Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Microwave Engineering of Tunable Spin Interactions with Superconducting Qubits

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports experimentally realized, continuously tunable XYZ, transverse-field Ising, and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya spin Hamiltonians on a superconducting qubit processor using only microwave pulses and its native XY coupling.

desk verdict Useful toolbox paper with a solid XYZ demonstration, but the DM validation rests on a false eigenstate claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16286 v2 pith:ABKBZTEI submitted 2025-05-22 quant-ph

Kui Zhao , Ziting Wang , Yu Liu , Gui - Han Liang , Cai - Ping Fang , Yun - Hao Shi , Lv Zhang , Jia - Chi Zhang
show 19 more authors
Tian - Ming Li Hao Li Yueshan Xu Wei - Guo Ma Hao - Tian Liu Jia - Cheng Song Zhen - Ting Bao Yong - Xi Xiao Bing - Jie Chen Cheng - Lin Deng Zheng - He Liu Yang He Si - Yun Zhou Xiaohui Song Zhongcheng Xiang Dongning Zheng Kaixuan Huang Kai Xu Heng Fan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumsimulationsuperconductingqubitsFloquetengineeringXYZspinmodeltransverse-fieldIsingDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionmicrowavecontroltunablecouplers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a set of experiments on a superconducting qubit processor that aim to show that one fixed hardware interaction can be reshaped into several different spin Hamiltonians by microwave control alone. The native coupling between neighbouring qubits is of XY form, i.e. an exchange of excitations, and the paper's claim is that by interleaving this coupling with single-qubit rotations and virtual phase gates, the same device can emulate (i) XYZ models with continuously adjustable couplings, (ii) transverse-field Ising models, and (iii) Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, an antisymmetric exchange that favours non-collinear spins. The demonstrations use two qubits for the first two families and an eight-qubit ring for the third. If the claim is right, a single analogue-digital simulator gains access to a broader class of spin physics without any change in wiring or coupler hardware.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the first-order Floquet average-Hamiltonian identity $\hat H_{\rm eff}=\frac{1}{T_c}\sum_i\tau_i\hat H_i$, valid in the high-frequency regime $J_{ij}T_c\ll 2\pi$, together with two conjugation rules for the XY interaction. A global $\pi/2$ rotation about the x- or y-axis converts XY into XZ or YZ, and a local longitudinal rotation with phase difference $\Delta\varphi_{ij}$ converts XY into XY plus a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (antisymmetric) term. These rules allow the time allocations $\tau_i$ and phase differences $\Delta\varphi_{ij}$ to become the tunable parameters that set the effective couplings.

