Learning-Driven Channel Representation for Wireless Localization: From Channel Observations to Location Inference

Chenglong Li; Emmeric Tanghe; Hongyu Xie; Shaojie Ni; Wout Joseph; Xiaojun Yuan; Xinming Huang

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 239 references

Learning-Driven Channel Representation for Wireless Localization: From Channel Observations to Location Inference

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey argues that channel representation quality, not the inference network, is the decisive factor for wireless localization accuracy and generalization.

desk verdict A useful and broad survey whose organizing thesis—representations are decisive—is asserted rather than demonstrated, but the paper itself knows this, and the taxonomy is worth engaging. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14938 v1 pith:A6M4YOMA submitted 2026-07-16 eess.SP

Hongyu Xie , Chenglong Li , Xinming Huang , Emmeric Tanghe , Wout Joseph , Shaojie Ni , Xiaojun Yuan This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.SP

keywords wirelesslocalizationchannelrepresentationstateinformationlearningdomaingeneralizationself-supervisedchartingknowledgemap

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reorganizes learning-driven wireless localization around a single move: instead of treating localization as an end-to-end map from channel data to coordinates, it splits the process into wireless observation, channel representation, and location inference. Its central claim is that localization accuracy and generalization hinge on the quality of the representation—whether the model extracts and preserves location-related propagation information while suppressing environment-, device-, and system-specific perturbations—and only secondarily on the inference network. A sympathetic reader would care because this shifts where research effort should go: toward representation learning objectives, spatial structure (channel charts, channel knowledge maps), invariance across domains, and self-supervised reuse, rather than only deeper regressors. The paper organizes the field along these axes and compares methods on accuracy, data requirements, applicability, and generalization.

What carries the argument

The central object is the channel representation z = F(x), the learned or extracted features that stand between raw wireless observations (RSS, CIR, CSI, I/Q) and location inference G(z). In the paper's framework, z carries all location-relevant information into the estimator; the claim is that its sufficiency and stability, not the complexity of G, determine localization accuracy and generalization. The paper uses this decomposition to classify methods by how z is acquired (handcrafted, transform-based, implicit, chart-based, map-based, self-supervised) and how it is organized for inference (classical, spatial-structure, transfer-adapted, invariant, general).

What would settle it

A concrete disconfirming experiment: take a fixed, high-quality representation extractor and compare localization accuracy when the inference head is a trivial linear projection versus a large-capacity network, holding the data constant. If the large head adds little over the linear head, representation quality is the bottleneck as claimed; if the large head yields large gains, the inference module matters more than the paper's framing suggests. Alternatively, if a representation extractor pretrained on randomly shuffled channel data, with only the head trained, achieves accuracy comparable to

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the performance ceiling for learning-driven localization is set by the channel representation, defined as the features extracted or learned from wireless observations that characterize channel propagation structure and location-related information. The authors model localization as z = F(x), then y = G(z), and argue that F(·) dictates representation quality while G(·) only determines its use; a representation that is sufficient and stable under distribution shift makes the inference module more likely to be accurate and generalizable. The survey's organizing claim is that methods should be classified by how representations are acquired and orga

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes that channel observations contain a separable, stable location-related component that learning can extract and separate from environment-, device-, and system-specific perturbations; the paper itself notes there is no absolute boundary between domain-invariant and domain-specific features and that the link between learned methods and propagation mechanisms is not yet understood.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Localization research should focus on representation learning objectives—separating geometry-related information from environment, device, and system perturbations—rather than on deeper inference heads alone.
Methods that encode spatial structure, such as channel charting and channel knowledge maps, can cut labeled-data needs because they recover relative geometry or position-indexed channel knowledge instead of dense fingerprints.
Domain-invariant representations should generalize to unseen environments without target-scenario data, while domain adaptation methods require target data but can align distributions when available.
Self-supervised pretraining on unlabeled channel observations should enable few-shot localization and cross-task reuse across ranging, angle estimation, beam management, and fingerprinting.
Evaluation of localization systems should report representation-space metrics, data collection and adaptation costs, and deployment overhead alongside final localization error, since error alone conflates representation quality with inference-head complexity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct test of the central claim: freeze a pretrained representation extractor and retrain only the inference head across several environments; if accuracy degrades sharply when the representation is not adapted, that supports the claim, whereas if a simple head recovers accuracy, the bottleneck is elsewhere.
The framework suggests a representation-bottleneck decomposition of localization error, in which error comes from information lost in F plus suboptimality in G; mutual-information or Cramer-Rao-style bounds could quantify how much head complexity can compensate for a weak representation.
The paper's caveat that generic augmentation and masked reconstruction may disturb delay and multipath structure implies a testable design rule: pretext tasks that respect propagation physics, such as delay-angle-consistent reconstruction, should outperform domain-agnostic masking for localization downstream tasks.
If the claim generalizes, representation-quality metrics could serve as a selection criterion for architectures and pretraining schemes before any labeled localization data is used, because final error conflates representation and head.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper is a genuinely useful survey. The observation→representation→inference framing is a reasonable way to organize a scattered literature, and grouping methods by how they acquire and organize representations rather than by scenario or algorithm is actually helpful. The coverage of channel charting, CKM, and self-supervised learning in one place is timely, and the challenges section is honest and well-informed.

The central claim—that representation quality plays a decisive role in localization performance—is not supported by evidence in the paper. There is no independent metric for representation quality, and the paper itself concedes in V-E2 that final task metrics cannot separate representation effects from inference head, data density, or augmentation. That makes the "decisive" claim closer to a research hypothesis than a demonstrated result. It should be framed that way, and the paper would be stronger for it. Similarly, the premise that a separable, stable location-related component exists in channel observations is conceded in V-C2 to lack a clear decision criterion. That is an honest admission, but it also means the framework's foundational assumption remains unproven.

The "first to foreground" novelty claim is not backed by a systematic search, and the star tables in Tables I and II would benefit from a documented rubric. These are fixable in revision. For a survey, the paper does what a good survey should: it organizes, compares, and identifies gaps without pretending to have experimental results it doesn't possess.

The audience is clear: graduate students and researchers entering wireless localization, plus ISAC researchers wanting a conceptual map. I would take it seriously as a reference, provided the authors temper the decisive-role language and present the framework as an organizing perspective rather than a proven law.

Recommendation: send it to peer review. It's a coherent, serious survey that will be useful after moderate revision.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This survey proposes that learning-driven wireless localization should be understood through a unified 'wireless observation–channel representation–location inference' framework. It reviews channel observation modalities (RSS, CIR, CSI, I/Q, reference signals), feature extraction and representation-learning methods (handcrafted, transform-based, implicit, channel charting, CKM, self-supervised), and representation-based localization approaches (classical, spatial-structure, transfer-adaptation, invariant-representation, general-representation). The paper's central claim is that the quality and usability of channel representations play a decisive role in localization accuracy and generalization, beyond the inference head or data quantity. Two qualitative comparison tables summarize the reviewed families, and Section V lists challenges for deployment, including data collection, representation interpretability, generalization characterization, standardized evaluation, deployability, and trustworthiness.

Significance. If the central thesis were established, the survey would provide a useful organizing perspective for a fragmented literature and could guide future representation-centric localization research. The paper is broad and up to date, covers relevant recent work (self-supervised learning, foundation models, channel knowledge maps, channel charting), and its challenges section is thoughtful. It contains no mathematical or experimental claims, so there are no derivation errors to correct. However, the survey does not provide a falsifiable, independent measure of representation quality; the star tables in Tables I and II lack a documented rubric; and the framework's separability premise is conceded to be unresolved. The value of the survey is therefore conditional on reframing the 'decisive role' claim as a hypothesis or on operationalizing representation quality.

major comments (3)

[Abstract; §I; §IV-A; §V-E2] The paper's central thesis — that channel representation quality 'plays a decisive role' in localization performance — is not supported by the evidence presented, and the survey itself concedes the missing link. §V-E2 states that existing metrics 'mainly focus on final task outputs' and do not 'directly demonstrate the effectiveness of representation,' and that final-task gains may come from the localization head, denser sampling, augmentation, or dataset split. This makes the thesis unfalsifiable as stated: any observed accuracy difference can be post hoc attributed to representation quality. I therefore cannot treat the central claim as established. Please either (a) reframe it as a research hypothesis or organizing perspective, with the limitations made prominent from the outset, or (b) operationalize a representation-quality metric independent of final localization error and use it t
[Tables I and II; §V-E] The two comparison tables are the only systematic synthesis in the survey, but they assign one/three/five symbols without a documented rubric. The reader cannot tell what 'Representation Capability,' 'Generalization Capability,' 'Labeled Data,' or 'Cost' mean operationally, how the ratings were derived from the cited papers, or whether they are ordinal, ratio, or editorial judgment. The note 'One, three, and five symbols indicate low, medium, and high' is not an evaluation protocol, and the symbols are heterogeneous (stars, triangles, diamonds, check/cross) across rows. This is load-bearing because the survey's comparative claims rest exactly on these ratings. A reproducible rubric — even a coarse one, e.g., based on explicit criteria such as reported accuracy bands, number of training samples, or cross-scenario testing — is needed, along with a source for each rating.
[§IV-D–IV-F; §V-C1–C2] The taxonomy into classical, spatial-structure, transfer-adaptation, invariant-representation, and general-representation localization presumes that channel observations contain a separable, stable location-related component that can be extracted and decoupled from environment-/system-specific factors. The manuscript itself, however, states in §V-C2 that 'no absolute boundary or decision criterion exists between domain-invariant and domain-specific features,' and in §V-C1 that the relationship between learned methods and wireless propagation mechanisms 'remains insufficiently understood.' These statements are listed as challenges, but they qualify the foundation of the proposed framework. I recommend making the status of the separable-component assumption explicit — e.g., as a working hypothesis with concrete falsifiable consequences — and discussing how the surveyed methods could be use

minor comments (3)

[§III-A1] In the paragraph on feature selection, 'used PPC to quantify' appears to be a typo for 'PCC' (Pearson correlation coefficient), which is the term used earlier in the same section.
[Tables I–II] The legends are incomplete regarding the glyphs actually used. Both tables employ stars, triangles, diamonds, and check/cross symbols, but the notes only explain stars and ✓/×. Please document the meaning of each symbol and the mapping between symbol count and qualitative level.
[§IV-A] The role of F(·) and G(·) is restated several times within the same section and again at the start of §IV-B. Condensing these repetitions would improve readability without changing content.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Survey's 'representation quality is decisive' thesis is partly definitional; paper itself concedes no independent representation metric.

self definitional [Section I (Introduction) and Section IV-A (Proposed Framework); limitation acknowledged in Section V-E2]
"We define channel representations as features extracted or learned from wireless observations that characterize channel propagation structure and location-related information. ... localization accuracy and generalization depend not only on the final inference module, but also on whether the model can extract and preserve effective location-related information from wireless observations. ... A high-quality channel representation z should not be viewed as a simple dimensionality reduction or compression of the observation. It needs to preserve key information relevant to position estimation ..."

