Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

On the origin of mixed inhomogeneous phase in vortical gluon plasma

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The spatial structure of the mixed phase in rotating gluon plasma is governed by the quadratic magnetovortical coupling, with the linear mechanical coupling subleading.

desk verdict A solid lattice study pinning the mixed phase on the quadratic magnetovortical coupling, but the real-rotation Tc formula rests on an analytic continuation whose quantitative reach is untested. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15085 v2 pith:AGQFX4P2 submitted 2024-11-22 hep-lat hep-phhep-th

V. V. Braguta , M. N. Chernodub , Ya. A. Gershtein , A. A. Roenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lathep-phhep-th
keywords rotatingquark-gluonplasmalatticeSU(3)gluodynamicsmixedinhomogeneousphasemagnetovorticalcouplingTolman-EhrenfestlawanalyticcontinuationlocalcriticaltemperaturePolyakovloop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish why hot gluon matter under rigid rotation forms a mixed phase with deconfinement at the center and confinement at the periphery, and to identify which piece of the action creates that arrangement. The authors decompose the rotating gluon action into a linear coupling of the angular velocity to the gluons' mechanical angular momentum and a quadratic "magnetovortical" coupling to the chromomagnetic field, and their lattice simulations show that the quadratic term mimics the full theory while the linear term alone produces the opposite arrangement. On this basis they argue that the co-rotating metric's anisotropy—not the Tolman-Ehrenfest redshift—controls the radial dependence of the local critical temperature, giving $T_c(r)/T_{c0} = 1 + \kappa_2(\Omega r)^2$ for real rotation. The result matters for the vortical quark-gluon plasma of non-central heavy-ion collisions, where the same inverted phase ordering is expected to appear.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the decomposition of the Euclidean rotating-gluon action $S(\Omega_I) = S_0 + S_1 \Omega_I + S_2 \Omega_I^2$ in cylindrical co-rotating coordinates, and in particular the magnetovortical term $S_2$, which couples the square of the angular velocity to the squared components of the chromomagnetic field. Its work in the argument is to act as a switchable knob: the factors $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ in $S = S_0 + \lambda_1 S_1 \Omega_I + \lambda_2 S_2 \Omega_I^2$ define four regimes (Im1, Im2, Im12, Re2) whose comparison isolates the contribution of each coupling. The companion piece is the local-thermalization approximation, which freezes the $\Omega r$-dependent coefficients of the action at a fixed radius $r_0$ and reduces the rotating system to a homogeneous, anisotropic action with couplings $\beta$ and $\tilde{\beta} = (1 - \Omega^2 r_0^2)\beta$, showing that the metric-induced asymmetry alone shifts the local critical temperature with radius.

What would settle it

Simulate the full rotating SU(3) action at a real angular velocity with a sign-problem-free method (for instance complex Langevin or Lefschetz-thimble sampling) at $\Omega R \approx 0.5$--$0.7$ and measure the radial Polyakov-loop profile: the paper predicts deconfinement at the center and confinement at the rim with $T_c(r)/T_{c0} = 1 + \kappa_2(\Omega r)^2$, whereas the Tolman-Ehrenfest expectation places deconfinement at the rim, so a rim-deconfined profile would settle the question against the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the inhomogeneous mixed phase of rotating SU(3) Yang-Mills plasma is driven by the quadratic magnetovortical term $S_2 = (1/(2g^2))\int d^4x\, r^2[(F^a_{\hat{\varphi} z})^2 + (F^a_{r\hat{\varphi}})^2]$ in the co-rotating action, while the linear mechanical term $S_1$, which couples rotation to gluon angular momentum, is subleading. Switching the two terms on and off through the couplings $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ in $S = S_0 + \lambda_1 S_1 \Omega_I + \lambda_2 S_2 \Omega_I^2$, the simulations show that the full-action regime (Im12) matches the $S_2$-only regime (Im2), whereas the $S_1$-only regime (Im1) produces the opposite phase ordering and a much weaker radial dependence of $T_c(r)$. Analytic continuation $\Omega_I^2 \to -\Omega^2$ turns the fitted local critical temperature into $T_c(r)/T_{c0} = 1 + \kappa_2(\Omega r)^2$ for real rotation, with $\kappa_2$ of order unity, which puts deconfinement at the axis and confinement at the rim. The paper further identifies the physical origin of this behavior in the anisotropy that the curved co-rotating metric induces between chromoelectric and chromomagnetic couplings ($\tilde{\beta} = (1 - \Omega^2 r_0^2)\beta$ in the local-thermalization approximation), an effect that a straightforward Tolman-Ehrenfest treatment misses.

