Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

Observational Signatures of Dust Traffic Jams in Polar-Aligning Circumbinary Disks

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dust traffic jams produced during polar alignment create grain-size-dependent rings that SKA and ngVLA can resolve.

desk verdict A genuinely useful prediction for SKA/ngVLA, but the Stokes numbers in the text don't match the stated surface density — a factor-of-100 typo that needs fixing before the cm-detectability claim is credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12614 v1 pith:6CQUZLEO submitted 2024-11-19 astro-ph.EP

Jeremy L. Smallwood , Rebecca Nealon , Hsi-Wei Yen , Christophe Pinte , Cristiano Longarini , Hossam Aly , Min-Kai Lin This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords circumbinarydisksdusttrafficjamspolaralignmentStokesnumbersyntheticobservationscentimeter-wavelengthinterferometryradiativetransferprotoplanetary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that when a misaligned circumbinary disk precesses toward polar alignment with the binary's orbit, the gas and dust do not move as one: differential precession makes grains pile up at locations where their velocity relative to the gas is locally minimized. These 'dust traffic jams' form at radii set by each grain's Stokes number, so a single disk develops several concentric rings, each holding a different grain size. Using a 3D hydrodynamical simulation with dust sizes from 0.7 to 3.7 cm, the authors post-process the density structure with radiative transfer and show that the traffic jams appear as distinct rings in synthetic centimeter-wavelength images. They conclude that SKA and ngVLA have the angular resolution to resolve these rings, turning dust traffic jams into a direct observational probe of grain size and growth in protoplanetary disks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dust traffic jam: a local enhancement of dust surface density that forms where the relative velocity between the dust and gas, projected onto the gas motion, is minimized during differential precession. The amount of decoupling is set by the Stokes number, $\mathrm{St}=\frac{\pi}{2}\frac{\rho_d\,s}{\Sigma_g}$, with $\rho_d$ the intrinsic grain density, $s$ the grain size, and $\Sigma_g$ the gas surface density. Because $\mathrm{St}$ grows with grain size, smaller grains stay more coupled and drift inward faster during polar alignment, so each dust species collects into its own ring at a radius determined by its $\mathrm{St}$. The radiative-transfer step turns these density rings into continuum rings and gives a spectral index map, which is how the mechanism is connected to observations.

What would settle it

Image a known polar-aligning circumbinary disk with SKA and ngVLA at 0.6 cm and 2.4 cm: if the ring peaks appear at identical radii at both wavelengths, or if no ring peaks appear at all despite the simulated disk parameters, the dust-traffic-jam prediction fails. A single measurement showing grain-size-independent ring positions would rule out the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that dust traffic jams from differential precession during polar alignment produce observable, grain-size-stratified rings in circumbinary disks, and that the ring radii carry a clean readout of the dust Stokes number. In the simulation, dust species with sizes 0.7, 1.2, 2.1, and 3.7 cm (Stokes numbers from roughly 6 to 140) all start near 65 au and then drift inward at size-dependent rates, splitting into separate rings with smaller grains ending up closer to the binary. Synthetic observations at 0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 cm show multiple flux peaks at the ring locations, with an inner optically thick region washing out the smallest-grain rings and the largest grains producing spiral structure at the longest wavelength. The paper concludes that ngVLA and SKA, with sub-0.03 arcsecond resolution, can resolve the ring widths, whereas current ALMA resolution cannot.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that real polar-aligning circumbinary disks contain centimeter-sized grains, with Stokes numbers well above unity, in a low-mass gas disk; if the grains are smaller or the gas surface density is higher, the dust stays coupled to the gas and differential precession will not carve multiple rings.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Multi-wavelength cm imaging of one polar disk should reveal several concentric rings, with shorter wavelengths tracing smaller grains at smaller radii.
  • The measured ring radii, together with the Stokes number relation, give a direct constraint on the dust size distribution and its radial stratification.
  • ngVLA and SKA are required to test the prediction: their beams are small enough to resolve ring widths, while standard ALMA resolution is not.
  • Ring positions that shift with wavelength distinguish dust traffic jams from pressure-bump, planet, or MHD-zonal-flow rings, which sit at grain-size-independent radii.
  • Even grains near the lower end of the mechanism, St ~ 1, should form traffic jams, so the prediction can in principle be extended to smaller grains and shorter wavelengths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit is that the same differential-precession mechanism should operate in any circumbinary disk undergoing nodal precession, not only systems that reach exact polar alignment, so moderately misaligned disks may already show wavelength-dependent rings.
  • A natural extension would replace the four discrete dust species with a continuous size distribution; the prediction would become a smooth radial progression of ring spacing and spectral index that a single multi-wavelength observation could fit.
  • If centimeter-sized grains are rare in real polar disks, the strongest signal may instead appear at shorter wavelengths for St ~ 1 grains; ALMA could then search for faint multi-ring structure in HD 98800B before the cm facilities come online.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper presents a 3D smoothed-particle hydrodynamic simulation of a low-mass circumbinary disk around an eccentric equal-mass binary, initially tilted at 60 degrees, with four dust species of centimeter-sized grains. During polar alignment, differential precession between gas and dust produces dust traffic jams whose radial locations depend on Stokes number. The authors post-process the simulation with the radiative-transfer code mcfost to produce synthetic continuum images at 0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 cm, finding multiple rings and a spectral index map. They conclude that upcoming SKA and ngVLA observations will be able to resolve these rings, making dust traffic jams prime targets for centimeter-wavelength observations.