By construction, 'channel representation' is defined as the carrier of 'location-related information', and a 'high-quality' representation is defined as one that preserves information relevant to position estimation and suppresses task-irrelevant shifts. The conclusion that localization performance 'depends fundamentally' on representation quality then largely restates the definition rather than establishing a distinct empirical result. The paper itself concedes in Sec. V-E2 that existing metrics 'do not directly demonstrate the effectiveness of representation' and that observed gains 'may come from the quality of channel representations, but it may also come from a more complex localization head, denser sampling, more sufficient data augmentation, or a more favorable dataset split.' Witho

full rationale

This is a survey, not a paper that fits parameters or makes quantitative predictions, so the main circularity failure modes (fitted input called prediction, data-derived coefficients renamed as results) are absent. The self-citations present ([36], [52], [78]) are minor supporting references and are not load-bearing for the central thesis. The only notable circularity concern is definitional: the paper defines channel representation and 'high-quality' representation in terms of location-related information, and then asserts that localization depends on representation quality. That assertion is close to a tautology unless representation quality is measured independently of final localization error. The paper openly acknowledges this gap in Sec. V-E2, and also concedes in Sec. V-C2 that 'no absolute boundary or decision criterion exists between domain-invariant and domain-specific features,' which further limits the force of the invariant-representation branch. These concessions show the authors are aware of the limitation, but the central framing remains partly definitional rather than independently derived. The score of 3 reflects this partial self-definitional element, not a claim that the survey's reviewed methods are circular or that the authors conceal the gap.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no free parameters and no new postulated physical entities. Its central claim rests on domain assumptions about the structure of channel information and on the authors' own organizing framework.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Channel observations contain location-related geometric information that learning methods can extract and stabilize.
Foundational premise for the whole survey (Section II-B). Supported by propagation physics, but the magnitude and separability of this information are not quantified.
ad hoc to paper The three-stage decomposition (observation → representation → inference) is a useful and valid approximation of learning-driven localization, and representation quality is a meaningful bottleneck.
Introduced by the authors as the organizing thesis (Sections I and IV-A); not derived from data or existing theory.
domain assumption Physical spatial proximity leads to similar channel observations, so low-dimensional channel charts can preserve spatial structure.
Basis of channel charting methods reviewed in Sections III-D and IV-C1, originally from [127].
domain assumption Location-indexed channel knowledge (CKM) can be treated as a stable environmental prior for localization.
Basis of CKM-based localization (Section IV-C2); the paper notes it may fail under dynamic environments.
domain assumption A separable boundary exists between location-invariant and environment/device-specific components of channel observations.
Needed for invariant-representation localization (Section IV-E); the paper itself says no clear criterion exists (Section V-C2).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Learning-Driven Channel Representation for Wireless Localization: From Channel Observations to Location Inference." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A6M4YOMA

@misc{pith2026260714938,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Learning-Driven Channel Representation for Wireless Localization: From Channel Observations to Location Inference},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A6M4YOMA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14938}
}

read the original abstract

Wireless observations capture radio signal responses formed through interactions with propagation environments and spatial geometry. In integrated sensing and communication, such observations have become an important basis for high-accuracy localization beyond conventional channel estimation. Learning-driven methods learn implicit relations between channel propagation and spatial position, enabling location inference under complex channel conditions. However, the useful information is tightly coupled with environmental layout, temporal dynamics, hardware differences, and system configurations. This coupling obscures the inference process and weakens performance consistency across scenarios. In this paper, we model the localization process as a unified ``wireless observation--channel representation--location inference'' framework, and review learning-driven high-accuracy localization techniques with channel representations as the organizing view. The survey covers typical channel observation forms and analyzes their physical meanings. We also review channel feature extraction and representation learning methods, and summarize methods according to the acquisition, organization, adaptation, and reuse of channel representations. Typical methods are compared in terms of accuracy, applicable conditions, data requirements, and generalization. We highlight that the quality and usability of channel representations are critical to exploiting propagation information, and thus play a decisive role in localization performance. Finally, we summarize the key challenges in moving from experimental studies to real deployment and present our perspectives on these issues.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14938 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Typical channel observations for channel representation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Channel representation-based localization framework and typical rep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Representative realizations of localization with classical channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Spatial organization of channel representations through channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Adaptation of channel representations from source domains to target [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Learning domain-invariant channel representations by separating stable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Reusable channel representations learned from unlabeled observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

239 extracted references · 12 linked inside Pith

[1]

Positioning and sensing in 6g: Gaps, challenges, and opportuni- ties,

A. Behravan, V . Yajnanarayana, M. F. Keskin, H. Chen, D. Shrestha, T. E. Abrudan, T. Svensson, K. Schindhelm, A. Wolfgang, S. Lindberg et al., “Positioning and sensing in 6g: Gaps, challenges, and opportuni- ties,”IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2022

2022
[2]

Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,

ITU-R, “Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,” International Telecommunication Union, Tech. Rep. Recommendation ITU-R M.2160-0, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-M.2160-0-202311-I/en
[3]

Service requirements for the 5G system,

3GPP, “Service requirements for the 5G system,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project, Tech. Rep. TS 22.261, Version 20.6.0, Release 20, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/ Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3107

2026
[4]

Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6g and beyond,

F. Liu, Y . Cui, C. Masouros, J. Xu, T. X. Han, Y . C. Eldar, and S. Buzzi, “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6g and beyond,”IEEE journal on selected areas in communications, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022

2022
[5]

Integrating sensing and communi- cations for ubiquitous iot: Applications, trends, and challenges,

Y . Cui, F. Liu, X. Jing, and J. Mu, “Integrating sensing and communi- cations for ubiquitous iot: Applications, trends, and challenges,”IEEE network, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 158–167, 2021

2021
[6]

Service requirements for integrated sensing and communication; stage 1,

3GPP, “Service requirements for integrated sensing and communication; stage 1,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project, Tech. Rep. TS 22.137, Version 19.1.0, Release 19,
[7]

A tutorial on mimo-ofdm isac: From far-field to near-field,

Q. Dai, Y . Zeng, H. Wang, C. You, C. Zhou, H. Cheng, X. Xu, S. Jin, A. L. Swindlehurst, Y . C. Eldaret al., “A tutorial on mimo-ofdm isac: From far-field to near-field,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 28, pp. 4319–4358, 2026

2026
[8]

High-efficiency device positioning and location-aware communications in dense 5g networks,

M. Koivisto, A. Hakkarainen, M. Costa, P. Kela, K. Leppanen, and M. Valkama, “High-efficiency device positioning and location-aware communications in dense 5g networks,”IEEE Communications Mag- azine, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 188–195, 2017

2017

Show all 239 references

[9]

Csi-based fingerprinting for indoor localization: A deep learning approach,

X. Wang, L. Gao, S. Mao, and S. Pandey, “Csi-based fingerprinting for indoor localization: A deep learning approach,”IEEE transactions on vehicular technology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 763–776, 2016

2016
[10]

Improving indoor localization using convolutional neural networks on computationally restricted devices,

K. Bregar and M. Mohor ˇciˇc, “Improving indoor localization using convolutional neural networks on computationally restricted devices,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 17 429–17 441, 2018

2018
[11]

Deep learning-based indoor localization using received signal strength and channel state informa- tion,

C.-H. Hsieh, J.-Y . Chen, and B.-H. Nien, “Deep learning-based indoor localization using received signal strength and channel state informa- tion,”IEEE access, vol. 7, pp. 33 256–33 267, 2019

2019
[12]

Self-supervised and invariant representations for wireless localization,

A. Salihu, M. Rupp, and S. Schwarz, “Self-supervised and invariant representations for wireless localization,”IEEE Transactions on Wire- less Communications, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 8281–8296, 2024

2024
[13]

Radio foundation models: Pre-training transformers for 5g-based indoor local- ization,

J. Ott, J. Pirkl, M. Stahlke, T. Feigl, and C. Mutschler, “Radio foundation models: Pre-training transformers for 5g-based indoor local- ization,” in2024 14th International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

2024
[14]

A survey of indoor localization systems and technologies,

F. Zafari, A. Gkelias, and K. K. Leung, “A survey of indoor localization systems and technologies,”IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2568–2599, 2019

2019
[15]

On the ground and in the sky: A tutorial on radio localization in ground-air-space networks,

H. Sallouha, S. Saleh, S. De Bast, Z. Cui, S. Pollin, and H. Wymeersch, “On the ground and in the sky: A tutorial on radio localization in ground-air-space networks,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutori- als, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 218–258, 2024

2024
[16]

Cellular, wide-area, and non- terrestrial iot: A survey on 5g advances and the road toward 6g,

M. Vaezi, A. Azari, S. R. Khosravirad, M. Shirvanimoghaddam, M. M. Azari, D. Chasaki, and P. Popovski, “Cellular, wide-area, and non- terrestrial iot: A survey on 5g advances and the road toward 6g,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1117–1174, 2022

2022
[17]

Survey on opportunistic pnt with signals from leo communication satellites,

W. Stock, R. T. Schwarz, C. A. Hofmann, and A. Knopp, “Survey on opportunistic pnt with signals from leo communication satellites,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 77–107, 2024

2024
[18]

A tutorial on 5g positioning,

L. Italiano, B. C. Tedeschini, M. Brambilla, H. Huang, M. Nicoli, and H. Wymeersch, “A tutorial on 5g positioning,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1488–1535, 2024

2024
[19]

Lo- calization as a key enabler of 6g wireless systems: A comprehensive survey and an outlook,

S. E. Trevlakis, A.-A. A. Boulogeorgos, D. Pliatsios, J. Querol, K. Ntontin, P. Sarigiannidis, S. Chatzinotas, and M. Di Renzo, “Lo- calization as a key enabler of 6g wireless systems: A comprehensive survey and an outlook,”IEEE open journal of the Communications Society, vol....