What would settle it

Repeat the two-qubit XYZ experiment at a fixed anisotropy ratio while increasing the total period $T_c$ by stretching the resonance intervals, and extract the normalized frequency $(J_x-J_z)/J$ from the y-magnetization oscillations; if the first-order average Hamiltonian is valid, this quantity should stay at the value predicted by $\eta=J_z/J_x$, whereas higher-order Floquet corrections would make it drift systematically with $T_c$. Since the paper reports the zero-order prediction but no sequence timings, this measurement would settle whether the engineered couplings match the claimed values.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a prescription for translating the native XY interaction $\hat H_{ij}^{XY}=\frac{1}{2}J_{ij}(\sigma_i^x\sigma_j^x+\sigma_i^y\sigma_j^y)$ into a programmable set of effective spin Hamiltonians. The prescription is a first-order Floquet average: a periodic sequence of duration $T_c$ is split into intervals $\tau_i$ in which the system evolves under different rotated versions of the XY interaction, and the dynamics are governed by $\hat H_{\rm eff}=\frac{1}{T_c}\sum_i\tau_i\hat H_i$. Global $\pi/2$ rotations transform XY into XZ or YZ interactions, so the two-qubit sequence $\{-X/2,\,X/2,\,Y/2,\,-Y/2\}$ with three resonance intervals produces an XYZ Hamiltonian whose coefficients $J_x,J_y,J_z$ are linear combinations of the time allocations. The transverse-field Ising model is obtained by splitting the XY evolution into two intervals separated by a $\pi$ pulse, which cancels the YY terms while keeping XX, and by implementing the field as a virtual Z rotation. The Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya term is obtained from local phase differences: with a phase $\Delta\varphi_{ij}$ between neighbouring sites, the XY coupling becomes $G(\sigma^x_i\sigma^x_j+\sigma^y_i\sigma^y_j)+D(\sigma^x_i\sigma^y_j-\sigma^y_i\sigma^x_j)$ with $G/D=\cot\Delta\varphi_{ij}$. The eight-qubit ring realizes this for $G/D=0$ and $G/D=1$ and validates the ratio by preparing zero-energy spin-spiral eigenstates and observing their stationarity.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction hinges on the first-order Floquet average $\hat H_{\rm eff}=\frac{1}{T_c}\sum_i\tau_i\hat H_i$ being accurate, which requires the coupling strength times the sequence period to be well below $2\pi$ and the 20-ns microwave pulses to behave as instantaneous rotations; the paper never reports the actual interval lengths or sequence period, so the size of the finite-pulse and higher-order corrections is left unquantified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single processor can interpolate continuously between XXX, XXZ, and fully anisotropic XYZ dynamics on two qubits, with the anisotropy $\eta=J_z/J_x$ set by the ratio of time intervals and the magnetization dynamics reflecting the preserved or broken symmetries.
  • Transverse-field Ising dynamics can be generated with the field strength $B$ controlled by the virtual Z phase, giving a Floquet route to Ising physics that needs no external magnetic field.
  • XY plus Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions with $G/D=\cot\Delta\varphi$ can be synthesized on any ring whose size satisfies the periodic-boundary condition $N\cdot\Delta\varphi=2\pi n$; the realized $G/D=0$ and $G/D=1$ cases are the first two members of this family.
  • Because the required operations are single-qubit gates, virtual Z phases, and the pre-existing XY coupling, the scheme ports to existing tunable-coupler processors without parametric modulation.
  • In the two-spin XYZ block the rotated components commute, so the target dynamics are realized exactly within one control period rather than only in a Trotterized limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same Floquet construction should extend to larger and two-dimensional lattices, but the phase-matching constraint $N\cdot\Delta\varphi=2\pi n$ ties the achievable $G/D$ ratios to the system size, so arbitrary ratios on a fixed lattice would require site-dependent phases or additional interaction blocks.
  • Editorial inference: the paper never quotes $\tau_i$ or $T_c$; a natural quantitative follow-up is a study of how the extracted $J_x,J_y,J_z$ drift as $T_c$ grows, which would map the validity boundary of the first-order Floquet formula for this hardware.
  • Editorial inference: the zero-energy eigenstate stationarity probe used for the DM interaction could be reused as a calibration routine for the relative microwave phase between any pair of qubits, since the decay rate of a deliberately non-eigenstate spiral is sensitive to the realized $G/D$ ratio.
  • Editorial inference: for two qubits the commutativity of XZ, XY, and YZ components makes the XYZ realization exact in the average-Hamiltonian limit; on more than two qubits these components do not commute, so the same sequence would incur a higher-order Floquet error that grows with the number of qubits, a limitation the two-qubit demonstration does not expose.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experimental Floquet engineering of tunable spin interactions on a superconducting transmon processor with tunable couplers. Using a sequence of global pi/2 pulses and resonant XY evolutions, the authors claim to realize (i) XYZ/XXZ spin models with continuously adjustable anisotropy, (ii) transverse-field Ising interactions, and (iii) XY plus Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interactions with tunable G/D ratio. The XYZ section includes a quantitative check: the measured frequency reduction factor 0.65(2) agrees with the predicted 2/3, and the anisotropy dependence of Jx-Jz is shown. The transverse-field Ising data are presented with qualitative agreement to numerical simulations. The DM section validates the engineered G/D ratio by preparing a spin-spiral product state claimed to be a zero-energy eigenstate of Eq. (9) and observing suppressed time evolution of the rotated magnetization.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work provides a useful experimental toolbox for programmable spin-Hamiltonian simulation in superconducting circuits, complementing similar Floquet-engineering demonstrations in Rydberg arrays and trapped ions. The XYZ part is supported by a clean quantitative frequency measurement, and the phase-calibration procedures are carefully described. The DM part, however, is the weakest: the validation relies on an eigenstate-stationarity argument that is mathematically incorrect, and no quantitative fidelity metric or error bar is given. Because the central claim of tunable DM interactions is not convincingly established, the paper in its current form does not fully support its abstract. The results are nevertheless likely repairable by re-analyzing the DM data with a correct validation protocol, which warrants a major revision rather than rejection.

