Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Effects of planetary mass uncertainties on the interpretation of the reflectance spectra of Earth-like exoplanets

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Reflected-light retrievals misidentify the dominant gas of cloudy Earth-like planets unless the mass is known to about 10%.

desk verdict Useful retrieval study with a concrete, actionable claim (mass prior ~10% for background gas ID), but the headline result rests on a fixed cloud fraction and a single noise realization, so treat the quantitative threshold as provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01513 v1 pith:7FURIFMC submitted 2025-02-03 astro-ph.EP

Mario Damiano , Zachary Burr , Renyu Hu , Jennifer Burt , Tiffany Kataria This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords exoplanetatmospheresreflectedlightspectroscopyatmosphericretrievalBayesianinferenceplanetarymassbiosignaturescloudsEarthanalogs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether knowing a planet's mass matters for reading its atmosphere from reflected starlight, the technique planned for the Habitable Worlds Observatory. It runs simulated observations of modern Earth (with and without clouds) and Archean Earth through the ExoReL retrieval code under five mass-prior scenarios. The finding is that for cloudy planets, mass must be known to about 10% (a 10-sigma measurement) for the retrieval to name the dominant gas correctly; with looser or unknown mass, modern Earth's nitrogen is mistaken for oxygen and Archean Earth's nitrogen for carbon dioxide. Because oxygen is a proposed biosignature, the misidentification could produce false habitability claims. The cause is a degeneracy: uncertain mass changes surface gravity and scale height, and the retrieval compensates by adjusting the atmosphere's mean molecular weight.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the mass$-$scale-height$-$composition degeneracy. In reflected light the spectrum constrains column abundances, approximately partial pressure over surface gravity ($P/g$), and scale height $H = kT/(\mu g)$ folds the planet's mass into the gas mean molecular mass $\mu$. When the mass is uncertain, the retrieval can keep the spectrum unchanged by trading mass against $\mu$, so a nitrogen-dominated air column is re-labeled as oxygen or carbon dioxide. This trade is enabled by three upgrades: composition-dependent Rayleigh scattering (so the slope carries information about $\mu$), partial pressures as free parameters (so no filler gas is assumed), and a 1.5D two-column cloud model with 25% cloud fraction (so patchy clouds mute the Rayleigh slope).

What would settle it

Run the same mock-observation retrieval suite with cloud fraction as a free parameter, or with spectra from a 3D cloudy atmosphere, and check whether nitrogen still gets misidentified as oxygen under a flat mass prior; if the background gas is then recovered, the 10% mass requirement is an artifact of the fixed 25% cloud fraction rather than a property of real cloudy planets.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the paper's own terms: using the Bayesian retrieval framework ExoReL with composition-dependent Rayleigh scattering, adaptive vertical layering, and partial pressures as free parameters, the authors show that reflected-light spectra of cloudy Earth-like planets only yield the correct background gas when the mass prior is a Gaussian with 10% width. Without that precision, the retrieved mass drops toward 0.5 Earth masses, the radius inflates to about 1.1 Earth radii, and the dominant gas switches from the true N$_2$ to O$_2$ (modern case) or CO$_2$ (Archean case). The same suite on a cloud-free modern Earth succeeds under all priors, isolating clouds as the condition that hides the Rayleigh slope needed to pin down the invisible background gas. The authors conclude that mass measurements accurate to roughly 10%, from extreme-precision radial velocity or astrometry, should be a prerequisite for biosignature interpretation with future direct-imaging missions.

