Design and analysis of a set of discrete variable protocols for secure quantum communication

Arindam Dutta

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 296 references

Design and analysis of a set of discrete variable protocols for secure quantum communication

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This thesis proposes two QKD protocols that run on commercial photon sources and claims they beat SARG04 in efficiency and PNS critical distance while staying secure against named attacks.

desk verdict A thesis compilation whose QIA survey is genuinely useful, but the QKD security claims rest on an undefined parameter δ and a wobbly probability table. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06380 v1 pith:75M6E2YX submitted 2025-08-08 quant-ph

Arindam Dutta This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph MSC 81P9491A10 PACS 03.67.Dd

keywords quantumkeydistributionidentityauthenticationphoton-number-splittingattackBellstatescontrolledagreementNashequilibriumsecuredirectcommunicationdiscrete-variableprotocols

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The thesis argues that quantum communication can be made more practical by shifting more of the burden from classical announcements onto quantum resources. Its central contribution is a pair of QKD protocols that avoid the need for ideal single-photon sources, using instead weaker and commercially available photon states, and that are claimed to be secure against intercept-resend, photon-number-splitting, and a stated class of collective attacks. The thesis derives key-rate bounds in which a new variable raises the tolerable error threshold, and it computes critical distances under photon-number-splitting attacks that exceed those of BB84 and SARG04. Around this core, it also contributes Bell-state quantum identity authentication schemes, a controlled quantum key agreement protocol that does not require quantum memory, and a game-theoretic QBER bound for the DL04 quantum secure direct communication protocol.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the information-partitioning split: the transmitted information is divided between a classical announcement and a quantum state, and the new QKD protocols reduce the classical announcement relative to SARG04 while encoding more in two-particle quantum correlations. The formal expression of this claim is the key-rate bound in which the new variable δ raises the tolerable error threshold. For the QIA schemes, the central objects are Bell-state correlations and the key-to-Pauli mapping (00→I, 01→X, 10→iY, 11→Z), reinforced by decoy sequences; for the CQKA protocol, the mechanism is a one-way channel using Bell and single-photon states; for the game-theoretic result, mi

What would settle it

Construct a collective attack outside the named menu, for example Eve storing all signals in a quantum memory and performing a joint measurement after sifting, or entangling her probes across multiple signals, and compute Eve's accessible information against Protocol 3.1 or 3.2. If her information exceeds the claimed bound while Bob's observed QBER stays below the tolerable threshold, the restricted-adversary assumption is violated and the security claim fails as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the efficiency and resilience of QKD can be improved by reducing the classical component of the information split and increasing the quantum component. The two proposed protocols, 3.1 and 3.2, use two-particle encoding rather than ideal single photons, and the thesis proves security against intercept-resend, PNS, IRUD, and specific collective attacks. It establishes key-rate bounds showing that a new variable, δ, raises the tolerable QBER, and it reports that the protocols achieve higher efficiency than SARG04 at the cost of using more quantum resources. For the authentication part, the thesis presents controlled QIA protocols based on Bell states and Pauli operatio

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that Eve's power is limited to the attack menu named in the proofs—intercept-resend, photon-number splitting, unambiguous discrimination, and collective attacks with independent errors—so the claimed key-rate and QBER thresholds do not follow for a general adversary.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

QKD could be implemented with the kind of attenuated laser sources already available commercially, rather than requiring ideal single-photon sources.
The proposed protocols would offer higher sifted-key efficiency than SARG04 while resisting PNS attacks, so they could be a practical alternative in lossy channels.
The critical distance under PNS attacks would exceed both BB84 and SARG04 under comparable conditions, extending the usable range of secure key distribution.
Classical pre-processing with the new variable δ would allow the key rate to remain positive at higher error rates, improving noise tolerance.
The controlled QKA protocol would remove the quantum-memory requirement that impedes many existing key-agreement schemes, making them easier to realize with current technology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: the security claims rest on a restricted attack menu; if the same two-particle encoding were analyzed under fully general coherent attacks, the improved δ threshold might or might not survive, and that analysis is the natural next check.
Editorial extension: because the thesis treats δ as a given parameter rather than optimizing it, treating δ as a free variable and scanning it against QBER would produce a practical operating curve for the protocols.
Editorial extension: the Bell-state entanglement-swapping pattern used in the controlled QIA protocol could be adapted into a device-independent authentication test, since it already relies on Bell correlations, though the thesis does not take that step.
Editorial extension: the game-theoretic method for bounding QBER in DL04 could be transferred to other two-way quantum secure direct communication protocols, giving a unified way to set error thresholds, but the thesis applies it only to DL04.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, this is not a single new research paper; it's a PhD thesis compilation where Chapters 2–5 are the author's own published papers, restated. Second, the part worth keeping from this is the Chapter 1 review and classification of quantum identity authentication—that's a solid, well-organized taxonomy that students and researchers new to QIA will actually use.

The good bits: the chronological review of QIA protocols, organized by resources and tasks, is careful and complete, and the table of key features (pre-shared key, third party, quantum memory) is a handy reference. Protocol 2.3, the Bell-state controlled QIA with permutation, is a plausible new construction, and the security analysis against impersonation is fine as far as it goes. The CQKA protocol without quantum memory is a practical improvement over Tang et al., and the comparison table makes that concrete. The game-theoretic Nash equilibrium analysis of DL04 is a nice piece of applied game theory: it honestly finds no Pareto-optimal Nash equilibrium and derives mixed-strategy bounds, which is a reasonable outcome. The author is also straight about the chapters being published work, so the compilation itself is not hiding its provenance.

The soft spots. The biggest is Chapter 3's 'new variable δ.' The abstract and Section 3.3 claim that classical pre-processing with δ raises the tolerable error threshold, but the text never defines δ, its range, or what physical statistics fix its value. Figure 3.1 plots curves with and without δ, but without a derivation, the 'with δ' curve is an envelope over free parameters, not a lower bound—so the claimed efficiency advantage over SARG04 is not established. Second, the P(B|A) table in Section 2.2.4.3 is internally inconsistent: the same row says 1/8 and 3/8 for the same condition. Third, the promised defense against key-space-reduction attacks for Protocols 2.1/2.2 is announced in Section 1.5.1.2 but never delivered in Section 2.2.4—and given Zawadzki's protocol was broken by exactly that attack, this is a gap the authors need to fill. Fourth, the QKD security analysis is limited to intercept-resend and selected collective attacks, with no finite-size or composable analysis, so 'rigorously proven' in the abstract overshoots.

Verdict: worth a serious referee. A referee can demand the δ derivation, fix the table, and require the missing key-space-reduction argument. The QIA review alone justifies engaging with it. I'd send it to peer review expecting major revision. Reading group: only if someone is surveying QIA; the protocol chapters need pinning down first.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a PhD thesis that collects and analyzes several discrete-variable quantum communication protocols. It proposes (i) single-photon and Bell-state quantum identity authentication (QIA) protocols, (ii) two QKD protocols claimed to be practical with weak coherent pulses and more efficient than SARG04, (iii) a controlled quantum key agreement (CQKA) protocol that does not require quantum memory, and (iv) a game-theoretic security analysis of the DL04 protocol using Nash equilibrium. The central claims are that the QIA protocols resist impersonation, intercept-resend, and fraudulent attacks; that the QKD protocols are rigorously proven secure against intercept-resend and certain collective attacks, with classical pre-processing improving the tolerable QBER threshold; and that the CQKA protocol is fair and secure without quantum memory. The thesis also includes a chronological review and classification of QIA protocols.

Significance. If fully established, the two new QKD protocols would be a practical contribution: they avoid entanglement and ideal single-photon sources, claim higher efficiency than SARG04, and are stated to have larger critical distances under PNS attacks. The CQKA protocol's avoidance of quantum memory and use of Bell and single-photon states is also a valuable step beyond GHZ-based schemes. The game-theoretic QBER-bound analysis is an original methodological angle. The manuscript is honest in restricting the QKD adversary to 'certain collective attacks,' and it provides detailed protocol descriptions, explicit attack analyses, noise models, and comparative tables. However, several load-bearing derivations and security analyses are incomplete or internally inconsistent in the version provided, so the significance is conditional on those points being repaired.

major comments (4)

[§3.3, Fig. 3.1] The central efficiency claim rests on Figure 3.1, which shows that the tolerable QBER threshold increases when a 'new variable δ' is incorporated. The manuscript does not define δ, state its domain, or show how it is fixed by protocol statistics (e.g., sifted key, error correction, or a concrete classical pre-processing map). If δ is a free parameter, the 'with δ' curves are envelopes over a family of formulas rather than lower bounds on the secret-key rate, and the claimed threshold advantage over SARG04 does not follow. An explicit definition of δ and a derivation of the plotted curves are required before this claim can be evaluated.
[§2.2.4.3] The P(B|A) table has two entries both labeled 'identical basis with distinct outcomes' but with different values (1/8 and 3/8), and a third entry for 'different basis' with value 0. The subsequent entropy calculation uses P(correct)=3/4 and P(wrong)=1/4, which is inconsistent with the table and suggests the table mixes joint and conditional probabilities. Because the security claim for Protocols 2.1/2.2 is based on the resulting mutual information values I(A:B)=1.0 and I(A:E)=0.311, this inconsistency must be corrected and the calculation redone or the security claim retracted.
[§1.5.1.2 / §2.2.4] Section 1.5.1.2 promises that the new single-qubit QIA protocols 'address vulnerabilities, including key space reduction attacks.' Sections 2.2.4.1–2.2.4.6 analyze impersonation, measurement-resend, and impersonated-fraudulent attacks, but contain no analysis of key-space-reduction attacks. This is a missing defense for a stated design goal; either add the analysis or remove the claim.
[Abstract / §3.3–3.4] The abstract states that the QKD protocols are 'rigorously proven to be secure against various attacks, including intercept-resend and certain collective attacks.' The security analysis in Chapter 3 is restricted to a specified set of attacks (intercept-resend, PNS, IRUD, and some collective strategies) and does not provide a composable or finite-key argument. This is acceptable as an explicitly stated threat model, but the abstract and conclusions should state clearly that security holds only within that restricted, asymptotic model; otherwise 'rigorously proven' overstates the result.

minor comments (4)

[§2.2.4.3] P(B|A) is described as a joint probability but written as a conditional; use one convention consistently throughout the table and the surrounding text.
[§2.2.4.1–2.2.4.2 / Fig. 2.1] The text says Protocol 2.1 requires a minimum of 6 pre-shared classical bits and Protocol 2.2 at least 10, while the formulas use n particles (2n or 4n bits). Clarify whether n denotes bits, bit pairs, or particles; the figure axis should match.
[§2.3.3.2, Eq. (2.9)] The condition 'I(A;B) ≥ χ(ρ)' is not the standard use of the Holevo bound: χ upper-bounds Eve's accessible information, so the security condition should relate I(A;E) to χ and then compare I(A;B) with I(A;E).
[Throughout] There are many OCR-type artifacts and inconsistent symbols (e.g., in the P(B|A) table and in the quantum-state equations). A careful proofreading pass is needed before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; security analyses are largely self-contained against the stated attack models. The under-specified 'new variable δ' in Chapter 3 is a correctness/derivation gap, not a demonstrated circular reduction.