Significance. If the parameter inconsistencies and missing sensitivity analysis are fixed, the paper would provide a useful observational diagnostic for dust size distributions in misaligned circumbinary disks, and it would motivate high-resolution centimeter-wavelength observations. The hydrodynamic and radiative-transfer pipeline is standard and the ring radii emerge from the simulation rather than being imposed, which is a genuine strength. The predicted flux scales and wavelength-dependent ring structure are concrete enough to be tested by future facilities, provided the underlying model parameters are unambiguously specified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eqs. (1)-(3), (10)] Section 2.1 states a surface-density normalization of Sigma0 = 6e-3 g/cm^2 in Eq. (3), a disk mass of Md = 1e-3 Msun, and Stokes numbers of about 6-27 for 0.7 cm grains between r_in = 40 au and r_out = 120 au. These statements are mutually inconsistent. Substituting the printed Sigma0 into Eq. (1) with rho_d = 3 g/cm^3 gives St ~ 550 at r_in and St ~ 2900 at r_out for s = 0.7 cm, not ~6-27. Conversely, the quoted Stokes numbers require Sigma0 ~ 0.6 g/cm^2, which is what Eq. (10) yields for the stated Md, p = 3/2, and x_out = 3. Because the traffic-jam radii scale with St and the paper's cm-detectability argument assumes St ~ 6-140, the manuscript does not uniquely specify the simulated model. Please correct the surface-density normalization (or the disk mass and Stokes numbers) and state precisely which value was used in the simulation.
  2. [Section 4 and abstract] The abstract and Section 4 claim that SKA and ngVLA 'will be sufficient to detect' and resolve the dust traffic jams, but the only quantitative support is beam-size overlays (bottom panel of Fig. 4) and total flux values quoted in the text. No sensitivity calculation, integration time, or noise level is presented; the synthetic images are not convolved with the quoted beams and no detection significance is derived. For a claim in the abstract, the authors should either add an SNR estimate using realistic SKA/ngVLA sensitivities (e.g., following Ilee et al. 2020) or soften the claim to 'if detected, the rings could be resolved at these angular resolutions.'
  3. [Section 5, Eqs. (9)-(10)] The simulation adopts dust grain sizes of 0.7-3.7 cm, corresponding to St ~ 6-140, without a model for grain growth. The paper states that St ~ 1 is a lower limit for dust-ring formation, but observational grain-size distributions in protoplanetary disks often peak at mm sizes or below. If the typical grains in polar-aligning disks have St < 1, the traffic-jam rings may be significantly weaker or absent, directly affecting the predicted cm-wavelength morphology. The authors should discuss this dependence explicitly, for instance by estimating the ring contrast for St ~ 0.1-1, or by stating clearly that the predictions are conditional on the presence of cm-sized grains.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 2.1] The grain-size list 's = 0.7, 1.2, 2.1, 3.7, cm' contains an extra comma after 3.7.
  2. [Section 5] The expression 'St /greaterorsimilar15' is garbled and appears inconsistent with Section 2.1, where the simulation's St values begin around 6; please use the standard '≳' symbol and clarify the range.
  3. [Section 5] The text refers to 'Janksy VLA'; this should be 'Jansky VLA'.
  4. [Acknowledgments] The funding string 'Marie Sk/suppress lodowska-Curie' contains corrupted text and should be corrected.
  5. [References] The reference list shows Smallwood et al. (2020a) and (2020b) with identical titles, volume, pages, and DOI; please verify the two entries.
  6. [General] The manuscript mixes 'disc' and 'disk' throughout; please unify the spelling.
  7. [Title] The title contains a spurious space in 'T raffic'; it should read 'Traffic'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ring positions and synthetic images are genuine simulation outputs, and the self-cited traffic-jam mechanism is reproduced by the paper's own hydrodynamical simulation.