major comments (2)
  1. [DM validation, Fig. 4(d)-(e) and surrounding text] The statement that |ψ0⟩ = V(G/D)|ψx⟩ is a zero-energy eigenstate of Eq. (9) is incorrect. The Hamiltonian in Eq. (9) conserves total S_z, so its zero-energy eigenstates in product form are only the fully polarized states |0...0⟩ and |1...1⟩. The spiral product state |ψ0⟩ has support on all S_z sectors, and in the one-magnon sector the eigenvalues are ±(G^2+D^2)^{1/2} (times the appropriate normalization), not zero. Therefore the observed freezing of ⟨S̃x(t)⟩ does not demonstrate stationarity under the engineered Hamiltonian. For any product state with ⟨σz_i⟩=0, the initial slope d⟨Sx⟩/dt vanishes by symmetry, so the early-time plateau is not a fidelity probe of the G/D ratio. The authors should either remove the eigenstate claim and validate the G/D ratio by comparing the full time evolution with numerical simulations starting from the actual prepared state, using a quantitative fidelity measure, or prepare a genuine eigenstate of Eq. (9). As written, the DM interaction demonstration lacks a valid quantitative validation.
  2. [Eq. (6) and the XYZ/Ising sequences] The effective-Hamiltonian approximation H_eff = (1/Tc) Σ_i τ_i H_i is invoked without reporting the actual time allocations τ_i and total period Tc, nor the 20-ns gate width relative to these intervals. The validity condition J_ij Tc << 2π is stated, but no numerical values are provided. The finite width of the microwave pulses is treated as instantaneous, and no estimate of the resulting correction to the engineered Jx, Jy, Jz is given. Without these numbers, the reader cannot assess whether the quantitative agreement in Fig. 2(c) is consistent with the stated approximation or is partly accidental. Please report the experimental values of τ1, τ2, τ3, Tc, and the gate length, and provide a numerical estimate of the leading Floquet corrections (e.g., via exact Floquet simulation including finite-width pulses) for the parameters used.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Supplementary Material, Eq. (1)] The total period is defined as Tc = 2(τ1+τ2+τ3) in the supplementary material but as Tc = Σ_i τ_i in the main text after Eq. (6). The mapping formulas for Jx, Jy, Jz are consistent once this notational difference is accounted for, but the conflicting definitions will confuse readers and should be harmonized.
  2. [Fig. 3(b) and transverse-field Ising section] The transverse-field Ising demonstration is only qualitative: no extracted B or J_t values, no decay rates, and no quantitative comparison metric are given. The error bars are reported as the standard error over three repetitions, but the agreement with simulation is assessed by eye. A quantitative analysis (e.g., fitted oscillation frequency versus B) would strengthen this part of the claim.
  3. [Simulation parameters in Figs. 2 and 4] The numerical simulations in Figs. 2 and 4 use T1 ~ 10 μs and T2* ~ 1.5 μs, whereas the device table in the supplementary lists T2* values ranging from 0.84 μs to 14.92 μs. The choice of these representative values and whether they were measured at the operating point should be clarified.
  4. [Text near Eq. (10)] The sentence 'As illustrated in Fig. 2(a), we implement local Rz modulation...' refers to the DM experiment, but Fig. 2 concerns the XYZ interaction; this should be Fig. 4(a).
  5. [Summary paragraph] The phrase 'high precision preciseness' is a typo and should be corrected.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor self-consistency in the DM eigenstate probe; overall Hamiltonian-engineering derivation is self-contained.

  1. self definitional [DM interaction section, after Eq. (9), paragraph beginning 'To validate the engineered G/D interaction ratio']
    "To validate the engineered G/D interaction ratio, we prepare the system in the eigenstate |ψ0⟩ = V (G/D)|ψx⟩, where |ψx⟩ represents an x-polarized ferromagnetic state. The unitary transformation V (G/D) = ⨂ L l=1 e^{il(φ/2)σ z l}, with φ = tan−1(G/D)+π, generates a spin spiral texture characterized by wavevector φ ... This zero-energy eigenstate of Eq. (9) serves as a sensitive fidelity probe: its dynamical stationarity directly reflects the accuracy of the engineered Hamiltonian."