2023
[20]

Modern wlan finger- printing indoor positioning methods and deployment challenges,

A. Khalajmehrabadi, N. Gatsis, and D. Akopian, “Modern wlan finger- printing indoor positioning methods and deployment challenges,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1974–2002, 2017

1974
[21]

In- door intelligent fingerprint-based localization: Principles, approaches and challenges,

X. Zhu, W. Qu, T. Qiu, L. Zhao, M. Atiquzzaman, and D. O. Wu, “In- door intelligent fingerprint-based localization: Principles, approaches and challenges,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2634–2657, 2020

2020
[22]

A systematic survey and comparative analysis of angular-based indoor localization and positioning technolo- gies,

G. K. Fischer, T. Schaechtle, A. Gabbrielli, J. Bordoy, I. H ¨aring, F. H¨oflinger, and S. J. Rupitsch, “A systematic survey and comparative analysis of angular-based indoor localization and positioning technolo- gies,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

2025
[23]

A survey on fusion-based indoor positioning,

X. Guo, N. Ansari, F. Hu, Y . Shao, N. R. Elikplim, and L. Li, “A survey on fusion-based indoor positioning,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 566–594, 2019

2019
[24]

Ubiquitous localization (ubiloc): A 26 survey and taxonomy on device free localization for smart world,

R. C. Shit, S. Sharma, D. Puthal, P. James, B. Pradhan, A. Van Moorsel, A. Y . Zomaya, and R. Ranjan, “Ubiquitous localization (ubiloc): A 26 survey and taxonomy on device free localization for smart world,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3532– 3564, 2019

2019
[25]

A comprehensive survey of machine learning based localization with wireless signals,

D. Burghal, A. T. Ravi, V . Rao, A. A. Alghafis, and A. F. Molisch, “A comprehensive survey of machine learning based localization with wireless signals,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.11171, 2020

2012 arXiv
[26]

Ai-driven wireless positioning: Fundamentals, standards, state-of-the- art, and challenges,

G. Pan, Y . Gao, Y . Gao, W. Yu, Z. Zhong, X. Yang, X. Guo, and S. Xu, “Ai-driven wireless positioning: Fundamentals, standards, state-of-the- art, and challenges,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

2025
[27]

A tutorial on learning-based ra- dio map construction: Data, paradigms, and physics-awarenes,

X. Wang, Y . Pan, and N. Cheng, “A tutorial on learning-based ra- dio map construction: Data, paradigms, and physics-awarenes,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.17499, 2026

2026 arXiv
[28]

Reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces in 6g radio localization: A survey of recent developments, opportunities, and challenges,

A. Umer, I. M ¨u¨ursepp, M. M. Alam, and H. Wymeersch, “Reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces in 6g radio localization: A survey of recent developments, opportunities, and challenges,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 3526–3560, 2025

2025
[29]

A tutorial on environment-aware communi- cations via channel knowledge map for 6g,

Y . Zeng, J. Chen, J. Xu, D. Wu, X. Xu, S. Jin, X. Gao, D. Gesbert, S. Cui, and R. Zhang, “A tutorial on environment-aware communi- cations via channel knowledge map for 6g,”IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1478–1519, 2024

2024
[30]

Channel knowledge map construction: Recent advances and open challenges,

Z. Ren, J. Zhou, J. Xu, L. Qiu, Y . Zeng, H. Hu, J. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “Channel knowledge map construction: Recent advances and open challenges,”IEEE Wireless Communications, 2026

2026
[31]

Multipath assisted positioning with simultaneous localiza- tion and mapping,

C. Gentner, T. Jost, W. Wang, S. Zhang, A. Dammann, and U.-C. Fiebig, “Multipath assisted positioning with simultaneous localiza- tion and mapping,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 6104–6117, 2016

2016
[32]

High- accuracy localization for assisted living: 5g systems will turn multipath channels from foe to friend,

K. Witrisal, P. Meissner, E. Leitinger, Y . Shen, C. Gustafson, F. Tufves- son, K. Haneda, D. Dardari, A. F. Molisch, A. Contiet al., “High- accuracy localization for assisted living: 5g systems will turn multipath channels from foe to friend,”IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, ...

2016
[33]

Robust indoor localization in dynamic environments: A multi-source unsupervised domain adaptation framework,

J. Jiao, X. Wang, C. Han, H. Quan, and J. Zhao, “Robust indoor localization in dynamic environments: A multi-source unsupervised domain adaptation framework,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

2025
[34]

The effect of hardware impairments on the error bounds of localization and maximum likelihood estimation of mm-wave miso-ofdm systems,

D. Tubail, B. Ceniklioglu, A. E. Canbilen, I. Develi, and S. S. Ikki, “The effect of hardware impairments on the error bounds of localization and maximum likelihood estimation of mm-wave miso-ofdm systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 4063– 4...

2022
[35]

Hard sample meta-learning for cir nlos identification in uwb position- ing,

Y . Liu, H. Si, G. O. Boateng, X. Guo, Y . Cao, B. Qian, and N. Ansari, “Hard sample meta-learning for cir nlos identification in uwb position- ing,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 14 136– 14 149, 2025

2025
[36]

Toward fine-grained indoor localization based on massive mimo-ofdm system: Experiment and analysis,

C. Li, S. De Bast, E. Tanghe, S. Pollin, and W. Joseph, “Toward fine-grained indoor localization based on massive mimo-ofdm system: Experiment and analysis,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 5318–5328, 2021

2021
[37]

A transformer- based signal denoising network for aoa estimation in nlos environ- ments,

J. Liu, T. Wang, Y . Li, C. Li, Y . Wang, and Y . Shen, “A transformer- based signal denoising network for aoa estimation in nlos environ- ments,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2336–2339, 2022

2022
[38]

Deep learning based fingerprint positioning for multi-cell massive mimo- ofdm systems,

X. Gong, A. Lu, X. Liu, X. Fu, X. Gao, and X.-G. Xia, “Deep learning based fingerprint positioning for multi-cell massive mimo- ofdm systems,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 3832–3849, 2023

2023
[39]

A survey of various propagation models for mobile communication,

T. K. Sarkar, Z. Ji, K. Kim, A. Medouri, and M. Salazar-Palma, “A survey of various propagation models for mobile communication,” IEEE Antennas and propagation Magazine, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 51–82, 2003

2003
[40]

Propagation mea- surements and models for wireless communications channels,

J. B. Andersen, T. S. Rappaport, and S. Yoshida, “Propagation mea- surements and models for wireless communications channels,”IEEE Communications magazine, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 42–49, 1995

1995
[41]

Wide- band millimeter-wave propagation measurements and channel models for future wireless communication system design,

T. S. Rappaport, G. R. MacCartney, M. K. Samimi, and S. Sun, “Wide- band millimeter-wave propagation measurements and channel models for future wireless communication system design,”IEEE transactions on Communications, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3029–3056, 2015

2015
[42]

From rssi to csi: Indoor localization via channel response,

Z. Yang, Z. Zhou, and Y . Liu, “From rssi to csi: Indoor localization via channel response,”ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 1–32, 2013

2013
[43]

Csi phase fingerprinting for indoor localization with a deep learning approach,

X. Wang, L. Gao, and S. Mao, “Csi phase fingerprinting for indoor localization with a deep learning approach,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1113–1123, 2016

2016
[44]

Ieee 802.15. 4a channel model-final report,

A. F. Molisch, K. Balakrishnan, C.-C. Chong, S. Emami, A. Fort, J. Karedal, J. Kunisch, H. Schantz, U. Schuster, and K. Siwiak, “Ieee 802.15. 4a channel model-final report,”IEEE P802, vol. 15, no. 04, p. 0662, 2004

2004
[45]

Uwb sensor-based indoor los/nlos localization with support vector machine learning,

H. Yang, Y . Wang, C. K. Seow, M. Sun, M. Si, and L. Huang, “Uwb sensor-based indoor los/nlos localization with support vector machine learning,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 2988–3004, 2023

2023
[46]

Robust ultra-wideband range error mitigation with deep learning at the edge,

S. Angarano, V . Mazzia, F. Salvetti, G. Fantin, and M. Chiaberge, “Robust ultra-wideband range error mitigation with deep learning at the edge,”Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 102, p. 104278, 2021

2021
[47]

Evaluation of position-related information in multipath components for indoor positioning,

E. Leitinger, P. Meissner, C. R ¨udisser, G. Dumphart, and K. Witrisal, “Evaluation of position-related information in multipath components for indoor positioning,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in communi- cations, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2313–2328, 2015

2015
[48]

Adaptive leading-edge detection in uwb indoor localization,

M. J. Kuhn, J. Turnmire, M. R. Mahfouz, and A. E. Fathy, “Adaptive leading-edge detection in uwb indoor localization,” in2010 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS). IEEE, 2010, pp. 268–271

2010
[49]

Noise-based threshold ranging method using region-of-interest in uwb signals,

S. Coene, E. Tanghe, D. Plets, J. Romme, L. Martens, and W. Joseph, “Noise-based threshold ranging method using region-of-interest in uwb signals,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 30 605–30 619, 2023

2023
[50]

Transfer learning to adapt 5g ai-based fingerprint localization across environments,

M. Stahlke, T. Feigl, M. H. C. Garc ´ıa, R. A. Stirling-Gallacher, J. Seitz, and C. Mutschler, “Transfer learning to adapt 5g ai-based fingerprint localization across environments,” in2022 IEEE 95th Vehicular Tech- nology Conference:(VTC2022-Spring). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–5

2022
[51]

Ultra wideband (uwb) localization using active cir- based fingerprinting,

J. Fontaine, B. Van Herbruggen, A. Shahid, S. Kram, M. Stahlke, and E. De Poorter, “Ultra wideband (uwb) localization using active cir- based fingerprinting,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1322–1326, 2023

2023
[52]

Soft multipath information-based uwb tracking in cluttered scenarios: Pre- liminaries and validations,

C. Li, Z. Lu, L. Huang, S. Ni, G. Sun, E. Tanghe, and W. Joseph, “Soft multipath information-based uwb tracking in cluttered scenarios: Pre- liminaries and validations,” in2024 IEEE 7th International Conference on Electronic Information and Communication Technology (ICEICT). I...

2024
[53]

Channel state identification in complex indoor environments with st-cnn and transfer learning,

Z. Sun, K. Wang, R. Sun, and Z. Chen, “Channel state identification in complex indoor environments with st-cnn and transfer learning,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 546–550, 2022

2022
[54]

Location-aware range-error correction for improved uwb localization,

S. Coene, C. Li, S. Kram, E. Tanghe, W. Joseph, and D. Plets, “Location-aware range-error correction for improved uwb localization,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 10, p. 3203, 2024

2024
[55]

Review of indoor positioning: Radio wave technology,

T. Kim Geok, K. Zar Aung, M. Sandar Aung, M. Thu Soe, A. Abdaziz, C. Pao Liew, F. Hossain, C. P. Tso, and W. H. Yong, “Review of indoor positioning: Radio wave technology,”Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 279, 2020

2020
[56]

Ubiquitous uwb rang- ing error mitigation with application to infrastructure-free cooperative positioning,

M. M ¨akel¨a, M.-K. Olkkonen, M. Kirkko-Jaakkola, T. Hammarberg, T. Malkam¨aki, J. Rantanen, and S. Kaasalainen, “Ubiquitous uwb rang- ing error mitigation with application to infrastructure-free cooperative positioning,”IEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navi...