full rationale

The central claim is that differential precession between gas and dust during polar alignment produces grain-size-dependent dust traffic jams observable at cm wavelengths. This claim is not circular: the multiple ring radii emerge from the SPH simulation (Figs. 1-2), and the synthetic continuum images and spectral index maps are computed from the simulated density structure using the radiative transfer code mcfost, with no parameter fitted to the claimed ring locations. The Stokes numbers quoted in Section 2.1 are input parameters derived from Eq. (1) using chosen grain sizes and the disk surface density profile, not outputs used to fit the rings. The toy model in Section 5 (Eqs. 9-10 and Fig. 5) extrapolates a St ~ 1 detection limit across p, M_d, and x_out without tuning to the simulated ring positions; the simulation-based region is only overlaid as a visual guide. The paper frequently cites the authors' own submitted works, Smallwood et al. (2024a,b), for the traffic-jam mechanism, but this self-citation is not load-bearing: the mechanism is also supported by the published works Aly & Lodato (2020), Longarini et al. (2021), and Aly et al. (2021), and the current simulation independently reproduces the dust rings it attributes to that mechanism. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known observational result is merely renamed. One genuine but non-circular problem is an internal numerical inconsistency in Section 2.1: Eq. (3) states Sigma0 = 6e-3 g/cm^2, which combined with Eq. (1) would give St(0.7 cm, r_in) ~ 550 rather than the quoted ~6-27, whereas the stated disk mass M_d = 1e-3 M_sun and Eq. (10) imply Sigma0 ~ 0.6 g/cm^2. This inconsistency does not make the derivation circular, but it should be corrected because the claimed cm-wavelength observability depends on the mapping between grain size and Stokes number.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on hand-picked initial parameters (dust sizes, tilt, disk mass, viscosity, density profile) and on modeling assumptions inherited from cited works. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • dust grain sizes = 0.7, 1.2, 2.1, 3.7 cm
    Hand-picked to give Stokes numbers ~6-140; the predicted ring radii and wavelength-dependent visibility depend directly on this choice (Section 2.1).
  • initial disk tilt = 60 degrees
    Set above the polar-alignment threshold icrit~38 deg; precession history and traffic-jam evolution depend on it (Section 2.1).
  • initial disk mass = 10^-3 Msun
    Low mass justifies ignoring self-gravity and fixes the gas surface density that enters the Stokes number (Section 2.1).
  • Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity alpha_SS = 0.01
    Controls gas evolution and dust-gas coupling; affects ring formation and drift timescales (Section 2.1).
  • surface density power-law index p = 3/2
    Initial radial profile for gas and dust; used in Eq. (3) and in the toy model Eq. (10) (Section 2.1).
  • sound speed power-law index q = 3/4
    Sets disk aspect ratio profile; chosen to give uniform resolution, affects disk structure (Section 2.1, Eq. 4).
  • dust-to-gas mass ratio = 0.01
    Initial abundance of solids; sets dust surface density and optical depth in the radiative transfer (Section 2.1).
  • binary separation and eccentricity = a_b = 16.5 au, e_b = 0.8
    Chosen to resemble 99 Her; sets binary torque and the polar-alignment condition (Section 2.1).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Differential precession between gas and dust produces dust traffic jams.
    The mechanism is taken from prior work (Aly & Lodato 2020; Longarini et al. 2021; Aly et al. 2021; Smallwood et al. 2024a,b), not derived in this paper; it is the basis for interpreting the rings (Section 3).
  • domain assumption Two-fluid approximation with drag but no gas-dust thermal coupling is valid for low gas density and St>1.
    Cited to Laibe & Price (2012), invoked in Section 2.1 to justify the simulation method.
  • standard math Critical tilt for polar alignment follows Eq. (2) from Martin & Lubow (2019b).
    Used to choose i0=60 deg above icrit~38 deg; accepted analytic result from cited literature (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption Disk self-gravity is negligible.
    Ignored because Md=1e-3 Msun; affects precession torque balance if wrong (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption Radiative transfer assumptions (astrosilicate Mie opacities, Siess isochrone stellar spectra, no viscous heating, optically thin treatment beyond 3 smoothing lengths) determine the synthetic fluxes.
    Described in Section 2.2; these choices set the temperature and emergent intensity.
  • ad hoc to paper St~1 is a lower limit for dust-ring formation.
    The toy model in Section 5 assumes this to extend ring formation to smaller grains; the simulations only probe St>~6, so this is an extrapolation, not a derived result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observational Signatures of Dust Traffic Jams in Polar-Aligning Circumbinary Disks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6CQUZLEO