Load-bearing premise

The real-rotation phase structure rests on one unverified step: the formula fitted at an imaginary rotation speed is assumed to stay correct when the speed is made real by flipping the sign of its square, since the full real-speed action has a complex weight that ordinary Monte Carlo cannot handle and was never simulated; if that step fails beyond small speeds, the central deconfinement-at-the-center claim is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For real rotation, the mixed deconfinement/confinement phase exists only above the non-rotating critical temperature, with the phase-boundary radius fixed by $T_{c0} + \Delta T = T_{c0}(1 + \kappa_2(\Omega r)^2)$.
  • Models of rotating quark-gluon plasma that retain only the standard linear $\Omega \cdot J$ coupling will produce the wrong spatial phase ordering; the chromomagnetic sector must be included.
  • The Tolman-Ehrenfest law, applied naively to the rotating gluon plasma, predicts the inverse arrangement and is therefore not the controlling factor for vortical gluon matter.
  • Because the $S_2$-only action is free of the sign problem, real-rotation simulations of the magnetic sector are feasible and support the analytic continuation between imaginary and real angular frequencies within the studied accuracy.
  • The same quadratic magnetovortical coupling underlies the negative moment of inertia below the supervortical temperature, so the phase-structure anomaly and the mechanical-inertia anomaly share one microscopic origin.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $\kappa_2$ is universal as the paper suggests, the same quadratic radial law should appear in QCD with dynamical quarks; because quarks couple to rotation linearly, the gluonic $S_2$ term should still set the shape of the phase boundary.
  • The pole-like rational fit ($b_2 \approx 0.9$ in the local-thermalization approximation) hints at a limiting angular velocity below the causality bound where the deconfining temperature would diverge; a dedicated scan at $u^2$ between 0.5 and 1 could distinguish a physical singularity from a fitting artifact.
  • The local-thermalization approximation, if it holds at higher velocities, offers a computationally cheap way to map the rotating phase diagram: instead of simulating large inhomogeneous lattices, one simulates homogeneous anisotropic actions over a grid of radii.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies SU(3) Yang–Mills theory in a rigidly rotating reference frame on the lattice, using imaginary angular velocity to circumvent the sign problem. It confirms the existence of a mixed inhomogeneous phase, introduces a local (pseudo)critical temperature Tc(r) determined from the Polyakov-loop susceptibility, and parametrizes it by a quartic fit in r/R with coefficients that are linearly fitted in the squared imaginary velocity. The action is decomposed into a linear mechanical coupling S1 and a quadratic magnetovortical coupling S2, and each is simulated separately; the authors find that S2 dominates the formation of the mixed phase, while S1 plays a subleading role. A local-thermalization approximation is introduced, and in the sign-problem-free S2-only (Re2) regime the paper directly simulates real rotation, showing that the polynomial analytic continuation of the imaginary-rotation fit fails for u^2 ≳ 0.2 whereas a rational function works. The main conclusion is that the real-rotation phase structure has deconfinement at the center and confinement at the periphery, in contradiction with a naive Tolman–Ehrenfest expectation.