full rationale

The thesis's central claims—QIA protocols (Ch. 2), QKD protocols (Ch. 3), CQKA (Ch. 4), and the game-theoretic QBER bound (Ch. 5)—are each accompanied by in-thesis security derivations that model specific eavesdropping strategies and compute detection probabilities, mutual information, Holevo quantities, or Nash equilibria from the protocol rules. These quantities are not fitted to the conclusions; they are consequences of the stated game/attack models. The repeated references to the author's own publications ([165,166,162,233,259]) are statements of provenance rather than load-bearing evidence, because the relevant proofs are reproduced in the thesis rather than imported by citation. The main flagged concern is in Chapter 3 / Fig. 3.1: the claimed improvement in the tolerable error threshold is attributed to 'the new variable δ', but the visible text does not define δ or show how it is fixed by protocol statistics. If δ is an adjustable parameter inserted into the key-rate expression, then the 'with δ' curves are envelopes over a free parameter and the asserted enhancement over SARG04 is not established as a derived bound. This is an under-specified and potentially unsupported claim, but it is not yet shown to be circular in the sense of Eq. X reducing to Eq. Y by construction. Similarly, the abstract's claim that the protocols 'outperform SARG04 in efficiency' while using 'additional quantum resources' depends on the efficiency metric being used; if Cabello's q/(q+c) efficiency is intended, consuming more qubits would ordinarily reduce efficiency, so this needs clarification but is again a consistency/correctness issue rather than a circularity. Overall, the thesis does not exhibit a load-bearing self-citation chain or a fitted-parameter-renamed-as-prediction pattern, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The protocols rest on standard quantum mechanics plus two strong domain assumptions: a secret pre-shared key and a restricted adversary. The visible free parameter is the δ variable in the QKD key-rate plots. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

δ (classical pre-processing parameter in Chapter 3) = not stated
Fig. 3.1 shows key-rate thresholds with and without 'the new variable δ'; the value is not derived in the visible text and appears to be chosen to improve the tolerable QBER. The key-rate claim is conditional on this choice.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Alice and Bob possess a secret pre-shared authentication key K that Eve does not know.
Protocols 2.1 through 2.4 and the QKD protocols assume this starting condition (Sections 2.2 and 2.3).
domain assumption The adversary is restricted to the attack classes analyzed: impersonation, intercept-resend, PNS, IRUD, and 'certain collective attacks'.
The abstract and Chapter 3 define the threat model; general coherent attacks and finite-size effects are not analyzed.
standard math Standard quantum information facts: no-cloning theorem, Holevo bound, entanglement swapping, Bell measurement, decoy-state checks.
Used throughout Sections 1.2, 2.3, and 3.3.
domain assumption Noise, when considered, follows specific models (collective dephasing, collective rotation, amplitude and phase damping).
Collective noise analysis in Section 2.3.4 and Chapter 4 depends on these model assumptions.
ad hoc to paper Nash equilibrium of a mixed-strategy game is a valid criterion for bounding the QBER of a communication protocol.
Chapter 5 derives secure QBER thresholds from game equilibria; equating cryptographic security with Nash equilibrium is a modeling assumption specific to the thesis.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Design and analysis of a set of discrete variable protocols for secure quantum communication." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/75M6E2YX

@misc{pith2026250806380,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Design and analysis of a set of discrete variable protocols for secure quantum communication},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/75M6E2YX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06380}
}

read the original abstract

The advent of quantum key distribution (QKD) has revolutionized secure communication by providing unconditional security, unlike classical cryptographic methods. However, its effectiveness relies on robust identity authentication, as vulnerabilities in the authentication process can cause a compromise with the security of the entire communication system. Over the past three decades, numerous quantum identity authentication (QIA) protocols have been proposed. This thesis first presents a chronological review of these protocols, categorizing them based on quantum resources and computational tasks involved while analyzing their strengths and limitations. Subsequently, by recognizing inherent symmetries present in the existing protocols, we design novel QIA schemes based on secure computational and communication tasks. Specifically, this work introduces a set of new QIA protocols that utilize controlled secure direct quantum communication. The proposed scheme facilitates mutual authentication between two users, Alice and Bob, with assistance from a third party, Charlie, using Bell states. A comprehensive security analysis demonstrates its robustness against impersonation, intercept-resend, and fraudulent authentication attacks. The comparative evaluation highlights its advantages over existing schemes. Additionally, this thesis presents two novel QKD protocols that eliminate the need for entanglement or ideal single-photon sources, making them feasible with commercially available photon sources. These protocols are rigorously proven to be secure against various attacks, including intercept-resend and certain collective attacks. Key rate bounds are established, demonstrating that specific classical pre-processing enhances the tolerable error threshold. PHD THESIS

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

296 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

[1]

Satellite-relayed intercontinental quantum network ,

Liao S.-K., Cai W.-Q., Handsteiner J., Liu B., Yin J., Zhang L., Rauch D., Fink M., Ren J.-G., Liu W.-Y .et al., “Satellite-relayed intercontinental quantum network ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, no. 3, p. 030501, 2018

2018
[2]

Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance,

Liu Y ., Zhang W.-J., Jiang C., Chen J.-P., Zhang C., Pan W.-X., Ma D., Dong H., Xiong J.-M., Zhang C.-J. et al., “Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 130, no. 21, p. 210801, 2023

2023
[3]

Recent advances in post-quantum cryptography for networks: A survey ,

Zeydan E., Turk Y ., Aksoy B., and Ozturk S. B., “Recent advances in post-quantum cryptography for networks: A survey ,” in 2022 Seventh International Conference On Mobile And Secure Services (MobiSecServ). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–8

2022
[4]

Quantum communication with RLP quantum resistant cryptography in industrial manufacturing ,

Senapati B. and Rawal B. S., “Quantum communication with RLP quantum resistant cryptography in industrial manufacturing ,” Cyber Security and Applications, vol. 1, p. 100019, 2023

2023
[5]

DPCrypto: Acceleration of post-quantum cryptography using dot-product instructions on GPUs ,

Lee W.-K., Seo H., Hwang S. O., Achar R., Karmakar A., and Mera J. M. B.,“DPCrypto: Acceleration of post-quantum cryptography using dot-product instructions on GPUs ,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 3591– 3604, 2022

2022
[6]

On the law of distribution of energy in the normal spectrum ,

Planck M., “On the law of distribution of energy in the normal spectrum ,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 4, no. 553, p. 1, 1901

1901
[7]

Über einen die erzeugung und verwandlung des lichtes betreffenden heuris- tischen gesichtspunkt,

Einstein A., “Über einen die erzeugung und verwandlung des lichtes betreffenden heuris- tischen gesichtspunkt,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 322, no. 6, pp. 132–148, 1905

1905
[8]

Classical light vs. nonclassical light: characterizations and interesting applications,

Pathak A. and Ghatak A., “Classical light vs. nonclassical light: characterizations and interesting applications,” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 229–264, 2018. 220

2018

Show all 296 references

[9]

On the constitution of atoms and molecules ,

Bohr N., “On the constitution of atoms and molecules ,” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, vol. 26, no. 151, pp. 1–25, 1913

1913
[10]

Recherches sur la théorie des quanta ,

De Broglie L., “Recherches sur la théorie des quanta ,” Ph.D. dissertation, Migration- université en cours d’affectation, 1924

1924
[11]

Quantisierung als eigenwertproblem,

Schrödinger E., “Quantisierung als eigenwertproblem,” Annalen der physik, vol. 385, no. 13, pp. 437–490, 1926

1926
[12]

Quantum-theoretical re-interpretation of kinematic and mechanical re- lations,

Heisenberg W., “Quantum-theoretical re-interpretation of kinematic and mechanical re- lations,” Z. Phys, vol. 33, pp. 879–893, 1925

1925
[13]

The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics,

Heisenberg W., “The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics,” Quantum theory and measurement, pp. 62–84, 1927

1927
[14]

Can quantum-mechanical description of phys- ical reality be considered complete?

Einstein A., Podolsky B., and Rosen N., “Can quantum-mechanical description of phys- ical reality be considered complete?” Physical Review, vol. 47, no. 10, p. 777, 1935

1935
[15]

Quantum cryptography: Public-key distribution and coin tossing, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing (Bangalore, India, 1984), pp. 175-179

Bennett C. H. and Brassard G., “Quantum cryptography: Public-key distribution and coin tossing, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing (Bangalore, India, 1984), pp. 175-179.” 1984

1984
[16]

Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states ,

Bennett C. H., “Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, no. 21, p. 3121, 1992

1992
[17]

Tele- porting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen chan- nels,

Bennett C. H., Brassard G., Crépeau C., Jozsa R., Peres A., and Wootters W. K., “Tele- porting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen chan- nels,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, no. 13, p. 1895, 1993

1993
[18]

Communication via one-and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states ,

Bennett C. H. and Wiesner S. J., “Communication via one-and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 69, no. 20, p. 2881, 1992

1992
[19]

Robust and adaptable quantum key distribution network without trusted nodes,

Fan-Yuan G.-J., Lu F.-Y ., Wang S., Yin Z.-Q., He D.-Y ., Chen W., Zhou Z., Wang Z.- H., Teng J., Guo G.-C. et al., “Robust and adaptable quantum key distribution network without trusted nodes,” Optica, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 812–823, 2022. 221

2022
[20]

Breaking the rate-loss bound of quantum key distribution with asynchronous two-photon interference,

Xie Y .-M., Lu Y .-S., Weng C.-X., Cao X.-Y ., Jia Z.-Y ., Bao Y ., Wang Y ., Fu Y ., Yin H.-L., and Chen Z.-B., “Breaking the rate-loss bound of quantum key distribution with asynchronous two-photon interference,” PRX Quantum, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 020315, 2022

2022
[21]

A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems,

Rivest R. L., Shamir A., and Adleman L., “A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 120– 126, 1978

1978
[22]

New directions in cryptography ,

Diffie W. and Hellman M., “New directions in cryptography ,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 644–654, 1976

1976
[23]

CRC Press Boca Raton, 2013

Pathak A., Elements of quantum computation and quantum communication. CRC Press Boca Raton, 2013

2013
[24]

Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring ,

Shor P. W., “Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring ,” in Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, 1994, pp. 124–134

1994
[25]

A single quantum cannot be cloned,

Wootters W. K. and Zurek W. H.,“A single quantum cannot be cloned,” Nature, vol. 299, no. 5886, pp. 802–803, 1982

1982
[26]

Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process,

Landauer R., “Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process,” IBM journal of research and development, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 183–191, 1961

1961
[27]

Quantum sensor network metrology with bright solitons,

Tsarev D., Osipov S., Lee R.-K., Kulik S., and Alodjants A., “Quantum sensor network metrology with bright solitons,” Physical Review A, vol. 108, no. 6, p. 062612, 2023

2023
[28]

Quantum computing: Predictions and challenges,

Kulik S. P., “Quantum computing: Predictions and challenges,” Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute, vol. 50, no. Suppl 12, pp. S1330–S1340, 2023