2024
[57]

A survey on the main techniques adopted in indoor and outdoor localization,

M. Stefanoni, I. Kov ´acs, P. Sarcevic, and ´A. Odry, “A survey on the main techniques adopted in indoor and outdoor localization,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 2069, 2025
[58]

An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave mimo systems,

R. W. Heath, N. Gonzalez-Prelcic, S. Rangan, W. Roh, and A. M. Say- eed, “An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave mimo systems,”IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 436–453, 2016

2016
[59]

Hi-loc: Hybrid indoor localization via enhanced 5g nr csi,

Y . Ruan, L. Chen, X. Zhou, G. Guo, and R. Chen, “Hi-loc: Hybrid indoor localization via enhanced 5g nr csi,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 71, pp. 1–15, 2022

2022
[60]

Decimeter level indoor localization using wifi channel state information,

R. Yang, X. Yang, J. Wang, M. Zhou, Z. Tian, and L. Li, “Decimeter level indoor localization using wifi channel state information,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 4940–4950, 2021

2021
[61]

Tool release: Gather- ing 802.11 n traces with channel state information,

D. Halperin, W. Hu, A. Sheth, and D. Wetherall, “Tool release: Gather- ing 802.11 n traces with channel state information,”ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 53–53, 2011

2011
[62]

Csi-based indoor localization,

K. Wu, J. Xiao, Y . Yi, D. Chen, X. Luo, and L. M. Ni, “Csi-based indoor localization,”IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1300–1309, 2012

2012
[63]

Deepmimo: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and massive mimo applications,

A. Alkhateeb, “Deepmimo: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and massive mimo applications,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06435, 2019

1902 arXiv
[64]

Spotfi: Decimeter level localization using wifi,

M. Kotaru, K. Joshi, D. Bharadia, and S. Katti, “Spotfi: Decimeter level localization using wifi,” inProceedings of the 2015 ACM conference on special interest group on data communication, 2015, pp. 269–282

2015
[65]

Wireless channel parameter estimation algorithms: Recent advances and future challenges,

R. Feng, Y . Liu, J. Huang, J. Sun, C.-X. Wang, and G. Goussetis, “Wireless channel parameter estimation algorithms: Recent advances and future challenges,”China communications, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 211– 228, 2018. 27

2018
[66]

Fifs: Fine-grained indoor finger- printing system,

J. Xiao, K. Wu, Y . Yi, and L. M. Ni, “Fifs: Fine-grained indoor finger- printing system,” in2012 21st international conference on computer communications and networks (ICCCN). IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–7

2012
[67]

Unsupervised view-selective deep learning for practical indoor localization using csi,

M. Kim, D. Han, and J.-K. K. Rhee, “Unsupervised view-selective deep learning for practical indoor localization using csi,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 24 398–24 408, 2021

2021
[68]

Machine learning for time-of-arrival estimation with 5g signals in indoor posi- tioning,

Z. Liu, L. Chen, X. Zhou, Z. Jiao, G. Guo, and R. Chen, “Machine learning for time-of-arrival estimation with 5g signals in indoor posi- tioning,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 9782– 9795, 2023

2023
[69]

Cross-domain wifi sensing with channel state information: A survey,

C. Chen, G. Zhou, and Y . Lin, “Cross-domain wifi sensing with channel state information: A survey,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1–37, 2023

2023
[70]

Rf-gpt: Teaching ai to see the wireless world,

H. Zou, Y . Tian, B. Wang, L. Bariah, S. Lasaulce, C. Huang, and M. Debbah, “Rf-gpt: Teaching ai to see the wireless world,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.14833, 2026

2026
[71]

Nlos identifi- cation and weighted least-squares localization for uwb systems using multipath channel statistics,

˙I. G ¨uvenc ¸, C.-C. Chong, F. Watanabe, and H. Inamura, “Nlos identifi- cation and weighted least-squares localization for uwb systems using multipath channel statistics,”EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2008, no. 1, p. 271984, 2007

2008
[72]

Nlos identification and mitigation for uwb localization systems,

I. Guvenc, C.-C. Chong, and F. Watanabe, “Nlos identification and mitigation for uwb localization systems,” in2007 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference. IEEE, 2007, pp. 1571– 1576

2007
[73]

Nlos identification and mitigation for localization based on uwb experimental data,

S. Marano, W. M. Gifford, H. Wymeersch, and M. Z. Win, “Nlos identification and mitigation for localization based on uwb experimental data,”IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1026–1035, 2010

2010
[74]

A machine learning approach to ranging error mitigation for uwb localization,

H. Wymeersch, S. Maran `o, W. M. Gifford, and M. Z. Win, “A machine learning approach to ranging error mitigation for uwb localization,” IEEE transactions on communications, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1719–1728, 2012

2012
[75]

Measurement analysis and channel modeling for toa-based ranging in tunnels,

V . Savic, J. Ferrer-Coll, P. ¨Angskog, J. Chilo, P. Stenumgaard, and E. G. Larsson, “Measurement analysis and channel modeling for toa-based ranging in tunnels,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 456–467, 2014

2014
[76]

Ir-uwb-based non-line-of-sight iden- tification in harsh environments: Principles and challenges,

B. Silva and G. P. Hancke, “Ir-uwb-based non-line-of-sight iden- tification in harsh environments: Principles and challenges,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1188–1195, 2016

2016
[77]

Feature selection for real-time nlos identification and mit- igation for body-mounted uwb transceivers,

A. G. Ferreira, D. Fernandes, S. Branco, A. P. Catarino, and J. L. Monteiro, “Feature selection for real-time nlos identification and mit- igation for body-mounted uwb transceivers,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 70, pp. 1–10, 2021

2021
[78]

Sora: Waveform features based soft range information estimation enabling robust track- ing in cluttered environments,

H. Xie, C. Li, Z. Liu, J. Wu, L. Huang, and S. Ni, “Sora: Waveform features based soft range information estimation enabling robust track- ing in cluttered environments,” in2025 10th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP). IEEE, 2025, pp. 702–707

2025
[79]

Problems in modeling uwb channels,

R. A. Scholtz and J.-Y . Lee, “Problems in modeling uwb channels,” in Conference Record of the Thirty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2002., vol. 1. IEEE, 2002, pp. 706–711

2002
[80]

Ranging in a dense multipath environ- ment using an uwb radio link,

J.-Y . Lee and R. A. Scholtz, “Ranging in a dense multipath environ- ment using an uwb radio link,”IEEE journal on selected areas in communications, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1677–1683, 2002

2002
[81]

Threshold-based toa estimation for impulse radio uwb systems,

I. Guvenc and Z. Sahinoglu, “Threshold-based toa estimation for impulse radio uwb systems,” in2005 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband. IEEE, 2005, pp. 420–425

2005
[82]

Ml time-of-arrival esti- mation based on low complexity uwb energy detection,

A. Rabbachin, I. Oppermann, and B. Denis, “Ml time-of-arrival esti- mation based on low complexity uwb energy detection,” in2006 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband. IEEE, 2006, pp. 599– 604

2006
[83]

Threshold selection for uwb toa estima- tion based on kurtosis analysis,

I. Guvenc and Z. Sahinoglu, “Threshold selection for uwb toa estima- tion based on kurtosis analysis,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1025–1027, 2005

2005
[84]

Wifi-based indoor line-of-sight identification,

Z. Zhou, Z. Yang, C. Wu, L. Shangguan, H. Cai, Y . Liu, and L. M. Ni, “Wifi-based indoor line-of-sight identification,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 6125–6136, 2015

2015
[85]

A novel nlos mitigation algorithm for uwb localization in harsh indoor environments,

K. Yu, K. Wen, Y . Li, S. Zhang, and K. Zhang, “A novel nlos mitigation algorithm for uwb localization in harsh indoor environments,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 686–699, 2018

2018
[86]

Radar: An in-building rf-based user location and tracking system,

P. Bahl and V . N. Padmanabhan, “Radar: An in-building rf-based user location and tracking system,” inProceedings IEEE INFOCOM
[87]

Modeling of indoor position- ing systems based on location fingerprinting,

K. Kaemarungsi and P. Krishnamurthy, “Modeling of indoor position- ing systems based on location fingerprinting,” inIeee Infocom 2004, vol. 2. IEEE, 2004, pp. 1012–1022

2004
[88]

Properties of indoor received signal strength for wlan location fingerprinting,

——, “Properties of indoor received signal strength for wlan location fingerprinting,” inThe First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, 2004. MOBIQUI- TOUS 2004.IEEE, 2004, pp. 14–23

2004
[89]

Cellsense: A probabilistic rssi-based gsm positioning system,

M. Ibrahim and M. Youssef, “Cellsense: A probabilistic rssi-based gsm positioning system,” in2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010. IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–5

2010
[90]

Hyperbolic location fingerprinting: A calibration-free solution for handling differences in signal strength,

M. B. Kjærgaard and C. V . Munk, “Hyperbolic location fingerprinting: A calibration-free solution for handling differences in signal strength,” inProceedings of the Sixth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2008). IEEE, 2008, ...