Load-bearing premise

The result assumes the simplified cloud treatment, two atmospheric columns with a fixed 25% cloud cover, captures how real patchy water clouds hide the Rayleigh scattering slope; if that fails, the mass threshold could shift or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For cloudy terrestrial exoplanets, a 10% mass prior becomes a practical requirement for reflected-light characterization, not a refinement.
  • Without such a prior, a modern Earth analog could be reported as an oxygen-dominated planet, which would look like a strong false-positive biosignature.
  • Archean Earth analogs could be misread as carbon-dioxide-dominated, erasing the methane/CO$_2$ disequilibrium that marks a biosphere.
  • Cloud-free planets are safe: their Rayleigh slopes survive and the mass can be co-retrieved from the spectrum alone.
  • Precursor extreme-precision radial velocity or astrometry programs targeting Habitable Worlds Observatory candidates should aim for 10% mass errors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 10% threshold was derived at one signal-to-noise level (SNR 20 at 0.75 $\mu$m) and fixed spectral resolution; the same degeneracy may persist or relax at higher SNR, and the paper does not map that boundary.
  • The mass$\mu$ trade is not specific to N$_2$/O$_2$/CO$_2$: comparable misidentifications could affect super-Earth and sub-Neptune retrievals where H$_2$ or He is the invisible background gas.
  • A practical test: apply the same retrieval suite to real Earthshine spectra with deliberately mis-specified mass priors to see whether the O$_2$-for-N$_2$ swap reproduces in data rather than only in simulated spectra.
  • Because clouds are the trigger, better cloud constraints (e.g., phase curves or polarimetry) might reduce the mass precision needed, a possibility the authors deferred to a companion study.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper investigates how prior knowledge of planetary mass affects atmospheric retrievals of Earth-like exoplanets in reflected light. Using an upgraded version of the ExoReL retrieval framework that includes composition-dependent Rayleigh scattering, a two-column treatment with fixed 25% cloud fraction, partial-pressure sampling, an adaptive vertical grid, and a new noise model, the authors generate simulated NUV-VIS-NIR spectra of cloud-free modern Earth, cloudy modern Earth, and Archean Earth analogs and retrieve them under five mass-prior scenarios: perfect knowledge, unknown, a physically motivated 2D mass-radius prior, and Gaussian priors with 30% and 10% width. In the cloud-free case the composition is recovered in all scenarios. In the cloudy modern-Earth case, the unknown, 2D, and 30%-Gaussian priors bias the retrieved mass low and cause N2 to be replaced by O2 as the dominant gas; in the Archean case N2 is replaced by CO2. Only the 10% Gaussian prior recovers the correct composition. The authors conclude that mass constraints near 10% (about 10 sigma) are needed to avoid misidentifying the background gas and to correctly interpret potential biosignatures with the Habitable Worlds Observatory.

Significance. If the central result is robust, it is directly relevant to HWO target selection and precursor radial-velocity or astrometry campaigns, and it identifies a concrete failure mode—background-gas misidentification—that could produce false-positive O2-dominated atmospheric interpretations. The study is a well-structured simulation experiment with known truth, so no fitted constant is presented as a prediction; the strengths are the clearly described setup, the physically motivated prior, and the quantitative reporting of posterior ranges in Tables 3 and 4. However, the headline claim rests on a forward model in which cloud fraction is fixed at its truth value (Section 2.1.1), and the paper defers the free-cloud-fraction case to a companion study; until that degeneracy is explored, the 10% mass-prior requirement is conditional rather than established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.1.1; Tables 3 and 4] The cloud fraction is fixed at 25% in both the forward model and the retrievals, and Section 2.1.2 states that clouds mute the Rayleigh scattering slope, which is the primary observable for identifying the background gas. Because cloud fraction affects the amplitude of the Rayleigh slope, a retrieval with free cloud fraction could reduce the cloud fraction to steepen that slope and compensate for an incorrect mass or surface gravity, potentially retaining N2 as the dominant gas. The reported composition flips in Tables 3 and 4 may therefore be an artifact of fixing cloud fraction to its true value rather than a general consequence of mass uncertainty. This concern is explicitly acknowledged by the authors as deferred to a companion study, but it directly bears on the central conclusion that mass must be known to 10%. I request that the authors rerun the Modern and Archean Earth retrievals with cloud fraction as a free parameter (or with a prior that includes the true value) and report whether the misidentification persists, or alternatively temper the headline claim to explicitly state the dependence on the fixed cloud fraction.
  2. [Section 2.3 and Section 5] The quantitative recommendation that mass should be known to within 10% is derived from retrievals of a single synthetic noise realization at a signal-to-noise ratio of 20 at 0.75 microns. The paper does not examine how the threshold depends on the random noise seed, the overall SNR, or the noise color, although the new noise model itself allows such variations through the parameters alpha and beta in Appendix A. Because the abstract and conclusion present '10% uncertainty' as a robust observational requirement, the authors should either justify that the single realization is representative (for example, by repeating the key experiments with several noise seeds or at one additional SNR) or explicitly limit the claim to the specific noise realization used here.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.1.1] The choice of 25% for the fixed cloud fraction is not physically justified in the main text; a sentence explaining the rationale (or a statement that the value is illustrative pending the companion study) would help the reader interpret the results.
  2. [Table 1 and Section 2.1.5] The text says the Gaussian priors correspond to a '3.3 sigma or 10 sigma detection,' while the tables label them 'Gaussian prior (30%)' and 'Gaussian prior (10%)'. These are consistent only if the reader knows that sigma is defined relative to the mean (e.g., 1/0.3 ≈ 3.3), so please state this equivalence explicitly to avoid confusion.
  3. [Section 2.2] The MultiNest settings (2000 live points, evidence tolerance 0.5) are reported, but there is no convergence check; running one scenario with a larger live-point count (e.g., 4000) or reporting the Bayesian evidence with a second sampler would strengthen confidence in the posteriors shown in Figures 3-10.
  4. [Software section] The paper does not indicate whether the upgraded ExoReL code is publicly available; adding an availability statement or a link to a repository would improve reproducibility, especially since the study introduces several new features (cloud fraction, adaptive grid, partial-pressure sampling).
  5. [Figures 2 and 3-10] The spectral feature labels in Figure 2 are small and overlapping at the displayed size, and the captions for the posterior corner plots could define the derived 'surface pressure' quantity in the caption itself rather than only in Section 2.1.4.
  6. [Text typos] There are several typographical errors, including 'Moden' (Section 3.2), 'errobars' (Section 4.1), and 'Archaen' (Section 4.2 and elsewhere); a careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; controlled simulation experiment with known truth.

