Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 66 references

Hodge Dual Gauge Symmetry in Minimal Einstein-Aether Theory

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Minimal Einstein-aether theory is classically identical, through Hodge duality, to the 3-form gauge formulation of the cosmological constant, and divergence-free aether fields are pure gauge.

desk verdict The Hodge-dual dictionary is genuine and the algebra is clean, but the 'pure gauge' theorem only holds for the unconstrained version, and the paper needs to say so. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12641 v2 pith:6MHNBBZJ submitted 2025-04-17 gr-qc hep-th

Kamal Hajian This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83D0553C8058A14 PACS 04.50.Kd11.15.-q
keywords Einstein-aethertheoryminimalHodgeduality3-formgaugefieldcosmologicalconstantasconservedchargepuresolutionsLorentzinvarianceviolation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that 'minimal Einstein-aether theory'—the version with only one nonzero coupling $c_2$ and with the timelike-normalization constraint on the aether switched off—is not a separate gravitational theory but a known one in disguise. The aether one-form $u$ is identified with the 3-form gauge potential $A$ of the cosmological-constant gauge theory through $A = \star u/\sqrt{2}$, and under this map the Lagrangians and field equations of the two models agree algebraically. That lets solutions of the well-studied gauge formulation, such as Kerr-Newman-anti de Sitter spacetimes, be carried over to the aether theory by Hodge duality, and conversely. The paper also proves that any divergence-free aether field has vanishing field strength in the dual description and is therefore a pure gauge, so proposed aether solutions of this type add nothing beyond the bare metric. If the claim is right, the minimal aether theory contains exactly the dynamics of Einstein gravity with a cosmological constant, with $\Lambda$ emerging as an integration constant rather than a fundamental parameter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Hodge star operator—the map sending a $p$-form to a $(4-p)$-form in four dimensions—together with the coderivative identity $d(\star u)=-\star(\nabla_{\alpha}u^{\alpha})$ for an arbitrary 1-form $u$. The map $A=\star u/\sqrt{2}$ converts the top-form field strength $F=dA$ into the aether divergence, and two off-shell identities, $F^2=-(\nabla\cdot u)^2/2$ and $F_{\mu\mu_2\mu_3\mu_4}F_{\nu}^{\mu_2\mu_3\mu_4}=-3(\nabla\cdot u)^2g_{\mu\nu}$, turn the gauge action into the minimal Einstein-aether action term by term. The pure-gauge theorem is carried by the Poincaré lemma: a vanishing field strength makes the 3-form potential locally exact.