@misc{pith2026241112614,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observational Signatures of Dust Traffic Jams in Polar-Aligning Circumbinary Disks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6CQUZLEO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12614}
}
read the original abstract

Misaligned circumbinary disks will produce dust traffic jams during alignment or anti-alignment to the binary orbital plane. We conduct a hydrodynamical simulation of an initially misaligned circumbinary disk undergoing polar alignment with multiple dust species. Due to differential precession between the gas and dust components, multiple dust traffic jams are produced within the disk during polar alignment. The radial locations of the dust traffic jams depend on the Stokes number of the grains, which depends on grain size. We compute the dust temperature structure using post-processing radiative transfer to produce continuum images at cm-wavelengths. Multiple distinct rings emerge in the continuum images, corresponding to the dust traffic jams. The angular resolution of upcoming observations from SKA and ngVLA will be sufficient to detect centimeter-sized grains in protoplanetary disks and resolve the widths of dust traffic jams. Therefore, dust traffic jams resulting from the differential precession of gas and dust in misaligned circumbinary disks will be a prime target for more extended wavelength observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12614 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The dust structure of a nearly polar dusty circumbinary disk with multiple dust species. The center image shows the circumbinary disk represented by all dust species. Each dust species is individually rendered and shown in the smaller panels: s = 0.7 cm, s = 1.2 cm, s = 2.1 cm, and s = 3.7 cm. All panels view the disk in the y-z plane at 1000 Porb. The color denotes the dust surface density. The differential precess… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top panel: the density weighted average of the disc inclination for the gas (black) and dust components, s = 0.7 cm (blue), s = 1.2 cm (red), s = 2.1 cm (green), and s = 3.7 cm (purple). Bottom panel: the azimuthally-averaged dust surface density, Σd, as a function disk radius, r, and time in binary orbital periods, Porb. The colorbar denotes the dust surface density. The multiple dust rings are labeled by grain siz… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The dust continuum emission at wavelengths 0.6 cm (top-left), 1.2 cm (top-right), and 2.4 cm (bottom-left). Bottom￾right panel: the spectral index, α, of the dust continuum emission at wavelengths of 0.6 cm and 2.4 cm, which reveals differences in the dust structure at different grain sizes. The emission from the two stars are also shown. The estimated beam size for ALMA at ∼ 40, GHz (yellow) is shown in the lower-l… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Upper left panel: the azimuthally-averaged flux density, I, as a function of distance from the image center from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The size of St ∼ 1 dust particles as a function of radius r evaluated for different values of the surface density radial profile p, with the disk mass Md = 0.01 (top row), and for different values of Md, with p = 1 (bottom row). Each column represents a different value…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dust Growth in Binary Systems: Inhibition of dust settling and growth in circumbinary discs

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Dust grains in circumbinary discs end up five times smaller than in single-star discs, and the conditions for streaming-instability clumping are not met, arguing against in-situ planet formation there.