2023
[29]

Quantum computers and quantum coherence,

DiVincenzo D. P. and Loss D., “Quantum computers and quantum coherence,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 200, no. 1-3, pp. 202–218, 1999

1999
[30]

Conjugate coding,

Wiesner S., “Conjugate coding,” ACM Sigact News, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 78–88, 1983

1983
[31]

Brief history of quantum cryptography: A personal perspective ,

Brassard G., “Brief history of quantum cryptography: A personal perspective ,” in IEEE Information Theory Workshop on Theory and Practice in Information-Theoretic Security,
[32]

Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem,

Ekert A. K., “Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 67, no. 6, p. 661, 1991

1991
[33]

New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality,

Wegman M. N. and Carter J. L., “New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 265–279, 1981

1981
[34]

A multi-mode free-space delay interferometer with no refractive compensation elements for phase-encoded QKD proto- cols,

Tretiakov V ., Kravtsov K., Klimov A., and Kulik S., “A multi-mode free-space delay interferometer with no refractive compensation elements for phase-encoded QKD proto- cols,” Laser Physics Letters, vol. 21, no. 6, p. 065206, 2024

2024
[35]

Quantum oblivious mutual identification ,

Crépeau C. and Salvail L., “Quantum oblivious mutual identification ,” in International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. Springer, 1995, pp. 133–146

1995
[36]

Quantum key distribution with authentication ,

Zeng G. and Wang X., “Quantum key distribution with authentication ,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/9812022, 1998

1998 arXiv
[37]

Quantum identification system,

Dušek M., Haderka O., Hendrych M., and Myška R., “Quantum identification system,” Physical Review A, vol. 60, no. 1, p. 149, 1999

1999
[38]

Quantum authentication using entangled states ,

Li X. and Barnum H., “Quantum authentication using entangled states ,” International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, vol. 15, no. 04, pp. 609–617, 2004

2004
[39]

Multiparty simultaneous quantum identity authentication based on entanglement swapping,

W ANG J., ZHANG Q., and TANG C.-J., “Multiparty simultaneous quantum identity authentication based on entanglement swapping,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2360–2363, 2006

2006
[40]

Quantum authentication using entangled state,

Zhang Y .-S., Li C.-F., and Guo G.-C., “Quantum authentication using entangled state,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0008044, 2000

2000 arXiv
[41]

Quantum identity authentication based on ping-pong technique for photons,

Zhang Z., Zeng G., Zhou N., and Xiong J., “Quantum identity authentication based on ping-pong technique for photons,” Physics Letters A, vol. 356, no. 3, pp. 199–205, 2006

2006
[42]

A novel quantum identity authenti- cation based on Bell states,

Zhang S., Chen Z.-K., Shi R.-H., and Liang F.-Y ., “A novel quantum identity authenti- cation based on Bell states,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 236–249, 2020. 223

2020
[43]

Controlled mu- tual quantum entity authentication with an untrusted third party,

Kang M.-S., Heo J., Hong C.-H., Yang H.-J., Han S.-W., and Moon S., “Controlled mu- tual quantum entity authentication with an untrusted third party,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 159, 2018

2018
[44]

Controlled quantum secure direct commu- nication and authentication protocol based on five-particle cluster state and quantum one-time pad,

Chang Y ., Xu C., Zhang S., and Yan L., “Controlled quantum secure direct commu- nication and authentication protocol based on five-particle cluster state and quantum one-time pad,” Chinese Science Bulletin, vol. 59, no. 21, pp. 2541–2546, 2014

2014
[45]

Quantum identification schemes with entanglements ,

Mihara T., “Quantum identification schemes with entanglements ,” Physical Review A, vol. 65, no. 5, p. 052326, 2002

2002
[46]

Quantum communication complexity ,

Brassard G., “Quantum communication complexity ,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1593–1616, 2003

2003
[47]

Quantum circuit complexity,

Yao A. C.-C., “Quantum circuit complexity,” in Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, 1993, pp. 352–361

1993
[48]

Substituting quantum entanglement for communication ,

Cleve R. and Buhrman H., “Substituting quantum entanglement for communication ,” Physical Review A, vol. 56, no. 2, p. 1201, 1997

1997
[49]

Quantum communication complexity of quantum authentication protocols,

Guedes E. B. and Assis F. M. de, “Quantum communication complexity of quantum authentication protocols,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1105.5370, 2011

2011 arXiv
[50]

Classification of quantum authentica- tion protocols and calculation of their complexity,

Ghilen A., Belmabrouk H., and Bouallegue R., “Classification of quantum authentica- tion protocols and calculation of their complexity,” in 2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA). IEEE, 2014, pp. 169–173

2014
[51]

Two-step orthogonal-state-based protocol of quantum secure direct communication with the help of order-rearrangement technique,

Yadav P., Srikanth R., and Pathak A., “Two-step orthogonal-state-based protocol of quantum secure direct communication with the help of order-rearrangement technique,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2731–2743, 2014

2014
[52]

Quantum secure direct communication with mutual authen- tication via rotation of an arbitrary basis,

Nayana D. and Paul G. K., “Quantum secure direct communication with mutual authen- tication via rotation of an arbitrary basis,” Nov. 16 2023, uS Patent App. 17/894,801

2023
[53]

On the group-theoretic structure of a class of quantum dialogue protocols,

Shukla C., Kothari V ., Banerjee A., and Pathak A., “On the group-theoretic structure of a class of quantum dialogue protocols,” Physics Letters A, vol. 377, no. 7, pp. 518–527, 2013. 224

2013
[54]

Orthogonal-state-based deterministic secure quantum com- munication without actual transmission of the message qubits ,

Shukla C. and Pathak A., “Orthogonal-state-based deterministic secure quantum com- munication without actual transmission of the message qubits ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2099–2113, 2014
[55]

Is quantum bit commitment really possible?

Lo H.-K. and Chau H. F., “Is quantum bit commitment really possible?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 17, p. 3410, 1997

1997
[56]

Quantum secure identification using entanglement and catalysis,

Barnum H. N., “Quantum secure identification using entanglement and catalysis,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/9910072, 1999

1999 arXiv
[57]

Sok: An evaluation of quantum authentication through sys- tematic literature review,

Majumdar R. and Das S., “Sok: An evaluation of quantum authentication through sys- tematic literature review,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Usable Security and Pri- vacy (USEC), 2021

2021
[58]

Authority-based user authentication in quantum key distribution,

Ljunggren D., Bourennane M., and Karlsson A., “Authority-based user authentication in quantum key distribution,” Physical Review A, vol. 62, no. 2, p. 022305, 2000

2000
[59]

Quantum authentication protocol ,

Zeng G. and Guo G., “Quantum authentication protocol ,” arXiv preprint quant- ph/0001046, 2000

2000
[60]

Quantum authentication and key distribution using cataly- sis,

Jensen J. G. and Schack R., “Quantum authentication and key distribution using cataly- sis,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0003104, 2000

2000 arXiv
[61]

The quantum crypto- graphic switch,

Srinatha N., Omkar S., Srikanth R., Banerjee S., and Pathak A., “The quantum crypto- graphic switch,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2014

2014
[62]

Applications of quantum cryptographic switch: various tasks related to controlled quantum communication can be performed using Bell states and permutation of particles,

Thapliyal K. and Pathak A., “Applications of quantum cryptographic switch: various tasks related to controlled quantum communication can be performed using Bell states and permutation of particles,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2599– 2616, 2015

2015
[63]

Quantum authentication of classical messages ,

Curty M. and Santos D. J., “Quantum authentication of classical messages ,” Physical Review A, vol. 64, no. 6, p. 062309, 2001

2001
[64]

Qubit authentication,

Curty M., Santos D. J., Pérez E., and García-Fernández P.,“Qubit authentication,” Phys- ical Review A, vol. 66, no. 2, p. 022301, 2002. 225

2002
[65]

Comment on

Dam W. van, “Comment on "Quantum identification schemes with entanglements" ,” Physical Review A, vol. 68, no. 2, p. 026301, 2003

2003
[67]

Security of ping-pong protocol based on pairs of completely entangled qudits,

Zawadzki P., “Security of ping-pong protocol based on pairs of completely entangled qudits,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 11, pp. 1419–1430, 2012

2012
[68]

Improving security of the ping-pong protocol,

Zawadzki P., “Improving security of the ping-pong protocol,” Quantum Information Pro- cessing, vol. 12, pp. 149–155, 2013

2013
[69]

Increasing the security of the ping–pong protocol by using many mutually unbiased bases ,

Zawadzki P., Puchała Z., and Miszczak J. A., “Increasing the security of the ping–pong protocol by using many mutually unbiased bases ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 12, pp. 569–576, 2013

2013
[70]

Cross-center quantum identification scheme based on teleportation and entanglement swapping,

Zhou N., Zeng G., Zeng W., and Zhu F., “Cross-center quantum identification scheme based on teleportation and entanglement swapping,” Optics Communications, vol. 254, no. 4-6, pp. 380–388, 2005

2005
[71]

Quantum direct communication with authentication ,

Lee H., Lim J., and Yang H., “Quantum direct communication with authentication ,” Physical Review A, vol. 73, no. 4, p. 042305, 2006

2006
[73]

Comment on

Zhang Z.-j., Liu J., Wang D., and Shi S.-h., “Comment on "Quantum direct communica- tion with authentication",” Physical Review A, vol. 75, no. 2, p. 026301, 2007

2007
[74]

Economical multiparty simultaneous quantum iden- tity authentication based on Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states ,

Yu-Guang Y . and Qiao-Yan W., “Economical multiparty simultaneous quantum iden- tity authentication based on Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states ,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 18, no. 8, p. 3233, 2009

2009
[75]

Quantum coin-flipping-based authentication,

Rass S., Schartner P., and Greiler M., “Quantum coin-flipping-based authentication,” in 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications. IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–5. 226

2009
[76]

A new quantum secure direct communication scheme with authentication ,

Dan L., Chang-Xing P., Dong-Xiao Q., and Nan Z., “A new quantum secure direct communication scheme with authentication ,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 27, no. 5, p. 050306, 2010

2010
[77]

Quantum identity authentication using gaussian-modulated squeezed states ,

Huang P., Zhu J., Lu Y ., and Zeng G.-H., “Quantum identity authentication using gaussian-modulated squeezed states ,” International Journal of Quantum Information, vol. 9, no. 02, pp. 701–721, 2011

2011
[78]

Identity authentication and key distribution protocol based on quantum one-way function,

Gong C.-Q., Tang H., and Zhang D.-W., “Identity authentication and key distribution protocol based on quantum one-way function,” Computer Engineering, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 161–160, 2012

2012
[79]

Key management and user authentication for quantum cryptography networks,

Gelfond R. and Berzanskis A., “Key management and user authentication for quantum cryptography networks,” Dec. 25 2012

2012
[80]

Physical one-way functions,

Pappu R., Recht B., Taylor J., and Gershenfeld N., “Physical one-way functions,” Sci- ence, vol. 297, no. 5589, pp. 2026–2030, 2002

2026
[81]