    The validation state is constructed with the same G/D ratio it is meant to verify: the spiral wavevector φ is set to tan^{-1}(G/D)+π, which is the zero-energy condition of the target Hamiltonian Eq. (9). Thus the stationarity of |ψ0⟩ is a consistency check between the applied control phase and the assumed G/D mapping, not an independent determination of G/D. If the engineered Hamiltonian differs from Eq. (9), the state will not be its eigenstate, so the observation is not completely empty; but the probe's definition embeds the target relation, making the demonstration partially self-consistent. This is distinct from the XYZ and transverse-field Ising checks, which compare non-trivial dynamics to analytical predictions and numerical simulations.

full rationale

Most of the derivation chain is self-contained. The XYZ and transverse-field Ising Hamiltonians are obtained by explicit unitary conjugation and Floquet averaging (Eqs. 3-6), with coefficients set by calibrated time intervals τi and virtual-Z phases; the observed dynamics are compared with analytical frequency scalings and with numerical simulations using independent T1 and T2* values. The XY+DM Hamiltonian follows from the algebraic identity in Eq. (5), and G/D is set by control phase differences via G/D = cot(Δφ). The one self-referential element is the DM validation state: it is defined through V(G/D) with φ = tan^{-1}(G/D)+π, i.e., using the very ratio the experiment claims to validate. The freezing observation therefore functions as a self-consistency check of the control-to-Hamiltonian mapping rather than a fully external measurement of G/D. This does not make the central engineering claim circular by construction, because the engineered coefficients are control settings rather than fitted parameters, and the dynamics are additionally benchmarked against decoherence-included numerical simulations. The self-citations in the paper are technical or device references and are not load-bearing for the central derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameter is fitted to the observed dynamics. The time allocations and phase differences are explicit control settings, coupling strengths and decoherence times are independently calibrated, and the numerical curves use measured T1 and T2* values. No new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Time allocation ratios tau1:tau2:tau3 = Varied; not all values reported
    User-selected control settings that determine Jx, Jy, Jz in the XYZ model. They are not fitted to the observed dynamics, but their exact values are not reported, which limits reproducibility.
  • Nearest-neighbor phase differences Delta_phi_ij = pi/4 and pi/2
    User-selected virtual-Z phases that set G/D = cot(Delta_phi_ij). They are control settings, not fitted parameters.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The rotating-wave approximation and tunable-coupler Hamiltonian in Eqs. (1)-(2) describe the device.
    Invoked at the start of the main text; standard for transmon circuits but relies on device calibration.
  • domain assumption First-order Floquet averaging, H_eff = (1/Tc) sum_i tau_i H_i, is valid for the implemented pulse sequences.
    Used after Eq. (5) to define engineered couplings; requires J_ij Tc << 2 pi, which is not verified with reported timing.
  • standard math The XZ, XY, and YZ interaction fragments commute in the two-qubit case.
    Stated in the XYZ section, allowing exact one-period realization; can be checked by direct commutators.
  • standard math The product state |psi_0> = V(G/D)|psi_x> is a zero-energy eigenstate of H_XY+DM.
    Used in Fig. 4 to validate the DM Hamiltonian; accepted from refs. 49-50 but not proved in the text.
  • domain assumption Decoherence in numerical simulations is captured by independent T1 and T2* values.
    Simulated curves include T1 around 10 microseconds and T2* around 1.5 microseconds at the working frequency, from Table I.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Microwave Engineering of Tunable Spin Interactions with Superconducting Qubits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ABKBZTEI

@misc{pith2026250516286,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Microwave Engineering of Tunable Spin Interactions with Superconducting Qubits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ABKBZTEI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16286}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum simulation has emerged as a powerful framework for investigating complex many - body phenomena. A key requirement for emulating these dynamics is the realization of fully controllable quantum systems enabling various spin interactions. Yet, quantum simulators remain constrained in the types of attainable interactions. Here we demonstrate experimental realization of multiple microwave - engineered spin interactions in superconducting quantum circuits. By precisely controlling the native XY interaction and microwave drives, we achieve tunable spin Hamiltonians including: (i) XYZ spin models with continuously adjustable parameters, (ii) transverse - field Ising systems, and (iii) Dzyaloshinskii - Moriya interacting systems. Our work expands the toolbox for analogue - digital quantum simulation, enabling exploration of a wide range of exotic quantum spin models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.16286 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Implementation of the XYZ spin interaction. (a) Pulse se [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Experimental results of the XYZ interaction in a two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Experimental realization of the transverse-field Ising inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Implementation of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) spin interaction. (a) Protocol for realizing the tunable XY and DM interactions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author T. I. \ Andersen , author N. Astrakhantsev , author A. H. \ Karamlou , et al. ,\ title title Thermalization and criticality on an analogue–digital quantum simulator , \ 10.1038/s41586-024-08460-3 journal journal Nature \ volume 638 ,\ pages 79 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08460-3