full rationale

This paper is a controlled simulation experiment, not a derivation from fitted data: synthetic reflected-light spectra are generated from known Modern/Archean Earth model atmospheres (Tables 2-4), noise is added by an analytic model normalized to SNR=20 (Appendix A), and ExoReL retrievals are run against these simulated observations under different mass priors. The headline claim - that looser mass priors lead to misidentification of the background gas while a 10% Gaussian prior recovers N2 - is read directly from posterior distributions of an internally consistent forward+inverse model, with truth values known by construction. No fitted constant is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing step is justified by a self-citation: the cited ExoReL papers (Damiano & Hu 2020, 2022; Damiano et al. 2023) provide the retrieval code and cloud/radiative-transfer formulation, but the present paper's conclusion is produced by running that code on synthetic data, not by importing a uniqueness theorem or ansatz. The paper explicitly flags the fixed 25% cloud fraction and defers its marginalization to a companion study (Burr et al., in prep.); even if this limitation could affect generalization to real cloudy planets, it is a model assumption explicitly acknowledged by the authors, not a circular step. The 2D mass-radius prior is adopted from Zeng et al. (2016), an external reference, and the mass-composition degeneracy is diagnosed from the retrieval posteriors rather than assumed. Accordingly, no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the fidelity of the ExoReL forward model, the simplified two-column cloud treatment, the analytic photon-noise model, and the chosen priors. The most consequential ad hoc choices are the fixed 25% cloud fraction and the single SNR=20 noise realization.

free parameters (4)
  • Cloud fraction = 25% (fixed, not retrieved)
    Section 2.1.1 fixes cloud fraction to 25%; the central misidentification effect is attributed to clouds muting the Rayleigh slope, so this hand-set value is load-bearing.
  • Noise model scaling parameters alpha and beta = alpha chosen so Fp=2*alpha*Fs*lambda^2 at 0.75 um; beta scales SNR to 20 at 0.75 um
    Appendix A: these parameters set the wavelength-dependent noise color and overall SNR. The study does not test other SNR values.
  • Partial pressure prior bounds = Log-uniform 10^-7 to 10^7 Pa
    Table 1: the extremely wide priors on gas partial pressures give the retrieval freedom to replace N2 with O2 or CO2, which is central to the misidentification result.
  • Mass and radius prior bounds = Mass U(0.01, 20) M_E; radius U(0.5, 10) R_E, or U(0.58, 2.2) R_E with 2D prior
    Table 1 and Section 2.1.5: the allowed mass-radius space defines the degeneracy that drives the background-gas bias.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption ExoReL radiative transfer model accurately computes reflected-light spectra of Earth-like atmospheres
    Section 2: the forward model is the basis for both the synthetic data and the retrievals; no independent benchmark is provided in this paper.
  • domain assumption The 1.5D two-column cloud model with linear averaging weighted by cloud fraction approximates real patchy clouds
    Section 2.1.1: this treatment is new and the cloud fraction is fixed, not marginalized.
  • domain assumption The analytic photon-noise model (planet plus exozodi, no speckles or dark current) represents HWO-like observations
    Appendix A: the authors state this is a 'simple limiting case' and that a full noise model would change the color of noise.
  • standard math MultiNest nested sampling with 2000 live points and evidence tolerance 0.5 converges to the true posterior
    Section 2.2: convergence is assumed based on the sampler's standard usage; no convergence diagnostics are shown.
  • domain assumption The Zeng et al. (2016) mass-radius relations bound physically plausible terrestrial planets
    Section 2.1.5: the 2D prior restricts mass and radius to the range between 100% iron and 100% water-ice compositions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effects of planetary mass uncertainties on the interpretation of the reflectance spectra of Earth-like exoplanets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7FURIFMC