2008
[91]

Ssd: A robust rf location fingerprint addressing mobile devices’ heterogeneity,

A. M. Hossain, Y . Jin, W.-S. Soh, and H. N. Van, “Ssd: A robust rf location fingerprint addressing mobile devices’ heterogeneity,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 65–77, 2011

2011
[92]

Enhanced fingerprinting and trajectory prediction for iot localization in smart buildings,

K. Lin, M. Chen, J. Deng, M. M. Hassan, and G. Fortino, “Enhanced fingerprinting and trajectory prediction for iot localization in smart buildings,”IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1294–1307, 2016

2016
[93]

Robust wifi localization by fusing derivative fingerprints of rss and multiple classifiers,

X. Guo, N. R. Elikplim, N. Ansari, L. Li, and L. Wang, “Robust wifi localization by fusing derivative fingerprints of rss and multiple classifiers,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3177–3186, 2019

2019
[94]

Precise indoor localization using phy layer information,

S. Sen, R. R. Choudhury, B. Radunovic, and T. Minka, “Precise indoor localization using phy layer information,” inProceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on hot topics in networks, 2011, pp. 1–6

2011
[95]

Csi- based device-free wireless localization and activity recognition using radio frequency interference model,

K. Wu, J. Xiao, Y . Yi, M. Gao, L. M. Ni, and Y . Liu, “Csi- based device-free wireless localization and activity recognition using radio frequency interference model,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 2329–2341, 2013

2013
[96]

Csi-mimo: An efficient wi-fi fingerprinting using channel state information with mimo,

Y . Chapre, A. Ignjatovic, A. Seneviratne, and S. Jha, “Csi-mimo: An efficient wi-fi fingerprinting using channel state information with mimo,”Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 23, pp. 89–103, 2015

2015
[97]

Csi-based probabilistic indoor position determination: An entropy solution,

L. Chen, I. Ahriz, and D. Le Ruyet, “Csi-based probabilistic indoor position determination: An entropy solution,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 170 048–170 061, 2019

2019
[98]

Aoa-aware probabilistic indoor location fingerprinting using channel state information,

——, “Aoa-aware probabilistic indoor location fingerprinting using channel state information,”IEEE internet of things journal, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 10 868–10 883, 2020

2020
[99]

Indoor localization with channel impulse response based fingerprint and nonparametric regression,

Y . Jin, W.-S. Soh, and W.-C. Wong, “Indoor localization with channel impulse response based fingerprint and nonparametric regression,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1120–1127, 2010

2010
[100]

Los/nlos channel identification technology based on cnn,

F. Wang, Z. Xu, R. Zhi, J. Chen, and P. Zhang, “Los/nlos channel identification technology based on cnn,” in2019 6th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS). IEEE, 2019, pp. 200–203

2019
[101]

Confi: Convolutional neural networks based indoor wi-fi localization using channel state information,

H. Chen, Y . Zhang, W. Li, X. Tao, and P. Zhang, “Confi: Convolutional neural networks based indoor wi-fi localization using channel state information,”Ieee Access, vol. 5, pp. 18 066–18 074, 2017

2017
[102]

Dyloc: Dynamic local- ization for massive mimo using predictive recurrent neural networks,

F. Hejazi, K. Vuckovic, and N. Rahnavard, “Dyloc: Dynamic local- ization for massive mimo using predictive recurrent neural networks,” inIEEE INFOCOM 2021-IEEE Conference on Computer Communi- cations. IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–9

2021
[103]

On the latent space of mmwave mimo channels for nlos identification in 5g-advanced systems,

B. C. Tedeschini, M. Nicoli, and M. Z. Win, “On the latent space of mmwave mimo channels for nlos identification in 5g-advanced systems,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1655–1669, 2023

2023
[104]

D 2-mloc: Dual-domain mlp-mixer framework for csi-fingerprinting indoor localization,

L. Li, Z. Xing, X. Guo, and H. Zheng, “D 2-mloc: Dual-domain mlp-mixer framework for csi-fingerprinting indoor localization,”IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3276–3291, 2025

2025
[105]

Chan- nel state reconstruction using multilevel discrete wavelet transform for improved fingerprinting-based indoor localization,

S.-H. Fang, W.-H. Chang, Y . Tsao, H.-C. Shih, and C. Wang, “Chan- nel state reconstruction using multilevel discrete wavelet transform for improved fingerprinting-based indoor localization,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 21, pp. 7784–7791, 2016

2016
[106]

Indoor fingerprinting localization based on fine-grained csi using principal component analysis,

J. Wang, X. Wang, J. Peng, J. G. Hwang, and J. G. Park, “Indoor fingerprinting localization based on fine-grained csi using principal component analysis,” in2021 Twelfth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN). IEEE, 2021, pp. 322– 327

2021
[107]

Mffaloc: Csi-based multifeatures fusion adaptive device-free passive indoor fingerprinting 28 localization,

X. Rao, Z. Luo, Y . Luo, Y . Yi, G. Lei, and Y . Cao, “Mffaloc: Csi-based multifeatures fusion adaptive device-free passive indoor fingerprinting 28 localization,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 14 100–14 114, 2023

2023
[108]

Novel robust wi-fi-based device-free passive multitarget indoor localization using multilabel learning and unsupervised domain adaptation,

X. Rao, Y . Du, L. Qin, Y . Luo, and Y . Yi, “Novel robust wi-fi-based device-free passive multitarget indoor localization using multilabel learning and unsupervised domain adaptation,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 8394–8405, 2024

2024
[109]

Los/nlos identification for indoor uwb positioning based on morlet wavelet transform and convolutional neural networks,

Z. Cui, Y . Gao, J. Hu, S. Tian, and J. Cheng, “Los/nlos identification for indoor uwb positioning based on morlet wavelet transform and convolutional neural networks,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 879–882, 2020

2020
[110]

Multi-classification of uwb signal propagation channels based on one-dimensional wavelet packet analysis and cnn,

J. Wang, K. Yu, J. Bu, Y . Lin, and S. Han, “Multi-classification of uwb signal propagation channels based on one-dimensional wavelet packet analysis and cnn,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 8534–8547, 2022

2022
[111]

Imaging time-series to improve classification and imputation,

Z. Wang and T. Oates, “Imaging time-series to improve classification and imputation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00327, 2015

2015 arXiv
[112]

Uwb nlos identification and mitigation based on gramian angular field and parallel deep learning model,

B. Deng, T. Xu, and M. Yan, “Uwb nlos identification and mitigation based on gramian angular field and parallel deep learning model,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 22, pp. 28 513–28 525, 2023

2023
[113]

Exploiting 2-d representations for enhanced indoor localization: A transfer learning approach,

O. Kerdjidj, Y . Himeur, S. Atalla, A. Copiaco, A. Amira, F. Fadli, S. S. Sohail, W. Mansoor, A. Gawanmeh, and S. Miniaoui, “Exploiting 2-d representations for enhanced indoor localization: A transfer learning approach,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 19 745–19 755, 2024

2024
[114]

Device-free indoor localization of csi based on limited penetrable horizontal visibility graph,

Y . Liu and G. Li, “Device-free indoor localization of csi based on limited penetrable horizontal visibility graph,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 71 120–71 132, 2022

2022
[115]

Domain adversarial graph convolutional network based on rssi and crowdsensing for indoor localization,

M. Zhang, Z. Fan, R. Shibasaki, and X. Song, “Domain adversarial graph convolutional network based on rssi and crowdsensing for indoor localization,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 15, pp. 13 662–13 672, 2023

2023
[116]

Graph temporal convolutional network-based wifi indoor localization using fine-grained csi fingerprint,

X. Liu, R. Wu, H. Zhang, Z. Chen, Y . Liu, and T. Qiu, “Graph temporal convolutional network-based wifi indoor localization using fine-grained csi fingerprint,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 9019–9033, 2025

2025
[117]

Intelligent indoor positioning based on artificial neural networks,

W.-L. Chin, C.-C. Hsieh, D. Shiung, and T. Jiang, “Intelligent indoor positioning based on artificial neural networks,”IEEE Network, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 164–170, 2020

2020
[118]

Im- proving csi-based massive mimo indoor positioning using convolutional neural network,

G. Cerar, A. ˇSvigelj, M. Mohor ˇciˇc, C. Fortuna, and T. Javornik, “Im- proving csi-based massive mimo indoor positioning using convolutional neural network,” in2021 joint european conference on networks and communications & 6G summit (EuCNC/6G summit). IEEE, 2021, pp. 276–281

2021
[119]

A learning-based sequence- to-sequence wifi fingerprinting framework for accurate pedestrian in- door localization using unconstrained rssi,

Y . Wang, H. Cheng, and M. Q.-H. Meng, “A learning-based sequence- to-sequence wifi fingerprinting framework for accurate pedestrian in- door localization using unconstrained rssi,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

2025
[120]

Csi-fingerprinting indoor localiza- tion via attention-augmented residual convolutional neural network,

B. Zhang, H. Sifaou, and G. Y . Li, “Csi-fingerprinting indoor localiza- tion via attention-augmented residual convolutional neural network,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 5583–5597, 2023

2023
[121]

An uwb channel im- pulse response de-noising method for nlos/los classification boosting,

C. Jiang, S. Chen, Y . Chen, D. Liu, and Y . Bo, “An uwb channel im- pulse response de-noising method for nlos/los classification boosting,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2513–2517, 2020

2020
[122]

Uwb nlos/los classification using deep learning method,

C. Jiang, J. Shen, S. Chen, Y . Chen, D. Liu, and Y . Bo, “Uwb nlos/los classification using deep learning method,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 2226–2230, 2020

2020
[123]

Robust uwb indoor localization for nlos scenes via learning spatial-temporal features,

B. Yang, J. Li, Z. Shao, and H. Zhang, “Robust uwb indoor localization for nlos scenes via learning spatial-temporal features,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 7990–8000, 2022

2022
[124]

Applications of information channels to physics-informed neural networks for wifi signal propagation simulation at the edge of the industrial internet of things,

E. Olivares, H. Ye, A. Herrero, B. A. Nia, Y . Ren, R. P. Donovan et al., “Applications of information channels to physics-informed neural networks for wifi signal propagation simulation at the edge of the industrial internet of things,”Neurocomputing, vol. 454, pp. 405–416, 2021

2021
[125]

Physics-informed convolutional neural network for indoor localization,

F. Ashqar, R. Khoury, C. Wood, Y .-H. Yeh, A. Seretis, and C. D. Sarris, “Physics-informed convolutional neural network for indoor localization,” in2021 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (APS/URSI). IEEE, 2021, pp. 659–660

2021
[126]

Reducing training data for indoor positioning through physics- informed neural networks,

G. Lombardi, A. Crivello, P. Barsocchi, S. Chessa, and F. Fur- fari, “Reducing training data for indoor positioning through physics- informed neural networks,” in2025 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6

2025
[127]

Channel charting: Locating users within the radio environment using channel state information,

C. Studer, S. Medjkouh, E. Gonultas ¸, T. Goldstein, and O. Tirkkonen, “Channel charting: Locating users within the radio environment using channel state information,”IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 47 682–47 698, 2018

2018
[128]

Improving channel charting with representation-constrained autoencoders,

P. Huang, O. Casta ˜neda, E. G ¨on¨ultas ¸, S. Medjkouh, O. Tirkko- nen, T. Goldstein, and C. Studer, “Improving channel charting with representation-constrained autoencoders,” in2019 IEEE 20th Interna- tional Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Commu- nications...