Quantum- secure authentication of a physical unclonable key ,

Goorden S. A., Horstmann M., Mosk A. P., Škori ´c B., and Pinkse P. W., “Quantum- secure authentication of a physical unclonable key ,” Optica, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 421–424, 2014

2014
[82]

Authentication with phys- ical unclonable functions,

Ziola T., Paral Z., Devadas S., Suh G. E., and Khandelwal V .,“Authentication with phys- ical unclonable functions,” Jul. 15 2014

2014
[83]

Quantum authenticated direct communication using Bell states,

Yang Y .-G., Tian J., Xia J., and Zhang H.,“Quantum authenticated direct communication using Bell states,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 336– 344, 2013

2013
[84]

A general method for selecting quantum chan- nel for bidirectional controlled state teleportation and other schemes of controlled quan- tum communication,

Thapliyal K., Verma A., and Pathak A., “A general method for selecting quantum chan- nel for bidirectional controlled state teleportation and other schemes of controlled quan- tum communication,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 4601–4614, 2015

2015
[85]

Identity authentication by entanglement swapping in controlled quantum teleportation,

Tan X. and Jiang L., “Identity authentication by entanglement swapping in controlled quantum teleportation,” International Journal of Embedded Systems 4, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2014. 227

2014
[86]

Quantum deniable authentication protocol ,

Shi W.-M., Zhou Y .-H., and Yang Y .-G.,“Quantum deniable authentication protocol ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1501–1510, 2014

2014
[87]

Quantum identity authentication based on ping-pong technique without entanglements ,

Yuan H., Liu Y .-m., Pan G.-z., Zhang G., Zhou J., and Zhang Z.-j., “Quantum identity authentication based on ping-pong technique without entanglements ,” Quantum Infor- mation Processing, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2535–2549, 2014

2014
[88]

Secure deterministic communication without entangle- ment,

Lucamarini M. and Mancini S., “Secure deterministic communication without entangle- ment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 14, p. 140501, 2005

2005
[89]

Quantum direct secret shar- ing with efficient eavesdropping-check and authentication based on distributed fountain codes,

Lai H., Xiao J., Orgun M. A., Xue L., and Pieprzyk J., “Quantum direct secret shar- ing with efficient eavesdropping-check and authentication based on distributed fountain codes,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 895–907, 2014

2014
[90]

A novel quantum deniable au- thentication protocol without entanglement,

Shi W.-M., Zhang J.-B., Zhou Y .-H., and Yang Y .-G., “A novel quantum deniable au- thentication protocol without entanglement,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2183–2193, 2015

2015
[91]

High-rate measurement-device- independent quantum cryptography,

Pirandola S., Ottaviani C., Spedalieri G., Weedbrook C., Braunstein S. L., Lloyd S., Gehring T., Jacobsen C. S., and Andersen U. L., “High-rate measurement-device- independent quantum cryptography,” Nature Photonics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 397–402, 2015

2015
[92]

Discrete and continuous variables for measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography,

Xu F., Curty M., Qi B., Qian L., and Lo H.-K., “Discrete and continuous variables for measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography,” Nature Photonics, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 772–773, 2015

2015
[93]

Reply to’discrete and continuous vari- ables for measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography’ ,

Pirandola S., Ottaviani C., Spedalieri G., Weedbrook C., Braunstein S. L., Lloyd S., Gehring T., Jacobsen C. S., and Andersen U. L.,“Reply to’discrete and continuous vari- ables for measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography’ ,” Nature Photonics, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 7...

2015
[94]

Implementation and evaluation of intrinsic authentication in quantum key distribution protocols,

Rass S., König S., Schauer S., and Maurhart O., “Implementation and evaluation of intrinsic authentication in quantum key distribution protocols,” International Journal on Advances in Security, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016

2016
[95]

Quantum readout of physical unclonable functions,

Škori ´c B., “Quantum readout of physical unclonable functions,” International Journal of Quantum Information, vol. 10, no. 01, p. 1250001, 2012. 228

2012
[96]

Quantum cloning attacks against PUF-based quantum authentication systems ,

Yao Y ., Gao M., Li M., and Zhang J., “Quantum cloning attacks against PUF-based quantum authentication systems ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 3311–3325, 2016

2016
[97]

Security of quantum-readout PUFs against quadrature-based challenge-estimation attacks ,

Škori ´c B., Mosk A. P., and Pinkse P. W., “Security of quantum-readout PUFs against quadrature-based challenge-estimation attacks ,” International Journal of Quantum In- formation, vol. 11, no. 04, p. 1350041, 2013

2013
[98]

The universal composable security of quantum message authentication with key recyling,

Hayden P., Leung D. W., and Mayers D.,“The universal composable security of quantum message authentication with key recyling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.09434, 2016

2016 arXiv
[99]

Security of quantum key distribution ,

Renner R., “Security of quantum key distribution ,” International Journal of Quantum Information, vol. 6, no. 01, pp. 1–127, 2008

2008
[100]

Quantum identity authentication with single photon,

Hong C. ho, Heo J., Jang J. G., and Kwon D., “Quantum identity authentication with single photon,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 16, no. 10, p. 236, 2017

2017
[101]

Quantum secret sharing with identity authentication based on Bell states,

Abulkasim H., Hamad S., Khalifa A., and El Bahnasy K., “Quantum secret sharing with identity authentication based on Bell states,” International Journal of Quantum Informa- tion, vol. 15, no. 04, p. 1750023, 2017

2017
[102]

Continuous-variable quantum authentication of physical unclonable keys,

Nikolopoulos G. M. and Diamanti E., “Continuous-variable quantum authentication of physical unclonable keys,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, p. 46047, 2017

2017
[103]

Quantum authentication with key recycling,

Portmann C., “Quantum authentication with key recycling,” in Annual International Con- ference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. Springer, 2017, pp. 339–368

2017
[104]

Multi-factor authentication using quantum communication,

Hughes R. J., Peterson C. G., Thrasher J. T., Nordholt J. E., Yard J. T., Newell R. T., and Somma R. D., “Multi-factor authentication using quantum communication,” Feb. 6 2018

2018
[105]

Quantum key distribution with classical Bob ,

Boyer M., Kenigsberg D., and Mor T., “Quantum key distribution with classical Bob ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 14, p. 140501, 2007

2007
[106]

Semi-quantum communication: protocols for key agreement, controlled secure direct communication and dialogue ,

Shukla C., Thapliyal K., and Pathak A., “Semi-quantum communication: protocols for key agreement, controlled secure direct communication and dialogue ,” Quantum Infor- mation Processing, vol. 16, no. 12, p. 295, 2017. 229

2017
[108]

Quantum anonymous veto: A set of new protocols,

Mishra S., Thapliyal K., Parakh A., and Pathak A., “Quantum anonymous veto: A set of new protocols,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06260, 2021

2021 arXiv
[109]

Quantum and semi-quantum sealed-bid auc- tion: Vulnerabilities and advantages,

Asagodu P., Thapliyal K., and Pathak A., “Quantum and semi-quantum sealed-bid auc- tion: Vulnerabilities and advantages,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.06388, 2021

2021 arXiv
[110]

A semi-quantum authentication protocol for message and identity,

Wen X.-J., Zhao X.-Q., Gong L.-H., and Zhou N.-R., “A semi-quantum authentication protocol for message and identity,” Laser Physics Letters, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 075206, 2019

2019
[111]

Quantum identity authenti- cation in the counterfactual quantum key distribution protocol,

Liu B., Gao Z., Xiao D., Huang W., Zhang Z., and Xu B., “Quantum identity authenti- cation in the counterfactual quantum key distribution protocol,” Entropy, vol. 21, no. 5, p. 518, 2019

2019
[112]

Controlled quantum secure direct communication with authentication protocol based on five-particle cluster state and classical xor operation,

Zheng X.-y. and Long Y .-x., “Controlled quantum secure direct communication with authentication protocol based on five-particle cluster state and classical xor operation,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 129, 2019

2019
[113]

A realistic lightweight anonymous authentication protocol for securing real-time application data access in wireless sensor networks ,

Gope P. and Hwang T., “A realistic lightweight anonymous authentication protocol for securing real-time application data access in wireless sensor networks ,” IEEE Transac- tions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 7124–7132, 2016

2016
[114]

Robust quantum secure direct commu- nication and authentication protocol against decoherence noise based on six-qubit df state,

Yan C., Shi-Bin Z., Li-Li Y ., and Gui-Hua H., “Robust quantum secure direct commu- nication and authentication protocol against decoherence noise based on six-qubit df state,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 24, no. 5, p. 050307, 2015

2015
[115]

Quantum identity authentication protocol based on three- photon quantum error avoidance code in edge computing ,

Qu Z., Liu X., and Wu S., “Quantum identity authentication protocol based on three- photon quantum error avoidance code in edge computing ,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, p. e3945, 2020

2020
[116]

Quantum private query with authentication,

Xiao M. and Lei S., “Quantum private query with authentication,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 166, 2021

2021
[117]

Quantum secure direct communication with mutual authentication using a single basis,

Das N., Paul G., and Majumdar R., “Quantum secure direct communication with mutual authentication using a single basis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.03577, 2021. 230

2021 arXiv
[118]

Quantum identity authentication without entanglement ,

Zawadzki P., “Quantum identity authentication without entanglement ,” Quantum Infor- mation Processing, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 7, 2019

2019
[119]

An attack on Zawadzki’s quantum authentication scheme ,

González-Guillén C. E., González Vasco M. I., Johnson F., and Pozo Á. L. Pérez del, “An attack on Zawadzki’s quantum authentication scheme ,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 389, 2021

2021
[120]

Utilizing a fully optical and reconfigurable PUF as a quantum authentication mechanism,

Jacinto H. S., Smith A. M., and Rafla N. I., “Utilizing a fully optical and reconfigurable PUF as a quantum authentication mechanism,” OSA Continuum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 739– 747, 2021

2021
[121]

Client-server identification protocols with quantum PUF,

Doosti M., Kumar N., Delavar M., and Kashefi E.,“Client-server identification protocols with quantum PUF,” ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–40, 2021

2021
[122]

Quantum PUF for security and trust in quantum computing ,

Phalak K., Ash-Saki A., Alam M., Topaloglu R. O., and Ghosh S., “Quantum PUF for security and trust in quantum computing ,” IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 333–342, 2021

2021
[123]

A new quantum multiparty simultaneous identity authentication protocol with the classical third-party,

Li X., Zhang K., Zhang L., and Zhao X., “A new quantum multiparty simultaneous identity authentication protocol with the classical third-party,” Entropy, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 483, 2022

2022
[124]

Measurement device–independent quantum secure direct commu- nication with user authentication ,

Das N. and Paul G., “Measurement device–independent quantum secure direct commu- nication with user authentication ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 21, no. 7, p. 260, 2022

2022
[125]

Mutual authentication quantum key agreement protocol based on Bell states,

He Y .-F., Pang Y ., and Di M.,“Mutual authentication quantum key agreement protocol based on Bell states,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 21, no. 8, p. 290, 2022

2022
[126]

A measurement device independent multi-party quantum key agreement protocol with identity authentication,