  2. Circumstellar and circumbinary discs in multiple stellar systems

    astro-ph.EP 2025-01 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    This review consolidates current knowledge on how stellar multiplicity shapes protoplanetary disc structure, dust evolution, and planet formation outcomes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 65, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv128

    Aly, H., Dehnen, W., Nixon, C., & King, A. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 65, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv128

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv128 2015

  2. [2]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 2743, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2794

    Aly, H., Gonzalez, J.-F., Nealon, R., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 2743, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2794

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2794 2021

  3. [3]

    2020, MNRAS, 3252, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3633

    Aly, H., & Lodato, G. 2020, MNRAS, 3252, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3633

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3633 2020

  4. [4]

    M., Huang, J., P´ erez, L

    Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., P´ erez, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L41, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2018

  5. [5]

    Artymowicz, P., & Lubow, S. H. 1994, ApJ, 421, 651, doi: 10.1086/173679

    doi:10.1086/173679 1994

  6. [6]

    2016, MNRAS, 458, 3927, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2527

    Baruteau, C., & Zhu, Z. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3927, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2527

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2527 2016

  7. [7]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.12699, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.12699

    Braun, R., Bonaldi, A., Bourke, T., Keane, E., & Wagg, J. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.12699, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.12699

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.12699 2019

  8. [8]

    A., Keane, E., & Wagg, J

    Braun, R., Bourke, T., Green, J. A., Keane, E., & Wagg, J. 2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 174, doi: 10.22323/1.215.0174

    doi:10.22323/1.215.0174 2015

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    2015, A&A, 580, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525998 Carrasco-Gonz´ alez, C., Sierra, A., Flock, M., et al

    Camps, P., Misselt, K., Bianchi, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525998 Carrasco-Gonz´ alez, C., Sierra, A., Flock, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3d33

    2015 doi

  2. [10]

    C., & Martin, R

    Childs, A. C., & Martin, R. G. 2021, ApJL, 920, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2957

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    M., et al

    Czekala, I., Chiang, E., Andrews, S. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab287b

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    R., & Stone, J

    Dong, R., Zhu, Z., Rafikov, R. R., & Stone, J. M. 2015, ApJL, 809, L5, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/809/1/L5

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    T., & Lee, H

    Draine, B. T., & Lee, H. M. 1984, ApJ, 285, 89, doi: 10.1086/162480

    1984 doi

  6. [14]

    P., & Monnier, J

    Dullemond, C. P., & Monnier, J. D. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 205, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130932

    2010 doi

  7. [15]

    1991, A&A, 248, 485

    Duquennoy, A., & Mayor, M. 1991, A&A, 248, 485

    1991

  8. [16]

    2016, A&A, 588, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527516

    Guidi, G., Tazzari, M., Testi, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527516

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    M., Dullemond, C

    Huang, J., Andrews, S. M., Dullemond, C. P., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf740

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    D., Hall, C., Walsh, C., et al

    Ilee, J. D., Hall, C., Walsh, C., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 5116, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2699

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    M., Wyatt, M

    Kennedy, G. M., Wyatt, M. C., Sibthorpe, B., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2264, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20448.x

    2012

  12. [20]

    M., Matr` a, L., Facchini, S., et al

    Kennedy, G. M., Matr` a, L., Facchini, S., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 230, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0667-x

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Laibe, G., & Price, D. J. 2012a, MNRAS, 420, 2345, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20202.x —. 2012b, MNRAS, 420, 2365, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20201.x

    2011

  14. [22]

    2015, A&A, 582, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526734

    Lesur, G., Hennebelle, P., & Fromang, S. 2015, A&A, 582, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526734

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 4930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab843

    Longarini, C., Lodato, G., Toci, C., & Aly, H. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 4930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab843

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    H., & Martin, R

    Lubow, S. H., & Martin, R. G. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 3733, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2643

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    G., & Lubow, S

    Martin, R. G., & Lubow, S. H. 2017, ApJL, 835, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/835/2/L28 —. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 1297, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1648 —. 2019a, arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.11631 —. 2019b, MNRAS, 490, 1332, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2670

