REVIEW 2 cited by
Gravitational-wave signatures from reheating
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We initiate a study of the gravitational-wave signatures of a phase transition that occurs as the Universe's temperature increases during reheating. The gravitational-wave signatures of such a heating phase transition are different from those of a cooling phase transition, and their detection could allow us to probe reheating. In the lucky case that the gravitational-wave signatures from both the heating and cooling phase transitions were to be observed, information about reheating could in principle be obtained utilizing the correlations between the two transitions. Frictional effects, leading to a constant bubble-wall speed in one case, will instead behave as an ``antifriction'' force in the other and accelerate the bubble wall. This antifriction will often take the bubble into a runaway regime, significantly enhancing the amplitude of the heating phase transition gravitational-wave signal. The efficiency, strength, and duration of the phase transitions will be similarly correlated in a reheating-dependent way.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Gravitational wave signatures of primordial black hole accretion during early matter domination
PBHs that form in a radiation era and accrete during an early matter era could produce a two-peak GW background detectable by LISA or BBO for asteroid-mass PBHs as all of dark matter.
-
Primordial Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions during Reheating
Phase transitions happening during reheating can produce gravitational-wave signals that are delayed, prolonged, and shifted in amplitude and frequency by orders of magnitude compared with standard cosmology.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.