Significance. The paper's operator decomposition into mechanical and magnetovortical couplings is a conceptually valuable step, and the direct real-rotation simulation of the S2-only theory (Re2 regime) is a clever and important methodological advance because it provides a sign-problem-free window into real rotation. The numerical work is careful: boundary conditions are cross-checked (OBC vs PBC), finite-volume and lattice-spacing effects are analyzed in Appendices C and D, and continuum extrapolations are performed. If the central claim holds, it sharpens our understanding of why the inhomogeneous phase in vortical gluon plasma is inverted relative to the simple Tolman–Ehrenfest picture. However, the quantitative real-rotation prediction rests on an analytic continuation that the paper's own data show is not quantitatively reliable beyond |u^2| ≈ 0.2 in the directly tested sector, so the significance of the specific formula (7.2) is currently partly aspirational.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.2, Eq. (7.2)] The central real-rotation prediction Tc(r)/Tc0 = 1 + κ2(Ωr)^2 in Eq. (7.2) is obtained by substituting Ω_I^2 → −Ω^2 into the imaginary-rotation fit Eq. (4.6). However, the paper's own test of this continuation in the sign-problem-free Re2 sector (Fig. 12) shows that the polynomial continuation (6.2) agrees with real-rotation data only for u^2 ≲ 0.2, while the full data are described by the rational function (6.3). The paper explicitly states that the difference between (6.2) and (6.3) for u^2 > 0 is a systematic uncertainty of the analytic continuation, yet Eq. (7.2) and the phase diagram in Fig. 7 are presented without propagating this uncertainty. Since the full action with the S1 term is never simulated at real Ω, the quantitative validity of Eq. (7.2) for the full theory is not established; the qualitative inverted phase structure is supported by the direct Re2 simulation, but the central quantitative formula should be reframed as an extrapolation whose systematic error is quantified.
  2. [§4.3, Fig. 7] The text claims that because Eq. (4.6) is quadratic in Ω_I, the phase diagram for real frequency at T = Tc0 + ΔT has the same shape as for imaginary frequency at T = Tc0 − ΔT. This is not correct when κ4 ≠ 0: substituting Ω_I^2 → −Ω^2 flips the sign of the κ4 term in Eq. (4.6). For fixed ΩR and x = r/R, the imaginary-rotation function is 1 − κ2(ΩR)^2 x^2 + κ4(ΩR)^2 x^4, while the real-rotation function is 1 + κ2(ΩR)^2 x^2 − κ4(ΩR)^2 x^4. These are different shapes, especially near r/R ≳ 0.8 where κ4 is most important; Fig. 7 should either present the two cases separately or justify explicitly why the sign change of the κ4 term can be neglected.
  3. [§7, Eqs. (7.1)–(7.2)] The summary states that 'The coefficient κ2 in Eqs. (7.1) and (7.2) is given in (4.5)', but Eq. (4.5) is the earlier value κ2 = 0.902(33) obtained in Ref. [41] via a quadratic fit, whereas the new continuum-extrapolated value obtained in this paper from the quartic fit is κ2 = 1.051(29) in Eq. (4.4). Since Eq. (7.2) is the central quantitative prediction, the summary must use the new value and clearly state which fit it is taken from; the current text is internally inconsistent.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§7, Eq. (7.1)] Eq. (7.1) drops the κ4 term and presents 1 − κ2(Ω_I r)^2 as 'well described' by the results, but Section 4.2 states that the quadratic fit is valid only for r/R ≲ 0.5; the summary should specify the restricted radial domain of Eq. (7.1).
  2. [§6.1] The local-thermalization approximation relies on a correlation length ζ, but the text does not specify which correlation length (e.g., the Polyakov-loop correlation length) is meant; please define ζ explicitly.
  3. [Fig. 12 caption] The caption uses the abbreviations 'fit' and 'a.c.' (analytic continuation) without defining them; please spell these out so that the figure is self-contained.
  4. [§4.1] The text says that the transition region 'has a regular circle form'; based on Fig. 1 the boundary appears approximately circular, so the wording should be softened to 'approximately circular' to avoid overstatement.
  5. [References] Reference [38] (Yang and Huang, 'QCD on Rotating Lattice with Staggered Fermions') is cited only by arXiv number without journal or publication status; please update the citation if the paper has been published.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The real-rotation Tc formula (7.2) is a sign-flipped version of the imaginary-rotation fit (4.6), with κ2 taken from the same authors' previous fit; only the sign, not the quantitative continuation, is independently supported by the Re2 real-rotation simulation.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 7, Eq. (7.2); cf. Eqs. (4.6), (4.4), (4.5) and Fig. 12]
    "Formula (7.1) allowed us to carry out analytical continuation from imaginary to real rotation through the substitution Ω_I^2 → −Ω^2: Tc(r)/Tc0 = 1 + κ2(Ωr)^2, [real rotation] ... The coefficient κ2 in Eqs. (7.1) and (7.2) is given in (4.5)."