What would settle it

Take a vacuum spacetime with nontrivial third de Rham cohomology, for example a flat Lorentzian $S^1\times T^3$, and let $A$ be the pullback of the volume form of the $T^3$ factor; $A$ is closed but not exact. Its Hodge dual $u=\sqrt{2}\,\star A$ is divergence-free and satisfies the minimal field equations, yet no 2-form $\alpha$ exists with $A=d\alpha$ globally. If this configuration is accepted as a solution, the theorem's statement that divergence-free aether fields are 'necessarily pure gauge' is false as stated; only a local version survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On a four-dimensional Lorentzian manifold with signature $(-,+,+,+)$, the map $A=\star u/\sqrt{2}$ identifies the 3-form gauge potential $A_{\mu_1\mu_2\mu_3}$ with the Hodge dual of the aether one-form $u_{\mu}$. With the coupling scaled so that $c_2=\mp 1$, the gauge kinetic term satisfies $F^2=-(\nabla_{\alpha}u^{\alpha})^2/2$, and the field equations of the two theories coincide: the minimal Einstein-aether equations become the gauge-theory equations, with the cosmological constant given on-shell by $\Lambda=-c_2(\nabla_{\alpha}u^{\alpha})^2/2$ (up to sign). Consequently, case II of the minimal Einstein-aether theory ($\lambda=0$ off-shell, no unit-timelike constraint) is the gauge formulation of the cosmological constant in different variables. The paper's theorem adds that whenever $\nabla_{\alpha}u^{\alpha}=0$, the dual field strength vanishes, so by the Poincaré lemma the 3-form potential is locally $A=d\alpha$; such divergence-free aether configurations are pure gauge and carry no gravitational effect.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument rests on the unconstrained version of the theory in which the aether field is not required to be unit timelike, and the pure-gauge conclusion also relies on the local Poincaré lemma, so it silently assumes trivial spacetime topology.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every solution of the 3-form gauge formulation of the cosmological constant, including the (A)dS-Kerr-Newman family, becomes a solution of the minimal Einstein-aether theory by taking $u=\sqrt{2}\,\star A$; the paper works out this transfer explicitly.
  • Any proposed aether solution with $\nabla_{\alpha}u^{\alpha}=0$, such as the Kerr aether of Ref. [50], is classically indistinguishable from the same metric without an aether, because the dual potential is locally $A=d\alpha$ and the field strength vanishes.
  • The cosmological constant in the dual description is not put in by hand but arises as an integration constant tied to the global part of the 3-form gauge symmetry.
  • If the equivalence holds, case II minimal Einstein-aether has no dynamics beyond Einstein gravity with a cosmological constant, so observational limits on $c_2$ constrain the single combination $\Lambda_0+\Lambda$ appearing in the field equations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One extension the author leaves implicit: the pure-gauge theorem is local, since the Poincaré lemma applies only locally; on a spacetime with $H^3\neq 0$ such as a flat Lorentzian $S^1\times T^3$, a divergence-free aether can be Hodge-dual to a closed but not exact 3-form, so 'pure gauge' holds only up to topology.
  • The duality suggests a cheap diagnostic for other proposed aether solutions: compute the Hodge-dual field strength; any configuration with $F=0$ should be treated as a flat connection and checked for global holonomy before being taken as new physics.
  • Since the same Hodge-star construction works in any dimension with a vector dual to a $(D-1)$-form, a parallel equivalence should hold between Einstein-aether-like vector theories and $(D-1)$-form gauge theories; checking it would show whether the result is special to four-dimensional top forms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims an equivalence between minimal Einstein-aether theory in the specific case labeled (II) of Sec. 2.1 (lambda=0 off-shell, no unit-timelike constraint on u) and the 3-form gauge-field formulation of the cosmological constant. The map A = star u / sqrt(2) is used to show that the Lagrangian (12) coincides with the gauge Lagrangian (21) via the off-shell identity F^2 = -(div u)^2/2, and that the field equations (13)-(14) coincide with (22)-(23) via (34). The paper then transfers the Kerr-Newman-(anti-)de Sitter solution from the gauge formulation to the aether theory, and in Sec. 4.2 it claims that divergence-free aether fields, including a Kerr solution from Ref. [50], are pure-gauge and non-physical, with a theorem to this effect.