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    G., Lubow, S

    Martin, R. G., Lubow, S. H., Vallet, D., Anugu, N., & Gies, D. R. 2023, ApJL, 957, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0730

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    2011, arXiv e-prints

    Mayor, M., Marmier, M., Lovis, C., et al. 2011, arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2497

    2011 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Monaghan, J. J. 1989, Journal of Computational Physics, 82, 1, doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(89)90032-6

    1989 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Bolatto, A., Chatterjee, S., et al

    Murphy, E. J., Bolatto, A., Chatterjee, S., et al. 2018, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 517, Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array, ed. E. Murphy, 3, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1810.07524

    2018 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 4951, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz346

    Dipierro, G. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 4951, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz346

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    J., & Nixon, C

    Nealon, R., Price, D. J., & Nixon, C. J. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv014 12

    2015 doi

  24. [32]

    2013, MNRAS, 434, 1946, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1136 P´ erez, L

    Nixon, C., King, A., & Price, D. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 1946, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1136 P´ erez, L. M., Chandler, C. J., Isella, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 813, 41, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/41

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Min, M., et al

    Pinte, C., Harries, T. J., Min, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, 967, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811555

    2009 doi

  26. [34]

    2006, A&A, 459, 797, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053275

    Pinte, C., M´ enard, F., Duchˆ ene, G., & Bastien, P. 2006, A&A, 459, 797, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053275

    2006 doi

  27. [35]

    J., Wurster, J., Tricco, T

    Price, D. J., Wurster, J., Tricco, T. S., et al. 2018, PASA, 35, e031, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2018.25

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    A., Henry, T

    Raghavan, D., McAlister, H. A., Henry, T. J., et al. 2010, ApJS, 190, 1, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1

    2010 doi

  29. [37]

    P., Juhasz, A., Booth, R

    Rosotti, G. P., Juhasz, A., Booth, R. A., & Clarke, C. J. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 2790, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw691

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    J., Murphy, E

    Selina, R. J., Murphy, E. J., McKinnon, M., et al. 2018, Ground-based and airborne telescopes VII, 10700, 497

    2018

  31. [39]

    I., & Sunyaev, R

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    1973

  32. [40]

    2000, A&A, 358, 593, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0003477

    Siess, L., Dufour, E., & Forestini, M. 2000, A&A, 358, 593, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0003477

    2000 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    L., Franchini, A., Chen, C., et al

    Smallwood, J. L., Franchini, A., Chen, C., et al. 2020a, MNRAS, 494, 487, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa654 —. 2020b, MNRAS, 494, 487, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa654

    doi

  34. [42]

    L., Lubow, S

    Smallwood, J. L., Lubow, S. H., Franchini, A., & Martin, R. G. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2919, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz994

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    S., Li, Z.-Y., Krasnopolsky, R., & Shang, H

    Suriano, S. S., Li, Z.-Y., Krasnopolsky, R., & Shang, H. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1239, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty717

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    2016, A&A, 588, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527423

    Tazzari, M., Testi, L., Ercolano, B., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527423

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    2014a, AJ, 147, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/86 —

    Tokovinin, A. 2014a, AJ, 147, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/86 —. 2014b, AJ, 147, 87, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/87

    doi

  38. [46]

    2023, A&A, 675, A176, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346253

    Ueda, T., Okuzumi, S., Kataoka, A., & Flock, M. 2023, A&A, 675, A176, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346253

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57, doi: 10.1093/mnras/180.1.57

    1977 doi

  40. [48]

    Whipple, F. L. 1972, in From Plasma to Planet, ed. A. Elvius, 211

    1972

  41. [49]

    P., & Cieza, L

    Williams, J. P., & Cieza, L. A. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 67, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102548

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.04754

    Wu, Y., Liu, S.-F., Jiang, H., & Nayakshin, S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.04754. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04754

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    J., & Lai, D

    Zanazzi, J. J., & Lai, D. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 603, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2375

    2018 doi

  44. [52]

    orcid-ID.png

    Calvet, N. 2011, ApJ, 729, 47, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/47 This figure "orcid-ID.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/2411.12614v1

    2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.