Li G.-D., Cheng W.-C., Wang Q.-L., and Liu J.-C., “A measurement device independent multi-party quantum key agreement protocol with identity authentication,” Quantum In- formation Processing, vol. 22, no. 12, p. 443, 2023

2023
[127]

Entanglement based six-state quantum cryptography proto- col: exact proof of security,

Kulik S. and Molotkov S., “Entanglement based six-state quantum cryptography proto- col: exact proof of security,” Laser Physics Letters, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 055203, 2023. 231

2023
[128]

Quantum identity authentication based on the extension of quantum rotation ,

Chen G., Wang Y ., Jian L., Zhou Y ., and Liu S.,“Quantum identity authentication based on the extension of quantum rotation ,” EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 11, 2023

2023
[129]

Quantum identity authentication protocol based on flexible quantum homomorphic encryption with qubit rotation,

Chen G., Wang Y ., Jian L., Zhou Y ., Liu S., Luo J., and Yang K., “Quantum identity authentication protocol based on flexible quantum homomorphic encryption with qubit rotation,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 133, no. 6, 2023

2023
[130]

Single-photon based three- party quantum secure direct communication with identity authentication ,

Zhang Q., Du M.-M., Zhong W., Sheng Y .-B., and Zhou L.,“Single-photon based three- party quantum secure direct communication with identity authentication ,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 536, no. 3, p. 2300407, 2024

2024
[131]

Quantum secret sharing with (m, n) threshold: QFT and identity authentication ,

Mawlia P., Siwach V ., Bijaranian P., and Singh D.,“Quantum secret sharing with (m, n) threshold: QFT and identity authentication ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 23, no. 10, p. 348, 2024

2024
[132]

An efficient quantum identity authentication key agree- ment protocol without entanglement,

Zhu H., Wang L., and Zhang Y .,“An efficient quantum identity authentication key agree- ment protocol without entanglement,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 19, no. 10, p. 381, 2020

2020
[133]

Application of quantum cryptography pro- tocols in authentication process,

Sobota M., Kapczy ´nski A., and Banasik A., “Application of quantum cryptography pro- tocols in authentication process,” in Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Confer- ence on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems, vol. 2. IEEE, 2011, pp. 799–802

2011
[134]

Continuous variable direct secure quantum communication using gaussian states,

Srikara S., Thapliyal K., and Pathak A., “Continuous variable direct secure quantum communication using gaussian states,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 132, 2020

2020
[135]

Maximally efficient protocols for direct secure quantum communication,

Banerjee A. and Pathak A., “Maximally efficient protocols for direct secure quantum communication,” Physics Letters A, vol. 376, no. 45, pp. 2944–2950, 2012

2012
[136]

Quantum direct communication with continuous variables,

Pirandola S., Braunstein S. L., Mancini S., and Lloyd S., “Quantum direct communication with continuous variables,” EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 84, no. 2, p. 20013, oct 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/84/20013 232

2008 doi
[137]

Quantum authentication protocol using Bell state ,

Li X. and Chen L., “Quantum authentication protocol using Bell state ,” in The First International Symposium on Data, Privacy, and E-Commerce (ISDPE 2007). IEEE, 2007, pp. 128–132

2007
[138]

Unconditional security of quantum key distribution over ar- bitrarily long distances,

Lo H.-K. and Chau H. F., “Unconditional security of quantum key distribution over ar- bitrarily long distances,” Science, vol. 283, no. 5410, pp. 2050–2056, 1999
[139]

Polarization– orbital angular momentum duality assisted entanglement observation for indistinguish- able photons,

Lal N., Mishra S., Rani A., Banerji A., Perumangatt C., and Singh R., “Polarization– orbital angular momentum duality assisted entanglement observation for indistinguish- able photons,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 90, 2023

2023
[140]

Entanglement propaga- tion of a quantum optical vortex state,

Banerji A., Singh R. P., Banerjee D., and Bandyopadhyay A., “Entanglement propaga- tion of a quantum optical vortex state,” Optics Communications, vol. 380, pp. 492–498, 2016

2016
[141]

Continuous-variable quantum identity authenti- cation based on quantum teleportation,

Ma H., Huang P., Bao W., and Zeng G.,“Continuous-variable quantum identity authenti- cation based on quantum teleportation,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2605–2620, 2016

2016
[142]

Authentication of quan- tum messages,

Barnum H., Crépeau C., Gottesman D., Smith A., and Tapp A., “Authentication of quan- tum messages,” in The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Sci- ence, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE, 2002, pp. 449–458

2002
[143]

Quantum secret sharing proto- col using GHZ state: implementation on IBM qiskit ,

Basak N., Das N., Paul G., Nandi K., and Patel N., “Quantum secret sharing proto- col using GHZ state: implementation on IBM qiskit ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 22, no. 11, p. 393, 2023

2023
[144]

Multiparty simultaneous quantum identity authentica- tion with secret sharing,

Yang Y ., Wen Q., and Zhang X.,“Multiparty simultaneous quantum identity authentica- tion with secret sharing,” Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 321–327, 2008

2008
[145]

Authenticated quantum secret sharing with quantum dialogue based on Bell states ,

Abulkasim H., Hamad S., El Bahnasy K., and Rida S. Z., “Authenticated quantum secret sharing with quantum dialogue based on Bell states ,” Physica Scripta, vol. 91, no. 8, p. 085101, 2016

2016
[146]

Useful equations about Bell states and their applications to quantum secret sharing,

Shi R.-H., “Useful equations about Bell states and their applications to quantum secret sharing,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 386–390, 2019. 233

2019
[147]

Authenticated semi-quantum secret sharing based on GHZ-type states,

Yin A. and Chen T., “Authenticated semi-quantum secret sharing based on GHZ-type states,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 265–273, 2021

2021
[148]

Asymmetric quan- tum dialogue in noisy environment ,

Banerjee A., Shukla C., Thapliyal K., Pathak A., and Panigrahi P. K.,“Asymmetric quan- tum dialogue in noisy environment ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 49, 2017

2017
[149]

Comment on

Gao G., Wang Y ., Wang D., and Ye L., “Comment on "Authenticated quantum secret sharing with quantum dialogue based on Bell states",” Physica Scripta, vol. 93, no. 2, p. 027002, 2018

2018
[150]

Reply to comment on

Abulkasim H., Hamad S., and Elhadad A., “Reply to comment on "Authenticated quan- tum secret sharing with quantum dialogue based on Bell states" ,” Physica Scripta, vol. 93, no. 2, p. 027001, 2018

2018
[151]

Secure assisted quantum computation,

Childs A. M., “Secure assisted quantum computation,” Quantum Information and Com- putation, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 456–466, 2005

2005
[152]

Blind quantum computation with identity authentication,

Li Q., Li Z., Chan W. H., Zhang S., and Liu C.,“Blind quantum computation with identity authentication,” Physics Letters A, vol. 382, no. 14, pp. 938–941, 2018

2018
[153]

A simplified verifiable blind quantum com- puting protocol with quantum input verification,

Quan J., Li Q., Liu C., Shi J., and Peng Y ., “A simplified verifiable blind quantum com- puting protocol with quantum input verification,” Quantum Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, p. e58, 2021

2021
[154]

Multi-party blind quantum computation protocol with mutual authentication in network ,

Shan R.-T., Chen X., and Yuan K.-G., “Multi-party blind quantum computation protocol with mutual authentication in network ,” Science China Information Sciences, vol. 64, no. 6, p. 162302, 2021

2021
[155]

Blind quantum signature with blind quantum computation,

Li W., Shi R., and Guo Y .,“Blind quantum signature with blind quantum computation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1108–1115, 2017

2017
[156]

Quantum identity authentication protocol based on three- photon quantum error avoidance code ,

Qu Z., Liu X., and Wu S., “Quantum identity authentication protocol based on three- photon quantum error avoidance code ,” in 2019 International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Socia...

2019
[157]

Continuous variable controlled quantum di- alogue and secure multiparty quantum computation ,

Saxena A., Thapliyal K., and Pathak A., “Continuous variable controlled quantum di- alogue and secure multiparty quantum computation ,” International Journal of Quantum Information, vol. 18, no. 04, p. 2050009, 2020

2020
[158]

Secure multi-party quantum computation,

Crépeau C., Gottesman D., and Smith A., “Secure multi-party quantum computation,” in Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, 2002, pp. 643–652

2002
[159]

Quantum conference,

Banerjee A., Thapliyal K., Shukla C., and Pathak A., “Quantum conference,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 161, 2018

2018
[160]

Quantum cryptography based on orthogonal states ,

Goldenberg L. and Vaidman L., “Quantum cryptography based on orthogonal states ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, no. 7, p. 1239, 1995

1995
[161]

Authenticated semiquantum dialogue with secure dele- gated quantum computation over a collective noise channel,

Liu L., Xiao M., and Song X., “Authenticated semiquantum dialogue with secure dele- gated quantum computation over a collective noise channel,” Quantum Information Pro- cessing, vol. 17, no. 12, p. 342, 2018

2018
[162]

New protocols for quantum key distribution with explicit upper and lower bound on secret key rate ,

Dutta A. and Pathak A., “New protocols for quantum key distribution with explicit upper and lower bound on secret key rate ,” The European Physical Journal D, vol. 79, no. 5, p. 48, 2025

2025
[163]

Quantum cryptography: key distribution and beyond,

Shenoy-Hejamadi A., Pathak A., and Radhakrishna S., “Quantum cryptography: key distribution and beyond,” Quanta, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–47, 2017

2017
[164]

Quantum cryptography,

Gisin N., Ribordy G., Tittel W., and Zbinden H., “Quantum cryptography,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, no. 1, p. 145, 2002

2002
[165]

A short review on quantum identity authentication protocols: How would Bob know that he is talking with Alice?