2019
[129]

Siamese neural networks for wireless positioning and channel chart- ing,

E. Lei, O. Casta ˜neda, O. Tirkkonen, T. Goldstein, and C. Studer, “Siamese neural networks for wireless positioning and channel chart- ing,” in2019 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton). IEEE, 2019, pp. 200–207

2019
[130]

Triplet- based wireless channel charting: Architecture and experiments,

P. Ferrand, A. Decurninge, L. G. Ordonez, and M. Guillaud, “Triplet- based wireless channel charting: Architecture and experiments,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2361– 2373, 2021

2021
[131]

Efficient channel charting via phase-insensitive distance computation,

L. Le Magoarou, “Efficient channel charting via phase-insensitive distance computation,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 2634–2638, 2021

2021
[132]

Indoor localization with robust global channel charting: A time- distance-based approach,

M. Stahlke, G. Yammine, T. Feigl, B. M. Eskofier, and C. Mutschler, “Indoor localization with robust global channel charting: A time- distance-based approach,”IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking, vol. 1, pp. 3–17, 2023

2023
[133]

Angle-delay profile-based and timestamp-aided dissimilarity metrics for channel charting,

P. Stephan, F. Euchner, and S. Ten Brink, “Angle-delay profile-based and timestamp-aided dissimilarity metrics for channel charting,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 5611–5625, 2024

2024
[134]

Tdoa-based self-supervised channel charting with nlos mitigation,

M. Ahadi, O. Esrafilian, F. Kaltenberger, and A. Malik, “Tdoa-based self-supervised channel charting with nlos mitigation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08001, 2025

2025 arXiv
[135]

Learning latent wireless dynamics from channel state information,

C. B. Chaaya, A. M. Girgis, and M. Bennis, “Learning latent wireless dynamics from channel state information,”IEEE Wireless Communi- cations Letters, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 489–493, 2024

2024
[136]

Toward environment-aware 6g communications via channel knowledge map,

Y . Zeng and X. Xu, “Toward environment-aware 6g communications via channel knowledge map,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 84–91, 2021

2021
[137]

Environment-aware and training-free beam alignment for mmwave massive mimo via channel knowledge map,

D. Wu, Y . Zeng, S. Jin, and R. Zhang, “Environment-aware and training-free beam alignment for mmwave massive mimo via channel knowledge map,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Commu- nications Workshops (ICC Workshops). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–7

2021
[138]

Channel knowledge map for environment-aware communications: Em algorithm for map construc- tion,

K. Li, P. Li, Y . Zeng, and J. Xu, “Channel knowledge map for environment-aware communications: Em algorithm for map construc- tion,” in2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Con- ference (WCNC). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1659–1664

2022
[139]

Environment-aware channel estimation via integrating channel knowledge map and dynamic sensing information,

D. Wu, Y . Qiu, Y . Zeng, and F. Wen, “Environment-aware channel estimation via integrating channel knowledge map and dynamic sensing information,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3608–3612, 2024

2024
[140]

Propagation map reconstruction via interpolation assisted matrix completion,

H. Sun and J. Chen, “Propagation map reconstruction via interpolation assisted matrix completion,”IEEE transactions on signal processing, vol. 70, pp. 6154–6169, 2022

2022
[141]

Integrated interpolation and block-term tensor decomposition for spectrum map construction,

——, “Integrated interpolation and block-term tensor decomposition for spectrum map construction,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Pro- cessing, vol. 72, pp. 3896–3911, 2024

2024
[142]

How much data is needed for channel knowledge map construction?

X. Xu and Y . Zeng, “How much data is needed for channel knowledge map construction?”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 13 011–13 021, 2024

2024
[143]

Channel knowledge map construction based on a uav-assisted channel measurement system,

Y . Qiu, X. Chen, K. Mao, X. Ye, H. Li, F. Ali, Y . Huang, and Q. Zhu, “Channel knowledge map construction based on a uav-assisted channel measurement system,”Drones, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 191, 2024

2024
[144]

Diffraction and scattering aware radio map and environment reconstruction using geometry model-assisted deep learning,

W. Chen and J. Chen, “Diffraction and scattering aware radio map and environment reconstruction using geometry model-assisted deep learning,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 19 804–19 819, 2024

2024
[145]

Ckmimagenet: A dataset for ai-based channel knowledge map towards environment-aware commu- nication and sensing,

Z. Wu, D. Wu, S. Fu, Y . Qiu, and Y . Zeng, “Ckmimagenet: A dataset for ai-based channel knowledge map towards environment-aware commu- nication and sensing,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2025

2025
[146]

Ck- mdiff: A generative diffusion model for ckm construction via inverse problems with learned priors,

S. Fu, Y . Zeng, Z. Wu, D. Wu, S. Jin, C.-X. Wang, and X. Gao, “Ck- mdiff: A generative diffusion model for ckm construction via inverse problems with learned priors,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17323, 2025

2025 arXiv
[147]

Channel knowledge map construction via physics-inspired diffusion model without prior observations,

Y . Zhu, X. Liao, Z. Gao, L. Zeng, and Y . Zeng, “Channel knowledge map construction via physics-inspired diffusion model without prior observations,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02757, 2025

2025
[148]

Beamckmdiff: Beam- aware channel knowledge map construction via diffusion transformer,

L. Zhao, Y . Wang, X. Wang, Z. Fei, and Y . Zeng, “Beamckmdiff: Beam- aware channel knowledge map construction via diffusion transformer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10207, 2026

2026
[149]

Channel knowl- edge map construction via guided flow matching,

Z. Huang, Y . Zeng, S. Fu, X. Xu, and H. Du, “Channel knowl- edge map construction via guided flow matching,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.06156, 2026. 29

2026
[150]

Rf-3dgs: Wireless channel modeling with radio radiance field and 3d gaussian splatting,

L. Zhang, H. Sun, S. Berweger, C. Gentile, and R. Q. Hu, “Rf-3dgs: Wireless channel modeling with radio radiance field and 3d gaussian splatting,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 10 419–10 433, 2026

2026
[151]

F 4-CKM: Learning channel knowledge map with radio frequency radiance field rendering,

K. Zhou, G. Zhang, H. Li, Y . Cai, S. Liu, and G. Yu, “F 4-CKM: Learning channel knowledge map with radio frequency radiance field rendering,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03601, 2026

2026
[152]

6d channel knowledge map construction via bidirectional wireless gaussian splatting,

J. Zhou, C. Hu, G. Wu, Z. Ren, H. Hu, J. Zhang, R. Zhang, and J. Xu, “6d channel knowledge map construction via bidirectional wireless gaussian splatting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.26166, 2025

2025
[153]

Revolutionizing wireless networks with self-supervised learning: A pathway to intelligent communications,

Z. Yang, H. Du, D. Niyato, X. Wang, Y . Zhou, L. Feng, F. Zhou, W. Li, and X. Qiu, “Revolutionizing wireless networks with self-supervised learning: A pathway to intelligent communications,”IEEE Wireless Communications, 2025

2025
[154]

Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks,

G. E. Hinton and R. R. Salakhutdinov, “Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks,”science, vol. 313, no. 5786, pp. 504–507, 2006

2006
[155]

Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful represen- tations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion

P. Vincent, H. Larochelle, I. Lajoie, Y . Bengio, P.-A. Manzagol, and L. Bottou, “Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful represen- tations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion.”Journal of machine learning research, vol. 11, no. 12, 2010

2010
[156]

An introduction to deep learning for the physical layer,

T. O’shea and J. Hoydis, “An introduction to deep learning for the physical layer,”IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 563–575, 2017

2017
[157]

Ofdm- autoencoder for end-to-end learning of communications systems,

A. Felix, S. Cammerer, S. D ¨orner, J. Hoydis, and S. Ten Brink, “Ofdm- autoencoder for end-to-end learning of communications systems,” in 2018 IEEE 19th international workshop on signal processing advances in wireless communications (SPAWC). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–5

2018
[158]

Deep learning for massive mimo csi feedback,

C.-K. Wen, W.-T. Shih, and S. Jin, “Deep learning for massive mimo csi feedback,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 748–751, 2018

2018
[159]

Deep learning-based csi feedback approach for time-varying massive mimo channels,

T. Wang, C.-K. Wen, S. Jin, and G. Y . Li, “Deep learning-based csi feedback approach for time-varying massive mimo channels,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 416–419, 2018

2018
[160]

Multi-resolution csi feedback with deep learning in massive mimo system,

Z. Lu, J. Wang, and J. Song, “Multi-resolution csi feedback with deep learning in massive mimo system,” inICC 2020-2020 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

2020
[161]

Distributed deep convolu- tional compression for massive mimo csi feedback,

M. B. Mashhadi, Q. Yang, and D. G ¨und¨uz, “Distributed deep convolu- tional compression for massive mimo csi feedback,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2621–2633, 2020

2020
[162]

A spatially separable attention mechanism for massive mimo csi feedback,

S. Mourya, S. Amuru, and K. K. Kuchi, “A spatially separable attention mechanism for massive mimo csi feedback,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2022

2022
[163]

Transnet: Full attention network for csi feedback in fdd massive mimo system,

Y . Cui, A. Guo, and C. Song, “Transnet: Full attention network for csi feedback in fdd massive mimo system,”IEEE Wireless Communica- tions Letters, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 903–907, 2022

2022
[164]

Deep-learning-based channel estimation for wireless energy transfer,

J.-M. Kang, C.-J. Chun, and I.-M. Kim, “Deep-learning-based channel estimation for wireless energy transfer,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2310–2313, 2018

2018
[165]

Deep learning for joint channel estimation and signal detection in ofdm systems,

X. Yi and C. Zhong, “Deep learning for joint channel estimation and signal detection in ofdm systems,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 2780–2784, 2020

2020
[166]

Wirelessgpt: A generative pre-trained multi-task learning framework for wireless communication,

T. Yang, P. Zhang, M. Zheng, Y . Shi, L. Jing, J. Huang, and N. Li, “Wirelessgpt: A generative pre-trained multi-task learning framework for wireless communication,”IEEE Network, 2025

2025
[167]

Wifo: Wireless foundation model for channel prediction,

B. Liu, S. Gao, X. Liu, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, “Wifo: Wireless foundation model for channel prediction,”Science China Information Sciences, vol. 68, no. 6, p. 162302, 2025

2025
[168]

Deep learning coordinated beamforming for highly-mobile millimeter wave systems,

A. Alkhateeb, S. Alex, P. Varkey, Y . Li, Q. Qu, and D. Tujkovic, “Deep learning coordinated beamforming for highly-mobile millimeter wave systems,”IEEE access, vol. 6, pp. 37 328–37 348, 2018

2018
[169]

A fingerprint method for indoor localization using autoencoder based deep extreme learning machine,