Significance. The algebraic core of the paper is clean and useful if it is restricted to the unconstrained case (II). The Hodge-dual map is explicit, the identities (33)-(34) are verified in closed form, and the solution-transfer exercise in Sec. 4.1 works as stated for that unconstrained theory. This gives a genuine bridge between an old gauge formulation of the cosmological constant and a vector-tensor gravity model. However, the advertised physical conclusion about standard constrained minimal Einstein-aether theory is not established. The theorem in Sec. 4.2 drops the u^2 = -1 constraint, and the gauge transformation used to remove A does not stay in the constrained configuration space. These issues affect the central application of the paper and require correction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.2 / Theorem; Sec. 2.1, cases (II) and (III)] The theorem that a divergence-free aether field is necessarily a pure gauge and non-physical is established only for case (II), where lambda=0 off-shell and u is not required to satisfy u^2=-1. The gauge transformation A -> A + d(alpha) of the 3-form theory corresponds to shifting u by the Hodge dual of d(alpha), i.e. u -> u + sqrt(2) star d(alpha); this shift generically changes u^2 and does not preserve the unit-timelike constraint that defines the constrained reduced Einstein-aether theory (case III) and the Ref. [50] solution. In particular, transforming the closed A of Eq. (68) to zero sends u to zero, which is outside the constrained configuration space. The proof also uses Eq. (15) to identify div u = 0 with Lambda = 0, and Eq. (15) is adopted in case (II); this identification does not carry over to the constrained theory. Therefore the claim that the Ref. [50] Kerr solution is physically trivial as a solution of minimal Einstein-aether in the sense of Refs. [49,50] is not justified by the duality argument.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, proof of the theorem] The proof invokes the Poincare lemma to pass from dA = 0 to A = d(alpha). The Poincare lemma guarantees only local exactness. On a spacetime with nonzero third de Rham cohomology, a closed 3-form need not be exact, so the conclusion 'pure gauge and non-physical' is at best local unless a topological assumption such as H^3(M)=0 is stated. The theorem should either be restricted to contractible or topologically trivial spacetimes, or reformulated as a statement about local pure-gauge structure with a separate discussion of global degrees of freedom.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (60)] The transferred vector field obtained from the Kerr-Newman-(A)dS solution is spacelike and does not satisfy u^2 = -1; the text should state explicitly that the 'minimal Einstein-aether formulation' in Eqs. (61)-(63) refers to case (II), not to the constrained theory of Refs. [49,50].
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (60) and (66)] The index placement is inconsistent: Eq. (60) writes the Hodge dual as u_mu while Eq. (66) uses u^mu; the author should clarify whether covariant or contravariant components are intended in each expression.
  3. [References] Reference [48] is cited with arXiv:2309.07634, which appears to be the identifier of Ref. [47]; the correct identifier for the Withers paper should be checked. Reference [15] also appears to reuse the arXiv identifier of Ref. [12].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Hodge-dual map is an explicit algebraic equivalence, and cited prior gauge-formulation results are independent background; remaining caveats concern theorem scope, not circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a direct algebraic dictionary, not a circular construction. With A = *u/√2 (Eq. 32), the author computes F² = -(∇·u)²/2 (Eq. 33) and the field-strength product in Eq. (34), so the Lagrangian (12) and field equations (13)-(14) become the 3-form gauge Lagrangian (21) and equations (22)-(23) term by term. This is an explicit equivalence proof: no parameter is fitted to the target result, and the target statement ('the two models are dual') is not assumed in the ansatz; the map is the definition of the duality, and the equivalence is then verified. The applications also do not reduce to inputs: the Kerr-Newman example imports a genuine known solution from the gauge formulation, and the 'pure gauge' theorem follows from Λ=0 -> F=0 (Eqs. 24,26), then dA=0 -> A=dα by the Poincaré lemma. The constancy of the top-form field-strength scalar, cited to the author's earlier work [46], is a standard parameter-free fact with stated assumptions that do not include this paper's conclusions; likewise the charge formulas and solution-phase-space background from [45-47,58,59,68] are not used to force the paper's claims. The only caveat is scope, not circularity: the theorem is proven for the unconstrained case (II) because the gauge shift u -> u + √2 * dα does not preserve u²=-1; and Poincaré exactness is local. These are validity limitations of the theorem, not a renaming of inputs into conclusions. Thus no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new entities. Its central claim rests on known background structure: the Einstein-aether action, the 3-form gauge formulation of the cosmological constant, the constancy of the 4-form field strength, and the Poincare lemma. The only nonstandard premise is the definition of the minimal theory as the unconstrained case (II), which is necessary for the duality and for the pure-gauge classification.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Einstein-aether action (Eq. 4) with c1=c3=c4=0 and the field equations (Eqs. 7-8) describe the reduced/minimal theory.
    The paper adopts the standard Einstein-aether framework and its equations as the starting point; the reduction to c2-only is the theory under study (Sec. 2.1).
  • domain assumption The 3-form gauge field formulation of the cosmological constant, including the generic solution F = phi epsilon with phi constant, is valid (Eqs. 21-26).
    The equivalence imports this known formulation and its on-shell solution from Refs. [39-46] without re-deriving the generic constancy of phi.
  • standard math The coderivative identity d(star u) = -star(nabla.u) holds for arbitrary 1-forms with the paper's signature and Levi-Civita conventions.
    This identity is used in the key off-shell relations (Eqs. 33-34 and 40).
  • standard math The Poincare lemma: every closed form is locally exact.
    Used in the theorem to conclude A = d(alpha) from F = dA = 0; the lemma is local only, which is the source of the global-topology caveat.
  • ad hoc to paper Case (II), with lambda = 0 off-shell and u not constrained to be unit timelike, is taken as the definition of minimal Einstein-aether for the duality.
    The paper explicitly chooses case (II) rather than the constrained case (III) used in Ref. [49]; the duality and the pure-gauge interpretation depend on this choice.
  • domain assumption In the minimal action (Eq. 12), the aether enters only through its divergence nabla.u, so shifts by divergence-free vectors are symmetries.
    This is the fact that makes a pure gauge in the dual theory correspond to a physically trivial aether configuration.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hodge Dual Gauge Symmetry in Minimal Einstein-Aether Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6MHNBBZJ

@misc{pith2026250412641,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hodge Dual Gauge Symmetry in Minimal Einstein-Aether Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6MHNBBZJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12641}
}
read the original abstract