Dutta A. and Pathak A., “A short review on quantum identity authentication protocols: How would Bob know that he is talking with Alice? ” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 21, p. 369, 2022

2022
[166]

Controlled secure direct quantum communication inspired scheme for quantum identity authentication,

Dutta A. and Pathak A., “Controlled secure direct quantum communication inspired scheme for quantum identity authentication,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 22, p. 13, 2023

2023
[167]

Quantum-dot single-photon sources for the quantum internet,

Lu C.-Y . and Pan J.-W.,“Quantum-dot single-photon sources for the quantum internet,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1294–1296, 2021. 235

2021
[168]

The race for the ideal single-photon source is on ,

Thomas S. and Senellart P., “The race for the ideal single-photon source is on ,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 367–368, 2021

2021
[169]

Quantum key distribution with multiphoton pulses: an advantage,

Biswas A., Banerji A., Lal N., Chandravanshi P., Kumar R., and Singh R. P. , “Quantum key distribution with multiphoton pulses: an advantage,” Optics Continuum, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 68–79, 2022

2022
[170]

Quantum cryptography with coherent states,

Huttner B., Imoto N., Gisin N., and Mor T., “Quantum cryptography with coherent states,” Physical Review A, vol. 51, no. 3, p. 1863, 1995

1995
[171]

Limitations on practical quan- tum cryptography,

Brassard G., Lütkenhaus N., Mor T., and Sanders B. C., “Limitations on practical quan- tum cryptography,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 6, p. 1330, 2000

2000
[172]

Quantum cryptography protocols robust against photon number splitting attacks for weak laser pulse implementations,

Scarani V ., Acín A., Ribordy G., and Gisin N.,“Quantum cryptography protocols robust against photon number splitting attacks for weak laser pulse implementations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, no. 5, p. 057901, 2004

2004
[173]

Quantum key distribution in the holevo limit ,

Cabello A., “Quantum key distribution in the holevo limit ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 26, p. 5635, 2000

2000
[174]

A conference key distribution system ,

Ingemarsson I., Tang D., and Wong C., “A conference key distribution system ,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 714–720, 1982

1982
[175]

Key control in key agreement protocols ,

Mitchell C. J., Ward M., Wilson P. et al. , “Key control in key agreement protocols ,” Electronics Letters, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 980–980, 1998

1998
[176]

Key agreement in dynamic peer groups,

Steiner M., Tsudik G., and Waidner M., “Key agreement in dynamic peer groups,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 769–780, 2000

2000
[177]

New multiparty authentication services and key agreement protocols,

Ateniese G., Steiner M., and Tsudik G., “New multiparty authentication services and key agreement protocols,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 628–639, 2000

2000
[178]

Cryptanalysis of a multi-party quan- tum key agreement protocol with single particles ,

Huang W., Wen Q.-Y ., Liu B., Su Q., and Gao F.,“Cryptanalysis of a multi-party quan- tum key agreement protocol with single particles ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1651–1657, 2014. 236

2014
[179]

Efficient multiparty quantum key agreement with collective detection,

Huang W., Su Q., Liu B., He Y .-H., Fan F., and Xu B.-J., “Efficient multiparty quantum key agreement with collective detection,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 15264, 2017

2017
[180]

Anonymous quantum conference key agreement ,

Hahn F., Jong J. de, and Pappa A., “Anonymous quantum conference key agreement ,” PRX Quantum, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 020325, 2020

2020
[181]

Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem,

Bennett C. H., Brassard G., and Mermin N. D., “Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, no. 5, p. 557, 1992

1992
[182]

Measurement-device-independent quantum key distri- bution,

Lo H.-K., Curty M., and Qi B., “Measurement-device-independent quantum key distri- bution,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 13, p. 130503, 2012

2012
[183]

Finite-key analy- sis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution,

Curty M., Xu F., Cui W., Lim C. C. W., Tamaki K., and Lo H.-K., “Finite-key analy- sis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution,” Nature communica- tions, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 3732, 2014

2014
[184]

The security of practical quantum key distribution ,

Scarani V ., Bechmann-Pasquinucci H., Cerf N. J., Dušek M., Lütkenhaus N., and Peev M., “The security of practical quantum key distribution ,” Reviews of modern physics, vol. 81, no. 3, p. 1301, 2009

2009
[186]

Quantum secret sharing,

Hillery M., Bužek V ., and Berthiaume A., “Quantum secret sharing,” Physical Review A, vol. 59, no. 3, p. 1829, 1999

1999
[187]

Quantum entanglement for secret sharing and secret splitting,

Karlsson A., Koashi M., and Imoto N., “Quantum entanglement for secret sharing and secret splitting,” Physical Review A, vol. 59, no. 1, p. 162, 1999

1999
[188]

An integrated hier- archical dynamic quantum secret sharing protocol,

Mishra S., Shukla C., Pathak A., Srikanth R., and Venugopalan A., “An integrated hier- archical dynamic quantum secret sharing protocol,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 54, pp. 3143–3154, 2015

2015
[189]

Experimental demonstration of multiparty quantum secret sharing and conference key agreement ,

Liu S., Lu Z., Wang P., Tian Y ., Wang X., and Li Y ., “Experimental demonstration of multiparty quantum secret sharing and conference key agreement ,” npj Quantum Infor- mation, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 92, 2023. 237

2023
[190]

An efficient two-party quantum private comparison protocol with decoy photons and two-photon entanglement,

Yang Y .-G. and Wen Q.-Y .,“An efficient two-party quantum private comparison protocol with decoy photons and two-photon entanglement,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 42, no. 5, p. 055305, 2009

2009
[191]

Secure quantum private comparison,

Yang Y .-G., Cao W.-F., and Wen Q.-Y .,“Secure quantum private comparison,” Physica Scripta, vol. 80, no. 6, p. 065002, 2009

2009
[192]

An efficient protocol for the private comparison of equal information based on the triplet entangled state and single-particle measurement,

Chen X.-B., Xu G., Niu X.-X., Wen Q.-Y ., and Yang Y .-X., “An efficient protocol for the private comparison of equal information based on the triplet entangled state and single-particle measurement,” Optics Communications, vol. 283, no. 7, pp. 1561–1565, 2010

2010
[193]

Orthogonal-state-based and semi-quantum protocols for quantum private comparison in noisy environment ,

Thapliyal K., Sharma R. D., and Pathak A., “Orthogonal-state-based and semi-quantum protocols for quantum private comparison in noisy environment ,” International Journal of Quantum Information, vol. 16, no. 05, p. 1850047, 2018

2018
[194]

Quantum digital signatures ,

Gottesman D. and Chuang I., “Quantum digital signatures ,” arXiv preprint quant- ph/0105032, 2001

2001
[195]

Quantum digital signatures without quantum memory,

Dunjko V ., Wallden P., and Andersson E.,“Quantum digital signatures without quantum memory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 112, no. 4, p. 040502, 2014

2014
[196]

Quantum digital signatures with quantum-key-distribution components,

Wallden P., Dunjko V ., Kent A., and Andersson E., “Quantum digital signatures with quantum-key-distribution components,” Physical Review A, vol. 91, no. 4, p. 042304, 2015

2015
[197]

Quantum key agreement protocol,

Zhou N., Zeng G., and Xiong J., “Quantum key agreement protocol,” Electronics Letters, vol. 40, no. 18, p. 1, 2004

2004
[198]

Improvement on

Chong S.-K., Tsai C.-W., and Hwang T., “Improvement on "quantum key agreement protocol with maximally entangled states",” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1793–1802, 2011

2011
[199]

Multi-party quantum key agreement with Bell states and Bell measurements,

Shi R.-H. and Zhong H., “Multi-party quantum key agreement with Bell states and Bell measurements,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 921–932, 2013

2013
[200]

Multiparty quantum key agreement with single particles,

Liu B., Gao F., Huang W., and Wen Q.-y., “Multiparty quantum key agreement with single particles,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1797–1805, 2013. 238

2013
[201]

Quantum key agreement protocol based on bb84,

Chong S.-K. and Hwang T., “Quantum key agreement protocol based on bb84,” Optics Communications, vol. 283, no. 6, pp. 1192–1195, 2010

2010
[202]

Protocols of quantum key agreement solely using Bell states and Bell measurement,

Shukla C., Alam N., and Pathak A., “Protocols of quantum key agreement solely using Bell states and Bell measurement,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2391–2405, 2014

2014
[203]

Novel multiparty quantum key agreement protocol with GHZ states,

Xu G.-B., Wen Q.-Y ., Gao F., and Qin S.-J., “Novel multiparty quantum key agreement protocol with GHZ states,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2587– 2594, 2014

2014
[204]

Quantum key agreement protocols with four-qubit cluster states,

He Y .-F. and Ma W.-P., “Quantum key agreement protocols with four-qubit cluster states,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3483–3498, 2015

2015
[205]

Collusive attacks to

Liu B., Xiao D., Jia H.-Y ., and Liu R.-Z., “Collusive attacks to "circle-type" multi-party quantum key agreement protocols,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2113–2124, 2016

2016
[206]

Multiparty quantum key agree- ment,

Lin S., Zhang X., Guo G.-D., Wang L.-L., and Liu X.-F.,“Multiparty quantum key agree- ment,” Physical Review A, vol. 104, no. 4, p. 042421, 2021

2021
[207]

Controlled order rearrangement encryption for quantum key distribution,

Deng F.-G. and Long G.-L., “Controlled order rearrangement encryption for quantum key distribution,” Physical Review A, vol. 68, no. 4, p. 042315, 2003

2003
[208]

Monitoring and physical-layer attack mitigation in sdn-controlled quantum key dis- tribution networks,

Hugues-Salas E., Ntavou F., Gkounis D., Kanellos G. T., Nejabati R., and Simeonidou D., “Monitoring and physical-layer attack mitigation in sdn-controlled quantum key dis- tribution networks,” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. A209–A218, 2019

2019
[209]

A controlled quantum dialogue protocol in the network using entanglement swapping ,

Dong L., Xiu X.-M., Gao Y .-J., and Chi F., “A controlled quantum dialogue protocol in the network using entanglement swapping ,” Optics Communications, vol. 281, no. 24, pp. 6135–6138, 2008

2008
[210]

Controlled quantum dialogue using cluster states,

Kao S.-H. and Hwang T., “Controlled quantum dialogue using cluster states,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 16, p. 139, 2017. 239

2017
[211]

Quantum secure direct communication based on order rearrangement of single photons,

Wang J., Zhang Q., and Tang C.-j., “Quantum secure direct communication based on order rearrangement of single photons,” Physics Letters A, vol. 358, no. 4, pp. 256–258, 2006

2006
[212]

Controlled quantum secure direct communication with w state ,

Chen X.-B., Wen Q.-Y ., Guo F.-Z., Sun Y ., Xu G., and Zhu F.-C.,“Controlled quantum secure direct communication with w state ,” International Journal of Quantum Informa- tion, vol. 6, no. 04, pp. 899–906, 2008

2008
[213]

Bidirectional controlled quan- tum teleportation and secure direct communication using five-qubit entangled state ,

Li Y .-h., Li X.-l., Sang M.-h., Nie Y .-y., and Wang Z.-s.,“Bidirectional controlled quan- tum teleportation and secure direct communication using five-qubit entangled state ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 12, pp. 3835–3844, 2013

2013
[214]

Controlled quantum key agreement based on maximally three-qubit entangled states ,

Tang J., Shi L., and Wei J., “Controlled quantum key agreement based on maximally three-qubit entangled states ,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 34, no. 18, p. 2050201, 2020

2020
[215]

S., Game theory for applied economists

Gibbons R. S., Game theory for applied economists. Princeton University Press: Prince- ton, NJ, USA, 1992; ISBN 978-0-691-00395-5, 1992

1992
[216]

Game theory and political theory,

Ordeshook P. C. et al., “Game theory and political theory,” Cambridge Books, 1986

1986
[217]

M., Game theory and its applications: In the social and biological sciences

Colman A. M., Game theory and its applications: In the social and biological sciences . Psychology Press, 2013

2013
[218]

Phage-lift for game theory,

Nowak M. A. and Sigmund K., “Phage-lift for game theory,” Nature, vol. 398, no. 6726, pp. 367–368, 1999

1999
[219]

Rand, 1959

Dresher M., Some military applications of the Theory of Games. Rand, 1959

1959
[220]