Z. E. Khatab, A. Hajihoseini, and S. A. Ghorashi, “A fingerprint method for indoor localization using autoencoder based deep extreme learning machine,”IEEE sensors letters, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2017

2017
[170]

A scalable deep neural network architecture for multi-building and multi-floor indoor localization based on wi-fi fingerprinting,

K. S. Kim, S. Lee, and K. Huang, “A scalable deep neural network architecture for multi-building and multi-floor indoor localization based on wi-fi fingerprinting,”Big Data Analytics, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 4, 2018

2018
[171]

Estimating toa reliability with variational autoencoders,

M. Stahlke, S. Kram, F. Ott, T. Feigl, and C. Mutschler, “Estimating toa reliability with variational autoencoders,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 5133–5140, 2021

2021
[172]

Multiview variational deep learn- ing with application to practical indoor localization,

M. Kim, D. Han, and J.-K. K. Rhee, “Multiview variational deep learn- ing with application to practical indoor localization,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 12 375–12 383, 2021

2021
[173]

A variational learning approach for concurrent distance estimation and environmental identification,

Y . Li, S. Mazuelas, and Y . Shen, “A variational learning approach for concurrent distance estimation and environmental identification,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 6252– 6266, 2023

2023
[174]

Fido: Ubiquitous fine-grained wifi-based localization for unlabelled users via domain adaptation,

X. Chen, H. Li, C. Zhou, X. Liu, D. Wu, and G. Dudek, “Fido: Ubiquitous fine-grained wifi-based localization for unlabelled users via domain adaptation,” inProceedings of The Web Conference 2020, 2020, pp. 23–33

2020
[175]

Fidora: Robust wifi-based indoor localization via unsupervised domain adaptation,

——, “Fidora: Robust wifi-based indoor localization via unsupervised domain adaptation,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 9872–9888, 2022

2022
[176]

Dgsense: A domain generalization framework for wireless sensing,

R. Zhou, Y . Cheng, S. Li, H. Zhang, and C. Liu, “Dgsense: A domain generalization framework for wireless sensing,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08155, 2025

2025 arXiv
[177]

Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners,

K. He, X. Chen, S. Xie, Y . Li, P. Doll ´ar, and R. Girshick, “Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 16 000–16 009

2022
[178]

Lwm: A pre-trained wire- less foundation model for universal feature extraction,

S. Alikhani, G. Charan, and A. Alkhateeb, “Lwm: A pre-trained wire- less foundation model for universal feature extraction,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning for Communication and Networking (ICMLCN). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6

2025
[179]

Af-dcgan: Amplitude feature deep convolutional gan for fingerprint construction in indoor localization systems,

Q. Li, H. Qu, Z. Liu, N. Zhou, W. Sun, S. Sigg, and J. Li, “Af-dcgan: Amplitude feature deep convolutional gan for fingerprint construction in indoor localization systems,”IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 468–480, 2019

2019
[180]

Gan based data augmentation for indoor localization using labeled and unlabeled data,

W. Njima, M. Chafii, and R. M. Shubair, “Gan based data augmentation for indoor localization using labeled and unlabeled data,” inFourth International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom 2021), 2021

2021
[181]

Transfer learning-based nlos identification for uwb in dynamic obstructed set- tings,

R. E. Nkrow, B. Silva, D. Boshoff, and G. P. Hancke, “Transfer learning-based nlos identification for uwb in dynamic obstructed set- tings,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 4839–4849, 2023

2023
[182]

Learning to locate: Adaptive fingerprint-based localization with few-shot relation learning in dynamic indoor environments,

L. Zhang, S. Wu, T. Zhang, and Q. Zhang, “Learning to locate: Adaptive fingerprint-based localization with few-shot relation learning in dynamic indoor environments,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 5253–5264, 2023

2023
[183]

Gan-loc: Empowering indoor localization for unknown areas via generative fingerprint map,

J. Yoon, Y . You, D. Kang, J. Kim, and H. Lee, “Gan-loc: Empowering indoor localization for unknown areas via generative fingerprint map,” in2024 21st Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–9

2024
[184]

Transfer learning for uwb error correction and (n) los classification in multiple environments,

J. Fontaine, F. Che, A. Shahid, B. Van Herbruggen, Q. Z. Ahmed, W. B. Abbas, and E. De Poorter, “Transfer learning for uwb error correction and (n) los classification in multiple environments,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 4085–4101, 2023

2023
[185]

A multi-task foundation model for wireless channel representation using contrastive and masked autoencoder learning,

B. Guler, G. Geraci, and H. Jafarkhani, “A multi-task foundation model for wireless channel representation using contrastive and masked autoencoder learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09160, 2025

2025
[186]

Large wireless localization model (lwlm): A foundation model for positioning in 6g networks,

G. Pan, K. Huang, H. Chen, S. Zhang, C. H ¨ager, and H. Wymeersch, “Large wireless localization model (lwlm): A foundation model for positioning in 6g networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10134, 2025

2025 arXiv
[187]

Channel estimation based on contrastive feature learning with few labeled samples,

Y . Xu and L. Lian, “Channel estimation based on contrastive feature learning with few labeled samples,” in2023 IEEE 24th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC). IEEE, 2023, pp. 91–95

2023
[188]

A mimo wireless channel foundation model via cir-csi consistency,

J. Jiang, W. Yu, Y . Li, Y . Gao, and S. Xu, “A mimo wireless channel foundation model via cir-csi consistency,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning for Communication and Networking (ICMLCN). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6

2025
[189]

Cellular-based indoor localization with adapted llm and label-aware contrastive learn- ing,

R. Ozeki, H. Yonekura, H. Rizk, and H. Yamaguchi, “Cellular-based indoor localization with adapted llm and label-aware contrastive learn- ing,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP). IEEE, 2025, pp. 138–145

2025
[190]

Addressing the curse of scenario and task generalization in ai-6g: A multi-modal paradigm,

T. Jiao, Z. Xiao, Y . Xu, C. Ye, Y . Huang, Z. Chen, L. Cai, J. Chang, D. He, Y . Guanet al., “Addressing the curse of scenario and task generalization in ai-6g: A multi-modal paradigm,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2025

2025
[191]

Uwb positioning system based on lstm classification with mitigated nlos effects,

D.-H. Kim, A. Farhad, and J.-Y . Pyun, “Uwb positioning system based on lstm classification with mitigated nlos effects,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1822–1835, 2022

2022
[192]

Uwb indoor localization method based on neural network multi-classification for nlos distance correction,

C. Tu, J. Zhang, Z. Quan, and Y . Ding, “Uwb indoor localization method based on neural network multi-classification for nlos distance correction,”Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 379, p. 115904, 2024

2024
[193]

Absolute positioning with unsupervised multipoint channel charting for 5g networks,

J. Pihlajasalo, M. Koivisto, J. Talvitie, S. Ali-L ¨oytty, and M. Valkama, “Absolute positioning with unsupervised multipoint channel charting for 5g networks,” in2020 IEEE 92nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Fall). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–5. 30

2020
[194]

Network- side localization via semi-supervised multi-point channel charting,

J. Deng, O. Tirkkonen, J. Zhang, X. Jiao, and C. Studer, “Network- side localization via semi-supervised multi-point channel charting,” in 2021 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1654–1660

2021
[195]

Channel charting in real-world coordinates,

S. Taner, V . Palhares, and C. Studer, “Channel charting in real-world coordinates,” inGLOBECOM 2023-2023 IEEE Global Communica- tions Conference. IEEE, 2023, pp. 3940–3946

2023
[196]

Channel charting in real-world coordinates with distributed mimo,

——, “Channel charting in real-world coordinates with distributed mimo,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2025

2025
[197]

Three-dimensional radio localization: A channel charting-based approach,

P. Stephan, F. Euchner, and S. Ten Brink, “Three-dimensional radio localization: A channel charting-based approach,” in2025 59th Asilo- mar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. IEEE, 2025, pp. 880–885

2025
[198]

Passive channel charting: Locating passive targets using a uwb mesh,

R. Poeggel, M. Stahlke, J. Pirkl, J. Ott, G. Yammine, T. Feigl, and C. Mutschler, “Passive channel charting: Locating passive targets using a uwb mesh,” in2025 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6

2025
[199]

Proto- typing and experimental results for environment-aware millimeter wave beam alignment via channel knowledge map,

Z. Dai, D. Wu, Z. Dong, K. Li, D. Ding, S. Wang, and Y . Zeng, “Proto- typing and experimental results for environment-aware millimeter wave beam alignment via channel knowledge map,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 16 805–16 816, 2024

2024
[200]

Channel knowledge map-enabled nlos isac localization,

C. Hong, D. Wu, L. Wu, Z. Zhang, and Y . Zeng, “Channel knowledge map-enabled nlos isac localization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.06646, 2026

2026 arXiv
[201]

You may use the same channel knowledge map for environment-aware nlos sensing and communication,

D. Wu, Z. Dai, and Y . Zeng, “You may use the same channel knowledge map for environment-aware nlos sensing and communication,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 14 627–14 641, 2026

2026
[202]

Environment-aware wireless localization enabled by channel knowledge map,

Y . Long, Y . Zeng, X. Xu, and Y . Huang, “Environment-aware wireless localization enabled by channel knowledge map,” inGLOBECOM 2022-2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, 2022, pp. 5354–5359

2022
[203]

Localization performance analysis based on channel knowledge map,

H. Wei, Q. Gao, W. Zhang, J. Xia, Z. Zheng, and X. Bao, “Localization performance analysis based on channel knowledge map,”Physical Communication, vol. 72, p. 102721, 2025

2025
[204]

Transfer learning for convolutional indoor positioning systems,

R. Klus, L. Klus, J. Talvitie, J. Pihlajasalo, J. Torres-Sospedra, and M. Valkama, “Transfer learning for convolutional indoor positioning systems,” in2021 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8

2021
[205]

Deep transfer learning for wifi localization,

P. Li, H. Cui, A. Khan, U. Raza, R. Piechocki, A. Doufexi, and T. Farnham, “Deep transfer learning for wifi localization,” in2021 IEEE radar conference (RadarConf21). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–5

2021
[206]

Toward low-overhead fingerprint-based indoor localization via transfer learning: Design, implementation, and evaluation,

K. Liu, H. Zhang, J. K.-Y . Ng, Y . Xia, L. Feng, V . C. Lee, and S. H. Son, “Toward low-overhead fingerprint-based indoor localization via transfer learning: Design, implementation, and evaluation,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 898–908, 2017

2017
[207]

A low-overhead indoor positioning system using csi fingerprint based on transfer learning,