    Equation (7.2) is obtained by the one-line substitution Ω_I^2 → −Ω^2 applied to the fitted imaginary-rotation formula (4.6), so its numerical content is exactly the coefficients κ2 and κ4 fitted to imaginary-rotation lattice data. The κ2 used in the summary is not a new real-rotation measurement but the value from the authors' earlier paper [41], quoted in (4.5); the present quartic fit (4.4) is also a fit to the same type of data. The paper's own Fig. 12 shows that the polynomial continuation fails for u^2 > 0.2 even in the S2-only local action, and the full-action real-rotation simulation is never performed because of the sign problem.

full rationale

Most of the paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular: the split of the rotating action into S0 + S1Ω_I + S2Ω_I^2 is exact from the metric, and the separate simulations of the Im1, Im2, Im12 and Re2 regimes give a direct, independent test of the central claim that the quadratic magnetovortical coupling S2, rather than the linear mechanical coupling S1, controls the mixed inhomogeneous phase. The local-thermalization approximation is also tested against the full action and against multiple lattice spacings, so the qualitative conclusion (deconfinement at the center for real rotation) has independent numerical support. The circular element is the quantitative real-rotation formula: Eq. (7.2) is not a separate first-principles prediction but an analytic continuation of the fitted imaginary-rotation formula (4.6), with κ2 imported from a self-cited fit. The paper honestly labels this as an analytic continuation and flags the systematic uncertainty between the polynomial (6.2) and rational (6.3) continuations, but the headline summary presents the simple quadratic formula as the real-rotation result. Since the central real-rotation Tc(r) formula reduces by construction to the imaginary-rotation fit, a partial circularity score of 6 is appropriate; the independent S2-operator simulations prevent a higher score.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central quantitative claims (kappa_2, k_2) are extracted from fits to lattice data. The link between these fits and the microscopic S2 operator is tested by switching operators on and off, which is good. The real-rotation prediction for the full action is an analytic continuation of a fitted formula, not a parameter-free derivation.

free parameters (4)
  • C0, C2, C4 = C0 ≈ 0.99, C2 ≈ 0.2, C4 ≈ 0.05 at v_I^2 = 0.16
    Quartic fit (4.1) to the local critical temperature data; C0 and C2 are stable across boundary conditions, while C4 depends on volume and boundary conditions (Appendix C).
  • kappa_0, kappa_2, kappa_4 = kappa_0 = 0.008(6), kappa_2 = 1.051(29), kappa_4 = 0.300(34)
    Slopes of the linear fits (4.2) to the velocity dependence of C0, C2, C4. These are the central quantitative results for the mixed phase and are used in the analytic continuation to real rotation.
  • k_2, k_4 = k_2 = 0.869(31), k_4 = 0.388(53)
    Coefficients of the polynomial (6.2) in the local thermalization approximation, fitted to data in Fig. 13. They describe the on-axis critical temperature as a function of local velocity.
  • c_2, b_2 = c_2 = 0.206(66), b_2 = 0.694(101)
    Coefficients of the rational function (6.3) that fits the Im2/Re2 local data. Used to estimate systematic uncertainty of the analytic continuation, not derived from the action.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Euclidean rotating Yang-Mills action with imaginary angular velocity is the correct lattice framework for studying rotating equilibrium plasma.
    Used throughout Section 3; follows Refs. [32,34] and is the basis of the numerical work. The sign problem prevents direct simulation of real rotation for the full action.
  • domain assumption Analytic continuation from imaginary to real angular velocity is valid for the full action in the studied velocity range.
    Applied in Section 4.3 and Section 6; explicitly tested only for the S2-only action (Re2), not for the full action with both S1 and S2.
  • ad hoc to paper Local thermalization: fixing the action coefficients at r0 reproduces the thermodynamics of the full inhomogeneous system at that radius.
    Proposed and tested in Section 6.1-6.2. Agreement holds for |u^2| <= 0.2, making it a working approximation rather than a derived statement.
  • domain assumption The Polyakov loop susceptibility peak marks the local confinement-deconfinement transition.
    Used in Section 4.2 to define Tc(r). Standard for weakly first-order transitions in SU(3) gauge theory, but the local susceptibility is a pseudocritical estimator, not an exact transition point.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the origin of mixed inhomogeneous phase in vortical gluon plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AGQFX4P2