Einstein-aether gravity is a theory that breaks the local Lorentz symmetry by introducing a preferred direction via a vector field, which is considered to play the role of an aether. The theory is identified by four coupling constants between the aether and gravity. Minimal Einstein-aether is the special case in which only one of the couplings is non-zero. We show that the aether vector field in its minimal version is Hodge dual to a gauge field. The gauge symmetry in the dual description has been known for decades and has been used to implement a cosmological constant into the Lagrangian. As a result, solutions to the well-established gauge theory can be transferred into the minimal Einstein-aether theory straightforwardly. On the other hand, some of the proposed solutions to the minimal Einstein-aether theory could be discarded as pure gauges of the vanishing aether. We prove as a theorem that this holds true for all divergence-less aether fields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [50]

    Kerr Black Hole in Einstein--\AE{}ther Gravity

    E. Franzin, S. Liberati and J. Mazza, “Kerr black hole in Einstein–æther gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.8, 8 (2024), [arXiv:2312.06891]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Gravity with a dynamical p referred frame,

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, “Gravity with a dynamical p referred frame,” Phys. Rev. D 64, 024028 (2001), [arXiv:gr-qc/0007031]

    arXiv 2001

  3. [2]

    Jacobson, Einstein-Aether gravity: a status report, Proc

    T. Jacobson, Einstein-Aether gravity: a status report, Proc. Sci. QG-PH (2007), 020. [arXiv:0801.1547]

    arXiv 2007

  4. [3]

    Undoing the twist: The Hoˇ rava limit of Ein stein-aether theory,

    T. Jacobson, “Undoing the twist: The Hoˇ rava limit of Ein stein-aether theory,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 081501 (2014), [arXiv:1310.5115]

    arXiv 2014

  5. [4]

    Modern tests of Lorentz invariance,

    D. Mattingly, “Modern tests of Lorentz invariance,” Liv ing Rev. Rel. 8, 5 (2005), [arXiv:gr-qc/0502097]

    arXiv 2005

  6. [5]

    Tests of Lorentz invariance: a 2013 update ,

    S. Liberati, “Tests of Lorentz invariance: a 2013 update ,” Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 133001 (2013), [arXiv:1304.5795]

    arXiv 2013

  7. [6]

    Einstein-aether gravity: Theory and obse rvational constraints,

    T. Jacobson, “Einstein-aether gravity: Theory and obse rvational constraints,” [arXiv:0711.3822]

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    Constraints on Einste in-aether theory after GW170817,

    J. Oost, S. Mukohyama and A. Wang, “Constraints on Einste in-aether theory after GW170817,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no.12, 124023 (2018), [arXiv:1802.04303]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 66 references
  1. [8]

    Post-Newtonian parameter s and constraints on Einstein- aether theory,

    B. Z. Foster and T. Jacobson, “Post-Newtonian parameter s and constraints on Einstein- aether theory,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 064015 (2006), [arXiv:gr-qc/0509083]

    2006 arXiv

  2. [9]

    New binary pulsar constraints on Einstein-æther theory af ter GW170817,

    T. Gupta, M. Herrero-Valea, D. Blas, E. Barausse, N. Corn ish, K. Yagi and N. Yunes, “New binary pulsar constraints on Einstein-æther theory af ter GW170817,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, no.19, 195003 (2021), [arXiv:2104.04596]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Constraining t he new Aether: Gravitational Cerenkov radiation,

    J. W. Elliott, G. D. Moore and H. Stoica, “Constraining t he new Aether: Gravitational Cerenkov radiation,” JHEP 08, 066 (2005), [arXiv:hep-ph/0505211]

    2005 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Rotat ing black holes in Einstein- aether theory,

    A. Adam, P. Figueras, T. Jacobson and T. Wiseman, “Rotat ing black holes in Einstein- aether theory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 39, no.12, 125001 (2022), [arXiv:2108.00005]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Static Spherically Symmetric Sol ution of the Einstein-aether Theory,

    C. Gao and Y. G. Shen, “Static Spherically Symmetric Sol ution of the Einstein-aether Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 103508 (2013), [arXiv:1301.7122]. 12

    2013 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Black hole s in Einstein-aether and Horava- Lifshitz gravity,

    E. Barausse, T. Jacobson and T. P. Sotiriou, “Black hole s in Einstein-aether and Horava- Lifshitz gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 83, 124043 (2011), [arXiv:1104.2889]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Generic features of Einstei n-Aether black holes,