@misc{pith2026250201513,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effects of planetary mass uncertainties on the interpretation of the reflectance spectra of Earth-like exoplanets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7FURIFMC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01513}
}
abstract

Atmospheric characterization of Earth-like exoplanets through reflected light spectroscopy is a key goal for upcoming direct imaging missions. A critical challenge in this endeavor is the accurate determination of planetary mass, which may influence the measurement of atmospheric compositions and the identification of potential biosignatures. In this study, we used the Bayesian retrieval framework ExoReL$^\Re$ to investigate the impact of planetary mass uncertainties on the atmospheric characterization of terrestrial exoplanets observed in reflected light. Our results indicate that precise prior knowledge of the planetary mass can be crucial for accurate atmospheric retrievals if clouds are present in the atmosphere. When the planetary mass is known within 10\% uncertainty, our retrievals successfully identified the background atmospheric gas and accurately constrained atmospheric parameters together with clouds. However, with less constrained or unknown planetary mass, we observed significant biases, particularly in the misidentification of the dominant atmospheric gas. For instance, the dominant gas was incorrectly identified as oxygen for a modern-Earth-like planet or carbon dioxide for an Archean-Earth-like planet, potentially leading to erroneous assessments of planetary habitability and biosignatures. These biases arise because, the uncertainties in planetary mass affect the determination of surface gravity and atmospheric scale height, leading the retrieval algorithm to compensate by adjusting the atmospheric composition. Our findings emphasize the importance of achieving precise mass measurements-ideally within 10\% uncertainty-through methods such as extreme precision radial velocity or astrometry, especially for future missions like the Habitable Worlds Observatory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01513 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mass radius relations used for the 2D prior (Zeng et al. 2016). The shaded region shows the full search space of the retrieval when using this prior function. The radius is chosen from a uniform distribution between 0.58 and 2.2 R⊕, then the mass is chosen from a uniform distribution between the corresponding mass for a 100% water ice planet and a 100% iron planet with this radius. For example for a radius of 1.25 R… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simulated spectra and data models for the Modern and Archean Earth-like scenarios. The datapoints are obtained by binning the synthesized model and by applying Gaussian noise and errobars as defined in section A. Top panel Modern Earth-like. Bottom panel Archean Earth-like [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Posterior distribution functions for planetary mass, radius, and surface pressure for the cloud free Mod￾ern Earth-like scenario. The surface pressure is a proxy for the atmospheric gases collectively as the sum of their partial pressure is equal to the surface pressure. was retrieved at a higher altitude by about an order of magnitude. Again, we observe correlations between the planetary mass, radius, and surface p… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Posterior distribution functions of the Bayesian analysis on the cloud free Modern Earth-like reflected spectrum of all scenarios defined in subsubsection 2.1.5 mass. With a flat prior on the mass, we find a broad posterior distribution centered at larger values (i.e.,…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Posterior distribution functions for planetary mass, radius, and surface pressure for the Modern Earth-like scenario. The surface pressure is a proxy for the atmospheric gases collectively as the sum of their partial pressure is equal to the surface pressure. Modern Ea…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Posterior distribution functions for planetary mass, radius, surface pressure, and particle size for the Mod￾ern Earth-like scenario. The surface pressure is a proxy for the atmospheric gases collectively as the sum of their partial pressure is equal to the surface pre…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Posterior distribution functions of the Bayesian analysis on the Modern Earth-like reflected spectrum of all the scenarios defined in Section 2.1.5. derivation of the planet’s minimum mass (Mp sin(i)), where i is the inclination of the planet’s orbital plane relative t…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Posterior distribution functions for planetary mass, radius, and surface pressure for the Archean Earth￾like scenario. Note that the surface pressure is a proxy for the atmospheric gases collectively as the sum of their partial pressure is equal to the surface pressure…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Posterior distribution functions for planetary mass, radius, surface pressure, and particle size for the Archean Earth-like scenario. The surface pressure is a proxy for the atmospheric gases collectively as the sum of their par￾tial pressure is equal to the surface pr…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Posterior distribution functions of the Bayesian analysis on the Archean Earth-like reflected spectrum of all the scenarios defined in Section 2.1.5. atmospheric parameters, even in the presence of clouds. However, with less constrained or unknown mass, we ob￾served s…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: SNR vs. λ for the modern and Archean Earth scenarios. The SNR is set to be 20 at 0.75µm. The jump at 1µm is due to the fact that in the NIR the spectral resolu￾tion decreases from R=140 to R=70. Similarly, the jump at 0.4µm is due to the drop in spectral resolution in…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Revisiting TOI-4438 and TOI-442 planetary systems with new observations from SPIRou and TESS