Princeton University Press, 1997

Hardin R., One for all: The logic of group conflict. Princeton University Press, 1997

1997
[221]

Equilibrium points in n-person games ,

Nash Jr J. F., “Equilibrium points in n-person games ,” Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 48–49, 1950

1950
[222]

Non-cooperative games,

Nash J., “Non-cooperative games,” Annals of Mathematics, pp. 286–295, 1951

1951
[223]

Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities ,

Aspect A., Grangier P., and Roger G., “Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities ,” Physical Re- view Letters, vol. 49, no. 2, p. 91, 1982. 240

1982
[224]

E., Quantum Game Theory

Landsburg S. E., Quantum Game Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-0-470-40053-1, 2011

2011
[225]

Quantum strategies,

Meyer D. A., “Quantum strategies,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 5, p. 1052, 1999

1999
[226]

Quantum games and quantum strategies ,

Eisert J., Wilkens M., and Lewenstein M., “Quantum games and quantum strategies ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 83, no. 15, p. 3077, 1999

1999
[227]

A survey of quantum games ,

Guo H., Zhang J., and Koehler G. J., “A survey of quantum games ,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 318–332, 2008

2008
[228]

Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer ,

Du J., Li H., Xu X., Shi M., Wu J., Zhou X., and Han R., “Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 13, p. 137902, 2002

2002
[229]

Variations on the theme of the greenberger-horne-zeilinger proof,

Vaidman L., “Variations on the theme of the greenberger-horne-zeilinger proof,” Foun- dations of Physics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 615–630, 1999

1999
[230]

Quantum gambling ,

Goldenberg L., Vaidman L., and Wiesner S., “Quantum gambling ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 16, p. 3356, 1999

1999
[231]

Quantum games: States of play ,

Patel N., “Quantum games: States of play ,” Nature, vol. 445, no. 7124, pp. 144–147, 2007

2007
[232]

Quantum models of Parrondo’s games,

Flitney A. and Abbott D., “Quantum models of Parrondo’s games,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 324, no. 1-2, pp. 152–156, 2003

2003
[233]

Collective attack free controlled quantum key agreement with- out quantum memory,

Dutta A. and Pathak A., “Collective attack free controlled quantum key agreement with- out quantum memory,” Physica Scripta, vol. 100, no. 3, p. 035101, 2025

2025
[234]

Simultaneous quantum identity authentication scheme utiliz- ing entanglement swapping with secret key preservation,

Dutta A. and Pathak A., “Simultaneous quantum identity authentication scheme utiliz- ing entanglement swapping with secret key preservation,” Modern Physics Letters A, p. 2450196, 2025

2025
[235]

Quantum cloning, eavesdropping and Bell’s inequality ,

Gisin N. and Huttner B., “Quantum cloning, eavesdropping and Bell’s inequality ,” Physics Letters A, vol. 228, no. 1-2, pp. 13–21, 1997. 241

1997
[236]

Optimal cloning of pure states ,

Werner R. F., “Optimal cloning of pure states ,” Physical Review A, vol. 58, no. 3, p. 1827, 1998

1998
[237]

Mini-maximizing two qubit quantum computations ,

Khan F. S. and Phoenix S. J., “Mini-maximizing two qubit quantum computations ,” Quantum information processing, vol. 12, pp. 3807–3819, 2013

2013
[238]

Secure direct communication with a quantum one-time pad,

Deng F.-G. and Long G. L., “Secure direct communication with a quantum one-time pad,” Physical Review A, vol. 69, no. 5, p. 052319, 2004

2004
[239]

Quantum secure direct communication and deterministic secure quantum communication ,

Long G.-l., Deng F.-g., Wang C., Li X.-h., Wen K., and Wang W.-y., “Quantum secure direct communication and deterministic secure quantum communication ,” Frontiers of Physics in China, vol. 2, pp. 251–272, 2007

2007
[240]

Secure direct communication based on secret transmitting order of particles ,

Zhu A.-D., Xia Y ., Fan Q.-B., and Zhang S., “Secure direct communication based on secret transmitting order of particles ,” Physical Review A, vol. 73, no. 2, p. 022338, 2006

2006
[241]

Quantum key distribution protocol using dense cod- ing of three-qubit W state ,

Hwang T., Hwang C., and Tsai C., “Quantum key distribution protocol using dense cod- ing of three-qubit W state ,” The European Physical Journal D, vol. 61, pp. 785–790, 2011

2011
[242]

Secure communication with a publicly known key,

Beige A., Englert B., Kurtsiefer C., and Weinfurter H., “Secure communication with a publicly known key,” Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 3, no. 101, pp. 357–368, 2002

2002
[243]

Theoretically efficient high-capacity quantum-key- distribution scheme,

Long G.-L. and Liu X.-S., “Theoretically efficient high-capacity quantum-key- distribution scheme,” Physical Review A, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 032302, 2002

2002
[244]

Deterministic secure direct communication using entan- glement,

Boström K. and Felbinger T., “Deterministic secure direct communication using entan- glement,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, no. 18, p. 187902, 2002

2002
[245]

Two-step quantum direct communication proto- col using the einstein-podolsky-rosen pair block ,

Deng F.-G., Long G. L., and Liu X.-S., “Two-step quantum direct communication proto- col using the einstein-podolsky-rosen pair block ,” Physical Review A, vol. 68, no. 4, p. 042317, 2003

2003
[246]

Quantum dense key distribution,

Degiovanni I., Berchera I. R., Castelletto S., Rastello M. L., Bovino F., Colla A., and Castagnoli G., “Quantum dense key distribution,” Physical Review A, vol. 69, no. 3, p. 032310, 2004. 242

2004
[247]

Quantum secure direct communication with high-dimension quantum superdense coding ,

Wang C., Deng F.-G., Li Y .-S., Liu X.-S., and Long G. L., “Quantum secure direct communication with high-dimension quantum superdense coding ,” Physical Review A, vol. 71, no. 4, p. 044305, 2005

2005
[248]

Device-independent quantum secure direct com- munication against collective attacks,

Zhou L., Sheng Y .-B., and Long G.-L.,“Device-independent quantum secure direct com- munication against collective attacks,” Science Bulletin, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2020

2020
[249]

Security of quantum secure direct communication based on wyner’s wiretap channel theory ,

Wu J., Lin Z., Yin L., and Long G.-L.,“Security of quantum secure direct communication based on wyner’s wiretap channel theory ,” Quantum Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, p. e26, 2019

2019
[250]

Bidirectional quantum key distribution protocol with prac- tical faint laser pulses,

Deng F.-G. and Long G. L., “Bidirectional quantum key distribution protocol with prac- tical faint laser pulses,” Physical Review A, vol. 70, no. 1, p. 012311, 2004

2004
[251]

Ambiguous discrimination among linearly dependent quantum states and its application to two-way deterministic quantum key distribution,

Lu H., “Ambiguous discrimination among linearly dependent quantum states and its application to two-way deterministic quantum key distribution,” JOSA B, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. B26–B30, 2019

2019
[252]

Exper- imental quantum secure direct communication with single photons ,

Hu J.-Y ., Yu B., Jing M.-Y ., Xiao L.-T., Jia S.-T., Qin G.-Q., and Long G.-L., “Exper- imental quantum secure direct communication with single photons ,” Light: Science & Applications, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. e16 144–e16 144, 2016

2016
[253]

Experimental long-distance quantum secure direct communication,

Zhu F., Zhang W., Sheng Y ., and Huang Y .,“Experimental long-distance quantum secure direct communication,” Science Bulletin, vol. 62, no. 22, pp. 1519–1524, 2017

2017
[254]

Implementation and security analysis of practical quantum secure direct communica- tion,

Qi R., Sun Z., Lin Z., Niu P., Hao W., Song L., Huang Q., Gao J., Yin L., and Long G.-L., “Implementation and security analysis of practical quantum secure direct communica- tion,” Light: Science & Applications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 22, 2019

2019
[255]

Measurement-device- independent quantum secure direct communication,

Zhou Z., Sheng Y ., Niu P., Yin L., Long G., and Hanzo L., “Measurement-device- independent quantum secure direct communication,” Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, vol. 63, no. 3, p. 230362, 2020

2020
[256]

Experimental free-space quantum secure direct communication and its security analysis ,

Pan D., Lin Z., Wu J., Zhang H., Sun Z., Ruan D., Yin L., and Long G. L. ,“Experimental free-space quantum secure direct communication and its security analysis ,” Photonics Research, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1522–1531, 2020. 243

2020
[257]

Free-space quantum secure direct communication: basics, progress, and outlook ,

Pan D., Song X.-T., and Long G.-L., “Free-space quantum secure direct communication: basics, progress, and outlook ,” Advanced Devices & Instrumentation, vol. 4, p. 0004, 2023

2023
[258]

Measurement-device-independent quantum communication without encryption ,

Niu P.-H., Zhou Z.-R., Lin Z.-S., Sheng Y .-B., Yin L.-G., and Long G.-L., “Measurement-device-independent quantum communication without encryption ,” Sci- ence Bulletin, vol. 63, no. 20, pp. 1345–1350, 2018

2018
[259]

Use of nash equilibrium in finding game theoretic robust secu- rity bound on quantum bit error rate,

Dutta A. and Pathak A., “Use of nash equilibrium in finding game theoretic robust secu- rity bound on quantum bit error rate,” Physica Scripta, vol. 99, no. 9, p. 095106, 2024

2024
[260]

Trans- mission of photonic polarization states from geosynchronous earth orbit satellite to the ground,

Wang X.-f., Sun X.-j., Liu Y .-x., Wang W., Kan B.-x., Dong P., and Zhao L.-l., “Trans- mission of photonic polarization states from geosynchronous earth orbit satellite to the ground,” Quantum Engineering, vol. 3, no. 3, p. e73, 2021

2021
[261]

Reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution with modified coherent states,

She L.-G. and Zhang C.-M., “Reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution with modified coherent states,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 21, no. 5, p. 161, 2022

2022
[262]

Long-distance free-space measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution,

Cao Y ., Li Y .-H., Yang K.-X., Jiang Y .-F., Li S.-L., Hu X.-L., Abulizi M., Li C.-L., Zhang W., Sun Q.-C.et al., “Long-distance free-space measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 125, no. 26, p. 260503, 2020

2020
[263]

Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution ,

Jouguet P., Kunz-Jacques S., Leverrier A., Grangier P., and Diamanti E., “Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution ,” Nature Photonics, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 378–381, 2013

2013
[264]

Continuous-variable quantum key dis- tribution with non-gaussian operations,

Hu L., Al-Amri M., Liao Z., and Zubairy M., “Continuous-variable quantum key dis- tribution with non-gaussian operations,” Physical Review A, vol. 102, no. 1, p. 012608, 2020

2020
[265]

Twin-field quantum key distribution over 830-km fibre ,

Wang S., Yin Z.-Q., He D.-Y ., Chen W., Wang R.-Q., Ye P., Zhou Y ., Fan-Yuan G.-J., Wang F.-X., Chen W. et al., “Twin-field quantum key distribution over 830-km fibre ,” Nature Photonics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 154–161, 2022. 244

2022
[266]