  2. [2]

    Kiczynski , author S

    author author M. Kiczynski , author S. K. \ Gorman , author H. Geng , author M. B. \ Donnelly , author Y. Chung , author Y. He , author J. G. \ Keizer , \ and\ author M. Y. \ Simmons ,\ title title Engineering topological states in atom-based semiconductor quantum dots , \ 10.1038/s41586-022-04706-0 journal journal Nature \ volume 606 ,\ pages 694 ( year ...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04706-0

  3. [3]

    Zhang , author W

    author author X. Zhang , author W. Jiang , author J. Deng , author K. Wang , author J. Chen , author P. Zhang , author W. Ren , author H. Dong , author S. Xu , author Y. Gao , author F. Jin , author X. Zhu , author Q. Guo , author H. Li , author C. Song , author A. V. \ Gorshkov , author T. Iadecola , author F. Liu , author Z.-X. \ Gong , author Z. Wang ,...

  4. [4]

    Georgescu , author S

    author author I. Georgescu , author S. Ashhab , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Quantum simulation , \ 10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 153 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 2014

  5. [5]

    Wang , author F.-M

    author author C. Wang , author F.-M. \ Liu , author M.-C. \ Chen , author H. Chen , author X.-H. \ Zhao , author C. Ying , author Z.-X. \ Shang , author J.-W. \ Wang , author Y.-H. \ Huo , author C.-Z. \ Peng , author X. Zhu , author C.-Y. \ Lu , \ and\ author J.-W. \ Pan ,\ title title Realization of fractional quantum Hall state with interacting photons...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.ado3912

  6. [6]

    author author I. T. \ Rosen , author S. Muschinske , author C. N. \ Barrett , author A. Chatterjee , author M. Hays , author M. A. \ DeMarco , author A. H. \ Karamlou , author D. A. \ Rower , author R. Das , author D. K. \ Kim , author B. M. \ Niedzielski , author M. Schuldt , author K. Serniak , author M. E. \ Schwartz , author J. L. \ Yoder , author J. ...

  7. [7]

    Jotzu , author M

    author author G. Jotzu , author M. Messer , author R. Desbuquois , author M. Lebrat , author T. Uehlinger , author D. Greif , \ and\ author T. Esslinger ,\ title title Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions , \ 10.1038/nature13915 journal journal Nature \ volume 515 ,\ pages 237 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nature13915

  8. [8]

    Monroe , author W

    author author C. Monroe , author W. Campbell , author L.-M. \ Duan , author Z.-X. \ Gong , author A. Gorshkov , author P. Hess , author R. Islam , author K. Kim , author N. Linke , author G. Pagano , author P. Richerme , author C. Senko , \ and\ author N. Yao ,\ title title Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions , \ 10.1103/rev...

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.025001

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Kranzl , author S

    author author F. Kranzl , author S. Birnkammer , author M. K. \ Joshi , author A. Bastianello , author R. Blatt , author M. Knap , \ and\ author C. F. \ Roos ,\ title title Observation of magnon bound states in the long-range, anisotropic heisenberg model , \ 10.1103/physrevx....

    doi

  2. [10]