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Refined masses and radii for TOI-4438 b and TOI-442 b, stellar rotation periods from magnetic variability, and a single-transit planet candidate around TOI-4438.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    NEAT: a space born astrometric mission for the detection and characterization of nearby habitable planetary systems

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  5. [5]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  6. [6]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  7. [7]

    E., Lewis , T., Fortney , J

    Batalha , N. E., Lewis , T., Fortney , J. J., et al. 2019 a , ApJL, 885, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4909

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab4909 2019

  8. [8]

    E., Marley , M

    Batalha , N. E., Marley , M. S., Lewis , N. K., & Fortney , J. J. 2019 b , , 878, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b51

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b51 2019

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    G., & Gaudi , B

    Beatty , T. G., & Gaudi , B. S. 2015, , 127, 1240, 10.1086/684264

    2015 doi

  2. [10]

    2012, , 753, 100, 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/100

    Benneke , B., & Seager , S. 2012, , 753, 100, 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/100

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    2014, , 564, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971

    Buchner , J., Georgakakis , A., Nandra , K., et al. 2014, , 564, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    2019, , 487, 1082, 10.1093/mnras/stz1215

    Collier Cameron , A., Mortier , A., Phillips , D., et al. 2019, , 487, 1082, 10.1093/mnras/stz1215

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    S., Leifer , S., et al

    Crass , J., Gaudi , B. S., Leifer , S., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2107.14291, 10.48550/arXiv.2107.14291

    2021 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    2023, , 678, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347232

    Cretignier , M., Dumusque , X., Aigrain , S., & Pepe , F. 2023, , 678, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347232

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Dalcin, L., & Fang, Y.-L. L. 2021, Computing in Science & Engineering, 23, 47, 10.1109/MCSE.2021.3083216

    2021

  8. [16]

    2020, , 159, 175, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab79a5

    Damiano , M., & Hu , R. 2020, , 159, 175, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab79a5

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    2021, , 162, 200, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac224d

    ---. 2021, , 162, 200, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac224d

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    2022, , 163, 299, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac6b97

    ---. 2022, , 163, 299, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac6b97

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    2023, , 166, 157, 10.3847/1538-3881/acefd3

    Damiano , M., Hu , R., & Mennesson , B. 2023, , 166, 157, 10.3847/1538-3881/acefd3

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    P., & Bridges, M

    Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P., & Bridges, M. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398, 1601, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14548.x

    2009

  13. [21]

    S., Seager , S., Mennesson , B., et al

    Gaudi , B. S., Seager , S., Mennesson , B., et al. 2020, arXiv, arXiv:2001.06683, 10.48550/arXiv.2001.06683

    2020 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    R., Howard , A

    Gibson , S. R., Howard , A. W., Rider , K., et al. 2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 13096, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, ed. J. J. Bryant , K. Motohara , & J. R. D. Vernet , 1309609, 10.1117...

