Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hybrid Finite Difference with the Physics-informed Neural Network for solving PDE in complex geometries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.07926 v1 pith:6Q4IWPWP submitted 2022-02-16 physics.comp-ph

classification physics.comp-ph
keywords differencefinitecomplexdomainmethodequationhfd-pinnhybrid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The physics-informed neural network (PINN) is effective in solving the partial differential equation (PDE) by capturing the physics constraints as a part of the training loss function through the Automatic Differentiation (AD). This study proposes the hybrid finite difference with the physics-informed neural network (HFD-PINN) to fully use the domain knowledge. The main idea is to use the finite difference method (FDM) locally instead of AD in the framework of PINN. In particular, we use AD at complex boundaries and the FDM in other domains. The hybrid learning model shows promising results in experiments. To use the FDM locally in the complex boundary domain and avoid the generation of background mesh, we propose the HFD-PINN-sdf method, which locally uses the finite difference scheme at random points. In addition, the signed distance function is used to avoid the difference scheme from crossing the domain boundary. In this paper, we demonstrate the performance of our proposed methods and compare the results with the different number of collocation points for the Poisson equation, Burgers equation. We also chose several different finite difference schemes, including the compact finite difference method (CDM) and crank-nicolson method (CNM), to verify the robustness of HFD-PINN. We take the heat conduction problem and the heat transfer problem on the irregular domain as examples to demonstrate the efficacy of our framework. In summary, HFD-PINN, especially HFD-PINN-sdf, are more instructive and efficient, significantly when solving PDEs in complex geometries.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Derivative Computation in PINNs: Automatic Differentiation, Finite Differences and Beyond

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    With a carefully chosen step size, finite-difference derivatives match automatic differentiation in accuracy and beat it in speed and memory for MLP-based physics-informed neural networks.

Pith tools