    Qiao , author Z

    author author M. Qiao , author Z. Cai , author Y. Wang , author B. Du , author N. Jin , author W. Chen , author P. Wang , author C. Luan , author E. Gao , author X. Sun , author H. Tian , author J. Zhang , \ and\ author K. Kim ,\ title title Tunable quantum simulation of spin ...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Gross \ and\ author I

    author author C. Gross \ and\ author I. Bloch ,\ title title Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices , \ 10.1126/science.aal3837 journal journal Science \ volume 357 ,\ pages 995 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Aspuru-Guzik \ and\ author P

    author author A. Aspuru-Guzik \ and\ author P. Walther ,\ title title Photonic quantum simulators , \ 10.1038/nphys2253 journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 285 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  5. [13]

    author author A. A. \ Houck , author H. E. \ T\" u reci , \ and\ author J. Koch ,\ title title On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits , \ 10.1038/nphys2251 journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 292 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author U. L. \ Heras , author A. Mezzacapo , author L. Lamata , author S. Filipp , author A. Wallraff , \ and\ author E. Solano ,\ title title Digital quantum simulation of spin systems in superconducting circuits , \ 10.1103/physrevlett.112.200501 journal journal Phys....

    doi

  7. [15]

    Salath\'e , author M

    author author Y. Salath\'e , author M. Mondal , author M. Oppliger , author J. Heinsoo , author P. Kurpiers , author A. Poto c c nik , author A. Mezzacapo , author U. Las Heras , author L. Lamata , author E. Solano , author S. Filipp , \ and\ author A. Wallraff ,\ title title ...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Fauseweh ,\ title title Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges , \ 10.1038/s41467-024-46402-9 journal journal Nat

    author author B. Fauseweh ,\ title title Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges , \ 10.1038/s41467-024-46402-9 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 2123 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    Sameti \ and\ author M

    author author M. Sameti \ and\ author M. J. \ Hartmann ,\ title title Floquet engineering in superconducting circuits: From arbitrary spin-spin interactions to the Kitaev honeycomb model , \ 10.1103/physreva.99.012333 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 99 ,\ pages 012333 ( ...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Rosenberg , author T

    author author E. Rosenberg , author T. I. \ Andersen , author R. Samajdar , et al. ,\ title title Dynamics of magnetization at infinite temperature in a Heisenberg spin chain , \ 10.1126/science.adi7877 journal journal Science \ volume 384 ,\ pages 48 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author L. B. \ Nguyen , author Y. Kim , author A. Hashim , author N. Goss , author B. Marinelli , author B. Bhandari , author D. Das , author R. K. \ Naik , author J. M. \ Kreikebaum , author A. N. \ Jordan , author D. I. \ Santiago , \ and\ author I. Siddiqi ,\ title t...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Liu , author Y.-R

    author author Y. Liu , author Y.-R. \ Zhang , author Y.-H. \ Shi , author T. Liu , author C. Lu , author Y.-Y. \ Wang , author H. Li , author T.-M. \ Li , author C.-L. \ Deng , author S.-Y. \ Zhou , author T. Liu , author J.-C. \ Zhang , author G.-H. \ Liang , author Z.-Y. \ M...

  13. [21]

    Koch , author T

    author author J. Koch , author T. M. \ Yu , author J. Gambetta , author A. A. \ Houck , author D. I. \ Schuster , author J. Majer , author A. Blais , author M. H. \ Devoret , author S. M. \ Girvin , \ and\ author R. J. \ Schoelkopf ,\ title title Charge-insensitive qubit desig...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Yan , author P

    author author F. Yan , author P. Krantz , author Y. Sung , author M. Kjaergaard , author D. L. \ Campbell , author T. P. \ Orlando , author S. Gustavsson , \ and\ author W. D. \ Oliver ,\ title title Tunable coupling scheme for implementing high-fidelity two-qubit gates , \ 10...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Krantz , author M

    author author P. Krantz , author M. Kjaergaard , author F. Yan , author T. P. \ Orlando , author S. Gustavsson , \ and\ author W. D. \ Oliver ,\ title title A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits , \ 10.1063/1.5089550 journal journal Appl. Phys. Rev. \ volume 6 ,...

    doi

  16. [24]

    \ Liang , author X.-H

    author author G.-H. \ Liang , author X.-H. \ Song , author C.-L. \ Deng , author X.-Y. \ Gu , author Y. Yan , author Z.-Y. \ Mei , author S.-L. \ Zhao , author Y.-Z. \ Bu , author Y.-X. \ Xiao , author Y.-H. \ Yu , author M.-C. \ Wang , author T. Liu , author Y.-H. \ Shi , aut...

