REVIEW 3 cited by
Potential and limitations of random Fourier features for dequantizing quantum machine learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Quantum machine learning is arguably one of the most explored applications of near-term quantum devices. Much focus has been put on notions of variational quantum machine learning where parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) are used as learning models. These PQC models have a rich structure which suggests that they might be amenable to efficient dequantization via random Fourier features (RFF). In this work, we establish necessary and sufficient conditions under which RFF does indeed provide an efficient dequantization of variational quantum machine learning for regression. We build on these insights to make concrete suggestions for PQC architecture design, and to identify structures which are necessary for a regression problem to admit a potential quantum advantage via PQC based optimization.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
The Fourier Wall: Why Public Tabular Datasets Refuse Quantum Advantage, and a Certified Recipe for Where It Lives
Quantum models beat tuned classical baselines on tabular data only when the target spectrum is off-grid, high-order, high-frequency, near-independent, and dense; SPECTRA certifies these conditions and refuses most pub...
-
Out of Tune: Demystifying Noise-Effects on Quantum Fourier Models
Noise, especially decoherent gate errors, systematically reduces Fourier coefficient magnitudes, expressibility, and entangling capability of quantum Fourier models, with circuit architecture and encoding modulating t...
-
Quantum Neural Networks for Cloud Cover Parameterizations in Climate Models
Quantum neural networks predict cloud cover as accurately as similarly sized classical neural networks on coarse-grained storm-resolving climate data, while both outperform a fitted Xu-Randall baseline.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.