@misc{pith2026241115085,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the origin of mixed inhomogeneous phase in vortical gluon plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AGQFX4P2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15085}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, lattice simulations of SU(3) Yang-Mills theory revealed that rotating hot gluon matter in thermal equilibrium possesses a novel inhomogeneous phase consisting of the deconfinement phase located in the center region, which is spatially separated from the confinement phase in the periphery. This inhomogeneous two-phase structure is also expected to be produced by vorticity in quark-gluon plasma formed in non-central relativistic heavy-ion collisions. We show that its vortical properties are determined by two types of couplings of the angular velocity to the gluon fields: a linear coupling to the mechanical angular momentum of gluons and a quadratic ``magnetovortical'' coupling to a chromomagnetic component. We demonstrate numerically that the distinctive inhomogeneous structure of the vortical (quark-)gluon plasma is determined by the latter, while the former plays only a subleading role. We argue that the anisotropy of the gluonic action in the curved co-rotating background can quantitatively explain the remarkable property that the spatial structure of this inhomogeneous phase disobeys the picture based on a straightforward implementation of the Tolman-Ehrenfest law. We also support our findings with Monte Carlo simulations of Yang-Mills plasma at the real-valued angular frequency, which take into account only the magnetic part of the action.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Moment of Inertia of an Interacting Bose Gas

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For a weakly interacting phi^4 Bose gas, the moment of inertia density is the perpendicular radius squared times the enthalpy density, holding through order lambda^(3/2) including ring-diagram resummation.

  2. Static Quark-Antiquark Interactions Under Rotation

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In quenched SU(3) lattice gluodynamics, imaginary rotation suppresses bare Polyakov free energies above Tc with a bulk shift well fit by A R_xy^2 + B, while the T≈0 static potential shows no significant rotation dependence.

  3. A Chromomagnetic Mechanism for the Rotational Phase Transition of Gluonic Matter

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using a rotation–magnetic holographic dictionary calibrated to lattice QCD, the paper predicts real rotation raises T_c and induces a negative total moment of inertia in pure gluonic matter near deconfinement.

  4. Thermal Gauge Theory for a Rotating Plasma

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A path-integral framework extends thermal field theory with rotation and chemical potentials to all gauge theories, with generalized KMS conditions and closed-form gauge and ghost propagators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [41]

    Braguta, M.N

    V.V. Braguta, M.N. Chernodub and A.A. Roenko, New mixed inhomogeneous phase in vortical gluon plasma: First-principle results from rotating SU(3) lattice gauge theory , Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138783 [ 2312.13994]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Watts et al., Colloquium : Measuring the neutron star equation of state using x-ray timing, Rev

    A.L. Watts et al., Colloquium : Measuring the neutron star equation of state using x-ray timing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 021001 [ 1602.01081]. – 38 – 0.990 0.995 C0 0.21 0.22 0.23 C2 0.06 0.08 C4 w1-s4-d2 w1-s4-d4 w2-s4-d2 w2-s4-d4 w3-s4-d2 w3-s4-d4 w4-s4-d2 w4-s4-d4 w5-s4-d2 w5-s4-d4 w1-s5-d2 w1-s5-d4 w2-s5-d2 w2-s5-d4 w3-s5-d2 w3-s5-d4 w4-s5-d2 w4-s5-...

    arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    Gamma-ray pulsars: a gold mine

    I.A. Grenier and A.K. Harding, Gamma-ray pulsars: a gold mine , Comptes Rendus Physique 16 (2015) 641 [ 1509.08823]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  4. [3]