    T. Tamaki and U. Miyamoto, “Generic features of Einstei n-Aether black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 024026 (2008), [arXiv:1507.06618]

    2008 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Numerical simul ations of gravitational collapse in Einstein-aether theory,

    D. Garfinkle, C. Eling and T. Jacobson, “Numerical simul ations of gravitational collapse in Einstein-aether theory,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 024003 (2007), [arXiv:gr-qc/0703093]

    2007 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Black Holes in Einstein-Aeth er Theory,

    C. Eling and T. Jacobson, “Black Holes in Einstein-Aeth er Theory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 5643-5660 (2006), [erratum: Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 049802 (2010)] [arXiv:gr-qc/0604088]

    2006 arXiv

  10. [18]

    S pherically symmetric static black holes in Einstein-aether theory,

    C. Zhang, X. Zhao, K. Lin, S. Zhang, W. Zhao and A. Wang, “S pherically symmetric static black holes in Einstein-aether theory,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.6, 064043 (2020), [arXiv:2004.06155]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    G¨ odel-type metrics in Einstein-Aether theory II: nonflat back- ground in arbitrary dimensions,

    M. G¨ urses and C ¸ . S ¸ent¨ urk, “G¨ odel-type metrics in Einstein-Aether theory II: nonflat back- ground in arbitrary dimensions,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 48, no.5, 63 (2016), [arXiv:1512.02028]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Stability of the aether,

    W. Donnelly and T. Jacobson, “Stability of the aether,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 081501 (2010), [arXiv:1008.4351]

    2010 arXiv

  13. [21]

    In stabilities in the Aether,

    S. M. Carroll, T. R. Dulaney, M. I. Gresham and H. Tam, “In stabilities in the Aether,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 065011 (2009), [arXiv:0812.1049]

    2009 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Odd-parity stability of black holes in Einstein-aether gravity,

    S. Tsujikawa, C. Zhang, X. Zhao and A. Wang, “Odd-parity stability of black holes in Einstein-aether gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.6, 064024 (2021), [arXiv:2107.08061]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Growth of structure in theories with a dynamical preferred frame,

    T. G. Zlosnik, P. G. Ferreira and G. D. Starkman, “Growth of structure in theories with a dynamical preferred frame,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 084010 (2008), [arXiv:0711.0520]

    2008 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Lorentz-violating vector fi elds slow the universe down,

    S. M. Carroll and E. A. Lim, “Lorentz-violating vector fi elds slow the universe down,” Phys. Rev. D 70, 123525 (2004), [arXiv:hep-th/0407149]

    2004 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Vector field models of modified gravity and the dark sector,

    J. Zuntz, T. G. Zlosnik, F. Bourliot, P. G. Ferreira and G . D. Starkman, “Vector field models of modified gravity and the dark sector,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 104015 (2010), [arXiv:1002.0849]

    2010 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Modify ing gravity with the Aether: An alternative to Dark Matter,

    T. G. Zlosnik, P. G. Ferreira and G. D. Starkman, “Modify ing gravity with the Aether: An alternative to Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 75, 044017 (2007), [arXiv:astro-ph/0607411]

    2007 arXiv

  19. [27]

    The Einstein–Maxwell-ae ther-axion theory: Dynamo- optical anomaly in the electromagnetic response,

    T. Y. Alpin and A. B. Balakin, “The Einstein–Maxwell-ae ther-axion theory: Dynamo- optical anomaly in the electromagnetic response,” Int. J. M od. Phys. D 25, no.04, 1650048 (2016), [arXiv:1511.05766]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Einstein-aether theor y with a Maxwell field: General formalism,

    A. B. Balakin and J. P. S. Lemos, “Einstein-aether theor y with a Maxwell field: General formalism,” Annals Phys. 350, 454-484 (2014), [arXiv:1407.6014]

    2014 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Generalized Einstein- Aether theories and the Solar System,

    C. Bonvin, R. Durrer, P. G. Ferreira, G. Starkman and T. G . Zlosnik, “Generalized Einstein- Aether theories and the Solar System,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 024037 (2008), [arXiv:0707.3519]

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A Modified Gravity Theory: Null Aether,

    M. G¨ urses and C ¸ . S ¸ent¨ urk, “A Modified Gravity Theory: Null Aether,” Commun. Theor. Phys. 71, no.3, 312-326 (2019), [arXiv:1604.02266]. 13

