REVIEW 2 cited by
$B^0$ and $B^0_s$ decays into $J/\psi$ $f_0(980)$ and $J/\psi$ $f_0(500)$ and the nature of the scalar resonances
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We describe the $B^0$ and $B^0_s$ decays into $J/\psi$ $f_0(500)$ and $J/\psi$ $f_0(980)$ by taking into account the dominant process for the weak decay of $B^0$ and $B^0_s$ into $J/\psi$ and a $q \bar q$ component. After hadronization of this $q \bar q$ component into pairs of pseudoscalar mesons we obtain certain weights for the meson-meson components and allow them to interact among themselves. The final state interaction of the meson-meson components, described in terms of chiral unitary theory, gives rise to the $f_0(980)$ and $f_0(500)$ resonances and we can obtain the $\pi^+ \pi^- $ invariant mass distributions after the decay of the resonances, which allows us to compare directly to the experiments. We obtain ratios of $J/\psi$ $f_0(980)$ and $J/\psi$ $f_0(500)$ for each of the $B$ decays in quantitative agreement with experiment, with the $f_0(980)$ clearly dominant in the $B^0_s$ decay and the $f_0(500)$ in the $B^0$ decay.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Scalar resonance contributions in the $D_{s1}(2460)^{+} \rightarrow D_{s}^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ reaction
In D_s1(2460)+ -> D_s+ pi+ pi-, a chiral unitary coupled-channel model reproduces the LHCb mass distributions and generates T_cbar-s and f0(500) as hadronic molecules.
-
Roles of $f_{0}(500)$ and $f_{0}(980)$ in the $D_{(s)}^{+}\rightarrow\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ decays
A quark-level hadronization plus meson rescattering model reproduces why D_s -> pi+ pi+ pi- contains only the f0(980) resonance while D+ -> pi+ pi+ pi- contains both f0(500) and f0(980).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.