Quantum identity authentication using a Hadamard gate based on a GHZ state ,

Jian L., Wang Y ., Chen G., Zhou Y ., and Liu S.,“Quantum identity authentication using a Hadamard gate based on a GHZ state ,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 56, no. 7, p. 075502, 2023

2023
[267]

Device-independent quantum authorization based on the clauser-horne-shimony-holt game,

Faleiro R. and Goulão M., “Device-independent quantum authorization based on the clauser-horne-shimony-holt game,” Physical Review A, vol. 103, no. 2, p. 022430, 2021

2021
[268]

A continuous- variable quantum secure direct communication protocol with squeezed states,

Paparelle I., Mousavi F., Scazza F., Paris M., Bassi A., and Zavatta A., “A continuous- variable quantum secure direct communication protocol with squeezed states,” in Euro- pean Quantum Electronics Conference. Optica Publishing Group, 2023, p. eb_5_4

2023
[269]

Efficient protocols for unidirectional and bidirectional controlled determin- istic secure quantum communication: different alternative approaches,

Pathak A., “Efficient protocols for unidirectional and bidirectional controlled determin- istic secure quantum communication: different alternative approaches,” Quantum Infor- mation Processing, vol. 14, pp. 2195–2210, 2015

2015
[270]

Insecurity of quantum secure computations ,

Lo H.-K., “Insecurity of quantum secure computations ,” Physical Review A, vol. 56, no. 2, p. 1154, 1997

1997
[271]

Why quantum bit commitment and ideal quantum coin tossing are impossible,

Lo H.-K. and Chau H. F., “Why quantum bit commitment and ideal quantum coin tossing are impossible,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 120, no. 1-2, pp. 177–187, 1998

1998
[272]

Complete insecurity of quantum proto- cols for classical two-party computation ,

Buhrman H., Christandl M., and Schaffner C., “Complete insecurity of quantum proto- cols for classical two-party computation ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 16, p. 160501, 2012

2012
[273]

Impossibility of secure two-party classical computation,

Colbeck R., “Impossibility of secure two-party classical computation,” Physical Review A, vol. 76, no. 6, p. 062308, 2007

2007
[274]

Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum commu- nication channel,

Holevo A. S., “Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum commu- nication channel,” Problemy Peredachi Informatsii, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3–11, 1973

1973
[275]

A survey of information authentication ,

Simmons G. J., “A survey of information authentication ,” Proceedings of The IEEE, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 603–620, 1988

1988
[276]

Beyond the goldenberg–vaidman protocol: se- cure and efficient quantum communication using arbitrary, orthogonal, multi-particle quantum states ,

Shukla C., Pathak A., and Srikanth R., “Beyond the goldenberg–vaidman protocol: se- cure and efficient quantum communication using arbitrary, orthogonal, multi-particle quantum states ,” International Journal of Quantum Information, vol. 10, no. 08, p. 1241009, 2012. 245

2012
[277]

Decoy state quantum key distribution,

Lo H.-K., Ma X., and Chen K., “Decoy state quantum key distribution,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 23, p. 230504, 2005

2005
[278]

A generic security proof for quantum key dis- tribution,

Christandl M., Renner R., and Ekert A., “A generic security proof for quantum key dis- tribution,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0402131, 2004

2004 arXiv
[279]

Multipartite quantum key agreement over collective noise channels,

Cai B., Guo G., Lin S., Zuo H., and Yu C., “Multipartite quantum key agreement over collective noise channels,” IEEE Photonics Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018

2018
[280]

Two-party quantum key agreement against collective noise ,

He Y .-F. and Ma W.-P., “Two-party quantum key agreement against collective noise ,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 5023–5035, 2016

2016
[281]

Quantum key agreement with epr pairs and single-particle measurements,

Huang W., Wen Q.-Y ., Liu B., Gao F., and Sun Y ., “Quantum key agreement with epr pairs and single-particle measurements,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 13, pp. 649–663, 2014

2014
[282]

Decoherence-free subspaces in quantum key distribution ,

Walton Z. D., Abouraddy A. F., Sergienko A. V ., Saleh B. E., and Teich M. C., “Decoherence-free subspaces in quantum key distribution ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 8, p. 087901, 2003

2003
[283]

Heralded nonlocal quantum gates for distributed quantum computation in a decoherence-free subspace,

Su W., Qin W., Miranowicz A., Li T., and Nori F., “Heralded nonlocal quantum gates for distributed quantum computation in a decoherence-free subspace,” Physical Review A, vol. 110, no. 5, p. 052612, 2024

2024
[284]

Exponentially improved dispersive qubit readout with squeezed light,

Qin W., Miranowicz A., and Nori F., “Exponentially improved dispersive qubit readout with squeezed light,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 133, no. 23, p. 233605, 2024

2024
[285]

Two robust quantum key agreement protocols based on logical ghz states,

He Y . and Ma W., “Two robust quantum key agreement protocols based on logical ghz states,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 31, no. 03, p. 1750015, 2017

2017
[286]

Two-party quantum key agreement protocols under collective noise channel,

Gao H., Chen X.-G., and Qian S.-R., “Two-party quantum key agreement protocols under collective noise channel,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 17, p. 140, 2018

2018
[287]

Efficient quantum key distribution over a collec- tive noise channel,

Li X.-H., Deng F.-G., and Zhou H.-Y .,“Efficient quantum key distribution over a collec- tive noise channel,” Physical Review A, vol. 78, no. 2, p. 022321, 2008

2008
[288]

Blind quantum computation over a collective-noise channel,

Takeuchi Y ., Fujii K., Ikuta R., Yamamoto T., and Imoto N.,“Blind quantum computation over a collective-noise channel,” Physical Review A, vol. 93, no. 5, p. 052307, 2016. 246

2016
[289]

Deterministic secure quantum communication against collective noise,

Wang P., Chen X., and Sun Z., “Deterministic secure quantum communication against collective noise,” Physics Letters A, vol. 446, p. 128291, 2022

2022
[290]

A noise immunity controlled quantum teleportation protocol,

Li D.-f., Wang R.-j., Zhang F.-l., Baagyere E., Qin Z., Xiong H., and Zhan H., “A noise immunity controlled quantum teleportation protocol,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 15, pp. 4819–4837, 2016

2016
[291]

Response to

Kang M.-S., Heo J., Hong C.-H., Yang H.-J., Moon S., and Han S.-W., “Response to "Comment on ’Controlled mutual quantum entity authentication with an untrusted third party’",” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 19, p. 24, 2020

2020
[292]

Semi-quantum mutual identity authentication using Bell states,

Jiang S., Zhou R.-G., and Hu W., “Semi-quantum mutual identity authentication using Bell states,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 60, pp. 3353–3362, 2021

2021
[293]

Multi-party quantum key agreement pro- tocol with authentication,

Wu Y .-T., Chang H., Guo G.-D., and Lin S., “Multi-party quantum key agreement pro- tocol with authentication,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, pp. 4066–4077, 2021

2021
[294]

Which verification qubits perform best for secure communication in noisy channel?

Sharma R. D., Thapliyal K., Pathak A., Pan A. K., and De A., “Which verification qubits perform best for secure communication in noisy channel? ” Quantum Information Pro- cessing, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1703–1718, 2016

2016
[295]

Creation of memory–memory entanglement in a metropolitan quantum network,

Liu J.-L., Luo X.-Y ., Yu Y ., Wang C.-Y ., Wang B., Hu Y ., Li J., Zheng M.-Y ., Yao B., Yan Z. et al., “Creation of memory–memory entanglement in a metropolitan quantum network,” Nature, vol. 629, no. 8012, pp. 579–585, 2024

2024
[296]

Experimental authentication of quantum key distribution with post-quantum cryptography ,

Wang L.-J., Zhang K.-Y ., Wang J.-Y ., Cheng J., Yang Y .-H., Tang S.-B., Yan D., Tang Y .- L., Liu Z., Yu Y ., Zhang Q., and Pan J.-W.,“Experimental authentication of quantum key distribution with post-quantum cryptography ,” npj Quantum Information, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 67, 2021

2021
[297]

Post-quantum authentication schemes,

Mendiola M. A., Gillis J. T., Binder A. J., and Haddad R., “Post-quantum authentication schemes,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2020), 2020, pp. 3812–3825. 247

2020
[298]

Lower and upper bounds on the secret-key rate for quantum key distribution protocols using one-way classical communication ,

Kraus B., Gisin N., and Renner R., “Lower and upper bounds on the secret-key rate for quantum key distribution protocols using one-way classical communication ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 8, p. 080501, 2005

2005
[299]

Information-theoretic security proof for quantum- key-distribution protocols,

Renner R., Gisin N., and Kraus B., “Information-theoretic security proof for quantum- key-distribution protocols,” Physical Review A, vol. 72, no. 1, p. 012332, 2005

2005
[2005]

IEEE, 2005, pp. 19–23. 222

2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Satellite-relayed intercontinental quantum network ,

Liao S.-K., Cai W.-Q., Handsteiner J., Liu B., Yin J., Zhang L., Rauch D., Fink M., Ren J.-G., Liu W.-Y .et al., “Satellite-relayed intercontinental quantum network ,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, no. 3, p. 030501, 2018

2018

[2] [2]

Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance,

Liu Y ., Zhang W.-J., Jiang C., Chen J.-P., Zhang C., Pan W.-X., Ma D., Dong H., Xiong J.-M., Zhang C.-J. et al., “Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 130, no. 21, p. 210801, 2023

2023

[3] [3]

Recent advances in post-quantum cryptography for networks: A survey ,

Zeydan E., Turk Y ., Aksoy B., and Ozturk S. B., “Recent advances in post-quantum cryptography for networks: A survey ,” in 2022 Seventh International Conference On Mobile And Secure Services (MobiSecServ). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–8

2022

[4] [4]

Quantum communication with RLP quantum resistant cryptography in industrial manufacturing ,

Senapati B. and Rawal B. S., “Quantum communication with RLP quantum resistant cryptography in industrial manufacturing ,” Cyber Security and Applications, vol. 1, p. 100019, 2023

2023

[5] [5]

DPCrypto: Acceleration of post-quantum cryptography using dot-product instructions on GPUs ,

Lee W.-K., Seo H., Hwang S. O., Achar R., Karmakar A., and Mera J. M. B.,“DPCrypto: Acceleration of post-quantum cryptography using dot-product instructions on GPUs ,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 3591– 3604, 2022

2022

[6] [6]

On the law of distribution of energy in the normal spectrum ,

Planck M., “On the law of distribution of energy in the normal spectrum ,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 4, no. 553, p. 1, 1901

1901

[7] [7]

Über einen die erzeugung und verwandlung des lichtes betreffenden heuris- tischen gesichtspunkt,

Einstein A., “Über einen die erzeugung und verwandlung des lichtes betreffenden heuris- tischen gesichtspunkt,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 322, no. 6, pp. 132–148, 1905

1905

[8] [8]

Classical light vs. nonclassical light: characterizations and interesting applications,

Pathak A. and Ghatak A., “Classical light vs. nonclassical light: characterizations and interesting applications,” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 229–264, 2018. 220

2018