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    E., Schwieterman, E

    Harman, C. E., Schwieterman, E. W., Schottelkotte, J. C., & Kasting, J. F. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 812, 137, 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/137

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 166

    Hu, R. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 166

    2019

  17. [25]

    2021, JATIS, 7, 021205, 10.1117/1.JATIS.7.2.021205

    Hu , R., Lisman , D., Shaklan , S., et al. 2021, JATIS, 7, 021205, 10.1117/1.JATIS.7.2.021205

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    2014, , 784, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/63

    Hu , R., & Seager , S. 2014, , 784, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/63

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  20. [28]

    A., Collier Cameron , A., Faria , J

    John , A. A., Collier Cameron , A., Faria , J. P., et al. 2023, , 525, 1687, 10.1093/mnras/stad2381

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    2010, in Exoplanets, ed

    Lovis , C., & Fischer , D. 2010, in Exoplanets, ed. S. Seager , 27--53

    2010

  22. [30]

    K., Ford , E

    Luhn , J. K., Ford , E. B., Guo , Z., et al. 2023, , 165, 98, 10.3847/1538-3881/acad08

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Malbet , F., Goullioud , R., Lagage , P.-O., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8442, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. M. C. Clampin , G. G. Fazio , H. A. MacEw...

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.12414, 10.48550/arXiv.2402.12414

    Mamajek , E., & Stapelfeldt , K. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.12414, 10.48550/arXiv.2402.12414

    2024 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Meadows , V. S. 2017, Astrobiology, 17, 1022, 10.1089/ast.2016.1578

    2017

  26. [34]

    Meunier , N., Desort , M., & Lagrange , A. M. 2010, , 512, A39, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913551

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    2023, JATIS, 9, 016003, 10.1117/1.JATIS.9.1.016003

    Morrissey , P., Harding , L., Bush , N., et al. 2023, JATIS, 9, 016003, 10.1117/1.JATIS.9.1.016003

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    2021, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press), 10.17226/26141

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . 2021, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press), 10.17226/26141

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    2015, Guide to NumPy (Continuum Press)

    Oliphant, T. 2015, Guide to NumPy (Continuum Press). https://books.google.com/books?id=g58ljgEACAAJ

    2015

  30. [38]

    2021, , 645, A96, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038306

    Pepe , F., Cristiani , S., Rebolo , R., et al. 2021, , 645, A96, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038306

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    R., Ong , J

    Petersburg , R. R., Ong , J. M. J., Zhao , L. L., et al. 2020, , 159, 187, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7e31

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    J., Caballero , J

    Quirrenbach , A., Amado , P. J., Caballero , J. A., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, ed. S. K. Ramsay , I. S. McLean , & H. Takami , 91471F, 10.111...

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    Roberge , A., & Moustakas , L. A. 2018, NatAs, 2, 605, 10.1038/s41550-018-0543-8

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    D., Stapelfeldt , K

    Robinson , T. D., Stapelfeldt , K. R., & Marley , M. S. 2016, PASP, 128, 025003, 10.1088/1538-3873/128/960/025003

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    D., Fortney , J

    Salvador , A., Robinson , T. D., Fortney , J. J., & Marley , M. S. 2024, , 969, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad54c5

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Schwab , C., Rakich , A., Gong , Q., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, ed. C. J. Evans , L. Simard , & H. Takami , 99087H, 10.1117/12.2234411

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    J., Booth , J., et al

    Seager , S., Kasdin , N. J., Booth , J., et al. 2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 51, 106

    2019

  38. [46]

    I., Bisikalo , D

    Spro , L., Scherf , M., Shematovich , V. I., Bisikalo , D. V., & Lammer , H. 2021, Astronomy Reports, 65, 275, 10.1134/S1063772921040077

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    C., Belikov , R., Bolcar , M

    Stark , C. C., Belikov , R., Bolcar , M. R., et al. 2019, JATIS, 5, 024009, 10.1117/1.JATIS.5.2.024009

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    C., Shao , M., Tanner , A

    Unwin , S. C., Shao , M., Tanner , A. M., et al. 2008, , 120, 38, 10.1086/525059

    2008 doi

  41. [49]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    2014, , 785, L20, 10.1088/2041-8205/785/2/L20

    Wordsworth , R., & Pierrehumbert , R. 2014, , 785, L20, 10.1088/2041-8205/785/2/L20

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    D., & Jacobsen , S

    Zeng , L., Sasselov , D. D., & Jacobsen , S. B. 2016, ApJ, 819, 127, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/127

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.