotti G., Barbieri R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.5608N 509, 5608

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    J., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21072.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423.2597N 423, 2597

    Nixon C. J., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21072.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423.2597N 423, 2597

    2012

  71. [79]

    Nixon C., King A., Price D., 2013, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stt1136 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.1946N 434, 1946

    2013 doi

  72. [80]

    Ochi Y., Sugimoto K., Hanawa T., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428601 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...623..922O 623, 922

    2005 doi

  73. [81]

    Papaloizou J. C. B., Lin D. N. C., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175127 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...438..841P 438, 841

    1995 doi

  74. [82]

    Papaloizou J. C. B., Nelson R. P., Masset F., 2001, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361:20000011 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A

    2001 doi

  75. [83]

    J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2018.25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASA...35...31P 35, e031

    Price D. J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2018.25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASA...35...31P 35, e031

    2018 doi

  76. [84]

    G., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2310.00459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231000459R p

    Rabago I., Zhu Z., Lubow S., Martin R. G., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2310.00459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231000459R p. arXiv:2310.00459

    2023 doi arXiv

  77. [85]

    R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830....7R 830, 7

    Rafikov R. R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830....7R 830, 7

    2016 doi

  78. [86]

    J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.1243R 460, 1243

    Ragusa E., Lodato G., Price D. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.1243R 460, 1243

    2016 doi

  79. [87]

    J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.3362R 499, 3362

    Ragusa E., Alexander R., Calcino J., Hirsh K., Price D. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.3362R 499, 3362

    2020 doi

  80. [88]

    J., Do g an S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abdc24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...909...81R 909, 81

    Raj A., Nixon C. J., Do g an S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abdc24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...909...81R 909, 81

    2021 doi

  81. [89]

    M., Covino E., Stelzer B., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219832 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...548A..56R 548, A56

    Rigliaco E., Natta A., Testi L., Randich S., Alcal \`a J. M., Covino E., Stelzer B., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219832 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...548A..56R 548, A56

    2012 doi

  82. [90]

    Roedig C., Sesana A., Dotti M., Cuadra J., Amaro-Seoane P., Haardt F., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219986 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...545A.127R 545, A127

    2012 doi

  83. [91]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, A&A, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A

    1973

  84. [92]

    H., Lubow S

    Shi J.-M., Krolik J. H., Lubow S. H., Hawley J. F., 2012, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/118 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...749..118S 749, 118

    2012 doi

  85. [93]

    J., Hernquist L., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.5059S 518, 5059

    Siwek M., Weinberger R., Mu \ n oz D. J., Hernquist L., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.5059S 518, 5059

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    L., Lubow S

    Smallwood J. L., Lubow S. H., Franchini A., Martin R. G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz994 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.2919S 486, 2919

    2019 doi

  87. [95]

    L., Franchini A., Chen C., Becerril E., Lubow S

    Smallwood J. L., Franchini A., Chen C., Becerril E., Lubow S. H., Yang C.-C., Martin R. G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa654 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..487S 494, 487

    2020 doi

  88. [96]

    L., Nealon R., Chen C., Martin R

    Smallwood J. L., Nealon R., Chen C., Martin R. G., Bi J., Dong R., Pinte C., 2021a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2624 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508..392S 508, 392

    doi

  89. [97]

    L., Martin R

    Smallwood J. L., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2021b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abd4d6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...907L..14S 907, L14

    doi

  90. [98]

    L., Lubow S

    Smallwood J. L., Lubow S. H., Martin R. G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.1249S 514, 1249

    2022 doi

  91. [99]

    L., Martin R

    Smallwood J. L., Martin R. G., Lubow S. H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.2952S 520, 2952

    2023 doi

  92. [100]

    G., Torres G., Kounkel M., Feliz D

    Stassun K. G., Torres G., Kounkel M., Feliz D. L., Bouma L. G., Howell S. B., Gnilka C. L., Furlan E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aca32e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...941..125S 941, 125

    2022 doi

  93. [101]

    Thun D., Kley W., Picogna G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730666 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A.102T 604, A102

    2017 doi

  94. [102]

    Tiede C., Zrake J., MacFadyen A., Haiman Z., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aba432 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...900...43T 900, 43

    2020 doi

  95. [103]

    M., Mathieu R

    Tofflemire B. M., Mathieu R. D., Johns-Krull C. M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab4f7d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..245T 158, 245

    2019 doi

  96. [104]

    A., Basri G., Johns C

    Valenti J. A., Basri G., Johns C. M., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116783 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993AJ....106.2024V 106, 2024

    1993 doi

  97. [105]

    Venuti L., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423776 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...570A..82V 570, A82

    2014 doi

  98. [106]

    Vernet J., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...536A.105V 536, A105

    2011 doi

  99. [107]

    J., Ghez A

    White R. J., Ghez A. M., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321542 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...556..265W 556, 265

    2001 doi

  100. [108]

    K., Stevenson S., Nixon C

    Young A. K., Stevenson S., Nixon C. J., Rice K., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.2616Y 525, 2616

    2023 doi

  101. [109]

    Zhu Z., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.4221Z 483, 4221

    2019 doi

  102. [110]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.