Y . Zhang, C. Wu, and Y . Chen, “A low-overhead indoor positioning system using csi fingerprint based on transfer learning,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 16, pp. 18 156–18 165, 2021

2021
[208]

Transloc: A het- erogeneous knowledge transfer framework for fingerprint-based indoor localization,

L. Li, X. Guo, M. Zhao, H. Li, and N. Ansari, “Transloc: A het- erogeneous knowledge transfer framework for fingerprint-based indoor localization,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 3628–3642, 2021

2021
[209]

Fedpos: A federated transfer learning framework for csi-based wi-fi indoor positioning,

J. Guo, I. W.-H. Ho, Y . Hou, and Z. Li, “Fedpos: A federated transfer learning framework for csi-based wi-fi indoor positioning,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 4579–4590, 2023

2023
[210]

Multi-agent interactive localization: A positive transfer learning perspective,

H. Si, X. Guo, and N. Ansari, “Multi-agent interactive localization: A positive transfer learning perspective,”IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 553–566, 2023

2023
[211]

Metaloc: Learning to learn indoor rss fingerprinting localization over multiple scenarios,

J. Gao, C. Zhang, Q. Kong, F. Yin, L. Xu, and K. Niu, “Metaloc: Learning to learn indoor rss fingerprinting localization over multiple scenarios,” inICC 2022-IEEE International Conference on Communi- cations. IEEE, 2022, pp. 3232–3237

2022
[212]

Metaloc: Learning to learn wireless localization,

J. Gao, D. Wu, F. Yin, Q. Kong, L. Xu, and S. Cui, “Metaloc: Learning to learn wireless localization,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 3831–3847, 2023

2023
[213]

A meta-learning based generalizable indoor localization model using channel state information,

A. Owfi, C. Lin, L. Guo, F. Afghah, J. Ashdown, and K. Turck, “A meta-learning based generalizable indoor localization model using channel state information,” inGLOBECOM 2023-2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, 2023, pp. 4607–4612

2023
[214]

Few-shot meta- learning for dynamic indoor fingerprinting localization based on csi images,

J. Jiao, X. Wang, C. Han, Y . Huang, and Y . Zhang, “Few-shot meta- learning for dynamic indoor fingerprinting localization based on csi images,” in2025 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE, 2025, pp. 01–06

2025
[215]

Multi-environment based meta-learning with csi fingerprints for radio based positioning,

A. Foliadis, M. H. C. Garcia, R. A. Stirling-Gallacher, and R. S. Thom¨a, “Multi-environment based meta-learning with csi fingerprints for radio based positioning,” in2023 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6

2023
[216]

Transfer learning for csi-based positioning with multi- environment meta-learning,

——, “Transfer learning for csi-based positioning with multi- environment meta-learning,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Commu- nications, 2025

2025
[217]

Femloc: Federated meta- learning for adaptive wireless indoor localization tasks in iot networks,

Y . Etiabi, W. Njima, and E. M. Amhoud, “Femloc: Federated meta- learning for adaptive wireless indoor localization tasks in iot networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 22, pp. 36 991–37 007, 2024

2024
[218]

Metagraphloc: A graph-based meta-learning scheme for indoor localization via sensor fusion,

Y . Etiabi, E. Eldeeb, M. Shehab, W. Njima, H. Alves, M.-S. Alouini, and E. M. Amhoud, “Metagraphloc: A graph-based meta-learning scheme for indoor localization via sensor fusion,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17781, 2024

2024 arXiv
[219]

A generalization method for indoor localization via domain-invariant feature learning,

M. Xue, Z. Xu, J. Zhang, H. Wang, and Y . Shen, “A generalization method for indoor localization via domain-invariant feature learning,” IEEE Communications Letters, 2025

2025
[220]

Enhancing cross-scenario generalization in indoor local- ization via feature disentanglement,

Z. Xu, M. Xue, X. Xiong, H. Hu, Y . Liu, J. Zhang, H. Wang, and Y . Shen, “Enhancing cross-scenario generalization in indoor local- ization via feature disentanglement,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2026

2026
[221]

Wi-fi fingerprint update for indoor localization via domain adaptation,

Y . Tian, J. Wang, and Z. Zhao, “Wi-fi fingerprint update for indoor localization via domain adaptation,” in2021 IEEE 27th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS). IEEE, 2021, pp. 835–842

2021
[222]

Mascloc: Multi-modal adaptation with signal consistency for localization,

E. H.-C. Lu and Y .-J. Chen, “Mascloc: Multi-modal adaptation with signal consistency for localization,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

2025
[223]

Mdaaloc: An indoor local- ization method based on multi-source domain adversarial adaptation,

X. Shi, X. Xuan, M. Wu, and W.-A. Zhang, “Mdaaloc: An indoor local- ization method based on multi-source domain adversarial adaptation,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2025

2025
[224]

Robloc: Robust wireless localization with dynamic self-adaptive learning,

L. Zhang, S. Wu, T. Zhang, and Q. Zhang, “Robloc: Robust wireless localization with dynamic self-adaptive learning,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 17 866–17 877, 2024

2024
[225]

Domain generalization: A survey,

K. Zhou, Z. Liu, Y . Qiao, T. Xiang, and C. C. Loy, “Domain generalization: A survey,”IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 4396–4415, 2022

2022
[226]

Dan: A domain-level attention network for cross-environment uwb indoor localization,

H. Hu, Z. Xu, and Y . Shen, “Dan: A domain-level attention network for cross-environment uwb indoor localization,” in2025 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

2025
[227]

Towards a wireless physical-layer foundation model: Challenges and strategies,

J. Fontaine, A. Shahid, and E. De Poorter, “Towards a wireless physical-layer foundation model: Challenges and strategies,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–7

2024
[228]

Resilient 3d indoor localization using a masked transformer encoder with multi-band csi fingerprints,

X. Wang, K. Guan, D. He, B. Ai, R. Liu, K. Yu, Z. Zhong, A. Hrovat, Z. Cui, and S. Pollin, “Resilient 3d indoor localization using a masked transformer encoder with multi-band csi fingerprints,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2025

2025
[229]

A foundation model for wireless technology recognition and localiza- tion tasks,

M. Cheraghinia, E. De Poorter, J. Fontaine, M. Debbah, and A. Shahid, “A foundation model for wireless technology recognition and localiza- tion tasks,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 6, pp. 9879–9896, 2025

2025
[230]

A multi-modal foundational model for wireless communication and sensing,

V . Yazdnian and Y . Ghasempour, “A multi-modal foundational model for wireless communication and sensing,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04016, 2026

2026
[231]

The information bottleneck method,

N. Tishby, F. C. Pereira, and W. Bialek, “The information bottleneck method,”arXiv preprint physics/0004057, 2000

2000 arXiv
[232]

Fundamental limits of wideband localiza- tion—part i: A general framework,

Y . Shen and M. Z. Win, “Fundamental limits of wideband localiza- tion—part i: A general framework,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 4956–4980, 2010

2010
[233]

Crlb-based positioning performance of indoor hybrid aoa/rss/tof localization,

C. Li, J. Trogh, D. Plets, E. Tanghe, J. Hoebeke, E. De Poorter, and W. Joseph, “Crlb-based positioning performance of indoor hybrid aoa/rss/tof localization,” in2019 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6

2019
[234]

Performance limits and geometric properties of array localization,

Y . Han, Y . Shen, X.-P. Zhang, M. Z. Win, and H. Meng, “Performance limits and geometric properties of array localization,”IEEE Transac- tions on Information Theory, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 1054–1075, 2016

2016
[235]

Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals,

J. Peters, P. B ¨uhlmann, and N. Meinshausen, “Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodol- ogy, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 947–1012, 2016

2016
[236]

Invariant risk minimization,

M. Arjovsky, L. Bottou, I. Gulrajani, and D. Lopez-Paz, “Invariant risk minimization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02893, 2019

1907 arXiv
[237]

Toward causal representation learning,

B. Sch ¨olkopf, F. Locatello, S. Bauer, N. R. Ke, N. Kalchbrenner, A. Goyal, and Y . Bengio, “Toward causal representation learning,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 612–634, 2021

2021
[2000]

Nineteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (Cat

Conference on computer communications. Nineteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (Cat. No. 00CH37064), vol. 2. Ieee, 2000, pp. 775–784

2000
[2026]

Available: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/ Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=4198

[Online]. Available: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/ Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=4198

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Positioning and sensing in 6g: Gaps, challenges, and opportuni- ties,

A. Behravan, V . Yajnanarayana, M. F. Keskin, H. Chen, D. Shrestha, T. E. Abrudan, T. Svensson, K. Schindhelm, A. Wolfgang, S. Lindberg et al., “Positioning and sensing in 6g: Gaps, challenges, and opportuni- ties,”IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2022

2022

[2] [2]

Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,

ITU-R, “Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,” International Telecommunication Union, Tech. Rep. Recommendation ITU-R M.2160-0, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-M.2160-0-202311-I/en

[3] [3]

Service requirements for the 5G system,

3GPP, “Service requirements for the 5G system,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project, Tech. Rep. TS 22.261, Version 20.6.0, Release 20, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/ Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3107

2026

[4] [4]

Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6g and beyond,

F. Liu, Y . Cui, C. Masouros, J. Xu, T. X. Han, Y . C. Eldar, and S. Buzzi, “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6g and beyond,”IEEE journal on selected areas in communications, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022

2022

[5] [5]

Integrating sensing and communi- cations for ubiquitous iot: Applications, trends, and challenges,

Y . Cui, F. Liu, X. Jing, and J. Mu, “Integrating sensing and communi- cations for ubiquitous iot: Applications, trends, and challenges,”IEEE network, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 158–167, 2021

2021

[6] [6]

Service requirements for integrated sensing and communication; stage 1,

3GPP, “Service requirements for integrated sensing and communication; stage 1,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project, Tech. Rep. TS 22.137, Version 19.1.0, Release 19,

[7] [7]

A tutorial on mimo-ofdm isac: From far-field to near-field,

Q. Dai, Y . Zeng, H. Wang, C. You, C. Zhou, H. Cheng, X. Xu, S. Jin, A. L. Swindlehurst, Y . C. Eldaret al., “A tutorial on mimo-ofdm isac: From far-field to near-field,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 28, pp. 4319–4358, 2026

2026

[8] [8]

High-efficiency device positioning and location-aware communications in dense 5g networks,

M. Koivisto, A. Hakkarainen, M. Costa, P. Kela, K. Leppanen, and M. Valkama, “High-efficiency device positioning and location-aware communications in dense 5g networks,”IEEE Communications Mag- azine, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 188–195, 2017

2017