  17. [25]

    Dzyaloshinsky ,\ title title A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics , \ 10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3 journal journal J

    author author I. Dzyaloshinsky ,\ title title A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics , \ 10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Solids \ volume 4 ,\ pages 241 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

    1958 doi

  18. [26]

    Moriya ,\ title title Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism , \ 10.1103/physrev.120.91 journal journal Phys

    author author T. Moriya ,\ title title Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism , \ 10.1103/physrev.120.91 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 120 ,\ pages 91 ( year 1960 ) NoStop

    1960 doi

  19. [27]

    author author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen \ and\ author I. L. \ Chuang ,\ title title Nmr techniques for quantum control and computation , \ 10.1103/revmodphys.76.1037 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 76 ,\ pages 1037 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author C. A. \ Ryan , author J. S. \ Hodges , \ and\ author D. G. \ Cory ,\ title title Robust decoupling techniques to extend quantum coherence in diamond , \ 10.1103/physrevlett.105.200402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 200402 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi

  21. [31]

    Nishad , author A

    author author N. Nishad , author A. Keselman , author T. Lahaye , author A. Browaeys , \ and\ author S. Tsesses ,\ title title Quantum simulation of generic spin-exchange models in Floquet -engineered Rydberg -atom arrays , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.053318 journal journal Phys. R...

    doi

  22. [32]

    Kuji , author M

    author author H. Kuji , author M. Kunimi , \ and\ author T. Nikuni ,\ title title Proposal for realizing quantum-spin systems on a two-dimensional square lattice with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction by the Floquet engineering using Rydberg atoms , \ https://arxiv.org/abs/240...

    2024 arXiv

  23. [33]

    author author D. C. \ McKay , author C. J. \ Wood , author S. Sheldon , author J. M. \ Chow , \ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ title title Efficient z -gates for quantum computing , \ 10.1103/physreva.96.022330 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 96 ,\ pages 022330 ( year 2...

    doi

  24. [34]

    Song , author K

    author author C. Song , author K. Xu , author W. Liu , author C.-p. \ Yang , author S.-B. \ Zheng , author H. Deng , author Q. Xie , author K. Huang , author Q. Guo , author L. Zhang , author P. Zhang , author D. Xu , author D. Zheng , author X. Zhu , author H. Wang , author Y...

    doi

  25. [35]

    \ Xiang , author K

    author author Z.-C. \ Xiang , author K. Huang , author Y.-R. \ Zhang , author T. Liu , author Y.-H. \ Shi , author C.-L. \ Deng , author T. Liu , author H. Li , author G.-H. \ Liang , author Z.-Y. \ Mei , author H. Yu , author G. Xue , author Y. Tian , author X. Song , author ...

    doi

  26. [36]

    Huang , author Z.-A

    author author K. Huang , author Z.-A. \ Wang , author C. Song , author K. Xu , author H. Li , author Z. Wang , author Q. Guo , author Z. Song , author Z.-B. \ Liu , author D. Zheng , author H. W. \ Deng , Dong-Ling , author J.-G. \ Tian , \ and\ author H. Fan ,\ title title Qu...

    doi

  27. [37]

    Xu , author Z.-H

    author author K. Xu , author Z.-H. \ Sun , author W. Liu , author Y.-R. \ Zhang , author H. Li , author H. Dong , author W. Ren , author P. Zhang , author F. Nori , author D. Zheng , author H. Fan , \ and\ author H. Wang ,\ title title Probing dynamical phase transitions with ...

    doi

  28. [38]

    Kuepferling , author A

    author author M. Kuepferling , author A. Casiraghi , author G. Soares , author G. Durin , author F. Garcia-Sanchez , author L. Chen , author C. Back , author C. Marrows , author S. Tacchi , \ and\ author G. Carlotti ,\ title title Measuring interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya in...

    doi

  29. [39]

    Roushan , author C

    author author P. Roushan , author C. Neill , author A. Megrant , author Y. Chen , author R. Babbush , author R. Barends , author B. Campbell , author Z. Chen , author B. Chiaro , author A. Dunsworth , author A. Fowler , author E. Jeffrey , author J. Kelly , author E. Lucero , ...