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Æther Field, Casimir Energy and Stabilization of The Extra Dimension,

    A. Chatrabhuti, P. Patcharamaneepakorn and P. Wongjun , “Æther Field, Casimir Energy and Stabilization of The Extra Dimension,” JHEP 08, 019 (2009), [arXiv:0905.0328]

    2009 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Aether Compactification,

    S. M. Carroll and H. Tam, “Aether Compactification,” Phy s. Rev. D 78, 044047 (2008), [arXiv:0802.0521]

    2008 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Imprints of a P rimordial Preferred Direction on the Microwave Background,

    L. Ackerman, S. M. Carroll and M. B. Wise, “Imprints of a P rimordial Preferred Direction on the Microwave Background,” Phys. Rev. D 75, 083502 (2007), [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 80, 069901 (2009)] [arXiv:astro-ph/0701357]

    2007 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgem einen Relativit¨ atstheorie,

    A. Einstein, “Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgem einen Relativit¨ atstheorie,” Sitzungs- berichte der K¨ oniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wissensc haften (Berlin), Seite 142-152, (1917)

    1917

  27. [35]

    Measureme nts of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae,

    S. Perlmutter et al. [Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration], “Measureme nts of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae,” Astroph ys. J. 517, 565 (1999), [arXiv:astro-ph/9812133]

    1999 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Observational evidence from sup ernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,

    A. G. Riess et al. [Supernova Search Team], “Observational evidence from sup ernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998), [arXiv:astro-ph/9805201]

    1998 arXiv

  29. [37]

    The Large N limit of superconformal fie ld theories and supergrav- ity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal fie ld theories and supergrav- ity,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999), [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998)] [arXiv:hep-th/9711200]

    1999 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Central Charges in the Cano nical Realization of Asymp- totic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravi ty,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Cano nical Realization of Asymp- totic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravi ty,” Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 207 (1986)

    1986

  31. [39]

    Hidden Const ants: The Theta Parameter of QCD and the Cosmological Constant of N=8 Supergravity,

    A. Aurilia, H. Nicolai and P. K. Townsend, “Hidden Const ants: The Theta Parameter of QCD and the Cosmological Constant of N=8 Supergravity,” Nuc l. Phys. B 176, 509 (1980)

    1980

  32. [40]

    Quantum Inequivale nce of Different Field Repre- sentations,

    M. J. Duff and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Quantum Inequivale nce of Different Field Repre- sentations,” Phys. Lett. 94B, 179 (1980)

    1980

  33. [41]

    The Cosmological Const ant As A Canonical Variable,

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, “The Cosmological Const ant As A Canonical Variable,” Phys. Lett. 143B, 415 (1984)

    1984

  34. [42]

    Asymptotically anti-D e Sitter Spaces,

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, “Asymptotically anti-D e Sitter Spaces,” Commun. Math. Phys. 98 (1985), 391-424

    1985

  35. [43]

    The Cosmological Constant As A Thermod ynamic Black Hole Parameter,

    C. Teitelboim, “The Cosmological Constant As A Thermod ynamic Black Hole Parameter,” Phys. Lett. 158B, 293 (1985)

    1985

  36. [44]

    The Cosmological Const ant and General Covariance,

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, “The Cosmological Const ant and General Covariance,” Phys. Lett. B 222, 195 (1989)

    1989

  37. [45]

    Cosmological constant i s a conserved charge,

    D. Chernyavsky and K. Hajian, “Cosmological constant i s a conserved charge,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35, no. 12, 125012 (2018) [arXiv:1710.07904]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    First law of black hole thermodynami cs and Smarr formula with a cosmological constant,

    K. Hajian, H. ¨Oz¸ sahin and B. Tekin, “First law of black hole thermodynami cs and Smarr formula with a cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.4, 044024 (2021), [arXiv:2103.10983]. 14

    2021 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Einstein-aether as a quantum effective field theory,

    B. Withers, “Einstein-aether as a quantum effective field theory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 225009 (2009), [arXiv:2309.07634]

    2009 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Minimal Einstein-Aether theory,

    M. G¨ urses, C ¸ . S ¸ent¨ urk and B. Tekin, “Minimal Einstein-Aether theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.9, 945 (2024), [arXiv:2402.07068]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [51]

    Local symmetries and constraints ,

    J. Lee and R. M. Wald, “Local symmetries and constraints ,” J. Math. Phys., 31, 725–743, (1990)

    1990

  42. [52]

    Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,

    R. M. Wald, “Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,” P hys. Rev. D, 48, 3427–3431, (1993), [arXiv:gr-qc/9307038]

    1993 arXiv

  43. [53]

    Some properties of Noether charg e and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, “Some properties of Noether charg e and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,” Phys. Rev. D, 50, 846–864, (1994), [arXiv:gr-qc/9403028]

    1994 arXiv

  44. [54]

    A General definition of ’conser ved quantities’ in general relativ- ity and other theories of gravity,

    R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas, “A General definition of ’conser ved quantities’ in general relativ- ity and other theories of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D, 61, 084027, (2000), [arXiv:gr-qc/9911095]

    2000 arXiv

  45. [55]

    Phase space form ulation of general relativity without a 3+1 splitting,

    A. Ashtekar, L. Bombelli, and R. Koul, “Phase space form ulation of general relativity without a 3+1 splitting,” Lect. Notes Phys., 278, 356–359, (1987)

    1987

  46. [56]

    The covariant p hase space of asymptotically flat gravitational fields,

    A. Ashtekar, L. Bombelli, and O. Reula, “The covariant p hase space of asymptotically flat gravitational fields,” In M. Francaviglia (ed.), Mechan ics, Analysis and Geometry: 200 Years after Lagrange, 417-450, (1990)

    1990

  47. [57]

    Covariant Description Of Ca nonical Formalism In Geometrical Theories,

    C. Crnkovic and E. Witten, “Covariant Description Of Ca nonical Formalism In Geometrical Theories,” In Hawking, S.W. (ed.), Israel, W. (ed.): Three h undred years of gravitation, 676-684, (1987)

    1987

  48. [58]

    Solution Phase Spa ce and Conserved Charges: A General Formulation for Charges Associated with Exact Symm etries,

    K. Hajian and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Solution Phase Spa ce and Conserved Charges: A General Formulation for Charges Associated with Exact Symm etries,” Phys. Rev. D 93, no.4, 044074 (2016), [arXiv:1512.05584]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [59]

    On Thermodynamics and Phase Space of Near Ho rizon Extremal Geometries,

    K. Hajian, “On Thermodynamics and Phase Space of Near Ho rizon Extremal Geometries,” Ph.D thesis, (2015), [arXiv:1508.03494]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [60]

    Four Forms and the Vanishi ng of the Cosmological Constant,

    M. J. Duncan and L. G. Jensen, “Four Forms and the Vanishi ng of the Cosmological Constant,” Nucl. Phys. B 336, 100 (1990)

    1990

  51. [61]

    The Cosmological Constant is Probably Zero, an d a Proof is Possibly Right,

    Zh. Wu, “The Cosmological Constant is Probably Zero, an d a Proof is Possibly Right,” Phys.Lett. B659 (2008) 891-893, [arXiv:0709.3314]

    2008 arXiv

  52. [62]

    Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,

    Roy P. Kerr. “Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,” Phys.Rev.Lett., 11:237–238, 1963

    1963

  53. [63]

    Note on the Kerr spinning pa rticle metric,

    E.T. Newman and A.I. Janis. “Note on the Kerr spinning pa rticle metric,” J.Math.Phys., 6:915–917, 1965. 15

    1965

  54. [64]

    Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass,

    E T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Praka sh, and R. Torrence, “Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass,” J.Math.Phys., 6:918–919, 196 5

  55. [65]

    Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separabl e solutions of Einstein’s equations,

    B. Carter. “Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separabl e solutions of Einstein’s equations,” Commun.Math.Phys., 10:280, 1968

    1968

  56. [66]

    The commutation property of a stationary, a xisymmetric system,

    B. Carter, “The commutation property of a stationary, a xisymmetric system,” Commun. Math. Phys., 17, 233–238, (1970)

    1970

  57. [67]

    Carter; in: C

    B. Carter; in: C. DeWitt, BS DeWitt (Eds.), Les Astre Occ lus, Proceedings of 1972 Les Houches Summer School (2nd ed.), Gordon and Breach, New York (1973)

    1973

  58. [68]

    Conserved charges and first law of thermodyn amics for Kerr–de Sitter black holes,

    K. Hajian, “Conserved charges and first law of thermodyn amics for Kerr–de Sitter black holes,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 48, no. 8, 114 (2016), [arXiv:1602.05575]. 16

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.