REVIEW 3 cited by
Quantum Neural Networks: A Comparative Analysis and Noise Robustness Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, hybrid quantum neural networks (HQNNs) offer a promising solution, combining the strengths of classical machine learning with quantum computing capabilities. However, the performance of these networks can be significantly affected by the quantum noise inherent in NISQ devices. In this paper, we conduct an extensive comparative analysis of various HQNN algorithms, namely Quantum Convolution Neural Network (QCNN), Quanvolutional Neural Network (QuanNN), and Quantum Transfer Learning (QTL), for image classification tasks. We evaluate the performance of each algorithm across quantum circuits with different entangling structures, variations in layer count, and optimal placement in the architecture. Subsequently, we select the highest-performing architectures and assess their robustness against noise influence by introducing quantum gate noise through Phase Flip, Bit Flip, Phase Damping, Amplitude Damping, and the Depolarizing Channel. Our results reveal that the top-performing models exhibit varying resilience to different noise gates. However, in most scenarios, the QuanNN demonstrates greater robustness across various quantum noise channels, consistently outperforming other models. This highlights the importance of tailoring model selection to specific noise environments in NISQ devices.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Q-SafeML: Safety Assessment of Quantum Machine Learning via Quantum Distance Metrics
Q-SafeML applies quantum distance metrics, such as trace distance and fidelity, to compare correct and incorrect predictions of quantum classifiers, offering a way to flag unsafe or unreliable QML behavior.
-
CircuitHunt: Automated Quantum Circuit Screening for Superior Credit-Card Fraud Detection
CircuitHunt screens KetGPT circuits with qubit/parameter filters and 5-epoch macro-F1 scoring, selecting circuit #221 (6 qubits, 9 parameters) that reportedly hits 97% accuracy, but SMOTE-before-split inflates the tes...
-
QuantEIT: Ultra-Lightweight Quantum-Assisted Inference for Chest Electrical Impedance Tomography
Two 2-qubit circuits plus one linear layer reconstruct EIT lung images without training data, using roughly 0.2% of baseline parameters, with competitive accuracy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.