  30. [40]

    \ Wang , author C

    author author D.-W. \ Wang , author C. Song , author W. Feng , author H. Cai , author D. Xu , author H. Deng , author H. Li , author D. Zheng , author X. Zhu , author H. Wang , author S.-Y. \ Zhu , \ and\ author M. O. \ Scully ,\ title title Synthesis of antisymmetric spin exc...

    doi

  31. [41]

    Liu , author W

    author author W. Liu , author W. Feng , author W. Ren , author D.-W. \ Wang , \ and\ author H. Wang ,\ title title Synthesizing three-body interaction of spin chirality with superconducting qubits , \ 10.1063/1.5140884 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 11...

    doi

  32. [42]

    author author Z. T. \ Wang , author P. Zhao , author Z. H. \ Yang , author Y. Tian , author H. F. \ Yu , \ and\ author S. P. \ Zhao ,\ title title Escaping Detrimental Interactions with Microwave - Dressed Transmon Qubits , \ 10.1088/0256-307X/40/7/070304 journal journal Chin....

    doi

  33. [43]

    author author Z. T. \ Wang , author Q. Chen , author Y. Du , author Z. H. \ Yang , author X. Cai , author K. Huang , author J. Zhang , author K. Xu , author J. Du , author Y. Li , author Y. Jiao , author X. Wu , author W. Liu , author X. Lu , author H. Xu , author Y. Jin , aut...

    2024 arXiv

  34. [44]

    author author Z. T. \ Wang , author R. Wang , author P. Zhao , author Z. H. \ Yang , author Y.-H. \ Shi , author K. Huang , author K. Xu , author Y.-S. \ Zhang , author H. Fan , author S. P. \ Zhao , author M.-J. \ Hu , \ and\ author H. Yu ,\ title title Demonstration of maxwe...

    doi

  35. [45]

    Vepsäläinen \ and\ author G

    author author A. Vepsäläinen \ and\ author G. S. \ Paraoanu ,\ title title Simulating spin chains using a superconducting circuit: Gauge invariance, superadiabatic transport, and broken time-reversal symmetry , \ https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.201900121 journal journal Adv. Quan...

    doi

  36. [46]

    Jafari , author M

    author author R. Jafari , author M. Kargarian , author A. Langari , \ and\ author M. Siahatgar ,\ title title Phase diagram and entanglement of the ising model with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.214414 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 78 ,\ pag...

    doi

  37. [47]

    Mehran , author S

    author author E. Mehran , author S. Mahdavifar , \ and\ author R. Jafari ,\ title title Induced effects of the dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction on the thermal entanglement in spin-1/2 heisenberg chains , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.042306 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 89 ,\...

    doi

  38. [48]

    Jafari \ and\ author A

    author author R. Jafari \ and\ author A. Langari ,\ title title Three-qubits ground state and thermal entanglement of anisotropic heisenberg (xxz) and ising models with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction , \ 10.1142/S0219749911007800 journal journal Int. J. Quantum Inf. \ volum...

    doi

  39. [49]

    Garate \ and\ author I

    author author I. Garate \ and\ author I. Affleck ,\ title title Interplay between symmetric exchange anisotropy, uniform dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction, and magnetic fields in the phase diagram of quantum magnets and superconductors , \ 10.1103/physrevb.81.144419 journal jo...

    doi

  40. [50]

    Kargarian , author R

    author author M. Kargarian , author R. Jafari , \ and\ author A. Langari ,\ title title Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and anisotropy effects on the entanglement of the Heisenberg model , \ 10.1103/physreva.79.042319 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 79 ,\ pages 042319 ...

    doi

  41. [51]

    Geier , author N

    author author S. Geier , author N. Thaicharoen , author C. Hainaut , author T. Franz , author A. Salzinger , author A. Tebben , author D. Grimshandl , author G. Zürn , \ and\ author M. Weidemüller ,\ title title Floquet hamiltonian engineering of an isolated many-body spin sys...

    doi

  42. [52]

    urn , author T. Lahaye , author M. Weidem\

    author author P. Scholl , author H. J. \ Williams , author G. Bornet , author F. Wallner , author D. Barredo , author L. Henriet , author A. Signoles , author C. Hainaut , author T. Franz , author S. Geier , author A. Tebben , author A. Salzinger , author G. Z\"urn , author T....

    doi

  43. [53]

    Ying , author Q

    author author C. Ying , author Q. Guo , author S. Li , author M. Gong , author X.-H. \ Deng , author F. Chen , author C. Zha , author Y. Ye , author C. Wang , author Q. Zhu , author S. Wang , author Y. Zhao , author H. Qian , author S. Guo , author Y. Wu , author H. Rong , aut...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.