Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The road ahead of Horndeski: cosmology of surviving scalar-tensor theories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.10521 v1 pith:5YDZBZS2 submitted 2018-10-24 astro-ph.CO

The road ahead of Horndeski: cosmology of surviving scalar-tensor theories

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords sigmaconstraintsdarkfunctionsenergyfieldhorndeskilimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the context of the effective field theory of dark energy (EFT) we perform agnostic explorations of Horndeski gravity. We choose two parametrizations for the free EFT functions, namely a power law and a dark energy density-like behaviour on a non trivial Chevallier-Polarski-Linder background. We restrict our analysis to those EFT functions which do not modify the speed of propagation of gravitational waves. Among those, we prove that one specific function cannot be constrained by data, since its contribution to the observables is below the cosmic variance, although we show it has a relevant role in defining the viable parameter space. We place constraints on the parameters of these models combining measurements from present day cosmological datasets and we prove that the next generation galaxy surveys can improve such constraints by one order of magnitude. We then verify the validity of the quasi-static limit within the sound horizon of the dark field, by looking at the phenomenological functions $\mu$ and $\Sigma$, associated respectively to clustering and lensing potentials. Furthermore, we notice up to $5\%$ deviations in $\mu, \Sigma$ with respect to General Relativity at scales smaller than the Compton one. For the chosen parametrizations and in the quasi-static limit, future constraints on $\mu$ and $\Sigma$ can reach the $1\%$ level and will allow us to discriminate between certain models at more than $3\sigma$, provided the present best-fit values remain.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How deep can a cosmic void be? Voids-informed theoretical bounds in Galileon gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Galileon models must obey a void-depth limit tied to expansion history to avoid force breakdowns, excluding ~60% of a linear parameterization's space by z less than or equal to 10.

  2. Cosmic voids evolution in modified gravity via hydrodynamics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Voids in luminal Galileon gravity are always unscreened, and a reality requirement on the fifth force rules out ~82% of the favored parameter space, yielding a redshift-dependent minimum void depth.

  3. Primordial black hole dark matter from ultra-slow-roll inflation in Horndeski gravity

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0

    A kinetic cubic Horndeski coupling creates an ultra-slow-roll phase that amplifies curvature perturbations enough to produce asteroid-mass primordial black holes, potentially 90% of dark matter.