    Basar, D.E

    G. Basar, D.E. Kharzeev and H.-U. Yee, Triangle anomaly in Weyl semimetals , Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 035142 [ 1305.6338]

    arXiv 2014

  5. [4]

    Landsteiner, Anomalous transport of Weyl fermions in Weyl semimetals , Phys

    K. Landsteiner, Anomalous transport of Weyl fermions in Weyl semimetals , Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 075124 [ 1306.4932]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [5]

    Arabgol and T

    M. Arabgol and T. Sleator, Observation of the nuclear barnett effect , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 177202

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    Jiang, Z.-W

    Y. Jiang, Z.-W. Lin and J. Liao, Rotating quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 94 (2016) 044910 [ 1602.06580]

    arXiv 2016

  8. [7]

    Baznat, K

    M. Baznat, K. Gudima, A. Sorin and O. Teryaev, Helicity separation in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 061901 [ 1301.7003]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    STAR collaboration, Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid , Nature 548 (2017) 62 [ 1701.06657]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Chernodub and S

    M.N. Chernodub and S. Gongyo, Interacting fermions in rotation: chiral symmetry restoration, moment of inertia and thermodynamics , JHEP 01 (2017) 136 [ 1611.02598]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Jiang and J

    Y. Jiang and J. Liao, Pairing Phase Transitions of Matter under Rotation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 192302 [ 1606.03808]. – 39 –

    2016 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Chernodub and S

    M.N. Chernodub and S. Gongyo, Effects of rotation and boundaries on chiral symmetry breaking of relativistic fermions , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 096006 [ 1702.08266]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [12]

    X. Wang, M. Wei, Z. Li and M. Huang, Quark matter under rotation in the NJL model with vector interaction, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 016018 [ 1808.01931]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [13]

    X. Chen, L. Zhang, D. Li, D. Hou and M. Huang, Gluodynamics and deconfinement phase transition under rotation from holography , JHEP 07 (2021) 132 [ 2010.14478]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Golubtsova and N.S

    A.A. Golubtsova and N.S. Tsegelnik, Probing the holographic model of N=4 SYM rotating quark-gluon plasma , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 106017 [ 2211.11722]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [15]

    S. Chen, K. Fukushima and Y. Shimada, Perturbative Confinement in Thermal Yang-Mills Theories Induced by Imaginary Angular Velocity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 242002 [2207.12665]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Singha, V.E

    P. Singha, V.E. Ambrus and M.N. Chernodub, Inhibition of the splitting of the chiral and deconfinement transition due to rotation in QCD: The phase diagram of the linear sigma model coupled to Polyakov loops , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 094053 [ 2407.07828]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Jiang, Rotating SU(2) gluon matter and deconfinement at finite temperature , Phys

    Y. Jiang, Rotating SU(2) gluon matter and deconfinement at finite temperature , Phys. Lett. B 853 (2024) 138655 [ 2312.06166]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    F. Sun, K. Xu and M. Huang, Splitting of chiral and deconfinement phase transitions induced by rotation, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 096007 [ 2307.14402]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Chen, Z.-B

    H.-L. Chen, Z.-B. Zhu and X.-G. Huang, Quark-meson model under rotation: A functional renormalization group study , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 054006 [ 2306.08362]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Y.-Q. Zhao, S. He, D. Hou, L. Li and Z. Li, Phase diagram of holographic thermal dense QCD matter with rotation , JHEP 04 (2023) 115 [ 2212.14662]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Yadav, Deconfinement temperature of rotating QGP at intermediate coupling from M-theory, Phys

    G. Yadav, Deconfinement temperature of rotating QGP at intermediate coupling from M-theory, Phys. Lett. B 841 (2023) 137925 [ 2203.11959]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Braga, L.F

    N.R.F. Braga, L.F. Faulhaber and O.C. Junqueira, Confinement-deconfinement temperature for a rotating quark-gluon plasma , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 106003 [ 2201.05581]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Mehr and F

    S.M.A.T. Mehr and F. Taghinavaz, Chiral phase transition of a dense, magnetized and rotating quark matter , Annals Phys. 454 (2023) 169357 [ 2201.05398]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Sadooghi, S.M.A

    N. Sadooghi, S.M.A. Tabatabaee Mehr and F. Taghinavaz, Inverse magnetorotational catalysis and the phase diagram of a rotating hot and magnetized quark matter , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 116022 [ 2108.12760]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima and Y. Hidaka, Deconfining Phase Boundary of Rapidly Rotating Hot and Dense Matter and Analysis of Moment of Inertia , Phys. Lett. B 816 (2021) 136184 [2101.09173]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Zhang, C

    Z. Zhang, C. Shi, X.-T. He, X. Luo and H.-S. Zong, Chiral phase transition inside a rotating cylinder within the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 114023 [2012.01017]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Y. Chen, D. Li and M. Huang, Inhomogeneous chiral condensation under rotation in the holographic QCD, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 106002 [ 2208.05668]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Jiang, Chiral vortical catalysis, Eur

    Y. Jiang, Chiral vortical catalysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 949 [ 2108.09622]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Mameda and K

    K. Mameda and K. Takizawa, Deconfinement transition in the revolving bag model , Phys. Lett. B 847 (2023) 138317 [ 2308.07310]. – 40 –

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Y. Chen, X. Chen, D. Li and M. Huang, Deconfinement and chiral restoration phase transition under rotation from holography in an anisotropic gravitational background , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 046006 [ 2405.06386]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [31]

    F. Sun, J. Shao, R. Wen, K. Xu and M. Huang, Chiral phase transition and spin alignment of vector mesons in the polarized-Polyakov-loop Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model under rotation , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 116017 [ 2402.16595]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Yamamoto and Y

    A. Yamamoto and Y. Hirono, Lattice QCD in rotating frames , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 081601 [1303.6292]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Braguta, A.Y

    V.V. Braguta, A.Y. Kotov, D.D. Kuznedelev and A.A. Roenko, Study of the Confinement/Deconfinement Phase Transition in Rotating Lattice SU(3) Gluodynamics , JETP Lett. 112 (2020) 6

    2020

  27. [34]

    Braguta, A.Y

    V.V. Braguta, A.Y. Kotov, D.D. Kuznedelev and A.A. Roenko, Influence of relativistic rotation on the confinement-deconfinement transition in gluodynamics , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 094515 [ 2102.05084]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Braguta, A.Y

    V. Braguta, A.Y. Kotov, D. Kuznedelev and A. Roenko, Lattice study of the confinement/deconfinement transition in rotating gluodynamics, PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 125 [2110.12302]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Chernodub, V.A

    M.N. Chernodub, V.A. Goy and A.V. Molochkov, Inhomogeneity of a rotating gluon plasma and the Tolman-Ehrenfest law in imaginary time: Lattice results for fast imaginary rotation , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 114502 [ 2209.15534]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Braguta, A

    V.V. Braguta, A. Kotov, A. Roenko and D. Sychev, Thermal phase transitions in rotating QCD with dynamical quarks , PoS LA TTICE2022(2023) 190 [ 2212.03224]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Yang and X.-G

    J.-C. Yang and X.-G. Huang, QCD on Rotating Lattice with Staggered Fermions , 2307.05755

    arXiv

  32. [39]

    Chernodub, Inhomogeneous confining-deconfining phases in rotating plasmas , Phys

    M.N. Chernodub, Inhomogeneous confining-deconfining phases in rotating plasmas , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 054027 [ 2012.04924]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Braga and O.C

    N.R.F. Braga and O.C. Junqueira, Inhomogeneity of a rotating quark-gluon plasma from holography, Phys. Lett. B 848 (2024) 138330 [ 2306.08653]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. Chen, K. Fukushima and Y. Shimada, Inhomogeneous confinement and chiral symmetry breaking induced by imaginary angular velocity , Phys. Lett. B 859 (2024) 139107 [2404.00965]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Jiang, Inhomogeneous SU(2) gluon matter under rotation , Phys

    Y. Jiang, Inhomogeneous SU(2) gluon matter under rotation , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 054047 [2406.03311]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Braguta, M.N

    V.V. Braguta, M.N. Chernodub, A.A. Roenko and D.A. Sychev, Negative moment of inertia and rotational instability of gluon plasma , Phys. Lett. B 852 (2024) 138604 [ 2303.03147]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Braguta, I.E

    V.V. Braguta, I.E. Kudrov, A.A. Roenko, D.A. Sychev and M.N. Chernodub, Lattice Study of the Equation of State of a Rotating Gluon Plasma , JETP Lett. 117 (2023) 639

    2023

  38. [46]

    Braguta, M.N

    V.V. Braguta, M.N. Chernodub, I.E. Kudrov, A.A. Roenko and D.A. Sychev, Moment of – 41 – inertia and supervortical temperature of gluon plasma , PoS LA TTICE2023(2024) 181 [2311.03947]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Braguta, M.N

    V.V. Braguta, M.N. Chernodub, I.E. Kudrov, A.A. Roenko and D.A. Sychev, Negative Barnett effect, negative moment of inertia of the gluon plasma, and thermal evaporation of the chromomagnetic condensate , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 014511 [ 2310.16036]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Siri and N

    E. Siri and N. Sadooghi, Thermodynamic properties of a relativistic Bose gas under rigid rotation, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 036016 [ 2405.09481]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Siri and N

    E. Siri and N. Sadooghi, Bose-Einstein condensation in a rigidly rotating relativistic boson gas, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 036011 [ 2411.12581]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Israel, Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A Causal relativistic theory , Annals Phys

    W. Israel, Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A Causal relativistic theory , Annals Phys. 100 (1976) 310

    1976

  43. [51]

    Cercignani and G

    C. Cercignani and G. Kremer, The relativistic Boltzmann equation: theory and applications , Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland (2002)

    2002

  44. [52]

    Ambru¸ s and E

    V.E. Ambru¸ s and E. Winstanley,Rotating fermions inside a cylindrical boundary , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 104014 [ 1512.05239]

    2016 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Mechanics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, England, 3 ed. (1982)

    1982

  46. [54]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, England, 3 ed. (1996)

    1996

  47. [55]

    Matsuo, J

    M. Matsuo, J. Ieda and S. Maekawa, Mechanical generation of spin current , Frontiers in Physics 3 (2015) 54

    2015

  48. [56]

    Wang, J.-X

    S. Wang, J.-X. Chen, D. Hou and H.-C. Ren, Strong Coupling Expansion of Gluodynamics on a Lattice under Rotation , 2505.15487

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Part 2 , Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, England, 3 ed. (1996)

    1996

  50. [58]

    Savvidy, Infrared Instability of the Vacuum State of Gauge Theories and Asymptotic Freedom, Phys

    G.K. Savvidy, Infrared Instability of the Vacuum State of Gauge Theories and Asymptotic Freedom, Phys. Lett. B 71 (1977) 133

    1977

  51. [59]

    Tolman, On the Weight of Heat and Thermal Equilibrium in General Relativity , Phys

    R.C. Tolman, On the Weight of Heat and Thermal Equilibrium in General Relativity , Phys. Rev. 35 (1930) 904

    1930

  52. [60]

    Tolman and P

    R. Tolman and P. Ehrenfest, Temperature Equilibrium in a Static Gravitational Field , Phys. Rev. 36 (1930) 1791

    1930

  53. [61]

    Curci, P

    G. Curci, P. Menotti and G. Paffuti, Symanzik’s Improved Lagrangian for Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Lett. B 130 (1983) 205

    1983

  54. [62]

    Luscher and P

    M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Computation of the Action for On-Shell Improved Lattice Gauge Theories at Weak Coupling , Phys. Lett. B 158 (1985) 250

    1985

  55. [63]

    Ambru¸ s and M.N

    V.E. Ambru¸ s and M.N. Chernodub, Rigidly rotating scalar fields: Between real divergence and imaginary fractalization , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 085016 [ 2304.05998]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Karsch, SU(N) Gauge Theory Couplings on Asymmetric Lattices , Nucl

    F. Karsch, SU(N) Gauge Theory Couplings on Asymmetric Lattices , Nucl. Phys. B 205 (1982) 285. – 42 –

    1982

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.